If a manufacturer does zero or little drive and impact testing after assembly, expect the impact force to rise on a new or freshly serviced tool. This is due to excess grease on the surfaces. I acts like a fluid damperer (overly simplified). As you initially use the tool and the internal mechanics fling away excess grease from the surfaces, the force exerted will increase. It shouldn't take a lot of work for that to happen though, unless it has been overpacked.
I have the 2853? 1/2" I feel mine is weak. Only used it twice but pulled it out and threw on a fresh battery and it struggled to take off some car lug nuts I just put on the day before and torqued to 125lb. I think mine is 600lb in reverse. It struggled.
your review are so professional. great job as usual. you don't always review told that appeal to me, but I am subscribed and enjoy every review that catches my eye
My old 2763 has performed great since day one. I haven't touched my air impact since the day that I bought the 2763. Very pleased with its performance.
Great video, good to know my money invested in my Milwaukee 2763 has many more years of reliable power loss free use ahead of me! I too originally bought the 2763 for a Timing belt job based on your video. Since then I've added a few more Milwaukee impacts to my collection. Appreciate the videos!
Why does it look like new unit is larger when you have them on the table at the end of the video? Probably just the camera angle but you can see height difference from the pegboard holes in the background.
that's actually a good idea,,, test the earthquake vs best of husky vs best kobalt vs best of craftsman, , 1/2in air impact. .im sure there's alot of people curious about that,, since thats what most people who aren't every day mechanics would buy,,
Kobalt just up the stake against their competitor Milwaukee Fuel lines by releasing their very own new 24V brushless impact wrench that delivers 650lbs ft out the box. I decided to check both the cordless impact wrenches out (Lowes is literally across the street) and I must say, I'm quite impressed. The entry price point was absolutely jaw dropping, and it's not even on any special sale. They've been watching HD Milwaukee and now just as them, offer Lithium Ion batterytechnology that are easily swappable with other lines of proprietary brushless tools. Power, price and feature of battery swappability was a huge factor in deciding which one to go with and that's easily what had drawn me to milwaukee series of tools. Now, it's tough. With this new competition, now it boils down to power and price. Kobalt's 650lbs/ft vs Milwaukees 1,000lbs/ft with two variable speed fastening settings is no comparison but for the folks who aren't using these tools in their trade speciality or professional jobsite, Kobalt's ridiculously low price is ahead on this one. Right? They even replicated the Home Depot' 5:3 ratio: 5yr tool & 3yr battery warranty. Seriously, the friggin power tools body and shape looks exactly like a Milwaukee 2763 that I was just holding in my hand across the street. Even the battery charger looks the same. So where is the catch? There gotta be something. I dunno if it was me but the Kobalt felt beefier and had a all rubber nose surrounding the 1/2" drive. I went over and asked Lowes sales rep about the specs and he pulled the same ones out from the internet that I've already researched night before. Here is the weird thing: nut busting is 650 alright but no where does Kobalt mention specify it's fastening capability unlike the M18 fuel series that has all the bragging rights. I been watching several of these online tool review for some time and read most comments and it's clear this is very important feature not to overlooked, ESPECIALLY, if Kobalt doesn't offer a two fastening setting. After some time the rep gave up looking because he couldn't find the answer anywhere from Kobalts sources and decided I contact corp and he connected me directly with Kobalt. After 37minutes engaging in futility with different Kobalt reps on the phone playing the run around phone tag I ended up with same result: none of them knew the fastening capability of the impact wrench either, aside from speculating that it 'must be' 650lbs/ft going in each direction. Nope. I'm not buying it. I already learned what other commentators went through. I ask them where are the written sources by Kobalt that could see for me myself and it's just not there. Not even on the box.
I love the idea of cordless tools, but as a hobbyist, I've rarely found cordless tools ready to go when I am. I have a simple 1/4 set from Milwaukee for both impact and drilling, and those are fine for everyday projects. But I've regretted my 1/2 purchase, and ultimately sold it off for better air tools. However, 10 years later the battery technology looks a lot better. I might give this high torque impact a shot thanks to the power shown in this review and others about the batteries.
The 12 volt lithium ion Fuel kits have better performance than the 18 volt NiCad kits from 5 years ago. Cordless tools have come such a long way. I am a carpenter by trade, and the new 7 1/4 Fuel skill saw has completely replaced my old corded circular saws. I can frame all day, and even on 3 amp hour batteries the tool always lasts longer than it takes my other battery to charge. Pretty much my whole kit, all saws and tools, is milwaukee now.
Hey man i just baught this gun to use for heavy duty, how long does the battery last you? Its gunna be used for semi truck lug nuts etc. How long does 1 battery last you per charge?
Great video. I just picked up the 2763 for $250 at Home depot! (Special offer). Always wanted one after having used a friend's. The thing can't be beat!
glad u did this test, original test,help'ed me choose to stick with the Milwaukee line, rather than invest in Ingersollrand.,,, been very pleased, but this help's any concern's,it can get weak in time,also purchased the Sunex 3342 3/8" master set. for my 2754 3/8" Milwaukee impact. and m-12 3/8" rachet. thx again !
I have lots of cordless tools and everyone of the batteries degrade over time not in power so much its the time the power is applied that I notice is reduced . If you could test the batteries on their own I think you would see the reduction in capacity . How to test, ask Milwaukee . Never seen it done on TH-cam yet. Cheers
I rotate batteries, so they don't get used nearly as much as a single tool would......I agree, that would be a good test, but I don't see a realistic way to do it.
Any chance of a future video of the milwaukee m18 fuel brushless 2860 or 2861 1/2 inch mid torque impact wrench actual torque readings on each power setting using forward and reverse?
I've got a few Milwaukee tools, not a fan boy by any means, but this is just impressive and urges me to purchase one of these...great idea for a video, thanks for your thoroughness. Keep it up!
can i use mode 2 with a torqur stick? can i use mode 2 for lug nut removal? i just got this tool for my track car. installing arp studs and dont want to ruin anything. also tired of doing countless tire swaps by hand.
I wouldn't suggest it. The power levels in mode 2 will either ruin the torque stick or your lugs/studs/rim. Torque sticks are made of spring steel & aren't effective over certain amounts of input torque. The 3-speed Dewalt would be a lot better choice (check out the vs vid I made about the dcf899, 2763, & w7150).
I have this Milwaukee model and it's a bit strange. If I slowly press on the trigger it will either stall or turn slowly. I have to get on the trigger so it turns the way it should. Anyone else having this problem?
Thank you for this video! Can you do a comparison on the New 2763 High Torque and the New 2861 Mid Torque? Which do you recommend for removing those pesky axle nuts? Is the 2861 fully capable for this?
I have not used a 2861 yet, so I couldn't say either way. A lot of others seem to like them, but no real torque #s (other than marketing hype) is out yet. If I buy one, I will be adding it to the testing to find out.
Will you do a review on the Earthquake 1/2 air impact from Harbor Freight? Mine seems very strong compared to my Kobalt and I am curious how close it comes to the torque numbers claimed.
Quick Question: I just recently got a Milwaukee 7263 (my first of the M18 lineup... but I've owned the M12s for a while), have you had to do any maintenance on your 7263? I've heard of the need to lubricate the anvil every so often.
You have to take the entire tool apart in order to do that.....which will void your warranty. I would suggest watching my video with this impact VS the Snap-on.....in that I show how to do take it apart.
Never.....that being said, I don't use it nearly as much as someone who does on a daily basis ---- I would like to see what the inside looks like after 1-2 years of hard use....I bet it would be a lot more worn/dry.
i've been researching both the 7263 and the DCF899, and am as of yet undecided. i did see your video comparing those two plus the IR brushless. seeing this kind of gives me an idea which you believe is more durable and better constructed for professional use---am i correct? also, the milwaukee has a much longer warranty period. however, i have been seeing the 7263 offered by different retailers for the same price, but some with 5.0 batts and some with 4.0 batts. would that mean the 4.0s would be the 'old' 2763 and the 5.0s the ;new'?? thanks!!
I like the 3 speed/power modes on the Dewalt.....mode 1 on the Milwaukee is fairly useless. The Milwaukee does have the option for a protective boot which is nice, but I would also suggest looking at the Makita XWT08.....it beats them all & has some very good options with it. If you go with the Milwaukee, yes get the 5.0ah versions.....the 4.0ah are "old stock" & those batteries have been sitting AT LEAST a year.
I was in the same boat as you. I ordered the Milwaukee last night. I'm sure we'd be equally as happy with either. I got it for $359 shipped. I found one on ebay and had Summit Racing price match it. Already shipped and on the way.
ive got the milwaukee and my buddy has the dewalt despite the dewalt being rated higher at 1200ftlbs there has been 3 times where my milwaukee impact would revove the bolt that his wouldn't one was the crank pulley on a toyota 4 runner another was a cross threaded bolt on a 1/2in capacity hydraulic shear and the last was a pully bolt on a 100hp electric motor.
I believe a lot of factors com into place. First of all I'll say that those numbers themselves are no more different than can be explained by manufacturing tolerances alone. 2nd as another one writes wear in is also a factor. That can be good and bad. Because surfaces gets polished and so slips and hits faster. On the other hand the grease they had when they were new has mostly gone. If you want to relube your impact gun at some point do a test before and after. Wouldn't surprise me if it'll actually loose a little power for a start which it'll regain when grease has been redistributed. However for longevity it's always better with fresh clean grease instead of old full of metal particles. Ideally you should have bought two back then and if possible from the same batch. They might "not" have changed anything or so they'll tell you. But many manufacturers do change things internally. Usually they make cost and manufacturing "optimizations" as time goes by even for the same "unchanged" model. Often it's not in the advantage of the buyer unless it's an unlucky model having some design flaws to begin with. And then there's also wear on the manufacturing tools not even to mention it might be the same model but nothing that was used to make your old one has been used to make your new one.
The new 2763 posted just about the same numbers as the old one did in the original, 2-year-old, tests. Looks like the old one actually gained power with age...
if i was able to send you a new snap-on 18v cordless impact could you test it against the other cordless impacts? i would need the tool back but i would love to see what you come up with
Awesome! Great video,I think I'm going to pick one up now.hey do you think you can do this with the 3/8 version vs snap ons ct8810?please,that snap on is a total piece of garbage and very expensive.i really want to see if the milwaukee is better.
I'm very upset with my Milwaukee 1400' foot pound I haven't even used 20 times and it was light duty uses I came across a bolt it couldn't remove and I used my Craftsman 560' foot pound Air gun and it took right off fast impacts out of the Milwaukee but craftsman slower impacts but stronger Milwaukee is still very powerful but way over Rate it im very upset and this is a perfect example cause the gun is practically new im extremely disappointed.
I liked the video but I'm not sure if it probes anything. The fact that both perform the same doesn't prove that the old one didn't loose power over time. A fair test would be having the numbers of the old one two years ago and the numbers now of the same old one and that would give you a true test. This test only proves that an old tool performs as the new tool but doesn't prove that the old one didn't have any deterioration. Anyway I like your videos. Thanks!
Do a review on the Carlyle Long Beam Combination metric wrenches from napa part number CHT CWL1219M. They have a similar open end design like Snap-On's Flank drive.
I wonder if the older version did better because of the break in time!! You should use the new one that you have for two years and do this test again and see if it works better than day one. The review that you did two years ago with the now two year old model had very similar test numbers that this new one has. New two years ago was reverse 1,014 and new in this video reverse is 1,019. Thank You for a Great video
valid point, clearly remember, and against Dewalt, it hit 1012,and Dewalt 1014,....... and my Dewalt dw059 1/2" impact, is a joke, was almost a waste of money. ,,,good for changing drive belt's on scooter's, using like a 3/8" cordless. but for anything heavy, even tire's some idiot used an air tool and did not torque,correctly, it can not remove.
Great video👍 thanks for taking the time to put this issue to rest. I can't believe it was an issue anyway, the motor has no brushes to wear and create torque loss. I never believed brushless motors lost power but I am glad you proved it once and for all to shut up the nay sayers.
BrenticusMaximus1 brushless motors are great, they've held up great in the hobby world where they're pushed harder and they don't degrade. I can remember rebuilding and cleaning my brushed motors and being amazed at the regained power.
I'm curious too. I have a couple new 9.0amp batteries and the impact wrench above. I haven't had a chance to see if it has more power. I love this wrench. I haven't found a bolt it can't remove. I guess when i do find that bolt/nut I will have to test the 5.0amp battery and the 9.0amp battery. The 9.0amp battery's came with the new Milwaukee brushless miter saw seems quality too.
Now you just need to do a longterm Ridgid brad nailer review to throw some shade at AvE's "this AirStrike stuff won't last that long" :) I'm fond of Chris' channel, but his "seat of the pants" diss on everything is in stark contrast to your approach in introducing rigour and repeatability to tool testing. It's appreciated.
As much as I find AvE's stuff funny and entertaining, this only reinforces what I"ve know about the 2763. It's got a ton of power and is reliable, the shop I work for has had one for at least 2 years and it's been beaten to a pulp yet stuff knocks nuts and bolts with ease with it's original XC 4.0 batteries. I just bought one myself with XC 5.0 batteries based on it plus a few other M18 Fuel tools for shop use. Power and reliability count and Milwaukee seems to got it nailed with the Fuel line.
New impact: "Hey old timer! Ready to get shown up by the new guy in town?" Old impact (to IR electric impact): "Ready to see the new guy cry? Hold my beer and watch this sh..."
The old Milwaukinese kicked ass for between 3 days -3 months but did a great job before it died, oh wait, that's the new stuff too. Great for home owners though, MILWAUKINESE 4 LIFE!!!
Where did I buy the M18 FUEL 2763-22 can't find 2763 @ Home depot I found only the 2662 ,, I found it on E bay after seeing this video I WANT YOUR 2 YEAR OLD MODEL LOL THANKS
Hammer always hits harder after grease has been used for a long time for example when you service your impact and put fresh grease in it.It will not hit as hard for awhile
Bro your tool review is among the best on the Internet.
Awesome test!!!
So the boot is like a racing stripe.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@RealToolReviews You're alive. Damn. I thought your compressor fell on you and you didn't have a Life Alert necklace.
Hahahahahaha
i’ll keep the old one stronger with the 12 battery 💪🏽
Thank you Casey Affleck. Great video.
At the end the day Milwaukee delivers two great products . Cheers
If a manufacturer does zero or little drive and impact testing after assembly, expect the impact force to rise on a new or freshly serviced tool. This is due to excess grease on the surfaces. I acts like a fluid damperer (overly simplified). As you initially use the tool and the internal mechanics fling away excess grease from the surfaces, the force exerted will increase. It shouldn't take a lot of work for that to happen though, unless it has been overpacked.
I'm getting puppies for Christmas. Should I name them Skidmore and Wilhelm?
1,000% yes.
@@RealToolReviews haha :)
Still enjoying my 2 years old 2763 but most I really do enjoy your clear and comprehensive reviews. Please keep it up
Nice video. Your first video convinced me to purchase the 2763-22 and I have been very happy with it. Keep the videos coming. Thanks
Another nice job
I have the 2853? 1/2" I feel mine is weak. Only used it twice but pulled it out and threw on a fresh battery and it struggled to take off some car lug nuts I just put on the day before and torqued to 125lb. I think mine is 600lb in reverse. It struggled.
Love your videos. Always detailed and informative.
Thanks a lot!
your review are so professional. great job as usual. you don't always review told that appeal to me, but I am subscribed and enjoy every review that catches my eye
Please compare the newer 2767 to older 2763. Ive research that new version is much weaker than older version.
I would expect wear and tear to take a toll. I'd expect 2 year old batteries to suffer a bit as well compared to new.
Impressive longevity...
Nice demo.. How you can tell the older 2763 from the new 2763? Is it the index number that follows the 63..?
I don't think there actually is a new 2763 in terms of versions. This one is just fresh.
Still love my Milwaukee 2662 impact. No where near the same power but still gets the job done great. I see this one in my future for sure.
My old 2763 has performed great since day one. I haven't touched my air impact since the day that I bought the 2763. Very pleased with its performance.
Great video, good to know my money invested in my Milwaukee 2763 has many more years of reliable power loss free use ahead of me!
I too originally bought the 2763 for a Timing belt job based on your video. Since then I've added a few more Milwaukee impacts to my collection.
Appreciate the videos!
Why does it look like new unit is larger when you have them on the table at the end of the video? Probably just the camera angle but you can see height difference from the pegboard holes in the background.
Camera angle...they are 100% identical units.
that's actually a good idea,,, test the earthquake vs best of husky vs best kobalt vs best of craftsman, , 1/2in air impact. .im sure there's alot of people curious about that,, since thats what most people who aren't every day mechanics would buy,,
Kobalt just up the stake against their competitor Milwaukee Fuel lines by releasing their very own new 24V brushless impact wrench that delivers 650lbs ft out the box.
I decided to check both the cordless impact wrenches out (Lowes is literally across the street) and I must say, I'm quite impressed.
The entry price point was absolutely jaw dropping, and it's not even on any special sale. They've been watching HD Milwaukee and now just as them, offer Lithium Ion batterytechnology that are easily swappable with other lines of proprietary brushless tools.
Power, price and feature of battery swappability was a huge factor in deciding which one to go with and that's easily what had drawn me to milwaukee series of tools.
Now, it's tough.
With this new competition, now it boils down to power and price. Kobalt's 650lbs/ft vs Milwaukees 1,000lbs/ft with two variable speed fastening settings is no comparison but for the folks who aren't using these tools in their trade speciality or professional jobsite, Kobalt's ridiculously low price is ahead on this one. Right?
They even replicated the Home Depot' 5:3 ratio: 5yr tool & 3yr battery warranty. Seriously, the friggin power tools body and shape looks exactly like a Milwaukee 2763 that I was just holding in my hand across the street. Even the battery charger looks the same.
So where is the catch? There gotta be something. I dunno if it was me but the Kobalt felt beefier and had a all rubber nose surrounding the 1/2" drive. I went over and asked Lowes sales rep about the specs and he pulled the same ones out from the internet that I've already researched night before.
Here is the weird thing: nut busting is 650 alright but no where does Kobalt mention specify it's fastening capability unlike the M18 fuel series that has all the bragging rights.
I been watching several of these online tool review for some time and read most comments and it's clear this is very important feature not to overlooked, ESPECIALLY, if Kobalt doesn't offer a two fastening setting. After some time the rep gave up looking because he couldn't find the answer anywhere from Kobalts sources and decided I contact corp and he connected me directly with Kobalt. After 37minutes engaging in futility with different Kobalt reps on the phone playing the run around phone tag I ended up with same result: none of them knew the fastening capability of the impact wrench either, aside from speculating that it 'must be' 650lbs/ft going in each direction.
Nope. I'm not buying it. I already learned what other commentators went through. I ask them where are the written sources by Kobalt that could see for me myself and it's just not there. Not even on the box.
Love your reviews sir... helped me when it came to buying a tool. Thanks a lot
Engineer’s belt isn’t symmetrical
This review was a great idea. Well done.
I love the idea of cordless tools, but as a hobbyist, I've rarely found cordless tools ready to go when I am. I have a simple 1/4 set from Milwaukee for both impact and drilling, and those are fine for everyday projects. But I've regretted my 1/2 purchase, and ultimately sold it off for better air tools.
However, 10 years later the battery technology looks a lot better. I might give this high torque impact a shot thanks to the power shown in this review and others about the batteries.
The 12 volt lithium ion Fuel kits have better performance than the 18 volt NiCad kits from 5 years ago. Cordless tools have come such a long way. I am a carpenter by trade, and the new 7 1/4 Fuel skill saw has completely replaced my old corded circular saws. I can frame all day, and even on 3 amp hour batteries the tool always lasts longer than it takes my other battery to charge. Pretty much my whole kit, all saws and tools, is milwaukee now.
I am so glad I bought the 2763 last week! It is a beast
Hey man i just baught this gun to use for heavy duty, how long does the battery last you? Its gunna be used for semi truck lug nuts etc. How long does 1 battery last you per charge?
You must have a surplus of 2" Sunex impact sockets.
Sunex sponsors the sockets in our torque testing videos ---- allowing 100% accurate results each time.
Great video. I just picked up the 2763 for $250 at Home depot! (Special offer). Always wanted one after having used a friend's. The thing can't be beat!
glad u did this test, original test,help'ed me choose to stick with the Milwaukee line, rather than invest in Ingersollrand.,,, been very pleased, but this help's any concern's,it can get weak in time,also purchased the Sunex 3342 3/8" master set. for my 2754 3/8" Milwaukee impact. and m-12 3/8" rachet. thx again !
I have lots of cordless tools and everyone of the batteries degrade over time not in power so much its the time the power is applied that I notice is reduced . If you could test the batteries on their own I think you would see the reduction in capacity . How to test, ask Milwaukee . Never seen it done on TH-cam yet. Cheers
Congrats on 30K , well done buddy..
Thanks Steve!
I rotate batteries, so they don't get used nearly as much as a single tool would......I agree, that would be a good test, but I don't see a realistic way to do it.
Power mode 1 is not 120nm! More like 30, just!
Any plans to do the 2754?
I’m not sure you can even say yours was “moderately used”
do the 2767 version
Any chance of a future video of the milwaukee m18 fuel brushless 2860 or 2861 1/2 inch mid torque impact wrench actual torque readings on each power setting using forward and reverse?
I've got a few Milwaukee tools, not a fan boy by any means, but this is just impressive and urges me to purchase one of these...great idea for a video, thanks for your thoroughness. Keep it up!
were the batteries on the old one the 2 year old batteries or were they the same vintage as the ones in the new impact wrench
can i use mode 2 with a torqur stick? can i use mode 2 for lug nut removal? i just got this tool for my track car. installing arp studs and dont want to ruin anything. also tired of doing countless tire swaps by hand.
I wouldn't suggest it. The power levels in mode 2 will either ruin the torque stick or your lugs/studs/rim. Torque sticks are made of spring steel & aren't effective over certain amounts of input torque. The 3-speed Dewalt would be a lot better choice (check out the vs vid I made about the dcf899, 2763, & w7150).
I ordered one of these last night. Need a boot. Does it fit in the case with the boot installed?
Nope.....but you can take a heatgun, heat up the case & put the impact in there with a boot on in order to stretch it to fit.
Real Tool Reviews That's exactly what I did. It now fits like a glove.
Hi can you make a video on the dewalt mid driver DCF8943. The torque spec dont seem add up to what the factory is saying, Thank you.
Which is the newest model ... 2763-22 or the -20
They are the same...... -22 means the kit..... -20 means just the tool (no batteries/charger)
Great Review. Thanks!
I have this Milwaukee model and it's a bit strange. If I slowly press on the trigger it will either stall or turn slowly. I have to get on the trigger so it turns the way it should. Anyone else having this problem?
you should also do other brands too
Thank you for this video! Can you do a comparison on the New 2763 High Torque and the New 2861 Mid Torque? Which do you recommend for removing those pesky axle nuts? Is the 2861 fully capable for this?
I have not used a 2861 yet, so I couldn't say either way. A lot of others seem to like them, but no real torque #s (other than marketing hype) is out yet. If I buy one, I will be adding it to the testing to find out.
Will you do a review on the Earthquake 1/2 air impact from Harbor Freight? Mine seems very strong compared to my Kobalt and I am curious how close it comes to the torque numbers claimed.
I'll second that. I have the old 600 ft lb model and it is very heavy and hasn't failed to remove anything yet.
Good vid and was curious at the results being an owner myself!
Does the old style protective rubber boot for the M18 FUEL 3/8" impact fit the new and updated M18 FUEL 3/8" impact?
i have one of thease had it chnaged twice, they rattle and vibrate so much they loos all power,...
That is impressive. Thank you
Quick Question: I just recently got a Milwaukee 7263 (my first of the M18 lineup... but I've owned the M12s for a while), have you had to do any maintenance on your 7263? I've heard of the need to lubricate the anvil every so often.
You have to take the entire tool apart in order to do that.....which will void your warranty. I would suggest watching my video with this impact VS the Snap-on.....in that I show how to do take it apart.
Real Tool Reviews I've actually watched that too. I've watched basically all of your Milwaukee videos haha. How frequently have you lubricated yours?
Never.....that being said, I don't use it nearly as much as someone who does on a daily basis ---- I would like to see what the inside looks like after 1-2 years of hard use....I bet it would be a lot more worn/dry.
i've been researching both the 7263 and the DCF899, and am as of yet undecided. i did see your video comparing those two plus the IR brushless. seeing this kind of gives me an idea which you believe is more durable and better constructed for professional use---am i correct? also, the milwaukee has a much longer warranty period. however, i have been seeing the 7263 offered by different retailers for the same price, but some with 5.0 batts and some with 4.0 batts. would that mean the 4.0s would be the 'old' 2763 and the 5.0s the ;new'?? thanks!!
I like the 3 speed/power modes on the Dewalt.....mode 1 on the Milwaukee is fairly useless. The Milwaukee does have the option for a protective boot which is nice, but I would also suggest looking at the Makita XWT08.....it beats them all & has some very good options with it. If you go with the Milwaukee, yes get the 5.0ah versions.....the 4.0ah are "old stock" & those batteries have been sitting AT LEAST a year.
I was in the same boat as you. I ordered the Milwaukee last night. I'm sure we'd be equally as happy with either. I got it for $359 shipped. I found one on ebay and had Summit Racing price match it. Already shipped and on the way.
ive got the milwaukee and my buddy has the dewalt despite the dewalt being rated higher at 1200ftlbs there has been 3 times where my milwaukee impact would revove the bolt that his wouldn't one was the crank pulley on a toyota 4 runner another was a cross threaded bolt on a 1/2in capacity hydraulic shear and the last was a pully bolt on a 100hp electric motor.
circe801 go snap on they last longer. I've had mine 5 years never had a problem
I believe a lot of factors com into place. First of all I'll say that those numbers themselves are no more different than can be explained by manufacturing tolerances alone.
2nd as another one writes wear in is also a factor. That can be good and bad. Because surfaces gets polished and so slips and hits faster. On the other hand the grease they had when they were new has mostly gone. If you want to relube your impact gun at some point do a test before and after. Wouldn't surprise me if it'll actually loose a little power for a start which it'll regain when grease has been redistributed. However for longevity it's always better with fresh clean grease instead of old full of metal particles.
Ideally you should have bought two back then and if possible from the same batch. They might "not" have changed anything or so they'll tell you. But many manufacturers do change things internally. Usually they make cost and manufacturing "optimizations" as time goes by even for the same "unchanged" model. Often it's not in the advantage of the buyer unless it's an unlucky model having some design flaws to begin with. And then there's also wear on the manufacturing tools not even to mention it might be the same model but nothing that was used to make your old one has been used to make your new one.
I want to see the test with the 2767 1400lb
You should do this test with the earthquake xt cordless impact
Pretty interesting. Any plans to do the same at its next milestone?
The new 2763 posted just about the same numbers as the old one did in the original, 2-year-old, tests. Looks like the old one actually gained power with age...
if i was able to send you a new snap-on 18v cordless impact could you test it against the other cordless impacts? i would need the tool back but i would love to see what you come up with
Are you going to review the Gen II 2767 and 2766 soon?
I wanted to see how a 2 year old battery compares to a new battery on the same tool.
Awesome! Great video,I think I'm going to pick one up now.hey do you think you can do this with the 3/8 version vs snap ons ct8810?please,that snap on is a total piece of garbage and very expensive.i really want to see if the milwaukee is better.
When are u gonna do a review and tq test on a 2767 1/2 gun? No one has a video out yet to show results! Also the Kobolt 1/2 24v brushless impact?
Love your videos. We have one of these at work being used everyday. Is there a need to lube or grease the anvil like an air impact gun?
In the test did the old 2763 impact wrench use new 5.0 ah batteries or the 2 year old batteries that came with it?
I'm waiting for one with a extended anvil with the same torque
Longer anvil = more mass. Period. This is why IR rates the two versions EXACTLY the same with torque specs.
I'm very upset with my Milwaukee 1400' foot pound I haven't even used 20 times and it was light duty uses I came across a bolt it couldn't remove and I used my Craftsman 560' foot pound Air gun and it took right off fast impacts out of the Milwaukee but craftsman slower impacts but stronger Milwaukee is still very powerful but way over Rate it im very upset and this is a perfect example cause the gun is practically new im extremely disappointed.
Marketing hype plagues certain brands....
wow i always wonder this
great job!!!
I liked the video but I'm not sure if it probes anything. The fact that both perform the same doesn't prove that the old one didn't loose power over time. A fair test would be having the numbers of the old one two years ago and the numbers now of the same old one and that would give you a true test.
This test only proves that an old tool performs as the new tool but doesn't prove that the old one didn't have any deterioration.
Anyway I like your videos. Thanks!
Just look at the original review from 2 years ago.
Omgeez dude you should do tv commercials
Do a review on the Carlyle Long Beam Combination metric wrenches from napa part number CHT CWL1219M. They have a similar open end design like Snap-On's Flank drive.
I wonder if the older version did better because of the break in time!! You should use the new one that you have for two years and do this test again and see if it works better than day one. The review that you did two years ago with the now two year old model had very similar test numbers that this new one has. New two years ago was reverse 1,014 and new in this video reverse is 1,019. Thank You for a Great video
valid point, clearly remember, and against Dewalt, it hit 1012,and Dewalt 1014,....... and my Dewalt dw059 1/2" impact, is a joke, was almost a waste of money. ,,,good for changing drive belt's on scooter's, using like a 3/8" cordless. but for anything heavy, even tire's some idiot used an air tool and did not torque,correctly, it can not remove.
saw a review were the guy said new impacts have to much grease so it takes a while for it to move around before u get full torque.
i bet you have about 20 of those sunex sockets by now lol
Nah, he asks for a different size for each video - he's shooting for the whole set. ;-)
Great video👍 thanks for taking the time to put this issue to rest. I can't believe it was an issue anyway, the motor has no brushes to wear and create torque loss. I never believed brushless motors lost power but I am glad you proved it once and for all to shut up the nay sayers.
BrenticusMaximus1 brushless motors are great, they've held up great in the hobby world where they're pushed harder and they don't degrade. I can remember rebuilding and cleaning my brushed motors and being amazed at the regained power.
my theory...the old is broke in and allows for slightly higher readings.
Should do a follow up with the 9.0 battery and see if the numbers increase.
I'm curious too. I have a couple new 9.0amp batteries and the impact wrench above. I haven't had a chance to see if it has more power. I love this wrench. I haven't found a bolt it can't remove. I guess when i do find that bolt/nut I will have to test the 5.0amp battery and the 9.0amp battery. The 9.0amp battery's came with the new Milwaukee brushless miter saw seems quality too.
That does not look like a tool 2 years in the field... just saying
Lmao right
That's either a very well maintained 2 years or a light use 2 years, and he definitely cleaned it off
Now you just need to do a longterm Ridgid brad nailer review to throw some shade at AvE's "this AirStrike stuff won't last that long" :)
I'm fond of Chris' channel, but his "seat of the pants" diss on everything is in stark contrast to your approach in introducing rigour and repeatability to tool testing. It's appreciated.
As much as I find AvE's stuff funny and entertaining, this only reinforces what I"ve know about the 2763. It's got a ton of power and is reliable, the shop I work for has had one for at least 2 years and it's been beaten to a pulp yet stuff knocks nuts and bolts with ease with it's original XC 4.0 batteries. I just bought one myself with XC 5.0 batteries based on it plus a few other M18 Fuel tools for shop use. Power and reliability count and Milwaukee seems to got it nailed with the Fuel line.
He looks like Seth MacFarlane
Can you do a new video...on gen 1 vs gen 2 please....wanna see your 2 cents
Are you ready to give me the old one yet
PLEASE DO THAT TO THE OTHER TOOLS OF MILWAUKEE TOOLS EC
love it thing is epic
rubber boot adds ~15 foot pounds confirmed
didnt expect that lol
New impact: "Hey old timer! Ready to get shown up by the new guy in town?"
Old impact (to IR electric impact): "Ready to see the new guy cry? Hold my beer and watch this sh..."
lol, milwaukee wins over other brands,the older it get the the more power it gains
I see a new impact giveaway coming up! lol
My 2767 better!!
The old Milwaukinese kicked ass for between 3 days -3 months but did a great job before it died, oh wait, that's the new stuff too. Great for home owners though, MILWAUKINESE 4 LIFE!!!
Where did I buy the M18 FUEL 2763-22 can't find 2763 @ Home depot I found only the 2662 ,, I found it on E bay after seeing this video I WANT YOUR 2 YEAR OLD MODEL LOL THANKS
Here you go --- amzn.to/2kTI0pL
Real Tool Reviews THANK YOU VERY MUCH
Guy sounds like a robot
+SraiTdenI beep bop beep beep 🤖
you look like Seth MacFarlane lmao
Hammer always hits harder after grease has been used for a long time for example when you service your impact and put fresh grease in it.It will not hit as hard for awhile