I Cracked 8 Vintage PSA Cards and Submitted to SGC. Here Are the Results...
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ส.ค. 2024
- BASEBALL CARD COLLECTOR INVESTOR DEALER (in that order)
Chris Sewall here.
If you have a collection you would be interested in selling me, you can email me at:
sewallsportscards@gmail.com
collectorinvestordealer.com
============================================================
If you really enjoy my content, you're welcome to support me and my channel with a donation via PayPal.
Link to PayPal donation: paypal.me/Chri....
============================================================
YOU CAN CHECK OUT SOME OF MY CARDS FOR SALE:
My COMC account: www.comc.com/U....
My eBay store: www.ebay.com/u...
============================================================
You can also support the channel but checking out some of our quality affiliates:
CIA Auctions: collectorinves...
Card Hedge: www.cardhedger...
============================================================
CHANNEL SCHEDULE (all videos post 9:00am EST):
Every WEDNESDAY: High Rollers/Regular Rollers (alternating)
Every SATURDAY: Miscellaneous (Reveals, Lists, etc)
Some MONDAYs: Miscellaneous (Stories, Hobby News, etc)
=============================================================
baseball cards, football cards, basketball cards, hockey cards, soccer cards, t206 Honus Wagner, 1952 topps mickey mantle, 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson, 1933 goudey babe ruth, 1989 upper deck Ken Griffey Jr, 1993 SP Derek Jeter, 1981 Topps Joe Montana, 2017 Patrick Mahomes, 1996 Topps Chrome refractor Kobe Bryant, 1986 fleer michael jordan RC, 2003 exquisite, 2003 topps chrome gold refractor LeBron James, 2000 Tom Brady, 2017 Patrick Mahomes, Mike Trout, Steph Curry, Lionel Messi, National Treasures, 2012 panini prizm, silver prizm, panini flawless, ebay, PSA, Beckett, BGS, SGC, BVG, GEM MINT 10, PRISTINE 10, HGA, CSG, GMA, Goldin auction, Heritage auction, Pwcc, probstein123, COMC, starstock, card ladder, bowman chrome xfractor, Rookie card, rookie patch autograph, RPA, donruss optic holo
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.4 (4/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/d3l5rxl5CVo/mqdefault.jpg)
That '67 Mantle was definitely the deal maker! Thanks for taking the time to do this experiment! Have a very successful National!
I don’t want to sound like a conspiracy theorist but I’ve been saying for years that these grading companies are pop controlling those Ray Benge cards.
Haha love it
I mean, it's easy to see once you realize the grader hates the Packers... just rearrange the letters of Ray Benge and you get Green Bay... hence the low score...😂😅🤣😆
PSA pop controls pokemon, especially XY Evolutions, that's the set responsible for the PSA backup in 2020, clowns were sending in thousands of cards try to get a Gemed master set or hundreds of charizards to pass off to the clowns who think it'll be the next Vase set😂
Wouldn’t be surprised if that is the case. Also, I trust SGC more than PSA when it comes to vintage. I also believe the SGC slab looks better when it comes to vintage. I hope collectors stop giving PSA a big edge when it comes to valuation of vintage cards. They should be held in equal regard
A few years ago, a TH-cam channel by the name of Vintage Card Curator made a number of videos scrutinizing PSA's practices ("pop control" allegations, authenticating and grading altered cards, etc.). Well worth checking out even in 2024.
Rumor is that’s Jim Brown’s Caddy in the background.
That 100% is his Pink Caddilac, he requested that he be photographed with it behind him.
Check out the rest of the Browns from that set. All of them have the parking lot background. LOL
That is NOT Jim Brown’s Cadillac in the background. 100%
@@gridironstarscorrect, it was Not his car
Hi Chris. I think vintage cards look great in SGC slabs. Thank you for sharing the video.
Thank you for sharing this with us. I think many of us believed this was a good idea.
1964 Jim Brown, the Pink Cadillac in the background is his personal car.
You will find other cards from that year of his team mates in front of the same car.
They look sooo much better in sgc slabs. I can't imagine choosing psa over sgc for a personal collection
I haven't really collected cards since 2009. SGC has made collecting fun for me again with their pricing, turnaround times, & overall solid reputation in the collecting community. Thanks for the video.
Nice video Chris! Recently, I had some vintage cards I was considering sending to SGC for grading. You convinced me that was the right choice after watching your PSA reveal video a month ago.
Two of the cards were a 1967 Topps Hank Aaron #250 and a 1971 Topps Hank Aaron #400, both in PSA 6. I cracked both of them and sent five additional cards (7 total) to SGC a couple of weeks ago.
The order returned today and both of the Aaron cards received a grade of SGC 7.5. Based on the average VCP price this equated to a $125 increase in value for the ‘71 and a $200 plus increase in value for the ‘67.
As others have mentioned, they also look great in SGC slabs. All these cards were PC for me.
One item of note - if you are afraid of damaging the card when you crack it out from the slab (like I am), for the same $15 grading fee you can send the slabbed cards to SGC and specify the lowest grade you will accept in your "crossover" attempt to an SGC holder. This will take a bit longer than the regular 5-10 day business day turnaround time but may be worth it if you want to maintain the current grade in a PSA slab. I've used this service a few times and you can include a crossover attempt in your regular raw card SGC grading submissions.
Do you think it affects the grade they issue, for example, SGC sees the card in a PSA 3 slab, and figure they shouldn’t grade it much higher?
A lot of people think the current grade will affect the grader which is why they crack them. Most people will tell you there’s very low success with crossovers
I think it is human nature to look closely but I doubt that all of his cards would have gotten the bump perhaps a few but you can't unsee the PSA grades so it has to affect it.
It's not what you know, it's who you know. Fact's 💯
I have found that SGC grades consistently reflect SGC standards more accurately. this experiment confirms my own anecdotal observation. I think this is a perfect example of why, for collectors, SGC has been taking market share away from PSA: their grades and our eyeballs are in harmony.
Thier grades are slightly higher but bring slightly less money it's almost beautiful how it all works out so harmonic the card in psa holder with a 4 brings same money as the card in sgc 5 it actually is one aspect of grading that this 1 time made complete sense
Totally agree…..about 2 months after the 2022 induction, I sent a Tony Oliva 1963 Topps rookie to PSA. They gave it a 4 and I assumed it would be a 6 or 7, based off of recent ones that had been graded. I cracked it and sent it to SGC and got a 7.5 on it
And at that point, ir had been about 4 months post-induction. I then sold the card (on eBay) for $427 and looked the next week and saw that a PSA 5 had sold for $378. The discrepancy in prices IS ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS between PSA & SGC. Imo the SGC slabs look WAAAAAAAAY BETTER on most vintage. They grade more fairly and they’re quicker. I wish people would wake up and see that PSA IS A GIANT PONZI SCHEME, built by the hobby elite (who spend so much $ with PSA that they get grades that us collecting peons could never afford). PSA is the sports card equivalent of governmental kickbacks!!! It is DISGRACEFUL!
@@Mr.JonDoEagree. From MY experience I believe SGC grades easier.
You are very polite, Chris. "Puzzler" sounds like a euphemism for "wrong."
No, not "wrong" but tougher graders. I rather buy those slabs.
Not only did you receive better/more consistent grades... the aesthetics and overall presentation of the cards is infinitely better in the SGC slabs. So much more attractive than the unflattering PSA slabs, it's not even close. People are finally waking up to this, it seems.
This basically validated PSAs thoughts when you consider SGC is usually a little softer
I’m of the opinion that PSA was softer, and recently started to get get harder.
Or... SGC is in line with proper, industry grading standards and PSA is heading off the deep end in overcompensating and going TOO strict.
There's charts that outline what constitutes an approximate grade for each major card feature (centering, corners, edges, etc). These things have been known for 75 years in collecting. When Chris says "I think this should get a # ", that's the historic data/standard he's pulling from.
Psa waaay softer, clear dimples on cards getting 10’s. people use psa for their horrid grading standards
Good job chris!! Hope you offer more of these for us following
Really interesting results, yet not all that surprising. Thanks for taking the time to follow through with this, it's very helpful.
They just sit back, collect the money and hope people resend them back to collect more.
There's often no other explanation than this. And I'm not one for wearing tin foil hats. Or PSA is just so bad at what they do. Either way, this reflects poorly on them.
Another fantastic upload, Chris.
It certainly reinforces, to me at least, the subjecte nature of card grading, and the pitfalls of a company that is a clear market-leader (when you crunch the numbers).
Keep up the great content, and thank you for sharing your experiments with us all. Very educational!
The eye appeal on the Doer makes it a premium seller. Put it next to any other 2.5 with edge wear, etc. and this one will sell first every time. It looks so good. Also on a mini documentary or short for PSA they showed them using a scanner. Possibly small creases are seen in a scan and not to the naked eye? The cards in general have great eye appeal.
Appreciate the experiment, Chris! From my experience, PSA is usually at what I expect or higher, SGC a grade lower, but consistant. There are certain graders at PSA that grade lower than expected too.
You did the right thing on this. Nice work listening to the comments! Even though the Jordan wasn't part of the original 8 card experiment, you should look at that as a positive in SGC's favor as well!
I have graded with all the four major grading companies. My experience mirrors yours, in that I have seen more inconsistencies with PSA grades than any of the other companies. To call them puzzlers is interesting. I have cracked a few to get comparisons like you did in this video. My experience has been that it’s more like a two grade miss from PSA, so a little bit more off than what you had in this sample. To be clear, I don’t think PSA gets it wrong every time. But when they miss, it seems to be relatively egregious.
Thanks for all of your videos! I really enjoy all of your content.
I think i would have to DISAGREE with you on a previous point you made that psa is grading tougher to meet the demands of the market. They are clearly grading tougher in order to skew and control pop reports as this is reflected in your grade assessment, SGCs and even mine (i thought most were way undergraded by psa as well just by eye test).
In no way did psa reflect what any of us thought and knowing the trends of the market where psa high grade brings top dollar, their actions actively prove that.
It is major a statistical anomaly to have most cards grade higher and not a single one grade lower. Literally near impossible unless they are making a statement to selectively make things more difficult to grade higher. Earlier you said their standards have changed as the consumer have changed, but this is NOT what consumers want and its unfortunate what you had to go through. The only way now is to grade SGC or alternative, and it starts with dealers like you... I would put personal values over card value and psa obviously just doesnt care anymore as they get backlogged and raise prices with near none customer service, subpar standards, and artificially lowering grades as is the case here. They dont care anymore so why should we?
SGC is the way to go. Thanks for the info. GREAT VID!
Saw the end of the video got my answer. Thanks for the video.
Agree with you on multiple points. If I were in your position, I think I would go completely with SGC on vintage cards. Use PSA for the modern, only because of the resale value.
Jim's caddy was a 9 back in that day of the photograph. Today it has no original parts, and does not run, so it's now an "Authentic Altered". ;)
Beckett brings more value... Real collector's want that. J.s
in general, I subtract 1 from the grade on SGC which mostly lines up with this
Chris you didn’t pick any outliers. Its well-known PSA has become super strict on vintage as of late. Although it sucks to have a low-grade, the well-known vintage collector will know the difference between a new and old serial number. The condition contrast is so vast. I’ve seen quite a range of sales history vary between the same card/grades depending on how recently it was submitted.
I trust Chris and his experience over whoever did the grading for psa. Proves psa is not to be trusted. Yet people slavishly send them their cards.
Great analysis, thanks Chris!
Not sure if you financially benefited as much your chart says…. Even one grade lower I wouldn’t be shocked if the PSA copy would’ve sold for higher anyway. But def improvement in the brooks psa 3 and mantle authentic.
Great video!!
Great video, Chris. Further community evidence PSA’s 19 year-old graders are ill trained, overworked, and careless.
Great video, thanks for sharing this one!
As one of the original commenters who suggested this, I feel kind of vindicated. With the caveats that I know 1) you know the hobby better than I do 2) do this for a living, and 3) PSA resale is generally higher than SGC, I still feel like some of your takeaways match my personal experience. SGC is faster, more consistent, has better customer service, and seems to understand vintage grading better than PSA. If this experiment causes you to use SGC more frequently for vintage than previously, I feel like its going to benefit you more financially and benefit the hobby, as your influence would help other vintage collectors.
Thanks as always for your transparent, fair, and well presented videos.
Exactly my experience after grading hundreds of cards with both companies. SGC now gets the bulk of my business as a result
Seems like sgc saw the same micro defects as psa but gave you a higher grade for centering.
I did the same Please Submit Again and every card got 1 to 3.5 better I don’t trust these people with my cards GO SGC
The authentic bump to 4.5 was the hit. The rest made absolutely no difference. The bump makes up for the sgc price difference from psa this is the 1 time i actually have to say grading was in balance the psa 5 was worth about the same as sgc 6. For once the grading makes sense. Please more video's like this to help people understand it is what it is but its level across the board.
The problem is obvious...and I'll state the obvious. The problem is that the "major companies" rely on human beings to complete the grading. So naturally you'll get, and continue to get, puzzlers.
I'm convinced the only accurate rating would be through these computer generated grading companies (ie: TAG, AGS, etc).
I refuse and will NEVER submit any of my cards to PSA, SGC or any other human graded company. I've watched too many of these sort of videos and have learned that lesson without having to spend one penny.
It would be interesting to assign the research department the task of taking one of your recent PSA vintage orders and comping out the PSA grade values, the equivalent SGC grade value and maybe SGC +1 grade values and then see in theory what would have been best to send to.
I've been a card dealer since the late 80s. My first 10 years of submitting to PSA I was 90% spot on with my grading. The last 10 years it has dropped to around 80%. Which tells me there is definitely some inconsistenties of late. I use a loop and literally triple check my vintage submissions. The worst thing i remember was when PSA decided to go to half grades. I sent in a bunch of high end 8s hoping for 8.5s. Two came back 7s? Unfortunately Bird/Magic rookie and a 67 Clemente. So then I cracked and sent to Beckett and both came back 8.5s.
Quite a hassle but just shows the inconsistencies.
Gotta factor in your time as well. I did this with similar order, 10 vintage cards SGC VS PSA, mine was done in reverse.
Appreciate the experiment. I submitted nice 1938 churchman joe louis and jack johnson to psa and they came back 3s. I cracked and resubmitted to psa again and one came back a 5 and 6. Different graders i guess. Nice to get the grades i expected. Too bad only psa made money on the deal.
I am totally with you on this one Chris I recently sent a Jake lamotta leaf rookie in to P S.A. And it came get back ungraded, Then I cracked it and sent it to SCG, it came back a 5 P S.A. Has really become inconsistent
My last 2 PSA submissions have seriously turned me off to getting cards graded as an investment business model. Any grading "surprises" were always a worse grade than expected, never higher. Just too many "puzzlers" that got me pretty pissed. I have one more submission and that will be the last chance for PSA. If I get burned there, I'll be closing my account with them.
@@twoshedsjohnson8540 do you use a magnifying glass for the corners and edges? Do you measure at least to 1/64 of an inch tolerance?
@@garygor1960 I do use a lighted magnifying glass and am thorough checking corners/edges/surface. Will say though that PSA contacted me about my recent submission and wanted me to confirm/accept 3 grades that would push the value of the graded card over the dollar limit for that submission. Getting them back today, so excited to see if this will be a redemption for them. Crossing my fingers.
I sent 15 cards to PSA and was majorly disappointed . Some of them I am the original owner and I've had since I was a kid and they were kept in an album . I had a Jerry rice rookie , Steve Young rookie's that were absolutely beautiful . Sharp corners very well centered and came back with moderate grades . Next time I will go to Beckett or SGC
The one grade higher on average is typical because PSA grades tougher and why they sell for more. The authentic is because PSA looks at every card under a blue light in a dark room which SGC does not! They are not as thorough. PSA saw something on it which is very common for older cards. Also you CANNOT look at these cards with your naked eye and expect to see what the graders are seeing with a loupe.
Ive sent card to psa expecting an 8 and received a 10. Ive also sent in perfect cards that come back as an 8. One batch gets an accurate grade and the next is all over the place. Their quality control and consistency is garbage for the past few years.
NOPE
Have you seen some PSA 10 off centered. PSA owns you literally
@matthew1072a that is completely wrong. Differing light sources is used by all the major grading companies and has been talked about by them. The authentic was because psa deemed it to small. Which back then was common and expected considering the printing and cutting processes used back then.
@@jeffniles7121look at their grading standards. It’s printed on the website. It literally says a 10 can be 60/40. They have been know for going easier on centering for decades.
those Doerr grades are a joke, a very minor stain on the back of the card should not knock that down so low.. i can see it being a 6-7 range knocked down to like a 4-5, but 2 suggests it's almost ruined
Great video,I haven't sent any vintage to PSA in 2 years
I have always felt that SGC gives vintage cards the grade(s) they deserve, and PSA gives vintage cards 1-2 grades lower then they deserve. This logic seems to hold true based on your video findings.
I wish that were true, myself and thousands more would be buying anything PSA under 6 and crossing flipping. Maybe they are doing it...time will tell.
It may well be Brown's Caddy in the background. But the reason it's there is Philadelphia used that generic photo as the background for many of the Brown's cards that year(it's an obvious photoshop).
Overall vintage just looks better in SGC slab
Agree sgc is more consistent with their cards
I'll stick with old faithful. Mint,good,fair,used. The way it has been graded by those who lived it.
You should crossover the Brooks and Mantle to PSA and see what they do.
@adamroth8634 they were already in psa slabs, and graded terribly hence the reason to crack and send to sgc
@@richardbianco9674 I think the point of the crossover back to psa is he could probably get a 4.5/5 on the Brooks and a 3.5/4 on the Mantle after first getting a 3 and an auth respectively.
@@adamroth8634 there's no point now. The amount spent to do that would end up having a net loss. With these grades, value is pretty much equal anyway
That Mantle was nice!
Your experience with PSA crossovers to SGC is similar to mine. Try higher end card crossovers (PSA 7-9) as well... you'll be pleased and surprised.
Very cool experiment! SGC gets most of my vintage and I do pretty well value wise. They just get it right more often.
That Goudey looked rough in the PSA slab I had a feeling you were SOL on that one with the resub even with SGC's slightly easier usual results. The 2 looks appropriate to me with those rounded corners (surface obviously tougher to gauge via video). I will pay at/near PSA same grade prices for high eye appeal/centered SGC though.
Ive found I like my cards in one screw or magnetic holders best. Anyone who has collected a long time can look at a card and be within a grade at worst case. No need to waste our money. Sure go grade that Mantel RC but… I have a lot more cards, because I don’t give my money to graders.
As a collector/investor who never sells, I only submit to SGC.
genuinely curious, if your never selling and just for PC why waste money grading
@@thesummerhummer protection and authentication would be why most do
@@richardbianco9674 Except, PSA and SGC too, have graded trimmed and altered cards
shoulda send dem back to psa and check out their.... consistancy
I think its interesting they were all so close
You didn't factor the cost (and loss) of the original PSA grading into the equation. Had you not sent them to PSA in the first place you'd be well ahead versus now where you effectively paid them to drop the ball. It's definitely a feather in SGC's cap if you don't want to roll the dice with PSA's "outlier" results, which for all you know could be more often than you might realize.
I would argue you would have also gotten similar results just sending back to PSA. Would be an interesting for a second test for the "puzzlers". Just got a small order back with a heavy percentage of "puzzlers" myself. Used to be just one or two per order, this last one was 40% of the order total head scratchers
Midlife showed that SGC in an extensive study that surprisingly SGC Is outperforming PSA on sales
I dont know what kind of study he did, but SGC does not, and has not EVER sold for more than PSA in the same grade.
@@Brandonnn3 I can look up the Midlife study.... your caps locked letters didn't provide any convincing information.. thanks.
@@Brandonnn3 just for vintage, SGC is clearly equal or even outperforming PSA
@@oralaric I checked comps on a random card. 1959 Topps Mantle. PSA outselling SGC on all fronts. Wherever you got your information from, its wrong. Dont spread misinformation. Maybe on some fringe niche card SGC sells for more than PSA, but in every other case PSA outsells SGC. Thanks.
@@willybe6427 You can look up comps for yourself. I don't need a random study to quickly check if SGC sells for more than PSA in the same grade. And the answer is it doesnt. Same grade, same centering? PSA is still king and its not even close.
The grading business has become a racket. It’s like DeBeers and the diamond industry. Control the supply - control the price.
You see how many cards these companies are grading each month right? You really think they’re that organized to “control the supply”?
@@dcsoda1 Maybe? However, don’t you think it’s possible they have all the submissions and grades entered into a spread sheet data base ?
The technology is there to track population etc… look at the Topps 78’ Nolan Ryan #400 for proof. And look at who is getting the highest grades. It isn’t “John Doe” The table is tilted - the game is rigged.
@@jonathanbeyer7852 indeed I do not think that’s possible. Or worth the level of effort you’re describing.
Definitely interesting results, particularly with some cards that were close in grades, but SGC was never below the PSA grade. I assume the Doerr and Benge have some hard-to-see wrinkle that is obvious under magnification but not to the naked eye. I wonder if the PSA guarantee makes them particularly tough graders, particularly after PSA was purchased by a large company that wanted to reign in any grade guarantee claims and make the guarantee less of a liability.
More proof that grading is subjective, which is why I have a problem with grading.
Extremely interesting
Chris, you are sooooo polite! Sorry you had to waste more time and money on grading, due to PSA's incompetence. But perhaps you'll make it back if/when you go to sell these cards with their proper new grades. Thanks for the update!
PSA continues to be harsh on vintage, thanks for sharing this
Great stuff, congrats
I would think most low to mid grade vintage would be the best for SGC in terms of being a dealer. There's not a big difference in prices as those cards usually aren't something that set registry people are looking for. Also, a lot of collectors of those types of cards already use SGC or don't have any issue with buying the slabs....they usually aren't as wedded to PSA.
@Kbunk_Youth_Football_Wrestling bingo. When sgc finally gets it's set registry together, this may change though. But that is the one major factor especially with higher graded cards
PSA has damaged my cards more than once! Straight facts! I have sent cards that I have had under 30x micro ran a black light over perfect centered on front and back…it was a 1975 topps football Roy Gerela…not a highly prized card. It was the best card in terms of condition I have from the 75 set by a mile. What I get back? 5…..why? Suddenly it has a bent corner folded over and then straightened! Never ever ever again will I send cards!
Thank you for the very interesting experement! Other than the Mantle, I would have not cracked the PSA slabs and resubmitted - risk / reward not woth it to me.. PS - Mntle is probably worth abot $100 more non-auction from when yoiur analysis was done. Good stuff!!!
I only use sgc I don't like psa. If I buy a card graded by psa I crack it and send to sgc if it's not a 10. If it's a 10 I keep is psa
I think the answers really really easy for you. Low grade vintage is more properly graded. . Less cost. ... And comes back quicker. That is probably a No brainer
hard to argue with your logic
@wheetie7 that was my original point the first time. Ironically they logic fits even more on modern. With sgc not upcharging on cards 2000 or newer, the grading cost can be vastly different.
And they all went up on appearance being in a TUX!
I support robo umps and robo graders. I mean, heaven forbid I draw Angel Hernandez on my PSA order.
Besides the '67 Mantle, you wouldn't have gained anything from submitting to SGC--therefore, PSA would still make the most sense financially for reselling. However, you did get video revenue I assume for this project so it was worth the effort. I love this type of video segment you create. Thank you
Re-selling is not the only factor. Anyone who wants to display their cards (and isn't vision-impaired) would prefer the aesthetics of the SGC slab. And recent data shows SGC quickly gaining ground + even surpassing PSA in many cases.
It would be interesting to have cracked the cards and resubmit to PSA
PSA would be all over the board again. It's almost certain the cards would come back differently from the original submission. But in completely different ways, as PSA exhibits no consistency whatsoever.
As always, thanks for the videos!! Super helpful, I will be using SGC for vintage
Sgc does poor for auctions but as a buy it now you can get about the same as psa.
SGC certainly has more integrity w/ grades imo
They look so much better in the tux
PSA = Please Send Again
That's a hard way to make a hundred bucks!
it's a public service video, friend. a fascinating experiment with interesting results.
@@sisterraysbrotherfascinating? People do it all the time
The PSA order with the 8 bad grades,
did you notice where it was shipped from?
CA or NJ ?
I’d love to own the Doerr if you’re selling, Chris!
Those 1998 Upper Deck Black Diamonds look great, but are a tough grade. I'm making a set of football from that year, and it's hard to do much better than 8/8.5.
I don't get how PSA became the standard in grading. I never see videos complaining about SGC or even Beckett grades. Beckett customer service? Yes. But PSA continues to confound, frustrate, and in this case rob customers, and people just keep subbing. Weird
The only issue that i have with your experiment is that I have subbed hundreds of times with SGC and PSA and it has been my experience that SGC is more lenient than PSA regarding corners, so I would expect this batch to do a little better with SGC... In your original post I felt that there were several blunted corners in this collection that you missed or discounted... Usually, vintage cards are similar in most respects: corner condition matches surface condition matches edges, etc... But this lot has really nice surfaces and while that's good the grading process is one of subtraction, so i think the blunted corners are the culprit here... thanks for the vid!
not sure you are enlightening Mr. Chris Sewall. I'm guessing he absolutely did not "miss" or "discount" this vintage batch.
@@nathanmulkey Anyone who grades lots of vintage cards overlooks defects from time to time(myself included)... I think my comments were pretty constructive and I doubt Chris will understand them as anything else...
Great Video! Shows that SGC may make more sense in older cards!
now - send these SGC slabs to PSA as a crossover submission with no minimum grade. I bet they all cross over at these same grades
That 1958 Brooks Robinson has such an ugly photo, all copies of this card should grade a 1..
They do look better in the tux.
They recognized the submission as a regrade.
With PSA purchasing SGC, is this an attempt to pump up the new business model?
not trying to split hairs here but it is notable that PSA did NOT purchase SGC, COLLECTORS UNIVERSE (the parent company) did.
@@nathanmulkeywell said people get confused