LS TURBO INTAKE MANIFOLD MYTH-DOES IT MATTER UNDER BOOST?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ก.ย. 2024
  • TURBO LS INTAKE TEST-TRUCK, LS1, LS6, TBSS, FAST & FAB-WHO WINS?
    THE QUESTION IS DOES RUNNER LENGTH OR INTAKE DESIGN ACTUALLY MATTER UNDER BOOST? I MEAN DOESN'T BOOST JUST TAKE CARE OF EVERYTHING? CHECK OUT THIS SERIES OF LS INTAKE MANIFOLD TESTS WHERE I COMPARED INTAKES ON 4.8L, 5.3L AND 6.0L APPLICATIONS, BOTH NA AND UNDER BOOST. DOES BOOST CHANGE WHAT THE INTAKE DESIGN DOES?

ความคิดเห็น • 293

  • @finacialfreedomfighters
    @finacialfreedomfighters 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    "I'm not doing this for the money," I think that deserves a HUGE like button smash.

  • @TheTmshuman
    @TheTmshuman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Richard, you are doing God’s work. Bless you dyno Jesus. You truly are the engine Messiah.

  • @detroitamerson8789
    @detroitamerson8789 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I wish the main stream media was as honest as you are Richard

  • @marcstlaurent3719
    @marcstlaurent3719 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I applaud your integrity, I’m sick of the other automotive channels praising the ear pods ( you guys know which ones ) that the people who specialize in electronics will tell you that not only are those ear buds poor performers but in their lower price range other brands perform better .

  • @danny_playswithcars
    @danny_playswithcars 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    These videos aren't even relevant to anything I've ever owned and I'm still fascinated every time. This guy is the man.

  • @fordhoarder
    @fordhoarder 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    So nice to see someone stick to their cause and not sell out. You are a modern day Robinhood Richard. Thank you for everything you do and telling it how it really is.

  • @jaceyrondeau8133
    @jaceyrondeau8133 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I was a magazine junky as a kid. So glad you started this channel. Appreciate all the variety of testing you do. Keep it coming. Thanks 👍

  • @jasonn4397
    @jasonn4397 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I can’t wait to see where this channel takes you in years time Rich. Thank you for being a stand up guy, and providing such detailed information.

  • @kyholm
    @kyholm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Richard's channel is the only subscription you even need on youtube

  • @MustangCrazyMan72
    @MustangCrazyMan72 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Never heard of max speedy, but I like your openess to try new things and appreciate it. You could easily name your show Dyno Myth Busters. 😂👍😁

    • @68Swiftshifter
      @68Swiftshifter 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      One of the MANY Ebaymotors/elsewhere online stores that sell the same parts/pieces. DNAMotoring, CX Racing, EMUSA, more. All good budget stuff.

  • @drakeolson2539
    @drakeolson2539 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love the test results! I bought the fast manifold because of this channel. I can tell you I wasn’t disappointed!!! Keep up the amazing work!

  • @danielsullivan9865
    @danielsullivan9865 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    We changed from a LS6 intake manifold to a short Runner Holley sniper and just ran our first 8 second at 165 miles an hour. Never been above 158 mile per hour previously. I think the short Runner works very well on high boost.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      boost level doesn't change what the intake does-you might be running higher engine speeds

    • @danielsullivan9865
      @danielsullivan9865 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@richardholdener1727 yes LS6 intake Peaks and flat lines at 6300 and the sniper keeps pushin on up with Boost and RPM. equals about 100 more horsepower at the top

    • @timothybayliss6680
      @timothybayliss6680 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think running 8s at 160s isn't what most people are doing with their stock engines. At the drags specifically, short runners work really well. You spend all of your time at wot and half your time within 1000rpm of shift point. You also spend more time in the lower gears because the power doesn't roll over as bad. For guys on the street, it's maybe not a great idea but at the strip it can really pay off.

    • @danielsullivan9865
      @danielsullivan9865 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@timothybayliss6680 thanks for the reply Tim it's a 3600 lb 67 Camaro 3 pedal fully synchronized T56 transmission power seats and power windows not exactly a race car. It's a TCI suspension pro touring car. if we wanted to butcher it put it on a large diet and a Powerglide go a whole lot faster

  • @lloydholt6511
    @lloydholt6511 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love your videos. Great educational experience and I love the debunk material. You always give enough information for us armatures to make a logical informed decision irregardless of the rpm range you want to run. For me it will almost always be an engine operating range under 5500-6000 rpm. Doesn’t mean I don’t appreciate the higher rpm stuff. Everyone’s operating conditions are correct for them. You’ve always been excellent in your presentations, always giving everyone the information they need in a clear concise manner that everyone understands. Thank you for always sharing your information with all.

  • @s2upid
    @s2upid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    A lot of VW owners use maxspeedingrods connecting rods and short runner intake manifolds in their budget builds. A friend and I built an engine with their rods and they were a better balanced set than the factory stuff. I think it was something like .5 grams on the rods. The stock pistons had a lot more deviation between cylinders.

  • @davidw.thatmsdguy8952
    @davidw.thatmsdguy8952 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You always keep it real and that is exactly why I love watching your channel. Well of course the massive amounts of information from testing you put out too!

  • @richardpenner4686
    @richardpenner4686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A man with ethics..I like it...keep up the good work....

  • @jimmiller4667
    @jimmiller4667 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Being unbiased is so rare these days. I'm sick of what's left of the magazine industry, all they do now is "we install a xyz part and wow is it great" there is no more "we put 351w heads on a 302 to make more power(for example). Or doing one ton axle swaps from the junkyard, it's always "we went to abc diff company and installed their diff, wow it's great)
    That said Richard, I can't stress how valuable what you're doing is. It may seem nothing to you, but you should be compensated somehow. I have young guys come in my shop and I'll school them on intakes, cams, whatever and they are blown away that I freely give out info. I never thought of it any more than "passing on the torch to the younger crowd" but several have said they want to pay me to diagnose, etc. I'm retired and am not interested in running a business, I love engines and just want to pass it on. You are on a whole other level though. Perhaps running some companies stuff(and getting paid to tell the truth) will lead to more companies which would then be "to see how well our products work, see Richards video of them in action."
    All these claims of hp etc...but what does Richard say?? That's the bar to go by, not what any manufacture say So!

  • @MRCtouring
    @MRCtouring 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It is impressive how well a stock manifold does and unless you are chasing big power it will be the perfect for non extreme HP or high rev engines.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      we've done more than 1300 hp with them-we know we could do more

  • @kennethpowers8995
    @kennethpowers8995 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ve tuned nearly a dozen various LS builds running positive manifold pressure and the FAST manifolds with no cracking or boost leaks. The only PVC style manifold I have seen bleed off boost was a FRPP piece on a 3v mod motor and this was an 950+ flywheel HP bracket car running a lot of boost pressure.

  • @erenzoscroggins8056
    @erenzoscroggins8056 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Richard your doing us big favors and you deserve way more sponsors dawg so take what you can baby and be about your word of what you told us,,, let's gooooo 💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻

  • @MRBoatwrights
    @MRBoatwrights 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I would like to see a 6.0 ls tested with boost with low rpm torque and heavy duty towing in mind. A gasoline powered answer to the duramax. The mantanice is cheaper and no def fluid or emmison issues.

    • @Sdukes001
      @Sdukes001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just delete it I think towing application on a gasser might run into heating issues or just burning alot of fuel to tow.

    • @bill2178
      @bill2178 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      gale banks lays out the dynamics of gas versus diesel a gas engine will make 20% more torque with the same cubic inchThe only reason diesels make torque is because they have small turbos that boost off idle 6.0 with a hx40 at 7 lbs would be perfect it would just choke at 4k

    • @danielsullivan9865
      @danielsullivan9865 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think that would be very easy to accomplish but you would need some good rods and pistons and a couple of T3 T4 China hybrids instant spool

    • @MRBoatwrights
      @MRBoatwrights 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@danielsullivan9865 I was thinking good rods, some type of good forged piston, head studs and good gaskets. Drill the main bearing oil gallery for piston cooling jets. The biggest oil pan you can fit in the chassis, high capacity engine oil cooler. Work out the turbo arrangement for quick spool and maximum torque up to about 4500 it does not matter past that point. I would want to be able to set the throttle at 4000 and pull a long grade without having to worry about it melting down. The over all hp number does not matter torque is what gets the work done. Building this type of engine requires an entirely different mind set from building a high HP race engine.

    • @MRBoatwrights
      @MRBoatwrights 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Sdukes001 I worked as a Paramedic from 04 to 16 we had a whole fleet of 4500 cutaway modular ambulances with a GVW of 13500lbs. The company bought duramax/allison chassis until 2010 then switched over to 6.0 gas/6L85 chassis due to emissions and having to have def. They didn't want the chance of failure or going into limp mode on an emergency call. The gas engines got 8.5 mpg the diesels about 11.5. The gas chassis was $10000 less at purchase and the mantanice cost was less over the life of the truck. The fleet manager told me the gas trucks where cheaper to operate even with significantly less mpg. The truck where replaced between 275000 and 300000 miles the gas trucks ran just as long and where still in excellent condition when they where replaced. I was never broken down on the side of the road or had one run hot. There was times at a car wreck or other major event one would sit on the side of the road in 100° heat with the AC wide open and the emergency lights on with the high idle at 1600rpm and the temp hand never move off normal. This experience sold me on late model gm gas engines.

  • @markreibson7030
    @markreibson7030 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks Richard.
    Integrity for the win.
    you are still the same honest and trustworthy guy since the Silver State days. The magazines you used to write for seem to be losing sight of the values and ethics held by people like you . at least we can still trust Mr. Brulé.

  • @450promaui2
    @450promaui2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Richard you are such an awesome dude. Thank you for doing all this research. I really appreciate all you do for us. Keep them combos coming. Continuing to build on my 5.3 lm7 hp97 from ATK performance. Truly inspiring content. Thank you

  • @willemveenstra2084
    @willemveenstra2084 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Max speeding rods in my experience are ok rods, they will take some extra torque but they are china made. I found that the big ends we're not perfectly round and had some big clearance differences (not always). They do come with genuine arp hardware and are pretty well balanced.

  • @huddleberryfin
    @huddleberryfin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great job! Good on you in regards to the sponsorships. If a little earpod branding helps the channel I don’t seem to mind. But absolutely stand up job in regards to automotive parts and not being persuaded In that regard. Maxspeed is pretty big in the import world I believe. People in the Datsun community are beginning to use some of their parts. Rumours of some bad CQ, but overall I hear good things.

  • @scotthansen2240
    @scotthansen2240 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yes MaxSpeeding makes interesting stuff. Honda guys are big into them, I bought a couple GT3582s from them and they seem to be great!

  • @kristiangronberg3150
    @kristiangronberg3150 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You doing a great work, thanks for the great content 👍
    It just crossed my mind, that the runners length is tuned based on neny factors, the speed off sound is one of those, speed of sound is effected by temperature. So if my theory is right, the power curve switch higher in the rpms if you don't run a intercooler, yeah its much lower because density but where it makes those peak numbers should in theory be just a thatch higher 🤔

  • @apollorobb
    @apollorobb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ive used Max speeding Rods before and some other parts over the years they seem to be pretty solid parts . I dont have any complaints and the price is pretty nice also .

  • @stavinemigh9485
    @stavinemigh9485 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It’d be interesting to see the new BTR equalizer 1 intake manifold within the short runner manifold shoot out.

  • @MrBlackbutang
    @MrBlackbutang 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Of course the intake manifold matters . The the gn guys know about the last two cylinders at the rear going lean under boost. Kenne bell and a company from Utah I think made dog house and air diverting device to help cure this. Happens to ford 5.0 the reason downs ford made a bread box upper. Thanks Richard for all your hard work.

  • @jeffschwartz5199
    @jeffschwartz5199 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I appreciate your honesty 😌

  • @ricjona1069
    @ricjona1069 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My opinion is, if cost is an issue, boost first and then deal with the other add-ons. Get the biggest bang for your buck...boost...turbocharge or nitrous. Supercharger would not fall into the biggest bang category. The manifold is one of the quickest things to upgrade and can easily done later while you enjoy the fruits of boost until then.

  • @timothybayliss6680
    @timothybayliss6680 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I would like to see MaxSpeeding stuff tested. Some of it looks like offshore trash but their really good stuff looks like high end race stuff from ten years ago at half the price. Looks lots lots of there stuff is for other brands. Get a 2.0l VW EA and big bang...theyre pretty tough little engines
    Edit...if you do have a sponsorship with them try two hy35w on a 4.8l v two chinesium gt3582. Everyone always wants to know how holset fans work on a v8.

  • @mcwbadass
    @mcwbadass 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Richard, just like the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, your channel works because of how and what you do, don't ever change and I'll keep watching and ringing that bell my brother.

  • @bgee461
    @bgee461 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    +subscriber!! Been watching for a bit, but just the fact you want to test stuff and document what really happens makes me want to come along for the journey. Love the variety of content too, various gen small blocks, big blocks, poncho, olds and Buick, Honda, Blue oval ... Wanna see it all!!! 👍👍

  • @bill2178
    @bill2178 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    My theory is whatever gives you the best mid range to spool a bigger turbo will get you more efficiency then trying to run a smaller turbo so you can light it

  • @drivinwithdrew7676
    @drivinwithdrew7676 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I just put a fast 92 on my ls swapped bmw’s 370, and it doesn’t disappoint

  • @JustAnotherOldMan
    @JustAnotherOldMan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Aaannnnnd that’s why we watch and listen to you !
    Thank you Sir :)

  • @ze_german2921
    @ze_german2921 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m glad the Fast doesn’t really start making more power than the TBSS until 5500rpm since I have a truck and a $1000 intake would benefit me anyway.

  • @jppickeringful
    @jppickeringful 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have ordered alot of turbo stuff. On a budget. Most parts had 6k street miles with no failures.

  • @hayden6056
    @hayden6056 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rods aren't bad and machine up quite well. -+1 gram from the factory and the balancing pads a decent size. Occasionally need to resize big end.
    There turbo is what I ran that was so out of balance the wheel contacted housing and spade bits of blade through my intake.

  • @richardcoleman9645
    @richardcoleman9645 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now it would be nice if these componies would listen to you and us about how to make their products better. That would be a great compony. And lets keep the price down for everyone can use it.

  • @patlandymore7035
    @patlandymore7035 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Was the LS6 intake genuine GM or was it the Dorman replacement?
    Just curious as my understanding is the Dorman is 10-15 HP up on the original part.
    Great test, superb info as always!

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the Dorman LS6 made less than GM LS6 when I tested them back to back-the Dorman LS2 is better than both

    • @patlandymore7035
      @patlandymore7035 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for setting me straight.
      Very happy then that I purchased a 92mm Fast to go on my 2005 C6 Vette!

  • @joemomma12341
    @joemomma12341 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Related to MaxSpeedingRods, I have a set of their rods, and I have bought a couple exhaust flanges, turbo drains, and have seen a few sets of their suspension on Hondas, and typically their products seem to be typical of the current Ebay/Chinese based company that seems to be doing a lot of work off of production models they got second hand or modeled after, with alright quality control. Its nothing to write home about, but it is a company making parts available for reasonable prices for reasonably decent quality, but it is still a company that doesn't seem to be doing much developing, just selling copies of parts.

  • @brandoncharley3070
    @brandoncharley3070 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Max Speeding is near equivalent to DNA from what I've seen. I think Hoonigan and Mighty Car Mods have both used them on budget builds. They'd be a good fit for your channel.

  • @natricjol
    @natricjol 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    from all the tests you have done with the fast lsx (all versions) manifolds, you can see the replaceable runners create sine wave problems. some extensive maf tuning would have to be done to smooth everything out but those waves would create daily driver drivability issues.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      THEY JUST PRODUCE REFLECTED WAVES THAT MAKE POWER AT DIFFERENT RPMS-TUNING WOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE

    • @natricjol
      @natricjol 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richardholdener1727 I'm taking about those weird spots where the power level gets a little wonky

  • @kamrenwood1894
    @kamrenwood1894 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a maxspeedingrods gt45 turbo on my cammed 6L. I've been boosted since June 2020, and no problems as of yet. Started on 5lbs, now @ 11. Shaft still has the same amount of play as it did the day it arrived at my doorstep. Only complaint is he forgot to include the gaskets, and then wanted to argue with me about it. The turbo itself though, can't be beat for the price. $158 shipped to my door.

  • @manitoublack
    @manitoublack 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    As far as maxpeeding is concerned. they're almost 100% made in the same factory as 'Spool' and other off-shore forgings. jsut with a different lazer etching.
    not a bad product from word on the street, especially when updating mid 90's Japanese engines on a modest budget vs. forged in USA/Europe/Aus parts.

  • @DodgyBrothersEngineering
    @DodgyBrothersEngineering 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Richard yes the Fast manifold might produce the numbers... but what about the Edelbrock Cross Ram? That thing is the dogs bollocks (and it made pretty good numbers too).

  • @jerryhager9041
    @jerryhager9041 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You have the right plan for testing a new sponsor's equipment out on the dyno.Just make sure you get paid before you run it on the dyno.

  • @Sir.VicsMasher
    @Sir.VicsMasher 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    0:49 The 5.7L never gets love.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      its the same

    • @Sir.VicsMasher
      @Sir.VicsMasher 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richardholdener1727 I know, just saying that it doesn't even get acknowledged in your list of Cathedral port size engines at 0:49

  • @hossness5385
    @hossness5385 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a oil feed line turbo and a couple other things from them have not run them yet but going to in the future when I get around to doing my turbo kit!

  • @wiscopitbike
    @wiscopitbike 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Test the china maxspeedingrods. Im definitely interested in seeing how there quality is

  • @Misterfairweather
    @Misterfairweather 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'd love to see you test some Maxpeedingrods parts, they pop up all the time in online forums as a cheap option but the only parts I ever hear about are their coilovers.

  • @henryoddsball2164
    @henryoddsball2164 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Heck yeah, test whatever they’ll send! I’d love to see some of the offshore products tested. A lot of that stuff looks good and the price is appealing, but the quality of unknown

  • @oldschool6268
    @oldschool6268 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No LS motors need forged/ intake this or that ! The magazines are salesmen, I'm taking a 2005 LQ4 in my chevelle with gapping my rings and a nice 216/220 trick flow cam, LS9 head gasket, ARP head bolts, 2 S256 borg warner and dialing in 500 on low boost and turning it up a little for 600 hp ! All for about 4500 complete. I could do it for 1K less if it was a single set up !

  • @TheProchargedmopar
    @TheProchargedmopar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Oh man, Maxpeedingrods.
    I'd be very interested in products that work at those prices. 👍

  • @Shadow0fd3ath24
    @Shadow0fd3ath24 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fabricated ram style intakes HEMORRAGE power down low and dont make gains til 7200rpm even turboed. Ive see a china sheet metal intake, and a Holley high ram both drop 70hp and 50tq on a 5.7 down low and took til 7300+rpm to beat the Fast 92

  • @shaneintegra
    @shaneintegra 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I absolutely love your channel!

  • @dylanforwalk612
    @dylanforwalk612 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Picked up 26whp with a 102 tb and a 102 fast LSXR on a Heads cam 6.0. I’d say that’s worth the cost

  • @Turbogto_guy
    @Turbogto_guy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man you already know we are always down for more options!

  • @ryanwilliams1651
    @ryanwilliams1651 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good morning Richard. Thank you for all of the awesome content. I have a 2003 Gmc with 4.8 and 4l60e I inherited from my father. 210k driven by an elderly man. never towed, never hauled anything, never over 4500 rpm... runs great. future swap into a very nice 2001 jeep Tj. I would like to build as much low rpm torque as possible. Any thoughts?

  • @leam1966
    @leam1966 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I run a LS6 on my 430 lsx turbo set up and if I am worried about 20 hp I just turn the boost up s cupel of pounds I have a pretty big turbo and went 8s with 16 psi I can turn it up to 30 + psi ls6 for a turbo works excellent i paid 100 bucks for it and a 80mm after market Tb

  • @LukeSportsman
    @LukeSportsman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    MAXSPEEDING. NOT a specific product question but a "material" process they market is where my curiosity lies. I can't find any true definition of TITANIZING. now sure it sounds sexy as Pankle Ti rods , but what is it seriously? I do have a couple of their gt35s but haven't been spun them in anger yet. Using the pair at a pair on a mild budget Dart 347.

    • @LukeSportsman
      @LukeSportsman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      $547 for set of Titanizing 996TT rods sounds "too good" and the cost in this application of failure is too high. Maybe a set in a 4.8 and big bang it for rod comparison.

    • @timothybayliss6680
      @timothybayliss6680 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I like the idea of jamming all the their stuff into a 2.0l vw and see what it will do compared to a stock one. Those come with over 300hp stock in the right econo box and can take some serious whipping.

  • @xGrassNinja
    @xGrassNinja 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    id love to see the BTR intake tested!!

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      only good for very high rpm

    • @xGrassNinja
      @xGrassNinja 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@richardholdener1727 I had figured because of the short runner design. I’m just curious if their claims can be backed up!

  • @idisaunders9503
    @idisaunders9503 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Watching all of your videos from Bahamas. Great content!❤💯

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I've been there-very nice Mon!

    • @idisaunders9503
      @idisaunders9503 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richardholdener1727 Yer buddy you content and info is top.i studied auto mechanics & love how you test different configurations and explain it.if you ever come to Bahamas look me up I will carry you to the Bahamas race track.You would love it❤🇧🇸keep up the good work bro!💯🧐

  • @BOOSTJUNKY
    @BOOSTJUNKY 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Id love to see u use their turbos they actually are under 200 bucks for a ft42 while cx racing or w.e that brand u used to used raised their prices to over 600 because of your videos

  • @Averysimons2012
    @Averysimons2012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    lets see some vortec 4200 I6 testing

  • @okthen6470
    @okthen6470 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Have used maxxedspeeding rods products with good results. Mostly fittings or cosmetics though. Most "important" product I've used was their throttle body. Typical 4 bolt dbc china throttle body but didn't have the issues as others have like loose screws. Would be interested if their turbos and stuff compare with vs racing.

    • @dennisrobinson8008
      @dennisrobinson8008 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maxpeeding rods has decent quality control and improves specific products over time.

  • @kellyheath8547
    @kellyheath8547 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would love to see more mfg's offer up parts for a torture test. pistons and rods for sure. cylinder heads would be cool too.

  • @DNA54
    @DNA54 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why don't you ever include 5.7 in the cathedral port engine sizes? Every time you only talk about 4.8 5.3 6.0

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If you can't extrapolate between the 5.3l and 6.0L results, I have failed you!

    • @jasperpipes4222
      @jasperpipes4222 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richardholdener1727 * Interpolate :-)

  • @CalebBaker500
    @CalebBaker500 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I bought MaxpeedingRods for my 4 cylinder turbo build, haven't installed them yet, but I'm curious how they'd do for you. I've heard mixed results online, but thought at the price point they could be really good value for a forged rod compared to the big guys at double the price. Keeping my fingers crossed that they don't break. Lol.

  • @bcbloc02
    @bcbloc02 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Superflow would be a great channel sponsor. :-)

  • @manitoublack
    @manitoublack 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    what about the 5.7L Cathedral ports (because Australia, hahaha)
    Also thought the Edelbrock X-Ram was pretty close to the Fast?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      X Ram might be close-5.7L is right between the 5.3L and 6.0L

    • @manitoublack
      @manitoublack 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@richardholdener1727 I know. Just throwing chips 🍟 from the gallery

  • @allarvalksaare7617
    @allarvalksaare7617 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Maxspeedingrods, yeah right, try the gt35 turbo, its complete garbage, i have had two of them, the first i bought, the second i got as a replacement, both of them had a bearing issue. The rods however would be interesting on a setup, to see the limit of the rod. Should go 200hp/cyl as every other chinese rod goes.

  • @joeyjojojr.shabadoo915
    @joeyjojojr.shabadoo915 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I know, I know.... 'Overall Displacement = Power', but I would still like to see a 6.0L LS Shootout between a factory geometry 6.0L LS and a 6.0L 4" Stroked .20 over 4.8/5.3 block. WHY ? It's the average guy that already owns either a 4.8 or 5.3 that wants more power, so why toss the baby with the bathwater ?
    Regardless of platform, most guys will buy pistons & rods as a minimum, for peace of mind and the reliability for future added power. Not every 4.8L guy out there wants to solve their under-powered problems with forced induction or a junkyard 6.0L (to start with anyway). NOW, depending on your location, 6.0L longblocks are worth their weight in gold and 4.8's are literally being given away. From Summit's 'Pro' house brand (for instance) a $700 4" Stroker Crankshaft (along with your PURCHASED donor 4.8) is less money than what many people want for a 6.0L longblock. If you already own the 4.8/5.3 ? EVEN BETTER. Either way, machining costs etc will be the same, assuming an overbore.
    For a Street Car project by way of a Classic Car that weighs a ton, or even a large SUV, the drivability under 6500RPM SHOULD favor the long stroke 6.0L combo in comparison to the factory geometry 6.0L thanks to the stroke. Again, from what I have learned from watching your channel, the overall HP should be very similar, since the displacement will be similar. It's not like back in the 305 days with small bore. We now have good cylinder heads that support that small bore.
    Feel free to look into the math yourself. Whether you start out currently owning a 4.8/5.3 or need to pick one up from the boneyard for your project, the price of that motor + a 4" stroke crankshaft most times is cheaper than buying a 6.0L for the project. Either way you will buy rods and pistons and everything else will more or less cancel itself out in the end in terms of costs/labor. I simply want to see a realistic daily-driver-hotrod sub-6500RPM comparison and the benefits of achieving displacement using stroke to get to roughly 6.0L, rather than GM's big bore factory geometry offering. This is for those current 4.8/5.3 owners where most wish they had a 6.0L to solve all their problems.
    No expensive high RPM valvetrain, no over priced intake manifolds and less focus on that big HP number that doesn't help anyone 24/7 daily driving. Power and more importantly, Torque where people actually use it 99% of the time, still with the ability to spin big RPM if they so desire.
    Thanks for all the great content and sorry for the Novel sized post.

  • @klampykixx
    @klampykixx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello from Australia.
    Im looking at tweaking a trusty Jeep 4.0 and was looking at a custom modified stock intake, but with a larger plenum. Then I saw a reference to some giant plenum. Is there a video of yours i can watch on plenum volumes? I honestly believe the factory setup is super restricted as its a carb style thats been tweaked for injection and needs a bigger cross section to encourage even flows to all cylinders.
    Hit me back

  • @hoost3056
    @hoost3056 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A short runner intake can work if the boost ramp can be controlled some kind of way. For example, a variable geometry turbine hot side can boost torque under the curve to fill in the torque loss or use an electronic boost controller to ramp in the boost sooner. Why not do a test showing the effect of variable geometry turbos versus fixed, and electronic boost controllers vs. mechanical?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      a short-runner intake always does the same thing-it makes less than the long runner til very high rpm-changing the boost curve works with both

  • @dennisrobinson8008
    @dennisrobinson8008 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That 4.8 made good power and tq

  • @Belktronix
    @Belktronix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'd like to see what designs you come up with if you had a 3d printer.... Why is the throttle body always mounted horizontal? I have yet to see one mounted on top (in line with the runners, like a carb)...I've learned allot, but the jello is still congealing...lol

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      look at the new 5.7L Hemi video and the throttle body on that stock intake

  • @brianmoody4021
    @brianmoody4021 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm interested in how the edelbrock victor jr with throttle body compared to fast manifold under boost

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      loses power through most of the curve (its short runner like the fab manifold)-see the LS intake video

    • @brianmoody4021
      @brianmoody4021 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for your reply I really enjoy your vidios

  • @danieldelpha1315
    @danieldelpha1315 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Its the edelbrock rpm air gap of LS 😆

  • @sixesand9s56
    @sixesand9s56 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I would be interested in seeing how the max speeding SBC roller lifters do at $135 a set

  • @alltheboost5363
    @alltheboost5363 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I've looked at Maxspeeding rods... I have always been curious how good they are.

    • @maxwellhughes7821
      @maxwellhughes7821 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No better than any of the other chinese resellers. Some parts are great, some are garbage.

  • @ryanhines719
    @ryanhines719 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nope never heard of them. Also would like to see hi ram intakes vs low ram intakes on boosted and see what’s better. Looking to use a tunnel ram/ ram air intake on a bbc twin turbo

    • @GnarshredProductions
      @GnarshredProductions 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      that would work well the long runners would help with mid range power which would also help turbo response in the mid range.

  • @Shadow0fd3ath24
    @Shadow0fd3ath24 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    6800rpm you gained 60hp with a fast intake over a ls1 intake...thats insane

  • @JohnReynolds661
    @JohnReynolds661 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    FAST may work well, but they have the absolute worst customer service. I've been on the phone for tech support for over an hour and a half, I'm not joking.

  • @parkeranderson5074
    @parkeranderson5074 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When you say “overseas” where exactly are they located?

  • @701garage
    @701garage 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Is the twin gt45 to big for a LS 6.0 to spool for street driving or should I go with like a gtx3582r?

    • @Prestiged_peck
      @Prestiged_peck 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The bigger the turbo, the more lag you'll have? Answer? Put a 2-step on your clutch and always stay in boost!

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      twin GT35s will work

    • @timothybayliss6680
      @timothybayliss6680 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If it's a real gtx3582r Garrett turbo, it will move almost as much air as the ebay gt45. The genii compressors have a 66mm inducer and flow more than 80lb min. One guy has claimed 800whp on a 5.3l with a single turbo. The Garrett turbos come with a single scroll turbine, which is nice if you have twins, with a handful of different ARs. My next question is, why do you need so much turbo on the street if you are worried about lag? The gen1 gtx3582r flows more than 70lb min with a 62.5mm inducer, two of them gives you enough for 1500hp. If you need less than 1000hp on the street an even smaller turbo would be better for everyone. Two gtx3071r would be enough for almost 1200hp and if you're worried about spool...

  • @jasonayotte9467
    @jasonayotte9467 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Richard, on the ls6 manifold are you using the 78mm tb?

  • @awake-not-woke
    @awake-not-woke 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The runners split apart from 8psi on my FAST manifold. It was great for NA but not boost.

  • @kylekoltes1715
    @kylekoltes1715 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Richard, when you start testing LS engines in your Nova what RPM will you generally set your shift points at? Mainly 5.3/6.0's.

  • @craiga9492
    @craiga9492 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Max speedy or whatever must be pretty confident they're making decent stuff if they're willing to have it torture tested lol

  • @mechanicsinherited7079
    @mechanicsinherited7079 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the tbss intake the Same that was used on the nbs Silverado. Like 2007 and up?

  • @mavsformulaful
    @mavsformulaful 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The number of similar turbo recommendations you get is funny.

  • @rogerherring772
    @rogerherring772 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Let them send parts, and show what there claims are, verify the claims and find there limits. Just have them pick up the machine shop and junk yard tabs as well

  • @808redneckify
    @808redneckify 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I sure hope Richard is getting some kick back from Fast. I'm sure he just sold a bunch of intakes🤣🤣🤣

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      kick back would be nice-its almost X mas-still waiting...........

  • @MB-ib5ji
    @MB-ib5ji 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So question for you Richard and everyone else is it better economically wise for the money to go out and spend the money to buy a factory 6 liter or put a stroker kit in a 5.3?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      6.0L

    • @MB-ib5ji
      @MB-ib5ji 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richardholdener1727 well thank you very much I value your opinion I have been a mechanic for 30 something years and love the fact that you use science and not sponsorship money to form your opinions keep up the good work

  • @Prestiged_peck
    @Prestiged_peck 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Richard, crazy question, but I've never seen it tested, can you actually gain horsepower by using high end oils (think amsoil, royal purple, redline) over, say, store brand synthetic, or (god forbid) conventional?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      changing weight makes more of a difference than brand (most use the same base stock)

  • @andyharman3022
    @andyharman3022 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's a lot of LS engines revving to 7000 rpm to make peak power. That may be OK for drag racing, but I'm a road course guy, and am pretty skeptical about long-term (100 track hours) durability when shifting above 6000 rpm. Do you have any examples you can cite of LS engines durability in road course applications? My 2002 LS1 Camaro ran like a champ through 15 years of road course use, accumulating ~180 hours on track. I was very consistent with a 5500 rpm shift point, although I did rev to fuel cutoff (6000) a couple of times to win $$$ in time trials. (What the heck, 50 bucks is 50 bucks.)

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      lots of drag race stuff running 7K, I'm less familiar with the road race guys longevity (though I'm a road race guy myself)