Okay everyone has no chill about what Anna said about the royal baby. It is what she thinks, she's American so of course her opinion is going to be different and I'm British and I didn't really care about the royal baby. I love Anna she's so funny, everyone else stfu and leave her alone
+FanGirl Lucy I truly think that the royal baby mattered more to americans and the rest of the world than British. I live in the Uk and all the people I know don't care at all about the royal family.
In America, no one cares about the royal baby. My friends had babies recently, I care more about that. The royal baby isn't special, hasn't accomplished anything.
I love how Anna wants her fans to know about her embarrassing stories instead of her sweet ones while other celebrities try to hide the embarrassing ones. *Anna is a mischievous angel*
Karina_129 I live in the UK too... Just because a few people from your peer group don't pay attention to the monarchy doesn't mean the rest of the population doesn't. The vast majority of the population of the UK are in favour of the monarchy... That is why we still have a monarchy and haven't voted for a republic. It's a statistical fact, you can look it up. If no one cared, it wouldn't be top news. Don't be so ignorant.
I didn't understand all the baby mania, my grandma called me and was like"quick turn on the TV the baby is about to come through the door" you couldn't even see its face it could have literally been a ball of blankets😂
Trust me Anna, when you were in England experiencing the Royal Baby mania there was a country somewhere north of there where all five million of us didn't give a toss. You should come to Scotland. You'd really fit in.
Of all the big name talk show hosts, I personally think that Seth Myers is the best at interviews. He rarely interrupts, never speaks over the person, doesn't rely on antics or any character flaws to turn into grossly over used comedy, just an enjoyable host to watch. And Anna Kendrick is adorable as always
Tal Moore - And yet, I get the feeling that if I had referred to Obama, the Emporer of the United Countries of America, someone would have pointed out the error. Which is the flipside of what you just did for the UK.
Tal Moore - You're obviously a bit of a little baby about being corrected. So, if you want to make up titles for the Queen, who am I to help you learn the correct title. I was simply trying to lightly point out that it really does look as idiotic as referring to Obama as an emperor instead of a president. Obviously, you don't care, so just enjoy yourself, I guess. Clearly your pride is more important than using the correct title for the most famous world leader, and perhaps person, on earth. Why would something so trivial matter to someone as important as you, eh.
Okay, so people in the uk really aren't bothered about the arrival of the royal baby but it's just common procedure for the birth to be celebrated as a tradition
Her description of Royal Baby mania can be in a way parallel to the obsession with celebrity culture and what could possibly make her book sell - just a thought.
Some people sure did take what she said to heart. She obviously didn't say it in an offensive way and didn't mean it to be. She doesn't get why people are so hyped over a baby who has just been born and want to know what the baby looks like etc.
I cared about the baby being born not because she's royal but because it's nice to have news that isn't about politics or death or reality stars fighting over chapstick or whatever they fight about.
I only had this on in the background and when she said that her Mum had a spreadsheet, I did not think twice or even notice. I thiught it was normal, then I realised, not everyone has an acountant as a Mum
Why are you all getting offended by what she thinks about the baby? You have your own opinions and so does she. So what if certain people don't show any interest in the royal baby!
weather you care or not.... saying he wont ever do anything isn't completely accurate. The head of state still serves a purpose.. even if its largely seen as symbolic nowadays
+Qermaq I guarantee the 34 people who liked your comment are women - she's one of those celebs that women love because they are reminded of themselves, but i'm sorry to break it to you, as talented as she is, she is not pretty in the slightest.
Anna Kendrick just got so much of my respect for saying that, why would anyone worship the "Royal Family". I get it it's history and tradition but that's all it is now, history. In modern times they're just a bunch of superficial human beings that get worshiped for being born.
She's not impressed by the people who are overly hyping up about the baby. Some people seem to have taken her comment to heart, she obviously didn't mean to offend anyone.
People who say the baby is just a baby... I wonder would that phrase be used if some celebrity, lets say one of the Kardashians for instance had a child I would imagine people would be going crazy over that, the only difference is that the royal baby wont grow up do be a porn star or what ever else that family does.
Our current queen has been our head of state since 1952. Now imagine that a child was born in America that would be your head of state for their entire life, until they die. You really think, no one would care about it? It's also not just the UK, but the Queen is head of state for Canada, Australia and a dozen other countries. She is also the head of the commonwealth which represents a billion people. So, if you don't get it, you don't get the world.
milanosrp - She undertakes all the ceremonial and non political duties of a head of state, which is a vast program of duties including entertaining all heads of state and major political and economic leaders, when they visit the UK and undertaking such visits abroad on behalf of the nation. I'm an atheist myself and would prefer separation of church and state, but as the head of the church of England, she again undertakes countless duties and obviously leads the official religion of what is still a Christian nation. I think most would consider this alone to be an incredibly significant position, especially considering there are 26 CofE Bishops in the house of lords who can vote on laws in the UK. Aside from these duties, like it or not she represents more than anything what the UK stands for, in her role, as you refer to it of our "figure head." The monarch is how those billion members of the commonwealth and the rest of the world see our nation and all those ceremonial duties are meticulously planned to create an image of what the UK stands for as an entity, both to show off our military might, which are intertwined into everything she does for this purpose and our economic and historical stability. It might not seem a great deal, but the reason the White House in the USA is an intimidating building is because that is the image America wants to give to the world. Wow, I went on a lot, but it seems strange to me that people do not see how a nation forms an image far beyond politics. Would you say for example that Obama represents everything that is the image of America around the globe or is it all of their ceremonial practices and how they present their nation. Anyway, if you got to the end of this congratulations.
Robert J. Williamson I did. I don't think there's anything wrong with the fact that you "went on a lot." :) I can understand your point, but I guess we just disagree on the amount of power that "ceremonial power" entails. I think political power is overwhelmingly larger. Also, along with the secularization of England, the power of a head of a Church of England has become fairly marginal. I think we agree in that she's just a figure head; you, yourself relate her to a piece of architecture. As such, it doesn't really matter what she's like. She can be groomed to play the part she needs to. Lastly, this is also the second baby, so she probably won't become the "head of state for her entire life." This is literally just fluff. It's simple English pop culture.
milanosrp - I was referring to the actual Queen. They seem to be referring to the "mania" around George as at 2:03 they refer to the baby being King and says HE'S not going to do anything. Also, only George had a full front page of the Dail Mail when he was born. So, she is talking about the birth of George. I know this interview is recent and it has been as being about Charlotte, but, she is definitely talking about being there for the other birth. Also, there was not flags up or anything she mentions for the second birth. Anyway, yes, we disagree over how much the image given by a monarch is important to national identity and how we are perceived abroad and there what we are as a country. Also Laboiuur and the Tories are just the same part and keep the idiots busy voting for one or the other. Nothing much changes and you just move the needle slightly left or right. It means nothing. The country is run by the elite, of which the Royal Family are the leaders.
Robert J. Williamson Oh great, so the entire world is but Commonwealth, isn't it? Go to all the commonwealth countries and boast about your almighty Queen, let's see how welcome you will be. Dare you to do it in front of the aboriginals?
The times suck. If the British want to celebrate a royal baby, more power to them. It's a sweet, wholesome thing to collectively feel good about. If it's not your thing, who cares? It doesn't hurt anybody and it's an excuse to celebrate.
Clearly it doesn't mean anything to you because the U.S. doesn't have a queen. But to others that are living in England or Canada, Australia etc. it means a great deal. Knowing who might be the next queen or king is definitely something that lots of people are interested about. Maybe you should take an interest in stuff that happens outside of your country.
Which London did she visit? I live in London and most people just enjoyed seeing a nice picture in the newspaper, no big flags and cakes, plenty didn't care much at all.
She is so right. I live in England and it's totally ridiculous. I don't even care about the royal family cause they don't do anything especially the baby
The dailymail is like reading a tabloid rather than a serious newspaper infact go on the website for the dailymail and you'll see it's true tabloid colours.
All these British people are butt hurt, but last time I checked, everyone is entitled to their opinion. So don't be complaining and saying that she's in the wrong.
I'm not interested in the royal baby, but it isn't so weird that some people are, just as Americans are really into some really stupid things and are so proud with their flags! Lol
What's wrong with you ppl? Why's the royal baby hype bothering you? If Britishers are celebrating it, let them. Its part of their culture and one of the thing i like about them is they donot forsake their culture. For me, every baby is precious, whether its a royal baby or not. But saying a few good words like how cute baby Charlotte is, wouldn't hurt you.
I totally get your point, but there are some times where you just don´t get it. It´s really not a big deal, maybe is the same feeling that you have for some sports fanatics wondering the reason of their euphorism. She wasn´t criticizing , she just did not get it. Neither do I by the way.
well one time I me and my friends were playing tag... and I was running and my skirt fell down to my ankels... and I uh fell down and everyone laughed at me.. the really sucked
Oh wow, someone else thinks like me and don't care about the baby as I have had three the novelty wears off within a week lmao they all look like squashed tomatoes when they are first born and the royal one is just the same
It's funny how the U.S. Was so obsessed with the Kate and Wills wedding but not about the birth of their child. They are not your royals so people from the UK and the Commonwealth don't expect you to understand the significance, especially since the royal baby was a girl. (Personally, I'm just proud I guessed the name correctly)
Hannah!!! people from the UK DON'T hold with this mythical "significance". ONLY a nest of masochistic tabloid-led 2-legged sheep cling to this "royalty" abomination. THEY ARE PARASITES! if you found one on your dog? you'd pick off & burn it to death or treat your dog with anti-flea/tick juice & poison the damn thing. but it dangles a couple of shiny-shinies in front of you & spends YOUR money feathering IT'S nest & you cretins are all "ooh, aah, aren't they lovely & glorious? PLEASE let us kiss & lick your bare arses". GROW SOME FUCKING PRIDE & DIGNITY! YOU'RE A HUMAN! ACT LIKE ONE!
Possibly because Charlotte isn't your monarch Anna? Americans are very concerned about their presidents and they're not even there for their whole lives. I'm not saying she's not entitled to her opinion, but to say there's no reason to rejoice a Princess' birth is absurd. Long live the Queen, amiright?!
Priscilla Darcey Why should she care? She's being honest.. its an INFANT. that doesn't even understand who her parents are. so honestly yeah in America that is just another baby being born. We do not even really give two craps about Obama's kids. Why would we care about a baby born in another country........
Priscilla Darcey Lets be honest, i'm more bothered about who's the president of America than the queen on England and i'm from England. The queen doesn't actually do anything, that's why we have the government.
+Priscilla Darcey The Royal Family is just superficial for the most part, they're just part of tradition. They don't deal with politics or decide anything. They're pretty much as irrelevant and powerful as celebrities. And Americans aren't really concerned with Presidents, less and less people vote every year, people are only concerned around election time and then basically no fucks are given in general.
"Is it a boy? Is it a girl? Is it a sack of potatoes? I don't know"
- Anna Kendrick, 2015
MultiFandom 😂 THATS why i love her
I just admire her opinion about babies. 100% agree. Just a bunch of sacks of potatoes.
I call them "germ wagons"
Sacks of poop.
"All babies looks like sacks of potatoes! It just looks like a baby!" Omg I love her! 😂
OMG SHE'S WRITING A BOOK!!?? I MUST OWN THIS IMMEDIATELY.
SAME
Same
Okay everyone has no chill about what Anna said about the royal baby. It is what she thinks, she's American so of course her opinion is going to be different and I'm British and I didn't really care about the royal baby. I love Anna she's so funny, everyone else stfu and leave her alone
+FanGirl Lucy I truly think that the royal baby mattered more to americans and the rest of the world than British. I live in the Uk and all the people I know don't care at all about the royal family.
I never said all Americans didn't care about the royal baby, just that their opinion's would be different.
In America, no one cares about the royal baby. My friends had babies recently, I care more about that. The royal baby isn't special, hasn't accomplished anything.
Hmmm... I have been to a lot of family/friends celebrations for birth of a baby and in all instances the baby has not accomplished anything.
I love how Anna wants her fans to know about her embarrassing stories instead of her sweet ones while other celebrities try to hide the embarrassing ones. *Anna is a mischievous angel*
hahaha how offended some people are by the things anna said omg its hilarious
Haha the majority of people in the UK don't care about the royal baby either Anna!
... That's just a lie...
Rudi Leandro its not... I live in the uk and no one that I know gives one about the baby soo
Karina_129 I live in the UK too... Just because a few people from your peer group don't pay attention to the monarchy doesn't mean the rest of the population doesn't. The vast majority of the population of the UK are in favour of the monarchy... That is why we still have a monarchy and haven't voted for a republic. It's a statistical fact, you can look it up. If no one cared, it wouldn't be top news. Don't be so ignorant.
Lydia Cawthorne-Luff You fucking should, the royal baby is royal because the people are banking it, and its family.
Ikr! No one i know cares about the royal baby either
She's the younger version of Tina Fey. They even have the same smile it's uncanny.
WHY must the music at the end be so LOUD?!?!
To wake people up after a boring interview
@@jimmydishkawnt why u gotta hate 😐
I love her so much
I didn't understand all the baby mania, my grandma called me and was like"quick turn on the TV the baby is about to come through the door" you couldn't even see its face it could have literally been a ball of blankets😂
Anna Kendrick, Scarlett Johannson, and Jennifer Lawrence in 'The Witches of Eastwick' remake. Go.
shes so crazyyyyy can't take her anywhereeeee
I just noticed that Anna does that hair tuck behind her ear reminds me of Kristen Stewart.
Trust me Anna, when you were in England experiencing the Royal Baby mania there was a country somewhere north of there where all five million of us didn't give a toss. You should come to Scotland. You'd really fit in.
Who keeps a spreadsheet of family stories??? Anna's mom does! That is so sweet!
3:06 is the cutest thing I've ever seen I love her so much
God shes so beautiful
Of all the big name talk show hosts, I personally think that Seth Myers is the best at interviews. He rarely interrupts, never speaks over the person, doesn't rely on antics or any character flaws to turn into grossly over used comedy, just an enjoyable host to watch. And Anna Kendrick is adorable as always
A sack of potatoes could probably do a sufficient job as king of england.
Tal Moore - There is no such title as "King of England," it doesn't exist.
Robert J. Williamson Good point. My joke is now nullified, because all jokes must have a basis in reality.
Tal Moore - And yet, I get the feeling that if I had referred to Obama, the Emporer of the United Countries of America, someone would have pointed out the error. Which is the flipside of what you just did for the UK.
Robert J. Williamson You're right, because referring to Obama as emperor of the US isn't funny in the least.
Tal Moore - You're obviously a bit of a little baby about being corrected. So, if you want to make up titles for the Queen, who am I to help you learn the correct title. I was simply trying to lightly point out that it really does look as idiotic as referring to Obama as an emperor instead of a president. Obviously, you don't care, so just enjoy yourself, I guess. Clearly your pride is more important than using the correct title for the most famous world leader, and perhaps person, on earth. Why would something so trivial matter to someone as important as you, eh.
Okay, so people in the uk really aren't bothered about the arrival of the royal baby but it's just common procedure for the birth to be celebrated as a tradition
Anna you are an awesome role model better than a lot of people.... your humor is just so funny wish i could meet you xx
the baby is SUCH an old soul its incredible.
Her description of Royal Baby mania can be in a way parallel to the obsession with celebrity culture and what could possibly make her book sell - just a thought.
I love how she sits so elegantly in every single interview
Minute mark 2:52 her laugh 😍😍😍
She was in Paris once, and she thought that she was in London.
Anna's face right at the end😂
Seth is such a good interviewer!
Some people sure did take what she said to heart. She obviously didn't say it in an offensive way and didn't mean it to be.
She doesn't get why people are so hyped over a baby who has just been born and want to know what the baby looks like etc.
I cared about the baby being born not because she's royal but because it's nice to have news that isn't about politics or death or reality stars fighting over chapstick or whatever they fight about.
It's the same sentiment for most actresses and actors... - who cares what they think, say, or do...
She's SUSPICIOUSLY perfect.
All her opinions on stuff are the same as mine...
I only had this on in the background and when she said that her Mum had a spreadsheet, I did not think twice or even notice. I thiught it was normal, then I realised, not everyone has an acountant as a Mum
Why are you all getting offended by what she thinks about the baby? You have your own opinions and so does she. So what if certain people don't show any interest in the royal baby!
Basically, we take any excuse to have a party.
chris4072511 Any excuse to be pissed before lunch time is a bonus.
weather you care or not.... saying he wont ever do anything isn't completely accurate. The head of state still serves a purpose.. even if its largely seen as symbolic nowadays
So pretty and funny. And legs. Oh, the legs.
+Qermaq I guarantee the 34 people who liked your comment are women - she's one of those celebs that women love because they are reminded of themselves, but i'm sorry to break it to you, as talented as she is, she is not pretty in the slightest.
Tom Opinions. I think she's gorgeous.
Tom you're dumb
Enigmatic well then you haven't seen The Last Five Years
The royal baby's name is Charlotte , and that's my name xD
So?
@@thatgirl3458 Lol 😂
Idk wht all the hype is about what anna said ? she said nothing bad at all. and honestly I don't care about the baby either ... I agree with her
Never more true words have spoken i think exactly the same Anna XD I nick named my friends baby potato and spud XD
I understand the celebration when Prince George was born but don't quite understand it with Princess Charlotte and I also live in the UK.
when she laughs i forget that its her . my brain is looking at tina fey
Am I the only one who thinks she could be Tina Fey's younger sister?
New drinking game right here peep's. A shot of tequila for every time she say LIKE.... Let's party!
She shines so brightly that Seth looks like a cardboard cutout
Any country with a long royal tradition would do the same. It's a sign of respect and legacy.
Anna Kendrick just got so much of my respect for saying that, why would anyone worship the "Royal Family". I get it it's history and tradition but that's all it is now, history. In modern times they're just a bunch of superficial human beings that get worshiped for being born.
Same reason many americans worship the Kardashian whores and their babies with directions names.
And poor British people are still paying their taxes to afford a family which doesn't really help their lives so much
Larry Smith You pay 60p a year my dude.
@@phone5579 Still a waste.
Which one has the higher pitched voice?
"A full page of the Daily Mail" tells you everything you need to know about that story. Trust me, most people in the UK couldn't care less either.
She's not impressed by the people who are overly hyping up about the baby. Some people seem to have taken her comment to heart, she obviously didn't mean to offend anyone.
She's gorgeous and funny.
holy sht! hahaha i cannot stop laughing! mom! damnit! anna
People who say the baby is just a baby... I wonder would that phrase be used if some celebrity, lets say one of the Kardashians for instance had a child I would imagine people would be going crazy over that, the only difference is that the royal baby wont grow up do be a porn star or what ever else that family does.
Our current queen has been our head of state since 1952. Now imagine that a child was born in America that would be your head of state for their entire life, until they die. You really think, no one would care about it? It's also not just the UK, but the Queen is head of state for Canada, Australia and a dozen other countries. She is also the head of the commonwealth which represents a billion people. So, if you don't get it, you don't get the world.
Robert J. Williamson But she's just a figure head. It's not like she actually does anything.
milanosrp - She undertakes all the ceremonial and non political duties of a head of state, which is a vast program of duties including entertaining all heads of state and major political and economic leaders, when they visit the UK and undertaking such visits abroad on behalf of the nation. I'm an atheist myself and would prefer separation of church and state, but as the head of the church of England, she again undertakes countless duties and obviously leads the official religion of what is still a Christian nation. I think most would consider this alone to be an incredibly significant position, especially considering there are 26 CofE Bishops in the house of lords who can vote on laws in the UK. Aside from these duties, like it or not she represents more than anything what the UK stands for, in her role, as you refer to it of our "figure head." The monarch is how those billion members of the commonwealth and the rest of the world see our nation and all those ceremonial duties are meticulously planned to create an image of what the UK stands for as an entity, both to show off our military might, which are intertwined into everything she does for this purpose and our economic and historical stability. It might not seem a great deal, but the reason the White House in the USA is an intimidating building is because that is the image America wants to give to the world. Wow, I went on a lot, but it seems strange to me that people do not see how a nation forms an image far beyond politics. Would you say for example that Obama represents everything that is the image of America around the globe or is it all of their ceremonial practices and how they present their nation. Anyway, if you got to the end of this congratulations.
Robert J. Williamson I did. I don't think there's anything wrong with the fact that you "went on a lot." :)
I can understand your point, but I guess we just disagree on the amount of power that "ceremonial power" entails. I think political power is overwhelmingly larger. Also, along with the secularization of England, the power of a head of a Church of England has become fairly marginal. I think we agree in that she's just a figure head; you, yourself relate her to a piece of architecture. As such, it doesn't really matter what she's like. She can be groomed to play the part she needs to.
Lastly, this is also the second baby, so she probably won't become the "head of state for her entire life." This is literally just fluff. It's simple English pop culture.
milanosrp - I was referring to the actual Queen. They seem to be referring to the "mania" around George as at 2:03 they refer to the baby being King and says HE'S not going to do anything. Also, only George had a full front page of the Dail Mail when he was born. So, she is talking about the birth of George. I know this interview is recent and it has been as being about Charlotte, but, she is definitely talking about being there for the other birth. Also, there was not flags up or anything she mentions for the second birth.
Anyway, yes, we disagree over how much the image given by a monarch is important to national identity and how we are perceived abroad and there what we are as a country. Also Laboiuur and the Tories are just the same part and keep the idiots busy voting for one or the other. Nothing much changes and you just move the needle slightly left or right. It means nothing. The country is run by the elite, of which the Royal Family are the leaders.
Robert J. Williamson Oh great, so the entire world is but Commonwealth, isn't it? Go to all the commonwealth countries and boast about your almighty Queen, let's see how welcome you will be. Dare you to do it in front of the aboriginals?
I'm from England and I can genuinely say.....I didn't know what the name was until 2 months after he was born
The Daily Mail..?? hahaha
The times suck. If the British want to celebrate a royal baby, more power to them. It's a sweet, wholesome thing to collectively feel good about. If it's not your thing, who cares? It doesn't hurt anybody and it's an excuse to celebrate.
Clearly it doesn't mean anything to you because the U.S. doesn't have a queen. But to others that are living in England or Canada, Australia etc. it means a great deal. Knowing who might be the next queen or king is definitely something that lots of people are interested about. Maybe you should take an interest in stuff that happens outside of your country.
perhaps it's that time of the month?
Which London did she visit? I live in London and most people just enjoyed seeing a nice picture in the newspaper, no big flags and cakes, plenty didn't care much at all.
look at those _gams_
Why all the news about Pitch Perfect, it hasn't done anything
Suzuya Jūzō I know, just trolling, move along
Seth was close with 1540 seeing as Edward the Sixth was born in 1537.
She is so right. I live in England and it's totally ridiculous. I don't even care about the royal family cause they don't do anything especially the baby
Anna Kendrick says "baby" eight times in 14 seconds from 2:30. Interesting.
anna kendrick and chrissy teigen are the new j-laws
She looked at the dailymail … all respect gone.
The dailymail is like reading a tabloid rather than a serious newspaper infact go on the website for the dailymail and you'll see it's true tabloid colours.
***** The Sun is the best selling newspaper. Not the Mail.
Sack of potatos lmao
All these British people are butt hurt, but last time I checked, everyone is entitled to their opinion. So don't be complaining and saying that she's in the wrong.
I'm not interested in the royal baby, but it isn't so weird that some people are, just as Americans are really into some really stupid things and are so proud with their flags!
Lol
lol Sack of Potatoes, the fourth gender
I don't see why people have to be so down on others being happy about a baby.
What's wrong with you ppl?
Why's the royal baby hype bothering you?
If Britishers are celebrating it, let them. Its part of their culture and one of the thing i like about them is they donot forsake their culture.
For me, every baby is precious, whether its a royal baby or not. But saying a few good words like how cute baby Charlotte is, wouldn't hurt you.
BRITISHERS
*BRITISHERS*
I totally get your point, but there are some times where you just don´t get it. It´s really not a big deal, maybe is the same feeling that you have for some sports fanatics wondering the reason of their euphorism. She wasn´t criticizing , she just did not get it. Neither do I by the way.
I live in the UK and I know what your saying but only 1% of the population is exited about that baby the other 99% either don't care or want cake
I feel she is jalous of little George. All the attention... As an actress she should know about that
It's just us, it's a British thing aha
well one time I me and my friends were playing tag... and I was running and my skirt fell down to my ankels... and I uh fell down and everyone laughed at me.. the really sucked
Oh wow, someone else thinks like me and don't care about the baby as I have had three the novelty wears off within a week lmao they all look like squashed tomatoes when they are first born and the royal one is just the same
I'm pretty sure everything she does is cute or magic if you're a fan of The Police.
From now on I'm calling babies sacks of potatoes.
1:02-104
She sounds like Laura Vitale a bit
I'm halfway through and I have heard nothing about the royal baby. The baby wasn't he reason I started to watch the video, though.
Like likelike. Like Like? Like like, likellike like like. Like liiiiike!
It's funny how the U.S. Was so obsessed with the Kate and Wills wedding but not about the birth of their child. They are not your royals so people from the UK and the Commonwealth don't expect you to understand the significance, especially since the royal baby was a girl. (Personally, I'm just proud I guessed the name correctly)
Hannah!!! i wasnt obsessed with either. i agree with anna, WHO CARES
Hannah!!! people from the UK DON'T hold with this mythical "significance". ONLY a nest of masochistic tabloid-led 2-legged sheep cling to this "royalty" abomination. THEY ARE PARASITES! if you found one on your dog? you'd pick off & burn it to death or treat your dog with anti-flea/tick juice & poison the damn thing. but it dangles a couple of shiny-shinies in front of you & spends YOUR money feathering IT'S nest & you cretins are all "ooh, aah, aren't they lovely & glorious? PLEASE let us kiss & lick your bare arses". GROW SOME FUCKING PRIDE & DIGNITY! YOU'RE A HUMAN! ACT LIKE ONE!
Possibly because Charlotte isn't your monarch Anna? Americans are very concerned about their presidents and they're not even there for their whole lives. I'm not saying she's not entitled to her opinion, but to say there's no reason to rejoice a Princess' birth is absurd. Long live the Queen, amiright?!
I'm with ya
Frank Adams I live in Canada and people here have started to refused to vow to the queen if needed
Priscilla Darcey Why should she care? She's being honest.. its an INFANT. that doesn't even understand who her parents are. so honestly yeah in America that is just another baby being born. We do not even really give two craps about Obama's kids. Why would we care about a baby born in another country........
Priscilla Darcey Lets be honest, i'm more bothered about who's the president of America than the queen on England and i'm from England. The queen doesn't actually do anything, that's why we have the government.
+Priscilla Darcey The Royal Family is just superficial for the most part, they're just part of tradition. They don't deal with politics or decide anything. They're pretty much as irrelevant and powerful as celebrities. And Americans aren't really concerned with Presidents, less and less people vote every year, people are only concerned around election time and then basically no fucks are given in general.
want is so special about riteing a boot
Hey, Seth Meyers. King Henry VIII was King of England in 1540, and his last recorded child was born in 1537. Shame on you.
I love Anna Kendrick. But does she really need to use the word "like", every 3 words in?
Anna just wants potatoes
Tina Fey's love child? Anyone?
im british and I don't give two fucks about any royal family member! let alone another baby! I agree with anna, its just a baby!
yeah, who the hell cares about a 'royal' baby?!
1:25 = fake Seth Meyers laugh.
I’m from the the uk and couldn’t care about any royal baby either
Like ... like ... like ... like ... like.
she cant go to uk anymore