ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ก.ย. 2010
- Victoria Line 1967TS 3114
(This is an Victoria Line Train to Brixton)
Seven Sisters (National Rail)
Finsbury Park (Piccadilly Line & National Rail)
Highbury & Islington (London Overground & National Rail)
Date : Monday 13th September 2010 - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
![[TH] 2024 PMWC x EWC Main Tournament Day 1 | PUBG MOBILE WORLD CUP x ESPORTS WORLD CUP](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f5Coja1zCzo/mqdefault.jpg)
Thumbs up if you'll miss these trains.
there is no way you can miss a underground stock that is the same as the 1972 stock..................................
321 Bus route They aren’t entirely the same.........................
Noddy Mac ok..........................
Mustie_ YT true just pay a lot of money so the 1972 stock will be repainted TI the original 1967 stock XD didn’t think of doing that lol
I nevered ride the 1967 stock before
Always a guaranteed good sleep , missing your station so late for work and late getting home , as you are rocked , moved and enveloped by the sound and random movements !
The trains of my childhood :( R.I.P
Were the trains manually operated or ATO protected?
@@MalaysianAviator737-8 ATO
Sadly I never got to ride the 1967 stock trains
Same. Though I like 2009 stock more
don't worry 72 stock is still a thing
This part of the route was always very fast. A lot of the time at full capacity towards Kings X it would have to slow it self down a few times. There was also like a roaring echo caused by resonance. Miss these trains, they had character.
i hate those old trains lol
@@Farleigh1050 You probably like the new Plastic pieces of shi-
@@TheUnknown313 bruh they aren’t (s)
Whats resonance?
Would u want it to come bavk
is it just me or do the 1972/73 stock trains not have this same vivid sound despite the same underlying structure
No the 72 stock sounds the same
They're vastly different
The 72 stock probably don’t reach the same speeds as the bakerloo line as the 67 did on the Victoria line. That’s prob why they sound different
F me can’t believe I made this Neeky comment 4 years ago 😂😂
xD 🤣
Great video. I never actually got to ride these trains before they got upgraded
Bruuuhh..sorry man
.the loud thunderous noise and the scary motor were like music. I miss them so
Same and RIP
I rode them when i was like 2 / 3 / 4 years old but don't have any other memories except a time I went on a school trip and happened to hop on this stock.
Your profile picture made me cry 😂 LOL
I wouldn't call what happened an upgrade, as that's quite subjective, I prefer the term replaced.
4:03 the best part for me
Awwwww how I miss the 1967 stock... I grew up on these!
Really miss the '4' seating arrangements. These things were still fast too.
By the way, anyone reading, I don't remember these trains doing it but the Piccadilly line trains, when pulling out of a station sometimes jerk, with a loud 'thock' sound. What's that? The doors not resetting? Safety feature probably?
Pity there wasn't a Piccadilly train exiting Finsbury Park at the same time, you see it opposite in the tunnel for a while, quite close, freaks people out I think.
Nice vid.
Sorry I'm 9 years late, but here's an answer: That jerk is a problem on many different lines. Usually it is to do with someone leaning on the doors and therefore the train stopping accelerating, as the doors were no longer fully closed.
@@ElectroRailNo worries. 9 years, still about. All makes sense, cheers, 'thocks' still happen a lot, oh well. I've grown to like the new Vict stock looks wise and the performance is crazy. G-force defying torque and braking like off a supercar.
Piccadilly line needs a reboot. Sometimes I think the drivers are using pedal power...
On another note, I miss the D78 stock off the District line. I haven't been to America but when I was on those it felt like I was on a New York subway.
To boot, I have a functional HO model of the District R Stock 1949 to 83, the one with the curved bottomed sides, what a beauty.
See you in another 9 years haha, all the best.
@@LikeMindedIncident Jesus, still active after 9 years? Now that is a TH-cam veteran
I miss the four seat transverse seating too. Now just the Bakerloo line and that hardly gets up to speed! Metropolitan too but where's the bumpiness, nah far too smooth!
@@LikeMindedIncident Are literally all tubes brand new now? Or does the Central Line still has the '92 stock?
the 1967 stock have so much character
And have a more powerful engine than the 72 trains
@@Great_WesternTVFan u mean traction motor?
@@Enviri Yes. And there's other things why the 1967 stock is more powerful than the 72 ones
Probably because the 1967 stock is ATO
@@Great_WesternTVFan not really as both were uing the same LT115 DC motor. The 1967s appeared faster since they operated with ATO rather than the manually driven 1972 stocks.
Some of the 1967 stock had ex Northern line 1972mk1 stock cars converted to be compatible and placed in the middle as they did not have automatic driving equipment.
The 1972mk1 stock was basically a crew operated version of the 1967 stock.
The 1972mk1s were ordered in a hurry to help out the 1959 stock to cope with high demand for Northern line services and there were not enough trains.
They were rushed off the factory production line, hence why they look identical to each other but the 72mk1s had longer windows, guard control panels and fluorescent lights.
*Replaced 1938 stock as well
My childhood right here. R.I.P
Great video on 1967 Stock
The announcements on this one sounded so relaxing compared to the current ones.
Edit: anyone know whose voice it is?
It’s almost asmr
They sound unenthusiastic like the central line 😐
emma clarke. same as on the central line
same voice for the d stock and 1972 stock
Emma Clarke for the old 1967 stock, and Sarah Parnell for the current 2009 stock
Very fond memories although i seem to remember countless problems commuting in the mornings during the 80’s. Big respect for the 09 stock, their frequency and speed are amazing and i really miss living in walthamstow just so i could ride them all the way home
RIP 67 STOCK 1967-2012 press F to respect
*2011
Even though I haven’t been on it I will pay my respects F
F
1968 - 2011*
F
Dont worry.. we still have the bakerloo line 😁😁
Miss these 1967 trains 😭.
They could have transferred them to the bakerloo
Yeah. These were in a lot better condition than the 1972 stock. WAY more faster as well
Even these were in better nick than the Bakerloo line's newer 1972 stock have ever been. They should have kept them longer than they did. They were good reliable trains.
So where the D stock the best that london undergrond had
You have to admit, the 2009 stock benefitted the Victoria line way more than the 72. The Victoria line now reaches 36 trains an hour during peak times. That would not have been able on the 72 stock
@@jay-ti5js you mean 67 stock
Tube Time What was the maximum number of trains per hour the Victoria Line reached when it was entirely 1967 Stock?
I agree. They have a more powerful motor I noticed
Great video .
I know :( I wished the Victoria line had an opened station
Pl
@X2K9 you mean outside?
R.I.P
1967 stock
1967-2009
Died of Sadness of new train
Nice video.
I miss my childhood tube train.
Great vid, 10/10.
I miss these trains :( I agree they had lots of character (but so do the 09s :D)
Some people want there to be a new one built at Northumberland Park-near the depot
that is the bakerloo line and inside , the train where the line was .it was blue
victoria line had it first
This is 1967 ex Victoria line stock.
The Bakerloo line uses the 1972 stock.
Most are mk2s with a few ex Northern line 1972mk1 trains converted to driver only operation and refurbished.
They are combined as half units with the mk2s as one train.
@MitsukoshiProduction i kno :) thanks for ratings :D
It would have been insane if the bakerloo line had the 2009 stock though.
@BusesinLondon96 thanks
I do miss the 1967 stock. Its great we still have the 1972 stock on the bakerloo line
A few former 1972mk1 Northern Line stock are also on the Bakerloo line as half units and complete trains. They have the black rubber soles on the door windows and the windows are longer than the mk2 set
@@oludotunjohnshowemimo434 ooooohh I acc didn’t know that, next time I take the Bakerloo line, I will have to look out for that. Thank you for the info.
Miss these I first rode them in 1987
they should bring these back if you ask me!
@@Great_WesternTVFan The 1967 stock is objectively one of the best tube stocks in history. They were groundbreaking when introduced, especially considering they were the first trains to use ATO. 2009 stock is alright but i don't think anyone really cares about them.
@@clemthomas6964 Well they did have asbestos in them which is extremely dangerous so maybe the trains shouldn't be brought back... did really like the trains tho, im gonna miss these
@@ElectroRail The asbestos would be under the train, not inside so there wouldn’t be any risk to the passengers
@@matthewsmith2787 I know that, but the thing is that means they're gonna have to be very careful with any units that they are scrapping, so that they don't disturb it.
Shame you didn't film the whole journey to Brixton
Memories from childhood, wish these stayed instead of the 1972 tube stock.
Kinda agree. The 67 stocks were far more powerful than the 72 trains
@@Great_WesternTVFan I believe the 1972 stock could get up the speeds as the 1967 stock. The main reason for the 1972 getting slower since they are manually driven on the Bakerloo line.
@meridian222017 thank you :)
Which stock is using now on the Victoria line and in 2011?
Now it is the 2009TS, in 2011 it was a mix of the 1967TS and 2009TS trains.
2009TS
From Late 2011, there are all 2009 stocks. But between Late 2009 to Early 2011, there are mixed
Good video, but this unit is 3114 (7114 is a D stock).
@OLADELE MUNKTALA Because it's a d stock
I Saw This Train On the Victoria line When I Was Five
I can see that victoria line was supposed too look like dear old Bakerloo, that is before they changed to Bombardier Movia aka 2009 stock.
Love how she says Brixton in the announcements
The more powerful version of the 72 stock
Are you sure? I think they have the same acceleration datas.
@@Michael-jv1mq do they,? I've heard this ones more powerful, and I remember it being less jittery. But who knows
@@bb-3653 Maybe that's right. Because the 67TS can reach 50 mph. But the fact is that it has the same traction control. Maybe it has one throttle position more. The 72TS definetely has a shunting pos, series pos and a parallel pos.
@@Michael-jv1mq iirc I heard the 72 stock is slower cuz the Bakerloo line running tunnels are older and can’t support faster speeds like the Victoria line tunnels can
The bakerloo line has a max speed limit of 45mph but the trains can do over 50, they rarely hit 45 though because the stations are close together
It means great video X2K9
@polishslacker bcuz it just came out of Northumberland Park Depot
I miss this train stock
Es ruckelt und die Tuube rast durch den Tunnel wie 2010 einfach herrlich ;)))
i miss the 1967 stock
Dhr Tol? th-cam.com/video/X2BLmPJmZ4k/w-d-xo.htmlsi=nqW28G9kf3ajEMz9
Right now, the only old london underground stocks that are remaining are the 1972 and 73 stocks. The rest are the modern ones.
How you feel those trains getting replacement with the new 2024 stock?
@@killeranime3591 good
The Victoria line is not entirely underground as Northumberland Park depot is above ground. The Waterloo and City is the only tube line to run entirely underground as the depot is also underground. Great video by the way, I traveled on these a lot before they retired.
no victoria line is underground aswell apart from the Northumberland park depot
OwenR10 shut up
Dont count every depot is on ground
No this is patrick Wrong. The Waterloo & City Line depot at Waterloo is the only underground depot on the entire network
@@OwenR10 did you even read the comment?
@astock5000 Thanks :D i must of been typing to fast lool
I wished they brought the 1967 stock of the Victoria line train on the central line, they did for the short time, but I wished they put them on the central line, but the Victoria line were automatic, the signals would not work, I like the 1962 stock, but I wished we had some 1967 or 1972 on the central line like the Northern line did
Those old tube are so old school
I miss 1967 stock😭
I miss the 1967 Stock R.I.P. 1968-2011
The victoria is like bakeroo line
It's looks like the bakerloo line but the seats and poles are different
I know the first one (Seven Sisters) is cut-and-cover, but are there any open air stations?
Seven Sisters is deep level. All Victoria Line stations are, and there are no open air stations on the line at all.
Northumberland Park depot is the only part of the Victoria Line in the open air
I like the north bound of 1967 from Kings Cross to Highbury and Islington, because it’s going up diagonally North East and you hear the long sound of the engine, I did record it on my iPhone and put it on laptop, but my laptop is broken, but I will go and fix it and try to put on TH-cam as well, you will know what I mean with the long sound of the engine.
Wait this victoria changed into 2009 stock
I miss those trains glad similar ones are still on the Bakerloo for now. I hate the news trains no style.
And at Piccadilly
+Sebastian Kiszkis Piccadilly doesn't have the amazing departing sound
rectorman1 The S stock are piles of Tack. The 09 stock is okay. The 95,96 stock are good. The 92 stock is great. The 72,73,D,C and A stock are great trains.
Traction motors.
Great traction motor: 1992, 1996, D, S stock.
Second great traction motor: 2009
I don't mind: 1973 and 95
Least favourite: 1967/72 stock.
Lubdhak Das that’s just hurtful saying that the 1967 and 1972 tubes your least fav motor really? I don’t care or yeah I like all motor sounds forever! Be more careful what you say now say sorry to those 1967 tubes I have enough!
Woah it’s quite bumpy to highbury & islington
I remember once I was bumped off my seat. And I'm not that light!
Didnt they used to run on bakerloo line before the 72 stock?
No. 67 Stock were always on the Victoria Line, and ran on ATO from Day 1 of the Line operating
Except when they went to the Hainault loop on the Central Line as new for testing
I think the Woodford to Hainault route
God I miss these, the 72's are nowhere near as fun as in comparison, trackwork is too slow
Much better than that pile of rubbish on the line right now, those 1967 stock has better seating, better quieter PA, and were built to last another 40 years.
oh please
They were good but the 2009 Stock is a GOOD replacement for them. They suit modern needs for the Victoria Line likes extra trains per hour at peak hours
36 trains per hour would not have been possible if 1967 Stock stayed!
Chiltern Transport Productions nah I prefer the 67 stock
Harry Foley They’re more hellfire, definitely. But as they had to go, I think the right tube stock were chosen to replace them
What we have now is operationally better but not nearly as fun as before 2011
Chiltern Transport Productions so your saying you like the 67 stock but at the same time you don’t?🤔
Why do the 1967 stock, c stock, 1972 stock, 1973 stock and the d stock all sound the same?
IDowney1988 They must have the same motors or something
QuarioQuario54321 they were all built by metro cammel with the same motors
@@jamtart606 was the class 315 and 321 are from metro Cammel?
Lubdhak Das I think there from British rail engineering or something like that, also they made 92 stock, the worst underground train of all time
@@harryfoley2294 shut up!
I do!
Look so modern for 1967. Even Washington DC Metro 7000 Series look older
1. no they don't
2. no one asked for american trains
@@lamborghinihexagons5502 3. I'm joking
4. I like train around the world but I'm aiming at Thailand at this moment because their development in train are very fast.
They were heavily refurbished in the 90s
@@matthewsmith2787 no wonder they look so clean. like a new train
@@alpzepta As i Thai person, i absolutely don't have a single clue why would anyone be interested in our newer trains. (and including the fact that they were delayed for years.) The most recent stock is the Hitachi trains on the red lines and they aren't even that remarkable. I guess the 2 monorail lines are kinda cool but their stock seems pretty generic for a monorail line.
You put national instead of national rail next to Highbury & Islington
1967 stock is the oldest London underground Victoria line
It was the first one to run on that line
The A stock was the oldest, then the 1967, then 1972 then 1973
Is a 1967 stock
Plese bring 1967 victori line plese
Anyones from geoffs video?
Looks like bakerloo line
The 72 stock was heavily based on the 67 stock but 72 stock doesn’t have automatic train operation
This announcement sounds like Bakerloo line 7:08
Same voice: Emma Clarke
Looks like a 1972 stock
00:04:02 R.I.P off the one
*Me hating the underground*
"NEW LINE"
"ELIZABETH LINE"
"NEW UNDERGROUND SERVICE"
*Me:TF WHY-*
*I only hate the normal underground not Elizabeth line ill do a video off when i go on it!*
When was this?
2010
1:01 quiet
1:02 loud
I prefer the new ones
Lubdhak Das #09stockforlife
Lubdhak Das W you are no older than 10, clearly
@@harryfoley2294 th-cam.com/video/79mdzFhG6UM/w-d-xo.html
@@harryfoley2294 th-cam.com/video/wQYob6dpTTk/w-d-xo.html
@@harryfoley2294 why are you so annoying?
The same as the 72 stock
No, the 67 had ATO while the 72 doesn't.
@@Sean-D78 Whats ATO
Well they’re very similar.
@@harshalhosany2 Automatic train operation
just to say the 1972 and the 1967 stock look alike
jonster the monster They come from the same family, along with the 1973 stock
But the 1967 stock has a more powerful engine
4:05
GV
no the Victoria Line in Entirely underground
Comments 032
201
032 011
Comments 201
Comments 032 011
Why did the Victoria line train look the bakerloo line train
The bakerloo line trains were made in a rush so they used the same design as the 1967 stock
She’s very loud this girl 😈
leonard ssenkindu accelerates nicely aswell
@@MalaysianAviator737-8 word for an old train I remember these having violently rapid acceleration , these were my favourite when they were about. I'm sure they were more smooth than the 72 stocks
@Leonard Ssenkindu good memories?
@Leonard Ssenkindu nice story mate
@@MalaysianAviator737-8thanks
That’s not the Victoria line that’s the bakerloo line
Seth's Stuff it is Victoria Line
@@Great_WesternTVFan calm down
@@Great_WesternTVFan u can u dont have to be angry over nothing
Seth's Stuff it’s the Victoria line!!
If you pause at 0:17, the train says Brixton and on the side walls, you can see a blue line going above the station name. You can also see the little blue “Victoria line” banner on the front door window.
When you enter the train, the poles are literally blue. On the Bakerloo line, they are brown. At 0:41, the announcer literally says “This is a Victoria line train to Brixton.”
Every clue in the video screams this is 100% the Victoria line, yet somehow you still manage to conclude that it’s not the Victoria line and that it’s the Bakerloo line… how do you arrive to such a conclusion?