Testing the svbony 80mm ED

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ค. 2024
  • Here is the link to buy this scope: bit.ly/49uso4c OR OR this: bit.ly/49uso4c
    Here is me testing this scope in the day then the night time
    • reviewing the SVBONY S...
    • Svbony AZ Mount #svbon...
    • Sv Bony 3 to 8 mm zoom...
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 31

  • @janomacko5764
    @janomacko5764 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    80 mm under heavily light-polluted sky has indeed only a limited use. Great for Moon, but even Jupiter usually requires more aperture to see finer details. My urban/suburban sky transits from bortle 7 in north-east to bortle 5-6 in south-west, and my 80mm achro shows me for example very fine hint of the Rosette nebula when I use O-III filter, but only in the better part of my sky, while in the worse part of the sky there is absolutely no chance even with my 6 inch newtonian.

    • @JoeJaguar
      @JoeJaguar  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      True I used to own maybe two years ago or maybe it was three years ago the sky watcher 80 mm ED pro, which was the gold version of the evostar
      Jupiter was pretty good in it but yes, when I really want to see good views, I pull out my larger scopes, but somebody looking at just quick grabbing Geo views or maybe for the starting person might be good
      Thanks for watching. Cheers.

  • @amp2amp800
    @amp2amp800 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I think its the greatest as a first telescope, or as a grab and go.

    • @JoeJaguar
      @JoeJaguar  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Oh for sure and I bet you some people already use it for travel already. Thanks for watching.

  • @Vic-pz5oh
    @Vic-pz5oh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Looks like a great scope for the money.i noticed no ca at all in your images.hope svbony send you more goodies to test.

  • @stevew321
    @stevew321 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You're right Joe, I still love my Meade 4000 series.

    • @JoeJaguar
      @JoeJaguar  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for the comment. Yes, I agree. I still love mine and are still excellent quality. I did in the past. Compare them to the Nagler and didn’t see any difference.
      But unfortunately, me never made any good eye pieces after this

  • @MASHIAciacata
    @MASHIAciacata 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Would be nice to see a side by side comparison with other scopes :)

    • @JoeJaguar
      @JoeJaguar  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That’s actually already coming the next Scope that’s coming out next week is the sky watcher equinox which is actually a better grade than the sky watcher ED model so I’ll do a couple videos of that one
      One is an overview of what it is
      Then I’ll take that one outside and will observe a little bit with that and then finally the third one I will do these two scopes side-by-side
      However, I am not 100% sure the last one when I compare them side-by-side might be on my members or my patriot video I’m not 100% sure yet
      I do have regular videos for the public and then I have regular videos that I put on the Patreon members only and I have to put some videos on there
      No one would pay to be on on there, so I do have a few good videos like the tak 128 is on there the Takahashi 1021 video is on there as well as well as the Tel Aviv 85 one of the three videos is on there as well
      So stay tuned and I’ll see what I can do

  • @BurningFlame1999
    @BurningFlame1999 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A very interesting small ED refractor, especially because of it’s low price.

    • @JoeJaguar
      @JoeJaguar  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah, I agree for its price and what it comes with if I was looking for an 80 mm ED I would probably buy it but most likely I would probably go for the 102 version. Which I’m hoping they lend me next.

  • @AmatureAstronomer
    @AmatureAstronomer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Though it is no 16" Dobsonian, I love mine. Very good for deep space celestial photography for very little money. For Luna and planetary work, I use my 6" SCT.

    • @JoeJaguar
      @JoeJaguar  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      OK I understand I guess in this hobby, everything can be so personalized and individual, and there could be 100 different ways to observe
      If that’s what you find great then yeah then keep doing that or using that. Cheers.

  • @lornaz1975
    @lornaz1975 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hey Joe! I think that scope might be under mounted lol!!

    • @JoeJaguar
      @JoeJaguar  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      At least this time they can’t say my mount is under mounted lol yes

  • @SACUNSACA
    @SACUNSACA 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It would be great as small travel scope.

  • @Lighteningday
    @Lighteningday 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How do you think it would compare to the Skywatcher 80mm ED FPL53, which you tested a few years ago ?

    • @JoeJaguar
      @JoeJaguar  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I do not have the sky watcher evostar but my fiancé by fluke in a trade for her William optics 110, which I also reviewed a few months back she was traded her William optics for the sky watcher equinox
      The equinox has the same optics as the evostar but with better accessories and better machines so was an actual bit more expensive telescope, so I will try to compare it with this in the future very soon

  • @3dfxvoodoocards6
    @3dfxvoodoocards6 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Interesting video. So it's maximum magnification without losing image quality was around 180-200x ?

    • @JoeJaguar
      @JoeJaguar  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well, I took it up to 233 power and the image was pretty good. It did break down a little bit but again Jupiter so far away that I can’t say for certain that if Jupiter was at its closest point or opposition if it would’ve been still a good image.
      So what I can say is for the price points and all the features I think it’s a good quality for the price for sure

    • @3dfxvoodoocards6
      @3dfxvoodoocards6 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@JoeJaguarI have the 102 mm ED Svbony version, I was wondering if it makes sense to buy a 3mm or 3.2mm eyepiece for 238x or 223x. Right now the highest magnification eyepiece I have is a 4mm one, 178x.

    • @JoeJaguar
      @JoeJaguar  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@3dfxvoodoocards6 I think you’re 102 can go to those powers not a problem, but it’s probably gonna be more on the moon and planets
      The other thing is I don’t know how steady you’re atmospheric seeing is compared to mine in Toronto Canada even though the light pollution is huge I always notice is steady where I am and that’s why I normally can push up to three or 400 depending on what telescope I’m using where other parts of the world people can’t
      Both times when I visited Mexico with my fiancé Angeles I noticed by the ocean where we were it seems to be a lot more windy and I’m not talking about a little bit a lot
      On our first trip actually knocked my telescope and Tripod right down so in that case, I wasn’t even able to do anything that night
      I say, give it a try
      Also, I’m hoping they lend me the 102 next and you might like it since you have it

    • @3dfxvoodoocards6
      @3dfxvoodoocards6 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@JoeJaguarwith the 4mm eyepiece 178x it looks excellent on the Moon and Jupiter but of course only when the atmospheric conditions allow it :)

    • @amarbirk8987
      @amarbirk8987 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It similar like a lot of the 80ed,almost identical ota, same specs but svnony being better priced.I have purchased a number of svbony products and have been very pleased with their quality

  • @incognito591
    @incognito591 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    you must be SO excited about the eclipse on Monday!!!

    • @JoeJaguar
      @JoeJaguar  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s actually been big news for about two years well really maybe we’ve been waiting for two years the talking is started but something that hasn’t happened in Toronto since 1993 and the next one will be like 2045

  • @supermario8416
    @supermario8416 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Like. Yes Jupiter is no where near as bright as it was in late 2023. It’s maybe half as bright as it was in November 2023.

    • @JoeJaguar
      @JoeJaguar  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah it’s not too bad in the eyepiece quality but the cell phone just can’t capture as good but I’m expecting it would do pretty good if it was near opposition. Cheers.

  • @Coltrane10000
    @Coltrane10000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have the 80mm Skywatcher ED and while the optics are very good it is way too small for astronomy. Especially für Planets i recommend at least 6 inches.

    • @JoeJaguar
      @JoeJaguar  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for your comment and watching the video. I agree with you for the starting off people maybe the 80 would be OK to start but eventually they want to go a little bit bigger like you say 6 inches