Based on this talk, and before reading Jijith’s book, I thought the location of Lanka being in the vicinity of the Narmada river, as proposed by the author, would be appropriate based on the Kartavirya Arjuna and Ravana encounter in the Narmada river. But after reading the book, my analysis shows that the conclusion of the location of the Lanka doesn’t appear to be correct. The following Ramayana references are from Gita press English translation. 1-Sri Rama wanted to go away from Chitrakuta region, and to deep into the Dandakaranya, because the memory of seeing Bharatha at Chitrakuta haunts him (Ayodhya Kanda, Canto 117). 2-On that path, Sri Rama crosses many rivers of deep waters. (Aranya kanda, Canto 7, sloka 2) Based on the above two references, one would assume that the Chitrakuta and Panchavati are separated by a long distance. But from his research, author places the Panchavati in the vicinity of the Chitrakuta mountain (Geography of Ramayana, Page 249). Based on this initial conclusion, author traces the path of Sri Rama and Laxmana and derives the location of the Lanka to an island at the mouth of the Narmada river. Sage Valmiki compares the bridge, after its completion, with the parting of the woman hair (Yudha kanda, Canto 23, Slokas 77-81). Dark ocean on both sides probably looked like woman’s hair and the bridge as the skin on the center of the head. That in fact was a beautiful comparison. Same bridge was described as the MilkyWay in the sky (sloka 74). These comparisons of the bridge wouldn’t be justifiable to a bridge in the Narmada river. Moreover, constructing a bottom up bridge over a flowing river is not possible. Because of these reasons, I still believe the city of Lanka being somewhere in the island of Sri Lanka.
Thanks God now scientists are into verifying our heritage. Good initiative sir. Bravo! Baat nikli hai to door talak jayegi aur Ye naye bharat ki shuruat hogi.
You will get more in net ramanisblog.in/2014/03/05/ramayana-scientific-dating-wrong/#:~:text=The%20radiocarbon%20dating%20of%20the,the%20mythical%20%27Treta%20Yuga%27.&text=Rama%27s%20Birth%20Date%3A,for%2014%20years%20of%20exile.
@Prasant Kumar, When will the scientist give evidence 1) The late Ram and Krishna were the avatars of Vishnu. 2) Hanuman, a flying monkey with a flaming tail existence. 3) Ganapathi, a composite MURDA 3) 100 Kauravas being the sons of Dhritarashtra and Gandhari, biologically FALSE and ABSURD. 4) Bhagwat Gita contains the verbal discourse Krishna claims to give to Arjun at the Mahabharath war 5561 BCE. 5) Krishna was present during the Mahabharath war of 5561 BCE when Krishna was believed to be born to Vasudev and Davki in 3228 BCE. Satyemeva Jayete.
Ravana is not a normal human being to have difficulty in seeing things and needing glasses or telescope to see across the ocean from the Palace of Ravana located in Sigiriya in the middle of Sri Lanka! One who can build a palace on top of a mountain like Sigiriya, should have a telescope, even if didn't have ten heads!
dear sangam talk how that you are presenting talks by Shri Nilesh Oak and Mr Ravi .Both have diagramatic opposite views about Geography of Ramayan.Such talks leave all viewers very much confused.Shri Aditya Satsangi has also opined on this
@drprashantbhatnagar6056; Dr. Sahib, How would it matter, Ramayan and Mahabharath are mythologies; Bhagwat Gita claims to contain the verbal discourse Krishna gave to Arjun at the Mahabharath War, 5561 BCE, when Krishna was born in 3228BCE, ~ 2333 Years after the Mahabharath war 5561 BCE. Ram's friend Hanuman, a flying monkey with a flaming tail never existed. Hinduism, a hypocritical belief, claiming to follow the noble doctrine of Ahinsha parmo dharma while glorifying through worship of Kalpanic KATILS like Ram, Krishna, and Shiva, who beheaded his son and like a fool, MURKH replaced it with a large and heavy head of a slaughtered elephant, crushing the beheaded lifeless MURDA, Ganapathi lying on the ground, worshiped for good luck and removing life obstacles, instead of removing the Ganapathi, a composite MURDA for cremation. Worship a loving and jivit Parmeshwar. Satyemeva Jayete.
@@prosantomukerji3931 How do you know Krishna was born in 3228 BCE ? Any proof ? What is your evidence that Vaanaras never existed ? Mr. TMC watch your words when you speak on any topic revered by millions.
@@nirmalchandrabiswas6403 yes and i also believe Rama , ravana etc are not real people but anthropomorphized metaphorical astronomical references alike.
@@TropicOfCancer1998 for modern astronomers gods and angels are mere scribblings in paper Stories are found everywhere around you....its just where it meets your eye
Ramayan is pronounced as Ramayana, Vanar is pronounced as Vanara, Ram becomes Rama shows the Macaulay's influence on your education. Creating confusion and controversy through your pedantic talk. Shame on you.
In the original Sanskrit, it is not Ram but Rama.This phenomenon of "Schwa deletion" happened due to influence of Persian and has taken place the maximum in North Indian languages. The schwa is not deleted in Sanskrit and is retained in all Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and Malayalam as well as Odia. So you have it the other way around.
Namaskara, I want to talk to you about a particular topic in Ramayana. Please give your contact no. Dr.Jayanthi Manohar, Vedic research scholar, Bengaluru
![ไข้ขึ้นเลย! เมื่อแฝดโดนจัดเต็มวัคซีนครบ2เดือน🤒 [cc] แดนแพทตี้ SS2 | EP.54 |](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/z2VHItnyyvY/mqdefault.jpg)
Based on this talk, and before reading Jijith’s book, I thought the location of Lanka being in the vicinity of the Narmada river, as proposed by the author, would be appropriate based on the Kartavirya Arjuna and Ravana encounter in the Narmada river. But after reading the book, my analysis shows that the conclusion of the location of the Lanka doesn’t appear to be correct. The following Ramayana references are from Gita press English translation.
1-Sri Rama wanted to go away from Chitrakuta region, and to deep into the Dandakaranya, because the memory of seeing Bharatha at Chitrakuta haunts him (Ayodhya Kanda, Canto 117).
2-On that path, Sri Rama crosses many rivers of deep waters. (Aranya kanda, Canto 7, sloka 2)
Based on the above two references, one would assume that the Chitrakuta and Panchavati are separated by a long distance. But from his research, author places the Panchavati in the vicinity of the Chitrakuta mountain (Geography of Ramayana, Page 249). Based on this initial conclusion, author traces the path of Sri Rama and Laxmana and derives the location of the Lanka to an island at the mouth of the Narmada river.
Sage Valmiki compares the bridge, after its completion, with the parting of the woman hair (Yudha kanda, Canto 23, Slokas 77-81). Dark ocean on both sides probably looked like woman’s hair and the bridge as the skin on the center of the head. That in fact was a beautiful comparison. Same bridge was described as the MilkyWay in the sky (sloka 74). These comparisons of the bridge wouldn’t be justifiable to a bridge in the Narmada river. Moreover, constructing a bottom up bridge over a flowing river is not possible. Because of these reasons, I still believe the city of Lanka being somewhere in the island of Sri Lanka.
Gita Press is not a Critical Edition of Valmiki Ramayana!
Thanks God now scientists are into verifying our heritage. Good initiative sir. Bravo! Baat nikli hai to door talak jayegi aur Ye naye bharat ki shuruat hogi.
You will get more in net
ramanisblog.in/2014/03/05/ramayana-scientific-dating-wrong/#:~:text=The%20radiocarbon%20dating%20of%20the,the%20mythical%20%27Treta%20Yuga%27.&text=Rama%27s%20Birth%20Date%3A,for%2014%20years%20of%20exile.
@Prasant Kumar, When will the scientist give evidence 1) The late Ram and Krishna were the avatars of Vishnu. 2) Hanuman, a flying monkey with a flaming tail existence. 3) Ganapathi, a composite MURDA 3) 100 Kauravas being the sons of Dhritarashtra and Gandhari, biologically FALSE and ABSURD. 4) Bhagwat Gita contains the verbal discourse Krishna claims to give to Arjun at the Mahabharath war 5561 BCE. 5) Krishna was present during the Mahabharath war of 5561 BCE when Krishna was believed to be born to Vasudev and Davki in 3228 BCE. Satyemeva Jayete.
@@prosantomukerji3931These are all false notions
@@prosantomukerji3931टेस्ट ट्यूब बेबी सुने है
क्रिपटो / बॉट😂
Completely misleading information. How do you say something is later addition. How did you fix dates for these events. Please provide valid evidences
Where is the Dr. Sudha Seshayan's Kamba Ramayanam video?
Ravana is not a normal human being to have difficulty in seeing things and needing glasses or telescope to see across the ocean from the Palace of Ravana located in Sigiriya in the middle of Sri Lanka! One who can build a palace on top of a mountain like Sigiriya, should have a telescope, even if didn't have ten heads!
where is Harischandra in the Surya Vamsha of Ram's dynasty in this pic?
What is the basis of classifying Mandla
dear sangam talk
how that you are presenting talks by Shri Nilesh Oak and Mr Ravi .Both have diagramatic opposite views about Geography of Ramayan.Such talks leave all viewers very much confused.Shri Aditya Satsangi has also opined on this
@drprashantbhatnagar6056; Dr. Sahib, How would it matter, Ramayan and Mahabharath are mythologies; Bhagwat Gita claims to contain the verbal discourse Krishna gave to Arjun at the Mahabharath War, 5561 BCE, when Krishna was born in 3228BCE, ~ 2333 Years after the Mahabharath war 5561 BCE. Ram's friend Hanuman, a flying monkey with a flaming tail never existed. Hinduism, a hypocritical belief, claiming to follow the noble doctrine of Ahinsha parmo dharma while glorifying through worship of Kalpanic KATILS like Ram, Krishna, and Shiva, who beheaded his son and like a fool, MURKH replaced it with a large and heavy head of a slaughtered elephant, crushing the beheaded lifeless MURDA, Ganapathi lying on the ground, worshiped for good luck and removing life obstacles, instead of removing the Ganapathi, a composite MURDA for cremation. Worship a loving and jivit Parmeshwar. Satyemeva Jayete.
@@prosantomukerji3931 How do you know Krishna was born in 3228 BCE ? Any proof ? What is your evidence that Vaanaras never existed ? Mr. TMC watch your words when you speak on any topic revered by millions.
@@TheB657chutiya hai bhai chod usko...inki tadat kuch jyada hi bdh Rahi hai ajj kal.
Sounds good!
Nilesh oak on location of Lanka
You are higly mistook...about Srilanka...go to lanka
And....see..
Geography of Ramayan and Mahabharat?? I'm convinced this topic and title title is stolen from Nilesh Oak's works. ✌️ No hate.
in ancient times equator is considerd to be near ujjain mahakala temple.
@crazycosco5657; Stealing is a rich Indian tradition. HUM SAB CHORE HAI. Jai Hind
@@prosantomukerji3931 Tum apne family tredition ko country par maat daalo. 😅 Jai Hind.
❤
❤❤❤
इसके बारे में छोड़ो इसके बारे में सोचो 👇👇👇
Jai sri ram
Surya Siddhanta says Lanka is in equator!
This Lanka proposed by the ancient astronomers was a hypothetical city reference
@@nirmalchandrabiswas6403 yes and i also believe Rama , ravana etc are not real people but anthropomorphized metaphorical astronomical references alike.
@@TropicOfCancer1998 for modern astronomers gods and angels are mere scribblings in paper
Stories are found everywhere around you....its just where it meets your eye
in ancient times equator is considerd to be near ujjain mahakala temple.
@@RahulRaj-sn8rg that's not equator, that's the prime meridian
Sanatan Dharma ki Jai...
Ramayan is pronounced as Ramayana, Vanar is pronounced as Vanara, Ram becomes Rama shows the Macaulay's influence on your education. Creating confusion and controversy through your pedantic talk. Shame on you.
Why are you displaying your ignorance of Sanskrit? "Raam" is the Hindi pronunciation of Sanskrit word "Raama".
LOLS TRUE! 😒😒
@@sagarm4983in Sanskrit it's Rāma
In the original Sanskrit, it is not Ram but Rama.This phenomenon of "Schwa deletion" happened due to influence of Persian and has taken place the maximum in North Indian languages. The schwa is not deleted in Sanskrit and is retained in all Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and Malayalam as well as Odia. So you have it the other way around.
Namaskara, I want to talk to you about a particular topic in Ramayana. Please give your contact no. Dr.Jayanthi Manohar, Vedic research scholar, Bengaluru