Based on two quotes from Todd Howard, there might be no mods created for vehicles because they are NOT NEEDED. Exploration may be limited to a perimeter around your landing spot or outpost. It appears that the "landing area" might also be an "exploration area", beyond which you cannot go without returning to your ship and re-landing. If true, how large will this perimeter be compared to previous titles? We have no way of knowing until Bethesda clarifies this or we count out the running steps ourselves upon release. -- Todd Howard says: From Starfield Direct: "We love exploration and rewarding it, but you do explore differently in this game given its scale. That usually involves exploring an area you've landed in." From Todd Howard Answers YOUR Starfield Questions: "We hope everybody enjoys it for what it is, but it is an exploration different than we've had where you're landing, you're exploring around that landing spot and then you're probably going somewhere else." -- They will be planets from the perspective of orbit but.. in actuality you will only be landing here and there to collect this or that resource or to build an outpost and then you will be in Todd Howard's words.. "probably going somewhere else". Not a Skyrim on every planet. Not if there are indeed exploration perimeters around your landing spot. Area-wise, by counting running paces to equate to Fallout 4 or Skyrim.. these Starfield planets might be very small, and their comparative size will be difficult to ascertain because exploration will be tethered to your outpost or landing location. It is very important that people have this question plainly answered before release date. Otherwise, the release date conversation, all important to sales success, will be soured by disappointments which could have easily been avoided. We can be certain Starfield is going to be a great gaming experience. This lack of clarity about an exploration perimeter, however, will not be appreciated if players are left to find this out on their own. If there are indeed restrictive perimeters to planetary exploration, Bethesda should put to rest all speculation about vehicles and mounts as soon as possible. **
😂"Starfield will change gaming"😂 aldow the enemies show absolutely no sign of intelligence. they just stand around to get shot, anyone who would call this "combat" has no clue
You are right character creation is not that good. They should provide a height slider. The faces look plastic. The beards look drawn. The teeth are too perfect. The faces are completely symmetrical. The NPC renditions are disappointing overall. Other aspects of the game look very very good to me. Food? I don't care about the food. At all. ..
What I would like to know is they kept showing planet after planet, But why did they not show any with water? How does water look and act with this new engine they built? What do rivers, water falls and Oceans look like? How does the water act and react when we dig around it or build or explore around and in it? How do we even land or explore on Ocean Worlds?
Good point....yeah i dont really think their are any planets with oceans. We will have to see it ourselves on launch or maybe in any other upcoming video they put out
Pretty sure there was literally a river near the start of the 45 minute showcase, but even aside from that Neon City started as a fishing place of sorts I believe. Pretty sure that whole city is built atop an ocean and there's even official art showing as much. Besides, we've been able to swim in most if not all Bethesda games already, so I see no reason why they'd suddenly decide no water amongst +1,000 planets.
People will genuinely just never learn. We have seen next to nothing of the game. Please stop acting like that means the game is going to be amazing. They had a 45 minute direct and in that time thought it best to just talk about the game with some of the dev team. Why didn't they show more gameplay? Why didn't they even show a 3 minute uncut sequence of ANYTHING happening in the game? The video is well made and everything but perpetuating this hype is why we keep getting broken half finished games dropped on us that become playable 2 years later.
I am in no way ever gonna hype a game or ever ask people to buy the game at full price. After countless scams by companies like cypberpunk 2077,gollum,star wars jedi survivor,battlefield 2042 and many more....never gonna pre order any game. And yes i am already making a video on why this game can fail miserably. Thank you anyways for your comment
@@alternatecrabby dude, I just watched a video of you hyping the game. Granted it was more tame that most do but look at the title of the video.. "STARFIELD Will Change Gaming!!" I look forward to the next video! I'll give you a sub so I don't miss it 😀
They should have eliminated the food entirely. Imagine how much effort and resources they could have directed into a truly dynamic economy if they simply didn't waste their time with the food. ..
@@alternatecrabby Well look at some of those whales at the Direct. Food is a top priority with them. Sure I like to cook from what I hunt. I'm fine with that but no manufactured food. It is just needless clutter. They even make a slider for weight but not for height. I can't believe they did that. All women and men the exact same height? How is that supposed to look normal or realistic?
@@MrDavePed I dont even know why they would talk about weight so much when clearly height matters most. Its the most basic character creation ever made
Based on two quotes from Todd Howard, there might be no mods created for vehicles because they are NOT NEEDED. Exploration may be limited to a perimeter around your landing spot or outpost. It appears that the "landing area" might also be an "exploration area", beyond which you cannot go without returning to your ship and re-landing.
If true, how large will this perimeter be compared to previous titles? We have no way of knowing until Bethesda clarifies this or we count out the running steps ourselves upon release.
--
Todd Howard says:
From Starfield Direct:
"We love exploration and rewarding it, but you do explore differently in this game given its scale. That usually involves exploring an area you've landed in."
From Todd Howard Answers YOUR Starfield Questions:
"We hope everybody enjoys it for what it is, but it is an exploration different than we've had where you're landing, you're exploring around that landing spot and then you're probably going somewhere else."
--
They will be planets from the perspective of orbit but.. in actuality you will only be landing here and there to collect this or that resource or to build an outpost and then you will be in Todd Howard's words.. "probably going somewhere else". Not a Skyrim on every planet. Not if there are indeed exploration perimeters around your landing spot.
Area-wise, by counting running paces to equate to Fallout 4 or Skyrim.. these Starfield planets might be very small, and their comparative size will be difficult to ascertain because exploration will be tethered to your outpost or landing location.
It is very important that people have this question plainly answered before release date. Otherwise, the release date conversation, all important to sales success, will be soured by disappointments which could have easily been avoided. We can be certain Starfield is going to be a great gaming experience. This lack of clarity about an exploration perimeter, however, will not be appreciated if players are left to find this out on their own.
If there are indeed restrictive perimeters to planetary exploration, Bethesda should put to rest all speculation about vehicles and mounts as soon as possible.
**
I didn’t really know about starfield before this. Now I know lots of it thanks.
And nowww you knowww…join the gang
Stream when
soon
😂"Starfield will change gaming"😂
aldow the enemies show absolutely no sign of intelligence.
they just stand around to get shot, anyone who would call this "combat" has no clue
Huh? Their are many aspects of the game not just enemy behaviour my friend
You are right character creation is not that good. They should provide a height slider. The faces look plastic. The beards look drawn. The teeth are too perfect. The faces are completely symmetrical. The NPC renditions are disappointing overall. Other aspects of the game look very very good to me. Food? I don't care about the food.
At all.
..
Character creation was really nothing special tbh with you. But sandwiches 😋
@@alternatecrabby I suggest you make your own real life sandwiches which you can enjoy while playing Starfield. A healthy compromise 🤠
..
@@MrDavePed hahaha
Very informative, now become a Starfield cowboy and cook more videos.
Already cooking some amazing content
Sheesh , dope video
thanks bro
What I would like to know is they kept showing planet after planet, But why did they not show any with water? How does water look and act with this new engine they built? What do rivers, water falls and Oceans look like? How does the water act and react when we dig around it or build or explore around and in it? How do we even land or explore on Ocean Worlds?
Good point....yeah i dont really think their are any planets with oceans. We will have to see it ourselves on launch or maybe in any other upcoming video they put out
Pretty sure there was literally a river near the start of the 45 minute showcase, but even aside from that Neon City started as a fishing place of sorts I believe. Pretty sure that whole city is built atop an ocean and there's even official art showing as much. Besides, we've been able to swim in most if not all Bethesda games already, so I see no reason why they'd suddenly decide no water amongst +1,000 planets.
People will genuinely just never learn. We have seen next to nothing of the game. Please stop acting like that means the game is going to be amazing. They had a 45 minute direct and in that time thought it best to just talk about the game with some of the dev team. Why didn't they show more gameplay? Why didn't they even show a 3 minute uncut sequence of ANYTHING happening in the game?
The video is well made and everything but perpetuating this hype is why we keep getting broken half finished games dropped on us that become playable 2 years later.
I am in no way ever gonna hype a game or ever ask people to buy the game at full price. After countless scams by companies like cypberpunk 2077,gollum,star wars jedi survivor,battlefield 2042 and many more....never gonna pre order any game. And yes i am already making a video on why this game can fail miserably.
Thank you anyways for your comment
@@alternatecrabby dude, I just watched a video of you hyping the game. Granted it was more tame that most do but look at the title of the video.. "STARFIELD Will Change Gaming!!"
I look forward to the next video! I'll give you a sub so I don't miss it 😀
Starfield will be drowning in preorder players tears, that were created while they wandered the empty world Tod has made for them to MOD and "Enjoy".
You will not regret...thnx for the sub
Or you can play with game pass
They should have eliminated the food entirely. Imagine how much effort and resources they could have directed into a truly dynamic economy if they simply didn't waste their time with the food.
..
They really did put a lot of effort in food geometry for no reason. I guess they want us to eat more than fly in game
@@alternatecrabby Well look at some of those whales at the Direct. Food is a top priority with them. Sure I like to cook from what I hunt. I'm fine with that but no manufactured food. It is just needless clutter.
They even make a slider for weight but not for height. I can't believe they did that. All women and men the exact same height? How is that supposed to look normal or realistic?
@@MrDavePed I dont even know why they would talk about weight so much when clearly height matters most. Its the most basic character creation ever made