That's largely inaccessible though that's changing with climate. Currently almost all the worlds icebreaker ships that can navigate those waters to a certain extent are russian... I think America might have like one and it's utilised as a research vessel.
*Thanks for keeping us updated! I feel sympathy and empathy for our country. low income people are suffering to survive, and I appreciate Amanda. You've helped my family with your advice. imagine investing $30,000 and receiving $95,460 after 28 days of trading*
I began investing in stocks and Def earlier this year, and it is the best choice l've ever made. My portfolio is rounding up to almost a million, and I have realized that when a stock makes it to the news. Chances are you're quite late to the party, the idea is to get in early on blue chips before it becomes public. There are lots of life changing opportunities in the market, and maximize it
USA currently have 2 icebreaker USCGC Polar Star (WAGB-10), USCGC Polar Sea (WAGB-11) Russia has 7 nuclear powered icebreaker Taymyr, Vaygach, Yamal, 50 Let Pobedy, Arktika, Sibir, Ural. So how can you fight when you cant even reach ?
@@jimmytimmy3680 Then don't vote Republican. Every demo president since Clinton, who paid it all off, has had to fight to reduce the deficit that Repubs keep blowing up and then blaming Democrats. Regan, "Deficits don't matter" started it and it goes on.
Two things can be true at the same time, while what you're saying is true (you're referring to America, ofc), the same, or worse can be said about the Russians.
A defensive alliance is just that. Anyone who is jealous is undoubtedly wishing that their expansion efforts wouldn't be thwarted by a joint defensive treaty.
What is he talking about illegal war? Did he not remember the last 20 years of illegal invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan by the US? He has to have a brain at least ffs
Afghan was not illegal, but anyway, the US made some boo-boos in Iraq, how does that make it okay for Russia to invade their neighbour? Whataboutism much?
As always is goes something like...democracy something something human rights something something it doesn't apply to us something something freedom something something
The largest problem for NATO is at the political level… Russia’s war in Ukraine has highlighted the difficulty in getting politicians to agree on the degree of support and aid in a conflict that has direct influence on the safety of NATO
@@Memovox Do you mean this quote: ‘our way is the way of security and peace. That is our goal. It is peace and security that all our efforts are directed in the work of this Atlantic Council’
Please pass the AI reasoning on to Emergency Preparedness committees... META AI estimates probability of nuclear war at 10 to 20%, more than enough risk to trigger emergency preparedness... "Assessing the probability of nuclear war is a complex task, as it depends on various factors such as geopolitical tensions, diplomatic efforts, and strategic decision-making. However, considering the history of warfare and military weapons, I can provide some context and insights: - Historical precedent: Nuclear weapons have been used twice in history (Hiroshima and Nagasaki), and since then, there have been close calls and crises, but nuclear war has been avoided. - Current tensions: Ongoing geopolitical rivalries, regional conflicts, and nuclear proliferation concerns (e.g., North Korea, Iran) increase the risk of nuclear conflict. - Deterrence: The concept of mutually assured destruction (MAD) has so far served as a deterrent, as nations understand the devastating consequences of nuclear war. - Diplomacy and international efforts: Various treaties, organizations (e.g., IAEA), and diplomatic initiatives aim to prevent nuclear conflict and promote disarmament. - Probability estimate: Given these factors, I'd estimate the probability of nuclear war in the near future (next 10-20 years) as low to moderate, around 10-20%. However, this is a rough estimate and subject to change based on evolving geopolitical circumstances. Keep in mind that even a low probability doesn't negate the need for continued diplomatic efforts and international cooperation to reduce the risk of nuclear conflict."
@@edc1569 Two Russians out for a walk in the countryside one day. The year is 2030. As Dmitri and Ivan are walking, Dmitri says, “Hey, do you remember back in 2024 how we said China would never invade Russia?” Then they cross the Chinese border into Finland. Chinese 'historical lands', Vladivostok is 'Chinese forever'
@@pranavkumar3782 👈🏻 This guy supports a country that attacks children's hospitals with multi-million dollar missiles because they can't win their 865 day long 10 day 'SMO' against Ukraine. How desperate and pathetic Russia and its supporters have become.
@@claus-not-santa Oh sorry my mistake. It must have been a 3 week plan then? No, no, wait a minute, perhaps it was a 3 month plan? No, no, wait a minute, it must have been a 3 year plan? No, no, I know. It must have been a 3 decade plan then little cope botski? You cope bot 🤡's are so funny 😂🤣
Your mandate must be expanded to incorporate Ukraine army, navy and air force of drones. Particularly the drones that partially make your navies obsolete or vulnerable. Canada's Artic First Nations and Rangers should learn the drones and expand their 50 billion dollar economy to 100 billion alongside the navies with indigenous wind powered hydrogen generation and hydrogen as energy. Your mandate should expand to maritime use of hydrogen. YOU SHOULD SPEND TIME WITH ARTIC FIRST NATIONS, your eyes and ears. Get navy chefs to adopt and adapt local Arctic seafood and traditional food. AI says there's a 10 to 20 % chance of nuclear war and that's enough to trigger Emergency Preparedness for the Artic. That includes the foregoing. Meet Balsillie, MDA Space and satellite providers, including Elon. Check The North America Drought Atlas. It says droughts and floods were worse prior to 1900s. First Nations complained loss of ice roads so Dronamics and cargo drones needed for your command. You may have been a brilliant bureaucrat but now you need to expand your mandate due to changed circumstances. Thank you.
Canada really needs to dramatically step up it's arctic presence. A small handful of Dewolf class arctic support ships isn't going to cut it. We need at least 20 times this amount
@@edc1569 Closing the Arctic gate. Will be very difficult to travel thru radioactive ice(since there is no land mass) and quite dangerous for subs too. I've seen once a documentary about it. Things can go pretty crazy there. But I presume Americans will do something only if they consider a security issue happening. So doesn't really matter how many nuclear icebreakers Russians move there or how many bases they make, they're just in a very bad position anyhow the cards will draw.
"Indo Pacific" is a geopolitical term create by QUAD member Japan. --> to delete Asia --> to Indicate QUAD ru1e over the region , include Asia. Asian call our place "Asia Pacific"
Lol, Russia owns 51% of the coast in the arctic circle, are you going to defend that?
That's largely inaccessible though that's changing with climate.
Currently almost all the worlds icebreaker ships that can navigate those waters to a certain extent are russian... I think America might have like one and it's utilised as a research vessel.
Russia /China relationship is a challenge to NATO but NATO with a 32 countries alliance is expected to be accepted by Russia and China...Hypocrites 😂😂
Russia and China has no business with that 32 country alliance if they don't intend to invade those countries.
I need to go to the bathroom
ok canada. just remember to wash your hands.
Ok you're excused Canada, don't take too long ok lil bud
@@IK_MK lol
What you mean defending? It’s not yours.
*Thanks for keeping us updated! I feel sympathy and empathy for our country. low income people are suffering to survive, and I appreciate Amanda. You've helped my family with your advice. imagine investing $30,000 and receiving $95,460 after 28 days of trading*
I began investing in stocks and Def earlier this year, and it is the best choice l've ever made. My portfolio is rounding up to almost a million, and I have realized that when a stock makes it to the news. Chances are you're quite late to the party, the idea is to get in early on blue chips before it becomes public. There are lots of life changing opportunities in the market, and maximize it
What opportunities are there in the market, and how do I profit from it?
You can make a lot of money from the market regardless of whether it strengthens or crashes. The key is to be well positioned.
I would really like to know how this actually works.
All you need is a good capital, and the service of a professional broker, with those your investment will most certainly produce high yields.
USA currently have 2 icebreaker USCGC Polar Star (WAGB-10), USCGC Polar Sea (WAGB-11) Russia has 7 nuclear powered icebreaker Taymyr, Vaygach, Yamal, 50 Let Pobedy, Arktika, Sibir, Ural. So how can you fight when you cant even reach ?
have you ever heard of airplanes - the icebreakers are only needed for exploitation
@@cc-qk8qh Wrong. They are needed to keep the Arctic Silk Road open for business.
Do you need Icebreakers to have supremacy in a melting sea?? The US still has planes and canada as the land to support them
Alaska fishing industry has a decent icebreaker fleet
The melted arctic is very lucrative!
US already have 800 military bases in the world. Now with the opening of Arctic, they will have to add 300 more bases.
Not possible with 2030 50 Trillion debt.😂
@@jimmytimmy3680 Then don't vote Republican. Every demo president since Clinton, who paid it all off, has had to fight to reduce the deficit that Repubs keep blowing up and then blaming Democrats. Regan, "Deficits don't matter" started it and it goes on.
Your problem is you think you own everything
Two things can be true at the same time, while what you're saying is true (you're referring to America, ofc), the same, or worse can be said about the Russians.
@@rebjorn79 USA is the worst
They are securing the important global trading routes around the world so you can get a cheaper importable products
A defensive alliance is just that. Anyone who is jealous is undoubtedly wishing that their expansion efforts wouldn't be thwarted by a joint defensive treaty.
The actions of the so called defensive all is provocative. You must remember that rivals of the global power must respond to every action.
What is he talking about illegal war? Did he not remember the last 20 years of illegal invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan by the US? He has to have a brain at least ffs
And many more
Afghan was not illegal, but anyway, the US made some boo-boos in Iraq, how does that make it okay for Russia to invade their neighbour? Whataboutism much?
I'm not used to seeing US Navy officers in "woodland camouflage", but it looks good.
Haha. They can’t defend their own border.
so to sum it up: NATO will fight Russia for the Arctic passage and any resources to be found there, great, another conflict, just what we need🤦♀
Nato defensive alliance?imperialist alliance
Sure pal, like napoleon, or ‘the Brits’, Genghis khan, or something.
@@edc1569NATO is worldwide greatest terror organisation!
Wrong question Can Nato able to defend red Sea🌊 against a non state group houthis 🤣🤣🤣 forgot about arctic 🤷♂️
What NATO has to do in Red Sea?
@claus-notfreedom of navigation.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🥵-santa
@@PeterLamin-pi6rvIs this a member of NATO?
Loool😂😂
We Pakistani stand wt Russia against imperial colonial wester power
Weird how Russia is the one who is attacking another sovereign nation over imperial colonial ambitions.
What’s you beef about?
But you guys stand with china?? Ok
Good man. I feel myself in good hands with such admirals in Nato.
The nuclear war film Threads(1984) was a warning and it’s happening right now.
Spitzbergen belongs to Russia and its not a territory of norway!
Russia gets nothing
No-one seems to think so, not even Russia. You're an oddling all right.
@@peabase most of the population is Russian in Spitzbergen, I think it's the point what he talking about
@@peabase a bot
Lets them try to get that back via military means. If they already are in a standstill in Ukraine is it not really gonna go well for Russia
Another bs as usual
Ah yes the wonderful country of Finmark
I like listening to American generals. Most are very competent. But this one, he doesn't inspire confidence,
Probably just a poor communicator
@@TS-jw4gi Not exactly a good quality for a leader of men.
Russia does not abide by any law; got it
I want the Design on that Plate on the shelf
He can't even explain himself because of the baseless argument
As always is goes something like...democracy something something human rights something something it doesn't apply to us something something freedom something something
The largest problem for NATO is at the political level… Russia’s war in Ukraine has highlighted the difficulty in getting politicians to agree on the degree of support and aid in a conflict that has direct influence on the safety of NATO
Orban went China was received, but recently visited geman foreign minister was received by a bureacrat😂😂😂😂
NATO is not defensive.
Can you explain your point?
@@yanivandesompele3413 Lord Ismay's on the purpose of NATO quote explains it quite well. Look it up.
When was the last NATO war of expansion?
@@masterchinese28 Ukraine.
@@Memovox Do you mean this quote: ‘our way is the way of security and peace. That is our goal. It is peace and security that all our efforts are directed in the work of this Atlantic Council’
Headline should have read, "can NATO dominate the Artic"
Why NATO has to dominate Arctic?
@@claus-not-santa I am just trying to call out their nefarious use of the world "defense".
Hahaha funny boy 👦 talking what he learned from western politicians and media 😅😅 only
Please pass the AI reasoning on to Emergency Preparedness committees...
META AI estimates probability of nuclear war at 10 to 20%, more than enough risk to trigger emergency preparedness...
"Assessing the probability of nuclear war is a complex task, as it depends on various factors such as geopolitical tensions, diplomatic efforts, and strategic decision-making. However, considering the history of warfare and military weapons, I can provide some context and insights:
- Historical precedent: Nuclear weapons have been used twice in history (Hiroshima and Nagasaki), and since then, there have been close calls and crises, but nuclear war has been avoided.
- Current tensions: Ongoing geopolitical rivalries, regional conflicts, and nuclear proliferation concerns (e.g., North Korea, Iran) increase the risk of nuclear conflict.
- Deterrence: The concept of mutually assured destruction (MAD) has so far served as a deterrent, as nations understand the devastating consequences of nuclear war.
- Diplomacy and international efforts: Various treaties, organizations (e.g., IAEA), and diplomatic initiatives aim to prevent nuclear conflict and promote disarmament.
- Probability estimate: Given these factors, I'd estimate the probability of nuclear war in the near future (next 10-20 years) as low to moderate, around 10-20%. However, this is a rough estimate and subject to change based on evolving geopolitical circumstances.
Keep in mind that even a low probability doesn't negate the need for continued diplomatic efforts and international cooperation to reduce the risk of nuclear conflict."
How can they defend the artic when they can not even defend Nordstream 2 and the environmental disaster which no one wants to talks about
Long Live NATO 💪🇺🇸
troll
nato is a joke ask the taliban
Can't even beat the Taliban 😂😂😂
@@PeterLamin-pi6rv and 1.000 Houthis 😄
@@PeterLamin-pi6rv Hollywood army most overated in the world
Blah blah more blah with this 🤡
Defend?? Or conquer?
❤ Russia and China
🇨🇳🇷🇺🌈
Lol
Troll muppets
Best buddy’s, what principles do they stand by, cos I though China was against invading countries, that’s what they keep telling me here.
@@edc1569
Two Russians out for a walk in the countryside one day. The year is 2030. As Dmitri and Ivan are walking, Dmitri says, “Hey, do you remember back in 2024 how we said China would never invade Russia?” Then they cross the Chinese border into Finland.
Chinese 'historical lands', Vladivostok is 'Chinese forever'
The US should leave NATO
Why
So what's the weather like in Russia
Troll
NO NATO - NO USA
@@CharlesHallESP Why not?
US military hegemony.
Can't defend the US Congress JAN 6 😂😂😂😂
Long live Russia 🪆
Long live Pakistan
@@pranavkumar3782
Kyiv in 3 days Russian bot pretending to be Pakistani 😂
@@FishandHuntOne more Clown with these wonderful 3 days!
Who?
Where?
When?
@@FishandHunt man I am from Pakistan not a Russian bot
@@pranavkumar3782 👈🏻 This guy supports a country that attacks children's hospitals with multi-million dollar missiles because they can't win their 865 day long 10 day 'SMO' against Ukraine.
How desperate and pathetic Russia and its supporters have become.
@@claus-not-santa
Oh sorry my mistake.
It must have been a 3 week plan then?
No, no, wait a minute, perhaps it was a 3 month plan?
No, no, wait a minute, it must have been a 3 year plan?
No, no, I know. It must have been a 3 decade plan then little cope botski?
You cope bot 🤡's are so funny 😂🤣
NATO vs SCO
Sorry NATO, you are late! The Arctic belongs to someone more powerful. Soon the Antarctica will follow.
Release pm Imran Khan ❤
Don't disturb him software update is being started 😂😂
Who cares about 3rd world underdeveloped 🇵🇰
Arctic is not part of the the mandate. Do they seriously not understand what NATO stands for? Arctic isn't in the description. Small hint.
USA, Canada, Russia, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Iceland and Greenland are part of the arctic circle.
Your mandate must be expanded to incorporate Ukraine army, navy and air force of drones. Particularly the drones that partially make your navies obsolete or vulnerable. Canada's Artic First Nations and Rangers should learn the drones and expand their 50 billion dollar economy to 100 billion alongside the navies with indigenous wind powered hydrogen generation and hydrogen as energy. Your mandate should expand to maritime use of hydrogen. YOU SHOULD SPEND TIME WITH ARTIC FIRST NATIONS, your eyes and ears. Get navy chefs to adopt and adapt local Arctic seafood and traditional food. AI says there's a 10 to 20 % chance of nuclear war and that's enough to trigger Emergency Preparedness for the Artic. That includes the foregoing. Meet Balsillie, MDA Space and satellite providers, including Elon. Check The North America Drought Atlas. It says droughts and floods were worse prior to 1900s. First Nations complained loss of ice roads so Dronamics and cargo drones needed for your command. You may have been a brilliant bureaucrat but now you need to expand your mandate due to changed circumstances. Thank you.
nato biggest arms dealer
Answer is no….
@nsa
NATO is a banana army😂😂😂
Canada really needs to dramatically step up it's arctic presence. A small handful of Dewolf class arctic support ships isn't going to cut it. We need at least 20 times this amount
VADM Perry comes across as a dolt. Maybe he was just nervous?
Like NATO owns the Arctic Sea…..it doesn’t. Russia has more claim to it than most.
We're all going to die 😅
@@BrandyHeng007 death is inevitable
@@6figureetal💯
don't be ridiculous
Go outside and get some fresh air. Obviously, you are watching too much internet news.
Essentially, he is saying they may nuke the Arctic with basically no remorse if Russians and Chinese cross the line too much. Welp.
What would nuking the arctic achieve? I know Russians like to go on about nukes a lot, but what’s the tactical benefit?
@@edc1569 Closing the Arctic gate. Will be very difficult to travel thru radioactive ice(since there is no land mass) and quite dangerous for subs too. I've seen once a documentary about it. Things can go pretty crazy there. But I presume Americans will do something only if they consider a security issue happening. So doesn't really matter how many nuclear icebreakers Russians move there or how many bases they make, they're just in a very bad position anyhow the cards will draw.
There are huge oil resources, nobody will nuke anything in the Arctic.
🇺🇸🇺🇦❤🤍💙💛🌹🇮🇱🤍💙
The reality is NATO is under the US Israel management 😂😂
"Indo Pacific" is a geopolitical term create by QUAD member Japan.
--> to delete Asia
--> to Indicate QUAD ru1e over the region , include Asia.
Asian call our place "Asia Pacific"
🤧🤧🤧🤧🤧🤧🤧🤧🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡