Top 10 Best Destroyers In The World | 2022

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 มิ.ย. 2024
  • In this video, we have examined the world's top 10 destroyers in the world
    VSB Defense is the world's first TH-cam channel founded for the purpose of comparing military forces of different countries.
    We review and rank the military forces (armies; land forces, air forces, navy forces, special forces and more) of more than 100 countries in the light of recent news.
    In this channel we rank and review the best, most expensive, fastest, strongest military vehicles, weapons, equipments, aircrafts, helicopters, carriers, destroyers, tanks, rifles, submarines and more, in terms of technological advancement.
    We keep an eye on recent military matters and make videos on recent news.
    If you enjoy these kind of videos, do not forget to subscribe to VSB Defense!
    ------------------
    VSB defense
    ✪ Subscribe: goo.gl/Yw7h55
    --------------------------
    |Sources|
    military-today: Website about modern warfare, military equipment and defense technology
    wikipedia: Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation.
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 1.5K

  • @Hunt_GG
    @Hunt_GG ปีที่แล้ว +38

    055即使装备有独步世界的射程1500公里的反舰高超音速导弹,那毕竟还是一艘中国的战舰,怎么能让中国战舰排第一呢?我看中国055能排第四也太抬举了,应该排十名开外!

    • @user-hb9vd8vh3u
      @user-hb9vd8vh3u 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      哈哈!那些幾十年前的破爛,永遠第一

  • @higgsboson9212
    @higgsboson9212 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    China's 055 probably the most formidable destroyer, it is the only destroyer deploying 10 mach high speed anitship missile with range over 1000 miles.

    • @xutongling5077
      @xutongling5077 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      of couse

    • @puppydude4308
      @puppydude4308 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No no no

    • @user-hj2dd5ou4r
      @user-hj2dd5ou4r ปีที่แล้ว +3

      中国057等离子隐身驱逐舰传出在造了,196个垂发,满载排水量1.8万吨

    • @flx2463
      @flx2463 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      🇰🇷+🇯🇵>🇨🇳

    • @user-vl9qk8ys5q
      @user-vl9qk8ys5q 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@flx2463日本有俄罗斯邻居,南北朝鲜也是邻居

  • @sk38962
    @sk38962 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome!

  • @leejack2478
    @leejack2478 2 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    055 is better than Burke III, even US navy themselves understand it !

    • @hermesliteratus882
      @hermesliteratus882 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      True, the US Navy openly admit it. And frankly, I wouldn't take the ranking of this video too seriously.

    • @TonyWang62
      @TonyWang62 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      055 is the best now.

    • @user-qk7gk4ni5w
      @user-qk7gk4ni5w ปีที่แล้ว +3

      我们是渔船,你们的是战舰

    • @user-qk7gk4ni5w
      @user-qk7gk4ni5w ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Russia🇷🇺 will nukke Porn#o West 是的呢,我们现在除了055,也只有另外三条带飞机的渔船了

    • @user-rj9vk9lw8v
      @user-rj9vk9lw8v ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@user-qk7gk4ni5w你是懂战忽局的

  • @user-wr6el6gr4x
    @user-wr6el6gr4x 2 ปีที่แล้ว +268

    type 055 is a fishing boat,not warship.

    • @user-wr6el6gr4x
      @user-wr6el6gr4x 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @Georgy Konstantinovich Zhukov that I agree.
      enemy.

    • @user-lt6ke9hg8f
      @user-lt6ke9hg8f 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @Georgy Konstantinovich Zhukov
      Our 055 is used in fisheries. . There should be no place for him on this list.

    • @user-lt6ke9hg8f
      @user-lt6ke9hg8f 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      @@user-wr6el6gr4x
      这群老外真好笑

    • @mr.grinchee3277
      @mr.grinchee3277 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I agree with your profound analysis. Type 055 is for fishing boat or stealing fish from the sea of other country worldwide. They use a bomb or cannon gun to catch fish illegally.

    • @user-lt6ke9hg8f
      @user-lt6ke9hg8f 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@mr.grinchee3277

  • @mingsong1491
    @mingsong1491 2 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    Zumwalt=Type055 >Arleigh Burke III >Sejong > Atago > Type 052D >Kolkata >Kongon > 45 Type > Aikizuki

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Vishakapatnam is already in the house. So is Maya Class
      And they are above Atago if not Sejong.
      Areligh Burke III enters service in 2023. Block 2 is well inferior to Kolkata.
      Zumwalt > Type055 > Sejong> Maya >Vishakapatnam >Atago>Type52D>Kolkata > Arleigh Burke II > Horizon

    • @morchang624
      @morchang624 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Type055 is just a military fish boat, my friend.
      I know the U.S next-gen DDGX are trying to copy Type 055, but actually, you have to admit that the U.S navy just wants to catch up with the new fish boat trend and upgrade their fishing industry.

    • @mingsong1491
      @mingsong1491 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@morchang624 Military fish boat,well,I love this nickname,It wasn't that long ago that I was worried about the US Empire forcing the fish boat down to the cruiser class, 😏. To Type055, the only problem is powerplant,it's electronics,even better than Zumwalt.

    • @mingsong1491
      @mingsong1491 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@morchang624 The Washington Naval Treaty, 1922, a treaty signed in Washington, D.C., between the five naval powers of the United States, Britain, France, Italy and Japan, on the limitation of naval armament. The main provisions of the treaty were: the ratio of the total tonnage of the main ships of the United States, Britain, Japan, France and Italy was 5.25:5.25:3.15:1.75:1.75. For the foreseeable decade, the U.S. empire will surely do the same thing, pulling China to sit down and do similar negotiations. Because an unrestricted naval arms race would overwhelm the finances of both countries, China would also be happy to see a slowdown in shipbuilding, because after 2025, the cost of building the Chinese 055 would rise from half of the current Arleigh Burke IIA to 80%.

    • @Absolut531kmh
      @Absolut531kmh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What kind of bias is this? The zumwalt focuses on ground targets more than surface targets.

  • @Mr68486848
    @Mr68486848 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    "AIKIZUKI" is misspelled.
    "AKIZUKI" is correct.
    There is no doubt that I am Japanese.

    • @anderskandersson4613
      @anderskandersson4613 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      アキズキ あきづき 😁
      おはようございます
      コニチワ
      こんばんは

    • @Godzilla-lo2ii
      @Godzilla-lo2ii 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@anderskandersson4613 That nice!

    • @Mr68486848
      @Mr68486848 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@anderskandersson4613
      sorry.
      You are right.
      AKIZUKI is wrong
      AKIDUKI is correct
      I'm not good at the alphabet....

    • @janusjones6519
      @janusjones6519 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      nobody cares

    • @devicex14maxx
      @devicex14maxx ปีที่แล้ว

      don't care

  • @danielluo7710
    @danielluo7710 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The only 055 with dual-band radar is behind a few old warships, hahahaha😂

  • @amos325
    @amos325 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Nice selection, I had a good laugh today

  • @leesungsoon3745
    @leesungsoon3745 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love this video youtube channel 😄👍

    • @user-qd2lv1it7w
      @user-qd2lv1it7w ปีที่แล้ว

      韩国宇宙第一,谁反对?我跟他翻脸

  • @stevegeorge5322
    @stevegeorge5322 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well Done!

  • @ironspirit3823
    @ironspirit3823 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    If you don't put type 055 as No.1, meaning you either have zero common sense of how mordern naval warfare goes, or you are just a totally not objective military channel

  • @cliffrunner
    @cliffrunner ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I feel rankings like this are usually misleading in assumption that those destroyers are having a 1-1 battle. In fact, those destroyers are unlikely to act by themselves in a real battle.

  • @stardestroyer-ko9zb
    @stardestroyer-ko9zb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice boats!🚤

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like this Destroyers

  • @veidorje1681
    @veidorje1681 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    they are all called FREGATES nowdays thanks 4 sharing : )

  • @hongyuzhou8935
    @hongyuzhou8935 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    055 is the most powerful destroyer as far by now.
    The most very first outstanding, but not one of them.

  • @anderskandersson4613
    @anderskandersson4613 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Maya Class is the latest and baddest of Japanese Navy JMSDF, currently 2 is in service.

    • @user-os2hl3fe5i
      @user-os2hl3fe5i ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Talking about the comprehensive combat effectiveness is that China's 055 destroyer is the most powerful! No matter radar or stealth system, as well as the complete set of weapons! The Arleigh Burke class destroyers are all products of 40 years ago! 055 is a product after 2015. Your ranking itself is fair!! Obviously, there are double standards in the United States from the country to the people!! Where can there be notarization?? It's like taking a bag of washing powder to hit a country!

    • @dipayansaha4101
      @dipayansaha4101 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@user-os2hl3fe5i what about new vishakhapattnam class destroyers ?
      Ins Visakhapatnam was commissioned in 2021 and ins murmugao will be commissioned in December 2022

    • @joshuaraewa-ay9684
      @joshuaraewa-ay9684 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dipayansaha4101 .....If I'm a buyer, I'll choose Renhai (Type 055) because all biases aside, it's the most gorgeous ship I've ever seen. No one can deny me that. And it's also a cruiser sized with large modules ready to be improved.
      Vishakapatnam is also an interesting choice for me, but I want a bigger Vishakapatnam, a cruiser sized before I can decide. But if you ask me between 052D and Vishakapatnam, I'll choose the latter.
      Anyway, biases aside, I would love to see more newer ships from Asia. Hope ASEAN can make its own version of destroyers.

    • @dipayansaha4101
      @dipayansaha4101 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@joshuaraewa-ay9684 ins murmagao is coming

  • @notsohandytim5090
    @notsohandytim5090 ปีที่แล้ว

    A far cry from the leftover WWII Tin Can I resided on back in the '60s when we were still trying to figure what a drone was.

  • @ketefe9562
    @ketefe9562 2 ปีที่แล้ว +106

    Type055 has the most powerful firepower which 112 the biggest missile silos that can hold 448 missiles and the most advanced radar which the only warship in the world has an integrated radio frequency system. The tonnage and stealth performance is second. Type055 overall performance far exceeds Zumwalt and Arleigh Burke Class and junk Sejong the Grea.

    • @Big-O43
      @Big-O43 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      HAHAHA Chinese junk that does not work very well, the 055 will crap itself in a real confrontation. Most Chinese made things are first stolen tech from someone else, second poorly reengineered and produced.

    • @ketefe9562
      @ketefe9562 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      ​@@Big-O43 Yes, China always steals what you don't have. All companies sanctioned by the United States against China have advanced technology than the United States. Just like the United States sanctions Huawei’s 5G technology that the United States does not possess.How is it useful? The U.S. still has to pay Huawei 5G patent fees and Huawei's 6G technology is still far ahead.

    • @Big-O43
      @Big-O43 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ketefe9562 Keep on dreaming, chinese produce crap, always have, always will. If they cant copy or steal western tech, russia then gives them their junk tech. China cant even keep a disease contained in a lab, infected the entire world, many wonder if that was on purpose !

    • @ketefe9562
      @ketefe9562 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@Big-O43 China is not as backward as you think. Even in time during the simultaneous blockade of the United States and the Soviet Union and its allies, China's technology was not backward and also could build fighter jets and artificial satellites. In addition, to use well-known knowledge does not constitute theft, just as you speak English, it cannot be said that you have stolen just because you are not British.

    • @Big-O43
      @Big-O43 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ketefe9562 Right, yet they keep making junk and unleashed a virus on the world that many believe was done on purpose ! I'll give ya that they are the best on spying and stealing from others. What about the sub par steel that they make that when is collapses hurts others, the poison in plastic that was used to make childrens toys the list can go on and on. China cant design anything technologically advanced without stealing the ability or russia giving it to them. They put out more propaganda than N Korea and Russia combined. You want to talk about their human rights issues also, the Nation is a joke !

  • @skyllline24
    @skyllline24 2 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    China's type 055 is the best ocean fishing vessel.

    • @user-yx8bo6pv4d
      @user-yx8bo6pv4d 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Yes, as a Chinese, I agree with you. and I think India is the most powerful countries in Asia.

    • @user-zhoujin
      @user-zhoujin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@user-yx8bo6pv4d 扯淡,大韩民国是最强大的国家

    • @user-hf4do1zm9i
      @user-hf4do1zm9i ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@user-yx8bo6pv4d 三哥亚州第一,韩过宇宙第一

  • @ThatsMrPencilneck2U
    @ThatsMrPencilneck2U 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Ships "weigh" anchors; they "displace" tons.

  • @arianfeizy6389
    @arianfeizy6389 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for Persian subtitle

  • @4m33rsgame4
    @4m33rsgame4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Wow nice editing on cn type 055 adding double gun 3 seahawk heli

  • @Trac1992
    @Trac1992 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Sejong The Great class have length is 167 meters

  • @martinroberts4391
    @martinroberts4391 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    6 type 45 destroyers and 180 crew

  • @funnyman3510
    @funnyman3510 ปีที่แล้ว

    🔥

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like this strong destroyers

  • @reconnaissance12xx
    @reconnaissance12xx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    세종대왕함이 넘버2야? ㅇ0ㅇ

  • @ALWH1314
    @ALWH1314 2 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    Sejong is a larger version of Burk, same VLS, radar and most weapons, Zumwalt is an experimental failure and it’s more a land attack platform not destroyer with strong ASW. All three use single band 4.3 meter radar and old SM2 or 6 missiles. Older Burk radar is passive, only new block 2A and yet to commission block 3 have active array radar, I don’t know which Sejong has. How can these be better than 055 dual band 5 meter active array radar, larger size VLS and hypersonic missiles? I get you don’t want to be politically incorrect to praise Chinese, I suggest you should just omit both Russian and Chinese in your review instead of technically bias.

    • @discordmoderator313
      @discordmoderator313 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Type 055 has 112 VLS cells, whilst the Sejong the Great Class has 128 VLS cells, making it the most heavily armed warship bar the Russian Kirov class battlecruisers. At least get your facts right dude.

    • @MrRuoxi
      @MrRuoxi ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@discordmoderator313 when you have a beast hand but a near sighted eyes, how could you be stronger

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 ปีที่แล้ว

      Burke Flight IIA and Burke Flight III have the new AN/SPY-6 radar. Those are definitely better than the Type 346 radar used on Chinese Type 055. Even the older AN/SPY-1D is a bit better. Type 346B radar is comparable to UK's Type 45 SAMPSON and S1850M radar in terms of detection range. While Burke only has 96 VLS cells, the missiles that they carry are dual/triple purpose. Take for example Tomahawk can target both land and sea targets at long range. Type 055 has separate missiles for that. CJ-10 for long range land attack, YJ-18 for short range anti-ship, and YJ-21 for long range anti-ship. There is also SM-6 for both ballistic and air defense, but can also target land and sea at short range. Type 55's HHH-9 is only for air defense.

    • @seoul_louis9584
      @seoul_louis9584 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is the reason why china is one the most hated countries in the world. They are so nationalistic and don't know their place. Are you serious? China doesn't even have good technology. They are all copycats or stolen technologies

    • @MrRuoxi
      @MrRuoxi ปีที่แล้ว +22

      ​@@seoul_louis9584 you should better talk to your politicans, I see no reason they should worry about China if it is as you said.
      On one side guys like you say China is nothing but just a crap country, on the other side, you say China is the top one threat of U.S. in political, tech and economy. Do you feel the logical problem here?

  • @abdurrahmanahmadashshiddiq6231
    @abdurrahmanahmadashshiddiq6231 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice thumbnail

  • @michaeldobson107
    @michaeldobson107 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Zuumwalt: "...there are only 3 of them made." Yep. And that's gonna be it, too. lol.

    • @rayjames6096
      @rayjames6096 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      None of the other destroyers on the list were produced in more than four except for the Arleigh Burke class and they're all far less advanced as the Zumwalt.

  • @MrDilemmash
    @MrDilemmash 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Love this video 📹 ❤

    • @NeilHarris-gf4ew
      @NeilHarris-gf4ew หลายเดือนก่อน

      Type 45 all the way gb rules

  • @user-gm1gb8nu8e
    @user-gm1gb8nu8e 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    세종대왕 ㅎㄷㄷ
    깜놀했네요

    • @user-jq1rz1ep3m
      @user-jq1rz1ep3m 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      일본의 최신은 마야급이죠
      세종대왕 함은
      실제는 아타고 에게도 많이 밀립니다
      성능 대충 적으려니 글이 너무 길거 같아 패스
      진짜 군사 무기에 투자 좀 더 했으면 좋겠네요

  • @Naz_i206
    @Naz_i206 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Maya class destroyer(an improved Atago) should be in the list

  • @elbanoleon1037
    @elbanoleon1037 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good

  • @user-lt6ke9hg8f
    @user-lt6ke9hg8f 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Our 055 is used in fisheries. . There should be no place for him on this list.

    • @muksindika8806
      @muksindika8806 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/iMZf_BYCk9U/w-d-xo.html

  • @gregbarry5875
    @gregbarry5875 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I am not sure the Zumwalt should even be on the list, and certainly not at #1. It was a total failure that was over budget by 200% and failed to meet its capabilities.

    • @louiez7179
      @louiez7179 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@anujpandita3387By 'more powerful' ,did u mean those two expensive and useless 155mm cannon?

    • @yili3339
      @yili3339 ปีที่แล้ว

      agree.

    • @Star832
      @Star832 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well said Greg

    • @hb1338
      @hb1338 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@anujpandita3387 In war it is not useful because it can't do anything worthwhile.

    • @fatdoi003
      @fatdoi003 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@louiez7179 don't know why they don't convert them to shoot Excalibur rounds instead

  • @Mundo-bn2ho
    @Mundo-bn2ho 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    n.1 looks more like a Modern Art museum than a boat

  • @victormartin6608
    @victormartin6608 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good video !!!

  • @thediciple40channel11
    @thediciple40channel11 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Feel like the Zuumwalt and Arleigh Burke should trade places considering that all the complications that came with the 3 Zuumwalts made the Navy stop its production and resume production of more Arleigh Burkes

    • @user-os2hl3fe5i
      @user-os2hl3fe5i ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Talking about the comprehensive combat effectiveness is that China's 055 destroyer is the most powerful! No matter radar or stealth system, as well as the complete set of weapons! The Arleigh Burke class destroyers are all products of 40 years ago! 055 is a product after 2015. Your ranking itself is fair!! Obviously, there are double standards in the United States from the country to the people!! Where can there be notarization?? It's like taking a bag of washing powder to hit a country!

    • @bieke780
      @bieke780 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The Zumwalt class is a failed experiment, not combat-effective at all .The Arleigh Burke class is 40 years old and its performance is outdated!King Sejong class cannot be invisible in front of radar,So the strongest battleship is the 055 type!

    • @j.m.youngquist419
      @j.m.youngquist419 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought they only had two of the zumwalt class

    • @definitelyfrank9341
      @definitelyfrank9341 ปีที่แล้ว

      Zumwalt lacks a long range volume search radar.

  • @user-zf4yu3pb9e
    @user-zf4yu3pb9e 2 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    加尔各答不排第一我不服。055小破渔船连个晾衣架都没有就不要上榜了,看看人家伯克和失踪大王先进的雷达波晾衣架多高大威猛。猪母应该跟歼星舰比,毕竟有高贵的需要工匠不断打磨的综合电力系统和天国的电磁炮。

  • @user-ph6nu8kq9y
    @user-ph6nu8kq9y ปีที่แล้ว +1

    줌 월트 정말 대단하고 멋있다.

  • @henrybancroft9039
    @henrybancroft9039 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Missed the Hobart class

  • @zeezee968
    @zeezee968 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    The Zumwalt may be the most technologically advance ship in the list but it definitely not the most powerful.

    • @timothychung4811
      @timothychung4811 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It has been a disaster for them so far.

    • @fatdoi003
      @fatdoi003 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1/2 of its radar is missing.... they're just blank panels lol

    • @mysygisun3335
      @mysygisun3335 ปีที่แล้ว

      使い方ではありませんか、ただズムワルトは駆逐艦とするより、
      使い方=強襲揚陸艦支援艦の立場から、フリゲイト・軽巡洋艦としたほうが正しいのでは。

    • @dayanwarna5270
      @dayanwarna5270 ปีที่แล้ว

      and the guns...

    • @spencer7404
      @spencer7404 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, it's not.

  • @addedcheese
    @addedcheese 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I'm sure the US navy will eventually make something of the Zumwalt but as of now I highly doubt it is the most powerful destroyer afloat given the huge amount of problems with the ships

    • @user-ss7qs4ps1i
      @user-ss7qs4ps1i 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The largest problem being technological immaturity, they fitted to much untested new technologies into it causing price overflow, unexpected systematic issues etc

    • @addedcheese
      @addedcheese 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@user-ss7qs4ps1i somehow that sounds like a lot of military projects around the world. Great in theory but execution causes problems

    • @paulchung9921
      @paulchung9921 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All in all, the firepower of the Zumwalt places it as a top tier, but its survival ability is dismal and nothing like WWII destroyers.

    • @addedcheese
      @addedcheese ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@paulchung9921 just what... The zumwalts primary weapon is unusable. As it stands it it just a glorified missile boat with really good stealth.
      What is that comment about WW2 ships?? Modern warfare is completely different so ofc the tools employed are completely different. A modern ship doesn't need to be able to take a hit as in general not getting hit in the first place is far more effective

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 ปีที่แล้ว

      Zumwalt is more like a submarine than a destroyer. Stealthy like a submarine, and carries long range missile like a submarine. Anyway, it's being repurposed and its gun will be replaced by the Navy's new CPS (Conventional Prompt Strike) hypersonic missile, which is their version of Army's LRHW (Long Range Hypersonic Weapon) that is operational since October last year.

  • @leiabbiepercia4666
    @leiabbiepercia4666 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I thought the Arleigh Burke Class Destroyers are top 3 and Type 055 is top 2.

  • @user-es8ho7wu7n
    @user-es8ho7wu7n 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    اولین کامنت

  • @user-uu6rg4hz7d
    @user-uu6rg4hz7d 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Horizon class mirip frigate bergsmini class

    • @muksindika8806
      @muksindika8806 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/iMZf_BYCk9U/w-d-xo.html

  • @ba-ub7fb
    @ba-ub7fb ปีที่แล้ว +17

    谦虚了,世宗大王级应该宇宙第一才对😋

    • @yuejiang4601
      @yuejiang4601 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      哈哈哈哈哈

    • @brck888
      @brck888 ปีที่แล้ว

      儿子排爹前面那是僭越啊,就跟日本不敢提谁炸他一样

    • @huichang2425
      @huichang2425 ปีที่แล้ว

      排第二,现在有正祖大王了,可能将来出现先祖大王就得排第三了。

    • @AK19782
      @AK19782 ปีที่แล้ว

      哥们,是失踪大王级😅😅😅

  • @alexandersa1166
    @alexandersa1166 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    where can I find the music from the video?

  • @user-yd2ix5kb5q
    @user-yd2ix5kb5q 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    يارب مصر تحصل عليها قريبا

    • @muksindika8806
      @muksindika8806 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/iMZf_BYCk9U/w-d-xo.html

  • @aryaputram
    @aryaputram 2 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    Vishakhapatnam and kolkata Class🔥🔥🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @shaddinmalik6364
      @shaddinmalik6364 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Lol

    • @aryaputram
      @aryaputram 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@shaddinmalik6364 what lol Pakistani 🤣

    • @aryaputram
      @aryaputram 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@shaddinmalik6364 just beg china for everything even for making baby 🤣🤣😂
      We are independent to make our necessities 🔥🇮🇳
      जय हिंद

    • @shaddinmalik6364
      @shaddinmalik6364 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aryaputram I'm not pakistani I'm russian

    • @aryaputram
      @aryaputram 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@shaddinmalik6364 🤣🤣shut up liar 🤣

  • @user-ee9wp1jc9s
    @user-ee9wp1jc9s ปีที่แล้ว +3

    형님들 정조대왕함으로 세대교체 되었습니다 ...

  • @Absolut531kmh
    @Absolut531kmh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thta edited 055 in the thumbnail tho XD

  • @ayanasan61
    @ayanasan61 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you understand the deficiencies?
    About korean SPY-1.

  • @roadking1062
    @roadking1062 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    old school squid, anything over 10k is a damn cruiser

  • @robertnemeth6248
    @robertnemeth6248 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There were 6 Type 45 destroyers produced not 4...

  • @jasondong9721
    @jasondong9721 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Shouldn’t the Zumwalt be last why? Why? No ammo it’s only used for sight seeing

    • @kazzi5874
      @kazzi5874 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@anujpandita3387🤣

    • @michaeldobson107
      @michaeldobson107 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Definitely take a shot at it then. lol.

    • @shawnhe6180
      @shawnhe6180 ปีที่แล้ว

      早就成为弃儿的朱姆沃尔特排第一,世宗大王何德何能能排在055和阿利伯克前面?好吧。后面那些垃圾战舰比如顶个球的45都在內,居然没有世界上拥有数量前二的052D,好吧,不愧为充满了意识形态的排名

    • @michaeldobson107
      @michaeldobson107 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shawnhe6180 Thanks, Shawn. Wish I could understand what any of those characters mean.

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 ปีที่แล้ว

      Zumwalt should not be in the list anyway as it's more like a submarine than a destroyer. Stealthy like a submarine, and carries long range missile like a submarine. Anyway, it's being repurposed and its gun will be replaced by the Navy's new CPS (Conventional Prompt Strike) hypersonic missile, which is their version of Army's LRHW (Long Range Hypersonic Weapon) that is operational since October last year.

  • @nopants3560
    @nopants3560 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Type 45 at 9 hahaha ! Number 1 . It can monitor 2000 targets the size of a ball travelling Mach 3

    • @ENGBriseB
      @ENGBriseB ปีที่แล้ว

      Plus it has the only Ballistic missiles defense and destroy system in Europe. And UKs Dragonfire Laser weapon system.

  • @dpzzkr7880
    @dpzzkr7880 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    颜值排名:1、Zumwalt 2、type055 其他的都是上个时代的

    • @user-dq6yk5fd8c
      @user-dq6yk5fd8c 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      加尔各答和055排名挨着,笑到了

    • @dddddh1
      @dddddh1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      zhumuwoerte有点太科幻了,但并不好看

    • @vettellewis7768
      @vettellewis7768 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      综合实力最强的明显是055,不清楚作者以什么排名排的,朱姆沃特更像是一艘先进技术集合试验舰并没有形成有效战力

    • @chloey3492
      @chloey3492 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@vettellewis7768 人家也知道055很牛逼但是就是不敢排到前面

    • @user-pp2xj1jl4r
      @user-pp2xj1jl4r ปีที่แล้ว +1

      那个已经提前退休了,有什么资格和055比

  • @lenthokchom
    @lenthokchom ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lol the type 055 destroyer deserve the top spot. The only destroyer with a hypersonic missile in service.

  • @user-ng1fv1vz9v
    @user-ng1fv1vz9v ปีที่แล้ว +4

    저 순위에 있는 구축함을 누가 조종하느냐에따라 순위가 또 달라질수있다~~

  • @felix25ize
    @felix25ize 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    How can you compare the Zumwalt who is in fact a cruiser with her 16000 tons and 155 mm cannon, vs 7000 tons destroyers with much more little armament ?

    • @user-ug4yr8er9g
      @user-ug4yr8er9g 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Лутьший исминец это тип 055 , зумвалд отдыхает.

    • @michaeldobson107
      @michaeldobson107 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because she is classified as a Zumwalt-class destroyer, not a Zumwalt-class cruiser, regardless of what you think? In naval terminology, a destroyer is a fast, maneuverable, long-endurance warship intended to escort larger vessels in a fleet, convoy or battle group and defend them against powerful short range attackers. There is nothing said anywhere about displacement or armament.

    • @fatdoi003
      @fatdoi003 ปีที่แล้ว

      Japan classified its light carrier as helicopter destroyer flying F35B lol

    • @easonovo
      @easonovo ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@fatdoi003lol笑死了

  • @shaunphillips1970
    @shaunphillips1970 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    4????? Type 45 Built was 6...D 32 Daring / D 33 Dauntless/D 34 Diamond / D 35 Dragon / D 36 Defender / D 37 Duncan

  • @Seenit_73
    @Seenit_73 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Playing World of warships does not make you a Naval Engineer...

  • @blairshi2045
    @blairshi2045 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ype 055 is a fishing boat😀

  • @user-fc5tu4nd1v
    @user-fc5tu4nd1v 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    055是渔船不是军舰

  • @pis4578
    @pis4578 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    자랑스러운 우리대한민국 🇰🇷 세종대왕함

    • @user-hj9ez6jc5z
      @user-hj9ez6jc5z 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The problem is people who can't master it.

    • @Teemo-_-
      @Teemo-_- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@user-hj9ez6jc5z Have you lost your thinking function due to exposure to Fukushima radiation?

    • @user-en8dm6po7c
      @user-en8dm6po7c 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is a culture of putting a toilet in the kitchen in this country

    • @theshoutingt573
      @theshoutingt573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      소한민국 사람 미친 사람 같다. 도량이 작아서, 비겁해서, 무엇도 작아서

    • @user-by2wg3si3d
      @user-by2wg3si3d 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      失踪大王

  • @ronniefarnsworth6465
    @ronniefarnsworth6465 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Future USN Burke Flight lll (building), case closed !!
    Until the New USN DDX is designed !!!

  • @rafalef42
    @rafalef42 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Where is japanese Maya class??..it is superior to Atagos

  • @-philippe7647
    @-philippe7647 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    没有台湾的0.06万吨巨舰塔江舰?差评!熊三在手,天下我有!

    • @shawnhe6180
      @shawnhe6180 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      哥们,你别逗我了,这船进水了

  • @gekikara_48
    @gekikara_48 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    KIROV-CLASS BATTLECRUISER with Hyper Sonic Zircon? Did you forget it?

    • @grzegorzstyrna26
      @grzegorzstyrna26 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is it destroyer or battlecruiser?

    • @gekikara_48
      @gekikara_48 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      in the description, can be as a destroyer

    • @ser43_OLDC
      @ser43_OLDC 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That is a battlecruiser, but yes the Goroskov class is name frigate but is clearly a destroyer

    • @oldcynical2845
      @oldcynical2845 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice missiles but is a poor asw & air defense platform.

    • @ser43_OLDC
      @ser43_OLDC 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@oldcynical2845 Excuse me what? Poor air defense? I didn't know that having a400 was a poor Ground to Air defense

  • @ViacheslavJashin
    @ViacheslavJashin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Что то Эсминцы потяжелели ,и больше похожи на лёгкие крейсера!!!

  • @Malaga19
    @Malaga19 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Destroyer f💯 💥🇪🇸🇪🇦

  • @wongkcmichael5
    @wongkcmichael5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    It is a laughingstock. A 1991 US built destroyer is better than a China one made in 2019????

    • @PoorPakistanisSurrenderwasFant
      @PoorPakistanisSurrenderwasFant 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Chynes 😂
      Today a Chynes made J-10 Crashed 😂

    • @user-bu6rz9by2r
      @user-bu6rz9by2r 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@PoorPakistanisSurrenderwasFant A Indian M2000 crashed . Loser make fake news 😂

    • @yuxuanliu6973
      @yuxuanliu6973 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@user-bu6rz9by2r 兄弟。确实有一架歼十双座坠毁了。不过和三哥比坠毁。太没追求了吧

    • @TSUTENKAKU007
      @TSUTENKAKU007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I could be wrong, but perhaps what he is thinking and comparing is based on the overall quality of internal features. As we all know by now that China rather prefers to manufacture inferior or should I say, poor quality products, anything from chop sticks to more sophisticated products. They may look very impressive from the outside, but what counts the most is how well the inside is made, reliability factor as well and overall quality of what U.S. has been making in many past years with quality in mind. Just imagine many of Chinese fighters are reverse engineered Russian products with poor performing engines. So this is what I think what this presentation is talking about, based on overall quality despite U.S. destroyers were originally designed around 1991. Also don't forget all of U.S. destroyers have went through many upgrades with much improved weapon systems to the highest standards of today's navy, so these destroyers will not be fighting with 1991 antiquated equipments. The presentation should have mentioned this factors.

  • @Mn12074
    @Mn12074 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The thumbnail 😂😂😂

  • @Bennycn
    @Bennycn ปีที่แล้ว +1

    嗯嗯,你说的都对。

  • @bingbinghan6186
    @bingbinghan6186 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    朱姆沃尔特就算了,世宗大王和阿利伯克级能比055好?还有,那些速度不是最大速度,二是最大巡航速度,不是一个概念

  • @aestradarespeto
    @aestradarespeto 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Curious, there are destroyers in this list that weights no more than 500 tons over spanish F-100 class and are clearly less powerfull, mainly due to the lack of a system like AEGIS, but spanish ones are named frigates when serving in Spain Nay and destroyers when in australian Navy.

    • @ThatsMrPencilneck2U
      @ThatsMrPencilneck2U 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Frigate is a weird word that means different kinds of ships depending on what era and what navy. In the US Navy, it didn't describe a ship smaller than a destroy until the 1970's. What Spain and Australia call a "frigate" could be entirely different, even if the Australians speak something that resembles English. Otherwise, "frigate" used to mean a ship of the line, which was anything short of a dreadnought.

    • @juanalvarez5550
      @juanalvarez5550 ปีที่แล้ว

      No solamente ocurre con las fragatas, sino con cosas más sencillas como la paella: ¡vas a Australia y le llaman "paella" cualquier cosa, aunque no lleve arroz!
      PS: saludos a los australianos, buena gente.

    • @dayanwarna5270
      @dayanwarna5270 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ThatsMrPencilneck2U Yes the terminology has changed.
      In the 1980s Frigate was used to describe a ship under 3k and destroyer more than 3 (roughly speaking)
      Now the next generation RN frigates displace more than a WW2 arathusa class light cruiser!
      I do think Frigate by the british and Australian Navy means a primary ASW role with secondary AA and AS roles, and destroyer is a AA primary role with a support function of ASW/ASM.
      The T 45 and the Hobart class destroyers have a heavy AA role with the T45 going for a significant weapons boost shortly.
      The T26 for Australia and the UK will have a massive AA role but will be primarly tasked with ASW for fleet support.

  • @tigerpjm
    @tigerpjm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Zumwalt Class.
    You don't know what you're talking about...

    • @alpearson9158
      @alpearson9158 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      actually the Brit is correct

    • @muksindika8806
      @muksindika8806 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      th-cam.com/video/iMZf_BYCk9U/w-d-xo.html

  • @user-vr8wl3re2k
    @user-vr8wl3re2k 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Isn't the Type 055 technically a Cruiser?

  • @karimbenzamin2996
    @karimbenzamin2996 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    america: we have the most powerful navy russia: hold my vodka

    • @menlay2k
      @menlay2k 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Russia doesn't have navy wtf, 0 air craft carriers.

  • @xroadcedarhill9224
    @xroadcedarhill9224 2 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    South Korean 3 of KD-3 batch 2 is comming, it's even bigger and stronger than 3 of preceding ships. Its displacement is more than 12,000 tons, it will arm SM2ER, L-SAM, 1500 to 3000Km LACM, Super & hyper sonic ASM, Red shark and probably short or medium range ballistic missile.
    It's gonna be launched in 2024.

    • @xroadcedarhill9224
      @xroadcedarhill9224 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @silva neymar Nope, HHI started a construction of the first ship from last October 5th. ROKN rescheduled its construction to have the KD3 ships early and 6 of KDDX ships are postponed few years due to the plan

    • @user-to4pf9bk1j
      @user-to4pf9bk1j 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@xroadcedarhill9224 Any way, Korea is strong

    • @user-xp4ft4pg6c
      @user-xp4ft4pg6c 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Your strength comes from the United States

    • @seoul_louis9584
      @seoul_louis9584 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@user-xp4ft4pg6c Lol its not

    • @musician5378
      @musician5378 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm Korean. From 2023 is correct.

  • @GGANBU85
    @GGANBU85 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    미제 1위... 졸라 단단해보이네

  • @Trac1992
    @Trac1992 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Arleigh Burke have length is 154 meters

  • @lightfootpathfinder8218
    @lightfootpathfinder8218 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    There are 6 type 45 destroyers in the Royal navy not 4

  • @ridoyukil17
    @ridoyukil17 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    American destroyer no.1. So funny

    • @shawnhe6180
      @shawnhe6180 ปีที่แล้ว

      导弹都发射不了居然排导弹驱逐舰的第一位,funny writer

  • @danielqi7716
    @danielqi7716 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    055 is just a small fishing boat and cannot enter the Top 10😎

  • @thomaszhang3101
    @thomaszhang3101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    I have no idea how Renhai 055 didn’t rank higher than King Seijong or at least Arleigh Burke.
    In terms of size, displacement, sensors, communications, and VLS, the 055 is clearly better.
    Sensor - first and only dual band radar, communication - designed and equipped as fleet command ship, VLS - largest diameter out of any VLS and the only VLS using concentric ring vents instead of the older rectangular vents on every other destroyers.

    • @canda8350
      @canda8350 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      055 class is not Aegis combat system.

    • @user-hs9xf2me4w
      @user-hs9xf2me4w 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@canda8350 한국 스틱

    • @russelfang7434
      @russelfang7434 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@canda8350 King Sejong can kill a star destroyer in a single shot.

    • @user-hf4do1zm9i
      @user-hf4do1zm9i ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@babycyndi3235 是的,055是一艘渔船,过段时间就把鱼送到你家😂

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 ปีที่แล้ว

      Burke Flight IIA and Burke Flight III have the new AN/SPY-6 radar. Those are definitely better than the Type 346 radar used on Chinese Type 055. Even the older AN/SPY-1D is a bit better. Type 346B radar is comparable to UK's Type 45 SAMPSON and S1850M radar in terms of detection range. While Burke only has 96 VLS cells, the missiles that they carry are dual/triple purpose. Take for example Tomahawk can target both land and sea targets at long range. Type 055 has separate missiles for that. CJ-10 for long range land attack, YJ-18 for short range anti-ship, and YJ-21 for long range anti-ship. There is also SM-6 for both ballistic and air defense, but can also target land and sea at short range. Type 55's HHH-9 is only for air defense. Also stealth is useless for ships. Even the Zumwalt's RCS can only go as a small fishing boat. Plus even if ships are as stealthy like 5th gen planes, it's useless anyway as Tomahawks is also an anti-radiation missile and can track enemy ships' radar emissions.

  • @willhu3601
    @willhu3601 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Can the hybrid boat in India rank fifth? All of India’s weapons depend on foreign support. When the war begins, they will all become shit.

    • @muksindika8806
      @muksindika8806 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      th-cam.com/video/iMZf_BYCk9U/w-d-xo.html

    • @THE_VARUN_EDITZEE
      @THE_VARUN_EDITZEE 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why Chinese People are Always Living in Balck 😂😂
      Foreigners Suport 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
      Came in War Then Understand 😁

    • @simplespecial3313
      @simplespecial3313 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Kolkata class is indian made .....i feel Agni 5 will land in Beijing if you think this ! ....

    • @willhu3601
      @willhu3601 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@simplespecial3313 The power system of the Kolkata-class destroyer comes from Ukraine, the radar comes from Israel, the anti-ship missile comes from Russia, the anti-aircraft missile and close-to-air gun come from Israel and Russia, the ship management system comes from Canada, the naval gun comes from Italy, and the helicopter comes from Russia , you just put them together, don't kid yourself ok?By the way, Agni 5 is also a piece of shit compared to DF 41

    • @simplespecial3313
      @simplespecial3313 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Okay something more ?????

  • @elvinsmatthew
    @elvinsmatthew 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    look up the hobart class

  • @MegaLouLuo
    @MegaLouLuo ปีที่แล้ว

    Seeing > arleigh burke ? Dream on boys.

  • @JMK1552
    @JMK1552 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    줌월트는 인정..나머지는 다 거기서 거기..

    • @BITCO1N
      @BITCO1N 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      줌왈트 그 비싸기만 더럽게 비싼 쓰레기를??

  • @ikko4107
    @ikko4107 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    私はあきづき型護衛艦が好きです

  • @miguelmig1771
    @miguelmig1771 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    .0 type 055 Chinese is number one, not those US junkyards

  • @seventian6117
    @seventian6117 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    India and Korea destroyer shall have top 2 spots, Zumwalt a distance 3.

    • @kazzi5874
      @kazzi5874 ปีที่แล้ว

      您的评论是基于实际情况。但我不希望美国人阅读这条评论。

    • @user-pz4un1wx9j
      @user-pz4un1wx9j ปีที่แล้ว +1

      韩国第一,印度第二,无可争议的!

    • @liangcongg
      @liangcongg ปีที่แล้ว

      你是懂驱逐舰的

    • @user-yx9bg3sz7r
      @user-yx9bg3sz7r 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-pz4un1wx9j你小子

  • @YaMomsOyster
    @YaMomsOyster 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Mate if you don’t include the missile load, and each type of missile and torpedoes I think you are just Fanboying !

    • @erbingchan209
      @erbingchan209 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is no doubt that the video maker of this person is not a military enthusiast at all.

  • @island8555
    @island8555 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    대함미사일10기를 막을수있는 구축함 있으면 1등이라해줄게....

  • @videom5055
    @videom5055 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    오호 세종대왕 급 쪈다.. 기대안했는데 2등