If he said anything against Trump, Trumps next tweet would sound something like that: "Lying Tim Cook is a total loser, a discgrace for the American people..."
Stephen Wayda its business, look at cars that are purposely not suited to last 50 years, gaming consoles that are not adaptive to new gen games, same with phones and the list goes on. Get over it old timer
Bacdi Tuong Of course he doesn’t like Trump. I bet he hates him because of the Trump’s disgusting policies. But he is a CEO, and has to be diplomatic because Apple is dependent on good relations with the government.
MVE Trump’s disgusting Politics? Like what specifically? Or are you one of those people who say things about Trump and then have no evidence to back up their statement?
iBen agreed that’s insanely high, but the customers for that monitor probably either won’t opt for that, or won’t bat an eye at $1k. Whoever actually needs that monitor will not really care how expensive it is.
JR Rodri The exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service. "the state's monopoly of radio and television broadcasting" -So his opinion turned out to be a fact ;)
@@602liljr i think he was meaning the only tech company that you dont have to question whether its a monopoly or not.. not that it is the only non monopoly tech company
Stephen Wayda actually that’s no longer the case after the court case....IOS 12 increased the speeds of older devices significantly - and IOS 13 is gonna make app launch times 2x faster and now updates of apps will take less storage.
maldita peppas I’m not a “sheep” frankly it’s very childish how we’re all calling people names just because people have different views about things....I’m no “sheep” to any company, I’ve criticised Apple in the past, but I’ve also stuck up for them, in this case I am, as I’ve legit just pointed 2 ways how they’re not slowing down older devices anymore....Also IOS devices have the longest support, way ahead of Samsung where after 2 years, you can no longer get the latest Android OS...
SMP wym? He used Ima on purpose, and using also twice to describe one thing is not technically correct. Maybe you should check yourself before you yell at others
Great job Tim! This is why Apple is such a great company. Steve Jobs knew exactly what he was doing when he put you in charge of the ship. Keep doing a phenomenal job! I’ll never switch to any other product other than an Apple product. There’s no company like it!
This is WHY Apple is such a great company and makes great products, because it has such a great leader like Tim Apple. Now imagine the consequence of this country will have with our current president, sad!
"great products", the competitors have already caught up, this guy squandered the lead handed to him by Steve Jobs. Consequences? You do realize apple stuff used to be made in the US right. There are plenty of consequences for bad decisions. Now his guy peddles phones that are meant to fill land fills as they cannot be fixed, all the while hiding behind rainbow and green flags, pure hypocrisy is the truth of woke capital, sad indeed.
@@malditapeppas509 Well simply stated thats why its a Pro product... And I challenge you to go compare that monitor against others in its range and then look look at their prices...
@@malditapeppas509 I'm not talking about the stand, nobody cares about that, don't even waste time on it... I'm talking about the monitor... And no, the people who wanted this are pros, new Macs will come soon like they literally always have... I'm not sure what Macs your thinking people want
That wouldn't fit the topic of the interview anyway :) but yeah, that's an embarrassment to sell a stand for $999. No one would mind if a monitor with a stand cost $6999 instead of $5999 (it would still be worth the money) but selling a piece of aluminium for $999 just feels petty.
that was the best interview ever. clear questions clear answers. Apple CEO Tim Cook is the best Tech Ceo out there in our generation. The Lady questioning Tim deserve a recognition for such a smart, straight honest questions.
Obafemi Adaraloye not even close. This was clearly a liberal interviewer trying once again to use another public figure to destroy Trump. I’m so over it
See, you don't need the government to act on this. By means of competition, privacy is getting restored. No government would be able to do this. Thanks Apple!
@@kjr5034 Don't understand your point, if there is any. It's not that Apple is benevolent and wants to create privacy, we all know that. They do it because it's a great business strategy, that's the point. "It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own self-interest." Users start concerning about privacy, so the most privacy focused company will have an advantage. A design of genius, indeed, Capitalism.
She's like a robot when she speak LOL! and from this interview I can see now that Tim Cook does know what he's talking about, I see why Steve picked him in 2011 as CEO.
Church Channel now that we have the products we can always make them better without him. But what we cannot do is teach CEO’s Tim Cooks values. That’s what apple need now. A CEO like Tim Cook with great values and high emotional intelligence
We want to give our users more exclusive games, Apple TV+, Apple Card and “so much more” because we don’t care about people spending too much time on their phones, what matters in this life is money and our reputation. Thank you
I really hate the way the interviewing is done. It feels so unprofessional "so you're saying you're not a monopoly. But Elisabeth Waren says" - what kind of questioning is this supposed to be?
With screen time I notice that I was spending WAY to much time on social media and I locked all them apps at different times witch only gave me a few hrs per day to spend on them apps so now I spend more time getting my work done and because the apps are locked I spend more time with my family
The premise of some of this woman’s questions are so poor. She is more focused on painting Trump in a bad light rather than focusing on the facts and real issues with these topics.
The only way to activate Apple's new privacy feature (Sign in With Apple) designed to limit app tracking on iPhones, is if you activate Face ID. Users who don't use Face ID on their Xs/Xs Max/Xr devices (or those who have disabled this security feature after using it) won't be able to use their (anonymized) Apple emails to sign into apps, because of the "mandatory" Face ID step. This doesn't make sense at all! Consumers should have full freedom of choice as to how they wish to secure their devices (or other key features on their devices). Apple more or less is forcing consumers to use Face ID to use key features like Apple Pay, etc (and now the app privacy feature to be rolled out in iOS 13). The funny thing is Apple has a 2nd layer for securing Face ID, which is the good ol' passcode (you actually can't access "Face ID & Passcode" in Settings without entering a passcode). So the question is - Why doesn't iOS 13 give us the option of using a passcode to use Sign in With Apple to limit app tracking (and even use Apple Pay, etc)? Apple lacks an indepth understanding of privacy. To them it's a unique selling point (USP), especially that we are in the age of privacy. It's a strategy to be on the good side of history and Congress. But I don't think Apple understands the consumer freedom of choice that comes with privacy. Consumers should have options, don't just push a single solution at them in a " take it or leave it" manner - especially when it involves their biometrics and their faces. It's a matter of principle! Apple doesn't own the right to our faces or biometrics in the name of security (nor health). Regardless of how "secure or encrypted" this data is, Apple or anyone else have no right to what we own; we own our data, heart beat, thumb prints, and facial features. Apple says it believes "privacy is a human right," yet pushes Face ID on you like you have no say in it. This shows severe lack of understanding of consumer privacy on Apple's part. And while we're at it, Apple does not allow you to delete the Health app. iPhones have sensors that will soon be able to detect if women have their periods (in iOS 13 & beyond). You can disable the Health app, but for some odd reason, you cannot uninstall it altogether. Again, a tech company that truly respects consumers privacy would give them the leeway to uninstall the Health app and any native app that retains health & biometrics data.
I think you may have this slightly wrong regarding Apples new iOS 13 sign in with Apple. I’ve been reading Apples own press release and it states there that you can use Face ID or Touch ID to activate sign in.
@@juliebarker7025 There's no Touch ID on the new models Xs, Xs Max , and Xr. You only have one option and that is Face ID. Apple's press releases mention Touch ID to basically say older iPhones can use the security features they already have on them. Their website also says users can choose not to use Face ID, but doesn't say at what expense. Either way, Apple should give owners of new and old iPhones a second option that isn't based on their biometrics to activate Sign in With Apple. This option is passcodes.
Great idea get rid of iTunes a total waste ! Now put in a feature to browse your backup data and be able to edit your backup before a restore ..been waiting for that common sense feature since day 1
Such a great business leader who really respect people's free right and put the bullet where the call is, instead of being a hypocrite. Apple definitely can make much more money out of users data like Facebook/Instagram/Google are doing, but they did not.
Nonsense. Facebook is free, apple products are not. If they even tried to be like facebook, they'd lose their market in a day, they don't get credit for that, especially when they've been busy little censors, manipulating news feeds, gatekeeping based on politics in their closed ecosystem, their echo chamber which will become little more than an orwellian trap.All these companies are in their own way working towards a chinese internet, complete with social credit score, they are not to be defended. The more they build, the more aspects of life they begin to control, whether that be communications or financial transactions, the more dangerous they become as they have proven that they will leverage these powers to push their political bias.
Cook rehearses his interviews, he’s a good actor. What people should focus on is not what Cook says, it’s how apple is making its products which keep getting worse and people are under control over these companies. Apple needs another Steve Jobs. Not a Tim Cook.
Tim Cook is the best CEO after Steve Jobs. He is really focused on Privacy. And that’s great. I support Apple. We want privacy. Say no to Google and Facebook. And Chinese Company like Oppo, Vivo, Oneplus, Xiaomi.
“Hey guys, do you guys want to have the interview over here where we have all the chairs and tables?” “No it’s okay, we’ll just put 2 chairs here in the middle of the room where nothing is around us.”
No CEO truly cares about the people, just think this what idiot will go up on an interview and say "I think the government is filled with idiot's and Trump should get removed from office " he's being a people pleaser
Privacy is very reasonable thing to offer to users, but then again so is a cable of a $1200 phone that doesn't break 3 months after the purchase, or the keyboard of a $2000 laptop for that matter. And I'm writing this on a Macbook.
maximthefox they came up with the idea but they didn’t make it, the engineers made it Apple just want all the credits when actually the engineers deserves the credit for making it
Nice job Tim, i'm no fan of Apple but i like how he is profundly concertrating on privacy. Btw i always make sure when ever i'm using the net, i encrypt my paper trail because your ISP, trackers/advertisers and many foreign governments folow your everymove in the virtual world (internet) and can use your paper trail for misuse, abuse and threats.
If privacy becomes what everyone talks about , companies will tell you whatever you want to hear on this topic. Keep it in mind. Like Naomi Klein have pointed out long ago, every non-mianstream issue or core topic will be quickly adapted by marketing as a tool to make sales increase and to generate profit. All consumers should keep this in mind at all times. I'm not saying that companies being positively snobbish in this sense cannot sometimes bring in positive changes to society but at the end of the day it's mostly about company's profit margins and consumers should not lie to themselves that this is not the case and monitor companies activities anyway.
Tim’s got a lot of flack since he took over from Jobs, even today. But what can I say, I like the guy. I think a lot of it is petty and unfounded and I think he’s done a good job with Apple since he took over. The ‘Apple don’t innovate anymore crowd’ is a bit obnoxious if you ask me. There’s only so much groundbreaking innovating you can with a smartphone. And with Apple Silicon on it’s way I think he’s done a good job of leading the company into the future while improving their product lineup along the way
Tim is extremely well prepared. He’s giving neutral answers and that’s the best thing you gotta do to protect your company. Well done.
If he said anything against Trump, Trumps next tweet would sound something like that: "Lying Tim Cook is a total loser, a discgrace for the American people..."
We want to go forward, not backward. Upward, not forward. And always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom.
Tim is always reading from a prompter, go watch him live for once.
@@Marco-wz3ff 😂😂😂
demondojr
All hail Kang and Kodos!!
Damn he speaks like a true CEO
A butler for capitals
He’s just an accountant.
@@rafadydkiemmacha7543 Yeah and he "just"makes $12 millions a year.
The user dont want a $1k stand :) change pls
Stephen Wayda its business, look at cars that are purposely not suited to last 50 years, gaming consoles that are not adaptive to new gen games, same with phones and the list goes on. Get over it old timer
See. This man talks like a human with facial expression and emotion. Mark Zuckerberg does not.
zaidster111 That’s an assumption. As a public figure, he should take some public speaking courses.
True
Both are introvert, but this one is better.
K.
I am not an Apple consumer, but I was impressed with Tim Cook based on this interview.
His response with Trump is fake. He doesn't agree with Trump and he is not friends with Trump. He sugarcoated
Bacdi Tuong Of course he doesn’t like Trump. I bet he hates him because of the Trump’s disgusting policies. But he is a CEO, and has to be diplomatic because Apple is dependent on good relations with the government.
MVE Trump’s disgusting Politics? Like what specifically? Or are you one of those people who say things about Trump and then have no evidence to back up their statement?
Gianni Brown children in cages? religions blacklisted?
Gianni Brown trump supporter spotted
Mr. Cook did a great job avoiding to mention a specific company
Foxconn?
I’m glad Tim is at the helm. Keep it up.
iBen agreed that’s insanely high, but the customers for that monitor probably either won’t opt for that, or won’t bat an eye at $1k. Whoever actually needs that monitor will not really care how expensive it is.
My favorite CEO: Tim Apple 🍎
Great interview. Tim answers were balanced and realistic. Respect his views.
Apple is the only big tech company that is definitely not a monopoly, imo.
Do you even know what a monopoly is ? It cant be an opinion only a fact
JR Rodri The exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.
"the state's monopoly of radio and television broadcasting"
-So his opinion turned out to be a fact ;)
@@Jeger0 touche hahaha but I was referring to how he called apple the only non monopoly tech company
@@602liljr i think he was meaning the only tech company that you dont have to question whether its a monopoly or not.. not that it is the only non monopoly tech company
This is why I love Apple
Stephen Wayda actually that’s no longer the case after the court case....IOS 12 increased the speeds of older devices significantly - and IOS 13 is gonna make app launch times 2x faster and now updates of apps will take less storage.
maldita peppas I’m not a “sheep” frankly it’s very childish how we’re all calling people names just because people have different views about things....I’m no “sheep” to any company, I’ve criticised Apple in the past, but I’ve also stuck up for them, in this case I am, as I’ve legit just pointed 2 ways how they’re not slowing down older devices anymore....Also IOS devices have the longest support, way ahead of Samsung where after 2 years, you can no longer get the latest Android OS...
Sheep
@@dimsum2892 How old are you?
People on the internet explaining things
Random guys on the internet: sheep
Yea this is the internet now guys
Ima Apple customer and I’ll use the sign in with
I would also suggest that you also use autocorrect.
SMP wym? He used Ima on purpose, and using also twice to describe one thing is not technically correct. Maybe you should check yourself before you yell at others
@@dylanjames4706 true
MR YUP false
It works everywhere actually, not only on Apple devices. I just look at the API.
Wow! It is so refreshing to hear conversationalists taking turns.
dsthorp Right??
Tim nailed this interview.
Listening to him is great!
Tim...... you are my hero! It is my wish to meet you one day!
Great job Tim! This is why Apple is such a great company. Steve Jobs knew exactly what he was doing when he put you in charge of the ship. Keep doing a phenomenal job! I’ll never switch to any other product other than an Apple product. There’s no company like it!
competent companies that dont rip u off ? there's a few
This is WHY Apple is such a great company and makes great products, because it has such a great leader like Tim Apple. Now imagine the consequence of this country will have with our current president, sad!
"great products", the competitors have already caught up, this guy squandered the lead handed to him by Steve Jobs. Consequences? You do realize apple stuff used to be made in the US right. There are plenty of consequences for bad decisions. Now his guy peddles phones that are meant to fill land fills as they cannot be fixed, all the while hiding behind rainbow and green flags, pure hypocrisy is the truth of woke capital, sad indeed.
@@woooweee Sorry you believe all that...
Wooo, one of the more intelligent comments here.
@@malditapeppas509 Well simply stated thats why its a Pro product... And I challenge you to go compare that monitor against others in its range and then look look at their prices...
@@malditapeppas509 I'm not talking about the stand, nobody cares about that, don't even waste time on it... I'm talking about the monitor... And no, the people who wanted this are pros, new Macs will come soon like they literally always have... I'm not sure what Macs your thinking people want
You should have asked him why a stand would cost 999?
Skandar check out Jonathan Morrison’s video about it!
because it is a PRO product for PRO users, not for regular home users.
That wouldn't fit the topic of the interview anyway :) but yeah, that's an embarrassment to sell a stand for $999. No one would mind if a monitor with a stand cost $6999 instead of $5999 (it would still be worth the money) but selling a piece of aluminium for $999 just feels petty.
Im swiching to apple after this and i think its time to end whats app account.
You will break
Completely agree :D
After watching this I found a $999 charge on my debit card.
🤣
This woman is so mean to Tim.
"We're not waiting for the government to act"
that was the best interview ever. clear questions clear answers. Apple CEO Tim Cook is the best Tech Ceo out there in our generation. The Lady questioning Tim deserve a recognition for such a smart, straight honest questions.
Obafemi Adaraloye not even close. This was clearly a liberal interviewer trying once again to use another public figure to destroy Trump. I’m so over it
idk steve jobs was pretty good
See, you don't need the government to act on this. By means of competition, privacy is getting restored. No government would be able to do this. Thanks Apple!
@@kjr5034 Don't understand your point, if there is any.
It's not that Apple is benevolent and wants to create privacy, we all know that. They do it because it's a great business strategy, that's the point.
"It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own self-interest."
Users start concerning about privacy, so the most privacy focused company will have an advantage.
A design of genius, indeed, Capitalism.
Julian Benegas Damn right
Government can't do much especially in a timely manner and definitely not in an organized manner.
Tim is the man . 👏🏼
Not only for us citizens but everybody in the world. Everybody checked by these companies all over the world.
She's like a robot when she speak LOL! and from this interview I can see now that Tim Cook does know what he's talking about, I see why Steve picked him in 2011 as CEO.
AA WW this is what im going to say! Im wondering whos next, tim cook 100% to me than steve jobs
Tim Cook has my respect. But to be honest, I truly miss Steve Jobs. From Steve's mind came many of the products that we love today.
Church Channel now that we have the products we can always make them better without him. But what we cannot do is teach CEO’s Tim Cooks values.
That’s what apple need now. A CEO like Tim Cook with great values and high emotional intelligence
Please! It is not pronounced iPhone "XS;" it is "Ten S." Please stop saying the letter "X"
Well Fauxcahontas is never right about anything! Apple is fine. Tim Cook is one of the few liberals I can respect!
Tim Cook is an amazing human being
Maybe if he wasn't gay.
mrk107 stop trolling
I've moved away from Apple over the past few years but I think its about time to switch back
If we spend time online., how are companies going to pay attention to us as consumers without our data.? Is the Internet meant to be private.?..
It's meant to be anonymous, but not private.
huawei and apple have healthy level of respect. And ren said apple is his teacher...I think Huawei likes apple more than any US company does...
Tim Cook: I strongly disagree with that.
Me: I'm sure you do.
That was interesting. Thank you Tim Apple!
Proudly consumer of Apple!
u like green or red apples
What a decent and thoughtful person 👍🏼💕
00:33 Very nice office man!
We want to give our users more exclusive games, Apple TV+, Apple Card and “so much more” because we don’t care about people spending too much time on their phones, what matters in this life is money and our reputation. Thank you
Why should we care what's his opinion?!
Tim you make us very proud, what a great leader you are. That is another reason why I love Apple, very satisfied to be a customer.
Cook for President, 2020
Then go buy a $999 display stand.
@@wino0000006 Are you a pro user?
@@mryup6100
I always use state of the art devices.
@@wino0000006 Very nice sir.
Tim is very smart to avoid all the question
先生Elmo I don’t think he dodged any questions. It’s just that he doesn’t have answers for some forward-looking questions.
Don’t know he is honest or cool, but he is defenitely being diplomatic
I really hate the way the interviewing is done. It feels so unprofessional "so you're saying you're not a monopoly. But Elisabeth Waren says" - what kind of questioning is this supposed to be?
how much did CBS get for this Promo from Apple
Tim Cook is a great CEO and Apple is a great company.
Why this interview has became an interrogation,
She's trying to deliberately sabotage him. Asking him those questions about Facebook, WTH?
Got to love this guy.
With screen time I notice that I was spending WAY to much time on social media and I locked all them apps at different times witch only gave me a few hrs per day to spend on them apps so now I spend more time getting my work done and because the apps are locked I spend more time with my family
The premise of some of this woman’s questions are so poor. She is more focused on painting Trump in a bad light rather than focusing on the facts and real issues with these topics.
well privacy is a fundamental right but you have to pay 1000$ to have it. Nice move
Raghu Ariga u can also get a padlock for your haircut so it won’t look the same again.
APPLE is doing very well, something that makes me happy, thanks to Tim Cook and also in the past Steve, kind regards.
The only way to activate Apple's new privacy feature (Sign in With Apple) designed to limit app tracking on iPhones, is if you activate Face ID. Users who don't use Face ID on their Xs/Xs Max/Xr devices (or those who have disabled this security feature after using it) won't be able to use their (anonymized) Apple emails to sign into apps, because of the "mandatory" Face ID step. This doesn't make sense at all! Consumers should have full freedom of choice as to how they wish to secure their devices (or other key features on their devices). Apple more or less is forcing consumers to use Face ID to use key features like Apple Pay, etc (and now the app privacy feature to be rolled out in iOS 13). The funny thing is Apple has a 2nd layer for securing Face ID, which is the good ol' passcode (you actually can't access "Face ID & Passcode" in Settings without entering a passcode). So the question is - Why doesn't iOS 13 give us the option of using a passcode to use Sign in With Apple to limit app tracking (and even use Apple Pay, etc)?
Apple lacks an indepth understanding of privacy. To them it's a unique selling point (USP), especially that we are in the age of privacy. It's a strategy to be on the good side of history and Congress. But I don't think Apple understands the consumer freedom of choice that comes with privacy. Consumers should have options, don't just push a single solution at them in a " take it or leave it" manner - especially when it involves their biometrics and their faces. It's a matter of principle! Apple doesn't own the right to our faces or biometrics in the name of security (nor health). Regardless of how "secure or encrypted" this data is, Apple or anyone else have no right to what we own; we own our data, heart beat, thumb prints, and facial features. Apple says it believes "privacy is a human right," yet pushes Face ID on you like you have no say in it. This shows severe lack of understanding of consumer privacy on Apple's part.
And while we're at it, Apple does not allow you to delete the Health app. iPhones have sensors that will soon be able to detect if women have their periods (in iOS 13 & beyond). You can disable the Health app, but for some odd reason, you cannot uninstall it altogether.
Again, a tech company that truly respects consumers privacy would give them the leeway to uninstall the Health app and any native app that retains health & biometrics data.
I think you may have this slightly wrong regarding Apples new iOS 13 sign in with Apple. I’ve been reading Apples own press release and it states there that you can use Face ID or Touch ID to activate sign in.
@@juliebarker7025 There's no Touch ID on the new models Xs, Xs Max , and Xr. You only have one option and that is Face ID. Apple's press releases mention Touch ID to basically say older iPhones can use the security features they already have on them. Their website also says users can choose not to use Face ID, but doesn't say at what expense. Either way, Apple should give owners of new and old iPhones a second option that isn't based on their biometrics to activate Sign in With Apple. This option is passcodes.
Really great interview. Learnt a bit today about how to handle questions.
Great CEO. Steve Jobs was so right.
Privacy is the most valuable resource that all humans have equally. Everyone should fight for privacy. That is the fight for our lives.
Damn this guy knows his way with words!!
Go to school , and stay informed and you can speak similar to him .
wow..after a long time its so nice to listen to a true professional.. Steve Jobs sure chose a worthy successor..
When he says "I hope that doesn't happen?" Is he referring to poor sales of iPhone or high tariffs on iPhone?
Both
Tim.... I love you!
Why are they interviewing a business man and expecting the truth??? only the main stream media would think this is good content.
Great idea get rid of iTunes a total waste ! Now put in a feature to browse your backup data and be able to edit your backup before a restore ..been waiting for that common sense feature since day 1
Anybody think apple stock can go past 190?
Mr. Cook has a million dollar smile... trust me..
Such a great business leader who really respect people's free right and put the bullet where the call is, instead of being a hypocrite. Apple definitely can make much more money out of users data like Facebook/Instagram/Google are doing, but they did not.
Nonsense. Facebook is free, apple products are not. If they even tried to be like facebook, they'd lose their market in a day, they don't get credit for that, especially when they've been busy little censors, manipulating news feeds, gatekeeping based on politics in their closed ecosystem, their echo chamber which will become little more than an orwellian trap.All these companies are in their own way working towards a chinese internet, complete with social credit score, they are not to be defended. The more they build, the more aspects of life they begin to control, whether that be communications or financial transactions, the more dangerous they become as they have proven that they will leverage these powers to push their political bias.
He’s helped Apple so much
Unfortunately we can no longer buy iphones in europe because they are so expensive.
Even in the US it's expensive for what you're getting.
Ebay dude
She's really trying to get him to attack Facebook.
She's a feminist
Cook rehearses his interviews, he’s a good actor. What people should focus on is not what Cook says, it’s how apple is making its products which keep getting worse and people are under control over these companies. Apple needs another Steve Jobs. Not a Tim Cook.
Asking Tim Cook about immigration is like asking the average joe how to run Apple.
Tim Cook is the best CEO after Steve Jobs. He is really focused on Privacy. And that’s great. I support Apple. We want privacy. Say no to Google and Facebook. And Chinese Company like Oppo, Vivo, Oneplus, Xiaomi.
turn up the volume ffs
Great Interview
For the first time, there are all positive comments!
“Hey guys, do you guys want to have the interview over here where we have all the chairs and tables?”
“No it’s okay, we’ll just put 2 chairs here in the middle of the room where nothing is around us.”
Love me some Tim Cook
tim really cares about the people awesome
No CEO truly cares about the people, just think this what idiot will go up on an interview and say "I think the government is filled with idiot's and Trump should get removed from office " he's being a people pleaser
He had to be very careful when the Huawei q came up
''Huawei sucks, Apple is much better and that is all i am going to say for now''
@@rudy1999 that's how Steve Jobs would probably reply if he was still around 😀
Prior to this awesome occasion I want to look up the definition of rights in America with air tags and constitutional arms
What did Tim Cook said in 4:35?
What did Tim cook say , in 4:35 ? *** Learn how to construct a sentence.
Thanks Tim Apple.
Privacy is very reasonable thing to offer to users, but then again so is a cable of a $1200 phone that doesn't break 3 months after the purchase, or the keyboard of a $2000 laptop for that matter. And I'm writing this on a Macbook.
Talk about paying taxes!
If he is so good, why don't he lower his price
He’s so on point with the privacy thing. I mean google is dam near turning evil with all their meta data warehousing.
wow sorry if anybody else started chatting about future releases....
Not on the user side when it comes to price
Apple CEO Tim Cook: "We made the phone"
maximthefox they came up with the idea but they didn’t make it, the engineers made it
Apple just want all the credits when actually the engineers deserves the credit for making it
No privacy for criminals
Amazing leader
I prefer to use anything other than Apple just because of prices, but I think they did right by letting Tim lead Apple after Steve's death.
the cuestion should be is goberment to big
Cook is cool
True
Nice job Tim, i'm no fan of Apple but i like how he is profundly concertrating on privacy. Btw i always make sure when ever i'm using the net, i encrypt my paper trail because your ISP, trackers/advertisers and many foreign governments folow your everymove in the virtual world (internet) and can use your paper trail for misuse, abuse and threats.
If privacy becomes what everyone talks about , companies will tell you whatever you want to hear on this topic. Keep it in mind. Like Naomi Klein have pointed out long ago, every non-mianstream issue or core topic will be quickly adapted by marketing as a tool to make sales increase and to generate profit. All consumers should keep this in mind at all times. I'm not saying that companies being positively snobbish in this sense cannot sometimes bring in positive changes to society but at the end of the day it's mostly about company's profit margins and consumers should not lie to themselves that this is not the case and monitor companies activities anyway.
Whenever I see Tim cook
Anderson Cooper comes in my mind
The man that overseas sweatshops
Tim’s got a lot of flack since he took over from Jobs, even today. But what can I say, I like the guy. I think a lot of it is petty and unfounded and I think he’s done a good job with Apple since he took over. The ‘Apple don’t innovate anymore crowd’ is a bit obnoxious if you ask me. There’s only so much groundbreaking innovating you can with a smartphone. And with Apple Silicon on it’s way I think he’s done a good job of leading the company into the future while improving their product lineup along the way