Yup, after years of boasting your independence from NATO. You now get to join with out paying any of the fees that allied countries have paid for more than 60 years.
They are getting the lrhw, long range hypersonic weapon. It’s a boost glide vehicle with a predicted range of 1500-2000 miles. The US military is shifting doctrine to fit the pacific theater so expect some crazy long range precision weapons in the future.
13:00 , Imma correct you right there, the he called it the apache gunship, however, the apache is an attack helicopter, gunships are something completely different, attack helicopters are meant to target tanks and armored targets, gunships however are meant for infantry, attack heli's usually have so AGM's, an mg, etc, gunships however are like the air cavalry you think of when you think of Vietnam [war], except the gunners don't get off, and the helicopter is armed with an mg (copilot controlled and the 2 others)
I saw the B2 and F117 first when I was kid. There was an AF not far where we lived and watching those planes were just unbelievable! As a kid I thought its a space ship. (I saw like 10)
❤🎉Al Fida Calling 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 Peacemaker Universal Truth Light Jehovah Judda Almighty God Father Heavenly God Father Bless My World 🌎 Forgive Everyone Bless My United Unique Nations Nato Forces And His Precious 💞 Family's Go To Heaven's Love 💕 Letter s From Your First Heavenly Prince ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤My Heavenly Nations Proud Pride Government's president's Nato Forces We Are Remembering Your Souls Service And Sacrifices Forever Love 💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕
I feel like titling this "most advanced" is a bit of a misnomer. A bunch of these are stalwarts of the USAF and Europe but I wouldn't exactly call the Stratofortress or Apache "advanced" in 2022, and the Eurofighter Typhoon isn't even a fifth-generation fighter jet lol.
It's as advanced as anything g the enemy has. The weapons are extremely expensive to not only engineer but to build. Most cou tries will have these type of weapons for decades before they are replaced. So they are advanced with the latest upgrades until someone else creates something newer and deadlier
BETTER EQUIP UKRAINE WITH MODERN YANKS, FIGHTING VEHICLES, JETS AND APACHE / CHINOOK HELICOPTERS, LONG-RANGE MISSILES, 20 MORE HIMARS (AT LEAST) IF THESE SOLDIERS DON'T HAVE FIGHTER JETS, THEY WILL NO BE ABLE TO CONDUCT COMBINED ARMS EFFECTIVELY AS THE U.S. DID AGAINST SADDAM HUSSEIN IN KUWAIT
Whoever made this list is terrible! The most advanced weapon in nato was listed at number 15 when it’s actually number 1. I think this is the dumbest military video I’ve ever watched! I just wish I could take it all back and never have watched it , or commented on it at all!
I really wish that people would remember that the Apache helicopter was designed and built by McDonnell Douglas. And that due to improper leadership was acquired by Boeing. Douglas always had the better designed equipment. John McDonnell the 4th signed a bad deal with the Air Force for the C-17 and wasted lots of money trying to develop a plane the ran with a jet engine on one side and turbo prop on the other. We were proud to work there, and was very unhappy with our leadership.
My parents and my grandfather built the very first B-2 Bomber at Northrop, in Orange county California. They have officially signed notes of thanks from the president. I had a huge poster of it when I was 10 from actually Northrop. Only place it could be purchased. I held on to it up till about 5 years ago to a long time service vet. He helped us move out 5th will to where we live now. His side job. Before he left I gave him my poster. Turns out he collects this stuff. It was rough around the edges but he was excited. Only so many existed. He said he will fix it. I waited all my life to give it to the right person. I am glad one came.
Awesome story. My grandpa and “uncle” (my grandpas best friend for life) worked at Hydrulic Research in Burbank and developed parts for the Saturn V rockets
My Grandma retired from Hughs Air Craft as well. But as things got a bit rough in the industries my parents got laid off in 1990 and we moved on but it was a good place to work with good benefit.
B12HF UK I AM REQUESTING NATO AIR SERVICES GROUND AND AIR SERVICES KEYS TO MY APARTMENT KEYS TO MY CAR FOUR ATTEMPTS ON MY LIFE . I WOULD BE GRATEFUL FOR ASSISTANCE ON MY BEHALF
There is so much missing which really tells u just how powerful NATO is. And if u consider that the EU has just reached the 2% of GDP figure, there will be a lot more coming. You should have included F22 Rafael F16 F15 Awacs planes, like the italian one or the US ones Osprey Centauro and stryker Bergamini, horizon, type 26 and 45, nimitz/Gerald r ford carriers, u212 (german submarines)
Well damn, take the Americans out the picture and all you have is a handful of tanks and some planes from the other so call NATO countries. I thought it was for their self defence so you would think they pony up more material and equipment. It’s like almost 30 countries in this alliance, it’s absolutely ridiculous.
NLAW UK Sweeden best missile system is Norway Astute sub UK also Challanger 2 UK US has most weapons as larger Army but not the best they thought that in the cold war also and UK shoed the US how easy it would be to nuke them th-cam.com/video/-Wx6npt421c/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=MarkFeltonProductions
The F-35 wasn’t just developed for the US military, it’s 15% British designed & British made, incorporating technology from the speculative Harrier III concept.
@@johnbattle7518 “we just allowed you to join in”? 🤣 You seriously think the US military-industrial complex would willingly outsource *anything* they didn’t have to? There is *nothing* altruistic about this situation. That 15% is British because the US either couldn’t make it at all, or at least couldn’t make it to the required standard and/or cheaply enough.
@Dalex Horizon You're stated we got thevUK to make 15% because we couldn't do it. That's the source I want. This whole video is American made tech, but we can't do 15% of our own jet. Where are the sources that say we can't?????
@@ZaNa-th3xd doesn't matter our new b-21 can carry nuclear weapons annd it's undetectable from any radar meaning it's stealth can raid anywhere in the world without being detected like china if it invades taiwan it can be controlled from a man or without a man it's like a drone it also costs 2.13 billion dollars each more expensive than the other b-2
Any aircraft that is not stationed in USAFE or PACAF already is not automatically going to be utilized in any NATO conflict. History has proven this. We are a part of NATO but are not obligated to use all of our arsenal. I think this would apply to Subs and Ships as well. This video is misleading in those respects.
I like that Leopard TANK it Looks Awesome and The name IS cool. B2 Spirit IS great weapon plane. PS Im from in Finland and we are joining Nato. 🇫🇮
Yup, after years of boasting your independence from NATO. You now get to join with out paying any of the fees that allied countries have paid for more than 60 years.
Your politicians are stupid. You had a good relationship with Russia. Now they are going to put nukes on your borders. Brainless ignorant fools.
Good for you
@@brookebutler4675 yep, it's awesome and safe live here :)
If your excepted within a reasonable time? Looks like it takes years to be expected in? Good luck on that. If they except you?
As technology develops, technology itself is also the weakness as the gps and satellite systems..
Great weapons
how do you call a very basic bomber more advanced than a f-35, and why was the f-22 not on this?
It was a rediculous choice. Likely just bait to get us to comment. I didn't give the vid a thumbs up.
What's with xxx PERSON crew ?
Have only seen MEN.
Latest Anti Satellite Weapons Video:
th-cam.com/video/uvK5wSaamH4/w-d-xo.html
Uhh the u.k. has the F-35B for the Air Force and navy also the b-52H will be still in service until beyond 2500
Himars is just getting a lot of press lately. It's actually about to be replaced.
With what?
They are getting the lrhw, long range hypersonic weapon. It’s a boost glide vehicle with a predicted range of 1500-2000 miles. The US military is shifting doctrine to fit the pacific theater so expect some crazy long range precision weapons in the future.
How'd they get Charlie Sheen to narrate this?
First
Very soon all those weapons will be useless 😅
So the Eurofighter is more advanced than the F-22? lol 🤣🤣
🧐
NATO 💪💪💪👌✊
i wish this channel was updated.... everything on this site is out of date... lmfao
B 2 JE OBOREN IZNAD SRBIJE 1999G I TO STAROM PVO TEHNIKOM VOJSKE SRBIJE,PILOT PREŽIVEO I POSLE 10G BIO U POSETI SRBIJI,
That Leopard 2A7+ is a badass tank
I say there needs to be a new revolution to make our enimies even more scared than before.
13:00 , Imma correct you right there, the he called it the apache gunship, however, the apache is an attack helicopter, gunships are something completely different, attack helicopters are meant to target tanks and armored targets, gunships however are meant for infantry, attack heli's usually have so AGM's, an mg, etc, gunships however are like the air cavalry you think of when you think of Vietnam [war], except the gunners don't get off, and the helicopter is armed with an mg (copilot controlled and the 2 others)
himars and javelin for sure, game changers
Satellites IMO are the most useful weapons during a war.
and probably any anti satellite measures, i imagine that will get messy
I saw the B2 and F117 first when I was kid. There was an AF not far where we lived and watching those planes were just unbelievable! As a kid I thought its a space ship. (I saw like 10)
Chris Kane introduced NATO to the woke mob.
Where is the f22 America is a part of nato so it is a nato weapon
That thing was loud as hell. On take off it sounded like 200 lawnmower engines taking off.
❤🎉Al Fida Calling 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 🤙 Peacemaker Universal Truth Light Jehovah Judda Almighty God Father Heavenly God Father Bless My World 🌎 Forgive Everyone Bless My United Unique Nations Nato Forces And His Precious 💞 Family's Go To Heaven's Love 💕 Letter s From Your First Heavenly Prince ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤My Heavenly Nations Proud Pride Government's president's Nato Forces We Are Remembering Your Souls Service And Sacrifices Forever Love 💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕
I feel like titling this "most advanced" is a bit of a misnomer. A bunch of these are stalwarts of the USAF and Europe but I wouldn't exactly call the Stratofortress or Apache "advanced" in 2022, and the Eurofighter Typhoon isn't even a fifth-generation fighter jet lol.
It's as advanced as anything g the enemy has. The weapons are extremely expensive to not only engineer but to build. Most cou tries will have these type of weapons for decades before they are replaced. So they are advanced with the latest upgrades until someone else creates something newer and deadlier
BETTER EQUIP UKRAINE WITH MODERN YANKS, FIGHTING VEHICLES, JETS AND APACHE / CHINOOK HELICOPTERS, LONG-RANGE MISSILES, 20 MORE HIMARS (AT LEAST) IF THESE SOLDIERS DON'T HAVE FIGHTER JETS, THEY WILL NO BE ABLE TO CONDUCT COMBINED ARMS EFFECTIVELY AS THE U.S. DID AGAINST SADDAM HUSSEIN IN KUWAIT
Whoever made this list is terrible!
The most advanced weapon in nato was listed at number 15 when it’s actually number 1. I think this is the dumbest military video I’ve ever watched! I just wish I could take it all back and never have watched it , or commented on it at all!
All seem primitive.... what we don't know about though, different story
I really wish that people would remember that the Apache helicopter was designed and built by McDonnell Douglas. And that due to improper leadership was acquired by Boeing. Douglas always had the better designed equipment. John McDonnell the 4th signed a bad deal with the Air Force for the C-17 and wasted lots of money trying to develop a plane the ran with a jet engine on one side and turbo prop on the other. We were proud to work there, and was very unhappy with our leadership.
The Apache was designed and developed by Hughes Helicopter. HH also produced it until 1984 when MD bought HH.
It is almost like you just clicked the first 10 items on Wikipedia for the NATO countries. Rather poor video.
My parents and my grandfather built the very first B-2 Bomber at Northrop, in Orange county California. They have officially signed notes of thanks from the president. I had a huge poster of it when I was 10 from actually Northrop. Only place it could be purchased. I held on to it up till about 5 years ago to a long time service vet. He helped us move out 5th will to where we live now. His side job. Before he left I gave him my poster. Turns out he collects this stuff. It was rough around the edges but he was excited. Only so many existed. He said he will fix it. I waited all my life to give it to the right person. I am glad one came.
Awesome story. My grandpa and “uncle” (my grandpas best friend for life) worked at Hydrulic Research in Burbank and developed parts for the Saturn V rockets
I know they developed and did something with the servos, that’s it
My Grandma retired from Hughs Air Craft as well. But as things got a bit rough in the industries my parents got laid off in 1990 and we moved on but it was a good place to work with good benefit.
I just lost an uncle who was an engineer on the B2, and I'm proud of him too
@@robertaltmanaltman7619 I live 15 minutes from Whiteman. I see them almost daily.
B12HF UK I AM REQUESTING NATO AIR SERVICES GROUND AND AIR SERVICES
KEYS TO MY APARTMENT KEYS TO MY CAR FOUR ATTEMPTS ON MY LIFE .
I WOULD BE GRATEFUL FOR ASSISTANCE ON MY BEHALF
Don’t think the harpoon should be on this list. Isn’t that being phased out shortly and being replaced with JASM.
Where are the NASAMS?
There is so much missing which really tells u just how powerful NATO is. And if u consider that the EU has just reached the 2% of GDP figure, there will be a lot more coming.
You should have included
F22
Rafael
F16
F15
Awacs planes, like the italian one or the US ones
Osprey
Centauro and stryker
Bergamini, horizon, type 26 and 45, nimitz/Gerald r ford carriers, u212 (german submarines)
No, most of Europe still is below the 2%
Well damn, take the Americans out the picture and all you have is a handful of tanks and some planes from the other so call NATO countries. I thought it was for their self defence so you would think they pony up more material and equipment. It’s like almost 30 countries in this alliance, it’s absolutely ridiculous.
Dwelling on the defense of civilians advances the art of weaponry, because everything already works.
Hey there is Himars again :P
Awesome documentary thanks
NATO weapons are mainly from the US.
NLAW UK Sweeden best missile system is Norway Astute sub UK also Challanger 2 UK US has most weapons as larger Army but not the best they thought that in the cold war also and UK shoed the US how easy it would be to nuke them th-cam.com/video/-Wx6npt421c/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=MarkFeltonProductions
Stop the gimmick country bought weapons because they got some interest not how good it is CORRUPTION
32 nato nations are the size of one third of Russia only. Russia is soooo big that about 5 USA countries combined?????
No Rafale.... Not expected bruh
15country nato vs One Rusia😎
This isn't NATO weapons, these are weapons individual NATO coutries have
A weapon is a dead god Eros ⚘ 🌚 👍 rest in the good news ⚘ Okay bye
Europe is advanced continent of the world and super power also. Rest are burning birds .
Bro should’ve just said the U.S 💀
Pretty much most of Europe are moochers
Are they in order? No way HIMARS are more advanced than an F35.
Me watching $1.5 million missiles being launched: 😶bye...
I know the voice of the guy from Simple History lol 🙌🏼
Why do missiles cost so much
Are tax dollars pay for them😂
the research on this site must have been done over 5 years ago
Laughs in chinese
Go ahead, China could compete
F22?
Sweden Gripens better than F16
same advanced weapons that couldn't detect missile that killed 2 polands
NATO cannot stop hypersonic russia missile
It'd be easy to take out Putin.
🇹🇭❤🇺🇸
You underestimated F35, B2 and beside tanks are no longer efficient like before
Ya it is easy to underestimate F35 if you just look at the stats like the speed and so on. Because of its technology it should be on rank 1
F-22 is the most advanced weapon system that has been revealed if we talk about weapons that some NATO country has.
F16 is missing here id say
b 52 advanced? 🤣🤣
B 21.
The F-35 wasn’t just developed for the US military, it’s 15% British designed & British made, incorporating technology from the speculative Harrier III concept.
Lol, you again. Where are those sources?
BTW, it's an American jet. We just allowed you to join in. Not even a quarter of the jet was developed by the UK
@@johnbattle7518 The sources are what the people actually making it say themselves.
@@johnbattle7518 “we just allowed you to join in”? 🤣 You seriously think the US military-industrial complex would willingly outsource *anything* they didn’t have to? There is *nothing* altruistic about this situation. That 15% is British because the US either couldn’t make it at all, or at least couldn’t make it to the required standard and/or cheaply enough.
@Dalex Horizon You're stated we got thevUK to make 15% because we couldn't do it. That's the source I want. This whole video is American made tech, but we can't do 15% of our own jet. Where are the sources that say we can't?????
We're getting b-21 new f-22 and the new a1 abram hopefully we get a new afv
also the russian have large Tayphoon class submarine, and Sarmat 2, and more than this … what about s400,s500!!!
@@ZaNa-th3xd doesn't matter our new b-21 can carry nuclear weapons annd it's undetectable from any radar meaning it's stealth can raid anywhere in the world without being detected like china if it invades taiwan it can be controlled from a man or without a man it's like a drone it also costs 2.13 billion dollars each more expensive than the other b-2
@@ZaNa-th3xd and it goes over 10,000 mph making it 10x beter than the sumbarines and missles that russia has I'm glad I'm in the west side
@@ZaNa-th3xd the usa also has a new fast hypersonic missle not only that the gas prices has dropped and inflation making usa overrated again
How you know this is don't be undetectable? You tested every radars ? what about F-117 stealth in Serbia by S-125 !!!
A joke😂😂😂 hehehe
Why do you think this is a joke?
@@christyassid8871 He is in Kremlin payroll.
@@kaamoshaamu I see.
why are you still using outdated units in America
I dont know. Let's ask russia.
Not advance yet even advance Russia aircraft went down , this is not Iraq war NATO won't last in Ukraine war 🤣😂😅
Great scientist
Go back to your bot bunker 😺
@@pharasite3011 really like Putin is in bunker. But don't worry NATO will drag him out like Saddam. No one can run out from superpowers.
Any aircraft that is not stationed in USAFE or PACAF already is not automatically going to be utilized in any NATO conflict. History has proven this. We are a part of NATO but are not obligated to use all of our arsenal. I think this would apply to Subs and Ships as well. This video is misleading in those respects.
F-22 left the chat
Engage