So if you didn't have either one but are set on Lowrance, which one would you suggest. You can get AT1 right now from Bass Pro for $1000 or wait and pay $650 more for AT2? My question, of course, is it worth the extra $? Thanks
@InDepth Sonar looking forward to the video. Also, I'm not buying an hds pro. I have a hds live and don't care nothing about the multi views either. Just thought if the quality was better, I would get AT2. Thanks again for the videos.
Have to say from videos I have seen the stitching is gone and the photo you have provided is clearly not even close to each other. Let’s post facts not options
I have used AT2. However, it wasn’t ice fishing. This is a bad example IMO. Pretty disappointed in this comparison to be honest. AT2 is better. The stitching is still there but not as bad. The target separation is better and the returns are better.
![БОЖЕ, ЧТО ЭТО?! Active target от LOWRANCE. ELITE FS7. Review Active Target [ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНЫЙ ОБЗОР]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P_G5IDSW2LE/mqdefault.jpg)
Full Video here th-cam.com/video/CzMRcd7ZAhI/w-d-xo.html
Your range is set differently. That makes a huge difference. That’s like comparing apples to oranges.
I still like Active Target 1 👏👏❤️
No doubt that the stitching is still there. I have not seeing any reason to upgrade yet.
Active target 1 has some blue lines all the time - is it possible to remove these lines ?
So if you didn't have either one but are set on Lowrance, which one would you suggest. You can get AT1 right now from Bass Pro for $1000 or wait and pay $650 more for AT2? My question, of course, is it worth the extra $? Thanks
Honestly at this point I can't say it's worth going to AT2. I'm gonna try to have an AT1 vs AT2 comparison video posted this weekend
@InDepth Sonar looking forward to the video. Also, I'm not buying an hds pro. I have a hds live and don't care nothing about the multi views either. Just thought if the quality was better, I would get AT2. Thanks again for the videos.
Have to say from videos I have seen the stitching is gone and the photo you have provided is clearly not even close to each other. Let’s post facts not options
Have you used it yourself? I have and the stitching is not gone.
Aka go buy a garmin
At this point........ YES lol
Lowrance is better
I have used AT2. However, it wasn’t ice fishing. This is a bad example IMO. Pretty disappointed in this comparison to be honest.
AT2 is better. The stitching is still there but not as bad. The target separation is better and the returns are better.
It's better in some ways for sure... But when you are hoping for it to exceed Garmin it's disappointing
@@InDepthSonar have you had it anywhere other than i e fishing?
No, everywhere around me has at least a foot of ice on the lake. A couple of months before I'll try it in open water
I think it's even better to compare it on ice fishing. Not much difference on those videos and I would not use more money for at2
What tranducer I have to use
Deep sea until 200 meters
Is get the Garmin LiveScope XR if you want to try and hit that depth. I doubt it would even make it that deep
How many meters deep ??
This was about 20 feet deep. You'll have to Google to convert to that measurement you are asking about
so, lvs62 is the way to go