Older guy here. I prefer this format over the 4-tabling format because I have difficulties to follow the speed of 4 fast fold tables. When I'm playing I can do only 3 normal tables simultaneously. More than this and my brain capacity is overloaded.
20:01 "Clear fold"? Since we unblock missed flush draws, and we had top pair until the river, isn't it a clear CALL? Yes, villian can have JT but seems to me like his value range (Ax who decided to call both flop and turn so probably aces up + JT + sets) is smaller compared to his bluff range (missed flush draws) and so he will have more than 1 bluff for every 2 value combo (hero needs just to be good below 33% as bet was below pot). Seems like an overbluffed node as well. I'm confused.
I disagree. We have a reg cold calling and filtering on flop then a run out that is really hard to miss. Very few natural bluffs here so I don’t think blockers come into it. Blockers swing things by 1-4% on average and I think this is more underbluffed than that due to an abundance of value hands and not much air remaining by river.
Love the format, Pete. Halfway through Grade 1 of CPS and it definitely is helping me to understand how poker works and feel more confident about how to play in certain spots.
Hi Pete. I had a couple hands I wanted to run by you if you have time. These were literally back to back against the same player within 1 orbit. Just looking for your thoughts on how I played them and what I could have done better. Hand 1-TT on the btn. CO raises to 3bb, hero raises to 7bb, BB and CO call. Flop is Td 4h 8d, BB bets 10bb CO folds, hero raises to 35bb and I get called. Turn is the 6h, and BB moves all in for 32bb and I snap call. River is Jh and BB shows the king high flush and wins 148bb. Hand 2- KK in the CO. folds to hero who opens to 2.4bb, btn folds, Sb and BB calls. We see a flop of 2h 7d 3s. SB leads out 7bb, hero raises to 45bb SB calls. Turn comes the 6h SB checks and hero fires 60bb, SB calls the river comes the 9h and SB leads out 41bb all in, I snap call and SB shows Ah3h for another backdoor flush and takes down 284bb. The first hand I don't think I played wrong, just wrong side of variance. The second hand, I thought about jamming the turn, but went for the 3/4th sizing as the pot was already huge. I went for the huge flop reraise as i thought he was weak and i was making him think it was a tilt reraise. ( worked perfect till the river lol)Can you give me some tips to improve my game?
Love this format much more than the smaller table play/explain. Nice to look at, even if we miss a little action. Regarding your 1BB bet on Acxcxc flop, it was explained to me that we have giant nut advantage on mono tone boards UNLESS they contain an A or K, then the nut advantage swaps to villain, but we still have massive range advantage. To hear you mention "polarization" sort of threw me off. Or by "polarization" do you simply mean "dont polarize here" aka 'bet small?'
When pete suggests the overbet on the turned 4 for a set im like yeah of course because we want villain to think we're bluffing and then pete goes on to talk about how often he can have a value bet and im like oh yeah i forgot i have terrible reasons for the things i do in poker.
When Pete jams the flush (Kh3h) and gets called by the straight, are there hands that would be better bluff catchers than the straight, is that part of why its a bad call? Or is it a bad call simply because it is an underbluffed spot?
Ok the hand where you called down with 77 on the 822 K board, wouldn't it not be overbluffed by UTG because they have a much tighter range compared to button
I don't know for certain - but I think what he's saying is that UTG is relying more heavily on a range advantage than they should - even if their range connects with the board better, most people in the player pool will generally be incentivized to bluff with Any 2 because "erm doesn't this guy know I'm UTG? I'm uncapped and have you CRUSHED in theory buddy..." I guess they'll only ever barrel on a genuine made hand or complete air and they don't balance that polarization properly (i.e. they'll take 90% of their garbage and bluff instead of the necessary 50% to be a balanced player)
This one is a bit marginal but it’s a more overbluffed texture than most in MDA. You’re correct that the position makes it less bluffed. As always there is a push-pull affect from multiple factors.
at 20.30 im prolly overbluffing tbh....psycho.... i also balance my turn check alot with big hands i feel i get attacked alot, i do open a little too wide sb
As always, the content is great, but wanted to comment that I love the format. Easy to follow and learn from. And let me know if you ever want to play on bbo!
Short stack psychosis is what i call it. Short stackers are like releasing a rabid baboon in your house during thanksgiving dinner. Very annoying to play against, sometimes.
This might not be what you want to hear but I think that you have the wrong view here. In fact quite the opposite to a healthy relationship with variance/showdowns/learning poker. Showdowns only show you what the opponent had on one occasion - one piece of their range. Due to the amount of uncertain and unknown information in poker we should be playing vs what we think the opponent’s entire range of hands is on average and this isn’t verifiable from a showdown. We can’t tell from a showdown how well we played.
Sure and in some other video where I fold lots it will look like I’m a nit. In some other video where I aggressively blast off it will look like I’m a maniac. In some other video where I give up river a few times it will look like I’m passive. I urge you to watch more and try to be objective about every spot. Once you’ve done that how about you come back and call me a station again and I’ll challenge you to heads up for bankrolls. And I will call down all of your bluffs. ALL of THEM.
This format is exactly what I've wanted for a while, more please!
Love this format. All your play and explains are in my favourites. Keep up the great content 👋
Love the content. I like this format better than the 4 table, I find it easier to follow.
Older guy here. I prefer this format over the 4-tabling format because I have difficulties to follow the speed of 4 fast fold tables. When I'm playing I can do only 3 normal tables simultaneously. More than this and my brain capacity is overloaded.
20:01 "Clear fold"? Since we unblock missed flush draws, and we had top pair until the river, isn't it a clear CALL? Yes, villian can have JT but seems to me like his value range (Ax who decided to call both flop and turn so probably aces up + JT + sets) is smaller compared to his bluff range (missed flush draws) and so he will have more than 1 bluff for every 2 value combo (hero needs just to be good below 33% as bet was below pot). Seems like an overbluffed node as well. I'm confused.
I disagree. We have a reg cold calling and filtering on flop then a run out that is really hard to miss. Very few natural bluffs here so I don’t think blockers come into it. Blockers swing things by 1-4% on average and I think this is more underbluffed than that due to an abundance of value hands and not much air remaining by river.
Love the format, Pete. Halfway through Grade 1 of CPS and it definitely is helping me to understand how poker works and feel more confident about how to play in certain spots.
Hi Pete. I had a couple hands I wanted to run by you if you have time. These were literally back to back against the same player within 1 orbit. Just looking for your thoughts on how I played them and what I could have done better.
Hand 1-TT on the btn. CO raises to 3bb, hero raises to 7bb, BB and CO call. Flop is Td 4h 8d, BB bets 10bb CO folds, hero raises to 35bb and I get called. Turn is the 6h, and BB moves all in for 32bb and I snap call. River is Jh and BB shows the king high flush and wins 148bb.
Hand 2- KK in the CO. folds to hero who opens to 2.4bb, btn folds, Sb and BB calls. We see a flop of 2h 7d 3s. SB leads out 7bb, hero raises to 45bb SB calls. Turn comes the 6h SB checks and hero fires 60bb, SB calls the river comes the 9h and SB leads out 41bb all in, I snap call and SB shows Ah3h for another backdoor flush and takes down 284bb.
The first hand I don't think I played wrong, just wrong side of variance. The second hand, I thought about jamming the turn, but went for the 3/4th sizing as the pot was already huge. I went for the huge flop reraise as i thought he was weak and i was making him think it was a tilt reraise. ( worked perfect till the river lol)Can you give me some tips to improve my game?
Best live playing format so far thanks pete
Love this format. Real time thought process against the clock. More please!
Love the transparency. Thank You Pete.
Enjoy this format, Pete!
Love this format!
Love this format much more than the smaller table play/explain. Nice to look at, even if we miss a little action.
Regarding your 1BB bet on Acxcxc flop, it was explained to me that we have giant nut advantage on mono tone boards UNLESS they contain an A or K, then the nut advantage swaps to villain, but we still have massive range advantage. To hear you mention "polarization" sort of threw me off. Or by "polarization" do you simply mean "dont polarize here" aka 'bet small?'
Very good format, subbed.
20:55 i felt that
Really good commentary, really interesting spots, cool to see your thought process
Great format, thanks a lot for sharing!
please continue this format! awesome content
hey Pete, are you planning to post the graph of your challenge when you finish on youtube?
This is a good format. Thanks!
Great content. Love this format, prefer this to 4 tables.
Why not value bet on river w AKs on A-high monotone flop, paired-board on river?
When pete suggests the overbet on the turned 4 for a set im like yeah of course because we want villain to think we're bluffing and then pete goes on to talk about how often he can have a value bet and im like oh yeah i forgot i have terrible reasons for the things i do in poker.
Love this format Pete, thanks 🍀
This format is best. 🤠
Great play and explain.
Only showing one table is 100% the way to go.
Especially for those of us mostly watching on a phone
When Pete jams the flush (Kh3h) and gets called by the straight, are there hands that would be better bluff catchers than the straight, is that part of why its a bad call? Or is it a bad call simply because it is an underbluffed spot?
It’s bad because it’s highly losing vs the average range that makes this jam. Try not to overcomplicate!
@@CarrotCornerPoker good advice thanks
Ok the hand where you called down with 77 on the 822 K board, wouldn't it not be overbluffed by UTG because they have a much tighter range compared to button
I don't know for certain - but I think what he's saying is that UTG is relying more heavily on a range advantage than they should - even if their range connects with the board better, most people in the player pool will generally be incentivized to bluff with Any 2 because "erm doesn't this guy know I'm UTG? I'm uncapped and have you CRUSHED in theory buddy..." I guess they'll only ever barrel on a genuine made hand or complete air and they don't balance that polarization properly (i.e. they'll take 90% of their garbage and bluff instead of the necessary 50% to be a balanced player)
This one is a bit marginal but it’s a more overbluffed texture than most in MDA. You’re correct that the position makes it less bluffed. As always there is a push-pull affect from multiple factors.
Love this. It's very informational. Keep up the guten verk
at 20.30 im prolly overbluffing tbh....psycho.... i also balance my turn check alot with big hands i feel i get attacked alot, i do open a little too wide sb
I love how Pete so specifically targets. Even though he knows it isn’t a thing
Only the experienced can safely handle ‘targeting’ it’s too dangerous for amateurs.
@@CarrotCornerPoker but Pete, that isn’t a thing!!
Good format, two tables would be the most for me
If he showed 32o in that flush fold it would be hillarious.
I greatly prefer the way you manage the tables in this video
Hi Pete amazing format, not a fan of 4 tables :) thank you
I really like this content!
As always, the content is great, but wanted to comment that I love the format. Easy to follow and learn from. And let me know if you ever want to play on bbo!
Thanks! Why do I recognise your name?
Short stack psychosis is what i call it.
Short stackers are like releasing a rabid baboon in your house during thanksgiving dinner.
Very annoying to play against, sometimes.
1 Table on screen is great
Excellent - do more, now, again.
MORE! GIVE IT TO US!!
A10o folded on the button to a HJ open???
Normal in theory but it wouldn’t be the worst exploit 3bet with skill edge.
Love it my beloved baboon😂❤
Is this 100 RnC? Great content
Yes
He looks very much like the guy from V for Vendetta in this video. 😅
a lot of questionable preflop folds, playing 100b deep
6-max as well when people are 3-betting wide
No
yes, maybe not a lot but a handful
More vids like this
Most interested in hands with showdown, anything else is speculative sand we can't really learn anything concrete
This might not be what you want to hear but I think that you have the wrong view here. In fact quite the opposite to a healthy relationship with variance/showdowns/learning poker. Showdowns only show you what the opponent had on one occasion - one piece of their range. Due to the amount of uncertain and unknown information in poker we should be playing vs what we think the opponent’s entire range of hands is on average and this isn’t verifiable from a showdown. We can’t tell from a showdown how well we played.
@@CarrotCornerPoker we can't tell from a showdown how well we played?
love it
looks like ure a station
Sure and in some other video where I fold lots it will look like I’m a nit. In some other video where I aggressively blast off it will look like I’m a maniac. In some other video where I give up river a few times it will look like I’m passive. I urge you to watch more and try to be objective about every spot. Once you’ve done that how about you come back and call me a station again and I’ll challenge you to heads up for bankrolls. And I will call down all of your bluffs. ALL of THEM.
Sexy content Pete. Thank you.
I do try to be sexy
More like this please