What do you think about these Avid Pro Tools future updates and features? Let us know in the comments, and don’t forget to like and subscribe for more content like this. Shop for new and exciting recording gear here 👉 sweetwater.sjv.io/vNeqDO
Ironically some of the "Pro Tools new features" are just borrowed from Steinberg, one of their biggest competitors. I made the switch to Nuendo and it's hilarious to see Avid touting technology from them.
the price is the biggest issue with protools. $1,500 for a perpetual license. Studio one just went to $199 for new users and logic is $200. For me there isnt anything protools has to justify the price.
Thanks MItch for stopping by the Avid booth! I’m excited to see more ARA apps being implemented inside PT! These features speed up workflow and productivity. Also, nice MIDI updates! +1 in hopes that hardware delay compensation will eventually be automatically calculated in a future update. Keep up the great work, Avid!
It’s cool that they’re adding features, I just wish that they’d fix the current issues. For instance, in a project (not session) if you collaborate on a project and you add even a single marker, it deletes all other markers for every other person on the project… rendering using “projects” useless for post. This is one of many issues I wish they’d fix before adding more features.
that transcription is gonna be such a game changer! I was just thinking how much i want this in a DAW since it's already in davinci resolve and other video editors. I work with podcasts and TH-camrs on top of music, this will save me so much time.
its been the authority on audio for years. it was never geared towards production. they are trying to bring more producers to pro tools and its necessary for them now.
Yes and no. I think there was a very clear need and use case for loop record to playlists for audio when it was introduced, but the same feature in MIDI was/is far less valuable. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a cool feature, but when you can manipulate every aspect of a performance after the fact with zero loss in quality-as you can with MIDI-being able to loop record it seems like a justifiably low priority. And, realistically, how many people that actually use MIDI today have a need to capture and comp the actual nuances of what they’re performing in? I think 99% of MIDI is getting quantized 100%. Haha EDIT: You’ve always been able to record MIDI while looping a section of your session, just like you would in an MPC or other DAW. “Loop Record” in PT refers to a specific record behavior for audio, mainly used to easily generate takes for comping. …just in case that’s causing some confusing here.
@@jonautry I was about to mention what you said when you edited. I used to always quantize my midi, but I usually don't anymore. If I do, it's minimal. I think MIDI comping works great, you can do it in Logic Pro.
If pro tools take the spectral layers from steinberg it s means that their are the best to unmix track or stems separator..so if you got cubase you are on point😅
@ I have no cracks of PT or any other software for that matter. It frustrates me that I’ve spent 10’s of thousands on computers/plugins over the years and PT is still buggy as hell
Omg! Are you kidding???? Spectron layers had been in Cubase for a while and I though Pro-tools was ahead of the game!🤐🤐🤐😙😙😙😙😙😙 I'm going back Cubase Fuck it!
@@josueemmanuelleaguillonque9822Since we are dealing with legacy based software… to simply select multiple tracks and move one fader to move multiple faders would be nice or a simple quick link command like in Cubase.
@@josueemmanuelleaguillonque9822I’d say selecting multiple tracks and only moving one fader or a quick link command like what’s in Cubase would be nice!
Drag and drop session audio to a sampler is fucking huge-and of course, long overdue. But better late than never, I say. As a side note, I like that he’s suggesting that it’s a feature that previously existed, but was lost in the 64-bit transition. 😂 It’s my understanding that it was a clever workaround/exploit to an RTAS flaw. In fact, wasn’t Structure the *only* sampler that ever did it? (Not drag from Finder, drag from session timeline.)
Just got Studio One 7 pro. $20 a month for full access to all Studio One plugins, updates and upgrades. Protools Pro is $100 a month. Studio One 7 and other DAWs such as Cubase and Logic have the same features as the new ProTools for a fraction of the price. So why bother with Protools…?
because people think protools is better, its not, and more importantly: many studios use it, so they can "talk together" with their "projects". That saves time. And as many studios stupidly enough spend so much money in PT they are reluctant to change. And their client expect them to have it. For non-studio owners there is no reason to use it unless you have a lot of money or just like it. I think its ok. Super slow and resource hungry, so I will never use it in my little studio, but if you love it for what it is, and have the hardware to run it, its not the worst.
@@HR2635 I am a 63 yo music tech and producer. A little history of Protools…. Built by Digidesign in the late 80’ early 90’, Protools was meant to replace the film tape dubbers in its primary form. For that industry, it was a revolution, but in mine, music production, it meant disaster. In my studio we had a 24 track 2’’ Otari tape recorder with Dolby SR. That was the pinnacle of sound quality in the 90’ and early 2000. Protools sounded better than those film dubbers but was awful for our industry as it ran in 16bits 44,1… The converters were very bad and noisy and the system could only run on top of the line very expensive Mac. The system crashed at least 5 times a day with about 10 minutes of reboot process. In 1996 I worked with Protool in our film facilities. Had no choice as it was the only standard in those times and the audio files were encrypted … it took years before the system use .wav or .aiff format. It was awful, slow and unstable. There was a raging war between Apple and Digidesign as both companies were updating their OS without checking inter compatibility with each other. It was an international monopoly and dynasty in all big facilities that lasted about 20 too long years. I am very glad that this is over now. Cheers !
@@HR2635pro tools is better in anything audio! I guess all avid and pro tools haters are EMP producers who just need a little focusrite interface and one set of shitty monitors. But if you need to record a band for instance and if you use outboard hardware inserts, pro tools is the only sensible way to go. If you don’t need pro tools, don’t use it and go ahead and use your daw of preference.
LOOKS GREAT. i USE PROTOOLS AND STUDIO ONE. I IMPORT PROTOOLS SONG INTO STUDIO ONE MATER PAGE. CAN PROTOOLS CREATE A MASTERING PAGE? THEN I DON'T NEED TWO DAWS. I PREFER PROTOOLS. THANKS!
for some people subscription is absolutely IMPOSSIBLE / so I wouldn't recommend them to finally introduce the subscription ONLY option (they brought back the choice - thank heavens / but that's FOR NOW) / the community showed Avid and Waves that subscription ONLY is UNACCEPTABLE and people will simply leave them forever!
In the last years Pro Tools has lost a lot of what made it so unique! Avid tries to keep up by integrating 3rd party software, but the more stuff they put in, the more confusing and buggy it becomes! I also get the impression that this company no longer knows which user target they are trying to address. What I see here is practically a copy of Cubase / Nuendo and is ridiculous! This year is the first time I will not renewing my support plan for my Ultimate version! Far too expensive! Most of the additional things offered in these updates are not really needed by anyone!
tbh you don't need to upgrade every year, I'm still rocking 2022.6 - I'll get the upgrade maybe this year just so I don't fall too far behind but I'm not desperate for it
ALL RIGHT!!! Pro Tools is finally getting features from other software that the other software already had without a Pro Tools endless money milking scam. I mean subscription. Look! It's also getting the ability to use the "lite versions' of that software which for just more money become the real version of the software. Oh but WAIT THERE'S MORE!!! For your endless payment to Avid you'll get.... wait for it... MIDI editing!!! OMG!!! And when will you get it? Well the guy from Avid doesn't want to commit to, say the next year, or ever really. But in the meantime if you really want all those features you could just get them in free and low cost DAWs and just get the free or low cost plugins. Just sayin
I like it really i love your video of blues jam Mitch i like that kind of videos ❤❤❤😊😊😊i love songs like weren't for the wind Ella Langley ❤❤i think i sing that song and play it with my guitar at the bourbon blues street bar e boogie i hope this 2024 my dreams it comes true to play guitar with her its my dream i love USA and Nashville ❤❤🌟🌞🌞🎸🎸😊😊😊I love sweetwater your videos keep me company guys really ❤❤❤😊😊
Imagine you pay a team of developers to make a software for you and those people buy the software from somewhere else instead of making it themselves. They spend their vacations in a beautiful place for 2 years then they return home and give you a software from another company which you could also buy if you wanted. These people have no respect for you, they don't work and they don't really care about you. This year they gave it to the fence: S1, Logic, Pro Tools, they took it on a path of ARA extensions instead of working on their products. THIS IS LAZINESS :)))
Pro tools team has been hard at work. Bringing all the cut down versions of Steinberg software to a version of Pro Tools they don’t even know when it will be released lmao 😂 while Studio One 7 has mind blowing features which were just released. Why are there even videos still made on Pro Tools is beyond me. 20 years in the music production scene and I’ve not really seen any really upgrades to Pro Tools since version 9. 🤷♂️
I heard Protools was the industry standard some years ago and downloaded the free version. Saw it was a monthly subscription. Uninstalled immediately 😂
The only thing is Avid negleted to care about the competition. They told themselves they're the best and by the way did not follow the new industry move being the home studio market. People record now aday in their bedrooms than inside big studios...
Dear Pro Tools: why not add something that is useful to classical musicians, or any musicians who do not record to the grid: source-destination editing. The only DAWs that have this are Pyramix and Sequoia, both of which are really expensive and Windows only.
pro tools blows. still trying to catch up? why every studio uses this shitass stuff is beyond me. hate that eco system and this is my living for 30 years. sooory not sooory.
Fact: They don’t have to talk about release dates anymore since they are no longer a publicly traded company. Anyways, this vastly overpriced dinosaur of a DAW is not offering anything new or exciting. Gone are the days of using only one DAW and Avid needs to realize it.
3rd party add ons are awful. My email is still getting spammed from having to register the so called $2000 worth of free software codes from 3rd party companies with my protools perpetual purchase.
Someone who hates pros like me and running my business. recording industry artist without the (“ industry standard”) thinking about coming to pro tools and when I look to see what’s new and I’m soooo bored with y’all I just can’t
Genuinely, what would switch me to protools is one thing: copy logic’s midi editing. It’s the best and every other way is inferior, slow and infuriating.
I don’t like them trying to partner themselves back into relevancy . Just continue being the best mixing daw until your eventual demise . Get out of the way
This company is a dinosaur. The licensing whores are getting decimated. Kids don't use it either, so Ableton and the others will make Avid look like the boomer software it always has been; historically unreliable, behind on features, expensive. So long Avid. PS: The digidesign control surfaces make the new control pads look like dogshit. You are downgrading things for users and selling them as upgrades. Not bright...
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
What do you think about these Avid Pro Tools future updates and features? Let us know in the comments, and don’t forget to like and subscribe for more content like this. Shop for new and exciting recording gear here 👉 sweetwater.sjv.io/vNeqDO
Ironically some of the "Pro Tools new features" are just borrowed from Steinberg, one of their biggest competitors. I made the switch to Nuendo and it's hilarious to see Avid touting technology from them.
@@SweetwaterSoundcheck Avid is a certified Dinosaur.
Pro Tools using Steinberg. That's a Plus. Very very good.
the price is the biggest issue with protools. $1,500 for a perpetual license. Studio one just went to $199 for new users and logic is $200. For me there isnt anything protools has to justify the price.
The speech to text AI tool is an excellent example of how AI can be useful. It shows that it's not all doom and gloom or a threat to artistry.
Thanks MItch for stopping by the Avid booth! I’m excited to see more ARA apps being implemented inside PT! These features speed up workflow and productivity. Also, nice MIDI updates! +1 in hopes that hardware delay compensation will eventually be automatically calculated in a future update. Keep up the great work, Avid!
Better options for many of us. Avid shot themselves in the foot years ago.
Speech to text feature on vocal tracks is awesome
It’s cool that they’re adding features, I just wish that they’d fix the current issues. For instance, in a project (not session) if you collaborate on a project and you add even a single marker, it deletes all other markers for every other person on the project… rendering using “projects” useless for post.
This is one of many issues I wish they’d fix before adding more features.
that transcription is gonna be such a game changer! I was just thinking how much i want this in a DAW since it's already in davinci resolve and other video editors. I work with podcasts and TH-camrs on top of music, this will save me so much time.
Combining third party software is not an upgrade, avid.
Yes it is. Increasing the efficiency of workflow is crucial for engineers. All professionals know this.
yeah that was the weakest thing mentioned. the transciption and midi playlists and input monitoring for midi were huge though.
New iOS update too now
Yes, it is.
It really is though...
The fact that they’re JUST adding loop record for MIDI is mind boggling 7:11
its been the authority on audio for years. it was never geared towards production. they are trying to bring more producers to pro tools and its necessary for them now.
Yes and no.
I think there was a very clear need and use case for loop record to playlists for audio when it was introduced, but the same feature in MIDI was/is far less valuable.
Don’t get me wrong, it’s a cool feature, but when you can manipulate every aspect of a performance after the fact with zero loss in quality-as you can with MIDI-being able to loop record it seems like a justifiably low priority.
And, realistically, how many people that actually use MIDI today have a need to capture and comp the actual nuances of what they’re performing in? I think 99% of MIDI is getting quantized 100%. Haha
EDIT: You’ve always been able to record MIDI while looping a section of your session, just like you would in an MPC or other DAW. “Loop Record” in PT refers to a specific record behavior for audio, mainly used to easily generate takes for comping.
…just in case that’s causing some confusing here.
@@jonautry I was about to mention what you said when you edited. I used to always quantize my midi, but I usually don't anymore. If I do, it's minimal. I think MIDI comping works great, you can do it in Logic Pro.
MIDI Playlists > Lets Go!!! 🔥🔥🔥
Yet we are still manually calculating hardware insert round trip delay times 😡. Avid is so frustrating. Forced to use it
The sad thing is that by the time they update to the latest version, Apple will update to an operating system that won’t handle the new version.
😂😂😂
Some of these features came out in the 2024.10 update. Albeit, simple. But they’ve released it.
If pro tools take the spectral layers from steinberg it s means that their are the best to unmix track or stems separator..so if you got cubase you are on point😅
Steinberg, those people are away in advance than many other daw developers out there,
Cubase is the BEST !!!!
Can we add a feature that makes it not crash every 15 seconds
Don't use a cracked version😅
@ I have no cracks of PT or any other software for that matter. It frustrates me that I’ve spent 10’s of thousands on computers/plugins over the years and PT is still buggy as hell
Still no batch region export or bounce?? I'm done with AVID.
Just bought Nuendo and I don't think I'll regret it!
@@gregormarini Nuendo and Cubase are the BEST !!! Period !!!!!
Omg! Are you kidding???? Spectron layers had been in Cubase for a while and I though Pro-tools was ahead of the game!🤐🤐🤐😙😙😙😙😙😙 I'm going back Cubase Fuck it!
Cubase is the BEST PERIOD !!!!!
Batch export is missing. Batch export is missing. Batch export.
The best daw in the game
Demorou mais está evoluindo , parabéns Avid antes tarde do que nunca .
Welcome to PT 2024, the best karaoke machine ever!
Cool stuff!
Can we please move multiple faders at once without creating groups in 2024?
mmm how would you suggest to be able to do that?
@@josueemmanuelleaguillonque9822Since we are dealing with legacy based software… to simply select multiple tracks and move one fader to move multiple faders would be nice or a simple quick link command like in Cubase.
@@josueemmanuelleaguillonque9822hasn’t studio one done this with VCA’s?
That's super easy by assigning a VCA fader to a group. VCAs are way more useful in my opinion
@@josueemmanuelleaguillonque9822I’d say selecting multiple tracks and only moving one fader or a quick link command like what’s in Cubase would be nice!
Drag and drop session audio to a sampler is fucking huge-and of course, long overdue. But better late than never, I say.
As a side note, I like that he’s suggesting that it’s a feature that previously existed, but was lost in the 64-bit transition. 😂 It’s my understanding that it was a clever workaround/exploit to an RTAS flaw. In fact, wasn’t Structure the *only* sampler that ever did it? (Not drag from Finder, drag from session timeline.)
Can't wait 🔥🔥😎
great Mitch
Switched ton nuendo in COVID! Not looking back.
Just got Studio One 7 pro. $20 a month for full access to all Studio One plugins, updates and upgrades. Protools Pro is $100 a month.
Studio One 7 and other DAWs such as Cubase and Logic have the same features as the new ProTools for a fraction of the price.
So why bother with Protools…?
Industry bro. Industry. lol.
because people think protools is better, its not, and more importantly: many studios use it, so they can "talk together" with their "projects". That saves time. And as many studios stupidly enough spend so much money in PT they are reluctant to change. And their client expect them to have it. For non-studio owners there is no reason to use it unless you have a lot of money or just like it. I think its ok. Super slow and resource hungry, so I will never use it in my little studio, but if you love it for what it is, and have the hardware to run it, its not the worst.
@@HR2635 I am a 63 yo music tech and producer. A little history of Protools…. Built by Digidesign in the late 80’ early 90’, Protools was meant to replace the film tape dubbers in its primary form. For that industry, it was a revolution, but in mine, music production, it meant disaster.
In my studio we had a 24 track 2’’ Otari tape recorder with Dolby SR. That was the pinnacle of sound quality in the 90’ and early 2000.
Protools sounded better than those film dubbers but was awful for our industry as it ran in 16bits 44,1… The converters were very bad and noisy and the system could only run on top of the line very expensive Mac. The system crashed at least 5 times a day with about 10 minutes of reboot process.
In 1996 I worked with Protool in our film facilities. Had no choice as it was the only standard in those times and the audio files were encrypted …
it took years before the system use .wav or .aiff format. It was awful, slow and unstable. There was a raging war between Apple and Digidesign as both companies were updating their OS without checking inter compatibility with each other.
It was an international monopoly and dynasty in all big facilities that lasted about 20 too long years. I am very glad that this is over now.
Cheers !
@@HR2635pro tools is better in anything audio! I guess all avid and pro tools haters are EMP producers who just need a little focusrite interface and one set of shitty monitors. But if you need to record a band for instance and if you use outboard hardware inserts, pro tools is the only sensible way to go. If you don’t need pro tools, don’t use it and go ahead and use your daw of preference.
When will you make it possible to activate the license on the machine id ? I'm tired of using an extra flash drive to run the program
how about something really simple, FONT SIZE ? UI overhaul, ?? i can't read these tiny clips names, marker names, etc...
Avid is too slow, we are in 2024 but seems they don’t know.
Embarrassing and hard to watch.
wow Spectral Layer nice to hear integration. 🙌🏼 I wish to use Steinberg audio plugins on Protools specially the Stereo Enhancer.
Can't wait to try Transcribe on Lorna Shore;)
4:00 he should have mentioned that at the beginning, I was wondering myself the whole time and was about to write off these features
Do Avid plan to make a stable version of Protools? Can’t wait
Don't remember last time mine crashed.
hell yea
LOOKS GREAT. i USE PROTOOLS AND STUDIO ONE. I IMPORT PROTOOLS SONG INTO STUDIO ONE MATER PAGE. CAN PROTOOLS CREATE A MASTERING PAGE? THEN I DON'T NEED TWO DAWS. I PREFER PROTOOLS. THANKS!
Sorry we missed you Mitch.
for some people subscription is absolutely IMPOSSIBLE / so I wouldn't recommend them to finally introduce the subscription ONLY option (they brought back the choice - thank heavens / but that's FOR NOW) / the community showed Avid and Waves that subscription ONLY is UNACCEPTABLE and people will simply leave them forever!
We ever getting Stem separation like other Daws?
Avid sub licence steinberg technology. Wow!
In the last years Pro Tools has lost a lot of what made it so unique! Avid tries to keep up by integrating 3rd party software, but the more stuff they put in, the more confusing and buggy it becomes! I also get the impression that this company no longer knows which user target they are trying to address.
What I see here is practically a copy of Cubase / Nuendo and is ridiculous!
This year is the first time I will not renewing my support plan for my Ultimate version! Far too expensive!
Most of the additional things offered in these updates are not really needed by anyone!
tbh you don't need to upgrade every year, I'm still rocking 2022.6 - I'll get the upgrade maybe this year just so I don't fall too far behind but I'm not desperate for it
A lot of stuff that I don’t need. How bout the latancy on hardware
ALL RIGHT!!!
Pro Tools is finally getting features from other software that the other software already had without a Pro Tools endless money milking scam. I mean subscription.
Look! It's also getting the ability to use the "lite versions' of that software which for just more money become the real version of the software.
Oh but WAIT THERE'S MORE!!!
For your endless payment to Avid you'll get.... wait for it...
MIDI editing!!! OMG!!!
And when will you get it?
Well the guy from Avid doesn't want to commit to, say the next year, or ever really.
But in the meantime if you really want all those features you could just get them in free and low cost DAWs and just get the free or low cost plugins.
Just sayin
I like what’s coming. When is it coming? And please find another Word other than cut down. Makes it sound cheap.
I like it really i love your video of blues jam Mitch i like that kind of videos ❤❤❤😊😊😊i love songs like weren't for the wind Ella Langley ❤❤i think i sing that song and play it with my guitar at the bourbon blues street bar e boogie i hope this 2024 my dreams it comes true to play guitar with her its my dream i love USA and Nashville ❤❤🌟🌞🌞🎸🎸😊😊😊I love sweetwater your videos keep me company guys really ❤❤❤😊😊
Are they brothers?
😎
well if it ain't the ole dinosaur pro tools
spectralayers support is huuuge i use it all the time
I'm not quite sure what spectralayers is, but does it also have the ability to 'clean any notes' that shouldn't be part of the specified layer?
Imagine you pay a team of developers to make a software for you and those people buy the software from somewhere else instead of making it themselves. They spend their vacations in a beautiful place for 2 years then they return home and give you a software from another company which you could also buy if you wanted. These people have no respect for you, they don't work and they don't really care about you. This year they gave it to the fence: S1, Logic, Pro Tools, they took it on a path of ARA extensions instead of working on their products. THIS IS LAZINESS :)))
How did Avid Manage to made Presonus More Advance than them
:)))
The only features you needed from Steinberg are ARA and Variaudio
They are internal functions that are not for sale.
After all these years, still haven't even developed a click track/clip automatic panner window switching...
Logic pro X been doing ARA
Very interesting
Left Pro tools years ago 🤦🏽♂️
Me too. In early 2000.
Pro tools team has been hard at work. Bringing all the cut down versions of Steinberg software to a version of Pro Tools they don’t even know when it will be released lmao 😂 while Studio One 7 has mind blowing features which were just released. Why are there even videos still made on Pro Tools is beyond me. 20 years in the music production scene and I’ve not really seen any really upgrades to Pro Tools since version 9. 🤷♂️
I heard Protools was the industry standard some years ago and downloaded the free version.
Saw it was a monthly subscription. Uninstalled immediately 😂
industry standard just means: many use it. Its not because its better. Its not.
Cubase is the BEST PERIOD !!!!
Stem separation? Keep it simple please.
Please certify Sequoia instead of working on partner tool integrations. I need my $5k carbon to work on something newer than Ventura.
Man vst support
The only thing is Avid negleted to care about the competition. They told themselves they're the best and by the way did not follow the new industry move being the home studio market.
People record now aday in their bedrooms than inside big studios...
99,99%
Avid is like look other companies plugins lol upgrade
Dear Pro Tools: why not add something that is useful to classical musicians, or any musicians who do not record to the grid: source-destination editing. The only DAWs that have this are Pyramix and Sequoia, both of which are really expensive and Windows only.
pro tools blows. still trying to catch up? why every studio uses this shitass stuff is beyond me. hate that eco system and this is my living for 30 years. sooory not sooory.
Fact: They don’t have to talk about release dates anymore since they are no longer a publicly traded company.
Anyways, this vastly overpriced dinosaur of a DAW is not offering anything new or exciting. Gone are the days of using only one DAW and Avid needs to realize it.
INSAANE
3rd party add ons are awful. My email is still getting spammed from having to register the so called $2000 worth of free software codes from 3rd party companies with my protools perpetual purchase.
Things are getting way too convoluted and confusing
people from europe go crazy about speech to text. wow
Ara support 😂 wtf
:)))
Someone who hates pros like me and running my business. recording industry artist without the (“ industry standard”) thinking about coming to pro tools and when I look to see what’s new and I’m soooo bored with y’all I just can’t
Genuinely, what would switch me to protools is one thing: copy logic’s midi editing. It’s the best and every other way is inferior, slow and infuriating.
Pro Tools sucks.
🥱
Avid is the enemy of musicians. Having to pay a yearly $300 ransom in the name of a subscription is ludicrous and has me migrating to other DAWS.
I don’t like them trying to partner themselves back into relevancy . Just continue being the best mixing daw until your eventual demise .
Get out of the way
Protools getting into the ripping off other people's work?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
This company is a dinosaur. The licensing whores are getting decimated. Kids don't use it either, so Ableton and the others will make Avid look like the boomer software it always has been; historically unreliable, behind on features, expensive. So long Avid. PS: The digidesign control surfaces make the new control pads look like dogshit. You are downgrading things for users and selling them as upgrades. Not bright...
yawn
Man vst support