Fascism and Mussolini | The 20th century | World history | Khan Academy
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ค. 2013
- Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing-and saving your progress-now: www.khanacademy.org/humanitie...
Created by Sal Khan.
Watch the next lesson: www.khanacademy.org/humanitie...
Missed the previous lesson? www.khanacademy.org/humanitie...
World history on Khan Academy: From the earliest civilizations to the modern world, geography, religion, trade, and politics have bound peoples and nations together - and torn them apart. Take a journey through time and space and discover the fascinating history behind the complex world we inhabit today.
About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
Subscribe to Khan Academy’s World History channel: / channel
Subscribe to Khan Academy: th-cam.com/users/subscription_...
wow no scary backround music and bias propaganda, thank you
the ideas where scary themselves lol
@@vasilisioannou5794 if you’re a communist, yes and you should be scared
@@N0n0b0dy ahh, so you’re a filthy fascist.
@@richjuin9504 an idea so powerful and right, that it took the whole international establishment to destroy it that the thought of it almost a century later makes you go under your bed and cry
@@N0n0b0dy man, someone’s edgy. Is this how you cope when your parents don’t pay any attention to you? Poor thing.
Economically there not right-wing, there third position. But socially they share many ideas with the right, mainly nationalism, conservatism and a general dislike of socialism, the welfare state, immigration and liberalism.
Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”-that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically.
Fascism does include the enforcement of traditionally “right wing“ ideas Like those you mentioned. However, some would argue that to mandate these ideas or “values” through codified law would actually be antithetical to right wing ideology because that would be government intervention. This would be the same people who consider libertarians right wing.
Andrés Descalzo you are describing communism, which is considered to be the alternate version of socialism
Will DeMarco marxist socialists are communists, as opposed to fascists
Hitler's party was socialist even though they disliked the communists
Very unbiased and surprisingly accurate explanation.
Thank you!
Nah. He still geys alot wrong like them being agaisnt socialist which is the name the bear.
UNBIASED? ACCURATE? I would call this video many things but definitely not those two words
@@kajlenck9445 It is accurate.
@@joeli.9991 your understanding of fascism is based on misconceptions about nazism which are 2 different ideologies. Just go and listen to the doctrine of fascism it is here free on youtube
@@kajlenck9445 You’re not really adding value by your vague comments. You’re also assuming that I don’t know what Nazism and Fascism are, which I find a bit bizarre since we haven’t even begun having a conversation. Nazism is a form of Fascism and one can argue that it’s an extreme form of Fascism. They have more commonalities than differences.
I believe the fasces represented the power of Roman officials to punish (the beating with rods) and execute (the axe). They were carried by representatives of Roman consuls and dictators who would care out those duties.
thank you so much for this video, its very simple, but it helped me understand the topic so much better (:
😊
So if the nazis had won, in the end, we would've seen a germany vs italy boss fight
not really, militarily Mussolini is not on the same level as Hitler at all. He will be beaten in a week
It’s not possible, but if it does, they’re just roleplaying their ancestors.
@@leronglin7077 That just shows how weak Mussolini's military was. Hitler went to war once and lost. lol
My dude. Hitler went to war twice and lost. First against the Allies and second against the Comintern. It’s not that they had a crappy military (they were actually pretty good) it’s that under the circumstances, they were going to lose, without a doubt. The Allies controlled most of the resources, they had the USA to carry them, and they had the actual capacity to fight two wars. Nazi Germany had the industrial capacity to probably fight one. When D-Day landed, they had to fight on two fronts, which spells doom if not danger to the industry and nation. Mussolini though was technically a PM, still “loyal” to the king. So anything they he did to restructure the government or the military would’ve been disliked by the king. In the end, the king did fire Mussolini because of the repeated military failures and the invasion of Italy.
@@tossapixeltoyournoelle
Even Mussolini in his last interview before his death said that it was either war along with Germany or war against Germany in case of neutrality
This is one of the most accurate accounts and explanations that I have come across so I want to give you kudos there. However, it is important to note that Mussolini wasn't a fan of Hitler's because he detested Hitler's Jewish racism and racism in general. Fascism had no intrinsic connection with Anti-Semitism in the way that national socialists did. Italy was more about Italians as a country coming together under fascism and having all the people being united under the Italian flag. Just like the way that you described when you gave us the actual meaning of what Fascism is. At first Mussolini didn't think like this because of his strong socialist ties, but he was convinced that nationalism wasn't a bad thing when people united together for a good cause to defeat enemies trying to destroy their county. Whereas the whole premise of National Socialism or Nazism was about getting rid of the Jews because they were responsible for all of Germany's ills and economical decay. The Jews were nothing other than the scapegoats and were blamed for being greedy using corrupt capitalism to get ahead. Many people don't realize that Mussolini had many close Jewish friends within the socialist party along with having a Jewish mistress. To Mussolini it was the connection and the love for country that brought the people together through nationalism. And for Hitler what brought the country together was the hatred of the Jews. To Mussolini's dissatisfaction he had to allow Anti- Semitism to be allowed after a period of time because he realized that Hitler would not accept anything less from an ally. But it was begrudgingly.
Anti-Semetism is merely an expression of the xenophobia and racism aspects of fascism.
Fascism isn’t inherently about a specific race, but of one race against all others.
It’s true that it doesn’t necessarily mean facists are racist homophobes. They just always happen to be racists and homophobes.
This is too generous for me, he wasn’t ideologically antisemitic from the beginning but I think he bought in later. Or that’s what I got from Stanley Paynes, A History of Fascism.
@@MrHastygamer How so?he saved italian jews.
Another Axis power, Japan, accepted Jewish refugees too. So fascism as an ideology isn’t inherently anti Semitic, but it’s followers tend to think otherwise
omg khanacademy i'm trying to entertain myself stop posting interesting educational videos cant keep away :( so good
This guys is an ignorant and I have no clue how a being with consciousness can call it anything but pathetic and ignorant
At the start "d'azione" is the contracted form of "di azione" which means "of action" so it could be called "the group of rivolutionary action"
Thank you for a well presented video.
Thanks a lot khan Academy 😊😊
Hi there,Very didatic video, good job. I suggest you put the historical moment of the facts. Will be more clear to understand. overall good job.thumbs up
our world is big and sufficient for everyones needs but dwarfs compared to human greed, even when we finally conquered this world and its entirety, at that very second, greed is born once again and far more destructive than the previous one...
Finally, a Khan Academy video I watch without being forced to
Hi Mr. Khan, thank you for all the good work you do. Would you please do a video about Helena Petrovna Blavatsky and the occult's influence on fascist ideology throughout history? Hitler kept a copy of Blavatsky's "The Secret Doctrine" on his night stand and her racial theories were a cornerstone of Nazi and American eugenics. A good book about this is "The Occult Roots of Nazism" by Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke. Thank you!
great suggestion.
Thanks for the references.
Christine Hawkins godrej
So apparently white Christians nationalist is just a pseudonym for pagan.
…thank you for the clarity.
Wow
you are so cool, and congrats for years of hard-working
"A bundle of things will be stronger together than individually"
"Apes alone weak. Apes together strong."- Caesar
@Max St. Arlyn you doubt the power of apes together?!
Really annoys me when people refer to Fascism as far right when in reality it goes against most if not all beliefs found on the right
Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”-that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it.
That primarily comes from fascism building on tradition and national mythos and elevation of the state. Any philosophy has the potential to authoritarian; but economic structures actually have nothing to do with it fascism.
@@andresd3104 sounds like the best system currently conceived
Not defending the ideology, but Nazism gives Italian fascism a bad reputation.
2:27 i don't know if i might be right or wrong bbut as far as the books i've read on the topic the sole purpose of the actionaries who wanted Italy to intervene in the war was regarding the fact that the war , would tire out both soldiers and workers and hopefully bring to a socialist revolution in italy , that was mussolini's thought for that matter when he was in the socialist party
Kay from Girls und Panzer.
Great video but I disagree about fascism neither being left or right. I think you're getting fascism confused with collective anarchy
Also wrong about communism.
fascism was fascism. period. it is the definition of 'right' and 'left' that changes in time and in countries
Wait 5:19 can be interpreted in two ways 1)that the wealth of the nation is there for the government to use or 2) wealth obtain through trade is there to improve the lives of everyone in the nation. So which one was it?
Both
You're a great teacher. Thank you for all your videos.
very sober analysis! great job!
Thank u so muuuuch!
This is Mussolini's version of facisism. The physosophy was laid by Giovanni Gentile, is not exactly the same
Well, Benito has founded fascism so his version is closer to reality.
@@BooguyTheAdept What no, Giovanni Gentile is known for founding fascism
@@ignisimber2818 you can think up an idea for an invention, but it isnt you who gets the credit; it is the inventor for he made it a reality.
@@Zqppy Mussolini put fascism into fruition but Gentile invented fascism and wrote the first book about it. Like Gentile made a "how to video" and Mussolini just followed it
@@ignisimber2818 Well, if we want to be MORE specific Gabriele D'annunzio was one of the first proto-fascists who directly influenced Mussolini's tactics and rhetoric.
The whole reason why Mussolini and his fascist ideology was "anti-socialist" was because he was directly competing against the socialists (Communists) for political control. What this video does not tell you is that Mussolini was raised and indoctrinated in Marxism and embraced it by working with multiple socialist propaganda newspapers. The ONLY reason why the fascist political party was "anti-socialist" was because it was simply politically expedient to do so since Mussolini was kicked out of his newspaper job.
Furthermore, Communist states do in fact take direct control over the economy (see every communist nation that has ever existed). Therefore, Fascism, whether you like it or not, lies directly next to Communism on the left of the political spectrum.
@Pack -A- Punch Did you not read what I said? And the video itself says that Fascism is NOT on the right because of their direct control of the economy. Historically, zero Communist countries were ever stateless.
@Pack -A- Punch According to you. but they in fact considered themselves communists.
@Pack -A- Punch That's the concept but the concept falls flat on it's face when practiced in reality. "Communism" as a philosophy, is utopian and impossible and impractical as history proves.
@Pack -A- Punch communism can't be achieved in practice because it goes against the human psyche. People do want they want and not what they need. It's called free will. This is why free markets work and communism leads to starvation.
Communist country is a oxymoron. And that's just a idiotic take. In facist countries worker unions were suppressed and corporations were given a lot of funding for the war effort. Those are extremely anti left wing. I think when you say communism you mean socialism. But even then Socialism isn't just when a government has control over the economy. Socialism is when the workers own the mean of production. Which didnt happen especially since forced labor was utilized by facist countries.
Thank you.
So nice to hear someone make the distinction that fascism is not left or right wing. The actual core tenets are forcible silence of opposition and regimentation of society.
according to historical fascist documents, more of their policies and actions align with right wing conservatives and reactionaries.
It took ideas from both the left and right to make a form of right-wing populism. Fascism was an attempt to make right-wing politics appeal to the masses. It's pretty much the template for current right-wing populist parties...
I like these Videos! Keep em' up!
Pretty fair examination
misgana Khan for expounding on this topic; it's the other half of the story that historians have nel
- "I do not admit that great injustice was performed with respect to the Red Indians of America or black Aboriginal Australia" - said one well-known figure of Europe. And explained, "I do not admit that injustice was performed with respect to these people because stronger race, "I do not recognize that the great injustice was committed against the red Indians of America or the black aborigines of Australia," said one prominent European figure. And he explained: "I do not recognize that injustice was committed against these people because a stronger race, a cleaner race, a more wise race ... came and took their place." End quote. Do you know who said that?
- Hitler?
- No. Churchill. Hitler had a good education with the English, only now he let them down at the last minute, for which they were angry with him.
They both sucked my man
One has yo explore the Italian Sociologist Gaetano Mosca and also the origins of French fascism !
I miss him so much bros
Long live
Based
Viva la Duce!
DUDE, I had an exam on this a week ago today! Why couldn't you have posted it then? :'(
That's quite an impressive photo of Mussolini. I'm shocked I've not seen it before. Does it make the rounds common ?
Alaka zabardast explanation dy dera manana kuma
Fascism is/was opposed to capitalism. Mussolini called it the Third Way.
Good research...
There were a few things I disagreed with in this video, but one in particular. Extreme right is anarchy, or no government, not free market/small government. The US was built on the idea of limited representative government (people's law), which I consider to be somewhere close to the middle between anarchy (no law) and tyranny (ruler's law). See the 5000 Year Leap, chapter 1 or the textbook "The Making of America" by Cleon Skousen.
Stop trying to make absolutist arguments, based solely on American centric terms of reference. If we were to accept these ridiculous homilies, it would be impossible to believe that the internal threat currently facing the United States was coming from the right. Whether it’s Fascist or not, it’s right wing authoritarianism by any measure. No wonder people don’t learn from history.
I think you identified small government with the right, and of course the libertarians are over on that side. Just a small point: Small or non-existent government advocacy has also got a strong presence on the left in anarchism or anarcho-syndicalism. The belief, and there s a great deal to be said for this, is that government’s role by and large has been to protect the powerful.
Yeah, of course. I should also say that one of the bigger reasons Socialists will often advocate for a bigger government is so it can help aid people before beginning the full transition towards a stateless, communist society. It kind of helps to be able to help people in an organized fashion effectively.
@Bob Watters Um, yeah. One way to characterize the difference is this. Those on the right tend to want the state to stop regulating corporations. Those on te left want the state to stop subsidizing corporations. When I say “the right,” I’m thinking Richard Epstein, not so much Bob Nozick who even in his libertarian days conceded that we have a welfare state for corporations-limited liability for corporations, for example. Negligence liability in torts.
@Bob Watters I fail to see how the US left is more authoritarian than the US right. They're both quite authoritarian obviously but the left less so.
@Bob Watters OK, Bob, thanks for clearing that up for me.
Small government being on the right is just the rights attempt to rebrand itself. Historically the right sides with large non democratic governments like monarchies and theocracies, where fascism fits in perfectly.
With all respect, I think you make an error in your interpretation of right vs left, which is probably influenced by the US political experience. Right does not stand for free market, in fact free market originally was a leftist concept. Basically Fascism is on the right extreme and Liberalism in the left, of which Classical Liberalism is more center and Socialism on the left extreme. Socialism, originally, was a radical form of Liberalism which gradually became authoritarian, but was initially libertarian. The way to understand left vs right is to think of the political situation after the French Revolution. Where the conservatives were sitting on the seats on the right side and the progressives on the seats on the left side within the Assemblee General, which was the first democratic government of France. Conservative meant being lenient to the 'ancien regime', which meant: authoritarian, clerical, statist, controlled economy, where nobility had the power, while the progressives wanted to liberate, overturn tradition and give voice to the bourgeoisie, who wanted a market free from interference like taxes etc: the citizens, tradesmen etc.. The reason why the left became authoritarian is obviously because it is in people's nature to want power, and they leaned on governance to realize their ideological ideals, so they are basically the corrupted form of their utopian libertarian selves of the 19th century,
@pegasos arete: Fascism was a form of totalitarian socialism, founded by two socialists and born out of marxism. Therefore, far left.
@@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.
You again?
Read the Communist Manifesto and Doctrine of Fascism; the two are opposed to each other.
@@montithered4741 : F as cis m (and nati on al so cial is m) opposed m arxi sm, yes. Nobody is denying that.
I learned the term fascism is related to the idea that a bundle is much more stronger than a single stick alone. So fascism means group or unity. You can easily break a single stick but it is almost impossible to break a big bundle of sticks hardly tied together.
I agree, for example in Britain the BNP achieve most success in Labour constituency as it comes from the same logic of wanting government to socially engineer society in their own vision.
And the left have employed this threw scams like climate action and blm,in some cases antifa have attempted to murder political opponents.
@@Sandwich13455 Political violence is not fascism moron, were the founding fathers fascist because they used political violence to break free from the british? Unless your superwoke then no! You clearly haven't watched the video
The government giving welfare to people is the same thing as exterminating minorities according to you
@@Sandwich13455And yet it will be the left who will be the first targets of murder and it will be done with the cooperation of conservatives. Think I’m kidding? Look at the lessons of history. That’s how Hitler got there. That’s how Mussolini got there. That’s how Franco got there.
And they did it by creating the illusion that left wing groups (AntiFa and BLM are modern analogues) are a threat to be destroyed.
You’ve swallowed the fascist line very well.
Well said.
The attempt to associate political ideology with "government size" is somewhat ignorant. Like the original fascists, right-wingers wanted a strong government to enforce law and order , protect private property , crush labor unrest , and maintain the social and economic hierarchy and protect the nation against socialist and communist uprisings. Many on the right-wing in Italy and Germany wanted to overthrow the liberal order , destroy democracy and reinstall monarchy or some type of authoritarian government. Fascists always collaborate with establishment right-wing conservatives to overthrow democracy and set up an authoritarian state when a left-wing takeover seems eminent. A good book on this is Martin Blinkhorn's "Fascists and Conservatives: The Radical Right and the Establishment in Twentieth Century Europe".
What is strength? Diversity or unity?
God, this comment section is weird
its creepy but amazing. Khan Academy seems to follow my lesson plan at school (of course i know they don't really), whenever we start learning about something Khan uploads a video about it, its awesome
Okay,pendekkan... Leaders selalunya nak dengar cepat tangkas dan tepat.
Wrap it up,pack it up...
I'm watching this cos I have a history exam in like 2 days
Absolutely!
“Without God all things are permitted.”
― Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Nothing is true, everything is permitted.
- the brotherhood
ultragarrison
“bruh”
-The Hood
Uhh, the Italian fascists were catholic...
Hitler was christian.
@@tag.1835 uh. No
Fascism actually started with Emperor Constantine of the Roman Empire
@Sam Houston Please tell me that's sarcasm.
Plato's Republic resembled Gentile's original conception.
Ah yes,forced 'State Religion.'
Fasicism is a complex ideology .Facism is Authoritarian and promotes nationalism at all cost , Fasicsm is commonly associated with German Nazi and Italian regime that came after world war 1 Benito Mussolini in Italy , and Francisco Fanco in Spain and Juan Paron in Argentina were well known facist leader in the 20 th centuary Fasicism is a form of political practice distinctive to the 20th centuary Fasict movement are perhaps of little consequences now . It promises almost everything from extreme radicalism in 1919 to extreme conservatism in 1922 Fasicm is definetly revolutionary and dynamic .. Fasicm require some basic allegiancies such as to the nation national grandeur and to the master race or group and Fascist aim to use the country asset to increae the county strength ,the economic of fascism are complicated Fasicm is a extreme nationalism in neither Right Nor Left are to broad to be useful Fasicm can be difficult to define all fasict movements share some core belief and actions
Ulysses The Wasteland Mrs Dalloway was 1932
It just depends on how you view the left right spectrum. If you think it's values of government then it's on the left, but if you think it's how resources are distributed, then it's on the right.
Get it? I just hope it helps clear things up and allows you to see views from the other side :D
Bro in terms of values of government it’s just about as far right you can get
Rubbish.
@@tommygannett3217Wrong.
@@tommygannett3217"Foolish and reactionary and Conservative contraband practices must not be carried on under the Fascista flag… We are the first to recognize that a State law should grant the eight-hour day, and that there should be social legislation corresponding to the exigencies of the new times."
-"How Fascismo was Created” Mussolini speech (3 April 1921) delivered at the Teatro Comunale of Bologna
I was at my friend's place last night and he brang a Scandalli Accordion which suppose to be Mussolinis' . And I was wondering if it could have any value?
You have that????
@@spiko-ou3bp not me personally
NO IT'S WORKING JUST FINE
You are wrong about Mussolini’s motive for expansion and conquest. He did not mount campaigns in Africa because he thought Italians were racially superior but to secure economical advantages. Having colonies to tax was a “business move” to refurbish the country’s coffers, depleted by an indifferent and incompetent king, and modeled after the English empire which, at the time, still had many colonies and influence through the world.
But Mussolini’s foreign campaigns were not enthusiastically embraced by the people, they had to be “sold” to them through a systematic nationalistic propaganda that evoked the greatness and power of Ancient Rome, Mussolini in fact named his government “The Fourth Republic.”
Italy also needed a kind of second “renaissance” after years of mistreatment form European neighbors, particularly France and England who “stiffed” her during WWI peace accords with defeated Germany.
The idea of racial superiority was not Mussolini’s but eventually he went along with it because of his allegiance with Hitler.
It is important to note, when attempting to make sense of the reasons how Nazism and Fascism took hold in Europe, the political and socio-economic situation of the time in each country and what motivated people to go along. In Italy’s case only 50 years prior to Mussolini’s rise, the forced unification of the country, by the Savoia crown that pillaged and robbed the south of all its wealth, plunged the nation in to great economical disparity and discontent. That, and an obstinate monarchy that refused to modernize and give concessions, gave way for communist ideology to take hold and spread like wildfire. “Reazionari” communist began to create havoc with continued strikes and violent revolts, but the king was too afraid and too incompetent to know how to handle the situation leaving room for other groups to organize and seize his power.
@Humanity Galatica acc Giovanni gentile’s idealism and his formulation of fascism aren’t based on logical deductibility. Actual idealism does not entail a fascist ideology in any rigorous sense.
@Humanity Galatica gentiles idealism literally had no logical deductibility that led to fascism. It’s just an insecure ideology that allows people to cling on to a flimsy sense of identity at the cost of atrocity, no wonder it only pops up at times of disarray & general economic insecurity. People feel overwhelmed and need something to follow, quite sad really.
@Humanity Galatica quite the contrary, I base it on the multitude of critiques levied onto Giovanni gentile.
Thank.you
You’re welcome guys.
like Mussolini, IM A CULT OF PERSONALITY!
A legend in your own mind. ;-)
हर देश के लोगों की एक आंतरिक खासियत होती हैं। और जब संकट या दबाव आता हैं वह अपनी भूमिका दिखाती हैं। 1914के विश़्व युद़्ध में इटली पहले ट्रिपल एंलाईस में था पर जैसे ही युद़्ध आरंभ हुआ वह ट्रिपल एंता में चला गया जिससे वर्साय की संधि में उसे ना के बराबर भागीदारी मिली। यानि दोगला!
0:53 interesting... what's another word for a bundle of sticks?
Haha funny homophobia
When
For a long time i thought fascism was all about fashion 😂
XD
Hitler never called italians a mongrol race. Hitler liked italians and admired italian renaissance art as well as ancient rome.
A video with one image up the entire time is not a video.
But, if everything is for the state, and your individual rights subordinate to the government or state, and the state is the organism controlling its citizen's wealth (I imagine towards a greater military force)... Isn't that a closer definition of communism rather than capitalism or free-market?
Iggy Mc simple answer: no.
A very crude attempt:
* Fascists favor strength and unity: legionnaire.
* Capitalists favor individuals and freedom: rockstar.
* Communists favor equality and social justice: hippie.
"I do disagree with what you labeled the extreme left and right..." Do you guys have political science sources? Political scientists don't define the left-right line in terms of "economic freedom," they define more in terms of power and other interests (as shown below). (And by the definition below, the gold standard is highly reactionary!). So it does make some sense, but if you want a distorted version of political science, the left-right line, I'm sure you could find it.
successfulbuild actually left right is economic up down is authoritarian vs liberalism
Thank you so much. I hate the bais. I want to actually learn without an opinion effecting the content or perspective at which we view the content.
Corporatism is the economic policy
Hi
were would that be?
don't forget one thing who went to war on the side of the Germans and Italians, not Mussolini and Hitler but the people ... the same one who waved the flag to Mussolini was later hanged and the same "poor Germans" who lived in East Germany were supported Hitler
Storm Troopers...;)
@Long live Old Europe That's where George Lucas got the name for storm troopers: Hitler's nazi patrols.
Interestingly, this rather simple concept, along with the impact it had on the world in the 20th Century, is generally ignored in American public schools. Anyone wondering why that is?
*OY VEY!!!!!! ANTI-SEMITE!!!!!! ANTIIII-SEEEMIIIIIIITE!!!!!!!!!*
SHUT IT DOWN!!!!
@@squidvis Wow unsuprising the guy with the super straight pfp is a fascist sympathiser
It’s too powerful and would break the weak’s grasp on our glorious nation
@@deocrathow fragile is your masculinity if someone being themselves and harming no one annoys you
Do you have your sources for the content?
Is that bald guy Einstein on the right side?
4:22 should be Anarchism
That's even less accurate than what was stated in the video. Anarchy has never been considered right-wing. Right-wing politics has always been about hierarchy - the antithesis of anarchy. This is another American bastardisation of political theory.
As bad as mussolini was he was a saint compare to the monsters like Joseph Stalin and Hitler and mao pol pot and Castro
At the big statue of Lincoln in D.C., the tyrant rest his hands of fasces (the bumble of stick symbol of fascism). In fact, fasces are omnipresent in the US iconography.
Yeah, in relation to the Roman Republic. It was adopted by the Americans a century before Mussolini was born.
What? 😂
Also important parts of fascist ideology were extreme anti-egalitarianism (of a physical Darwinist sense), social conservatism and a cult of racial hygiene through the elimination of degenerency.
based
@@blank4227shut up Kyle, your 13. Do your homework
Wrong. Read the doctrine of fascism.
@@blank4227chud
"I refuse to qualify as right-wing my culture to which my revolution gave birth.... Fascist culture, which recovers values of the entire Italian twentieth century, is not right-wing. The movement of the anti-liberal voice in the marrow and in the polemic expressionism revives in the universal motto of Berto Ricci. The union culture headed by my friend Ugo Spirito is not right-wing. The culture of the Tuscan poets who extol the enigma to which they give no solution, everything can be, but not right-wing."
-Benito Mussolini
"Foolish and reactionary and Conservative contraband practices must not be carried on under the Fascista flag… We are the first to recognize that a State law should grant the eight-hour day, and that there should be social legislation corresponding to the exigencies of the new times."
-"How Fascismo was Created” Mussolini speech (3 April 1921) delivered at the Teatro Comunale of Bologna
This idea of "right-wing" as being about absolute free market and minimal or no government is ahistorical. Conservatives during the time of the enlightenment were pro-aristocracy, pro-monarchy, pro-tax(which went to the aforementioned) and opposed the liberals, who were all about laissez faire trade and minimal taxation. Right-wing politics is generally about maintaining existing hierarchies or, in the case of fascism, establishing a new one when the old one seems to be weak. Fascism is on the far right wing because it is absolutist in its hierarchical nature.
Not a bad video but he has one big error in it. He says that the fascists align themselves with free market people which is completely wrong. He says himself in the video that fascism is for complete control by the state over the economy. That's the opposite of free market. Fascism is very close to the other forms of Marxism which want complete State control over the economy. Fascism branched off of socialism because it is a form of socialism.
Vladimir Lenin said that the goal of socialism is communism.
History showed that socialism and communism eventually lead to fascism like we see in China today.
Based ideology
lol
Yep, child labor def is based.
neglected to speak on.
Fascism is used to describe ccp or communism.
no
Merriam-Webster s:
"fas·cism | \ ˈfa-ˌshi-zəm also ˈfa-ˌsi- \
Definition of fascism
1often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
early instances of army fascism and brutality
- J. W. Aldridge"
It's wrong.
@@PNF1922 Mangia merda, fascista.
My family fled Italy and Mussolini. They came to the USA with nothing and lived in poverty but they worked hard, saved hard, and started their own businesses, and are the product of the American dream. Let us never forget Democracy and the Constitution is to be protected and cherished at all costs.
Congratulations to your parents! It's nice to know some people do make it, even for those who were new to this country.
I hope I'm not being rude when I ask this but what do your parents think about the recent rise of far-right groups in the US these past few years? Sometimes it can feel like history is doomed to repeat itself.
@Humanity Galatica Democracy is a false god. Humanity was made to be dominated, not free.
@Humanity Galatica How about explaining hin why the People have no power instead of just stating the fact? 😂
It's called the American dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.
im hans
His inspiration the Ancient Roman Empire, his goal is to excavate the remaining Empire and he Found two largest ships in the nearby lake but unfortunately it all came in ashes during world war. To exhibit in the large museum in Italy. His profession during his youth is journalist.
I'd more say fortunately, maybe unfortunate for him!
@@ProfessionalBadPerson Mussolini was based (and red pilled) pre 1935 it was Hitler that was evil
@@tommygannett3217 Ah yes very based losing wars catastrophically and ethnically cleansing Libyans. Fascists always lose
I don't think that Mussolini or Hitler liked parliamentary idealists.
So the term fascism essentially means "strength in unity"
@You tube Censorship a bit like service to others, or service to your country, being valued more than personal desires etc.
@You tube Censorship BTW I'm not a fascist, I'm still learning about these things.
@@bilboblaggins7659 Even if you were, a lot of people have good reasons for being fascists (or right-wing populists in the 21st century).
@@vivianshepard1536 Since when did being a populist mean you’re a fascist?
AMAZING HOW SOME PEOPLE CAN BE VERY ADVANCED IN SOME AREAS LIKE CLOTHES OR COMPUTERS BUT HAVE AN MSNBC CONSCIOUSNESS ABOUT THE ROLES OF GOVERNMENT.
The goal of Khan academy, I think, is to present mainstream scholarship in a way that people can understand it. If he used your New World Order "textbooks" and so on, nobody would take him seriously. He'd also be going against the dictionary definition of fascism: "A philosophy or system of government that advocates or exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with an ideology of belligerent nationalism."
Your understanding of communism makes me think you don't know what you're talking about, I believe you're mistaking the historical record of what countries tried to achieve communism with the actual belief and political theory of communism. while you may be a great history teacher I think your perspective is limited i would encourage you to look into both communism(to learn it) and fascism (to eliminate it).
Mussolini had the Jews corralled and shipped to Germany.
In regions where the majority was a minority nationally, Mussolini shipped colonists to make those regions Italian.
Mussolini thought of Africans as eventual slaves, and he conquered Libya, Erythrea, and Somalia, and tried to conquer Ethiopia.
@You tube Censorship don't ever talk to me again.
So true!
If he thought of the people of the colonies as slaves, why did he abolish slavery in the colonies? You're either dumb or knowingly spreading misinformation
I wonder what Benito and Adolf would have thought of the European Union :/
Kumbaya my lord