You called? Are you Insane?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ต.ค. 2024
- If you want to submit to be on the call-in show read instructions for submission here: crushlivepoker....
You can also use the coupon code YTA400 at check out for the first 30 days for free at the CrushLivePoker website.
Music credits:
------------------------------
I Dunno by Grapes ccmixter.org/fi...
Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported- CC BY 3.0
Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/i-dunno...
Music promoted by Audio Library • I Dunno - Grapes (No C...
------------------------------
Give us a thumbs up if you like the new title sequence and animated graphics!
Love it.
Bart, if played your way and you 3-bet it on the flop, villain calls, turn goes check-check, how do you play the river?
Call a small bet, fold to a jam? Folding to a jam seems exploitable unless you sometimes check back the ace of clubs on turn.
Can you move the Pot dollar sign to the left? Looks like a 5 at a distance.
I'm 41yr old, this new into is fire.
Props for the improvements.
Visuals are awesome and just added this song to my playlist. Love dancing to it! Thanks Bart!
Villain knew he would bet the river. Love the way he played it.
SLICK new graphics! Been stepping up the edit game, I appreciate it
As a plo player, its my daily bread to flop a flush and be disappointed
This is why I don’t play plo lol
Two cards is enough gamboroo for me
Classic.. My daily bread 🥖 !! Love it..
I also play PLO and know the pain -
Congratulations
Hero’s large bet sizes on the turn and river were his undoing. It made him feel he was committed whilst also setting villain up nicely for the jam and telegraphing his hand.
Also making it increasingly difficult for his opponent to pay him off with worse.
"Hero’s large bet sizes on the turn and river were his undoing" I kind of disagree. Due to the large bet sizes he could and should have easily folded the river. Had hero bet only 100 on the river ( and then villain pushes) hero could level himself into calling whereas now he knows (or should know) that he is beat!
You know who check-raise bluffs the river, especially at the lower stakes? Damn near almost nobody does, that's who!
if they’re fishy enough, they have the Jc & don’t think they’re bluffing.
I play live microstakes home games with my boys every week. I’ve seen some shit.
@@ts4gv unless your home game players are casino regulars, then it's not the same !
@@whataloadofbollox yes, & that’s exactly my point
@@ts4gv 🤣 "I've seen some shit".. 😂
Why would you check raise bluff the river in a low stakes game? Everyone checks back their thin value hands so when you do face a river bet, half the time it's the stone nuts and you'll get snap called, and the other half the time, he's bluffing you, so you would only need to check raise bluff to get him off king high when you have jack high. But if that's your plan, better to bet yourself since there's no guarantee he's going to bluff you with the best hand.
Hey Bart, I'm one of the PokerNews reporters who covered the WSOP $10k Omaha 8 event you were in. I'm a big fan of the channel and it was really cool getting to see you play. Good luck in the series!
Lol I love how candid Bart is during these hand reviews. Calls it exactly how he sees it, just as you'd hope any coach would.
Excellent insight into what players do and don’t do in specific situations!
Thanks Bart.
You da man
these animations are legit
Caller, you’ve been subjected to exploitative play.
I once seen an ace high flush, king high and queen high all on the flop
Once again your spider senses were correct! Great hand breakdown and absolutely love the new graphics! Great job Bart! Hope the family is well!
Poker is still beatable when I see how badly some players call
"snap call unless you're a nit" could easily be the ultimate troll or a dead serious texan.
On the bright side, the caller wasn’t a nit…
Dear caller, I have a poker game with an empty seat tomorrow night. Let me know if you want in!
🤣
Bart = goat of analysis
This is one of my favorite call-ins! Really helped me understand the concept of underbluffed spots. I love how passionate Bart is about it
Dope new graphics. Very pleasing to the eye!
Just a cooler, but agree with Bart on fast playing it.
On the river caller says " that's kind of what I was thinking when I bet large ....". Nope, you clearly were NOT thinking when you bet that large on the river :)
This one goes in my top ten of your vids. Thanks-a-bunch.
Entitlement tilt call
Exactly
Easy turn check and river call. Lose less that way.
Hero had the chance to save his money on the river. But the interesting part is how his hand plays against the other parts of his opponent's range. Against sets, overpairs, 2 pairs, he's losing value by not 3-betting the flop. Against worse flushes, losing value by not 3-betting the flop. Against the stiff ace of clubs, losing value and protection by not 3-betting the flop. With 2 suited cards you only flop a flush 1 in 100 times. With 2 fewer clubs it's less than that. And as another commenter noted, the big AX of clubs are 3-bet for sure, it's just really unlikely that both players flopped a flush, god bless him. Get the money in on the flop, yeah, you're losing to the tippy top of your opponent's get it in on the flop range but you're crushing the rest of that range, all sets, all overpairs, all top pairs with the ace of clubs, all stiff ace of clubs.
New intro?✔️ Insane thumbnail?✔️ New CrushLivePoker video?✔️ Am I going to like the video?✔️
Check back on river. Nuff said.
Man this stuff is good. 👍
Am I completely weird...I thought about checking back the river
check back the river, only move possible.
there's a sucker born every minute
Bet $300 into $400 and call a shove 😂😂😂😂
In order to call this bet, you have to think he has lower flush or sets or something along those lines that he's turning into a bluff, or maybe drastically over valuing a queen high flush I guess, and that hands like that are at least 27% of his range.
And on top of this being a classic underbluffed spot, we've played our hand exactly like you'd play the but flush. So its hard to imagine him wanting to bluff that much.
Whew love that intro!!!
I was the villian in hand. Once the 4th club came, I was pretty sure he had a big club that he was going to bet and hopefully call with. I raise the flop to build the pot and to give other flushes, sets, etc a chance to raise me back. I'm only bluffing there when I think he has a club that cant call all in. Once he bets 300 on river never I'm never bluffing.I hit quads the hand before and I think hero may have thought two nuts in a row? Either way a cooler, Don't think it was a terrible call but in hind sight pretty obvious I have the nuts.
The turn wasn’t raised? Do you mean the flop?
Edited
Horrible call by him. Like Bart said, 4 clubs on the board and isn't paired. Never in my life have I seen a bluff played like that on a board like that. And yes, youre obvious as all hell.
How does it feel to be a villain? lol.......I keep thinking to myself as the hero, what can my opponent have? The Q is on the table, I have the K. So, for my opponent to bluff off his entire stack, he has to have at best the Jack.......would my opponent really bluff off his entire stack with the A and K out there and me betting the entire way? I might have played the hand in a similar fashion to the hero up until the river check. I would have checked back figuring you had the A of clubs, and being quite ok with taking down a good pot and not getting the maximum if you don't.......either way, I avoid getting jammed on when I don't have the nuts........but as you said, the hand with quads prior might have influenced his decision making too.
What made you call PF with the suited ace rather than raise? That turn check was very very sneaky sir.
in theory you are supposed to bluff any two cards at a low fequency, but in reality the opponent is either a maniac who wildly overbluffs or a normal player that underbluffs
yeah true. There are some players where you have to call here.
The intro was sick
I can't remember the last time someone has showed me a check raise bluff on the river aside from an extreme action player. Even if he min raised me on this river I mighta folded. Before this channel I used to always shrug and call in these spots and I've been saving so much money making disciplined folds.
Villain missed out on a great opportunity for the triple check-raise.
@@skyeangelofdeath7363 I am always looking for a chance to triple check-raise. It is quite rare.
Like Bart said..."He is getting all my money too but just in a different way." Totally agree.
Good stuff man. Keep it going!
Why not check the turn? Save money versus the Ac, maybe get looser calls on the river or maybe even pick off a weird bluff. Free cards are probably not a big risk after the turn. How often does he have two pair on 952, even versus the button min-raise? He probably doesn't flat 99 very often. He check-raised small on the flop too. That seems weighted towards flushes and the Ac. He might call small twice with a lower flush, but you could just bet bigger on the river and get the same value.
Thumbs up both for content and augmented production values!
New intro is sick
Nice graphics. WOW. Someone needs to send the caller a "can't bluff the fish" T shirt. How can any sane villain have anything but the NF when you bet 75% on the river and he shoves? There would have to be some remarkable and weird history for this to EVER be a bluff.
Shoe-in to the HOF of worst played hands.
I would remove the dealer from my Christmas card list.
Sick visuals and music
Another great dissection
Dig the new graphics, Bart. Don’t think we didn’t notice 😉. Great analysis as always!
Caller had 2 flushes here. Listen closely. At 10:00 minutes, u can hear his toilet flush.
New intro, love it
Yeah? Well, you know... That's just like, your opinion, man
@@vukasinbojovic1369 😂💯
Love the new graphics and the analysis as always 👍
I like checking back turn based on how i ranged the V when he x/r'd flop, small sets, small flushes, and nut flushes, i don't think we ever get 3 streets of value vs the hands we beat so im content with checking turn and looking to bet for value otr if checked to. the board can't really change too much unless board pairs but i don't think that is too relevant , you can still get paid in that case if you size down
This caller isn't too bright
Maybe this is wrong, but this is a SNAP check back on the river for me
It’s definitely not bet $300 into $420. If you’re capable of bet-folding you can bet small to target a crying call from a smaller club.
If you don’t have the discipline to fold the K best just check back I think.
@@skyeangelofdeath7363 Really insightful commentary....
@@skyeangelofdeath7363 so how do you play the river then?
I re-popped a kid on the turn like a month ago and he was like I call raises on the flop not the turn. So vs another lag tonight, I flopped top two and got the check raise in on the flop and the money went in for the nice double up.
I put villain on the ace of clubs on the flop so once the 4th clubs comes i'm checking all the way down with the intention of folding to any bet.
Putting villian on ONE hand on the flop may not be the best poker strategy
@@luisbenites4825 I agree, ranging an opponent on one specific hand or card is not the best idea.
The SB is calling with any suits cards, so he can easily have a smaller flush. I think any flush, even the nut low flush will check raise the flop. The caller played it well on the flop since most strong hands will look to check raise, so his hand is actually fairly disguised and any flush will check raise his $20 lead.
On the river though… not betting that much and VERY begrudgingly folding to the check raise. Its a spot thats never bluffed and we’ve already been check raised once in the hand already.
You’re checking behind on the turn AND then folding to any bet on the river? That seems too nitty. You’ve way underrepped your hand at that point. If the turn goes check-check and villain bets a reasonable amount you have to call it off in case villain is betting the Jc/Tc and trying to get a cry call from worse.
@@nicks210684 The Jc/ TC is a bluff catcher. He's not value betting. He's only betting with the ace of clubs or a bluff and he's never bluffing into me who could easily be holding the nuts or the K of clubs which i have. So it;s a pretty trivial fold.
@@michaelmulvania6060I’ll have to agree to disagree on that one. I’ve seen plenty of players bet the Jc/Tc on a 4 flush board.
Love the new graphics. If this was me everyone would say “thAt’s wHy you dOn’t play K6 SuItEd.”
Solid breakdown!
After watching this, I'm thinking going forward I'm just going to check my King high flushs down, and fold to a insane over bet.
In your stated approach here, would it matter if the board is 3-flush vs. 4-flush? (I'm relatively inexperienced compared to most who watch and comment here, so it's a genuine question for you and anyone else). When I'm on the river and the board is 3-flush, then I'm feeling much better about my king-high flush than if there are 4 on the board (even though in this example, I'd have been toast either way).
@@jvandyck87 I'm going to use this same scenario going forward, because it didn't matter if it was a three card or four card flush, he was still beat, and they both flopped it. To be honest you have get your reads on, and just know you don't have the nuts if the board runs out like this.
@@Eighthousand sometimes winning the minimum and/or losing the minimum is not always a bad thing. Sometimes the board just doesn’t run out in a way to where you can get max value, it’s just max pain.
I’m okay with all of the hero’s bets, until the river. Here’s my thoughts, any set is check calling hoping they can see a cheap river to hope to pair the board and any middling club just sigh folds. With the hero betting on the river, the hands I just described would fold anyways, due to lack of showdown value (set losses to any club) and only A of club calls/raises you on that river, so hero donated $900 that he didn’t have to. There’s a strong likelihood that villain leads out for $300 and hero could either sigh call/fold. The call of the check raise is just an unnecessary donation. Those are the hands that truly make a difference in our poker sessions. Villain got a massive payoff and hero made a massive punt.
I thought he might have the nut flush with the small 3 bet on the flop. It seems he would bet larger if he were protecting a smaller flush or semi-bluffing.
This was a good one, i woulda lost my money as Bart would have.
Definetly folding river tho if played as caller.
I don't bet this river. What are you hoping he calls with?
This new intro is FIRE
nice intro bart!
Poor caller
Fantastic new introduction @Bart!!!
imagine Person making a call to the show to discuss some of his punt hands lol
I am scared money.......I would have checked back on the river. The guy showed no fear of the flush up to that point. I would have put him on a hand with the A of clubs and been cursing my bad luck at that turn club....only to find out that that turn club actually saved my stack.
@@skyeangelofdeath7363 "but checking that river is simply good poker. Betting it is idiotic."
That is NOT good poker if you always check that river.
The opponent could have sets or lower flushes that will call a small bet. Losing out on value, by only betting the nuts in these, makes you predictable and is -EV.
@@fomori2 lower flush/set would not call 70% turn bet in this hand context. Skye Angel is right: checking river is a good poker.
@@pot_kivach160 so you’re saying Bart is wrong then? Since he favours betting small on the river and folding to a raise.
@@nicks210684 i did not say he is wrong. Betting small might work, however, small amount of time. So, other than mixing it up, betting (river) is losing on the long run. When the opponent checks, I have to have reading to see that as a weak hand; otherwise, worst case scenario applies.
.
Look, this was a live game, so one has to be at the table to properly judge what’s right move. Like: seeing more than just that one hand to understand many relevant. Like: what if V already scanned H profile, put him on weak, and knew that fish will bite on river? Against someone else, he might not checked? I cannot know that just by watching one sided report.
Very interesting hand breakdown!
Intro is 🔥🔥🔥
The minraise is a problem because it brings in all kinds of Ax hands, like Bart said. Middling suited aces like Ac8c makes sense. Having said that, as played, checking turn is standard, checking the river however, means the opponent must put the caller on a hand he cannot fold to a jam. Would a player call the all in with top 2? A set maybe? We know players on average won't be folding broadway strength 4 flushes.
New intro just got me so hype. Love it!
Fancy!!!!!!!!
I actually see this pretty often, and with worse hands. Something like 87s flops a flush, and then there's a four-to-a-flush card on the river and they will pay off a lot more than if they had say A8o with 8 as their flush card.
I think it's a similar mechanism as with not letting AA go on a board with four-to-a-straight or flush.
I've been this caller at with red KK utg, I raised 3x called in a few spots and late position called me a4d. Flop was 1052d blank 3d. Bet about 1/2 pot both times and a check call from him I checked because I was too terrible to fold on the river and called his 1/2 pot bet. Rivering the steel wheel was overkill. lol
Loving the new intro dude
He didn’t 3 bet flop cuz he doesnt have a 3 bet bluff range on the flop. He’s never bluffing
Here's where Bart is wrong. He can raise all in on attempt to folding out the K
Love the new intro!
New intro is 🔥!
This caller is braindead lol bart is so patient
Badass new intro!!!
like the new graphics except for 1 thing. under the board texture, next to pot, the $ sign is on the wrong side
That intro is fire! 🔥🔥 😍
Love the new graphics. Well done.
Like the new graphics tweaks and intro 😎👍
The game is truly maddening.
If the Button never makes his goofy min raise and just folds, this hand never happens. The blinds just chop.
Both the SB and BB are calling $5 with basically any two, and of course they flop the nuts and the second nuts.
Its wild. A friend of mine likes to say “the cards are very mysterious” I have to agree. These spots happen way more than one would think they should.
If button folds SB can raise right? I’d imagine SB would elect to open with A8cc. That’s a big hand heads up!
@14:00 "How could he bluff here. If he doesn't have the A of clubs he just can't do it". I sympathize with this mentality but you have to understand many villains KNOW THIS which suddenly makes a bluff possible because if YOU the hero have, say, 10 clubs or even J clubs you might fold. People aren't always worried that they're beat. They SHOULD be but everyone just doesn't play that way.
There was a pretty famous hand between Daniel Negreneau and Tom Dwan. Tom had the nuts, a full house and Daniel shoved on the river. Tom snap called and when Daniel saw his hand he said "Ah, that's the hand I was repping".
So here villain could shove without the nuts simply repping it. If you don't have the A of clubs in your hand you have to fold.
Nonetheless I'm definitely folding here and Hero did this to himself he should have made a huge reraise on the flop. A flopped flush is such an underrepped hand almost nobody is giving you credit for that hand. But another club would either kill your action or kill you.
Actually looking back now this is just a straight fold. What I said would only apply if hero had checked the river or bet small. But betting $300 on that river - only a complete maniac would shove.
3 betting the flop looks like a weak flopped flush, and youre betting for protection.
Once I saw a guy 4 bet a 4 card flush board on the river as a bluff, but I think he must have seen his neighbor fold the ace. The 3 bettor was bluffing too. 7s9dJd3d2d board flop c/c turn c/c river, pot(20) bet 12, raise to 37, reraise to 107, 4bet to 465, fold, 4 bettor shows 86 no diamond. 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯 4 bettor was a super rich Dubai guy.
I wouldn't have bet so big on the turn but if the hand had went that way I'm definitely checking back the river when he calls my large turn bet after raising the flop
You nailed it!
It's funny how hero says that he kept betting big because villain was keep checking to him and therefore hero thought villain wouldn't have the nuts...... But why SHOULDN'T villain be checking the nuts if hero is betting so big as a response to the checks.
I would have led out as well, it hides that you hit the flush. It would look like you had a pair or a flush draw. I would have re-raised him after he re-raised on the flop with the hope of getting it all in but would have been when I saw he had the nuts flush. It's just one of those bad days at the table!
I disagree with Bart. He says it's impossible to bluff here. This dude could very well use this spot to use that 4 liner as a scare card to rep he had AA with the A♧ or A♧Kx or A♧9x ....I agree this is not typically a bluffing spot and it's hard for him to be bluffing...but I don't think it's ENTIRELY impossible
With that said Bart has probably forgotten more about poker more than I'll ever know. But I gotta say, it's entirely possible for this dude to put hero on a big hand and use that 4th club as a scare card.... unlikely, but not impossible
Brad 3beting the flop is obviously super strong. It's a mid stakes game. 3betting flop probably means you won't stack the opponent.
Thanks learning a lot… I’m a new Sub!
Intro is money
Great! Oh no