Lawyers Losing Independence To Speak About Law A Serious Issue' : Senior Advocate Aditya Sondhi
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.พ. 2023
- Lawyers Losing Independence To Speak About Law A Serious Issue' : Senior Advocate Aditya Sondhi
LiveLaw brings you the latest legal news and updates from India and beyond.
We are into fact based legal journalism.
Endeavour of LiveLaw is to play an active role for a transparent and democratic legal ecosystem, in the larger public interest.
This video is an intellectual property belonging to LiveLaw Media Pvt Ltd. Any unauthorised usage of this video/script in any format is prohibited and will be subject to prosecution.
Stay updated. Subscribe to our channel bit.ly/2pskgB3
Support Us: bit.ly/35qFj6A
Visit Our Website: www.livelaw.in/
hindi.livelaw.in
Facebook: / livelawindia
/ livelawhindi
Twitter: / livelawindia
/ livelawh
Instagram: / livelaw.in
/ livelawhindi
Linkedin: / livelaw
/ livelaw-hindi
Live Law app is India's fastest legal news app that will keep you updated on the latest law/legal news from India and across the world. Download now.
Android: bit.ly/2toaimp
iOS: apple.co/39dQ0vh
Thanks to Live Law for bringing out so many insightful precious ideas to the public discussion
Judges must have courage to encourage truth and law abiding lawyers
Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or house hold divided against itself will not stand. If Saturn drives out Saturn, he is divided against himself. How then can his kingdom stand.
Law can't be what a lawyer/lawyers feel about. Judiciary lost its respect by it's interpretation of a written law meaning to the contrary and penchant to stray into executive domain. In a democracy courts are independent but not sovereign. It's must stay at the domain of adjudication of disputes.
Lawyers are fully independent till date. But hooligan and fun of law and twisting of law for self motives must be curtailed.
Please share more examples as well when lawyers were curtailed. This will be insightful.
Correct and good topic and need of hour.
Great talk Mr. Sondhi. Very informative. On straight on. !
Indian judiciary lost its moorings when transgressed primary decency it required in interpretation of wordings of Constitution. When asked point blank, many judges squirm on their seats, that by which stretch of imagination you can take a consultation as a unilateral veto?
Did we have these type of discussions before 2014! Unfortunately we are in that state
The situation at that time was not vulnerable as it is today.
Because then situation has not deteriorated this much beyond 2014 👍
We are blessed relation of Desh BandhuChittaranjanDas
Amazing man,dr sondhi
Common people concern is about getting timely justice, if judiciary not fit to be fulfill the expectation of common people then it would be considered failed judicial system and if collegium is part of the system for appointment of judges, then it's also a failed system.
Reform in judicial system is inevitable.
Sir golden words that petitioner wants after all relief high regards fm retd lecturer kalburgi karnataka
Human rights protection is very important. Advocates rally in each city is required to create legal awareness in the public.
If this is the case with learneded advocates, what will be the plight of ordinary people?
Proud of you .
District judiciary is in very deep sleep in disposable of divorce cases. The both male & female are running years together behind family courts.
Last few of CJI have been mute spectators to what’s happening in country, we see a flicker of hope in CJI Chandrachud who looks to take on head on for what is right - hopefully things will change over time and judiciary will again be known for independence
👍
Very.very.thanks
Country must has lost a most intelligent Judge.
Late SRDAS
(Daagupta)
Mentioned
In
His
Book
And
In
My
Biography
I have
Enclosed
Five chapter
1956-1961
And
Then
Ex vice chancellor of Viswa Bharati Santiniketan
And
SRDAS
Was
Very closed
Associate
Of
Rabindra nath Tagore
Nobel laureate
In
Literature
I agree ..it was nice to see all great people...I support collegium system..
I oppose collegium & entire Sr designation of Advocates system. Both must be abolished
There is need of separate website to receive human rights violation incident.
For a single line of Constitution argued in a division bench of madras high court, 10lacks cost imposed later withdrawn, this is the attitude of judges in mhc
"Bar becomes pliant"
Supreme court directions in case of arrest are there.still violations of directions are going on some where and someone. There is need of specific website to receive such incidents by complaints in writings and videos.
Awareness of 30 international human rights , which are declared by united nations in the year of 1948 , is most important
Very thoughtful insight. Appreciate it.
great insight into the situation
Grateful to Advocate Sondhi for highlighting these perils. Hope the relevant members of the judiciary act.
Independence of judiciary from executive is correct and two independent wings of judiciary is bar and bench but it's not so, the wing of collegium is wanted to independent from bar is incorrect
Justice by law is the last straw/resort for common man - today it’s independence is questionable - how judges hold their value systems and avoid political leanings either by self or under pressure/carrot by executive
????!
Now all most of all have mobiles .All human rights violations incidents are to be received in website and website should be known to every one.There is need of separate website to receive human rights violations incident.
Appointment of judges should only in collègium methodology .political involvement should only that of a watchdog .a subject expert only can select a good quality judiciary not any body else .
Comprehensive Judicial Reforms. When is this happening? The same story is continuing since 1947. Modern India, a modern World, need World Class judiciary. But most lawyers themselves don't want this change. Why?
Delhi Durbar cannot rule at one stroke. We must go like a system similar to that of European Union so that judiciary will have many windows to breathe in.
I don't understand what Aditya is suggesting that the govt should not have a say in the appointments? Is that process part of constitution?
Central government has to bring website to receive complaints and videos in respect of human rights violations incidents happened any where in India .Then there would be first step from the government side for protection of human rights. Human rights protection is continue process .if rights are books in existence that is in constitution ,can not be taken as a protection shield unless these rights are protected in continuing way at least by registering the violations in specific website. Prompt action is required with in short time after registration in the website.
In many cases , it is observed by people that some police or official may not follow supreme guide lines, unless the concerned person's are imprisoned ,who violate directions of supreme Court and concerned persons do , illegal arrests and filing charge sheets with irrelevant sections may continue, in future also,without break
can any one tell how much LAWYERS charge CLIENTs for
appearing inSC
transparency truth fact FINALLY
TRUTH can come out
will JUDGES talk about it
Appointment of district judges requires political influence and money in lakhs and crores
Not upto the expectation level. Just a lobby of few mischievous.
First remove the paribarbat in judiciary system.
All insights are very thought provoking but moot point is how do we make sure judiciary is kept independent and is not pressured /influenced by executive and throwing carrots for quid pro quo arrangements- recent judgements have seen the result of this - look up to justice Chandrachud to hit it hard and ensure independent judiciary
Excuse me, being a common man, I feel some sort of things are missing, not gradually, but very fast, which, in turn,makes a damagingeffect ontheminds and losing trust and confidence.
Sudhamoy Rakhit also
Has
Death sentence order
What event is this?
Why Respected u u lalit sir not resigned from his post if he feel so.
Why does this speaker say that the
CAA act would have not passed the Constitution? The CAA was only for those religious minorities ot three countries which declared themselves as Islamic and if these minorities (Hindus,Sikhs and xtians) sought refuge in India to escape persecution. This Act was not for existing citizens of India.
Which one of the two eyes is so important ? Which is more important mind or heart ? That is head or body.
Judges appointment by the executive since 2014.
...
Yes
Suresh Das and Abhishek Das
Has
Death sentence order
From
Chief justice of India
Respected and Honble
Justice
Dychandrachur
Connivance is the bottomline.
In our legislation, if Supreme court violate constitution, do not respect democracy and impose poisonous ego on Public, leading anarchy and responsible for jungle Raj
Elevation is also from .. officers.....who rarely speak ....
Nonsense. Corrupt judicial system in India must be purified at all costs
VOX POPULI - VOX DEI 👍 Voice of the people is the voice of God!
As a practising advocate, I would say that a person should join the bar to become a lawyer and nothing more. No profession offers the kind of independence which legal profession offers. If one is chosen as a judge, it is a bonus. But, if a person joins the bar treating it as a stepping stone for becoming a HC judge, then the problems arise. HC Judges are appointed after consulting the governor of the State, which means the consent of the Chief Minister. I am rather surprised that Mr.Sondhi didn't show awareness of this essentil process of appointment of HC judges. Besides, caste and regional representation in the Court also plays a role. So it is not just the intellectual leaning of the lawyer which counts. There are other factors. So, Mr.Sondhi need not feel like a martyr!
Hindu rashtra, Khalsa, South India,.... country may split 🙄😲😭
*Judiciary has lost spine to stand up against saffron right wing political forces in India*
Judiciary filled with jokers due to nepotism.
British illegal rulers came to India and declared themselves as a Government. In 1861,with evil intention framed as criminal laws in guise of just to punish the crime committed persons but that British illegal rulers are also criminals because any one cry against British man ,he would be given death penalty that is 124 a indian penal code .They violated human rights and looted all sources but they left weapons in the guise of laws.constitution came with human rights but those weapons are hitting some one this is nothing misuse of law. Those criminal laws are to be studied and maximum amendments are to be made to save democracy and constitutional principles
*Judiciary is Apolitical is Joke *
Selection of judges should be prohibited having a political law officers or the law officers must be appointed by court itself not by ruling party
Law means nothing but
Drama
There is need public rally in each city with supreme Court judgments given on importantl sections in indian penal code and police act and criminal procedure code
So that misuse of sections can be reduced. Misuse of law is being done by official on their own and due to pressure from political power.
First remove collegeum system
Absolutely agreed with Adv Sondhi. Young lawyers are afraid of being able to express themselves
Urban naxals
Who are you ?
He is a secular pig..
Your two words aptly describe you....Andh bhakt.
@@kvsrao4249 You are bhadwa namaazi
According to Mr Sondhi the bar is the conscience keeper of the nation as though it is full of upright fair and non aligned persons. I believe that the lawyers are as fallible and partisan as the common man. In no country including democratic countries are judges appointed by judges. The executive does so and the democracy in those countries is thriving. The government has an ideology and its plans and programmes are implemented by legislation and administration. If a politically driven judge opposing the government is to adjudicate most likely he will impede the government’s plans and programmes. It is human nature. The outburst of judges in the Nupur Sharma case is a case in point. They made absolutely unwarranted unsubstantiated and highly offensive observations just because they were politically aligned. In each and every case where the state is involved the judgement is based on the political proclivity of the concerned judges. We cannot separate personal prejudices from the person.
It’s a rant.
First remove collegeum system