I can’t figure out why Yamaha doesn’t offer a factory turbo. They use generally the same engine in the snowmobile application with a factory turbo. Typical Yamaha leaving it up to the aftermarket.
@@jamiemagdeleyns9152 Ski Doo uses the 900 motor in turbo form in the snowmobile line. It’s not even in the same league against the Yamaha version. Both stock turbos the Yamaha runs 6-8 lbs boost to achieve 205-206 HP, the Ski Doo was dyno’d around 192 in it’s latest version but to get that power they are running 16-18lbs boost. So it’s easy to see once in the hands of the outfits that flash them which has more potential with stock engine components. I have buddies running 350 HP on pump gas on their Yamaha’s.
I have been very happy with my yamaha, that 2 second difference is about 2 car lengths at the sand dunes. Way cheaper, but it needs around $1000 in suspension work to keep up. It looks a lot better with a aftermarket cage. The transmission is the highlight, it's so much more fun to bang through the gears and have full control over your drivetrain. That's really why I chose it over the others.
Packard performance got over 600 horse out of their sand drag YXZ. I own an identical one to what you have here. Hands down the most fun sxs on the market
I'd rather have the reliability of a solid drivetrain over a slightly faster 0-60. Every one of these belt driven vehicles I've seen having problems. Plus it's way more fun banging through gears IMO. Gives you that old-school offroading feel where you've gotta put in work to be fast, not just put your foot to the floor and hold on. Plus, I've had a Rhino 700 since 2008 with nearly 20k miles on it. Granted it's belt driven too, but it doesn't have the power to really stress it much. Never once broke a belt and the original belt from the showroom floor lasted nearly 13 years. That thing is a fucking tank and I drive it pretty hard(within reason) for being stock. The only thing I've had to do to it is replace the exhaust because the headers cracked after 12 years when one of the mufflers came loose. Other than that it's just been tires, oil and air filter. Yamaha builds one hell of a reliable machine & when I'm far out in the desert, reliability is king.
Buying a new Can Am 2022 Rs Turbo 200hp model . Great real world comparison and shuts down all the BS with the Polaris guys . Does anyone else think Polaris sound hideous
They make 195 (Can Am) and 181 (Polaris) to the motor, with the drivetrain loss, 155 and 147 arnt too bad of numbers to the wheels, especially for how little they weigh
@@Luis_Garcia-yc4mf is not bad , but when you see so many making around 165-169 at the wheel in stock form you know something is not right on the test.
@@bubbabelaire6422 im clear on that, but in this video they are not comparing tunes,and if in stock form you have traction issue,when modded will be worse and will not show the real gains.
That was not a fair comparison the two other ones have a turbo in them the yxz is Naturally aspirated making 70hp less then the Polaris &Can-am horsepower . If they put a gt1241 from Garrett or Borg Warner kit on it or at least 100 shot of nitrous to be even close to stock Yamaha but yes Yamaha for life all day long no rubber band worry about and people say the Yamaha it looks cheap I think it’s more higher quality than the Can-Am or Polaris I don’t know how many times I see broken parts on both the only thing I ever broke on my YXz is the front axle. People are just dumb they don’t understand the economy knowing that they’re getting ripped off and paying $15grand over the price because they don’t know how to put on a turbo kit. You pay a premium for upgrades suspension performance whatever Yamaha has fox shocks on it they’re namebrand Yamaha‘s been around longer and both of them when it comes to power sports I believe yamaha has high quality checks from the factory then can am and Polaris. I just don’t like seeing people rag on about the Yamaha I love rowing gears in it and I will never let it go I have 5500 miles on mine and it’s still going with gt1241 turbo Journal bearings.With ftecu fuel tune the turbo starts spooling at 2,000 rpm enough said…
If the YXZs didn’t look so ugly and cheap I might consider one. Like the transmission better than a CVT. Which Honda would come out swinging with a turbo model DCT that’s low slung like the X3. It would be a winner and a game changer. They been playing modest for way to long.
Slicks? Nitrous? Weight savings. Would really like to see these dogs either from the factory or modded with double, triple, quadruple the power levels they are at now. If the rubber band tranny can't take it; put in a gear box or hydraulic unit.
You didn't pop the can-am like you did the Polaris. You didn't test the can am leaving with rpm raised. I know the can am can beat the Polaris by a faster time than that.
What I am saying is if you would have did the samething with the can-am reved it then popped it like you did with Polaris it would have been even faster
The yxz ss with the sequential and 3 cylinders all the way!! The pol and the doo sound like my push mower. Yam has Much better fit, finish and quality. My 2 cents
I don't understand why those shitty CVT / torque convertors are the standard on performance side by sides. Why not give them actual transmissions like the YXZ.
As a previous owner of a yxz of almost 4 years , when you blow your cluch or transmission your done . When you blow a belt your back on the trail in a few minutes. I only blew a clutch once ,but it was on the first day of a week long snow trip so I ended up passenger in a rzr for th whole trip
@@joshuacatron2 That is not an thing, at least not since the 80's. Virtually the entire automotive industry is using turbo auto-shifted powertrains. Never mind a 911 Turbo S, how about a VW GTI?
I've had yxz and I have an x3 rr now. Good and bad to both. Depends on application, having the option is the best. With a sequential transmission and someone that can drive it, or the sport shift, lag between shifts isn't an issue. The gears are close together and you can shift fast
Answer is who cares. Which one of these is great on the trails, great on the rocks, and built beefy enough to hold up and not break you? Answer: None of these..think KRX.
Pro R is non turbo, naturally aspirated, but that wasn't in this video Pro XP is a turbocharged 2 cylinder, less than 1000cc We compared the highest tier vehicle that each manufacturer had to offer, whatever that may be. If Yamaha had a faster/higher performance model, we would have used that one in the test, but we used the best they had to offer, just like we did with the other 2 manufacturers.
What’s impressive is that the Yamaha does that with no turbo, ultimate reliability and speed/ performance at its best
We love a good "glass half full" attitude. The power of positive thinking is hard to beat!
I can’t figure out why Yamaha doesn’t offer a factory turbo. They use generally the same engine in the snowmobile application with a factory turbo. Typical Yamaha leaving it up to the aftermarket.
@@tdavidg9176 if you get a gytr turbo you’ll still have warranty and I’m sure it will be faster than the two
@@tdavidg9176 but they should definitely give a n/a version and a turbo version to buy
@@jamiemagdeleyns9152 Ski Doo uses the 900 motor in turbo form in the snowmobile line. It’s not even in the same league against the Yamaha version. Both stock turbos the Yamaha runs 6-8 lbs boost to achieve 205-206 HP, the Ski Doo was dyno’d around 192 in it’s latest version but to get that power they are running 16-18lbs boost. So it’s easy to see once in the hands of the outfits that flash them which has more potential with stock engine components. I have buddies running 350 HP on pump gas on their Yamaha’s.
I have been very happy with my yamaha, that 2 second difference is about 2 car lengths at the sand dunes.
Way cheaper, but it needs around $1000 in suspension work to keep up. It looks a lot better with a aftermarket cage.
The transmission is the highlight, it's so much more fun to bang through the gears and have full control over your drivetrain. That's really why I chose it over the others.
I would like to see a fair comparison like a turbo on the yxz
All these side by side comparison videos show drag racing on the street, I wana see them drag race up a 45 degree mountain in a sandstorm
I picked up a 2021 yxz and haven't looked back. The driving experience is like primal rage. Clutch car all the way.
For the money, ease of maintenance, reliability and fun factor, I’m for the Yamaha all the way!
Every poor dude says that
Packard performance got over 600 horse out of their sand drag YXZ. I own an identical one to what you have here. Hands down the most fun sxs on the market
I'd rather have the reliability of a solid drivetrain over a slightly faster 0-60. Every one of these belt driven vehicles I've seen having problems. Plus it's way more fun banging through gears IMO. Gives you that old-school offroading feel where you've gotta put in work to be fast, not just put your foot to the floor and hold on. Plus, I've had a Rhino 700 since 2008 with nearly 20k miles on it. Granted it's belt driven too, but it doesn't have the power to really stress it much. Never once broke a belt and the original belt from the showroom floor lasted nearly 13 years. That thing is a fucking tank and I drive it pretty hard(within reason) for being stock. The only thing I've had to do to it is replace the exhaust because the headers cracked after 12 years when one of the mufflers came loose. Other than that it's just been tires, oil and air filter. Yamaha builds one hell of a reliable machine & when I'm far out in the desert, reliability is king.
Granny shifting that yxz and almost positive you weren’t even close to reving it out to where it really performs
The X3 is crazy fast even without street tires!
Sick video man!
Awesome video can't wait to see the mods
Would like to see if there is a big difference with the YXZ 1000r XTR SS stock times vs clutch.
Great content keep the good quality
Thanks for watching!
@@realstreetperformance 🛑🛑 GET THE STAGE 2 UPGRADE FROM ALBA RACING FOR THE YAMAHA🛑🛑🛑
I’d take the YXZ hands down!
Why
@@flight2k5 reliability no belt issues funner to drive although it’s kinda ugly
@@Noobtubeguy krx is reliable 🤣 as far as funner to drive that’s your opinion.
Yea I went with the yxz over the can and and Polaris.. it’s way more fun to rack through the gears in the tight trails
Me too you not gonna go that fast in trails end the difference on the price is a lot
What size tires did each machine have and does the dyno correct for any differences?
Buying a new Can Am 2022 Rs Turbo 200hp model . Great real world comparison and shuts down all the BS with the Polaris guys . Does anyone else think Polaris sound hideous
Poo and yammie look like they are from the 80s compared to x3
Lots of angles on the X3. Best part is, you can crash and it won’t look any different.
Watching the gauges on the pro when it was on the dyno, it looked like you have some belt slip.
What Turbo kit is the YXZ getting?
That was awesome Where's the next video??
Coming soon! We go on an adventure, and then the mods begin. Thanks for watching!
Canam 155 and rzr 147 was pretty low,for sure they are spinning tires.will be nice to test them with some street tires,great job boys.
They make 195 (Can Am) and 181 (Polaris) to the motor, with the drivetrain loss, 155 and 147 arnt too bad of numbers to the wheels, especially for how little they weigh
@@Luis_Garcia-yc4mf is not bad , but when you see so many making around 165-169 at the wheel in stock form you know something is not right on the test.
@@mandytuning yea the problem is the other dynos, it’s the gains you have to watch
@@bubbabelaire6422 im clear on that, but in this video they are not comparing tunes,and if in stock form you have traction issue,when modded will be worse and will not show the real gains.
That was not a fair comparison the two other ones have a turbo in them the yxz is Naturally aspirated making 70hp less then the Polaris &Can-am horsepower . If they put a gt1241 from Garrett or Borg Warner kit on it or at least 100 shot of nitrous to be even close to stock Yamaha but yes Yamaha for life all day long no rubber band worry about and people say the Yamaha it looks cheap I think it’s more higher quality than the Can-Am or Polaris I don’t know how many times I see broken parts on both the only thing I ever broke on my YXz is the front axle. People are just dumb they don’t understand the economy knowing that they’re getting ripped off and paying $15grand over the price because they don’t know how to put on a turbo kit. You pay a premium for upgrades suspension performance whatever Yamaha has fox shocks on it they’re namebrand Yamaha‘s been around longer and both of them when it comes to power sports I believe yamaha has high quality checks from the factory then can am and Polaris. I just don’t like seeing people rag on about the Yamaha I love rowing gears in it and I will never let it go I have 5500 miles on mine and it’s still going with gt1241 turbo Journal bearings.With ftecu fuel tune the turbo starts spooling at 2,000 rpm enough said…
Dyno graph overlay please !
Well of course the x3 is going to win its the only one with turbo no brainer. Good video
Polaris is factory turbocharged as well. We took the top tier model from each manufacturer so we were comparing the best that each brand had to offer
I think a better video would be which one will last the longest. ...... Yamaha
Yup 100%
Yamaha no turbo
Guaranteed the Yamaha. We currently have a can am atv and it's one issue after the other, especially electrical issues. Never again!
Hard to break something with 90hp
Yamaha Can't figure out how to produce enough power to break anything
If the YXZs didn’t look so ugly and cheap I might consider one. Like the transmission better than a CVT. Which Honda would come out swinging with a turbo model DCT that’s low slung like the X3. It would be a winner and a game changer. They been playing modest for way to long.
Yeah I'm waiting to see a Talon turbo
So where is the follow up build video?
What was the torque for the can am?
The can am was 4.8 brake to gas I was hoping to see what it would have been if you left line with rpm
It would have been a smoked belt lol
The Polaris was 5.21 not 5.14. 5.14 was when you left line with high rpm 5.21 was brake to gas
Pt 2?
Yeah you over brake torqued the pro. I got a best of 4.75 in my stock pro spinning in 4wd bc I had the tires at 30lbs
I guess this whole project no longer has a pulse?
Yxz u shift without letting the throttle go? Thats interesting
Slicks? Nitrous? Weight savings. Would really like to see these dogs either from the factory or modded with double, triple, quadruple the power levels they are at now. If the rubber band tranny can't take it; put in a gear box or hydraulic unit.
Packard make some 700 hp YXZ's. And it doesn't have "rubberbands".
We need to update video.
comin right up
The can am you just went from brake to gas on the 0 to 60
Should find a yxz with a turbo on it and run it again. 103 hp againt 168hp and up machines
Our YXZ is getting a turbo kit installed, stay tuned to see what we can get out of it.
Like it can am the best
You didn't pop the can-am like you did the Polaris. You didn't test the can am leaving with rpm raised. I know the can am can beat the Polaris by a faster time than that.
hey guys if ya wanna know anything about the side by sides u need 2 contact SXS here on youtube
Thanks for joining the conversation Chris!
To bad y’all didn’t add in the Honda Talon.
coming soon!
What I am saying is if you would have did the samething with the can-am reved it then popped it like you did with Polaris it would have been even faster
Way to smoke the belt on that rzr
The yxz ss with the sequential and 3 cylinders all the way!! The pol and the doo sound like my push mower. Yam has Much better fit, finish and quality. My 2 cents
The Polaris you reved then took off from 0 to 60
yah we tried it several ways, it still lost no matter what we tried :(
196whp
I picked the Yamaha because long after the canned ham and pull your ass blow up it will still be running perfectly.
Apples and oranges.
This Is why I chose can am over polaris their belts and clutches just can't hadle it 🤷🏽♂️🤣
Should have had a RZR PRO R for there for shits and giggles
kinda redundant testing two turbo cars against a NA car. especially when can am and polaris have NA models as well.
Where's my one and only sexy goat Jay at?! 😭
out at the salt flats! video coming soon!
Belts are sooo old now. Time to move on.
Can am will always be the fastest Ik the slowest too it’s polaris
I don't understand why those shitty CVT / torque convertors are the standard on performance side by sides. Why not give them actual transmissions like the YXZ.
As a previous owner of a yxz of almost 4 years , when you blow your cluch or transmission your done . When you blow a belt your back on the trail in a few minutes. I only blew a clutch once ,but it was on the first day of a week long snow trip so I ended up passenger in a rzr for th whole trip
I would assume the turbo lag between gears would play a role in performance 🤔
@@joshuacatron2 That is not an thing, at least not since the 80's. Virtually the entire automotive industry is using turbo auto-shifted powertrains. Never mind a 911 Turbo S, how about a VW GTI?
I've had yxz and I have an x3 rr now. Good and bad to both. Depends on application, having the option is the best.
With a sequential transmission and someone that can drive it, or the sport shift, lag between shifts isn't an issue. The gears are close together and you can shift fast
Poor Talon and KRX getting ignored
For good reason, they are looking for HP and speed lol
Both those machines are slower. But that KRX is quit the performer when it comes to off road capability.
so the top model can-am vs top model ploaris vs base model yamaha? ok then
😂 i know
Can-am all the way
No wildcat XX
Same engine as the yxz, but belt drive
Holy crap a camry is faster than the yamaha
Answer is who cares. Which one of these is great on the trails, great on the rocks, and built beefy enough to hold up and not break you? Answer: None of these..think KRX.
change name to jayytechtipsyt would be gamer jk uwu
You cheated with the razor
Stupid test.
Pro r has 225 hp 2000cc turbo motor.
X3 has 180hp turbo
Yamaha has 112hp.
No turbo.
Try the non turbo models against the yxz1000r
Idiots
Pro R is non turbo, naturally aspirated, but that wasn't in this video
Pro XP is a turbocharged 2 cylinder, less than 1000cc
We compared the highest tier vehicle that each manufacturer had to offer, whatever that may be. If Yamaha had a faster/higher performance model, we would have used that one in the test, but we used the best they had to offer, just like we did with the other 2 manufacturers.
All the poor people commenting on how good their yamaha is
Blahahahahaaaa
Where I hunt, they're both slow
hey noah, im not sure what you meant, but i appreciate you commenting! thanks for watching!
@@realstreetperformance I mean, you can't get a monster truck thru Jerusalem, Ar. woods over 2mph!
@@noahgrady3628 ah! you should come visit FL! we have some fast trails here!
@@realstreetperformance I'd love to, but rather be using a bow in an air boat!
@@noahgrady3628 how about both!?
Yxz is so slow, and rides like a skateboard 🤣
Way overpriced for a not as good chassis and only 90wheel
@@therowdyboysnetwork2827 Some people like the durability.
@@cleverusernamecl5532 the yxzs don’t have any less issues
@@therowdyboysnetwork2827 ok👌
@@therowdyboysnetwork2827 no belt issues actually since it’s gear driven