The beginning was the best part for me. I loved the nods and hints of Spielberg influence thrown in. I liked the antagonist, I think he had a good arc and motive and I am a big fan of the actor.
@@razorpit I didn’t like the rest of the movie. I think it was ruined by introducing a new character because it’s a closing of a franchise, it should have returning characters and a new villain. The whole Helena character was pointless, and she was not only an unlikeable character but she had no meaning.
I think they made her unlikeable on purpose. She heavily reminds Indy of how his son became rebelious and how it got him killed which Indy blames himself for that, meanwhile Helena who's his goddaughter which he basically neglected went down a bad path after losing her father to his own madness, she tried to keep people away and just get money in order to "survive" as crooks tend to do. But in the end when Indy just wanted to give up completly and die in the past she couldn't let it happen again. I think that in the end she saved him from his past while he saved her too. I like it because it was intentional and also unlike other characters she wasn't a cliche of a smart researcher or anything.@@I_O246
I was so so SO impressed with the de-aging in this film. If I didn’t know how old Harrison Ford actually is, I wouldn’t have known the difference. How far the technology has come in so short a time! The only time I truly noticed any difference was when Indy was hanging from the rope - the rope looked weird, but not his face. Incredible work by the artists.
@@davinalopez-oz1ez I noticed that too, although cgi enhanced is look, his voice was not on point, and I get it, age never fails but they could have used some program or something else to improved it!
Yeah, so did I. So did a lot of people. The haters are a very loud minority online that are repeating a lot of copypasta over and over. I actually went into the film quite apprehensive because of all the crap that those people were saying, and came away very surprised. It's actually a hell of a lot of fun.
I'm fairly sure they used a body double for the most dynamic scenes. Ford really is in peak shape for an 80 year old - hell, for even a 60 year old - but he no longer moves like he did in his 40s...
Honestly, some of the best de-aging I have ever seen. I really liked this movie, it bums me out that people tore it apart. It’s like my dad said when we went to see it. “what more could they have wanted, why isn’t that good enough?” (he put it in his top three of the series)
For real i don't get the hate. Yea, it wasn't a perfect movie for sure, i surely could critize a lot, but i left the cinema with a smile on my face and a good memory, what more could i demand for the price of a movie ticket?
ปีที่แล้ว
@@causti9744 Barbie RULES, i living in strange times
@@Plathismo The new indiana jones game is absolutely fantastic and feels exactly like this. The voice/performance actor nails it and the direction is perfect. Can't praise it high enough
"presenting A adventure", what's up the Americans and not knowing when to use "A" and "An", come on, it's called AN adventure, cause the following word after AN starts with a vocal letter, in this cause Adventure, A, so embarrassing and annoying.
There were parts with young Indy where his mannerisms seemed pretty obviously older Harrison Ford -- the way he moves and acts has changed. That said, there were many moments that felt completely real, and overall that intro felt like a great Indy short-film all in itself. I'm glad the sequence was so long.
"presenting A adventure", what's up the Americans and not knowing when to use "A" and "An", come on, it's called AN adventure, cause the following word after AN starts with a vocal letter, in this cause Adventure, A, so embarrassing and annoying.
I’m not surprised at all at Harrison doing many of his physical acting, but God damn is it amazing to see him in action! Especially meant to be his 40 year old self! Still got that energy and you can tell, not only physical alone, but mental like when he talks about his voice The first 20 minutes of this film clearly shows James Mangold, Harrison, and everyone got what it takes to make a classic Indy adventure in modern cinema. The rest of the film then shows that they could also do a new Indy adventure, and like what Harrison been saying “Tell a story about Indy that we think we’d never see.” I enjoyed this film. Showing the old Indy we know and love to an Indy we never expected. Life won’t always be in your favor, but you gotta keep going. GIVE EM HELL INDIANA JONES!
"presenting A adventure", what's up the Americans and not knowing when to use "A" and "An", come on, it's called AN adventure, cause the following word after AN starts with a vocal letter, in this cause Adventure, A, so embarrassing and annoying.
@@ncard00 Well, if you could read properly my presentations of the word “adventures” is not paired with “a” and “adventure” alone, but with a description. As shown, “a classic Indy adventure” “a new adventure” not just “a adventure” Plus how could you know I’m American? Besides straight accusation. I will agree though, in my memory of education I don’t think they taught us that. Or at least properly or long enough. My friend taught me that when we were young. Thank you for giving peeps an education lesson, though
It's similar to my dad. He's 74 now and pretty much still does the same stuff he had done for decades. There is a difference though, it's all done in shorter bursts now with longer resting periods. I would say it might be a case for Ford as well, he has enough energy to shoot a scene, but might need a longer break after. You can't beat the clock, but you can play around it.
I'm normally very picky about deaging, but this one looks really really good. I doubt they used AI alone, there's a lot of touch up by the artists for sure. If shown to anyone who doesnt know it's a new movie and all the AI stuff, no one would notice.
Yeah but the only flawed there is some scene where indy voice sounds really old in the deaging. I know it’s hard for Harrison to make his voice sounds like his younger self but overall a great effort he did
@@AustinGMRS Tbh I didn't notice. And I was looking for deaging problems that people said were there, but I couldn't see any, and as for his voice, I didn't know Harrison was using his own voice digitally unaltered so I wasn't listening for anything off there, but I didn't notice anyway. It was all really well done.
You never hear people mention James Mangold when listing the best directors but he should be right up there alongside the other greats. I can't think of another director other than Spielberg that has managed to have such a diverse filmography without sacrificing quality.
He is really good, don't know if I would put him quite at that level yet. However, that is an extreme amount of pressure to fill Spielberg's shoes, and he did an amazing job. It really was a fun Indy movie and Harrison Ford was fantastic.
Spielberg was executive producer and did (supposedly) provide a lot of feedback to help get his style right. George Lucas was also somewhere around as a producer, you can't make an Indiana movie without these two.
0:26 the great destroyer... Years we have fought it.. and years we have lost... Its consumed and petrified everything it touches.. there is little hope left..
"presenting A adventure", what's up the Americans and not knowing when to use "A" and "An", come on, it's called AN adventure, cause the following word after AN starts with a vocal letter, in this cause Adventure, A, so embarrassing and annoying.
Yes, but stop using the word amazing every Tom Dick and Harry out there uses the word amazing it needs to be put on the shelf for good, use another word
Im 26, i grew up with the original 3 due to my father been in his teens when the films came out, honestly my favourite adventure films truly in love with these films
Had this movie been sent back to the early 90s and my younger self watched this movie I would simply be impressed at the job they did making Harrison look older. I wouldn't question at all his younger scenes.
"presenting A adventure", what's up the Americans and not knowing when to use "A" and "An", come on, it's called AN adventure, cause the following word after AN starts with a vocal letter, in this cause Adventure, A, so embarrassing and annoying.
If you listen to the music played in the opening with younger indy, you can hear old sountracks for example from last crusade the theme of the tank fight. I was in tears when i heard it for the first time
I think in time this film would be appreciated for what it is, fun, entertaining and endearing. I hope it gathers money in time with home cinema rentals and good old DVD sales! Yes I still buy them!!! 😂
@@mrbear143 can you even spell it right? If you were a real fan you would appreciate this movie more than the last one. That's what I wanted, a better Indy film then crystal skull, and I got it
The beginning sequence was definitely the best part of the film. The cgi on Harrison to make him younger looked good, I just wish they would have tweaked his voice to give him a younger Harrison voice too.
This is the best movie he made,I love all his movies people say it was no good,but it was amazing ,in his movies he had different whips and hats,so I brought a hat whip and coat ,cost a lot but worth it
2:29 It's great to see that they didn't change the body proportions to slim him down, or fudge with the collar area, or replace the opening on his shirt. It's all Ford, as much as it can be before it breaks the illusion. Incredible use of Deepfakes, truly. This is an amazing use case to show it's future potential also.
1:41 If Indy was supposed to be 37 yrs old in 1944 that means the River Phoenix version of him in Last Crusade (in 1912) was supposed to 5 years old???
The audience score on RT is 88 percent. IF I were to take that face value more people loved it than not. The criticial score is 69 arrogate which is a fresh film on the site, again not a mark that shows it's terrible. So, I honestly don't get where these haters actually are. Everyone I know liked it and they did not like Kingdom of the Crystal Skull much. It seems the haters mostly exist on the internet. Myself, I am not saying it was a perfect movie, but I found it enjoyable, and it felt like Indy to me. It was a good way to end it.
I was sure they only used his CGI face attached to a younger body double but it seems he really did a lot of the acting with his own body. He's got great posture and movement for an 80 year old guy. Much better than DeNiro and Pesci in The Irishmen.
This movie is absolutely fantastic! I cannot believe the amount of negative reviews from sooo many toxic butt hurt SW fans out there... unreal. Dial of Destiny is a winner... too bad it didn't make back its near 500 million dollar budget. Disney is insane to have spent that much on this film buuuut the money shows. It is a gorgeous film.
While a few of the plot points, and especially the climax/ending still rubs me the wrong way for Harrison Ford’s *final* hurrah as the beloved character, I still enjoyed the film! Not going to lie, Helena and Teddy were kind of the movie’s biggest killjoy imo, but Harrison and the rest did an absolutely stellar performance!
Whew go there Harrison(Indy)like two movies in one CGI Indy to old Indy in one sitting .And that great scifi time travel end plot took a while to figure out how it affects end of movie.Great film.
I like to give all the credit to George lucas and the rest of the crew for working very hard on Indy . The effects were absolutely incredible. The cgi of seeing young Indy was so breathtaking. George lucas deserves the credit for that
George Lucas wasn’t involved in this film at all lol, what are you talking about? He was executive producer, which is another way of saying he made money on it, but had nothing to do with the creation process at all. This isn’t me trying to be a dick mind you, I’m literally just saying Lucas and Spielberg both had nothing to do with the film at all.
Bruah, if you’re going to post total garbage to earn you $, at least learn who the real producers are. GL and SS had NOTHING to do with this abomination.
I’ve become mixed on de-aging as this film and The Irishman made me realize that there are more things to consider when it comes to de-aging as you not only need to make your actor look young, but make them also sound, move and feel as young as they look. Now I’m split on casting younger actors or de-aging them, or a third one where you cast young actors and deepfake them with the original actors face
I liked the sequence but his face got so blurred out for me it was hard to look at sometimes. I actually like most of the movie more after the opening scene.
@@marthastubbs8321 Indy's movements were way better yes than in the Irishman but Indy's face to me was very badly done during some of the action scenes in the beginning.
The beginning segment was awesome and I would buy a dvd just of that alone , but after that it became disappointing, I won’t be adding this one to my collection, what a shame, it had so much potential.
I haven't actually seen this, partly because of the "wokification" -- The bits I've seen of the intro, although some of the de-aging looks pretty good, it does NOT look like it was shot in the 1980's. I looks overly processed, and sort of the cgi-snoozefest we've grown accustomed to in this day and age. Like when they were talking about doing a simply dolly track, and then switching to the over the top action, and showing this huge explosion behind a building. You could clearly see the explosion was either CG or just over processed until it looked cg. Back in the day they'd do things as practically as possible, sometimes with models, sometimes combined with matte paintings, occasionally a blue-screen shot. There's still something about the old optical effects and in-camera stuff that looks better than CG. Keep in mind that they're so good at CGI now, that they could really make it realistic probably if they approached it differently. But still most movies look sort of generic with CG. Doesn't really make me want to see it, even now. Even if the woke stuff wasn't bothersome, the filmmaking we do now, still kind of would.
The only bits that don't work are his face has slight things that are still off to be kinda uncanny valleyish but not too bad. But the main thing that doesn't work well is when he walks and such it is still an old man walk...lol
Probably the best de-aging effect ever done. If we didn't know who Harrison Ford was and were just shown the footage, I doubt we would question it being CGI altogether and just think it's some young dude.
This film more than made up for Crystal Skulls, and had a great villain played by a terrific actor, and the de-aging was amazing. I loved this movie! It was a proper send off to the character and franchise. Not to mention, the adventure, which is the most important part, was great! They nailed it!
It was great to see prime Indiana Jones again, of course once more in an impossible situation, about to be hanged in the first minute of a movie while things explode around him. LOL!!!
The film was formulaic in terms of its structure with its chase scenes and the villain getting hold of the McGuffin: the ending is what made this film for me and the realisation by the -Nazi- villain that he was NOT going back to 30’s Germany but where they end up IS incredible.
The film is decent and it serves quite excellent as a reference to all the previous ones! I've seen it twice in the cinema! We should be grateful to Harrison Ford for returning back as Indiana Jones for the very final time...!! In many aspects it is quite better than the "Kingdom of the Crystal Skull". An obvious downside: his age! Ford he is visibly older, because.... well, he is!! There's a gap of 15 years between the two films!! Nevertheless, he doesn't seem as an ordinary 80 years old person. He's quite fit and in shape, thus he's portraying the character with success, humor and decency!!!
This may have not been the greatest way to close the franchise, or the best movie... but it was really good, enjoyable and ofc, that first scene was AMAZING!, better that the Star Wars or Jurassic World ending, i really liked this movie.
To improve this franchise, 1) remove Kathleen Kennedy. 2) recast someone talented and in like with Ford. 3) Dive into Jones’ history for new stories. 4) Have someone passionate about the franchise work this. Spielberg wanted to do a James Bond style movie and Lucas wanted to model it after serials from the 30s & 40s. The documentaries for filming these movies were so great!
People say this was the weakest movie in the franchise but I enjoyed it and still love watching it. I took my daughter to see this and she said “Dad we are going on an Indy adventure together”
I did not enjoy this movie overall BUT that opening was fantastic. Harrison Ford really did give it his all and it shows. Loved this look behind the scenes showing what all went into this.
Harrison was around 49 when he shoot Indiana Jones and the Last crusade, so the actor should be 55 years old in 1944, but the character is 10 years younger than that. Mystery explained
The beginning was the best part for me. I loved the nods and hints of Spielberg influence thrown in. I liked the antagonist, I think he had a good arc and motive and I am a big fan of the actor.
Totally! Seeing "young" Indy again was magical.
@@gtuxgtuxHow do you feel about the worn out, old, beat to death Indy portrayed in the rest of the film?
Kind of sad. Mostly because it reminds you it's the end of an era.@@razorpit
@@razorpit I didn’t like the rest of the movie. I think it was ruined by introducing a new character because it’s a closing of a franchise, it should have returning characters and a new villain. The whole Helena character was pointless, and she was not only an unlikeable character but she had no meaning.
I think they made her unlikeable on purpose. She heavily reminds Indy of how his son became rebelious and how it got him killed which Indy blames himself for that, meanwhile Helena who's his goddaughter which he basically neglected went down a bad path after losing her father to his own madness, she tried to keep people away and just get money in order to "survive" as crooks tend to do. But in the end when Indy just wanted to give up completly and die in the past she couldn't let it happen again. I think that in the end she saved him from his past while he saved her too. I like it because it was intentional and also unlike other characters she wasn't a cliche of a smart researcher or anything.@@I_O246
I was so so SO impressed with the de-aging in this film. If I didn’t know how old Harrison Ford actually is, I wouldn’t have known the difference. How far the technology has come in so short a time! The only time I truly noticed any difference was when Indy was hanging from the rope - the rope looked weird, but not his face. Incredible work by the artists.
but the voice sounded like an 80 year old Harrison ford.
No it didnt! and it was a good movie!@@davinalopez-oz1ez
@@davinalopez-oz1ez I noticed that too, although cgi enhanced is look, his voice was not on point, and I get it, age never fails but they could have used some program or something else to improved it!
@@FabioMateus they did use voice de-aging. I saw a whole clip on it. But i guess it wasn't enough
Young indiana jones
I don't care what anyone says. I loved this movie!!
Stupid people, who haven't seen the film, had been just repeating what influencers say.
So did I. It's a thrilling ride from start to finish.
Yeah, so did I. So did a lot of people. The haters are a very loud minority online that are repeating a lot of copypasta over and over. I actually went into the film quite apprehensive because of all the crap that those people were saying, and came away very surprised. It's actually a hell of a lot of fun.
Most people hating on the movie haven't seen it and are just going off TH-camrs opinions.
Me too
The character is born in 1899 and the Prologue takes place in 1944 so he'd be 45 years old.
I'm glad someone said it! Depending on the month of course, since he was born in July - but yes we can agree he wouldn't have been 37.
That just shows how much the people behind this movie actually knows about Indy.
Born when Arthur Morgan died.
@@thebufoon don't even start 🥺
I guess they were talking about Harrison not Indy.
So he actually did those backflash scene ! I was almost convinced it was a body double with his face digitally glued on.
I'm fairly sure they used a body double for the most dynamic scenes. Ford really is in peak shape for an 80 year old - hell, for even a 60 year old - but he no longer moves like he did in his 40s...
Flashback lol
Honestly, some of the best de-aging I have ever seen. I really liked this movie, it bums me out that people tore it apart. It’s like my dad said when we went to see it. “what more could they have wanted, why isn’t that good enough?” (he put it in his top three of the series)
congratulation at all, this movie is pure garbage
What makes it "pure garbage?"
can you coherently explain why?@
For real i don't get the hate. Yea, it wasn't a perfect movie for sure, i surely could critize a lot, but i left the cinema with a smile on my face and a good memory, what more could i demand for the price of a movie ticket?
@@causti9744 Barbie RULES, i living in strange times
they nailed it i was 15 again watching the opening scenes
Oh man--should've done the whole movie with Harrison de-aged in the '40s!
Yeah, I kinda wish they did that too.
@@Plathismo The new indiana jones game is absolutely fantastic and feels exactly like this. The voice/performance actor nails it and the direction is perfect. Can't praise it high enough
that first 10 to 15 minutes was easily the best part of the movie
20
"presenting A adventure", what's up the Americans and not knowing when to use "A" and "An", come on, it's called AN adventure, cause the following word after AN starts with a vocal letter, in this cause Adventure, A, so embarrassing and annoying.
22@@clinicalpsychologist
Yep. Agreed. It dragged on and on as if nothing was edited out.
There were parts with young Indy where his mannerisms seemed pretty obviously older Harrison Ford -- the way he moves and acts has changed. That said, there were many moments that felt completely real, and overall that intro felt like a great Indy short-film all in itself. I'm glad the sequence was so long.
Any of the farther away shots were really great the upclose like pouring out the coffee was dead give away older Harrison
"presenting A adventure", what's up the Americans and not knowing when to use "A" and "An", come on, it's called AN adventure, cause the following word after AN starts with a vocal letter, in this cause Adventure, A, so embarrassing and annoying.
Harrison ford Young indiana jones 5
@@ncard00 what’re you yapping about
I’m not surprised at all at Harrison doing many of his physical acting, but God damn is it amazing to see him in action! Especially meant to be his 40 year old self! Still got that energy and you can tell, not only physical alone, but mental like when he talks about his voice
The first 20 minutes of this film clearly shows James Mangold, Harrison, and everyone got what it takes to make a classic Indy adventure in modern cinema. The rest of the film then shows that they could also do a new Indy adventure, and like what Harrison been saying “Tell a story about Indy that we think we’d never see.” I enjoyed this film. Showing the old Indy we know and love to an Indy we never expected. Life won’t always be in your favor, but you gotta keep going. GIVE EM HELL INDIANA JONES!
"presenting A adventure", what's up the Americans and not knowing when to use "A" and "An", come on, it's called AN adventure, cause the following word after AN starts with a vocal letter, in this cause Adventure, A, so embarrassing and annoying.
@@ncard00 Well, if you could read properly my presentations of the word “adventures” is not paired with “a” and “adventure” alone, but with a description. As shown, “a classic Indy adventure” “a new adventure” not just “a adventure”
Plus how could you know I’m American? Besides straight accusation. I will agree though, in my memory of education I don’t think they taught us that. Or at least properly or long enough. My friend taught me that when we were young. Thank you for giving peeps an education lesson, though
It's similar to my dad. He's 74 now and pretty much still does the same stuff he had done for decades. There is a difference though, it's all done in shorter bursts now with longer resting periods. I would say it might be a case for Ford as well, he has enough energy to shoot a scene, but might need a longer break after. You can't beat the clock, but you can play around it.
I love this series huge fan.
Harrison Ford did a wonderful job, i knew it was the technology, but he really sold young Indy to me.
I'm normally very picky about deaging, but this one looks really really good. I doubt they used AI alone, there's a lot of touch up by the artists for sure. If shown to anyone who doesnt know it's a new movie and all the AI stuff, no one would notice.
Yeah but the only flawed there is some scene where indy voice sounds really old in the deaging. I know it’s hard for Harrison to make his voice sounds like his younger self but overall a great effort he did
Its never just AI, also remember Mangold did the perfect deaging in Logan, years before, of course with a way less expressive character
@@AustinGMRS Tbh I didn't notice. And I was looking for deaging problems that people said were there, but I couldn't see any, and as for his voice, I didn't know Harrison was using his own voice digitally unaltered so I wasn't listening for anything off there, but I didn't notice anyway. It was all really well done.
@@AustinGMRS Couldn't they use technology to deage his voice as well? I mean, we now have AI that can imitate the voices of real-life people.
Except people know that Harrison ford is in his 70
You never hear people mention James Mangold when listing the best directors but he should be right up there alongside the other greats. I can't think of another director other than Spielberg that has managed to have such a diverse filmography without sacrificing quality.
He is really good, don't know if I would put him quite at that level yet. However, that is an extreme amount of pressure to fill Spielberg's shoes, and he did an amazing job. It really was a fun Indy movie and Harrison Ford was fantastic.
delusional
He’s a decent Director, but this last one deserves Spielberg to direct it
Spielberg was executive producer and did (supposedly) provide a lot of feedback to help get his style right.
George Lucas was also somewhere around as a producer, you can't make an Indiana movie without these two.
imagine if they put even half this much effort into the WRITING.
@@everdash exactly 😂
0:26 the great destroyer... Years we have fought it.. and years we have lost... Its consumed and petrified everything it touches.. there is little hope left..
I wish for a complete movie with the younger Indy. The feeling in the movie was amazing. Just like the old times ❤
"presenting A adventure", what's up the Americans and not knowing when to use "A" and "An", come on, it's called AN adventure, cause the following word after AN starts with a vocal letter, in this cause Adventure, A, so embarrassing and annoying.
Yes, but stop using the word amazing every Tom Dick and Harry out there uses the word amazing it needs to be put on the shelf for good, use another word
@@ncard00 stop with your spam
Im 26, i grew up with the original 3 due to my father been in his teens when the films came out, honestly my favourite adventure films truly in love with these films
Had this movie been sent back to the early 90s and my younger self watched this movie I would simply be impressed at the job they did making Harrison look older. I wouldn't question at all his younger scenes.
Mr Ford is the best adventure actor ever ,every film he made was GOLD
2:53 The PS2 Indy.
This film just feels authentically as classic as the other 3 indiana jones films.
"presenting A adventure", what's up the Americans and not knowing when to use "A" and "An", come on, it's called AN adventure, cause the following word after AN starts with a vocal letter, in this cause Adventure, A, so embarrassing and annoying.
@@ncard00 Please stop spamming.
nah
If you listen to the music played in the opening with younger indy, you can hear old sountracks for example from last crusade the theme of the tank fight. I was in tears when i heard it for the first time
Yep I noticed but I was not impressed by this movie at all, it’s the worst one out of the series
This movie blew me away on so many levels. I am old enough to have seen the episodes before this one when they came out.
This is how it's done.
I think in time this film would be appreciated for what it is, fun, entertaining and endearing. I hope it gathers money in time with home cinema rentals and good old DVD sales! Yes I still buy them!!! 😂
I know for sure I am buying it in 4K when it comes out, I loved it
The movie was non of those things. It was complete garbage and anyone who’s an actual fan of the Indian Jones franchise would agree with this fact.
@@mrbear143 can you even spell it right? If you were a real fan you would appreciate this movie more than the last one. That's what I wanted, a better Indy film then crystal skull, and I got it
He brought way more life to the character in this one
For Ford, only his reflection has changed..apart for this, he still has that middle aged energy in full.
This was done perfectly. Probably the first time I've seen it working so well.
I want to see more behind the scenes of Ford plying young Indy.
la settima arte il cinema, l'ottava arte : il tempo
e mi rispondo e metto mi piace da sola perche son troppo poetica
I’m 22 and the various Indiana jones music tracks was the best thing ever in my childhood.
I love this movie , love videos
The beginning sequence was definitely the best part of the film. The cgi on Harrison to make him younger looked good, I just wish they would have tweaked his voice to give him a younger Harrison voice too.
The first 20 minutes are the bomb!
the movie was excellent, and the VFX and CGI was amazing!
Indeed!
This is the best movie he made,I love all his movies people say it was no good,but it was amazing ,in his movies he had different whips and hats,so I brought a hat whip and coat ,cost a lot but worth it
Are you kidding me? It’s the worst one he made!
The movie was great. Thank's for that and Seeing young Harisson Ford again was magical. We want more Indian Jones
1:38? 37 years old in 1944/45? Really?
He would canonically be 45/46
2:29 It's great to see that they didn't change the body proportions to slim him down, or fudge with the collar area, or replace the opening on his shirt. It's all Ford, as much as it can be before it breaks the illusion. Incredible use of Deepfakes, truly. This is an amazing use case to show it's future potential also.
It is hard to believe Harrison is past 80 years old!
1:41 If Indy was supposed to be 37 yrs old in 1944 that means the River Phoenix version of him in Last Crusade (in 1912) was supposed to 5 years old???
I freaking knew that was the Wilhelm scream!
It was a great film despite the amount of crap it gets. I thoroughly enjoyed it and appreciate the effort put into it
The audience score on RT is 88 percent. IF I were to take that face value more people loved it than not. The criticial score is 69 arrogate which is a fresh film on the site, again not a mark that shows it's terrible. So, I honestly don't get where these haters actually are. Everyone I know liked it and they did not like Kingdom of the Crystal Skull much. It seems the haters mostly exist on the internet. Myself, I am not saying it was a perfect movie, but I found it enjoyable, and it felt like Indy to me. It was a good way to end it.
I was sure they only used his CGI face attached to a younger body double but it seems he really did a lot of the acting with his own body. He's got great posture and movement for an 80 year old guy. Much better than DeNiro and Pesci in The Irishmen.
I love every Indiana Jones movie
This movie is absolutely fantastic! I cannot believe the amount of negative reviews from sooo many toxic butt hurt SW fans out there... unreal. Dial of Destiny is a winner... too bad it didn't make back its near 500 million dollar budget. Disney is insane to have spent that much on this film buuuut the money shows. It is a gorgeous film.
Lovely movie. Great job. 😍😍😍😍
While a few of the plot points, and especially the climax/ending still rubs me the wrong way for Harrison Ford’s *final* hurrah as the beloved character, I still enjoyed the film!
Not going to lie, Helena and Teddy were kind of the movie’s biggest killjoy imo, but Harrison and the rest did an absolutely stellar performance!
i don't care what anybody says, i loved every indiana jones movie
I haven't got to see it yet!
This movie was amazing!
No it wasn’t. And stop using the word amazing, it’s been overused.
Indiana Jones will live forever: "The Fate of Atlantis", "The Infernal Machine", "The Emperor's Tomb" and "The Staff of Kings".
@@hector_st coming "the great circle".
Finally a good Indiana Jones movie again.
yes i love this movie too lol
I'm glad the ideas that used to give people like River Phoenix work are finally done by computers
Indiana Jones was born on July 1st, 1899; so he was 45 years old in Dial of Destiny.
I have enjoyed all the Indy movies and I especially liked how they portrayed a 78-80 year old Indy in Dail of Destiny.
Indy in 1969 had 70 years old (born in 1899)
Whew go there Harrison(Indy)like two movies in one CGI Indy to old Indy in one sitting .And that great scifi time travel end plot took a while to figure out how it affects end of movie.Great film.
0:26, the exterminator of dreams.
Cgi was good but i think the hair was too dark. Should have been light brown with speckles of grey in it at 45
I like to give all the credit to George lucas and the rest of the crew for working very hard on Indy . The effects were absolutely incredible. The cgi of seeing young Indy was so breathtaking. George lucas deserves the credit for that
George Lucas wasn’t involved in this film at all lol, what are you talking about? He was executive producer, which is another way of saying he made money on it, but had nothing to do with the creation process at all.
This isn’t me trying to be a dick mind you, I’m literally just saying Lucas and Spielberg both had nothing to do with the film at all.
Bruah, if you’re going to post total garbage to earn you $, at least learn who the real producers are. GL and SS had NOTHING to do with this abomination.
I’ve become mixed on de-aging as this film and The Irishman made me realize that there are more things to consider when it comes to de-aging as you not only need to make your actor look young, but make them also sound, move and feel as young as they look. Now I’m split on casting younger actors or de-aging them, or a third one where you cast young actors and deepfake them with the original actors face
I liked the sequence but his face got so blurred out for me it was hard to look at sometimes. I actually like most of the movie more after the opening scene.
@@mearndt1The CG for me either looked perfect, like a PS3 cutscene, or like a cutout
I didn't think DoD had any issues with Indy's movement in the same way Irishman had with De Niro tbh
@@marthastubbs8321 That is true
@@marthastubbs8321 Indy's movements were way better yes than in the Irishman but Indy's face to me was very badly done during some of the action scenes in the beginning.
The beginning segment was awesome and I would buy a dvd just of that alone , but after that it became disappointing, I won’t be adding this one to my collection, what a shame, it had so much potential.
I haven't actually seen this, partly because of the "wokification" -- The bits I've seen of the intro, although some of the de-aging looks pretty good, it does NOT look like it was shot in the 1980's. I looks overly processed, and sort of the cgi-snoozefest we've grown accustomed to in this day and age. Like when they were talking about doing a simply dolly track, and then switching to the over the top action, and showing this huge explosion behind a building. You could clearly see the explosion was either CG or just over processed until it looked cg. Back in the day they'd do things as practically as possible, sometimes with models, sometimes combined with matte paintings, occasionally a blue-screen shot. There's still something about the old optical effects and in-camera stuff that looks better than CG. Keep in mind that they're so good at CGI now, that they could really make it realistic probably if they approached it differently. But still most movies look sort of generic with CG. Doesn't really make me want to see it, even now. Even if the woke stuff wasn't bothersome, the filmmaking we do now, still kind of would.
The only bits that don't work are his face has slight things that are still off to be kinda uncanny valleyish but not too bad. But the main thing that doesn't work well is when he walks and such it is still an old man walk...lol
The movie as a whole I thought was fairly good, not that great but fairly good. But the beginning sequence was amazing, I absolutely loved that part!
Loved the movie!!!!!!
Probably the best de-aging effect ever done. If we didn't know who Harrison Ford was and were just shown the footage, I doubt we would question it being CGI altogether and just think it's some young dude.
This film more than made up for Crystal Skulls, and had a great villain played by a terrific actor, and the de-aging was amazing. I loved this movie! It was a proper send off to the character and franchise. Not to mention, the adventure, which is the most important part, was great! They nailed it!
if you leave 3/4 of the way to the end, silly ending somewhat ruined the film. first act the best.
Nah Crystal Skull was better and had a WAY better ending.
@@manuelk1853agreed!
Out of all the Indiana Jones movies this is the worst one. And it dragged on for too long even kingdom of the crystal skull was better than this.
And please, stop using the word amazing, it’s been overused
This was actually a really awesome movie
Indiana Jones fez e faz parte da minha vida desde os meus 5 anos de idade
foi uma honra assistir todos os filmes várias e várias vezes
Sad that with all this talent, they couldn't make a good movie. 😥
See yourself out.
I love it when people say 'i don't care what people think' but then give their opinion like it matters to others! 😂
It was great to see prime Indiana Jones again, of course once more in an impossible situation, about to be hanged in the first minute of a movie while things explode around him. LOL!!!
The film was formulaic in terms of its structure with its chase scenes and the villain getting hold of the McGuffin: the ending is what made this film for me and the realisation by the -Nazi- villain that he was NOT going back to 30’s Germany but where they end up IS incredible.
Great movie!
i just wanna say ,Love you Indy!!!!!
The 1944 part was the best part of the movie.
❤❤❤❤❤❤ love it. I watched it a few minutes ago
The film is decent and it serves quite excellent as a reference to all the previous ones! I've seen it twice in the cinema! We should be grateful to Harrison Ford for returning back as Indiana Jones for the very final time...!! In many aspects it is quite better than the "Kingdom of the Crystal Skull". An obvious downside: his age! Ford he is visibly older, because.... well, he is!! There's a gap of 15 years between the two films!! Nevertheless, he doesn't seem as an ordinary 80 years old person. He's quite fit and in shape, thus he's portraying the character with success, humor and decency!!!
I really enjoyed it, and he was so good at his age as Indy again. I can't wait to own it.
1:26 now we know how we got the Lucasfilm variant
it was great I found the biggest giveaway when Young Indiana was on screen was the old man voice
Oh, my God! Young Indi was created by CGI. Very fantastic!!
This may have not been the greatest way to close the franchise, or the best movie... but it was really good, enjoyable and ofc, that first scene was AMAZING!, better that the Star Wars or Jurassic World ending, i really liked this movie.
Cuando le ponen corazón al CGI es magnífico el resultado.
Thanks for your unconditional love and support,where are you located from
I loved this movie it felt like a parody of the older ones.
Def's AI, but i'm still here for it. Respect to Harrison for having the passion and drive to create this.
Amazing movie and you would never guess that Spielberg did not direct it. It feels so much like the old movies.
1944, Indiana Jones would have been 45 years old, not in his 30s. 1:39
now we got the game!
To improve this franchise, 1) remove Kathleen Kennedy. 2) recast someone talented and in like with Ford. 3) Dive into Jones’ history for new stories. 4) Have someone passionate about the franchise work this. Spielberg wanted to do a James Bond style movie and Lucas wanted to model it after serials from the 30s & 40s. The documentaries for filming these movies were so great!
The Indiana Jones movie squeal 6 should focus on Harrison Ford 🎉 being so understanding to people
Harrison with the black dots on his face looks better than some of the de-aged shots! haha
Man, sounds like they shouldve just made a young indiana jones adventure
People say this was the weakest movie in the franchise but I enjoyed it and still love watching it. I took my daughter to see this and she said “Dad we are going on an Indy adventure together”
I did not enjoy this movie overall BUT that opening was fantastic. Harrison Ford really did give it his all and it shows. Loved this look behind the scenes showing what all went into this.
Harrison was around 49 when he shoot Indiana Jones and the Last crusade, so the actor should be 55 years old in 1944, but the character is 10 years younger than that. Mystery explained
I enjoyed the movie. I love the beginning sequence. Amazing. A lot better then Crystal Skull. Should of been the box office hit it never was.
Story is also important, as well as having likeable "co-stars"