A Do-it-all Rifle Optic

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.8K

  • @nicks9541
    @nicks9541 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1367

    I finally, after years of watching Garand Thumb, Lucas and countless other gun TH-camrs rave about LPVOs bought my first one just a couple months ago. 30 seconds later the entire Internet has decided LPVOs are trash…

    • @TREXARMS
      @TREXARMS  2 ปีที่แล้ว +556

      Not trash, but definitely with limitations. Run that LPVO regardless.

    • @grilin18.
      @grilin18. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +133

      competetion shooters still vastly prefer lpvo and special forces are just now widely rolling out lpvos, so don't feel bad, but they have become a bit too normal for good social media engagement. I think within 5 years we will be seeing lpvo's with acog durability and similarly streamlined bdc's, and the current acog revival will fade but with people thinking about supply lines more these past few years questions about durability in the gun world have gotten more common.

    • @robertalford1321
      @robertalford1321 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      I did the same thing when the PA Raptor 1-6 debuted some time ago. I was getting really comfortable with a red dot + magnifier setup, but jumped the LPVO shark because the internet told me I was missing out...and I immediately regretted it. Since then I've noticed lots of RMRs and T-2s being mounted up top 1-6 LPVOs at the 12 o clock position, and it makes perfect sense to try that setup or the suggested ACOG (less weight) if you want it all.

    • @dutbud9049
      @dutbud9049 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      They aren't trash, but just realize that they aren't perfect and do have downsides, like everything does.

    • @captureoutdoormedia
      @captureoutdoormedia 2 ปีที่แล้ว +82

      They all release videos on the same products for a reason. $$

  • @zubysaboss1062
    @zubysaboss1062 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2272

    Canada just tabled legislation to ban all semi automatic centerfire guns that take detachable magazines. Highly likely to pass. Just wanted to vent my frustration in the comments

    • @senorFrog2032
      @senorFrog2032 2 ปีที่แล้ว +218

      My condolences, RIP my guy

    • @chemistryofquestionablequa6252
      @chemistryofquestionablequa6252 2 ปีที่แล้ว +253

      Canada is dying quickly, it's not the country I grew up in anymore. It's sad and part of why I left.

    • @PandemicGameplay
      @PandemicGameplay 2 ปีที่แล้ว +261

      Stop venting it in comments and go protest it. You are the reason you are losing your own rights. Organize and group up.

    • @Mediiiicc
      @Mediiiicc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +221

      @@PandemicGameplay didn't work for the truckers

    • @TheFunkyHalfMexican
      @TheFunkyHalfMexican 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@PandemicGameplay No, Tyrants and Globalists like Trudeau is why they are losing their rights. Protesting ain't going to accomplish much if someone like that rules the land

  • @BombproofCraftsman
    @BombproofCraftsman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +126

    ACOG’s are bomb proof! Me & my gun got shredded by an ied. The acog was the only one to fight another day.

    • @evanstroud
      @evanstroud 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Thanks for your service!

    • @apostle4122
      @apostle4122 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Sick name can’t lie

    • @mitchellsheridan5252
      @mitchellsheridan5252 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Jeez, that’s metal af. Thank you for your service and I love your username 😂🤙

    • @BombproofCraftsman
      @BombproofCraftsman 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@mitchellsheridan5252 thanks brother! Best times of my life were serving for the people of the USA 🇺🇸

    • @kennystallings530
      @kennystallings530 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Shit like this is the reason I bought an ACOG. Thank you for your service, sir!

  • @PastorDr.MartinSsempa
    @PastorDr.MartinSsempa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +298

    The bdc helping people who have very little experience shooting at distance is definitely a thing. Before I bought my TA-31d I had 0 experience past 200 yards. I was able to consistently get hits at 350 and 530 yards on a reduced c zone target once I got my wind hold figured out.

    • @Brian--0311
      @Brian--0311 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Just remember...
      Any fite you can run from is a fite you survive!
      I can see a lot of excellent shewters going down early because they engaged targets they could have run from. Use discernment and intelligence! For the Best chance of survival

    • @philpeterson7182
      @philpeterson7182 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@Brian--0311 The French said the same thing

    • @Brian--0311
      @Brian--0311 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@philpeterson7182 Nobody is stopping you from running head long into battle! You go brave man!

    • @bokiNYC
      @bokiNYC 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@philpeterson7182 😂😂👍

    • @nvgboiyes6386
      @nvgboiyes6386 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You’re right, avoiding engagement is the best response. Of course when you do have the fight and caught in a situation. Good the be prepared.

  • @SuperHeatherrussell
    @SuperHeatherrussell 2 ปีที่แล้ว +161

    ACOG is what I used the entire time I was in the army 2 deployments and even without the rmr you can use it for CQB if you train with it but I am still getting a rmr for mine. I see people jump on all of these fads and I just stick to what I know. ACOG is more rugged that just about any other optic, you get a good ass field of view, it doesn't need batteries so it would still work if we got hit by an EMP or shtf and stuff wasn't available, and anyone can hit targets out to300 meters with it.

    • @Osprey1994
      @Osprey1994 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I would caution using the term fad when it comes to LPVO's. They have been around for quite some time and if anything they have solidified their place in the competition circuit. Additionally there are military units making good use of LPVO's so it's by no means a fad. The pace with which the companies seem to be iterating upon their designs is pretty cool, and I look forward to seeing what will be available to the average consumer in another few years.

    • @Ashton_Speaks
      @Ashton_Speaks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Yeah acogs are crazy. Watching trash regular army shooters ( cooks, dental hygienists, covid era privates in the infantry) literally double their rifle qual score just by putting one on. Still miss targets cause they cant reload or clear a malfunction. Bit still literally double their score. See it literally every time i do a rifle qual range.

    • @Howard.94
      @Howard.94 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @Jon M an EMP is not a nuke.

    • @MajorChipHazard1
      @MajorChipHazard1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@Howard.94 But a nuke is an EMP...

    • @charlesknowles7936
      @charlesknowles7936 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agree! I just commented about running my two acogs through 5 different training classes over the years and haven't had any issues shooting cqb drills.

  • @Duden1337
    @Duden1337 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I run this exact ACOG on my rifle, sans RMR. Little known fact, between the optic and the mount there is a tube that lets you see all the way down your rifle. It's a backup sight, even labeled as so in the booklet it comes with. Great optic, worth every $

  • @DJ-jq8if
    @DJ-jq8if 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    For new shooters or people that don’t shoot often, this acog and the barrel length and bullets it’s designed for is the best thing anyone could do.

  • @SOCMMOB
    @SOCMMOB 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I appreciate this video. I’ve been drowning in LPVO info for over two years. I forgot how good and clear the ACOG is, and completely forgot there was an LED model.

  • @ryuhadouken2722
    @ryuhadouken2722 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    The stadia lines in the acog also can be used as a range finder. The stadia lines from 200meters and up cover the shoulder length of a average man of 19 inches shoulder length. You can roughly estimate the distance and therefore engage a target accurately up to 500 meters.

  • @johndoee12345
    @johndoee12345 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I’m so happy about this video. I’ve been running an acog rmr combo the last few months. Was running the razr LPVO but it was just so heavy

  • @InfernoPhilM
    @InfernoPhilM 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I just put my LPVO on and went to the range today. I had a great time.

  • @superfamilyallosauridae6505
    @superfamilyallosauridae6505 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    ACOG has existed since like 1987, in general, which is just mindboggling. 35 years!

  • @50StichesSteel
    @50StichesSteel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Best thing about an Acog is the field of view when compared to LPVO . Moving targets are easy to track and weight is night and day.. Upclose you just super impose that Chevron both eyes open. I would only need to use an RMR if I had an extra laying around...Buy used too. They are tanks. Your brightness may be lower if it's older but this is why they make battery powered instead.

    • @lllilililililililililll
      @lllilililililililililll 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      field of view?
      oh you mean turn the lpvo down to the right level instead of all the way on or all the way off

    • @50StichesSteel
      @50StichesSteel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Mike Rodix Yes Field of View...The size of the area viewed at the same power level...Prisms give a wider FOV at the same power level just because of what they are. It also has less scope shadow so you can get in a more awkward shooting position and see more

  • @gregr3283
    @gregr3283 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    I have old eyes and appreciate the higher magnification of the LPVO at distance. Cost is a factor too, ACOGs are twice the price or more. I run a 1-8 with an offset red dot for close range. Works well for range and home defense.

    • @troyshaffer1229
      @troyshaffer1229 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Acogs aren't twice the price of a comparable quality LVPO, its just that the low end LVPOS get cheaper than ACOGS...

    • @johnnyfabish528
      @johnnyfabish528 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Do a lot of home defending do you?

    • @noThing-wd6py
      @noThing-wd6py ปีที่แล้ว

      @@troyshaffer1229 TA02 is 2k€ in Germany 🙃Razor Gen 2 1-6 is 1.7k€

    • @asymsolutions
      @asymsolutions ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @noThing not comparable on quality. The HD is vortex's good stuff which is twice as much.
      Also second focal plane, meaning your MOA or MRAD reticle is only true for holdover at 6x.
      You're not getting a comparible quality LVPO to the acog at acog prices. If you want the adjustability of a LVPO, either accept that you're getting worse glass and durability, or expect to pay far more for a first focal plane LVPO with the same quality glass and internals.

    • @cbrobinson10
      @cbrobinson10 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@asymsolutions Jesus it's LPVO lol

  • @TsunTzu
    @TsunTzu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Through a ton of trial and error, I figured out what worked best for me as a general do-it-all type setup- Magnifier and Holo or Dot. Romeo4s and 8s or Eotechs with the extra dots are nice for longer range options in that format. Just my eyes that suck with LPVO diopters since they don't seem to be that strong generally (magnifiers are fine, oddly) and I have a requirement that I need to be able to use the optics if I lose my glasses.
    Try stuff yourself, don't just listen to folks on the internet or youtube videos. You're an individual person with needs specific to you. Local gun stores will often let you look at stuff without buying.

  • @TheDrDover
    @TheDrDover ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Just purchased a TA110-D-100496 for this very reason. Looked and looked and looked. Finally just went with the 3.5x LED ACOG with crosshairs. Perfect for what I will be doing with it.

  • @R3kkr
    @R3kkr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +103

    TA02 is very popular in Norwegian SOF units, availability of AA batteries, and the red dot on top and front for passive NVG is really nice :D

    • @mechbest8685
      @mechbest8685 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      When is Daddy GarandThumb going to talk about how Thicc Lucas is getting?

    • @Hadouken5150
      @Hadouken5150 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@mechbest8685 just stop.

  • @michaelledbetter598
    @michaelledbetter598 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The last 60 seconds of your video just sold a TAO2 RMR combo. Don't care what the price is, it's over! Thanks for the video. I started buying Trijicon "everything" about 18 months ago and that's all she wrote. Semper-Fi

  • @f3uibeghardt522
    @f3uibeghardt522 2 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    There's actually a 4x32 ACOG on Sarah Conner's AR in Terminator 2 when she tries to snipe that scientist at his home, so ACOGs are much older than 20 years. I think 1989 is when they first became a thing.

    • @lucaswoods1155
      @lucaswoods1155 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      87 pretty close

    • @kazager11
      @kazager11 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Time travel....duh!

    • @stevegillespie6424
      @stevegillespie6424 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ok, now I gotta watch T2 again. Damn it's been a long time!

    • @JHMNSFTFAD
      @JHMNSFTFAD 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think he’s talking about how long they’ve been in service which was around 1995. So still 30 plus years.

    • @kalanipitmon7817
      @kalanipitmon7817 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mf miles dyson!

  • @betovargas2098
    @betovargas2098 2 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    I’ve seen ACOGs more and more nowadays! Based optic

  • @Teufels_hunde
    @Teufels_hunde 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Solid and logical points in this video. Comes down to what you have and what you have trained with too. ACOGs are awesome with obvious limitations. A Red dot with a magnifier is probably even more versatile in many ways but also has limitations. Never ran a LPVO due to never being issued one, the price point, and weight (mainly the price point because everything is expensive). But i have trained with ACOGs for years. Its what I know and have had the most training on. And that's how everyone should view their equipment, no matter the optics, if thats what you have or can afford, run it, train with it. Is an ACOG the best, absolutely not, is it going to work when i need it, absolutely yes! As for durability, im sure LPVOs will start rolling out with the same durability as an ACOG and with more streamline BDCs in the future. Especially since the USMC is looking into moving away from the ACOG. With military interest comes funding, which in turn funds more R&D and innovation. Perks of obtaining that blank check from the DoD. At the end of the day its all about what you have and what you train with. I do love the controversy and constant banter back and forth about ACOGs vs LPVOs vs Dot with a Magnifier though. Its interesting how the industry and media goes back and forth every few years. Almost like the gun industry wants you to feel like you have to buy their latest and greatest or the most trending thing at that time.

  • @JJheadcharge
    @JJheadcharge 2 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    I first started questioning LPVOs when Garand Thumb reviewed one and basically said "I pretty much leave it at 6x and use the offset RMR for close in." ACOG with RMR just seems like a more practical option. Not as versatile as an LPVO but certainly more practical.

  • @ChipSpencer123
    @ChipSpencer123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Primary Arms 1-6, etc w/ACSS reticle (BDC) FFP has worked for me. Good points & good suggestion.

  • @KaizenLife
    @KaizenLife ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This was a great argument and convinced me to buy the exact same setup just now. Love your channel and appreciate all the great info you share.

  • @oskar6661
    @oskar6661 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I ran some ACOGs while on duty, and it's one of the only optics that never disappointed me. However, our station had several of the smaller, lighter 2x ACOGs and those were my favourite. Plenty of magnification for what I was likely to be doing, and yet still very useful in close distances. Was minimal enough you didn't need to run an auxiliary 1x dot, etc. Also the eye-relief was great on the 2x. However, as a non-agency guy now I can't justify the $900+ they want for them. I'm surprised that a 2x market doesn't really exist in combat optics. I was a big fan.

    • @benrent6625
      @benrent6625 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I know I'm late to the partyyyy but u should check out primary arms 2x prism and 2.5x prism optics. Just mounted on to my carry handle, it's pretty good so far. Worth a try I'd say if u can get them on sale

    • @joshcarter-com
      @joshcarter-com ปีที่แล้ว

      Sig also makes “bravo” optics in fixed 3, 4, and 5x. I can’t speak to how good they are but the 3x looks appealing for exactly the reason you’re talking about.

  • @Metallica8589
    @Metallica8589 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I had an ACOG in the Army and I found it easier to use than my 1-6 Razor I got later for my personal rifle when I got out. Pretty sure it was designed under the Army's "nose to charging handle" cheek weld/sight picture and it worked for me no issue.

  • @ucms4103
    @ucms4103 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Trex arms philosophy on the acog is exactly the same with mine when I bought mine! Its extremely simple and durable, not to mention light. Got the one from primary arms with the ACSS recital, I wish they make a LED model. I can say in agreement they are one of the best out there. The 20+ years of service in the military reflects that as well as my personal experience with them!

    • @sillybilly121212
      @sillybilly121212 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      crazy light for as old as it is. honestly the acog was way ahead of its time and is still relevant. I'd take it over any other optic.

    • @kinghunternick1365
      @kinghunternick1365 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why is it no longer available? Limited run?

    • @ucms4103
      @ucms4103 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kinghunternick1365 yeah, unfortunately it was one of those limited edition kind of deals they had.

  • @ryanmarsh2
    @ryanmarsh2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    This is exactly my setup for the last few years, which I took some heat for online. It’s pretty much what I ran in Iraq (minus the RMR).The thing most people don’t realize about optics on 5.56 is 99% of people cannot effectively engage targets with 5.56 at the range you’d need a 6x or greater optic. The ACOG is a 4x for a reason.

    • @user-gp4br7my4n
      @user-gp4br7my4n 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for your comments you won a gift ,hit me up on telegram

    • @squidy4082
      @squidy4082 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think having an eotech with a 5x magifier is pretty good too

    • @lllilililililililililll
      @lllilililililililililll 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I just like the 6x for the extra magnification at medium ranges

    • @ryanmarsh2
      @ryanmarsh2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@lllilililililililililll I feel you, it's situation dependent.

    • @MylesKillis
      @MylesKillis ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lllilililililililililll yup low percentage shots at shorter ranges is what i like them for

  • @swingnamiss8130
    @swingnamiss8130 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Got issued an RCO/ACOG in the Marines, Love my Razor HD but the tritium in Acogs are awesome. Not to mention bomb proof

  • @Slai47
    @Slai47 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I'm a nobody but I can say I called it! Prism sights and a canted/top red dot is an insanely versatile combo and has everything a person needs. Tanky and better than most people think. Also Lucas, thank you for also finally talking about the red dot magnifier, it's not a great setup for most things.

    • @boostav
      @boostav 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Red dot + magnifier does things better than ACOG + RMR.

    • @relevation0
      @relevation0 ปีที่แล้ว

      Like?

    • @Slai47
      @Slai47 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@boostav it does everything with 200% the effort

  • @gkft
    @gkft 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I've been ACOGgang since 2016 or so and I've never looked back. I have 3 of them, and unless my absolute priority is distance for the general use of a rifle (something like a full size cartridge DMR), I prefer an ACOG over an LPVO any day. I have an Elcan Specter DR thinking that it would be better than an ACOG being that it has the ability to go from 1 to 4x, but the added weight and cost make an ACOG with top mounted RMR still the cost effective and superior solution, especially for a rifle you're trying to keep the weight down on. It's not a perfect optic, but paired with an RMR it truly is the everyman's "do -it-all" capable optic.

  • @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz
    @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Ive been looking at the 3.5x ACOG for a while. The added eye relief and minimal FOV loss compared to the 4x makes it appealing to me. I still cant bring myself to ditch my EXPS3/Magnifier combo, and the next upper I'm doing is a MK12 Mod H-esqe upper so its getting a proper-ish 2.5-10x scope with a piggyback RDS.

    • @paddypibblet846
      @paddypibblet846 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It's not minimal trust me. You feel it.

  • @KingHeated
    @KingHeated 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I have a vortex strike eagle FFp 1-8x24 and yes, it can be a little more interesting-challenging when it comes to distance shooting rather than 25-100y. However, I bought an acog style Reddot and to be quite honest it has been some of the most comfortable shooting experience thus far, it feels natural, and yes, the weight difference is quite noticeable. I will keep my LPVO on my 16” rifle but I think for an 11.5” I will most definitely go for an acog 🤙🏽

  • @leanit5756
    @leanit5756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    ACOG is a non-starter for many because there is no diopter adjustment. Might be great if you are 25 or 30 and were born with good eyes, I was, but by my mid 40s these are an absolute no-go. Something you want to check before buying one! My go-to magnified is the VCOG for that reason - got to have the diopter adjustment so I can see the reticle.

    • @christopherg2218
      @christopherg2218 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Underrated comment. This adjustment can be really important in some cases

  • @benzerka6328
    @benzerka6328 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    You could sell a ketchup popsicle to a lady in a white dress.

  • @MrBullet888
    @MrBullet888 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Almost went with an ACOG and I'm not knocking it at all.
    I have ended up with 2 EoTechs, 1 Aimpoint, 1 prism and an LPVO with an offset RMR.
    Different rifles for different things and the LPVO is set to 5x. The RMR is an excellent tool for me and I can go out to a bit of distance with it but primarily it's for 75 yards and in.
    I will admit to being an EoTech fan for sure with me having 2 of them. I have the 2 dot set up on both and it's relatively easy to hit out to 300 yards.
    Love the Aimpoint also and it's just about as proven as the ACOG is. Just a simple dot but like the EoTech, eye relief and FOV are excellent.
    Great video Lucas.

  • @gatlinggunlover
    @gatlinggunlover 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Had a razor 1-6. A few months ago I decided I wanted to go with the TA02 + piggyback route for durability, simplicity, and weight. Running a ta-02 with a acro p-2 ontop. I absolutely love it. It's just really weird that after I made that switch, it seems like the acog is gaining traction again. It's such a good optic.

    • @georgeASD
      @georgeASD 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      acog its the way to go to me at least, many people dont understand simplicity and weight because you dont notice it in the range, but try carrying the gun all day long with a heavy scope and you get a reality check. l like my setups as light as l can, thats why l like irons or small red dots BUT, when it comes to precision, both stay short, so the ACOG fills the gap, by being both light and precise, not to mention the range markings that makes you land man sized hits faster than with a magnified scope. Its practical shooting not a sniper competition after all

  • @theroguenob
    @theroguenob 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Love my acogs I've used over the years issued and owned but I've been trying out the vortex prism 5x with the red dot on top and I really do enjoy it. You save an easy $300 but you lose out on some features but for a non nvg optic setup it's damn near perfect

    • @Kevin117
      @Kevin117 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      An adapter plate for the rmr footprint changes that on the vortex

    • @kolideoskope
      @kolideoskope 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Apparently the Steiner MPS comes with a mounting plate that will fit the Spitfire 5x.

  • @HalfHealth
    @HalfHealth 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    The KRAM spacer from Weapon Outfitters is a solid upgrade to pair with ACOGs too.

    • @p47plane
      @p47plane 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They just need to restock :/

    • @sneak916
      @sneak916 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I prefer having the dot on an offset if I have the KRAM on since it makes it a little too high for me. The KRAM is a great upgrade

    • @HiDragLowSpeed
      @HiDragLowSpeed 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@p47plane Good thing I got one 2 months back.

    • @Kingwolf_555
      @Kingwolf_555 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just got mine last week and it's a godsend for my ACOG.

    • @VladPutinsDad
      @VladPutinsDad 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      i prefer the unity COG mount. does what the KRAM spacer does with the added benefit of mounting your rmr offset instead of top mounted.

  • @gunchaman6848
    @gunchaman6848 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Acog is iconic and the best optic for me. It was diving into many entertainment media for a long time. It's never old.it's usable

  • @EM-od6gu
    @EM-od6gu ปีที่แล้ว

    The 6 minute gun drop and the music lol. Your seriously Knowledgeable and very entertaining!

  • @Freddie206
    @Freddie206 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I tried red dot with magnifier
    ,LPVO , 2x Prism Scope and now i switched to ACOG
    All of them are great depending on what application you are using them
    But acog is my favorite

    • @benrent6625
      @benrent6625 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      How was that 2x prism? I hated that I just wasn't bullseye shooting with my old red dot and lpvos I've been bullseye shooting. Butttt it is heavier.

    • @Freddie206
      @Freddie206 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@benrent6625 same here
      But very easy to pick the reticle
      It’s good fpr 50 yards imo

  • @vincentalbert317
    @vincentalbert317 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The acog is realy a good optic but for me the elcan specter in 1 to 4× is better for my do all riffle
    Thanks for your works it s a good video
    And greating from France 🙂

  • @p47plane
    @p47plane 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I've been using a T2/TA33 with the Corvus mount. It's got a few quirks but it's the best lightweight combo of NV capability and useful daytime optic I've found.

    • @p47plane
      @p47plane 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@flyingturtletx Yes

    • @dashdotdashdot8583
      @dashdotdashdot8583 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Been wanting to do a similar setup with a Ta02 and T2 riding on top with the acog directly mounted to the Corvus rail. How does the HOB feel for the red dot chin/cheek weld wise?

    • @p47plane
      @p47plane 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dashdotdashdot8583 Good cheek weld if you "roll" the rifle so you view the T2 through your left eye. Marginal chin weld if you view the T2 with your right eye, but that's fine for close range or passive NVG shooting.

  • @RenoMay
    @RenoMay 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Had a acog and various dot setup. Wanted to like it. Hated it. Sold it.

  • @nilknoc101
    @nilknoc101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Pretty much been tossing around the idea of running basically this setup for the past year. Haven't spent any big money on a rifle optic yet, but the ACOG is becoming increasingly appealing. Hop-and-friends seem to like it also, particularly the 3.5x. I don't have a problem running the offset red dot mount alongside a magnified prism optic.

    • @randyjohnson3654
      @randyjohnson3654 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Be careful some acogs have shit fov

    • @nilknoc101
      @nilknoc101 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@randyjohnson3654 probably way better than what I’ve got now… it would go on a 14.5 so really the best choice all things considered. Offset micro red dot would suffice I think for inside 50yds

  • @jeffb5781
    @jeffb5781 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for all your excellent videos! The teachings are great!

  • @magdumpmonday
    @magdumpmonday 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Have. TA31 RCOM. Mounted the RMR at a 45 really like the setup. Furthest real estate would permit was 500 meters but was able to hit often on a 6” x 12 target. Great optic.

  • @rpnbf8196
    @rpnbf8196 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    ACOGs are brutal on older eyes, but the primary arms 2x is sweet…the 3x looks like it’s getting good reviews

    • @ohioisastate8574
      @ohioisastate8574 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I may get the 3 x

    • @unashamedly1776
      @unashamedly1776 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      They just released a 5X at SHOT Show

    • @rpnbf8196
      @rpnbf8196 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@unashamedly1776 yep, looks tempting with the aurora reticle.

    • @BaumSquadm24
      @BaumSquadm24 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I got the 5x with the Aurora reticle and it is the tits.

  • @92naz32
    @92naz32 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Finally, I can agree with Lucas 100%. The ACOG is the combat optic that still rules them all. Small size, ruggedness, light weight, German glass, BDC, and ease of use are the reasons the Corps chose the TA31. Twenty years later this optic is still relevant. Also, the BAC works for CQB as long as you train using this method.

    • @poolee77
      @poolee77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      With the new LED models the BAC is even easier when you crank the brightness. I don't see anyone mentioning it but my TA02 is brighter than my CompM5

  • @PreparedAirman
    @PreparedAirman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Solid info. I'm glad you discussed this topic with the amount of subscribers and views you get. I said and filmed a video saying the same points. Many people fought me and thought I was nuts.

    • @tubeguy4066
      @tubeguy4066 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm exited for all the cheap LPVOs coming to tacswap within the next week lol

  • @bigz5262
    @bigz5262 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I have a Vortex Spitfire 5x piggybacked with a Venom and it’s way lighter than the LPVO I had on it. Probably not as durable as an ACOG but it was really easy to adjust to as well

    • @FreedomFest
      @FreedomFest ปีที่แล้ว

      How’s that set up workin for ya? I just ordered the same combo

    • @bigz5262
      @bigz5262 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FreedomFest I really like it! The 5x is etched so even if the battery dies you can still aim. The dot probably isn’t as good as just an an aimpoint or eotech but it works and it’s super easy to switch between the two

  • @protectpersevere2030
    @protectpersevere2030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I kinda want to switch to an acog with t2 on top someday… but for now my PA 1-8 with 507c on top puts in work. Primary arms lvpo are pretty durable and are like $300

  • @jeremymallari6504
    @jeremymallari6504 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The TA11 has a lot better relief and paired with a piggy-backed red dot it makes a great combo. Especially when you just tilt the red dot to your non-dominant eye versus lifting your head up. Makes the transition faster and you don’t lose your cheek weld.

    • @dcskating08
      @dcskating08 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s a worse optic. Bigger, clunkier, heavier, less FOV with less mag. People like it because it can hide training flaws.

    • @theimmortal4718
      @theimmortal4718 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I use the ta33. 3x and twice the eye relief of the ta31. With a green chevron, it's my favorite

  • @benthephilosopher
    @benthephilosopher 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Agreed that this is an awesome value combo. The only thing that I'd say has more value is my PA 3x Microprism on an ADM B2-C mount, plus a Holosun 407c on a T Rex Offset mount. Around $750 for all that and the whole package weighs 12oz. Insane value and insanely light.

  • @ThatGuy-kf7fo
    @ThatGuy-kf7fo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Larue RCO mount helps the eye relief too. It’s my go to setup.

  • @MegaAndy93
    @MegaAndy93 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My favorite rifle setup uses this optic: 16in BCM MK2 Upper w/ ELW CHF Barrel, Thunder Ranch Aero Lower, Geissele SSP Flat Bow, A5 Buffer system, BCM Furniture, and a ADM Cantilever ACOG mount (Titanium) to fix the eye relief with backup irons. Only clears Mbus Pro sights according to ADM so mileage may vary with other sights.

  • @nukkohuits17
    @nukkohuits17 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I remember the HAMR 4x with a top mounted RMR. That was about eight years ago... We've come full circle to that.

  • @Taylor_Smith37
    @Taylor_Smith37 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was finally one step ahead of Lucas on something. My crowning achievement.

  • @randomfishingguy5573
    @randomfishingguy5573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I run a simple vortex red dot and backup iron sights. Perfectly capable for the ranges I need with 223

    • @glock23fan50
      @glock23fan50 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most of these tubers are product pushers. Some give legit options and see how deep are your pockets. As civilians buy best self defense weapon and optic you can afford. Govt. is the only domestic Terrorist you need to prepare for alphabet boys. Head shots 0-300 meters. Red Dots and irons will do. It’s the operator not the weapon!!! Rock on Gents.

  • @bravotacticalinc
    @bravotacticalinc ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the most informative video I have seen I a long time.

  • @dadkins4952
    @dadkins4952 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Wish I could run out and buy a $1700 acog and pair to a $500 rmr but I guess I'm SOL 🤷 what's something similar but more affordable for the person who works 50 hours a week and has bills to pay? Not knocking expensive optics, but not all of us can pull em off because of the price. Especially with trying to fund range time in the first place

    • @orpheusepiphanes2797
      @orpheusepiphanes2797 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Primary arms has a more affordable setup

    • @3ddon602
      @3ddon602 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Save up or use credit and pay it back

  • @BAcHIGU_
    @BAcHIGU_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    New vid from Lucas! That's what's up!

  • @cadian122
    @cadian122 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I prefer the Prismatic or Red Dot and magnifier system over LPVOs for many of the reasons listed.. I would like to point out that Primary Arms and Vortex are doing amazing things with Prism optics that come in under 350 bucks and weigh under 8oz... And given both those companies vast experience in the Prism Optic Market they are valid entry's ... And for magnifiers the Vortex Micro 3x is a cost effective/ low weight/ and low profile magnifier option ...

    • @ABKATSOR22
      @ABKATSOR22 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Picked up an SLX 3X prism this year from PA. Absolutely love it. 3X feels like the perfect magnification level. Love the ACSS reticle they’re using now. Never really thought I would prefer a chevron but having that nice sharp point is great. Shot in heavy snow the other day and really liked having the illumination off which is where the etched reticle of the prisms is great. The black contrast against the white was super crisp. Haven’t tried shooting at longer ranges yet to test the BDC. I’m sure it’s not as tough as an ACOG. Still, I am very pleased with it. Might pick up their SLX cyclops (1x) as well.

    • @cadian122
      @cadian122 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ABKATSOR22 good to hear man.. The PA and Vortex gen 2 are being highly reviewed so im excited for this new wave of affordable and light and high quality prisms

  • @brandonSR92
    @brandonSR92 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ACOG TA110 (3.5x) has better eye relief than the 4x. I run that with a Trijicon RMR on top and run BUIS without issue.
    Awesome video and info, keep it up.

    • @dcskating08
      @dcskating08 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s heavier, clunkier, and worse FOV. Eye relief isn’t an issue if you run it all the way to the rear.

    • @brandonSR92
      @brandonSR92 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dcskating08 Not enough to notice.

  • @marianmoses9604
    @marianmoses9604 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    An interesting discussion from 8 months ago. I have some thoughts with regard to why the truckers protest failed in Canada. They recoiled from “violent action” when the government resorted to tyrannical acts to crush them. “Violent Action.” Those are the key words, aren’t they? If government manages to create for itself a monopoly on the capacity to engage in violent action against its own people, then you have tyranny.
    Americans realized this in 1775. That’s why our ancestors DID engage in “violent action” in order to resist the Crown’s soldiers when they came to disarm the colonial militias. Then, once the Revolution was over, we enshrined that natural right to self-defense against tyrannical government by adding the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. That amendment was added by men who did not quiver and shake and wet their pants over the prospect of having to use armed force to defend their rights against government tyranny.
    It is time for people who aspire to remain free in ALL Western countries to abandon this government / Leftwing propaganda and brainwashing that has conditioned millions of people to reject the use of armed force as a legitimate means of securing essential liberty. ALL governments are not reason - they are FORCE. Only an armed population willing to push back against tyrants with armed violence will remain perpetually free.
    The very second you abandon this stance you are no longer a free man or a free woman - you are a subject - a peon - a peasant - a prole - and the bastards who rule over you can and will do whatever they want to you. The actions taken by the Trudeau government against the peaceful trucker’s protest proved that beyond any shadow of a doubt.
    This tough truth may be difficult for many of our Canadian brothers to swallow, but there it is - the truth. Time to come to terms with it and either man-up and do what must be done, or surrender and beg your new masters to be merciful towards you.
    It should be added that violent action is reserved for when all constitutional means of redress of grievances against the government have been denied or when government subverts or otherwise ignores the constraints of constitutional governance. It is always the LAST recourse. The very last. But a recourse it must remain, or in principle and in reality, you are no longer free.
    Why do you think the Trudeau government moved to grab the people’s guns in the wake of what they did to the people protesting in Ottawa? Because they fear that the next time they have their boot on the throats of the Canadian people they will meet with armed resistance. It’s really that simple. Governments that fear their own people will always move quickly to disarm them. And they only fear their own people because they are ABUSING their own citizens. Think long and hard about that.

  • @True_Patriotx
    @True_Patriotx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That optic (Acog w/ RMR) on an ADM 13.9” core rifle and surefire RC2 mini can and a surefire light and you have the perfect do everything rifle.

  • @luciankristov6436
    @luciankristov6436 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I honestly run slx 3x primary arms micros for optics. I have had good results for ME. Thats what it all comes down to. What will best suit your abilities

  • @hughpewpew
    @hughpewpew 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Admin Results and Garand Thumb started trolling this video 2 days before it came out. High level stuff

  • @peterjames298
    @peterjames298 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Keep up the great work guys !!!

  • @thunderkat5282
    @thunderkat5282 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I agree. Acog/offset is my preferred setup for the 5.56

  • @BuckingFastard
    @BuckingFastard 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Next on TRex arms… why iron sights are the best option ever.

  • @Nathan-zw7nq
    @Nathan-zw7nq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have found that I can shoot really well with a red dot out to 200 yards, past that to 500 yards and I have found that a 3x magnifier works well. I get consistent well placed hits. But I also practice with this setup a lot. I think for most people this works. Most engagements likely wouldn’t happen past 200 yards, unless you’re out west . In that case get a prism or lpvo (I would still prefer an lpvo in that case.)

    • @QuadGodDre
      @QuadGodDre ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly most folks thinking they’re going to get in a long range shoot out while living in the suburbs

  • @ViktoriousDead
    @ViktoriousDead 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    In Ranger batt, we had all the latest and greatest shit, and I’ll still never forget our salty old 1st Sgt who’s killed more people than smallpox running a 16r in rifle with an ACOG. Thought that was something when most of us had MK18 uppers or SCAR H’s with EOTECHs, ainpoint, etc….

  • @Dinkin_Flicka
    @Dinkin_Flicka 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At 10:12, those transitions to the different semi-sprays were so cool.

  • @MinimumSpeedOperator
    @MinimumSpeedOperator 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Been recommending this general combo over all the other crap for like 8 years!!!!!! Mega BASED

  • @NOorah-oj8gt
    @NOorah-oj8gt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nightforce lpvos scopes are built to withstand phenomenal abuse. Although the 4x acog as issued to Marines is incredibly clear and durable!

  • @pauladm123
    @pauladm123 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That last part showing the durability has me sold.

  • @GammaRayTrae
    @GammaRayTrae 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love the 1-6 LPVO still going to stick with it, I just recommend FFP and getting a really good optic. I went with the tango 6t and love it

    • @TREXARMS
      @TREXARMS  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I like that one too.

  • @Nathesium
    @Nathesium ปีที่แล้ว

    One thing I see a lot of ppl doing with top mounted RMRs is they pull their head up and break cheek weld to use it. Something I learned a long time ago from watching a random video about the Leupold HAMR is instead of pulling your head up, tilt the gun and use your other eye to look through the top mounted RMR. So for example, I'm right handed and look through optics with my right eye. When I need to use the top mounted RMR, I tilt the gun as if I'm using a canted RMR and look through the RMR with my left eye. This lets me maintain my cheek weld and helps keep the gun stable.
    Of course, if the RMR up top is mounted at the back of the ACOG, you still won't be able to use it with nightvision. Just wanted to share something I don't see a lot of ppl doing; if there are cons to what I said, feel free to let me know!

  • @curtism-w6b
    @curtism-w6b 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    EOTech, magnifier. I can do everything from near touching distance to 300-400 yards. I'm not shooting much further than that.

    • @IFarmBugs
      @IFarmBugs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      EXPS + G45 comes out even cheaper than the ACOG + RMR plus you're getting slightly more magnification.

    • @cstgraphpads2091
      @cstgraphpads2091 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@IFarmBugs You're also getting a heavier, bulkier pairing.

    • @IFarmBugs
      @IFarmBugs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@cstgraphpads2091 100% true and worse battery life but at the end of the day it looks drip and that's all that really matters lol

    • @abluecardigan
      @abluecardigan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@IFarmBugs EOTech + magnifier gang

    • @modernrambo2
      @modernrambo2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But the eotech doesn’t really have a precise reticle like an ACOG or 1-4/6/8

  • @carlbecklehimer1898
    @carlbecklehimer1898 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think another overlooked optic is the Trijicon TA-44, 1.5X with a 55 gr BDC. It's just enough to get range out to 300-500 yards and is good for around the house. It's eyebox is really forgiving, it's light and it's as durable as any other ACOG. I'm really looking into the 2X (TA-47) as I get older. Anybody have any experience with one?

  • @spldrong
    @spldrong 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I still believe the best optics setup for most people is a red dot with a magnifier. The average inexperienced person does not need to look through a tube while in a gunfight.... they have enough fog of war in 1x

    • @MylesKillis
      @MylesKillis ปีที่แล้ว

      Except when it’s raining or foggy and they have to deal with 4 lenses with water on them instead of two.

    • @spldrong
      @spldrong ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @MylesKillis In theory. In practice, it's worked just fine for me, as long as your gun is the same temperature as outside. Really, only the droplets on your eye side really matter

  • @wellingtonbruh3756
    @wellingtonbruh3756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Question, why not mount a 5-10 or some sort of longer range capable sight and piggyback a red dot. And is there a night vision set up for a long ranger capable scope with a red dot mounted. I use an AR 10 as my main gun so I can hit targets at 600m to 800m. I find that to be a more usable set up for the country side and mountains of my area.

  • @charlesknowles7936
    @charlesknowles7936 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The acog is a perfect general purpose optic. I've been running two for years on two different rifles and through 5 different training classes. This battery powered one would be great to look at.

  • @erggml1887
    @erggml1887 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I prefer the TA11F ACOG. The 3.5X35 has better eye relief than the 4x. I also really like the no battery needed vs battery powered optic. It really is nice to know I will have an illuminated reticle that just works. It means I don't have to remember batteries, switching or settings. There are times where battery powered stuff is better but even in that case I find that my ACOG still works well enough that I am ok with the trade-off.

  • @erfanzamani2083
    @erfanzamani2083 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What do you think about a 3x prism and a canted red dot as the best do it all for an 12.5 AR15
    I normally shoot btw 20-200 yards within my classes

  • @ebitdareadthebook1535
    @ebitdareadthebook1535 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Lucas is one of the most legit LARPers out there. He is committed.

    • @TREXARMS
      @TREXARMS  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Negative. I don't LARP enough doing SUT or field exercises.

  • @GasGunsGod
    @GasGunsGod 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I keep preaching it. Just have the best of both worlds. A 1x illuminated prism optic with a dedicated single power 3,4,5X swivel

  • @mrjimy2c
    @mrjimy2c 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I wish someone would do a video on why red dots don't work for people who wear glasses or contacts if if their glasses or contacts aren't available

  • @machine1758
    @machine1758 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've have both lpvos and acogs, I believe they both have there place, I like both and don't think you can go wrong with eather, but I definitely agree with Lucas for new shooters or just best value the acog is hard to beat!

  • @DominicZelenak
    @DominicZelenak 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    For all us poors out there: the cheapest ACOG will be $1000 (without an RMR) on a good day or $800 if PSA is running a crazy deal. Many great LPVOs plus a mount and prism scopes can be had for half that cost (Primary Arms, Burris, Vortex, Swampfox, etc). Do not think you are priced out of the market from Lucas' cost analysis. He shoots EOTechs, trijicons, aimpoints, etc. Premium companies, premium cost.

    • @jrcumming997r6
      @jrcumming997r6 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The LPVO’s you listed are not “great” by a long shot

    • @Kypreparedness
      @Kypreparedness 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They can be had every day new for under 1k, especially the smaller 1.5x 2x and 3x acogs. The TA01NSN 4x is 870

    • @IFarmBugs
      @IFarmBugs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ayyo wtf is Swampfox, I ain't never heard of no swampfox lvpo 🤣

    • @joel553009
      @joel553009 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Durability is not there for those optics though. Comparesd to acog

    • @donteh58
      @donteh58 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I had a Primary Arms TA31 Aurora with a RM05 piggy back. let it go and built out another rifle with a PA 5X gen3 aurora and Holosun HE509-RD. I had to have the enclosed rds. For me its the right blend of cost to utility. the 5x to me looks better than my PA-1-6x acss Aurora

  • @Melissa.712
    @Melissa.712 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great way to start a video

  • @Schustywithavengance
    @Schustywithavengance ปีที่แล้ว +3

    8 months later and literally half of the guys I train with are running acogs and love them.

  • @slowmo7500
    @slowmo7500 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    PA PLx-Compact 1-8 is 16.9oz (without the mount, of course).

  • @mbody22
    @mbody22 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Carried the ACOG on two pumps and nothing really to complain about and was thinking about the VCOG 1-6 as another option. The Corps adopted it and SOF run it as well, any experience with it in the durability field?

    • @gtlvr82
      @gtlvr82 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      As a former Marine and four deployment veteran...ACOGs are like little baby tanks. If it's issued to the Marine Corps it's probably built to last because their budget is tiny so they can't afford to replace as much as the Army per year.

  • @ashman0071
    @ashman0071 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nuance is what you are explaining - great post ,

  • @hackmedia7755
    @hackmedia7755 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    you could try using a Meprolight reflex on the front. They make the small ones for pistols too. They're night-vision friendly.

  • @JJGuccione
    @JJGuccione ปีที่แล้ว

    A agree with about everything Rex is preaching. Personally, in my opinion, the RDS on top is NOT an imperative if you don’t possess or plan on purchasing a NOD.
    ACOGs are rugged, great glass, and simple to use. If you have no prior training/experience it’s your best choice in my opinion. Compared to other quality optics, you’re actually saving money.

  • @bucdan9242
    @bucdan9242 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The thing with a LVPO, you're either using the 1x or the max magnification at 4x/6x/8x/10x. So every magnification in between becomes pretty much dead weight because of SFP or FFP glass and how it works. Having a dedicated 4x or 5x from the ACOG or the Vortex and a red dot on top makes sense. Call me a arm chair commando, but Escape From Tarkov has got me loving the Sig 4x with the red dot on top when playing. I'm decked out with LVPOs on almost all of my guns, and it looks cooler, but I've had considerations to switch it up.

    • @abluecardigan
      @abluecardigan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      the sidearm i used in mw2 (original) was the same sidearm i shot expert with at my first command, so i guess there's some sort of overlap!

    • @carsonhunt4642
      @carsonhunt4642 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yea they’re overrated.
      Plus an offset red dot further up the gun is more sick anyways, better for closer range too.
      They make compact prism scopes now with like 2.5x let’s say, but then middle reticle can be used for cqb as well. If want an all in one I recommend that route. Still can easily hit 500yrds, but also super close range too

    • @MrWildfire92
      @MrWildfire92 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You in fact do not only use minimum and maximum magnification on any VPO. The increased field of view of partial mag helps in Battlefield, hunting and ELR settings

    • @toddk1377
      @toddk1377 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@carsonhunt4642
      The 2.5x prism I have is a great middle ground. Good eye box and eye relief due to the large lens, but gives just enough for longer range shots at 3-500 yards all while being very usable in cqb distances.

    • @DTreatz
      @DTreatz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is what makes the Elcan so smart.....if only it wasn't 2 grand lmao, but the middle magnification is good for positive ID