Unless I missed it i didn't hear any mention of the DGO sensor which by all accounts is giving the c70 a better dynamic range and a cleaner image at most ISOs (other than really high ones where obviously the Sony comes into it's own. Given that that is being punted as the camera's stand out feature it seems incomplete to miss it out
I'm a Canon user and haven't used Sony cameras, but in my opinion, both brands are excellent. Sony has made a lot of advancements, their color and autofocus have dramatically improved and I'm glad Sony users are benefiting from such great cameras. And I love what Canon is doing with the C70, and hopefully with the rumored C50 and C90 as well.
Something to consider that people seem to have forgotten is that the C70 only records in Long-Gop for anything above 30p whereas the fx6 records All-I up right the way through, that's how the C70 can get away with only using SD cards. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Really good point. I'm not certain either, is that the case it or does it only offer h265, which is the higher bit rate than long-gop while being more economical of file file and allowing SD cards? I actually don't like h265 when there is a lot of movement on screen
@@videosforthepeople9130 I agree, each to there own, they can both get to the same grade pretty easily. I have some stuff on IG if you wanna take a look.
Things that stands out for me on the FX6 is the variable NDs, insane high ISO performance, 240fps and the monitor can be mounted anywhere. C70 for me is just the Canon colours that I am used to and still prefer. Which will I buy? Neither. Will use my old Canon cinema gear I have right now until Canon gets more things right like Sony did. It's not like buying new gear will make me more money.
Stripping audio off the FX6 body was silly, but a nice workaround would be to use the Atomos in place of FX6's stock screen, and have audio going directly into Atomos. RAW recording and high rez audio. It can still be mounted to the body somewhere so as not to tug on your gimbal motors, but in a place that's more advantageous to the balance of your rig.
Finally a good comparison video. I’m interested to know how the AF on the FX6 works with Canon EF lenses. I’m heavily invested in canon glass, but the fx6 attracts me more
if people are here in 2023, it is probably worth mentioning the firmware updates for the c70 now supports better autofocus modes & can shoot raw internally.
Hello Matt, great video as always! I’m giving you some thoughts about your points in the video. As a wedding filmmaker how can you work with the fx6 on a gimbal ? There are no sound inputs on the body, you passed that very very fast! This is 100% a dealbreaker!! Secondly to work with the FX6 on a gimbal you need to remove so many things from it that takes time and for sure will make you loose moments on the wedding day while with the c70 you can shoot handheld or on a monopod and immediately as it is put it on a gimbal without removing anything. C70 has EIS and almost every RF lens has IS , there is no way to stabilise the FX6 other than gyroscopic data that will make you firstly raise the shutter speed and loose the motion blur and secondly add one more step in post production. C70 has the same sensor as the C300iii and we all have seen the dynamic range comparison between the C300iii and FX9. C300iii was the clear winner. While s-cinetone has better colors than Slog3 you are limiting your self to 12 stops of dynamic range. Clog2 on the other hand has great skin tones and dynamic range. I’ll give AF to Sony with a big but, there is not object tracking on the FX6 which is super important when you want to track something other than a face or an eye. C70 has it. Sony is of course the lowlight king there is no question about it as C70 is useable at up to 12.800iso. Last but not least FX6’s menu is a disaster and from what I have seen from Philip’s bloom video is not user friendly at all.. many will prefer the A7S3 because of that. I’m not against the points you made, FX6 is a really great camera but it’s not that easy to recommend it over the C70 for a wedding filmmaker. Thanks 🙏
I couldn't agree more with you! I would also like to add a couple of things: • Most of the G master lenses are not stabilised at all, while most of RF lenses have 5 axis stabilisation and in the C70 you can even stabilise a prime lenses that doesn't communicate with the camera indicating the lenses you are using in the menu (like in the C300mkIII or any alpha camera). This is a complete game changer for hand held shooting (and I think everyone interested in a compact cinema cam is planning to shoot handheld quite often). • Another thing to consider is that maybe in US there isn't a big difference in price but here in Europe the FX6 costs 1200€ more than the Canon (around 1500 dollars). I think the C70 is a better option for most of the purposes except if you're planning to work on a set environment only and you need RAW.
a dealbreaker for you but for my part, I only use gimbal to introduce a place or follow someone (but most of the times I do handheld). I hate wedding videos that are only filmed with gimbal, it looks so clinical
I've had a lot of experience with the Canon c300mkii and a little experience with the Sony Fs7. I can't stand using the Fs7. I feel like I'm fighting the camera at all times, because I'm not using it the way they want me to. Canon lets me adjust any settings on the fly, whereas Sony forces me to either use one of 3 ISO and White-balance presets, leave it on Auto, or dive deep into the menus to adjust my presets. The ISO work-around seems to be just to set it really high and use ND to compensate. Even just changing color-profiles is kind of a pain. It's not a huge deal-breaker but it feels really clunky, un-intuitive, and certainly not user-friendly. Based on my experience, I REALLY don't understand why people use Sony cinema cameras for run-and-gun shoots aside from the auto-focus. I would rather use a Canon camera any day, and for that reason alone, I'm going C70. They're close enough in specs, price, and footage quality, that for me, ease of use and color-space becomes the deciding factor.
I’m between these two cameras and am not tied to either brand. I’ll be primarily shooting indoor TH-cam beauty videos. I’d love Matt & the community’s input. 🎥
Community here 🙋🏽♂️ I’d go for a mirror less camera option! These two cameras are catered more towards filmakers/cinematographers. Not that you wouldn’t be able to use them! I would just go mirror less and invest in quality glass! Just my 2 cents :)
One BIG compelling reason for me is the RF lenses. I like to split my photo/video image taking in to two different systems. The Full Frame Canon R5 manages the Photo side and the Canon C70 can handle the video side with aplomb. With the RF mount on both that is a HUGE win in image quality. The RF lenses are stellar.
True but I can only imagine that Canon will come out with a C90 that is full-frame. All their RF glass is full-frame and considering that Sony is now offering full-frame in the C70 rival, they have to do it.
For real thou, DGO would have cleaner shadows and that dual native is only usable on 12800 ISO and is not as clean. He also forget to mention the worse menu system on Sony and that mic input on the handle pretty much defeats the purpose of being small compare to C70 it's all in the body. You can always allow yourself to put accessories on C70 but on Sony you are forced to dangle your handle and monitor bolding out of the camera. He's way too much Sony biased on this video.
@@aregal yeah ur right about the limitations of DGO, but other aspects of his comparison, i just want to point it out theres a lot more why it's unfair.
@@nicholasboule5134 Yes, that's true. You are absolutely right. It happens all the time. Implementation of the idea isn't always good as advertised on paper. I have seen Philip's video too but it's early days yet. Let's see how the perform head to head when the actual models are released and not thee pre production models. When Covid is over, I plan to make a review on my channel putting these two cameras to real world autofocus test.
I mean not only about focusing quality but also about convenience, usability on the field, etc. Since we can touch to tracking or change between faces in one frame so easily on C70, I think C70 still have some advantages. And does it really that difficult to implement object tracking on FX6, since FX6 and A7S III almost share the same sensor, same CPU ? Hope Sony will give us this feature in next update.
@@locxucreator from what I gather it’s not the sensor but the screen that is the issue: the little Sony Fx-6 screen is not a full touch screen in the way the A7siii is. I have no idea why they have decided to limit the camera in this way.
You didn’t mention the Canon having a touch screen for the autofocus where the Sony doesn’t - this is Philip Bloom’s big issue with the Fx-6. I’m also wondering if Canon have got a C100 or C200 replacement up their sleeve in the next few months. There is a big gap between the c70 and the the c300 now.
It's not just touch screen enabled, but Canons touch tracking is working properly unlike Sonys, and that's much more important than eyeAF people like to talk about :) Btw, you don't need C100 or C200 replacement, C70 is replacing both, it has fixed everything wrong with the C200, 422/10, high framerates, almost instant power on/media browser, lighter but still hefty and much better in your hands, battery life is back to C100 numbers, multiple codecs and a bunch of dual card recording options, even menus and ergonomics are better, you can now program one of the wheels on the back to directly change Kelvin values using your thumb, it's bonkers, no camera has that. It has multiple buttons on and around the grip, so you can put your AF options, high framerates and many things all on your fingertips. I've switched from C200 to C70 and everything is much better, even the colors, DR is better, this is the ultimate run'n'gun, event, wedding, corporate, music videos, gimbal/steadicam camera. As for the viewfinder, the LCD is great and precise, and with a simple $100 LCD loupe (LCDVF) you get the largest and the best viewfinder in the world.
You are wrong about the sensor size, the c70 is x1.3 crop when compared to sony full frame. Also, when shooting in DCi mode, the difference is only x1.1
One more thing, the c70 is much smaller and portable package that is much faster to setup. As a Sony shooter, I do envy Canon users for having this option.
That's the problem with Red. You just get the body for that price. No monitor, batteries, handles or something else. You spend 6k on a Red and can't even use it.
@@BryceDearden thats true, but even with slight higher starting point, would it be better to invest in Komodo, or spend little less and get Fx6? That's a question i have been asking myself recently haha
@@byjakeburgess the Blackmagic stuff does look really good; I had a Pocket 4K and was always very happy with the results. I did find myself wanting shallower depth of field at times, but I realize there are speedboosters to accommodate that sort of thing. The biggest difference now, and will continue to become even greater, is the complete lack of a decent AF system. With Sony and Canon bringing advanced tracking algorithms to the table, it's near impossible to justify a manual camera in 2020 - especially as a solo shooter. It's definitely a tool and not a magic bullet, but listen to the people who have reviewed the FX6 in person. They almost all say things like "I can trust it to pull focus for me at f/1.4 while I'm flying around someone's face on a gimbal." That takes a deep amount of research and AI tuning to develop that BM just doesn't have (and I can't imagine they will anytime soon). Same goes for the RED, to be honest. It's great that there are options, but there are only two companies I would give my money to at this point.
Chris, I’ve been wondering the same thing. But the Komodo starts loosing a lot of points when it comes to sensor crop at the different frame rate modes. Check out potato jet’s video re: Komodo with his friend, after seeing all the FX6 reviews out there, that Komodo review made me realize how much it isn’t a strong contender. I’m also a Sony user looking to upgrade and wholeheartedly believe in the FX6 so I am a bit bias.
Really love the electronic variable ND. Only downfall to the FX6 is the AF tracking mode. You can’t touch to focus or less you select the mode before hand before each shot. Makes run and gun harder. Phillip Bloom and Gerald Undone talk about it in his review. Hate that the xlr is in the handle only too. Otherwise it looks amazing
Exactly. I had the camera in my cart and saw both those videos and that made it a deal breaker for me. That would annoy the heck out of me in the field. Better off getting the A7SIII and a VND
A speedbooster does not make a camera full-frame. It's close but the full-frame sensor will always render images slightly differently. A lens adaptor is really just giving you a wider, faster lens. Also forgetting to mention the DGO sensor is a big omission.
This comparison is definitely unfair. You forgot to mention menu system on both camera's (worse on Sony so it's much more hassle) and the DGO advantage over the Dual native ISO which would give points to the Canon. Also the canon's design on C70 is to put all the accessories on one body that's why all is attached and it's not really a disadvantage given thou to Sony body without the Mic input on the body is a huge drawback because it defeats the purpose of being compact if you just have accessories bolding out of the camera. I disagree when you said that Canon has fewer lens options. Since it's super 35, you have traditional cine lenses dedicated to super 35 so you can use them to adapt on canon's while Sony cannot take super 35 lenses and would have vignetting. I understand that yes with these amazing Sony features but you focused on those too too much that's why I just want to give a chance to Canon. I love that canon Cinema line has now going to the compact mirrorless world and this camera is not as crippled as those Canon R line up. I just cant stand that this review is just way too much Sony biased.
Good comparison! I would just add one category: usability. I am thinking of making the change from GH5 to dedicated video camera, and the C70 seems more user friendly.
ya, smaller camera and much easier to fit on a gimbal plus you dont gotta worry about a giant top handle. many ppl do do dual system audio so sony really failed as the a7s3 with the xlr module would be better for docu than the fx6
@Cherian Philip I was tempted by the SH5 actually... but the work I do would really benefit from autofocus. Plus I thought I'd take a step up to full video rather than hybrid. And built in NDs would be a blessing!
Village Blunder Agreed. I would have expected him to explain that the autofocus points would be more widely spaced. Don't see why they would be concentrated around the centre just because of a speed booster. Anyone know why that might be?
This is correct, from what I understand. You can’t use the touch screen on the Fx-6 to “touch” a subject on the screen that it will then follow. You can do this with the C70. Philip Bloom shows this in his review of the Sony.
@@retlwiz Though the AF appears to be far more reliable / sticky than the C70. I wish they would have given the C70 the same AF as the R5, if they have the technology why not - makes no sense
Thanks Matt, I'm a little late in the game for this choice, but for me, a real estate videographer and sometime commercial run a gun videographer, (often on a gimbal) I think the Sony is for me, thank you :)
I am on the horns of dilemma. I just canceled my C70 backorder to give me more time to think about this purchase. This is going to be my first cinema camera and I would like to get something that will survive the test of time and something that I can build off of. So, I have two questions. 1) Is there a lens adapter for EF lenses for FX6 that works as though it's native to the body? I only have EF glass at this point and am reluctant to start buying more expensive glass. 2). I plan on using this camera for everything, my main camera and for b-roll. I plan on using this for everything from short films, to commercials, to travel, to music videos. Which do you think will be the better option as an all encompassing body?
Honestly I'd go for the FX6 for the sensor alone. Whilst the speed booster would give the C70 the full frame FoV, its sensor still has smaller photosites and then you're limited by laws of physics. Still if you're already invested in the Canon camp then go for it but besides the audio located in the top handle I can't find anything else that bothers me about that camera, specially since the FS5 had one in the body and another in the top handle.
What about low light? Gyro stabilization? Wireless abilities? Ergonomics? Higher bitrate in camera recording? FX6 is a higher class camera in every way.
Outstanding, Matt. Easily the most useful video I've seen as I decide which camera to buy. Since I'm not at all invested in the Canon system, I think I'm going with the Song FX6. I hope it will eventually be mh B camera when I can afford a Sony Venice.
Thanks for the specs comparison of the two cameras. In my opinion, besides the ones you mentioned already. From an overall convenience point of view, if audio recording is important in all situations, and also if the user is a solo-shooter, than the C70 looks to be the better choice. The FX6 is made for more of a production team type where every role is separated. It is truly a cheaper but not much stripped off FX9.
Called it both times when canon announces the R5/R6 and with the C70!!.. Canons in trouble serious serious trouble!.. really really sure 95% of people who only need the best mirrorless format video centric camera will pick the A7S3... And now 95% of users who want a cinema camera that doesnt quite push to 6k down sampling and doesn't require full TV format implementation and mainly shoots documantarys, commercials, weddings etc will pick the FX-6 also because sonys massive library of lenses..... When Sony releases the A7IV that's really going to hammer the crap out of Canon.. they have no answers for Sony... Truely Beleive the A7IV could push canon to the brink of bankruptcy!..... The FX-6 effectively makes the canon C300 redudant... Why would 95% of people spend £11k on it when you can buy the FX-6 for £5500 British pounds so literally half for something that can do everything the same as the C300 but has a full frame, plus can do better slow motion and and has better low light capabilities hands down!!. Canon is fxcked!!!.
What is it with the weird naming? I wish camera companies would take a page from 1970's cars and name 'em like The Monty Carlo or Trans Am or something catchy!
If I were to get the FX6 and knew I was going to need to use it sometimes without the XLR attachment, I would probably take advantage of the timecode sync capability so that I'm not syncing by audio in Premiere (or Final Cut) and making myself depend on that tiny mic in the camera body. I'm just now learning this timecode sync topic but seems really handy.
Love your videos Mat. In my opinion the best reason to choose the Canon is the rf mount and glass. The rf glass is class leading and the mount allows for more sensor movement for IBIS and a greater amount of crop for post/processed stabilisation. It seems to me that all / most of the advantages of the A7Siii are firmware orientated, which would make them achievable for any piece of capable hardware
C70 definitely is more compact but also if you need a proper cinema having full size XLR and SDI output is great for full production. Both great cameras though what a persons needs and more convenient to make your work easier is what matters in the end.
Great vid, man! Thanks for the comparison. Just to help ya out, I do believe that the C70 can get 180 fps in 2K... (though I’ve also seen 1080 listed on a coupla sites.) Cheers.
I mentioned this on the Gerald Undone review, and its very apparent here. He didn't compare the image comparison. The C70 resolves a better 10bit image IMO, this is due to borrowing the sensor from the c300mkii, whilst the fx6 has the same sensor as the a7siii, both very amazing sensors. But whether its the dynamic range, or the colors SooC, the C70 looks better in footage ive seen across the internet. Was hoping for a more in depth comparison of this.
In tons of benefits of Sony FX6, you forget 600mbps which made unnecessary externsal recorders for most applications. C70 have only 260 mbps which is not enough for hard situations. Magical ND, ergonomics, low light, full frame, handgrip with lots buttons, FX6 wins everywhere ... for me, with same price
the lack of evf and internal raw is what upsets me about the c70, it was almost perfect (also would be nice to have a gyro stabilizer like the fx6). maybe Blackmagic can combine the two (although bad af with BM)
Hi Matt, just to make sure you know- not impossible for c70 viewfinder- zacuto already made one so there’s that. Just wanted to make sure you knew that before you influence your viewers with that misinformation that it would be impossible to do that
Why is it that nearly every TH-camr that has reviewed this camera is also claiming that they have all of a sudden "launched their LUT pack" randomly? This guy, Mark Bone...very curious.
Why everyone in the end has to be so subjective? Just say Buy sony because its the best.. Its sony an there are "other cameras" ..... Hahahah ^_^ (I am a guy that loves to be subjective, i dont have a beef with the brands but with the people that are stuck to something so much...so i have to react, i cant stand it ^_^ )
Even with the EF-EOS adapter on the C70 (for $600 more!), it's still a smaller sensor. It's not really full frame, only the field of view. Autofocus also suffers big time with this adapter. RF lenses are also way more expensive than Sony glass options. The Sony Variable ND is magic and the biggest reason to get the Sony in addition to way more bitrate recording options.
I’ll add that the FX 6 can only shoot 2K when in Super35/APS-C crop, and the C70 doesn’t have SDI-out. Those are dealbreakers for me. Neither would be a good studio-style cinema camera.
I wish the C70 had the following two things: - Full-frame sensor - Electronic ND-filter I'm convinced a full-frame equivalent is coming next year (probably C90) but electronic ND might be patented by Sony (not sure).
Having Super35 with a speedbooster option is much better for multiple things. You can use Super35 glass which is the majority of cinema lenses, you can use stills crop lenses, and also you have more reach when you need it, it's just more versatile. And for the eND, I already said it, but 7 stops of ND is not enough for anything larger than f2.8 lenses on a sunny day, or even any daylight/snow covered exterior. So if you want to use primes, and everyone should do that, FX6 is just a camera without the internal NDs. C70 has 10 stops and you can even use f1.0 lenses with that. ISO changes are gradual anyway so you can have similar effect but with 10 stops of ND. It also has AutoISO for the first time in Cinema EOS camera, and it has plugin power for 3.5mm and now every microphone works to the smallest ones.
@@vladimirtalijan You make good points. But we also want to use the new RF lenses without a crop. With the super 35 crop, there's currently nothing wider than 24mm. And low-light performance suffers from the small sensor. So while you might be right in that the electronic 7 stops ND isn't enough for prime lenses, we still need a full-frame sensor at some point. Canon already have it in their C500 (but for EF, not RF).
@@TerraThink Yeah, but RF lenses are much better than anything Sony has, Sony lenses should be compared to the EF ones, which are still better, with much better choice and less money, so that should be the comparison. Also, I like EF lenses more, they have a mechanical focus ring which is much better than fly by wire. There is no perfect camera but C70 is much closer to it than FX6.
Matt the legend :) There are more things to clear up, but one is very important and obvious for me, but seems like almost no one is realizing that 7 stop NDs are not enough for anything larger than f2.8, so if you use primes, and you should, you still need to have NDs like you don't have eNDs at all. You need at least 10 stops for primes and guess who has it :)
What you said about the c70 AF with the speed booster/adaptor. That makes no sense. The booster is just another lens along with the multiple lenses in the main lens. It shouldn’t make any difference at all to the AF performance. (As long as the adapted lens and camera are communicating ok, and the Focus motors are fast and responsive.) I think there maybe some mixup on that point. Great vid otherwise.
Kyle, I'm at the stage of deciding. Can you share why you went that route? Is this your only camera or did you also pick a Bcam? I need two but not the same level.
Great video Matt, thank you! Something worth mentioning in my opinion is that I wouldn't choose to add an adapter to get a full frame like sensor but introduce colour shifts. I just always prefer to not use adapters because they do have an effect on the image. To me the extra reach you get from the super 35 sensor is convenient and more versatile. Sometimes it's funny to get caught in these conversations between full frame and super 35 sensors at such a low level of cinematography when most multi million $ budget Hollywood shows aren't even shot on full frame cameras haha
Fantastic buyers guide! I don't have Canon or Sony lenses and my primary use case is business owner interviews incorporating b-roll demonstrating what they do. Nothing uncontrolled live like brides walking down the aisle. My conclusion after watching your analysis (despite the reservations of messrs Undone and Bloom) is get the FX6
I like the image of c70 more. They added the option of raw. The thing I would love to see in this camera is a 4:3 sensor for shooting anamorphic, a built in variable electronic ND like sony has, and the update eye af. Than I would definitelly buy this camera. And looking at Sony I would like the FX6 to have the same sensor as the FX9 also in 4:3 with the option to shoot open gate at 120 fps
I think honestly would make a new camera that is like FX6/9 with internal recording of ProRes 4444 that would be incredible, or it's X-OCN format (just something less expensive than the Venice, I'd pay 20k for a good middle camera)
😍 I just launched my first LUTs! Get them here for a special price: whoismatt.com/luts
What camera did you to film the review with? Looks great! And the content was amazing!
Screw your luts
Unless I missed it i didn't hear any mention of the DGO sensor which by all accounts is giving the c70 a better dynamic range and a cleaner image at most ISOs (other than really high ones where obviously the Sony comes into it's own. Given that that is being punted as the camera's stand out feature it seems incomplete to miss it out
I too am surprised by its omission
I'm a Canon user and haven't used Sony cameras, but in my opinion, both brands are excellent.
Sony has made a lot of advancements, their color and autofocus have dramatically improved and I'm glad Sony users are benefiting from such great cameras.
And I love what Canon is doing with the C70, and hopefully with the rumored C50 and C90 as well.
Something to consider that people seem to have forgotten is that the C70 only records in Long-Gop for anything above 30p whereas the fx6 records All-I up right the way through, that's how the C70 can get away with only using SD cards. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Really good point. I'm not certain either, is that the case it or does it only offer h265, which is the higher bit rate than long-gop while being more economical of file file and allowing SD cards? I actually don't like h265 when there is a lot of movement on screen
@@videosforthepeople9130 I’m not entirely sure, I own the fx6 now and loving it! Such a great camera the ergonomics are 👌🏻
@@JoshBenBernales I'm thinking FX6 too. Almost pulled the trigger on the C70. I actually like the Sony color more on top of the other pluses
@@videosforthepeople9130 I agree, each to there own, they can both get to the same grade pretty easily. I have some stuff on IG if you wanna take a look.
Things that stands out for me on the FX6 is the variable NDs, insane high ISO performance, 240fps and the monitor can be mounted anywhere. C70 for me is just the Canon colours that I am used to and still prefer. Which will I buy? Neither. Will use my old Canon cinema gear I have right now until Canon gets more things right like Sony did. It's not like buying new gear will make me more money.
Stripping audio off the FX6 body was silly, but a nice workaround would be to use the Atomos in place of FX6's stock screen, and have audio going directly into Atomos. RAW recording and high rez audio. It can still be mounted to the body somewhere so as not to tug on your gimbal motors, but in a place that's more advantageous to the balance of your rig.
which Atomos in particular? I didn't know you can record audio through it
Finally a good comparison video. I’m interested to know how the AF on the FX6 works with Canon EF lenses. I’m heavily invested in canon glass, but the fx6 attracts me more
same
Did you find out the answer to this??
@@simonglassfilm nope
If an artist buys the best paint and brushes for his work he will be successful as Leonardo Da Vinci. Ha ha…simpleton.
I'm glad to see the competition in somewhat affordable cinema cameras. Keep those innovations coming!
if people are here in 2023, it is probably worth mentioning the firmware updates for the c70 now supports better autofocus modes & can shoot raw internally.
Hello Matt, great video as always! I’m giving you some thoughts about your points in the video.
As a wedding filmmaker how can you work with the fx6 on a gimbal ? There are no sound inputs on the body, you passed that very very fast! This is 100% a dealbreaker!!
Secondly to work with the FX6 on a gimbal you need to remove so many things from it that takes time and for sure will make you loose moments on the wedding day while with the c70 you can shoot handheld or on a monopod and immediately as it is put it on a gimbal without removing anything.
C70 has EIS and almost every RF lens has IS , there is no way to stabilise the FX6 other than gyroscopic data that will make you firstly raise the shutter speed and loose the motion blur and secondly add one more step in post production.
C70 has the same sensor as the C300iii and we all have seen the dynamic range comparison between the C300iii and FX9.
C300iii was the clear winner.
While s-cinetone has better colors than Slog3 you are limiting your self to 12 stops of dynamic range.
Clog2 on the other hand has great skin tones and dynamic range.
I’ll give AF to Sony with a big but, there is not object tracking on the FX6 which is super important when you want to track something other than a face or an eye.
C70 has it.
Sony is of course the lowlight king there is no question about it as C70 is useable at up to 12.800iso.
Last but not least FX6’s menu is a disaster and from what I have seen from Philip’s bloom video is not user friendly at all.. many will prefer the A7S3 because of that.
I’m not against the points you made, FX6 is a really great camera but it’s not that easy to recommend it over the C70 for a wedding filmmaker.
Thanks 🙏
I couldn't agree more with you! I would also like to add a couple of things:
• Most of the G master lenses are not stabilised at all, while most of RF lenses have 5 axis stabilisation and in the C70 you can even stabilise a prime lenses that doesn't communicate with the camera indicating the lenses you are using in the menu (like in the C300mkIII or any alpha camera). This is a complete game changer for hand held shooting (and I think everyone interested in a compact cinema cam is planning to shoot handheld quite often).
• Another thing to consider is that maybe in US there isn't a big difference in price but here in Europe the FX6 costs 1200€ more than the Canon (around 1500 dollars).
I think the C70 is a better option for most of the purposes except if you're planning to work on a set environment only and you need RAW.
Amen!
a dealbreaker for you but for my part, I only use gimbal to introduce a place or follow someone (but most of the times I do handheld). I hate wedding videos that are only filmed with gimbal, it looks so clinical
11:41 *6 stops. My buddy has one. You can’t shoot wide open at 24fps in daylight. Especially shooting native ISO, S-log 2.
I've had a lot of experience with the Canon c300mkii and a little experience with the Sony Fs7. I can't stand using the Fs7. I feel like I'm fighting the camera at all times, because I'm not using it the way they want me to. Canon lets me adjust any settings on the fly, whereas Sony forces me to either use one of 3 ISO and White-balance presets, leave it on Auto, or dive deep into the menus to adjust my presets. The ISO work-around seems to be just to set it really high and use ND to compensate. Even just changing color-profiles is kind of a pain. It's not a huge deal-breaker but it feels really clunky, un-intuitive, and certainly not user-friendly. Based on my experience, I REALLY don't understand why people use Sony cinema cameras for run-and-gun shoots aside from the auto-focus. I would rather use a Canon camera any day, and for that reason alone, I'm going C70. They're close enough in specs, price, and footage quality, that for me, ease of use and color-space becomes the deciding factor.
I'm basically sold on the FX6, just unsure if I should get an A7S III and an FX6 or just some lower end mirrorless because they're pretty similar. XD
Interested in what you decided?
Fx6 and a1
I’m between these two cameras and am not tied to either brand. I’ll be primarily shooting indoor TH-cam beauty videos. I’d love Matt & the community’s input. 🎥
Community here 🙋🏽♂️ I’d go for a mirror less camera option! These two cameras are catered more towards filmakers/cinematographers. Not that you wouldn’t be able to use them! I would just go mirror less and invest in quality glass! Just my 2 cents :)
I am a Canon guy, and would love to get the C70. Love your videos! Thanks for all the information!
One BIG compelling reason for me is the RF lenses. I like to split my photo/video image taking in to two different systems. The Full Frame Canon R5 manages the Photo side and the Canon C70 can handle the video side with aplomb. With the RF mount on both that is a HUGE win in image quality. The RF lenses are stellar.
I want to like the C70 more, but it’s really tough to vote against a full frame sensor.
True but I can only imagine that Canon will come out with a C90 that is full-frame.
All their RF glass is full-frame and considering that Sony is now offering full-frame in the C70 rival, they have to do it.
I have never liked canon colors. Always found them over red. I wish Nikon made video, I love their colors.
THANKYOU ! I thought I was the only one who thought they were pinkish
@@toby8462 right? I just stare at people when they gush about the Canon colors. I think it is all marking hype.
Matt, you forgot to mention the C70's DGO sensor! Good comparison, though. :)
he is definitely sony biased
For real thou, DGO would have cleaner shadows and that dual native is only usable on 12800 ISO and is not as clean. He also forget to mention the worse menu system on Sony and that mic input on the handle pretty much defeats the purpose of being small compare to C70 it's all in the body. You can always allow yourself to put accessories on C70 but on Sony you are forced to dangle your handle and monitor bolding out of the camera. He's way too much Sony biased on this video.
@@navireljan1857 I think Matt did a fairly fair comparison, IMO. DGO doesn’t work in all video modes, so...it does have some caveats.
@@aregal yeah ur right about the limitations of DGO, but other aspects of his comparison, i just want to point it out theres a lot more why it's unfair.
@@aregal He might just forget to mention those things i mentioned but I understand that since the A7SIII release youtubers are now amazed with Sony.
Just one question : does FX6 support object tracking/ touch to track like A7S III? If not, how does FX6 auto focus compare with C70 ?
Fx6 should perform better in it's autofocus because Sony says it's using Ai technology part from the usual eye focus, face detect and touch to focus.
@@africaamaze yet in practice everyone like Philip bloom who have used both have said a7s3 is better
@@nicholasboule5134 Yes, that's true. You are absolutely right. It happens all the time. Implementation of the idea isn't always good as advertised on paper. I have seen Philip's video too but it's early days yet. Let's see how the perform head to head when the actual models are released and not thee pre production models. When Covid is over, I plan to make a review on my channel putting these two cameras to real world autofocus test.
I mean not only about focusing quality but also about convenience, usability on the field, etc. Since we can touch to tracking or change between faces in one frame so easily on C70, I think C70 still have some advantages. And does it really that difficult to implement object tracking on FX6, since FX6 and A7S III almost share the same sensor, same CPU ? Hope Sony will give us this feature in next update.
@@locxucreator from what I gather it’s not the sensor but the screen that is the issue: the little Sony Fx-6 screen is not a full touch screen in the way the A7siii is. I have no idea why they have decided to limit the camera in this way.
Did you actually use the c70?
You didn’t mention the Canon having a touch screen for the autofocus where the Sony doesn’t - this is Philip Bloom’s big issue with the Fx-6. I’m also wondering if Canon have got a C100 or C200 replacement up their sleeve in the next few months. There is a big gap between the c70 and the the c300 now.
Easy firmware fix by Sony.
It's not just touch screen enabled, but Canons touch tracking is working properly unlike Sonys, and that's much more important than eyeAF people like to talk about :) Btw, you don't need C100 or C200 replacement, C70 is replacing both, it has fixed everything wrong with the C200, 422/10, high framerates, almost instant power on/media browser, lighter but still hefty and much better in your hands, battery life is back to C100 numbers, multiple codecs and a bunch of dual card recording options, even menus and ergonomics are better, you can now program one of the wheels on the back to directly change Kelvin values using your thumb, it's bonkers, no camera has that. It has multiple buttons on and around the grip, so you can put your AF options, high framerates and many things all on your fingertips. I've switched from C200 to C70 and everything is much better, even the colors, DR is better, this is the ultimate run'n'gun, event, wedding, corporate, music videos, gimbal/steadicam camera. As for the viewfinder, the LCD is great and precise, and with a simple $100 LCD loupe (LCDVF) you get the largest and the best viewfinder in the world.
For me, C70 all the way, very versatile and portable, great AF and DGO sensor. The menu is also very intuitive.
the only 2 things that I would have like of the FX6 its xlr or a mic jack and super 35 in 4k
You are wrong about the sensor size, the c70 is x1.3 crop when compared to sony full frame. Also, when shooting in DCi mode, the difference is only x1.1
Also, since the fx6 can't do super35 mode, many cinema lenses will not work with this camera.
One more thing, the c70 is much smaller and portable package that is much faster to setup. As a Sony shooter, I do envy Canon users for having this option.
Fx6 vs Red Komodo next! Specifically since they are both at the same price point
They have the same price body only but it would be hard to get a Komodo set up for less than you can get an FX6 set up.
That's the problem with Red. You just get the body for that price. No monitor, batteries, handles or something else. You spend 6k on a Red and can't even use it.
I would be curious to see some discussion on the Komodo as the global shutter has my attention.
@@BryceDearden thats true, but even with slight higher starting point, would it be better to invest in Komodo, or spend little less and get Fx6? That's a question i have been asking myself recently haha
Red Komodo got in my opinion a pretty bad mount - RF. Especially for focus pulling.
I would love this same comparison with the RED Komodo thrown into the mix. Those are the 3 cameras I’m currently deciding between.
th-cam.com/video/6Z-xB5dnIfk/w-d-xo.html
@@daltonrandall4348 - Thank you!
the pocket 6k😉
@@byjakeburgess the Blackmagic stuff does look really good; I had a Pocket 4K and was always very happy with the results. I did find myself wanting shallower depth of field at times, but I realize there are speedboosters to accommodate that sort of thing. The biggest difference now, and will continue to become even greater, is the complete lack of a decent AF system. With Sony and Canon bringing advanced tracking algorithms to the table, it's near impossible to justify a manual camera in 2020 - especially as a solo shooter. It's definitely a tool and not a magic bullet, but listen to the people who have reviewed the FX6 in person. They almost all say things like "I can trust it to pull focus for me at f/1.4 while I'm flying around someone's face on a gimbal." That takes a deep amount of research and AI tuning to develop that BM just doesn't have (and I can't imagine they will anytime soon). Same goes for the RED, to be honest. It's great that there are options, but there are only two companies I would give my money to at this point.
Chris, I’ve been wondering the same thing. But the Komodo starts loosing a lot of points when it comes to sensor crop at the different frame rate modes. Check out potato jet’s video re: Komodo with his friend, after seeing all the FX6 reviews out there, that Komodo review made me realize how much it isn’t a strong contender. I’m also a Sony user looking to upgrade and wholeheartedly believe in the FX6 so I am a bit bias.
This is a very good cameraaaaaa. It has a big sensorrrrrrrrr. I exaggerate every last letter of my sentanceeeeeee....
ahahaa Seriously... so annoying... love his vids, just hate when he talks like that.
Fx6 every day of the year ❤️
C70 any day with better dynamic range and beautiful canon colors
Love the run and gun look of the C70.
Really love the electronic variable ND. Only downfall to the FX6 is the AF tracking mode. You can’t touch to focus or less you select the mode before hand before each shot. Makes run and gun harder. Phillip Bloom and Gerald Undone talk about it in his review. Hate that the xlr is in the handle only too. Otherwise it looks amazing
Exactly. I had the camera in my cart and saw both those videos and that made it a deal breaker for me. That would annoy the heck out of me in the field. Better off getting the A7SIII and a VND
Awesome content again bro! You’re a big inspiration for me starting my TH-cam channel!
I’m swiping from completely from Canon to Sony !
Awesome content man, keep it coming! I'll drop you a sub!
Got yourself a new sub here! Keep at it Joseph!
@@completeko8670 Thanks mate I really appreciate it !
@@getinvolved4633 Thanks so much :D
What made you decide to switch? I am thinking of doing the same honestly...not impressed with canon lately lol
A speedbooster does not make a camera full-frame. It's close but the full-frame sensor will always render images slightly differently. A lens adaptor is really just giving you a wider, faster lens. Also forgetting to mention the DGO sensor is a big omission.
This comparison is definitely unfair. You forgot to mention menu system on both camera's (worse on Sony so it's much more hassle) and the DGO advantage over the Dual native ISO which would give points to the Canon. Also the canon's design on C70 is to put all the accessories on one body that's why all is attached and it's not really a disadvantage given thou to Sony body without the Mic input on the body is a huge drawback because it defeats the purpose of being compact if you just have accessories bolding out of the camera. I disagree when you said that Canon has fewer lens options. Since it's super 35, you have traditional cine lenses dedicated to super 35 so you can use them to adapt on canon's while Sony cannot take super 35 lenses and would have vignetting. I understand that yes with these amazing Sony features but you focused on those too too much that's why I just want to give a chance to Canon. I love that canon Cinema line has now going to the compact mirrorless world and this camera is not as crippled as those Canon R line up. I just cant stand that this review is just way too much Sony biased.
Good comparison! I would just add one category: usability. I am thinking of making the change from GH5 to dedicated video camera, and the C70 seems more user friendly.
ya, smaller camera and much easier to fit on a gimbal plus you dont gotta worry about a giant top handle. many ppl do do dual system audio so sony really failed as the a7s3 with the xlr module would be better for docu than the fx6
@Cherian Philip I was tempted by the SH5 actually... but the work I do would really benefit from autofocus. Plus I thought I'd take a step up to full video rather than hybrid. And built in NDs would be a blessing!
C70 is more interesting!
RED KOMODO is the real threat now for any compact cinema camera, imo.
yeah but still not in a good price range when you build it
Something odd about that autofocus points with speed booster comment.
Village Blunder Agreed. I would have expected him to explain that the autofocus points would be more widely spaced. Don't see why they would be concentrated around the centre just because of a speed booster. Anyone know why that might be?
c70 says touch tracking but fx6 is a little more limited ya?
This is correct, from what I understand. You can’t use the touch screen on the Fx-6 to “touch” a subject on the screen that it will then follow. You can do this with the C70. Philip Bloom shows this in his review of the Sony.
@@retlwiz Though the AF appears to be far more reliable / sticky than the C70. I wish they would have given the C70 the same AF as the R5, if they have the technology why not - makes no sense
They're both great I'd assume most people would just get what they own the most lenses for
Thanks for the review I think C70 is way better option for me
So you’re just reading specs! Lol.
Hi Matt, which of the two would be more profitable for weddings?
Not even considering buying these cameras, just watching to support Matt :)
Thanks Matt, I'm a little late in the game for this choice, but for me, a real estate videographer and sometime commercial run a gun videographer, (often on a gimbal) I think the Sony is for me, thank you :)
I am on the horns of dilemma. I just canceled my C70 backorder to give me more time to think about this purchase. This is going to be my first cinema camera and I would like to get something that will survive the test of time and something that I can build off of. So, I have two questions.
1) Is there a lens adapter for EF lenses for FX6 that works as though it's native to the body? I only have EF glass at this point and am reluctant to start buying more expensive glass.
2). I plan on using this camera for everything, my main camera and for b-roll. I plan on using this for everything from short films, to commercials, to travel, to music videos. Which do you think will be the better option as an all encompassing body?
Honestly I'd go for the FX6 for the sensor alone. Whilst the speed booster would give the C70 the full frame FoV, its sensor still has smaller photosites and then you're limited by laws of physics. Still if you're already invested in the Canon camp then go for it but besides the audio located in the top handle I can't find anything else that bothers me about that camera, specially since the FS5 had one in the body and another in the top handle.
What about low light? Gyro stabilization? Wireless abilities? Ergonomics? Higher bitrate in camera recording? FX6 is a higher class camera in every way.
Outstanding, Matt. Easily the most useful video I've seen as I decide which camera to buy. Since I'm not at all invested in the Canon system, I think I'm going with the Song FX6. I hope it will eventually be mh B camera when I can afford a Sony Venice.
Thanks for the specs comparison of the two cameras. In my opinion, besides the ones you mentioned already. From an overall convenience point of view, if audio recording is important in all situations, and also if the user is a solo-shooter, than the C70 looks to be the better choice. The FX6 is made for more of a production team type where every role is separated. It is truly a cheaper but not much stripped off FX9.
something worth mentioning with the fx6 is you cant use a polariser filter and the built-in Nd filters it causes big issues.
Called it both times when canon announces the R5/R6 and with the C70!!.. Canons in trouble serious serious trouble!.. really really sure 95% of people who only need the best mirrorless format video centric camera will pick the A7S3... And now 95% of users who want a cinema camera that doesnt quite push to 6k down sampling and doesn't require full TV format implementation and mainly shoots documantarys, commercials, weddings etc will pick the FX-6 also because sonys massive library of lenses..... When Sony releases the A7IV that's really going to hammer the crap out of Canon.. they have no answers for Sony... Truely Beleive the A7IV could push canon to the brink of bankruptcy!..... The FX-6 effectively makes the canon C300 redudant... Why would 95% of people spend £11k on it when you can buy the FX-6 for £5500 British pounds so literally half for something that can do everything the same as the C300 but has a full frame, plus can do better slow motion and and has better low light capabilities hands down!!. Canon is fxcked!!!.
Except for those users who hate Sony color and menus and prefer Canon. So canon is in no trouble, I assure you. Competition is good. For everyone.
Having the audio on board is the only reason I would tell someone to get the C70 over the FX6.
What is it with the weird naming? I wish camera companies would take a page from 1970's cars and name 'em like The Monty Carlo or Trans Am or something catchy!
Of course you'll recommend sony... But maybe, just maybe for the fair comparison just have your hands on canon first...
the c70 is better for sure
If I were to get the FX6 and knew I was going to need to use it sometimes without the XLR attachment, I would probably take advantage of the timecode sync capability so that I'm not syncing by audio in Premiere (or Final Cut) and making myself depend on that tiny mic in the camera body. I'm just now learning this timecode sync topic but seems really handy.
Love your videos Mat. In my opinion the best reason to choose the Canon is the rf mount and glass. The rf glass is class leading and the mount allows for more sensor movement for IBIS and a greater amount of crop for post/processed stabilisation.
It seems to me that all / most of the advantages of the A7Siii are firmware orientated, which would make them achievable for any piece of capable hardware
C70 definitely is more compact but also if you need a proper cinema having full size XLR and SDI output is great for full production. Both great cameras though what a persons needs and more convenient to make your work easier is what matters in the end.
Great skin tones on your interview shot! What camera was the interview shot on? :)
Sony a7siii, colored with my whoismatt luts
FX6 is a great camera but shouldn’t be compared to the C70 especially after the Raw update.
the adapter can't increase the sensor's surface! It adapt the lens!!! so autofocus is the same with ff lens... :)
The FX6 is better deal and this is coming from a Canon fanboy. All the best Matt.
Great vid, man! Thanks for the comparison. Just to help ya out, I do believe that the C70 can get 180 fps in 2K... (though I’ve also seen 1080 listed on a coupla sites.) Cheers.
I mentioned this on the Gerald Undone review, and its very apparent here. He didn't compare the image comparison. The C70 resolves a better 10bit image IMO, this is due to borrowing the sensor from the c300mkii, whilst the fx6 has the same sensor as the a7siii, both very amazing sensors. But whether its the dynamic range, or the colors SooC, the C70 looks better in footage ive seen across the internet. Was hoping for a more in depth comparison of this.
I own the c70 so I know and a bit bias. But also. This is an older video because the c70 can do internal RAW now
Great info Matt! Really helpful. Thank you for posting!
In tons of benefits of Sony FX6, you forget 600mbps which made unnecessary externsal recorders for most applications. C70 have only 260 mbps which is not enough for hard situations. Magical ND, ergonomics, low light, full frame, handgrip with lots buttons, FX6 wins everywhere ... for me, with same price
the lack of evf and internal raw is what upsets me about the c70, it was almost perfect (also would be nice to have a gyro stabilizer like the fx6). maybe Blackmagic can combine the two (although bad af with BM)
Hi Matt, just to make sure you know- not impossible for c70 viewfinder- zacuto already made one so there’s that. Just wanted to make sure you knew that before you influence your viewers with that misinformation that it would be impossible to do that
Great in-depth comparison Matt! This year really has been a crazy one for cameras eh?
💯
Why is it that nearly every TH-camr that has reviewed this camera is also claiming that they have all of a sudden "launched their LUT pack" randomly? This guy, Mark Bone...very curious.
Not sure if already mentioned by others but the C70 can shoot up to 180fps.
FX6 Pre Ordered!
I don't want to talk about autofocus. I don't even have to money to buy either one of them but I love watching you talk about autofocus aniway.
I am not sure if I would not call it more youtube line than cinema line. Doesn't matter if canon or sony
Hey Matt, what’s your favourite out of the two for filming weddings ? I’m thinking of buying an FX6 but I also like the look of the Canon 5RC
Well, get the Sony FX3 then, or even the BM Pocket 6k Pro 💯
Great video Matt. Can you say how the low light is on the C70 without the speed booster?
Why everyone in the end has to be so subjective? Just say Buy sony because its the best.. Its sony an there are "other cameras" ..... Hahahah ^_^
(I am a guy that loves to be subjective, i dont have a beef with the brands but with the people that are stuck to something so much...so i have to react, i cant stand it ^_^ )
Even with the EF-EOS adapter on the C70 (for $600 more!), it's still a smaller sensor. It's not really full frame, only the field of view. Autofocus also suffers big time with this adapter. RF lenses are also way more expensive than Sony glass options. The Sony Variable ND is magic and the biggest reason to get the Sony in addition to way more bitrate recording options.
I’ll add that the FX 6 can only shoot 2K when in Super35/APS-C crop, and the C70 doesn’t have SDI-out. Those are dealbreakers for me. Neither would be a good studio-style cinema camera.
Why did canon release a RF mount super 35 censors camera while there is no RF super 35 lens to be used.
What’s the point ?
I wish the C70 had the following two things:
- Full-frame sensor
- Electronic ND-filter
I'm convinced a full-frame equivalent is coming next year (probably C90) but electronic ND might be patented by Sony (not sure).
Having Super35 with a speedbooster option is much better for multiple things. You can use Super35 glass which is the majority of cinema lenses, you can use stills crop lenses, and also you have more reach when you need it, it's just more versatile. And for the eND, I already said it, but 7 stops of ND is not enough for anything larger than f2.8 lenses on a sunny day, or even any daylight/snow covered exterior. So if you want to use primes, and everyone should do that, FX6 is just a camera without the internal NDs. C70 has 10 stops and you can even use f1.0 lenses with that. ISO changes are gradual anyway so you can have similar effect but with 10 stops of ND. It also has AutoISO for the first time in Cinema EOS camera, and it has plugin power for 3.5mm and now every microphone works to the smallest ones.
@@vladimirtalijan You make good points.
But we also want to use the new RF lenses without a crop. With the super 35 crop, there's currently nothing wider than 24mm.
And low-light performance suffers from the small sensor.
So while you might be right in that the electronic 7 stops ND isn't enough for prime lenses, we still need a full-frame sensor at some point.
Canon already have it in their C500 (but for EF, not RF).
@@TerraThink Yeah, but RF lenses are much better than anything Sony has, Sony lenses should be compared to the EF ones, which are still better, with much better choice and less money, so that should be the comparison. Also, I like EF lenses more, they have a mechanical focus ring which is much better than fly by wire. There is no perfect camera but C70 is much closer to it than FX6.
What about the menu systems, and which one can you pick up and use right away?
Matt the legend :) There are more things to clear up, but one is very important and obvious for me, but seems like almost no one is realizing that 7 stop NDs are not enough for anything larger than f2.8, so if you use primes, and you should, you still need to have NDs like you don't have eNDs at all. You need at least 10 stops for primes and guess who has it :)
What you said about the c70 AF with the speed booster/adaptor. That makes no sense.
The booster is just another lens along with the multiple lenses in the main lens.
It shouldn’t make any difference at all to the AF performance. (As long as the adapted lens and camera are communicating ok, and the Focus motors are fast and responsive.)
I think there maybe some mixup on that point.
Great vid otherwise.
Matt, any thoughts on the FX3?
so....MATT,You choice is FX6!
c70 or fx6 ,which is better in low light please??
Fx6
Nice video. I still went with the C70, but I think you make some interesting points.
Kyle, I'm at the stage of deciding. Can you share why you went that route? Is this your only camera or did you also pick a Bcam? I need two but not the same level.
the XLR issue on the handles isn't a major issue if you have used the the Canon C300MKII before. It has the same issue, sooo not that big of a deal.
C70 looks great.
it is great
Great video Matt, thank you! Something worth mentioning in my opinion is that I wouldn't choose to add an adapter to get a full frame like sensor but introduce colour shifts. I just always prefer to not use adapters because they do have an effect on the image. To me the extra reach you get from the super 35 sensor is convenient and more versatile.
Sometimes it's funny to get caught in these conversations between full frame and super 35 sensors at such a low level of cinematography when most multi million $ budget Hollywood shows aren't even shot on full frame cameras haha
Fantastic buyers guide! I don't have Canon or Sony lenses and my primary use case is business owner interviews incorporating b-roll demonstrating what they do. Nothing uncontrolled live like brides walking down the aisle. My conclusion after watching your analysis (despite the reservations of messrs Undone and Bloom) is get the FX6
I think I heard your kid in the background lol I thought it was my little son for a second.
Ohhhh Matt. This is exciting hehe
I like how quickly you get to the information...thank you
New here. Great video man. What about the ISO on the C70? I've heard the FX6 has a very high ISO without noise! Thanks!
I like the image of c70 more. They added the option of raw. The thing I would love to see in this camera is a 4:3 sensor for shooting anamorphic, a built in variable electronic ND like sony has, and the update eye af. Than I would definitelly buy this camera. And looking at Sony I would like the FX6 to have the same sensor as the FX9 also in 4:3 with the option to shoot open gate at 120 fps
I think honestly would make a new camera that is like FX6/9 with internal recording of ProRes 4444 that would be incredible, or it's X-OCN format (just something less expensive than the Venice, I'd pay 20k for a good middle camera)