After riding again more recently it has grown on me haha, I still don't really care for the stock handlebar setup personally, but that is easy to adjust and/or change! As with anything I have ridden in the 950 series from Yamaha, it is a great bike.
@@moronsmorons8913 I am 195 cm and it fits well, legs are in a natural riding position and with a flat seat it is easy to move around after an hour or so riding.
@@moronsmorons8913 I am about 77 Inches or 194-195cm and I find it comfortable. If you ride any long distances I recommend replacing the seat, as I have done on most of my motorcycles. Most seats from the factory are not the best for riding on for more than an hour or two. The handle bars that Alex talks about can be easily switched. Some people complain about vibration in the bars, but bar end weights can easily fix that cheaply.
at 6'4" 250 with a 32" inseam the SCR is my bike and probably the best choice in the modern retro or standard bike category. While the Ducati and the Triumph are probably better scramblers, they're also smaller bikes with less forgiving seating for a bigger guy. I think people need to look at the SCR and forget the idea of scrambling and think of it as a standard that could be a flat tracker(and proven so) if you want something dirt oriented. Don't get me wrong, you could "Scramble" with this thing but the clearance is something that would need to be addressed pronto as many people on the SCR950 forums have already discovered that frame dents come easy.
Gerhard Symons if I’m not mistaken the xsr is a triple, and a powerful one at that. The SCR is going to ride the same as a Yamaha bolt, torquey lowend providing all the fun you could want around town and highway but you’re going to feel weaker past 75 mph. I really wanted the xsr, it’s sexy as hell and quite powerful but my heavy ass always felt like I was bottoming it out, let alone the riding position forced me to ride like a wind sail due to not having a bench to move my butt back. Ive tried the seating on the ducati(too small) and the triumph was doable but the SCR’s are going for about 4K cheaper before fees so the cost to bike ratio is way off. I realize I kinda misrepresented my point, I don’t think he SCR is the best modern retro out there, that probably goes to Kawasaki’s new 900 or the XSR or hell even BMW’s R9T but all of those are either extremely size or wallet prohibitive. Just an FYI I picked up my bike for roughly 5k before taxes and registration with 17 miles on it.... if anyone is interested in the SCR they should go for them now before stock runs out, dealers are pushing them.
Well said, and yes it would definitely be a much better choice if considered in the standard category instead of lumped in with scramblers haha. Very well said!
Arguably, belt-drive systems do not belong in the dirt due to rocks/pebbles getting into the pulleys. Also the fact belt-drive systems have very short wheel travel when they aren't equipped with a tensioner pulley (some people remember the Buell had an idler/tensioner).
Want tell you what too buy . And I haven't had experience with one as of yet . But from a late 40s age guy and looking back I don't think it would be a bad bike if you have Motorcycle experience off road. And for 3500 that's a deal
This helps a lot - looking for my first bike and I love the scrambler look and reviews that say ride height is comfortable, etc. I love cafe racers too, but not sure that would be comfortable for long rides. Anyway, I loved the way the 950 looks and assumed since it's yamaha that it would be awesome.
Oh, yeah it's one of the best looking bikes ever made! Huqsvarna has a similar look, i mean of course it's different but pretyy unique looks , these bikes, better looking than even scramblers.
I'm exactly your size. I've owned it for two years now and it's good, especially for the price. I'm amazed at how many compliments I've gotten on it. It looks sharp, especially on the pipe side. Good luck!
If it’s low mileage and looks nice that’s not a bad deal, I’d say a used one should be in the $4k-$4500 range reasonably, but if it’s low enough mileage and you like it that’s not bad
@@adriansaucedo2290 congrats on the bike. Make sure you figure out how to sync the throttle bodies (really easy after you watch some videos) then you're golden. You're going to love that bike.
Absolutely, I just put it on the list! I don't have one on hand right now so I'll either have to wait for one or do a review with pictures haha. I've ridden them for years.
Triumph Street scrambler looks smaller. I like Bonneville line of motorcycles more then Yamaha, but with my 190cm hight I think I might look a bit disproportional on it. The SCR950 is less sexy on it's own but I think the whole package (with me on it) will look better then Triumph. I should try both of course before making the conclusion, but looking at photos with tall guys on them I think Yamaha wins.
I have a chance to get a 2017 still in the showroom for $4487.00. I looked up MSRP and it sold new for $8690.00. I'll have to check out the fit for me as you explained. Is 4487 a good price for this? Thanks.
Duties honest review and everything's negative that seems really honest you're supposed to give a reviews of the khans and the pros and then let the viewer decide
Aw, shoosh, Alex...now you've got me looking at Yammies! I will want to see the RE review when you get it, though...so far their bikes are looking good and at a great price point, but some of the reviews have been shaky on fit and finish and reliability. (But you could say that about damn near any bike if you pick it apart enough...)
Yeah the final fit and finish on some of the RE bikes has been shaky, but so far any of their bikes that has had any "issue" from the factory they have been willing to take care of in a timely fashion. So yes they have had some past fit and finish issues in quality control, mostly cosmetic, but they have brought on some good Japanese quality control professionals and are getting it under control. I expect the Himalayan to be solid.
I liked your honest review. Pros: Beautiful looking bike. Great power train. Cons: Uncomfortable seat. Brakes are better suited for kind of off road, lacking for street riding. 545 pounds....way too heavy for off road. ' Needs a tad bigger fuel tank. Having to fill up before you go empty....fill around 120 miles. The more I looked at the bike, the more I wanted one. Sitting on the bike changed my mind in a hurry. There's a good reason they only made it one year. Barry
I agree that the SCR is not one of the best Yamahas out now. I demo rode one with my wife last year and didn't like it at all. It vibrated alot, not enough power and alot of handlebar vibration at around 55 to 60 mph probably due to the weird ass knobby tire on the front.
you said many times how it doesn't FIT you. You could have said it once. You did not say HOW it didn't fit though! bars too close or far? pegs too high, low, forward or rearward?? Too tall?? Basically, though you do come off as a nice, straight up guy, the video was a dud. Redo! I know you can do it.
Yeah for guys like me to pick it up for 3-4k off of MSRP ;) I thought it was a neat bike in 17, but could not justify the price compared to a Bonneville Scrambler considering it's much weaker and utterly useless offroad....don't ask how I know this...
a bike that looks like a 125 but with 900cc ! btw Alex why do people say 400 or 600 ccs are starter bikes lol I have a 135 cc and i'd say it is a starter bike and enough for the city! I mean of course 400 is nice but a 900 would be better for long distances eh ?
thnking of upgrading ot at least a 400 a bit confused if to go for duke 390 or new huqsvarnas to be launched soon, honda 250 rr is not available here :/ yamaha r3 , eh not vfm here rn, kawasaki is only 250, ninja 400 i guess yet to be launched, but i prefer nakeds
Haha Yeah I usually recommend people start with a 250cc or 300cc if at all possible. It is very hard to find 125cc bikes here in the States. A 400cc is plenty for most applications, but of course yes goind with a bigger motor like a 900 makes it easier to ride longer distances comfortably.
Also look at the Royal Enfield Himalayan if it will be available in your area...I think it hits a really good sweet spot in that 400cc range scrambler naked type bike
I just found this bike for sale for 4500$ Canadian dollars with only 5000 km on it. I might buy it I donno. For that price who cares if it’s a little funny, it still a Yamaha
The seat on the SCR is as hard as a rock, it's almost like you're sitting on a seat made out of stone but otherwise it's a cool bike, my Bolt's seat is better.
I've owned a Royal Enfield. More often than not I had to walk the piece of shit home. At least with the Yamaha you don't have to call your buddy for a tow everytime you take it out.
Do you know you've got your hat on back to front? Its a homage to proper old school scramblers..ducati is purpose built as is triumph...do.your research
Foot pegs need to be more forward Definitely it’s very uncomfortable to ride I’m 5 foot 10 and on a long ride it would be very uncomfortable if the foot pegs were further forward like more like a cruiser bike it would be much more comfortable and I would definitely buy one
Thank you very much for the constructive criticism, and you are absolutely correct, however difficult of a habit it is for the majority of us to break.
WTH?? It's a PIG if it is actually supposed to be ridden in the dirt? And not even 3" of rear travel? And what 150 miles range or so? I don't get it other than something to sell to ignorant riders who but what looks nice to them...same thing that has sold so many packing Harleys and what not...almost 550 llbs???? WTH?? What a porker! Oh yes and but a single rotor front brake?? WTH???
To me, this Yamaha is the dumbest, most ill-conceived, and ungainly bike to come down the pike in the last 40 years. You have to go back to 1983's Suzuki Madura to find something else that is as ridiculous as this bike is.
Own this bike, fits my 6ft 4 frame perfectly. Definitely not for shorter riders like Alex. Ride to work almost daily, over 1500 miles last month.
After riding again more recently it has grown on me haha, I still don't really care for the stock handlebar setup personally, but that is easy to adjust and/or change! As with anything I have ridden in the 950 series from Yamaha, it is a great bike.
How does it feel for taller person with long legs (I'm 188 cm). Still relaxed knee angle?
@@moronsmorons8913
I am 195 cm and it fits well, legs are in a natural riding position and with a flat seat it is easy to move around after an hour or so riding.
@@moronsmorons8913
I am about 77 Inches or 194-195cm and I find it comfortable. If you ride any long distances I recommend replacing the seat, as I have done on most of my motorcycles. Most seats from the factory are not the best for riding on for more than an hour or two. The handle bars that Alex talks about can be easily switched. Some people complain about vibration in the bars, but bar end weights can easily fix that cheaply.
I'm 5'8 and flat foot it, idk what you're on about.
My brother has this bike and honestly...one of the best motorcycles ive ridden
I think it definitely is if people will give it a chance haha, most people that hate on them have not ridden one
at 6'4" 250 with a 32" inseam the SCR is my bike and probably the best choice in the modern retro or standard bike category. While the Ducati and the Triumph are probably better scramblers, they're also smaller bikes with less forgiving seating for a bigger guy. I think people need to look at the SCR and forget the idea of scrambling and think of it as a standard that could be a flat tracker(and proven so) if you want something dirt oriented. Don't get me wrong, you could "Scramble" with this thing but the clearance is something that would need to be addressed pronto as many people on the SCR950 forums have already discovered that frame dents come easy.
Which other bikes did you look at? I have the XSR900. I dont know the engine of the SCR950 at all.
Gerhard Symons if I’m not mistaken the xsr is a triple, and a powerful one at that. The SCR is going to ride the same as a Yamaha bolt, torquey lowend providing all the fun you could want around town and highway but you’re going to feel weaker past 75 mph. I really wanted the xsr, it’s sexy as hell and quite powerful but my heavy ass always felt like I was bottoming it out, let alone the riding position forced me to ride like a wind sail due to not having a bench to move my butt back. Ive tried the seating on the ducati(too small) and the triumph was doable but the SCR’s are going for about 4K cheaper before fees so the cost to bike ratio is way off. I realize I kinda misrepresented my point, I don’t think he SCR is the best modern retro out there, that probably goes to Kawasaki’s new 900 or the XSR or hell even BMW’s R9T but all of those are either extremely size or wallet prohibitive. Just an FYI I picked up my bike for roughly 5k before taxes and registration with 17 miles on it.... if anyone is interested in the SCR they should go for them now before stock runs out, dealers are pushing them.
Well said, and yes it would definitely be a much better choice if considered in the standard category instead of lumped in with scramblers haha. Very well said!
Check out the Ducati Scrambler 1100 for better "room" and power.
Lifted_Above for the price you could pick up the 1250 kit with a tune for the bolt and probably pull close to 100 hp out
Arguably, belt-drive systems do not belong in the dirt due to rocks/pebbles getting into the pulleys. Also the fact belt-drive systems have very short wheel travel when they aren't equipped with a tensioner pulley (some people remember the Buell had an idler/tensioner).
Near me is a brand new 2017 scr950 for $3500 should I get it? It will be my First street legal bike.
Want tell you what too buy . And I haven't had experience with one as of yet . But from a late 40s age guy and looking back I don't think it would be a bad bike if you have Motorcycle experience off road. And for 3500 that's a deal
Never owned a Yamaha. One of these was for sale in my area. A 2017 and the price was right, but after seeing so many negative reviews, I passed on it.
This helps a lot - looking for my first bike and I love the scrambler look and reviews that say ride height is comfortable, etc. I love cafe racers too, but not sure that would be comfortable for long rides. Anyway, I loved the way the 950 looks and assumed since it's yamaha that it would be awesome.
I just bought one 2017 yesterday... and I love it...
The RE Himilayan is a 400cc with only 21hp. Reliability issues as well.
Whats your point?
The word you are looking for relating to how the bike fits a person is ergonomics.
Alex. Make a review on honda cb1000r. That is one sexy bike. But I want your point of view about that bike. Is it better than bmw r90..?
Oh, yeah it's one of the best looking bikes ever made! Huqsvarna has a similar look, i mean of course it's different but pretyy unique looks , these bikes, better looking than even scramblers.
Absolutely, I'll put it on the list! I have to get my hands on one though haha
They should have moved the pegs a bit further forward to make it a better standard. Like the moto guzzi v7
Curious about the “fit”. I’m about 5’ 10” and a half. Little lanky with long limbs.
I'm exactly your size. I've owned it for two years now and it's good, especially for the price. I'm amazed at how many compliments I've gotten on it. It looks sharp, especially on the pipe side. Good luck!
very nice i wish it was mine...classic standard motorcycle with a cool engine.all brand should have a retro LOW PRICED line
Seeing a low mileage used one for 4800. What do you think
If it’s low mileage and looks nice that’s not a bad deal, I’d say a used one should be in the $4k-$4500 range reasonably, but if it’s low enough mileage and you like it that’s not bad
Doesn't it only sit like 3" from the bottom? Damn, the Bolt must be low af.
Can i travel with this bike over 1000km ?
Yes. Why not? Seat may not be most comfortable, but that can be remedied.
I saw one of these today, guy put a brown leather seat and red fork boots on. I thought it was an early 80s bike with an amazing paint job. :)
It's a scrambler styled standard bike....your looking at it wrong...you should be comparing it to different bikes like , the motoguzzi v7 instead
Exactly.. this is a same bike as a Virago ... you can dress it up the way you want ...but it will remain a MOTORCYCLE
I have one right now and to be honest I’m not a big fan of the power thought a 950 would be a little faster.
Alex, what is your height & weight? Perhaps those numbers are why it did not fit you well- ?
Guys should I buy this or a 2015 c-spec?
I fit better on the C-spec and find it to be a better ride, but maybe we can hear from some other opinions as well!
Alex Simmons just bought it today! Fell in love with it!
Alex Simmons thank you!
@@adriansaucedo2290 congrats on the bike. Make sure you figure out how to sync the throttle bodies (really easy after you watch some videos) then you're golden. You're going to love that bike.
i had 05 r1, loved the looks of the bike but it wasnt for me. 10 bikes later i got fz09 it is best bike ever
like the way it looks, very stylish, but found it awkward sat on it at the dealers
The foot controls share the same position as the C-Spec, not the standard or r-spec Bolt. A little bit of research goes a long way.
Can you do a Yamaha Stryker review?
Absolutely, I just put it on the list! I don't have one on hand right now so I'll either have to wait for one or do a review with pictures haha. I've ridden them for years.
The pegs are not in the same position as the Bolt.
You're probably right, they just felt very similar and overall the positioning just felt a little off to me...at least for my personal preference haha
Certainly the kickstand is in a different place...behind the pegs
thanks for the honest review,like the bike but I have to agree with you on thr Duc and Bonnie
Triumph Street scrambler looks smaller. I like Bonneville line of motorcycles more then Yamaha, but with my 190cm hight I think I might look a bit disproportional on it. The SCR950 is less sexy on it's own but I think the whole package (with me on it) will look better then Triumph. I should try both of course before making the conclusion, but looking at photos with tall guys on them I think Yamaha wins.
I have a chance to get a 2017 still in the showroom for $4487.00. I looked up MSRP and it sold new for $8690.00. I'll have to check out the fit for me as you explained. Is 4487 a good price for this? Thanks.
Yes good price. I have a 2017 new leftover at a shop near me and they will do 4500 out the door
That's really good! Almost half price.
@@toothspic2 That's crazy good. A new bike...A 950cc new bike for $4500. What year is this 1979?? The poor dealer must have lost money!
hello and comfortable for a tall and heavy person?
Duties honest review and everything's negative that seems really honest you're supposed to give a reviews of the khans and the pros and then let the viewer decide
That one time we made a street tracker/scrambler out of a Bolt and Yamaha copied us...
Yeah that happened once...
Aw, shoosh, Alex...now you've got me looking at Yammies! I will want to see the RE review when you get it, though...so far their bikes are looking good and at a great price point, but some of the reviews have been shaky on fit and finish and reliability. (But you could say that about damn near any bike if you pick it apart enough...)
Yeah the final fit and finish on some of the RE bikes has been shaky, but so far any of their bikes that has had any "issue" from the factory they have been willing to take care of in a timely fashion. So yes they have had some past fit and finish issues in quality control, mostly cosmetic, but they have brought on some good Japanese quality control professionals and are getting it under control. I expect the Himalayan to be solid.
Where is this bike made?
Yamaha.... Japan...
I liked your honest review.
Pros:
Beautiful looking bike. Great power train.
Cons:
Uncomfortable seat.
Brakes are better suited for kind of off road, lacking for street riding.
545 pounds....way too heavy for off road. '
Needs a tad bigger fuel tank. Having to fill up before you go empty....fill around 120 miles.
The more I looked at the bike, the more I wanted one. Sitting on the bike changed my mind in a hurry.
There's a good reason they only made it one year.
Barry
I agree that the SCR is not one of the best Yamahas out now. I demo rode one with my wife last year and didn't like it at all. It vibrated alot, not enough power and alot of handlebar vibration at around 55 to 60 mph probably due to the weird ass knobby tire on the front.
Off course the ducati will be better it costs twice much, yama is people with a good taste but with in a budget, ducati is luxury...
And Incase you missed it it’s taller yes taller that’s ryt taller, you heard it taller, much taller
you said many times how it doesn't FIT you. You could have said it once. You did not say HOW it didn't fit though! bars too close or far? pegs too high, low, forward or rearward?? Too tall?? Basically, though you do come off as a nice, straight up guy, the video was a dud. Redo! I know you can do it.
check out the 51 HP out of a 950 twin and you will know why this bike did not sell. I think most modern 650's have more...but perfect beginner bike.
now is 2019, you were right. Yamaha discountinued the model because was a failure. Another charismatic yamaha rejected by the market. Thanks. hugs.
Yeah for guys like me to pick it up for 3-4k off of MSRP ;) I thought it was a neat bike in 17, but could not justify the price compared to a Bonneville Scrambler considering it's much weaker and utterly useless offroad....don't ask how I know this...
It seems more of a modern retro bike , like moto guzzi v7 kawazaki Z900R than an actual scrambler.
It is for sure, basically a Bolt that has been dressed up in Scrambler skin haha
a bike that looks like a 125 but with 900cc !
btw Alex why do people say 400 or 600 ccs are starter bikes lol I have a 135 cc and i'd say it is a starter bike and enough for the city! I mean of course 400 is nice but a 900 would be better for long distances eh ?
thnking of upgrading ot at least a 400 a bit confused if to go for duke 390 or new huqsvarnas to be launched soon, honda 250 rr is not available here :/ yamaha r3 , eh not vfm here rn, kawasaki is only 250, ninja 400 i guess yet to be launched, but i prefer nakeds
Haha Yeah I usually recommend people start with a 250cc or 300cc if at all possible. It is very hard to find 125cc bikes here in the States. A 400cc is plenty for most applications, but of course yes goind with a bigger motor like a 900 makes it easier to ride longer distances comfortably.
Also look at the Royal Enfield Himalayan if it will be available in your area...I think it hits a really good sweet spot in that 400cc range scrambler naked type bike
Came here for the pointing 👉🏽👈🏽👇🏽
I just found this bike for sale for 4500$ Canadian dollars with only 5000 km on it. I might buy it I donno. For that price who cares if it’s a little funny, it still a Yamaha
They should have not called it scrambler and it is a nice looking bike
The seat on the SCR is as hard as a rock, it's almost like you're sitting on a seat made out of stone but otherwise it's a cool bike, my Bolt's seat is better.
Agreed
Not scrambler esh ! They try to bring back the flat tract bike .
in spamish please
I've owned a Royal Enfield. More often than not I had to walk the piece of shit home. At least with the Yamaha you don't have to call your buddy for a tow everytime you take it out.
You can move the foot pegs on this bike🤦♂️
Do you know you've got your hat on back to front?
Its a homage to proper old school scramblers..ducati is purpose built as is triumph...do.your research
Foot pegs need to be more forward
Definitely it’s very uncomfortable to ride I’m 5 foot 10 and on a long ride it would be very uncomfortable if the foot pegs were further forward like more like a cruiser bike it would be much more comfortable and I would definitely buy one
to tell the truth
Its not a motor...it's an engine...'Motors' are electric..these two words are not interchangeable.....
Thank you very much for the constructive criticism, and you are absolutely correct, however difficult of a habit it is for the majority of us to break.
Though you would think someone should tell the entire fossil fuel powered automotive industry that...”General Motors” and such... ;-)
Enginecycle doesn't have the same ring to it...
At Least if all ya gonna do is talk , DON'T stand in front of the bike the whole time, wow.
WTH?? It's a PIG if it is actually supposed to be ridden in the dirt? And not even 3" of rear travel? And what 150 miles range or so? I don't get it other than something to sell to ignorant riders who but what looks nice to them...same thing that has sold so many packing Harleys and what not...almost 550 llbs???? WTH?? What a porker! Oh yes and but a single rotor front brake?? WTH???
To me, this Yamaha is the dumbest, most ill-conceived, and ungainly bike to come down the pike in the last 40 years. You have to go back to 1983's Suzuki Madura to find something else that is as ridiculous as this bike is.
forgot to mention it is a heavier bitch than the bolt and the seat is absolute trash