15 MOST Advanced NATO Weapons

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 180

  • @voidofhope6259
    @voidofhope6259 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    That Leopard 2A7+ is a badass tank

  • @Leopez02
    @Leopez02 2 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    I like that Leopard TANK it Looks Awesome and The name IS cool. B2 Spirit IS great weapon plane. PS Im from in Finland and we are joining Nato. 🇫🇮

    • @thvndablvnt1877
      @thvndablvnt1877 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yup, after years of boasting your independence from NATO. You now get to join with out paying any of the fees that allied countries have paid for more than 60 years.

    • @Vile_Entity_3545
      @Vile_Entity_3545 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your politicians are stupid. You had a good relationship with Russia. Now they are going to put nukes on your borders. Brainless ignorant fools.

    • @brookebutler4675
      @brookebutler4675 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Good for you

    • @Leopez02
      @Leopez02 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@brookebutler4675 yep, it's awesome and safe live here :)

    • @terrysmith3808
      @terrysmith3808 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      If your excepted within a reasonable time? Looks like it takes years to be expected in? Good luck on that. If they except you?

  • @heatherfisher9959
    @heatherfisher9959 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    My parents and my grandfather built the very first B-2 Bomber at Northrop, in Orange county California. They have officially signed notes of thanks from the president. I had a huge poster of it when I was 10 from actually Northrop. Only place it could be purchased. I held on to it up till about 5 years ago to a long time service vet. He helped us move out 5th will to where we live now. His side job. Before he left I gave him my poster. Turns out he collects this stuff. It was rough around the edges but he was excited. Only so many existed. He said he will fix it. I waited all my life to give it to the right person. I am glad one came.

    • @malibu13203
      @malibu13203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Awesome story. My grandpa and “uncle” (my grandpas best friend for life) worked at Hydrulic Research in Burbank and developed parts for the Saturn V rockets

    • @malibu13203
      @malibu13203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I know they developed and did something with the servos, that’s it

    • @heatherfisher9959
      @heatherfisher9959 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My Grandma retired from Hughs Air Craft as well. But as things got a bit rough in the industries my parents got laid off in 1990 and we moved on but it was a good place to work with good benefit.

    • @robertaltmanaltman7619
      @robertaltmanaltman7619 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I just lost an uncle who was an engineer on the B2, and I'm proud of him too

    • @malibu13203
      @malibu13203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@robertaltmanaltman7619 I live 15 minutes from Whiteman. I see them almost daily.

  • @argiebarge7955
    @argiebarge7955 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    himars and javelin for sure, game changers

  • @MrCooper83
    @MrCooper83 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I saw the B2 and F117 first when I was kid. There was an AF not far where we lived and watching those planes were just unbelievable! As a kid I thought its a space ship. (I saw like 10)

  • @simonejassmann7743
    @simonejassmann7743 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome documentary thanks

  • @al1383
    @al1383 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Satellites IMO are the most useful weapons during a war.

    • @argiebarge7955
      @argiebarge7955 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      and probably any anti satellite measures, i imagine that will get messy

  • @ANDREWISNTSOGOODER
    @ANDREWISNTSOGOODER 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    13:00 , Imma correct you right there, the he called it the apache gunship, however, the apache is an attack helicopter, gunships are something completely different, attack helicopters are meant to target tanks and armored targets, gunships however are meant for infantry, attack heli's usually have so AGM's, an mg, etc, gunships however are like the air cavalry you think of when you think of Vietnam [war], except the gunners don't get off, and the helicopter is armed with an mg (copilot controlled and the 2 others)

  • @johnmorehead5008
    @johnmorehead5008 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That thing was loud as hell. On take off it sounded like 200 lawnmower engines taking off.

  • @Hugo-BB
    @Hugo-BB 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I say there needs to be a new revolution to make our enimies even more scared than before.

  • @RFGfotografie
    @RFGfotografie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey there is Himars again :P

  • @markcasey7182
    @markcasey7182 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I really wish that people would remember that the Apache helicopter was designed and built by McDonnell Douglas. And that due to improper leadership was acquired by Boeing. Douglas always had the better designed equipment. John McDonnell the 4th signed a bad deal with the Air Force for the C-17 and wasted lots of money trying to develop a plane the ran with a jet engine on one side and turbo prop on the other. We were proud to work there, and was very unhappy with our leadership.

    • @rayjames6096
      @rayjames6096 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Apache was designed and developed by Hughes Helicopter. HH also produced it until 1984 when MD bought HH.

  • @KingZE-V88
    @KingZE-V88 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great weapons

  • @wicked-w7l
    @wicked-w7l 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    how do you call a very basic bomber more advanced than a f-35, and why was the f-22 not on this?

    • @jackhammer111
      @jackhammer111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It was a rediculous choice. Likely just bait to get us to comment. I didn't give the vid a thumbs up.

  • @sethkaicer319
    @sethkaicer319 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Chris Kane introduced NATO to the woke mob.

  • @ldh9440
    @ldh9440 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Don’t think the harpoon should be on this list. Isn’t that being phased out shortly and being replaced with JASM.

  • @SteifWood
    @SteifWood 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Where are the NASAMS?

  • @atharvdwivedi3843
    @atharvdwivedi3843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No Rafale.... Not expected bruh

  • @gametime1247
    @gametime1247 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Where is the f22 America is a part of nato so it is a nato weapon

  • @shawnwatson1419
    @shawnwatson1419 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    NATO weapons are mainly from the US.

    • @jaziejay1
      @jaziejay1 ปีที่แล้ว

      NLAW UK Sweeden best missile system is Norway Astute sub UK also Challanger 2 UK US has most weapons as larger Army but not the best they thought that in the cold war also and UK shoed the US how easy it would be to nuke them th-cam.com/video/-Wx6npt421c/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=MarkFeltonProductions

  • @HisHonorable
    @HisHonorable ปีที่แล้ว

    Dwelling on the defense of civilians advances the art of weaponry, because everything already works.

  • @hykepark4480
    @hykepark4480 ปีที่แล้ว

    the research on this site must have been done over 5 years ago

  • @Simon89Jeppesen
    @Simon89Jeppesen 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As technology develops, technology itself is also the weakness as the gps and satellite systems..

  • @sierranexi
    @sierranexi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Me watching $1.5 million missiles being launched: 😶bye...

  • @techtitanuk5609
    @techtitanuk5609 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why do missiles cost so much

    • @TitusMH
      @TitusMH ปีที่แล้ว

      Are tax dollars pay for them😂

  • @Voiceovertehe
    @Voiceovertehe 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know the voice of the guy from Simple History lol 🙌🏼

  • @Scottoest
    @Scottoest ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I feel like titling this "most advanced" is a bit of a misnomer. A bunch of these are stalwarts of the USAF and Europe but I wouldn't exactly call the Stratofortress or Apache "advanced" in 2022, and the Eurofighter Typhoon isn't even a fifth-generation fighter jet lol.

    • @johnbattle7518
      @johnbattle7518 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's as advanced as anything g the enemy has. The weapons are extremely expensive to not only engineer but to build. Most cou tries will have these type of weapons for decades before they are replaced. So they are advanced with the latest upgrades until someone else creates something newer and deadlier

  • @UnicornMeat512
    @UnicornMeat512 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Himars is just getting a lot of press lately. It's actually about to be replaced.

    • @techtitanuk5609
      @techtitanuk5609 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      With what?

    • @Likeaworm
      @Likeaworm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They are getting the lrhw, long range hypersonic weapon. It’s a boost glide vehicle with a predicted range of 1500-2000 miles. The US military is shifting doctrine to fit the pacific theater so expect some crazy long range precision weapons in the future.

  • @sydclark5581
    @sydclark5581 ปีที่แล้ว

    This isn't NATO weapons, these are weapons individual NATO coutries have

  • @CtrlOptDel
    @CtrlOptDel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The F-35 wasn’t just developed for the US military, it’s 15% British designed & British made, incorporating technology from the speculative Harrier III concept.

    • @johnbattle7518
      @johnbattle7518 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lol, you again. Where are those sources?

    • @johnbattle7518
      @johnbattle7518 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      BTW, it's an American jet. We just allowed you to join in. Not even a quarter of the jet was developed by the UK

    • @CtrlOptDel
      @CtrlOptDel ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@johnbattle7518 The sources are what the people actually making it say themselves.

    • @CtrlOptDel
      @CtrlOptDel ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@johnbattle7518 “we just allowed you to join in”? 🤣 You seriously think the US military-industrial complex would willingly outsource *anything* they didn’t have to? There is *nothing* altruistic about this situation. That 15% is British because the US either couldn’t make it at all, or at least couldn’t make it to the required standard and/or cheaply enough.

    • @johnbattle7518
      @johnbattle7518 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Dalex Horizon You're stated we got thevUK to make 15% because we couldn't do it. That's the source I want. This whole video is American made tech, but we can't do 15% of our own jet. Where are the sources that say we can't?????

  • @stevenask1964
    @stevenask1964 ปีที่แล้ว

    How'd they get Charlie Sheen to narrate this?

  • @kylietravers3466
    @kylietravers3466 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Uhh the u.k. has the F-35B for the Air Force and navy also the b-52H will be still in service until beyond 2500

  • @mattia8327
    @mattia8327 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There is so much missing which really tells u just how powerful NATO is. And if u consider that the EU has just reached the 2% of GDP figure, there will be a lot more coming.
    You should have included
    F22
    Rafael
    F16
    F15
    Awacs planes, like the italian one or the US ones
    Osprey
    Centauro and stryker
    Bergamini, horizon, type 26 and 45, nimitz/Gerald r ford carriers, u212 (german submarines)

    • @johnbattle7518
      @johnbattle7518 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, most of Europe still is below the 2%

  • @rv1251
    @rv1251 ปีที่แล้ว

    F16 is missing here id say

  • @omegapointil5741
    @omegapointil5741 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It'd be easy to take out Putin.

  • @jayanttewari8227
    @jayanttewari8227 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Europe is advanced continent of the world and super power also. Rest are burning birds .

  • @jaketouchet9952
    @jaketouchet9952 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bro should’ve just said the U.S 💀

    • @johnbattle7518
      @johnbattle7518 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pretty much most of Europe are moochers

  • @JoelSalazarM
    @JoelSalazarM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are they in order? No way HIMARS are more advanced than an F35.

  • @BardiPar
    @BardiPar ปีที่แล้ว

    You underestimated F35, B2 and beside tanks are no longer efficient like before

    • @maxfreezy5124
      @maxfreezy5124 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ya it is easy to underestimate F35 if you just look at the stats like the speed and so on. Because of its technology it should be on rank 1

    • @viljosalminen9417
      @viljosalminen9417 ปีที่แล้ว

      F-22 is the most advanced weapon system that has been revealed if we talk about weapons that some NATO country has.

  • @sophiecepeda9744
    @sophiecepeda9744 ปีที่แล้ว

    So the Eurofighter is more advanced than the F-22? lol 🤣🤣

  • @macewindu2255
    @macewindu2255 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well damn, take the Americans out the picture and all you have is a handful of tanks and some planes from the other so call NATO countries. I thought it was for their self defence so you would think they pony up more material and equipment. It’s like almost 30 countries in this alliance, it’s absolutely ridiculous.

  • @MrG100000008
    @MrG100000008 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sweden Gripens better than F16

  • @MarkLandrebe-ef5yd
    @MarkLandrebe-ef5yd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's with xxx PERSON crew ?
    Have only seen MEN.

  • @SinglaRaghav
    @SinglaRaghav 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Latest Anti Satellite Weapons Video:
    th-cam.com/video/uvK5wSaamH4/w-d-xo.html

  • @Tapas82
    @Tapas82 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very soon all those weapons will be useless 😅

  • @I01I1
    @I01I1 ปีที่แล้ว

    We're getting b-21 new f-22 and the new a1 abram hopefully we get a new afv

    • @ZaNa-th3xd
      @ZaNa-th3xd ปีที่แล้ว

      also the russian have large Tayphoon class submarine, and Sarmat 2, and more than this … what about s400,s500!!!

    • @I01I1
      @I01I1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ZaNa-th3xd doesn't matter our new b-21 can carry nuclear weapons annd it's undetectable from any radar meaning it's stealth can raid anywhere in the world without being detected like china if it invades taiwan it can be controlled from a man or without a man it's like a drone it also costs 2.13 billion dollars each more expensive than the other b-2

    • @I01I1
      @I01I1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ZaNa-th3xd and it goes over 10,000 mph making it 10x beter than the sumbarines and missles that russia has I'm glad I'm in the west side

    • @I01I1
      @I01I1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ZaNa-th3xd the usa also has a new fast hypersonic missle not only that the gas prices has dropped and inflation making usa overrated again

    • @ZaNa-th3xd
      @ZaNa-th3xd ปีที่แล้ว

      How you know this is don't be undetectable? You tested every radars ? what about F-117 stealth in Serbia by S-125 !!!

  • @TheMaverick613
    @TheMaverick613 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All seem primitive.... what we don't know about though, different story

  • @Pavlovsobaka
    @Pavlovsobaka 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Laughs in chinese

  • @kiketve2
    @kiketve2 ปีที่แล้ว

    BETTER EQUIP UKRAINE WITH MODERN YANKS, FIGHTING VEHICLES, JETS AND APACHE / CHINOOK HELICOPTERS, LONG-RANGE MISSILES, 20 MORE HIMARS (AT LEAST) IF THESE SOLDIERS DON'T HAVE FIGHTER JETS, THEY WILL NO BE ABLE TO CONDUCT COMBINED ARMS EFFECTIVELY AS THE U.S. DID AGAINST SADDAM HUSSEIN IN KUWAIT

  • @MassMass-po4ws
    @MassMass-po4ws ปีที่แล้ว

    15country nato vs One Rusia😎

  • @DenKrylov-n3t
    @DenKrylov-n3t 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NATO 💪💪💪👌✊

  • @hykepark4480
    @hykepark4480 ปีที่แล้ว

    i wish this channel was updated.... everything on this site is out of date... lmfao

  • @draganperkovic7181
    @draganperkovic7181 ปีที่แล้ว

    B 21.

  • @paul1357999
    @paul1357999 ปีที่แล้ว

    F22?

  • @itzkg0_music
    @itzkg0_music 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    same advanced weapons that couldn't detect missile that killed 2 polands

    • @ZaNa-th3xd
      @ZaNa-th3xd ปีที่แล้ว

      NATO cannot stop hypersonic russia missile

  • @Twiggz54
    @Twiggz54 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is almost like you just clicked the first 10 items on Wikipedia for the NATO countries. Rather poor video.

  • @psiquestate7863
    @psiquestate7863 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🧐

  • @jackhammer111
    @jackhammer111 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    b 52 advanced? 🤣🤣

  • @sticksrandomstuffkid9730
    @sticksrandomstuffkid9730 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    First

  • @cortilusgrant7675
    @cortilusgrant7675 ปีที่แล้ว

    A weapon is a dead god Eros ⚘ 🌚 👍 rest in the good news ⚘ Okay bye

  • @manjusri3934
    @manjusri3934 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤🎉Al Fida Calling 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 Peacemaker Universal Truth Light Jehovah Judda Almighty God Father Heavenly God Father Bless My World 🌎 Forgive Everyone Bless My United Unique Nations Nato Forces And His Precious 💞 Family's Go To Heaven's Love 💕 Letter s From Your First Heavenly Prince ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤My Heavenly Nations Proud Pride Government's president's Nato Forces We Are Remembering Your Souls Service And Sacrifices Forever Love 💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕

  • @godzen22
    @godzen22 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A joke😂😂😂 hehehe

    • @christyassid8871
      @christyassid8871 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Why do you think this is a joke?

    • @kaamoshaamu
      @kaamoshaamu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@christyassid8871 He is in Kremlin payroll.

    • @christyassid8871
      @christyassid8871 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kaamoshaamu I see.

  • @offline7620
    @offline7620 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why are you still using outdated units in America

    • @UnicornMeat512
      @UnicornMeat512 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I dont know. Let's ask russia.

  • @KimberlyLeeCenerizio-hz6bc
    @KimberlyLeeCenerizio-hz6bc ปีที่แล้ว

    B12HF UK I AM REQUESTING NATO AIR SERVICES GROUND AND AIR SERVICES
    KEYS TO MY APARTMENT KEYS TO MY CAR FOUR ATTEMPTS ON MY LIFE .
    I WOULD BE GRATEFUL FOR ASSISTANCE ON MY BEHALF

  • @kingafendikingafendi8897
    @kingafendikingafendi8897 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Stop the gimmick country bought weapons because they got some interest not how good it is CORRUPTION

  • @robertdock-dn7wy
    @robertdock-dn7wy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whoever made this list is terrible!
    The most advanced weapon in nato was listed at number 15 when it’s actually number 1. I think this is the dumbest military video I’ve ever watched! I just wish I could take it all back and never have watched it , or commented on it at all!

  • @draganperkovic7181
    @draganperkovic7181 ปีที่แล้ว

    B 2 JE OBOREN IZNAD SRBIJE 1999G I TO STAROM PVO TEHNIKOM VOJSKE SRBIJE,PILOT PREŽIVEO I POSLE 10G BIO U POSETI SRBIJI,

  • @kingafendikingafendi8897
    @kingafendikingafendi8897 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not advance yet even advance Russia aircraft went down , this is not Iraq war NATO won't last in Ukraine war 🤣😂😅

    • @jayanttewari8227
      @jayanttewari8227 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Great scientist

    • @pharasite3011
      @pharasite3011 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Go back to your bot bunker 😺

    • @jayanttewari8227
      @jayanttewari8227 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pharasite3011 really like Putin is in bunker. But don't worry NATO will drag him out like Saddam. No one can run out from superpowers.

  • @ΛΕΩΝΙΔΑΣΤΗΣΣΠΑΡΤΗΣ
    @ΛΕΩΝΙΔΑΣΤΗΣΣΠΑΡΤΗΣ ปีที่แล้ว

    F-22 left the chat

  • @nohaboy100
    @nohaboy100 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any aircraft that is not stationed in USAFE or PACAF already is not automatically going to be utilized in any NATO conflict. History has proven this. We are a part of NATO but are not obligated to use all of our arsenal. I think this would apply to Subs and Ships as well. This video is misleading in those respects.

  • @tikasiwakoti9070
    @tikasiwakoti9070 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    32 nato nations are the size of one third of Russia only. Russia is soooo big that about 5 USA countries combined?????

  • @อิรฟาน.เบตต้า
    @อิรฟาน.เบตต้า 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    🇹🇭❤🇺🇸