A stable Pakistan means the establishment needs a carrot to control the crowd which means re-upping the militancy on Kashmir. Never fall into these 'moderate' traps.
True why does the Indian anchor even bother to invite these Pakistanis on the podcast cant the anchor reply to the paki guy when he says trade the pakis have no money to pay india why shall we trade with them and why shall india bail Pakistan out for them to create more problems in Kashmir and create more unrest for us
The argument that a destabilised Pak is not good for India doesnt hold any water in my opinion. In their better days, their focus was to bleed India through a thousand cuts, lets not forget. Due to their current economic situation, they are unable to focus their ill intent towards us, also being targeted by their other neighbour Afhanistan. They still not have given any credible assurance to the world how they will rise from their mess, in summary, India should watch closely from the side lines and see how the situation pans out . While Wajahat admits Pak needs India currently, the situation would have been totally different had they been in a better economic state, he would have been much more hostile even on the interview than the conciliatory mask he has to reluctantly put on now. Everything boils down to Economic prowess!
agreed. majority pkstnis are jahil & extremist(offensive in the sense & full of hatred). see those street interviews in joke pkstn. Basically they are greedy( lalchi) in nature.
That's a keen observation sir, when you say that Wajahat is reluctantly putting on a conciliatory mask because Pakistan is a failed state today, & even the Islamic nations are not willing to help them. The moment they become somewhat stable they will go whole hog in their evil design of 'bleeding India through a thousand cuts'. The gentleman says that Pakistan is relevant to India because a disintegrated Pakistan with its nuclear arsenal with a highly weaponised society will be threat to India,in other words you deal with Pakistan for its nuisance value!
Instead of asking his country citizens to change the way they elect &control there military he is scaring India about the consequences of failed Pakistan. That’s the biggest problem today in Pakistan
While rogue countries on the planet negotiate with the rest of the world with their guns pointed at the latter, paxtan is the only rogue country on the planet which negotiates with the rest of the world with a gun pointed to its head.
He has narrated what Pakistan is doing since it came into existence. He is right actually but it's scary too. 220 million people who are almost confused and mixed their religion with politics and don't know what to do.
46' - 47' election result which paved the way for ppartition ------mmosslim constituency ( Bombay Province 100% vote goes to M. League , Madras Province 100% , Bengal 95% , Assam 91% , Orissa 100% , Central Province 93% ...so on so on ....) popul. xchange kyo nahi kiya .... tab akal ghass churney gayi thi...
I wrote similar statement above but it was only me who was to vote against BJP but seeing your comment I will try hard to vote against whoever try to have relationship with pak. Someone said stable relationship means stable trade stable trade mean stable income for Pakistan it means stable Pakistan which means stable terrorism against India. So better no relation.
China is 18 trillion economy. Without any neighbour. Its bullshot. We dont need Pakistan We have full Asean to trade. Rich asean. Full middle east. Full Africa Noone needs Pakistan. Did China need indis or Mongolia or Korea. No
So, A prosperous Pakistan wud simply mean more headache for India. And, the chances of Peace between Pak n India r 0% ad long as their (pak) army exists alongside radicalised people n politicians.
@@user-so9my7uh3m in order to become rich Pakistan has to become progressive pragmatic and economy oriented in thought - which should in theory make them easier to deal with, meanwhile poverty makes them more religious and violent. but history hasn't really proven out this thesis because Pakistan was able to get advantages over India historically without ever reforming themselves and ended up attacking instead
Paki naya churan bechane ki koshish kar rahe hai...."prosperou pak will help india prosperous more"........and indian left media is buying that churan.....but i am sure Modi-Shah-Jaishankar are not buying any of this crap.....tabhi to pareshaan hai ye log....
So China with unstable neighbour Pak, they grew up exponentially but for India to attain it's full economic potential we need stable Pak...what kind of logic is this
Another canard is that regions grow and not countries and so we should do saarc. But Japan grew on its own, later south korea, after that even china went alone. India is big enough to be a region on its own. I am not a fan of saarc or honestly even bimstec.
Whenever Pakistan got prosperous and got new advanced military equipments , they declared war on INDIA , so nope we know what happens when pak gets money. History repeats itself.
Funny how entitled these guys feel. They shamelessly claim...that we are the trouble you need to pamper or we will he more trouble. The way we see it now...deal with it once and for all than forever.
We must not forget how Mr modi went to Pakistan on short notice just to meet shareef big brother who became pm.Then pathankot happened and then uri happened,then pulwama happened.This gov is keen on becoming friends with Pakistan but their are some forces in Pakistan which will never let it happen.Mosad caught two Pakistani terrorists just yesterday that were coming to attack a shop in Mumbai.This gov should understand Pakistan will never change you can help them and fill their stomachs and pockets so that when they come to do another terrorist attack they shouldn't be hungry and should have a full stomach.
Nope it's not a mistake he tried to make peace and it's the only party that gives army freehand..I was saying why they want to give them business now after all they will not change or anything
46' - 47' election result which paved the way for ppartition ------mmosslim constituency ( Bombay Province 100% vote goes to M. League , Madras Province 100% , Bengal 95% , Assam 91% , Orissa 100% , Central Province 93% ...so on so on ....) prepare for another ccivil wwar ..... it is going to happen one day ..... congress didnot do popul. xchange & it was a blunder.
@@urrasscal8380 sleep well, those who got Pakistan and couldn't run the country, and today they bagging for food and medical protection and Allah can't be everywhere, even he says those who don't respect the systems should be punished and you can see that in ur payra Pakistan,
India should not bow down to the threat of instability of Pakistan. Almost every Pakistani thinks that suicide bomber threat will work every time, forgetting the fact that's what it's been doing for a long time and it's not going to be worse than it. If Pakistan does go under, they do have Afghanistan and Iran, their brothers.
India can adapt to an ever unstable Pakistan, Indians should never be the ones who fear disintegration of Pakistan. Rather India should be the first who prepares for such an eventuality. India might help the people of Pakistan ( not the political entity of Pakistan ) only in the event of mass starvation on purely humanitarian basis. Otherwise India should not do anything out of the way extending any sort of help to Pakistan. We still remember the treacherous back stabbing behaviour of Pakistan for the last 75 years and what it has put India through for so long.
Precisely was my answer too...to cover the point of the host's apprehension about paki being dangerously highly weaponised and radicalised society...is the exact point India should not befriend pakistan and let it disintegrate into four by deviding army and people, which will do good to the people of present pakistan and the paki elites!! Also, all those who befriended pakistan has been doomed and we are progressing better after 2014 with no relationship with paki then in earlier years...pak is a cursed country and reaping fruits of its Karma!!
I just want to add that as a society Pakistan is throughly brutalized and turned inhuman as can be seen from the way Hindus and other minorities are attacked, kidnapped and killed and the way brutal treatment meted out in the name of blasphemy. India should not touch / help Pakistan.
Dream on. Pakistan will never disintegrate, god willing. Pakistan is evolving and all great nations go through this process. It’s only a matter of time before Pakistan puts its house in order.
This guy is a favourite of pakistan army and will recite the ISI script . His propaganda holds no traction in India...pakistan was created by the Brits as a sentry post for the western powers to keep an eye on Russia . Later Iran and Afghanistan became other hot spots for which the americans used pakistan . Once pakistan ceased to be of any value the americans moved on and the borrowed economic growth of pakistan collapsed like a pack of cards.
Bro, I agree with you 100 per cent. Sadly most of us Indians are still idealistic to the point of stupidity and think that we should rescue everyone in trouble, no matter how much they resent/hate us
I don't know what Wajahat is talking about when he says Parvez Musharraf had "progressive" ideas about India! Musharraf was the guy who authored the Kargill misadventure and the 26/11 Mumbai terrorist attack
I think he is referring to Post Kargil Musharraf who was a different political entity than the war hawk who wanted Kashmir. He can be considered as a pioneer of trade/tourism with India policy that Bajwa implemented partially.
@@rutvikrswhat kool aid u are drinking 😂😂 Musharraf was a dishonest, venomous snake who carried out so many terrorist attacks on Indian civilians AFTER Kargil.
Mai is baat se bilkul agree nahi karta ki 'Stable Pakistan is good for India'. Ha agar Pakistan ek normal state hota, jaise Bangladesh hai, tab ye baat sach hota. But Pakistan ek normal state nahi hai. Wo jab khud Stable hote hai, tab wo dusro ko unstable karne me apna energy and paisa lagate hai. Aur jab tak Pakistan ka ye trait khatam nahi hota, tab tak humaare liye sabse achha yahi ho ga ki , 'Pakistan ko edge' par rakhha jae. Mai ye bhi nahi chahata ki Pakistan break ho jae, kyu ki uske baad kya ho ga usme bahut uncertainty hai, bahut chaos hua to hume bhi effect ho sakta hai. Isliye Pakistan ko just extreme edge par rakhho, jisse ki uska saara energy sirf Zinda rahane me chala jae.
bangaldesh is not a normal desh jab sheik hasina jayegi tab dekhna bangaldesh ko .... 47' main sabse pehle hhindu 'o' ko marna in kangali chusllim ne start kiya tha direct action k time ...don't ever trust this kangladeshi ... they r also ddangerous..
Don't worry there are no agendas with Indian government on helping them probably the trade won't even be resumed and Pakistan has nothing to leverage on India. Helping Sri Lanka was for beneficial to us but why help Pakistan, have they helped us in times of need ? All they did was declare war when we were at our weakest, they shouldn't even expect any help from India and India has a lot of issues that needs attention.
Let us forget and dont think of Pak and pay our attention for our betterment. You can trust a Cobra but not Pakistan. Since they are now in deep rooted problems, they talk of solving disputes, A week back one leader threatened India with Nukes. That is Pak.
His argument is India should help pak because of the coming refugee crisis. I think india should militarize border in even more rather than helping pak. This HT host is br@in dead softballer
A stable Pakistan is in everybody's interests. However, Pakistan has exploited this very fact and blackmailed the various global powers into giving them aid. But, we aren't falling for this ruse anymore.
It is said, while rogue countries on the planet negotiate with the rest of the world with their guns pointed at the latter, Pakistan is the only rogue country which negotiates with the rest of the world with a gun pointed to its head.
A stable pakistan is in nobody's interest . Ordinary Pak citizens dream of Ghazwa e Hind and hoisting Pak flag on the Red fort in Delhi . Ordinary Indians don't even think of Pakistan and neither do they want to capture Pakistan and make them Hindu . For India , current Pakistan is like a wounded snake . It has every intention to bite you but it lacks the capability . The moment it becomes healthy , it will try biting you again
@@madhuram7017 Not their Army, their Jihad networks, Mafia, Radical population, Frenzy criminals will make mass infiltration in to India if Pakistan collapses and Engage in wild West culture which even India is also not accustomed to fight Except Afghanistan, Syria, Russian Wagner group can manage and face the Frankenstein monsters.
11:26 If pakistan fails (...which it will) , you will have open/porus borders with Iran, afghanistan & china to welcome you with open arms, and here in India, we will have some democratic parties crying thier heart out for you at the top of thier lungs...and that's it !! You won't get a night's stay in India as far as refugee crisis is concerned. Hope we have made ourselves aptly clear, you have 55 other countries(unma mulk !!), go thrive there !
This is very right time openly support for people of Sindhu and others to divide Pak as they are doing in Kashmir . Why we should feel shy of it. Tit for Tat.
Khalistan kashmir tamil nadu kerala maratha assam telegu r u ready to divided artificial indian indeginous country ? Let me know if truth hurts n plz remove sindh from ur national anthem it again is a blunder on ur mythology existance
@@khaleelmohammadjutt4980 Bhonsdike Sindh represents the migrant sindhi hindu population who had to leave their motherland because of you katuwas and dont worry India is very strong and United no matter how hard you pakistanis try to bleed it
@@khaleelmohammadjutt4980 I’m from Tamil Nadu, we don’t want to break away from India. We may have our differences but we prefer to work as unity of states under the Indian constitution not as an independent state. The recent Keezhadi-Tamil Nadu archaeological findings have very close relations to the Harappa-Mohenjodaro (Indus valley) style of civilization. So it is not a myth. Better go get educated on facts from authentic sources rather blab out crap that you pile up from social media. 🤫🤫
@@viss6584 i have many tamilian friends bro dont tell me what u ppl r first try to learn hindi and accept central government i cant write more here and remaining if u had so called relation y did u end up in far south ? Do u see my sir name ? we were the first settlers of Indus Sindh Pakistan who migrated thousands of years from Middle east and flourished it
I think we can all agree..A stable pk means, more tension for India (azaad ksmir, blah blah) These talks are just done so, H indus or Indians in general feel guilty in order to "help pk", lets not forget, we are kuffars...So long pk! Goodbye!
But Pak Govt need to stop Terrorism for any trade possible. Also, medicine are going from India to Pak. Syed Salahuddin, Hafiz Saeed etc moving freely in Pal
India does not need stable pakistan but need a pakistan that is broken in 4 states. I used to laugh even years ago when certain political leaders and bollywood personalities used to make this statement that stable pakistan is India need, when they used to fund every terrorist org that acted against India. That statement used to stand against every logic and data, but they used to make the stupid statement proudly nonetheless. I hope Indian govt continues current policy against pakistan and wait and watch what happens to it. If it breaks then we negotiate with govt of Sindh and Balochistan or if it continues in current trajectory then we are good as an economic pauper pakistan cannot fund terrorists.
The population is 250 million and growing. Sushant Sarin had said that their population centers are close to Indian border. How will we stop refugees from coming over? Moreover these will be a radicalized refugee group that can destabilize India even if 1 million manage to get in.
Refugee crisis will never happen as the west will always help them and even if it did they are more likely to go towards Afghanistan as they hate India more.
@ss0498 No the Bangladesh border can't be fenced because the area is swampy. But the Pakistan border from Jammu to Gujarat is dry and is fenced. It's even visible from space. The only problem areas is Kashmir where it's mountainous and Rann of Kutch where it's swampy
India has so many internal issues to take care of, like unemployment, illiteracy, skill development, and infrastructure development ( that's the only area where the government is working effectively compared to other areas) inflation & many others. So, rather than focusing on dead horse , India should focus solely on its own development. Apart from that , as the national security state of pakistan, India can never trust pakistan as they have attacked 4 freaking times 1948, 1965, 1971, & 1999 and a series of terror attacks. So it's a large trust deficit , which is not easy to fill until they gain some sort of democracy instead of the current hybrid regime of pak establishment.
Thanks for making some sense. As an Indian, I didn't like the comment section filled by other fellow Indians. You can't upgrade by pulling others down. When I am proud of my country's progress, I don't think aiming for Pakistan's destruction is an Indian thing to do.
Pakistanis should worry about akhirat, hoor, gilma, sharab etc after death. That's the only purpose of life. A true momin won't worry about prosperity in this fani dunia.
He is educated articulate guy. Also he shared that failed Pakistan will be liability for India. We indians n our Government had Plan B to handle failed Pakistan. Already we resolved by making Bangladesh. Next time, it will be divided by 5 countries. Stable and developed Pakistan is more dangerous than instable Pakistan. Jai hind
They will never change mosad just yesterday caught 2 Pakistani terrorists that were coming to attack a shop in Mumbai so why we are talking about this delusional issue .They need to stop terrorism in their country first
When an institution like military has ruled a country for several decades and all other institutions failed to become potent then it's impossible for that country to become a democracy. Pakistan should stop aspiring for democracy and embrace military dictatorship. People will know whom to blame and other countries will know whom to talk to.
I recall Sushant Sareen-ji's tweet, "Imran Khan has left Pakistan in such shit that even the Army is not ready to take over." We just leave them there!
This Prithiraj Syndorme of Hindu majority India has to go do not forget what Quran says to Muslim when having upper Hand Quran 47:35 :So be not weak and ask not for PEACE (from the enemies of Islâm), while you are having the UPPER HAND . God is with you, and will never decrease the reward of your good deeds.
Pakistan is disintegrating. India should allow this process to continue until the Pakistani people start demanding union with India. Only then should India help the Pakistanis.
I rely on my government, and i trust them. So i believe there will be no issue whatever the government or diplomats would think right for India. See, we are commoners, we see Pakistan a enemy and we have the right to think so. But ultimately the policymakers should make the decision, and we will support the government.
I strongly disagree with your view that prosperous Pakistan would be helpful to India. Contrary, prosperous Pakistan is dangerous for India in terms of arrogancy of Pakistan at international forums, security at the borders, exploiting the situation geographically, etc... Current scenario is really helped India in checking situation at borders east and west of Pakistan, handling of situation in Afghanistan, Chinese interference, etc etc.. globally Pakistan is completely isolated...
This gentleman should talk to Pakistan military establishment before he speaks to any Indian.He carries a chip on his shoulder and staying in US is not interested in the Indian subcontinent.he is glorifying the role played by Mr . Musharraf and tries to intimidate. Madam you have wasted your time.
15:02 That's like arguing for an abusive and violent husband, sure he beats his wife but he also takes her to the hospital if the beating was too brutal. Garbage nonsensical ridiculousness like this needs to be countered, we should negotiate for lasting peace with elected governments and not dictators.
Habit never dies. Mindset never changes. India will be a fool of galactical magnitude if it helps Pakistan. Whatever the western analyst has to say India should let Pakistan disintegrate. It is in our interest. Let it break abd fight amoung themselves.
There is no reason to interview the guy from the other side. No need to help them. Let them stay where they are. Let them be unstable or otherwise, we are well prepared to deal with them. Let them not give crap and bull stories. No one will buy them, let alone India under our Honourable Modi Ji. The 3 reasons thst he mentioned are all their own doing. They are in their last leg. Let them dissolve into oblivion for good. Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.
India doesn't need pakistan. Don't spread the myth that a prosperous pakistan is required for India to progress. Pakistan actually needs to be cut down to size so that it stops being an irritant in South Asia..we would love to see a punjabistan with independent balochistan and Sindhu Desh with kpk going to Afghanistan.
Pakistan under TTP rule will be better than present establishment. India should alllow TTP to open a office in Delhi same way as Qatar allowed Afghan Taliban to open a office in Doha.
9:47 pakistan was going to be the next " Israel " was the best line meanwhile pakistani passport - this passport is valid for all counties in the world except " Israel "
I want the stuff this guy is high on ' Stable Pakistan is good for India". Really? Historically a stable Pakistan is a constant nuance. Pakistan elite's Hindu/India hatred is which stops them from any cordial relations. Remember pre Modi era? We were kind of habitual of hearing news of bomb blasts continuously on different Indian cities. It is only in last few year instability in that Islamist country we are safe from Jihadist activities.
Pakistanis like Pervez Hoodbhoy, Syed Muzammil, Zarrar Khurro, and now Wajahat Khan don't have problems with Nehru's India or Romilla Thapar's version(s) of Ancient Indian history because it was tailored to the narrative independent India was delivered with. Pakistanis are petrified by Modi-Ji's India, because (a) it has taken India beyond their reach; (b) growing numbers of Indian Muslims have begun adjusting their lives within the mainstream; (c) better education levels among Muslim women has generated wealth for them and resulted in lower birth rates; (d) no preferential treatment is given to Muslims except in non-BJP ruled states; (e) most Pakistanis believe a Sanatani India will avenge the hate and violence they unleashed on the "Hindu" community since partition; maybe it will? Meanwhile, Zia's brand of political Islam has spawned "nafrat" and grown illiteracy that has clouded the ability of Pakistanis to see beyond their noses!
If Pak PM SS says their country wants relationship with Bharath, immediately their FM billorani says - no need of Gujarat Butcher, their army chief says only after Kashmir dispute resolved, their oppo leader says only after Indian J&K freed & deputy fm says Bharath is going to attack fakistan. Finally there's no connection between country & their president. Based on whose word, Bharath can step forward....?
On of the false narrative spread about Shree Rama is that he Killed Shambuka (a Shudra) because he was performing religious & the Brahmans considered it unacceptable. He was doing a Tapa, Tapa can include many many things, One can do Tapa for wrong reasons also.A child d!ed due to that act of Shambula hence he was punished. Shambuka was k!lled because he committed a crime, a child d!ed because of his action and hence he was k!lled. Shambuka was not k!lled simply because of his varna he was k!lled because of his actions
India should send multiple tons of grass to Pakistan. Because their leader said during the 70's that Pakistani will eat grass if food is not available.
A stable Pakistan means the establishment needs a carrot to control the crowd which means re-upping the militancy on Kashmir. Never fall into these 'moderate' traps.
very true words👉
We have learnt our lessons, lets jus hope our establishment doesnt take this poison coated bait
Keep exposing him
True why does the Indian anchor even bother to invite these Pakistanis on the podcast cant the anchor reply to the paki guy when he says trade the pakis have no money to pay india why shall we trade with them and why shall india bail Pakistan out for them to create more problems in Kashmir and create more unrest for us
so true an unstable Pakistan works in our favor don't know why this Indian anchor could not reply back to this pakistani guy
The argument that a destabilised Pak is not good for India doesnt hold any water in my opinion. In their better days, their focus was to bleed India through a thousand cuts, lets not forget. Due to their current economic situation, they are unable to focus their ill intent towards us, also being targeted by their other neighbour Afhanistan.
They still not have given any credible assurance to the world how they will rise from their mess, in summary, India should watch closely from the side lines and see how the situation pans out .
While Wajahat admits Pak needs India currently, the situation would have been totally different had they been in a better economic state, he would have been much more hostile even on the interview than the conciliatory mask he has to reluctantly put on now. Everything boils down to Economic prowess!
agreed. majority pkstnis are jahil & extremist(offensive in the sense & full of hatred). see those street interviews in joke pkstn. Basically they are greedy( lalchi) in nature.
Very well put and it is the TRUTH
That's a keen observation sir, when you say that Wajahat is reluctantly putting on a conciliatory mask because Pakistan is a failed state today, & even the Islamic nations are not willing to help them. The moment they become somewhat stable they will go whole hog in their evil design of 'bleeding India through a thousand cuts'.
The gentleman says that Pakistan is relevant to India because a disintegrated Pakistan with its nuclear arsenal with a highly weaponised society will be threat to India,in other words you deal with Pakistan for its nuisance value!
@@rajivdevdas5318 well said..👍👍
Absolute truth told in plain terms.
Stable Pakistan means more stability for cross border terrorist. Osama had a very stable shelter in Pakistan.
✅✅
true👉
Good keep exposing him
Unstable and failed Pakistan will inflict severe damage and bleed India heavily.
Instead of threatening to be a suicide bomb, Pakistan must concentrate on ruthlessly introspecting and radically reimagining itself.
Instead of asking his country citizens to change the way they elect &control there military he is scaring India about the consequences of failed Pakistan. That’s the biggest problem today in Pakistan
Absolutely, this is the devious mind of these people.
While rogue countries on the planet negotiate with the rest of the world with their guns pointed at the latter, paxtan is the only rogue country on the planet which negotiates with the rest of the world with a gun pointed to its head.
This is a typical muslim response to a prosperous kafir in the neighbourhood.
the main problem of paapistan is iislamb...
He has narrated what Pakistan is doing since it came into existence. He is right actually but it's scary too. 220 million people who are almost confused and mixed their religion with politics and don't know what to do.
We helped turkey and look what they did? Just secure the borders and improve the fencing of the border area. No help for pakistan, no way.
With automatic guns
46' - 47' election result which paved the way for ppartition ------mmosslim constituency ( Bombay Province 100% vote goes to M. League , Madras Province 100% , Bengal 95% , Assam 91% , Orissa 100% , Central Province 93% ...so on so on ....) popul. xchange kyo nahi kiya .... tab akal ghass churney gayi thi...
@@urrasscal8380 yes brother these fyck bloody indian chuslim voted for creating of pakistan and they were not go that time
L pe Char su 😂 Help 😂
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 must never help the 🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰 who always try to destroy🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 by joining hands with 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
@@mulq555 🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰 must lick master 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳 boots more for money these days with no shame right . 🇨🇳 🐶🇵🇰 ✌
@@mulq555 🇵🇰🇵🇰 sending weapons to 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 and 🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰 is on the Russia radar which announce 🇵🇰🇵🇰 as an enemy in future
@@mulq555 I think most of them will now be located in Pakistan 😂😂😂
@@mulq555 those 220 million beggars earn less than our 150 million beggars 😂😂😂
@@mulq555 oh … there are call centres also in Pakistan
I thought there were only terrorism centres there
If Modi gives even 1 rupee help to Pakistan then my while village of 4,000 people will vote for NOTA
I wrote similar statement above but it was only me who was to vote against BJP but seeing your comment I will try hard to vote against whoever try to have relationship with pak. Someone said stable relationship means stable trade stable trade mean stable income for Pakistan it means stable Pakistan which means stable terrorism against India. So better no relation.
@Ganesh Bagde None of the Above
Itni navrat kyu bhia. Log Pakistan ke thik h lekin sarkar or govt mc h waha ki
China is 18 trillion economy. Without any neighbour. Its bullshot. We dont need Pakistan
We have full Asean to trade. Rich asean. Full middle east. Full Africa
Noone needs Pakistan. Did China need indis or Mongolia or Korea. No
So, A prosperous Pakistan wud simply mean more headache for India. And, the chances of Peace between Pak n India r 0% ad long as their (pak) army exists alongside radicalised people n politicians.
How ?
How would a prosperous Pakistan help India , is one thing I have never understood
@@user-so9my7uh3m in order to become rich Pakistan has to become progressive pragmatic and economy oriented in thought - which should in theory make them easier to deal with, meanwhile poverty makes them more religious and violent. but history hasn't really proven out this thesis because Pakistan was able to get advantages over India historically without ever reforming themselves and ended up attacking instead
@@echosmith5256 thank you for explaining 😊👍🏻
Paki naya churan bechane ki koshish kar rahe hai...."prosperou pak will help india prosperous more"........and indian left media is buying that churan.....but i am sure Modi-Shah-Jaishankar are not buying any of this crap.....tabhi to pareshaan hai ye log....
Pakistan is never gonna prosper
No mercy until they are finished
So China with unstable neighbour Pak, they grew up exponentially but for India to attain it's full economic potential we need stable Pak...what kind of logic is this
Pakistani logic. What did you expect? 😂
Thats like open threat .. if you don't give alms to pakistan then maybe they will create problems for india 😂
Another canard is that regions grow and not countries and so we should do saarc. But Japan grew on its own, later south korea, after that even china went alone. India is big enough to be a region on its own. I am not a fan of saarc or honestly even bimstec.
Saarc / bimstec countries will just re export chinese stuff to india under masked names
joke pkstn. Basically they are greedy in nature. logic naam ke koi cheez hi nehi hai inme. see those street interviews in joke pkstn.
NOW INDIA MUST FOCUS ON CHANGING THE WORLD MAP AGAIN AS WE DID IN 1971 PAKISTAN SHOULD BE SPLIT IN 3 DIFFERENT COUNTRIES.
We don't want any part of Pakistan to reunite with India.... Unless we only get the land without any Mleccha momin!
Kuch bhi Karo, lekin please India mein mat mila dena
@@vsukhani except PoJK. That is our territory and carries significant geopolitical value
@@vsukhani India Nahi Bhai...mitti mein Mila denge😁
@@vsukhani SARE COUNTRIES ALAG ALAG HONGE JINKE INDIA KE SATH TERMS ACCHE HONGE
India is never going to forgive nor forget Mumbai terror attack
Congress PM Mr Singh already forgiven, we the people will not.
Whenever Pakistan got prosperous and got new advanced military equipments , they declared war on INDIA , so nope we know what happens when pak gets money. History repeats itself.
yes, disintigation of pak is only solution for long term india stability
A landlocked panjab should be left for pak
Wajahat is saying take care of me else we will blast nuke😂😂😂
kar de blast
just like TLP ideology. Afghanistan like situation is gaining ground in joke pkstn.
@@Tutanchat one hand kkurand & other nnuke puke.
Don’t worry wajahat, we are not only prepared for Pakistan to be a failed state, we are looking forward for it.
Pakistani millitary ordered 679 VT tanks despite economic crises. Why should India save them .
Funny how entitled these guys feel. They shamelessly claim...that we are the trouble you need to pamper or we will he more trouble.
The way we see it now...deal with it once and for all than forever.
Exactly that self entitlement
@@mylord3003 Self entitlement and pomposity based upon delusions of self grandeur.
We must not forget how Mr modi went to Pakistan on short notice just to meet shareef big brother who became pm.Then pathankot happened and then uri happened,then pulwama happened.This gov is keen on becoming friends with Pakistan but their are some forces in Pakistan which will never let it happen.Mosad caught two Pakistani terrorists just yesterday that were coming to attack a shop in Mumbai.This gov should understand Pakistan will never change you can help them and fill their stomachs and pockets so that when they come to do another terrorist attack they shouldn't be hungry and should have a full stomach.
Were those 2 Pakistanis and 1 Iranian going to attack Israel or India? Clarifying cos some of the reports suggested Israel
Big mistakes from modi side's to even to go Pakistan,
I would even talk to any Pakistan.
Nope it's not a mistake he tried to make peace and it's the only party that gives army freehand..I was saying why they want to give them business now after all they will not change or anything
46' - 47' election result which paved the way for ppartition ------mmosslim constituency ( Bombay Province 100% vote goes to M. League , Madras Province 100% , Bengal 95% , Assam 91% , Orissa 100% , Central Province 93% ...so on so on ....) prepare for another ccivil wwar ..... it is going to happen one day ..... congress didnot do popul. xchange & it was a blunder.
@@urrasscal8380 sleep well, those who got Pakistan and couldn't run the country, and today they bagging for food and medical protection and Allah can't be everywhere, even he says those who don't respect the systems should be punished and you can see that in ur payra Pakistan,
India should not bow down to the threat of instability of Pakistan.
Almost every Pakistani thinks that suicide bomber threat will work every time, forgetting the fact that's what it's been doing for a long time and it's not going to be worse than it. If Pakistan does go under, they do have Afghanistan and Iran, their brothers.
Wahajat is threatening us in a polite way
Such people are called Sophisticated crooks !
Same is done by their intellectuals like Nisar and Hoodboy
This Pakistani analyst is off his rockers. Hindustan Times please invite people who are in touch with reality. RIP Pakistan
Pakistan should re connect with its civilizational identity discard Islam
Then only they can join India
India can adapt to an ever unstable Pakistan, Indians should never be the ones who fear disintegration of Pakistan.
Rather India should be the first who prepares for such an eventuality.
India might help the people of Pakistan ( not the political entity of Pakistan ) only in the event of mass starvation on purely humanitarian basis.
Otherwise India should not do anything out of the way extending any sort of help to Pakistan. We still remember the treacherous back stabbing behaviour of Pakistan for the last 75 years and what it has put India through for so long.
Indians esp Hindus have this 'Mother India complex'. We should never disturb a self destructing enemy Islamic nation.
Precisely was my answer too...to cover the point of the host's apprehension about paki being dangerously highly weaponised and radicalised society...is the exact point India should not befriend pakistan and let it disintegrate into four by deviding army and people, which will do good to the people of present pakistan and the paki elites!! Also, all those who befriended pakistan has been doomed and we are progressing better after 2014 with no relationship with paki then in earlier years...pak is a cursed country and reaping fruits of its Karma!!
I just want to add that as a society Pakistan is throughly brutalized and turned inhuman as can be seen from the way Hindus and other minorities are attacked, kidnapped and killed and the way brutal treatment meted out in the name of blasphemy. India should not touch / help Pakistan.
Let them starve instead help the starving people of India they have a better chance of helping the nation
Dream on. Pakistan will never disintegrate, god willing. Pakistan is evolving and all great nations go through this process. It’s only a matter of time before Pakistan puts its house in order.
Wajahat is a true Mohabbe Watan and true Momeen hard stuck with his Izlamic goals
It's called Taqqiya. Google it.
Delusional in chief
A true paxtani punjabi who vehemently believes in the tried and failed two-nation theory.
And a product/asset of Pak military
@@jasha9sandhu so full of himself and his glib tounge and his bull
This guy is a favourite of pakistan army and will recite the ISI script . His propaganda holds no traction in India...pakistan was created by the Brits as a sentry post for the western powers to keep an eye on Russia . Later Iran and Afghanistan became other hot spots for which the americans used pakistan . Once pakistan ceased to be of any value the americans moved on and the borrowed economic growth of pakistan collapsed like a pack of cards.
Ponkaaaaaa
Now these guys are begging sophisticatedly!!😂😂😂
*All Neighbors of India are Actively/Passively Hostile. Must not forget*
Bro, I agree with you 100 per cent. Sadly most of us Indians are still idealistic to the point of stupidity and think that we should rescue everyone in trouble, no matter how much they resent/hate us
I don't know what Wajahat is talking about when he says Parvez Musharraf had "progressive" ideas about India! Musharraf was the guy who authored the Kargill misadventure and the 26/11 Mumbai terrorist attack
I think he is referring to Post Kargil Musharraf who was a different political entity than the war hawk who wanted Kashmir. He can be considered as a pioneer of trade/tourism with India policy that Bajwa implemented partially.
@@rutvikrswhat kool aid u are drinking 😂😂 Musharraf was a dishonest, venomous snake who carried out so many terrorist attacks on Indian civilians AFTER Kargil.
Mai is baat se bilkul agree nahi karta ki 'Stable Pakistan is good for India'.
Ha agar Pakistan ek normal state hota, jaise Bangladesh hai, tab ye baat sach hota.
But Pakistan ek normal state nahi hai.
Wo jab khud Stable hote hai, tab wo dusro ko unstable karne me apna energy and paisa lagate hai.
Aur jab tak Pakistan ka ye trait khatam nahi hota, tab tak humaare liye sabse achha yahi ho ga ki , 'Pakistan ko edge' par rakhha jae.
Mai ye bhi nahi chahata ki Pakistan break ho jae, kyu ki uske baad kya ho ga usme bahut uncertainty hai, bahut chaos hua to hume bhi effect ho sakta hai.
Isliye Pakistan ko just extreme edge par rakhho, jisse ki uska saara energy sirf Zinda rahane me chala jae.
sehi
Infact we used to think that way only. But pakistan got more emboldened with stability and flirted with more adventurism against india
correct. let pak continue with its economic struggle as long as possible
As Ajit would say, “Pakistan ko liquid oxygen mei dal do. Liquid usay jeena nahin dega. Oxygen usay marney nahin dega”
bangaldesh is not a normal desh jab sheik hasina jayegi tab dekhna bangaldesh ko .... 47' main sabse pehle hhindu 'o' ko marna in kangali chusllim ne start kiya tha direct action k time ...don't ever trust this kangladeshi ... they r also ddangerous..
"Stable Pakistan is well for India" Joke of the century. 🤣🤣
So a failed paxtaan is dangerous so give them money is wot the discussion is all abt.
Don't worry there are no agendas with Indian government on helping them probably the trade won't even be resumed and Pakistan has nothing to leverage on India. Helping Sri Lanka was for beneficial to us but why help Pakistan, have they helped us in times of need ? All they did was declare war when we were at our weakest, they shouldn't even expect any help from India and India has a lot of issues that needs attention.
@@ss0498 👌🙏
give me money otherwise i will k$$l myself ....
Madarsachap discussion standards 😂
Let us forget and dont think of Pak and pay our attention for our betterment. You can trust a Cobra but not Pakistan. Since they are now in deep rooted problems, they talk of solving disputes, A week back one leader threatened India with Nukes. That is Pak.
That's all they can do
yes, broken pakistan is better than failing pakistan.
Sums up wajahat alis mindset: Gan& fate to fate par nawabi na ghate 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Self entitlement and pomposity based upon delusions of self grandeur.
Why should we help Pak? Its akin to feeding milk to snake.
Even helping Bhutan looks futile
All Neighbors of Ind are Passively Active Hostile
His argument is India should help pak because of the coming refugee crisis.
I think india should militarize border in even more rather than helping pak.
This HT host is br@in dead softballer
Yeah. Correct. Pakistani trainers in India just blasted on Ram Navmi in Aurangabad. Just few hours ago
Pakistan should vacate our land and move towards Mecca madina (Saudi Arabia) .
A stable Pakistan is in everybody's interests. However, Pakistan has exploited this very fact and blackmailed the various global powers into giving them aid. But, we aren't falling for this ruse anymore.
It is said, while rogue countries on the planet negotiate with the rest of the world with their guns pointed at the latter, Pakistan is the only rogue country which negotiates with the rest of the world with a gun pointed to its head.
A stable pakistan is in nobody's interest . Ordinary Pak citizens dream of Ghazwa e Hind and hoisting Pak flag on the Red fort in Delhi . Ordinary Indians don't even think of Pakistan and neither do they want to capture Pakistan and make them Hindu . For India , current Pakistan is like a wounded snake . It has every intention to bite you but it lacks the capability . The moment it becomes healthy , it will try biting you again
Is he trying to threaten India..or is he asking for help from India..
Threatening India.
@@Damien_Mctyline by begging..😅😅
@@madhuram7017 No Threatening India with dire consequences, if India don't oblige to Pakistan demands and requirements.
@@Damien_Mctyline bro that's ain't going to happen they are in position to do it...
@@madhuram7017 Not their Army, their Jihad networks, Mafia, Radical population, Frenzy criminals will make mass infiltration in to India if Pakistan collapses and Engage in wild West culture which even India is also not accustomed to fight Except Afghanistan, Syria, Russian Wagner group can manage and face the Frankenstein monsters.
Let overseas Pakistanis take care !!
the only things which is benificial for india is disintrigation of pakistan, no need to help pakistan.
Hindustan Time's is also acting against hindus in some Case's
Some...?? Many
11:26 If pakistan fails (...which it will) , you will have open/porus borders with Iran, afghanistan & china to welcome you with open arms, and here in India, we will have some democratic parties crying thier heart out for you at the top of thier lungs...and that's it !!
You won't get a night's stay in India as far as refugee crisis is concerned. Hope we have made ourselves aptly clear, you have 55 other countries(unma mulk !!), go thrive there !
Umma is for show when there is problems they will come to AMMA (INDIA)
This is very right time openly support for people of Sindhu and others to divide Pak as they are doing in Kashmir . Why we should feel shy of it. Tit for Tat.
Khalistan kashmir tamil nadu kerala maratha assam telegu r u ready to divided artificial indian indeginous country ? Let me know if truth hurts n plz remove sindh from ur national anthem it again is a blunder on ur mythology existance
@@khaleelmohammadjutt4980 Bhonsdike Sindh represents the migrant sindhi hindu population who had to leave their motherland because of you katuwas and dont worry India is very strong and United no matter how hard you pakistanis try to bleed it
@@khaleelmohammadjutt4980 I’m from Tamil Nadu, we don’t want to break away from India. We may have our differences but we prefer to work as unity of states under the Indian constitution not as an independent state. The recent Keezhadi-Tamil Nadu archaeological findings have very close relations to the Harappa-Mohenjodaro (Indus valley) style of civilization. So it is not a myth. Better go get educated on facts from authentic sources rather blab out crap that you pile up from social media. 🤫🤫
agreed. we should👉
@@viss6584 i have many tamilian friends bro dont tell me what u ppl r first try to learn hindi and accept central government i cant write more here and remaining if u had so called relation y did u end up in far south ? Do u see my sir name ? we were the first settlers of Indus Sindh Pakistan who migrated thousands of years from Middle east and flourished it
and about the nuclear threat...IMF and IAEA will denuclearise these beggars
Looks like Afghanistan under Taliban would get stabilised and prosper before Pakistan does.
This was a useless podcast since we will never support those who will just shoot us
I think we can all agree..A stable pk means, more tension for India (azaad ksmir, blah blah) These talks are just done so, H indus or Indians in general feel guilty in order to "help pk", lets not forget, we are kuffars...So long pk! Goodbye!
Handover POK, baluchistan.....then we think trade,economy......
Only POK. We don't have it in us to deal with a demographic change.
And above all.. the nukes
Look at his arrogance
This is superior delusion of being a Muslim
don't help I repeat don't help. see those street interviews of joke pkstn. don't forget our crying & sacrifices. jai hind jai Bharat🇮🇳
But Pak Govt need to stop Terrorism for any trade possible. Also, medicine are going from India to Pak. Syed Salahuddin, Hafiz Saeed etc moving freely in Pal
Pakistan can try, but what's the benefit for India in establishing trade ties with Porkistan?
India does not need stable pakistan but need a pakistan that is broken in 4 states. I used to laugh even years ago when certain political leaders and bollywood personalities used to make this statement that stable pakistan is India need, when they used to fund every terrorist org that acted against India. That statement used to stand against every logic and data, but they used to make the stupid statement proudly nonetheless. I hope Indian govt continues current policy against pakistan and wait and watch what happens to it. If it breaks then we negotiate with govt of Sindh and Balochistan or if it continues in current trajectory then we are good as an economic pauper pakistan cannot fund terrorists.
Thanks...but no
4th law of newton : This law states that the logic and Pakistani is inversely proportional to each other.
The population is 250 million and growing. Sushant Sarin had said that their population centers are close to Indian border. How will we stop refugees from coming over? Moreover these will be a radicalized refugee group that can destabilize India even if 1 million manage to get in.
Refugee crisis will never happen as the west will always help them and even if it did they are more likely to go towards Afghanistan as they hate India more.
It is worrisome
During 71 refugees were 10 million
@@harshsaini9898It's because the borders were kept open by the government at that time, thank god now they are firmly shut.
@ss0498 No the Bangladesh border can't be fenced because the area is swampy. But the Pakistan border from Jammu to Gujarat is dry and is fenced. It's even visible from space. The only problem areas is Kashmir where it's mountainous and Rann of Kutch where it's swampy
Don't disturb your enemy when he is commiting mistake
India has so many internal issues to take care of, like unemployment, illiteracy, skill development, and infrastructure development ( that's the only area where the government is working effectively compared to other areas) inflation & many others. So, rather than focusing on dead horse , India should focus solely on its own development. Apart from that , as the national security state of pakistan, India can never trust pakistan as they have attacked 4 freaking times 1948, 1965, 1971, & 1999 and a series of terror attacks. So it's a large trust deficit , which is not easy to fill until they gain some sort of democracy instead of the current hybrid regime of pak establishment.
Thanks for making some sense. As an Indian, I didn't like the comment section filled by other fellow Indians. You can't upgrade by pulling others down. When I am proud of my country's progress, I don't think aiming for Pakistan's destruction is an Indian thing to do.
Helping pakistan will be like feeding milk to snake.
Pakistanis should worry about akhirat, hoor, gilma, sharab etc after death. That's the only purpose of life. A true momin won't worry about prosperity in this fani dunia.
Ola hu Uber 😂🕋☕☪️🤲🤲⚰🌋🔥☄☄ 💥 💥 💥
@@mulq555 Teaching of muhmmad baping minor girl 😂
@@mulq555 7000* by the way i don't support that cringe BS spam
@@mulq555 better than teaching of 1400 old paedo
He is educated articulate guy. Also he shared that failed Pakistan will be liability for India. We indians n our Government had Plan B to handle failed Pakistan. Already we resolved by making Bangladesh. Next time, it will be divided by 5 countries. Stable and developed Pakistan is more dangerous than instable Pakistan. Jai hind
A stable Pakistan is a bigger liability to the whole world .
This talks and interview have been started as step towards getting help from India. Don't fall for it.
They will never change mosad just yesterday caught 2 Pakistani terrorists that were coming to attack a shop in Mumbai so why we are talking about this delusional issue .They need to stop terrorism in their country first
When an institution like military has ruled a country for several decades and all other institutions failed to become potent then it's impossible for that country to become a democracy. Pakistan should stop aspiring for democracy and embrace military dictatorship. People will know whom to blame and other countries will know whom to talk to.
I recall Sushant Sareen-ji's tweet, "Imran Khan has left Pakistan in such shit that even the Army is not ready to take over." We just leave them there!
This Prithiraj Syndorme of Hindu majority India has to go do not forget what Quran says to Muslim when having upper Hand
Quran 47:35 :So be not weak and ask not for PEACE (from the enemies of Islâm), while you are having the UPPER HAND . God is with you, and will never decrease the reward of your good deeds.
Pakistan is disintegrating. India should allow this process to continue until the Pakistani people start demanding union with India. Only then should India help the Pakistanis.
I rely on my government, and i trust them. So i believe there will be no issue whatever the government or diplomats would think right for India. See, we are commoners, we see Pakistan a enemy and we have the right to think so. But ultimately the policymakers should make the decision, and we will support the government.
You have right to think
Islam is symbol of adhram and Ram ji gave example how to our adhrami neighbour Ravan
If india will give money to pak then india will also loose money like china...why nobody thinking this?
I strongly disagree with your view that prosperous Pakistan would be helpful to India.
Contrary, prosperous Pakistan is dangerous for India in terms of arrogancy of Pakistan at international forums, security at the borders, exploiting the situation geographically, etc...
Current scenario is really helped India in checking situation at borders east and west of Pakistan, handling of situation in Afghanistan, Chinese interference, etc etc.. globally Pakistan is completely isolated...
This gentleman should talk to Pakistan military establishment before he speaks to any Indian.He carries a chip on his shoulder and staying in US is not interested in the Indian subcontinent.he is glorifying the role played by Mr . Musharraf and tries to intimidate.
Madam you have wasted your time.
15:02 That's like arguing for an abusive and violent husband, sure he beats his wife but he also takes her to the hospital if the beating was too brutal. Garbage nonsensical ridiculousness like this needs to be countered, we should negotiate for lasting peace with elected governments and not dictators.
Habit never dies. Mindset never changes. India will be a fool of galactical magnitude if it helps Pakistan.
Whatever the western analyst has to say India should let Pakistan disintegrate. It is in our interest. Let it break abd fight amoung themselves.
I disagree with this pakistani journalist. Stable pakistan is not good for india either.
We can't help a nation which is pointing weapons on us. Throw your weapons and get help.
There is no reason to interview the guy from the other side. No need to help them. Let them stay where they are. Let them be unstable or otherwise, we are well prepared to deal with them. Let them not give crap and bull stories. No one will buy them, let alone India under our Honourable Modi Ji. The 3 reasons thst he mentioned are all their own doing. They are in their last leg. Let them dissolve into oblivion for good. Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.
India doesn't need pakistan. Don't spread the myth that a prosperous pakistan is required for India to progress. Pakistan actually needs to be cut down to size so that it stops being an irritant in South Asia..we would love to see a punjabistan with independent balochistan and Sindhu Desh with kpk going to Afghanistan.
How come there is a sudden change in tune of Wajahat?
Pak failed in 71 also .. a new nation was created. India needs to create new nation's from pak in future.
Yeh koi tareeka hai bheek maangne ka......!!!!
In short he is saying save us otherwise more terrorists will come .
Pakistan under TTP rule will be better than present establishment. India should alllow TTP to open a office in Delhi same way as Qatar allowed Afghan Taliban to open a office in Doha.
The enemy of your enemy is not always your friend. The TTP are terrorists. India should never support them.
Nah, Qatar should allow a ttp office like it allowed Taliban office. Let the infestation stay that side of the border only 🙏🏼
Over obsession on anything is bad. Same is the story of Papistan from Kashmir to Kashkol(Katora). Karma rebounds.
9:47 pakistan was going to be the next " Israel " was the best line
meanwhile pakistani passport - this passport is valid for all counties in the world except " Israel "
Israel ka i bhi nehi ban sakta hai 😂😂 with there mazabi knowledge
*INDIA don't need converts. Bhaarat koi dhamshal nhi*
I want the stuff this guy is high on ' Stable Pakistan is good for India". Really?
Historically a stable Pakistan is a constant nuance. Pakistan elite's Hindu/India hatred is which stops them from any cordial relations.
Remember pre Modi era? We were kind of habitual of hearing news of bomb blasts continuously on different Indian cities. It is only in last few year instability in that Islamist country we are safe from Jihadist activities.
Five Pakistan will solve its problems itself. Let them fight for who takes nuclear, water fights and kill between them???
Pakistanis like Pervez Hoodbhoy, Syed Muzammil, Zarrar Khurro, and now Wajahat Khan don't have problems with Nehru's India or Romilla Thapar's version(s) of Ancient Indian history because it was tailored to the narrative independent India was delivered with. Pakistanis are petrified by Modi-Ji's India, because (a) it has taken India beyond their reach; (b) growing numbers of Indian Muslims have begun adjusting their lives within the mainstream; (c) better education levels among Muslim women has generated wealth for them and resulted in lower birth rates; (d) no preferential treatment is given to Muslims except in non-BJP ruled states; (e) most Pakistanis believe a Sanatani India will avenge the hate and violence they unleashed on the "Hindu" community since partition; maybe it will? Meanwhile, Zia's brand of political Islam has spawned "nafrat" and grown illiteracy that has clouded the ability of Pakistanis to see beyond their noses!
If Pak PM SS says their country wants relationship with Bharath, immediately their FM billorani says - no need of Gujarat Butcher, their army chief says only after Kashmir dispute resolved, their oppo leader says only after Indian J&K freed & deputy fm says Bharath is going to attack fakistan. Finally there's no connection between country & their president.
Based on whose word, Bharath can step forward....?
no, we should not care about it. just like the russia Ukraine BS
Hand over all the terrorists and then we can think about it. Until then nope
We dont want to help
" Kale Arbi"..
Pakistan did fundamental mistakes in every step of their governance. In these many years, name a thing which was done correctly.
Unstable pak is in world interest
They shouldnt help Pakistan till Pakistan vacates PoK completely
On of the false narrative spread about Shree Rama is that he Killed Shambuka (a Shudra) because he was performing religious & the Brahmans considered it unacceptable.
He was doing a Tapa, Tapa can include many many things, One can do Tapa for wrong reasons also.A child d!ed due to that act of Shambula hence he was punished. Shambuka was k!lled because he committed a crime, a child d!ed because of his action and hence he was k!lled.
Shambuka was not k!lled simply because of his varna he was k!lled because of his actions
India should send multiple tons of grass to Pakistan. Because their leader said during the 70's that Pakistani will eat grass if food is not available.