Why the Indigenous Status of Limbus Should Be RevokedThe question of indigenous status in Nepal is a contentious issue shaped by historical, cultural, and political factors. The Limbus, a community claiming indigenous status, lack substantial historical and archaeological evidence to support this designation. This essay argues that the indigenous status of Limbus should be reconsidered due to their migratory history from Sichuan to Tibet and later to Nepal, lack of historical artifacts, and manipulation of documents with colonial assistance.Historical and Archaeological VoidUnlike other indigenous groups in Nepal, such as the Lepcha, Bhutia, and Newar, who possess rich historical records, architectural landmarks, and cultural artifacts dating back centuries, the Limbus lack tangible evidence of ancient settlements, palaces, temples, or significant archaeological finds that would substantiate their claim as indigenous to the region. The absence of such evidence raises doubts about their historical ties to the land compared to other established indigenous communities.Migration PatternsHistorical records indicate that the Limbus migrated from Sichuan, China, to Tibet in the 13th century, and subsequently moved to Nepal in the late 16th century. These migrations, marked by geopolitical shifts and cultural exchanges, highlight their origins outside the current borders of Nepal. Unlike indigenous groups with deep-rooted ancestral ties to the region, the Limbus' migratory history suggests a more recent arrival, challenging their claim to indigenous status based on continuous presence and cultural continuity.Colonial Influence and Fabrication of DocumentsDuring the colonial era, particularly under British rule, the Limbus reportedly fabricated documents to bolster their indigenous claims. This manipulation, facilitated by colonial authorities, enabled them to assert a historical narrative and gain recognition as indigenous in certain administrative contexts. Such historical revisionism and document forgery undermine the integrity of their indigenous status claim, especially when compared to the rigorous criteria and historical authenticity required for indigenous recognition in other regions.Contemporary Status in SikkimIn neighboring Sikkim, the Limbus have lost their tribal status, indicating a recognition shift that reflects deeper scrutiny of their indigenous claims. This precedent underscores the inconsistencies and challenges associated with defining indigenous identity solely based on self-proclaimed historical narratives and manipulated documentation.
सम्वाद फिका लाग्याे प्रश्न सान्दर्भिक नहुनाले जान्न र सुन्न इच्छुकहरुले त्यतिउपलब्धी पूर्ण लागेन ।अरुणकुमार विद्वान हुनुहुन्छ उहाँलाई प्रष्ट पार्ने समय नदिएर अनावश्यक प्रश्न थाेपरियाे ।
Why the Indigenous Status of Limbus Should Be RevokedThe question of indigenous status in Nepal is a contentious issue shaped by historical, cultural, and political factors. The Limbus, a community claiming indigenous status, lack substantial historical and archaeological evidence to support this designation. This essay argues that the indigenous status of Limbus should be reconsidered due to their migratory history from Sichuan to Tibet and later to Nepal, lack of historical artifacts, and manipulation of documents with colonial assistance.Historical and Archaeological VoidUnlike other indigenous groups in Nepal, such as the Lepcha, Bhutia, and Newar, who possess rich historical records, architectural landmarks, and cultural artifacts dating back centuries, the Limbus lack tangible evidence of ancient settlements, palaces, temples, or significant archaeological finds that would substantiate their claim as indigenous to the region. The absence of such evidence raises doubts about their historical ties to the land compared to other established indigenous communities.Migration PatternsHistorical records indicate that the Limbus migrated from Sichuan, China, to Tibet in the 13th century, and subsequently moved to Nepal in the late 16th century. These migrations, marked by geopolitical shifts and cultural exchanges, highlight their origins outside the current borders of Nepal. Unlike indigenous groups with deep-rooted ancestral ties to the region, the Limbus' migratory history suggests a more recent arrival, challenging their claim to indigenous status based on continuous presence and cultural continuity.Colonial Influence and Fabrication of DocumentsDuring the colonial era, particularly under British rule, the Limbus reportedly fabricated documents to bolster their indigenous claims. This manipulation, facilitated by colonial authorities, enabled them to assert a historical narrative and gain recognition as indigenous in certain administrative contexts. Such historical revisionism and document forgery undermine the integrity of their indigenous status claim, especially when compared to the rigorous criteria and historical authenticity required for indigenous recognition in other regions.Contemporary Status in SikkimIn neighboring Sikkim, the Limbus have lost their tribal status, indicating a recognition shift that reflects deeper scrutiny of their indigenous claims. This precedent underscores the inconsistencies and challenges associated with defining indigenous identity solely based on self-proclaimed historical narratives and manipulated documentation.
सही ईतिहास खोज्ने र लेख्ने प्रयास गरिनु पर्छ। त्यो गौरवशाली पनि हुन पनि सक्छ नहुन पनि, जेठो पनि हुन सक्छ कान्छो पनि। मूल कुरा ज्ञान र सत्यको खोजमूलक जानकारी हो । नकी घोक्रे नाक र फुलेको छाती। आग्रहपूर्ण ब्याख्या गर्दै मख्ख परेर, अरूलाई सत्तो सराप गरेर, अर्को पक्षको इतिहास मेटेर इतिहास को पुनर्उत्थान हुदैन।
मनुवादी हिन्दु ब्राह्मण समुदायका विद्वान हरुले आफ्नो समुदाय, आफ्नो धर्मका र आफ्नो ख्यातिको बारेमा बढाई चढाई इतिहास भन्ने र लेख्ने! तर, अन्यको समुदाय, अन्य धर्म र अन्यको ख्यातिमा ईर्ष्या पुर्वक दबाएरै भन्ने र लेख्ने गरेको पाईन्छ है सर!
Why the Indigenous Status of Limbus Should Be RevokedThe question of indigenous status in Nepal is a contentious issue shaped by historical, cultural, and political factors. The Limbus, a community claiming indigenous status, lack substantial historical and archaeological evidence to support this designation. This essay argues that the indigenous status of Limbus should be reconsidered due to their migratory history from Sichuan to Tibet and later to Nepal, lack of historical artifacts, and manipulation of documents with colonial assistance.Historical and Archaeological VoidUnlike other indigenous groups in Nepal, such as the Lepcha, Bhutia, and Newar, who possess rich historical records, architectural landmarks, and cultural artifacts dating back centuries, the Limbus lack tangible evidence of ancient settlements, palaces, temples, or significant archaeological finds that would substantiate their claim as indigenous to the region. The absence of such evidence raises doubts about their historical ties to the land compared to other established indigenous communities.Migration PatternsHistorical records indicate that the Limbus migrated from Sichuan, China, to Tibet in the 13th century, and subsequently moved to Nepal in the late 16th century. These migrations, marked by geopolitical shifts and cultural exchanges, highlight their origins outside the current borders of Nepal. Unlike indigenous groups with deep-rooted ancestral ties to the region, the Limbus' migratory history suggests a more recent arrival, challenging their claim to indigenous status based on continuous presence and cultural continuity.Colonial Influence and Fabrication of DocumentsDuring the colonial era, particularly under British rule, the Limbus reportedly fabricated documents to bolster their indigenous claims. This manipulation, facilitated by colonial authorities, enabled them to assert a historical narrative and gain recognition as indigenous in certain administrative contexts. Such historical revisionism and document forgery undermine the integrity of their indigenous status claim, especially when compared to the rigorous criteria and historical authenticity required for indigenous recognition in other regions.Contemporary Status in SikkimIn neighboring Sikkim, the Limbus have lost their tribal status, indicating a recognition shift that reflects deeper scrutiny of their indigenous claims. This precedent underscores the inconsistencies and challenges associated with defining indigenous identity solely based on self-proclaimed historical narratives and manipulated documentation.
Why the Indigenous Status of Limbus Should Be RevokedThe question of indigenous status in Nepal is a contentious issue shaped by historical, cultural, and political factors. The Limbus, a community claiming indigenous status, lack substantial historical and archaeological evidence to support this designation. This essay argues that the indigenous status of Limbus should be reconsidered due to their migratory history from Sichuan to Tibet and later to Nepal, lack of historical artifacts, and manipulation of documents with colonial assistance.Historical and Archaeological VoidUnlike other indigenous groups in Nepal, such as the Lepcha, Bhutia, and Newar, who possess rich historical records, architectural landmarks, and cultural artifacts dating back centuries, the Limbus lack tangible evidence of ancient settlements, palaces, temples, or significant archaeological finds that would substantiate their claim as indigenous to the region. The absence of such evidence raises doubts about their historical ties to the land compared to other established indigenous communities.Migration PatternsHistorical records indicate that the Limbus migrated from Sichuan, China, to Tibet in the 13th century, and subsequently moved to Nepal in the late 16th century. These migrations, marked by geopolitical shifts and cultural exchanges, highlight their origins outside the current borders of Nepal. Unlike indigenous groups with deep-rooted ancestral ties to the region, the Limbus' migratory history suggests a more recent arrival, challenging their claim to indigenous status based on continuous presence and cultural continuity.Colonial Influence and Fabrication of DocumentsDuring the colonial era, particularly under British rule, the Limbus reportedly fabricated documents to bolster their indigenous claims. This manipulation, facilitated by colonial authorities, enabled them to assert a historical narrative and gain recognition as indigenous in certain administrative contexts. Such historical revisionism and document forgery undermine the integrity of their indigenous status claim, especially when compared to the rigorous criteria and historical authenticity required for indigenous recognition in other regions.Contemporary Status in SikkimIn neighboring Sikkim, the Limbus have lost their tribal status, indicating a recognition shift that reflects deeper scrutiny of their indigenous claims. This precedent underscores the inconsistencies and challenges associated with defining indigenous identity solely based on self-proclaimed historical narratives and manipulated documentation.
आजसम्म रामायण ३१४ किसिमका मानीसहरुले ३१४ तरिकाले लेखेका छन्। कुनचाहिँ लाई सहि हो भन्नू हो हजुर? Dino- Sour (भयानक छोपारो) विनाश भएको ६६ मिलियन बर्ष भयो भन्छन् वैज्ञानिक हरु। यो ६६ मिलीयन बर्ष भनेको लगभग ७ पटक पृथ्वी विनाश भएर सातै पटक पुनर्निर्माण भईसक्ने समय हो, तर, डायनासौर को gangrene हरु हिजआज २/३ जग्गा मा archeologists ले भेटिरहेका छन्। ६६ मिलियन बर्षमा त ६ चोटि चट्टान भई सक्नु पर्ने हो त, फेरि gangrene भेटिन्छन्। साँचो ईतिहास ले मानीसलाई स्वर्ग प्रवेश गर्न पुर्ण मदद गर्दछ ! तर, ईन्द्रजाल जस्तो ईतिहास को पछि लाग्नु र पानीमा पाध्नु एउटै हो जस्तो लाग्दछ मालाई त हजुर। यो केवल जातीय अहमता को कारण मात्र हो। जस्तै बाहुन काका हरुले हामी ब्रह्मको मुख बाट जन्मेका हुनाले, हामी मात्र मानव हौ, अरु सवै क्षेत्री, वैश, क्षुद्रहरु लाई तुच्छ हुन् भनेझैं। अनि त्यसै गरि राई र हब्सी हरु आफै आफै अहमतामा स गर्व गर्दछन्। म पनि राई हुँ त भन्दछु तर perfaction थाहा छैन। मात्रै म माटोको भाडो हुँ र भोलि धुलोमा अवस्य फर्की जानेछु भन्ने चाहिँ रामरी जान्दछु। यसैले म आफ्नो लागि भन्दा अकाशका असख्या ताराहरु का हितको लागि मात्रै तन मन र धनले म ब्यस्त रहन खोज्दछु। To revive the pre-history of this universe is greater difficult than to count the sand in the Ocean. Therefore, to study the magnitude arts of Divine Father is edequately enough for the peace and prosperity among human kinds to bring. In the sky there are SUN, MOON representatives of Eternal Parents and celestial bodies: planets, metuers etc. Dear Sirs, Let us gather togather our mindhands to build a ONE NEPALI foremostly, and than ONE HUMAN BEINGS, gradually. This is only the Prime Task executed on us primordially! inconvenience caused is much regretted! Thanks!!!
Bahun le sacho itihas kadapi batauna chahadaina kina ki sacho bolyo bhane eniharuko mahabharat kal ramayan hindu dharma brahman kapati bare dhoti kholinx bahun ko pol khulx .
Sabai dharma guruharu bijay shahi jastai hun. Jesus Mohammad buddha hindu guru Sabai. Ajako dinma janmeko bhaye sabaiko dhoti khusinthiyo . andhakar yugma Janata yestako pachi lage ra ajasamma itihas ra Sanskriti ko naamma continue bhairako cha. Bhagwanle manisko hoina manisle bhagwan ko concept sristi gareko prasta cha. Buddhism ma punarjanmabata chutkara paunu main lakshya nirvana bhaniyeko cha. Tara punarjanma bhanekai hundaina baby janmauda amabauko dna next generation ma transfer huncha. Yeti bujhe dherai unnecessarily lafada bata chutkara payincha
बडो ताजुव छ! शुन्य "0" को आविस्कार भएको लगभग १४०० बर्ष भयो भनेर तथ्य (ईतिहाँस) पढन पाईन्छ, फेरि श्रृष्टी को उमेर १ अरब ९६ करोड कसरी र कस्ले लेखेता हजुर?
Tamuji subedit sala bahun taile kun adhar ma boldaixa ta itihas bud hi ? Mahabir ra Buddha ko janma 10 15 barsa matra farak xa mahabir le gyan prapta gareko ra buddhale gyan prapta gareko Pani 10 barsa matra farak xa ta muji lai k tha muji krisen KO gu chaterabidwan baneka ke Buddha KO bare yestai bolxa samrat Ashoka KO xori charumati ra Ashoka KO xora Mahindra Nepal ma dharma prachar garna ayeka thiye bujauNepal ma Buddha dharma yo Shakya muni Buddha vandanu pahile ni nepal ma Buddha dharma mantle Tesco praman baneko swoyemvu Nath ho bujeu
Great initiation...
इतिहास-धर्म-संस्कृति विरुद्ध Marxist/leftist को बेतुकी कथन र तर्कप्रती गरिएको यो प्रयास सार्थक रहोस् 🙏
Thank you 🙏 keep watching us.
Why the Indigenous Status of Limbus Should Be RevokedThe question of indigenous status in Nepal is a contentious issue shaped by historical, cultural, and political factors. The Limbus, a community claiming indigenous status, lack substantial historical and archaeological evidence to support this designation. This essay argues that the indigenous status of Limbus should be reconsidered due to their migratory history from Sichuan to Tibet and later to Nepal, lack of historical artifacts, and manipulation of documents with colonial assistance.Historical and Archaeological VoidUnlike other indigenous groups in Nepal, such as the Lepcha, Bhutia, and Newar, who possess rich historical records, architectural landmarks, and cultural artifacts dating back centuries, the Limbus lack tangible evidence of ancient settlements, palaces, temples, or significant archaeological finds that would substantiate their claim as indigenous to the region. The absence of such evidence raises doubts about their historical ties to the land compared to other established indigenous communities.Migration PatternsHistorical records indicate that the Limbus migrated from Sichuan, China, to Tibet in the 13th century, and subsequently moved to Nepal in the late 16th century. These migrations, marked by geopolitical shifts and cultural exchanges, highlight their origins outside the current borders of Nepal. Unlike indigenous groups with deep-rooted ancestral ties to the region, the Limbus' migratory history suggests a more recent arrival, challenging their claim to indigenous status based on continuous presence and cultural continuity.Colonial Influence and Fabrication of DocumentsDuring the colonial era, particularly under British rule, the Limbus reportedly fabricated documents to bolster their indigenous claims. This manipulation, facilitated by colonial authorities, enabled them to assert a historical narrative and gain recognition as indigenous in certain administrative contexts. Such historical revisionism and document forgery undermine the integrity of their indigenous status claim, especially when compared to the rigorous criteria and historical authenticity required for indigenous recognition in other regions.Contemporary Status in SikkimIn neighboring Sikkim, the Limbus have lost their tribal status, indicating a recognition shift that reflects deeper scrutiny of their indigenous claims. This precedent underscores the inconsistencies and challenges associated with defining indigenous identity solely based on self-proclaimed historical narratives and manipulated documentation.
सम्वाद फिका लाग्याे प्रश्न सान्दर्भिक नहुनाले जान्न र सुन्न इच्छुकहरुले त्यतिउपलब्धी पूर्ण लागेन ।अरुणकुमार विद्वान हुनुहुन्छ उहाँलाई प्रष्ट पार्ने समय नदिएर अनावश्यक प्रश्न थाेपरियाे ।
शुभकामना छ मित्र राम्रो सुरुवातको लागि।
Thank you Sir.
नेपालको पुनर्जागरणको संवाहक निर्मलमणि अधिकारी हो। उहाँलाई बोलाउन पर्छ।
Why the Indigenous Status of Limbus Should Be RevokedThe question of indigenous status in Nepal is a contentious issue shaped by historical, cultural, and political factors. The Limbus, a community claiming indigenous status, lack substantial historical and archaeological evidence to support this designation. This essay argues that the indigenous status of Limbus should be reconsidered due to their migratory history from Sichuan to Tibet and later to Nepal, lack of historical artifacts, and manipulation of documents with colonial assistance.Historical and Archaeological VoidUnlike other indigenous groups in Nepal, such as the Lepcha, Bhutia, and Newar, who possess rich historical records, architectural landmarks, and cultural artifacts dating back centuries, the Limbus lack tangible evidence of ancient settlements, palaces, temples, or significant archaeological finds that would substantiate their claim as indigenous to the region. The absence of such evidence raises doubts about their historical ties to the land compared to other established indigenous communities.Migration PatternsHistorical records indicate that the Limbus migrated from Sichuan, China, to Tibet in the 13th century, and subsequently moved to Nepal in the late 16th century. These migrations, marked by geopolitical shifts and cultural exchanges, highlight their origins outside the current borders of Nepal. Unlike indigenous groups with deep-rooted ancestral ties to the region, the Limbus' migratory history suggests a more recent arrival, challenging their claim to indigenous status based on continuous presence and cultural continuity.Colonial Influence and Fabrication of DocumentsDuring the colonial era, particularly under British rule, the Limbus reportedly fabricated documents to bolster their indigenous claims. This manipulation, facilitated by colonial authorities, enabled them to assert a historical narrative and gain recognition as indigenous in certain administrative contexts. Such historical revisionism and document forgery undermine the integrity of their indigenous status claim, especially when compared to the rigorous criteria and historical authenticity required for indigenous recognition in other regions.Contemporary Status in SikkimIn neighboring Sikkim, the Limbus have lost their tribal status, indicating a recognition shift that reflects deeper scrutiny of their indigenous claims. This precedent underscores the inconsistencies and challenges associated with defining indigenous identity solely based on self-proclaimed historical narratives and manipulated documentation.
❤❤❤❤🙏🙏🙏🙏
सही ईतिहास खोज्ने र लेख्ने प्रयास गरिनु पर्छ। त्यो गौरवशाली पनि हुन पनि सक्छ नहुन पनि, जेठो पनि हुन सक्छ कान्छो पनि।
मूल कुरा ज्ञान र सत्यको खोजमूलक जानकारी हो । नकी घोक्रे नाक र फुलेको छाती। आग्रहपूर्ण ब्याख्या गर्दै मख्ख परेर, अरूलाई सत्तो सराप गरेर, अर्को पक्षको इतिहास मेटेर इतिहास को पुनर्उत्थान हुदैन।
Thank you so much. Much needed.
Basanta bidhari jheyo lai volauno pareuo ❤❤
मनुवादी हिन्दु ब्राह्मण समुदायका विद्वान हरुले आफ्नो समुदाय, आफ्नो धर्मका र आफ्नो ख्यातिको बारेमा बढाई चढाई इतिहास भन्ने र लेख्ने!
तर, अन्यको समुदाय, अन्य धर्म र अन्यको ख्यातिमा ईर्ष्या पुर्वक दबाएरै भन्ने र लेख्ने गरेको पाईन्छ है सर!
Go ahead ❤️
अरुण कुमार ले मनगन्ते कुरा गर्छ यो पनि यक नम्बर को दलाल फटाहा हो हाहा
Why the Indigenous Status of Limbus Should Be RevokedThe question of indigenous status in Nepal is a contentious issue shaped by historical, cultural, and political factors. The Limbus, a community claiming indigenous status, lack substantial historical and archaeological evidence to support this designation. This essay argues that the indigenous status of Limbus should be reconsidered due to their migratory history from Sichuan to Tibet and later to Nepal, lack of historical artifacts, and manipulation of documents with colonial assistance.Historical and Archaeological VoidUnlike other indigenous groups in Nepal, such as the Lepcha, Bhutia, and Newar, who possess rich historical records, architectural landmarks, and cultural artifacts dating back centuries, the Limbus lack tangible evidence of ancient settlements, palaces, temples, or significant archaeological finds that would substantiate their claim as indigenous to the region. The absence of such evidence raises doubts about their historical ties to the land compared to other established indigenous communities.Migration PatternsHistorical records indicate that the Limbus migrated from Sichuan, China, to Tibet in the 13th century, and subsequently moved to Nepal in the late 16th century. These migrations, marked by geopolitical shifts and cultural exchanges, highlight their origins outside the current borders of Nepal. Unlike indigenous groups with deep-rooted ancestral ties to the region, the Limbus' migratory history suggests a more recent arrival, challenging their claim to indigenous status based on continuous presence and cultural continuity.Colonial Influence and Fabrication of DocumentsDuring the colonial era, particularly under British rule, the Limbus reportedly fabricated documents to bolster their indigenous claims. This manipulation, facilitated by colonial authorities, enabled them to assert a historical narrative and gain recognition as indigenous in certain administrative contexts. Such historical revisionism and document forgery undermine the integrity of their indigenous status claim, especially when compared to the rigorous criteria and historical authenticity required for indigenous recognition in other regions.Contemporary Status in SikkimIn neighboring Sikkim, the Limbus have lost their tribal status, indicating a recognition shift that reflects deeper scrutiny of their indigenous claims. This precedent underscores the inconsistencies and challenges associated with defining indigenous identity solely based on self-proclaimed historical narratives and manipulated documentation.
सत्य शास्त्र अनुसार तथ्य बिज्ञानले प्रमाणीत गरेको विषय हुनुपर्छ होला नि।
Arunjiko sabai kura ramro tara ghasiram marbbadiko xora kailash sirohiyako sandarbhama bolda ali bibek napugeko dekheko xu
🕉️🕉️🕉️🙏🙏🙏
Thanks for watching
Why the Indigenous Status of Limbus Should Be RevokedThe question of indigenous status in Nepal is a contentious issue shaped by historical, cultural, and political factors. The Limbus, a community claiming indigenous status, lack substantial historical and archaeological evidence to support this designation. This essay argues that the indigenous status of Limbus should be reconsidered due to their migratory history from Sichuan to Tibet and later to Nepal, lack of historical artifacts, and manipulation of documents with colonial assistance.Historical and Archaeological VoidUnlike other indigenous groups in Nepal, such as the Lepcha, Bhutia, and Newar, who possess rich historical records, architectural landmarks, and cultural artifacts dating back centuries, the Limbus lack tangible evidence of ancient settlements, palaces, temples, or significant archaeological finds that would substantiate their claim as indigenous to the region. The absence of such evidence raises doubts about their historical ties to the land compared to other established indigenous communities.Migration PatternsHistorical records indicate that the Limbus migrated from Sichuan, China, to Tibet in the 13th century, and subsequently moved to Nepal in the late 16th century. These migrations, marked by geopolitical shifts and cultural exchanges, highlight their origins outside the current borders of Nepal. Unlike indigenous groups with deep-rooted ancestral ties to the region, the Limbus' migratory history suggests a more recent arrival, challenging their claim to indigenous status based on continuous presence and cultural continuity.Colonial Influence and Fabrication of DocumentsDuring the colonial era, particularly under British rule, the Limbus reportedly fabricated documents to bolster their indigenous claims. This manipulation, facilitated by colonial authorities, enabled them to assert a historical narrative and gain recognition as indigenous in certain administrative contexts. Such historical revisionism and document forgery undermine the integrity of their indigenous status claim, especially when compared to the rigorous criteria and historical authenticity required for indigenous recognition in other regions.Contemporary Status in SikkimIn neighboring Sikkim, the Limbus have lost their tribal status, indicating a recognition shift that reflects deeper scrutiny of their indigenous claims. This precedent underscores the inconsistencies and challenges associated with defining indigenous identity solely based on self-proclaimed historical narratives and manipulated documentation.
नेपाल को चाहि बासतबिक ईतिहास र थम केहो
आजसम्म रामायण ३१४ किसिमका मानीसहरुले ३१४ तरिकाले लेखेका छन्। कुनचाहिँ लाई सहि हो भन्नू हो हजुर?
Dino- Sour (भयानक छोपारो) विनाश भएको ६६ मिलियन बर्ष भयो भन्छन् वैज्ञानिक हरु। यो ६६ मिलीयन बर्ष भनेको लगभग ७ पटक पृथ्वी विनाश भएर सातै पटक पुनर्निर्माण भईसक्ने समय हो, तर, डायनासौर को gangrene हरु हिजआज २/३ जग्गा मा archeologists ले भेटिरहेका छन्।
६६ मिलियन बर्षमा त ६ चोटि चट्टान भई सक्नु पर्ने हो त, फेरि gangrene भेटिन्छन्।
साँचो ईतिहास ले मानीसलाई स्वर्ग प्रवेश गर्न पुर्ण मदद गर्दछ !
तर, ईन्द्रजाल जस्तो ईतिहास को पछि लाग्नु र पानीमा पाध्नु एउटै हो जस्तो लाग्दछ मालाई त हजुर।
यो केवल जातीय अहमता को कारण मात्र हो।
जस्तै बाहुन काका हरुले हामी ब्रह्मको मुख बाट जन्मेका हुनाले, हामी मात्र मानव हौ, अरु सवै क्षेत्री, वैश, क्षुद्रहरु लाई तुच्छ हुन् भनेझैं।
अनि त्यसै गरि राई र हब्सी हरु आफै आफै अहमतामा स गर्व गर्दछन्।
म पनि राई हुँ त भन्दछु तर perfaction थाहा छैन। मात्रै म माटोको भाडो हुँ र भोलि धुलोमा अवस्य फर्की जानेछु भन्ने चाहिँ रामरी जान्दछु।
यसैले म आफ्नो लागि भन्दा अकाशका असख्या ताराहरु का हितको लागि मात्रै तन मन र धनले म ब्यस्त रहन खोज्दछु।
To revive the pre-history of this universe is greater difficult than to count the sand in the Ocean.
Therefore, to study the magnitude arts of Divine Father is edequately enough for the peace and prosperity among human kinds to bring.
In the sky there are SUN, MOON representatives of Eternal Parents and celestial bodies: planets, metuers etc.
Dear Sirs,
Let us gather togather our mindhands to build a ONE NEPALI foremostly, and than ONE HUMAN BEINGS, gradually.
This is only the Prime Task executed on us primordially!
inconvenience caused is much regretted!
Thanks!!!
Sanhi do dai
So extremely right ho
Bahun le sacho itihas kadapi batauna chahadaina kina ki sacho bolyo bhane eniharuko mahabharat kal ramayan hindu dharma brahman kapati bare dhoti kholinx bahun ko pol khulx .
Aafno bigyata bhanda bahirako kura garda ali suhaudaina..
सीलालेख लाई लिपपोत गरेर मीटाऊने काम बम बादिले मिटाई दियपछी कसरिथाहा पाऊने
Sabai dharma guruharu bijay shahi jastai hun. Jesus Mohammad buddha hindu guru Sabai. Ajako dinma janmeko bhaye sabaiko dhoti khusinthiyo . andhakar yugma Janata yestako pachi lage ra ajasamma itihas ra Sanskriti ko naamma continue bhairako cha. Bhagwanle manisko hoina manisle bhagwan ko concept sristi gareko prasta cha. Buddhism ma punarjanmabata chutkara paunu main lakshya nirvana bhaniyeko cha. Tara punarjanma bhanekai hundaina baby janmauda amabauko dna next generation ma transfer huncha. Yeti bujhe dherai unnecessarily lafada bata chutkara payincha
Buddha ani Ashok ko samaya kaal think xa tara chanakya ko utto na Patto. Xa ta kewal Katha ma!!!!!
Fiction ho chanakya
Bed kunai purano Grantham hoina saskrti KO utpati 12 satabdi ma vayeko ho yo Chor Hindu harule pali vasa batai chorera Sanskrit banayeka hun
His story her story theirs story my story 😂😂
बडो ताजुव छ! शुन्य "0" को आविस्कार भएको लगभग १४०० बर्ष भयो भनेर तथ्य (ईतिहाँस) पढन पाईन्छ, फेरि श्रृष्टी को उमेर १ अरब ९६ करोड कसरी र कस्ले लेखेता हजुर?
Lumbini sthit ashok stambha bare ullekh bhayana.
योमान्छेले नेपाललाइ केयोगदान दिएको छ?
What you have done yourself ?
के मा योगदान चाहियो भ्रष्ट ठग राजनीति कर्मीको।
म आफ्नो कार्य क्षेत्रमा सधै कर्मठ छु,
Taluma alu phaleko manchhe ho
Tamuji subedit sala bahun taile kun adhar ma boldaixa ta itihas bud hi ? Mahabir ra Buddha ko janma 10 15 barsa matra farak xa mahabir le gyan prapta gareko ra buddhale gyan prapta gareko Pani 10 barsa matra farak xa ta muji lai k tha muji krisen KO gu chaterabidwan baneka ke Buddha KO bare yestai bolxa samrat Ashoka KO xori charumati ra Ashoka KO xora Mahindra Nepal ma dharma prachar garna ayeka thiye bujauNepal ma Buddha dharma yo Shakya muni Buddha vandanu pahile ni nepal ma Buddha dharma mantle Tesco praman baneko swoyemvu Nath ho bujeu
Hawa hawa ho
Only you know everything?
Hawa KuRa jasto 🔱