Enjoyed the video, would have liked to see more of the Python in action but you are easy to listen to with the calming voice. Thanks for the TPU gear tip. Keep the channel going.
Thanks for watching. I’m playing around with the enclosure that I didn’t actually show in this video. So I’m going to do a “part 2” with the enclosure assembly and the python in action. Have time this weekend so I’ll try and get that up by tomorrow. Thanks for the suggestions and the support!
Hey, thanks for the review, that was awesome. Btw, RFID support IS coming with the next update in a few days, it can in fact be downloaded in the Discord server already as a beta test (it's actually the final model). Oh I forgot to mention, I've linked to the video from Printables and MakerWorld, I hope you don't mind. Also coming soon is a simplified (and non-modular) version with a smaller footprint matching the width of the X1/P1 printers so 389 mm wide, it's limited to spool widths of around 75-76 mm so not quite as capable. It is also RFID compatible. Finally, Mega Python is coming as well, supporting spools up to 3 Kg (as well as small sample spools and everything in between). It's a few weeks away, approximately.
That is fantastic. I will do an updated video with the additional functions added. Glad you like the video, really enjoy all you are engineering and producing! As I get more setup, I hope to expand on these to provide a higher level of detail based on the feedback I've gotten so far with these videos / reviews. Appreciate your work!
No problem at all with sharing. I'm glad my video is helpful! I also did a video on the hydra pro if you'd like to share that as well - no problem! Sounds like quite a few new updates coming, can't wait to print and share them with everyone. Thanks again for all your hard work.
I saw your Python 1.02 video before this one, but I think it's worth commenting that everything you mentioned that you liked about the Python is exactly why I like the Python so much. Also, I love printing out functional parts that I can use, and not just play around with. It's a bit of a cathartic experience for me to watch the gears moving. I'm getting ready to build the enclosure soon. I've got all the parts, just waiting for the time and motivation.
I just finished getting the enclosure together and have been working on a video for it. I went the passive route, didn't want to spend the money on the polydryer at this time. Should be finishing up soon with that video!
3D printing would be so much nicer if all filament producers would just agree on spool dimensions. Why do some still stick to such weird spool designs that don't fit in the normal AMS? Smart producers should have adapted already to not lose out on the market the AMS and similar systems offer, rather than requiring users to apply mods like this.
I agree 100%. A universal standard would be welcomed. I think it would increase business for a large majority because you'd be able to freely run whatever you want in your multi material systems instead of skipping to one that you know works. It would be good for everyone! Thanks for watching, and I appreciate the support!
I built mine yesterday after printing parts over the weekend. My thoughts: It could probably be done to use more of the dovetail-joint style connections and a few less screws overall. If you're doing screws only (no heatset inserts) then a lot of the screws should be about 2-4mm longer than the official guide suggests. The TPU sleeve/gears are a very good choice to print. It's quiet with them and they operate smoothly.
Those are good inputs if your doing screws only. Having the extra length keeps from pulling threads, not over tightening is a big one too! The TPU sleeve for the gears was a noticeable improvement and has really made the engagement smooth! Thanks for watching, and providing some inputs!
From the discord it looks like Humebeam is working on that. Once those files are available would be happy to print and share those inputs and how it all goes together. Not sure how long before that design is released.
Hey! Sorry for that, looks like when I posted links I didn't get that one copied over! That's a big one! Here's that info below. Thanks for the support and let me know if you need any help! Printed Parts from Voxel PLA voxelpla.com/products/python-bambu-lab-ams-upgrade Python Hardware only 19.99 Python and enclosure hardware only 74.99 Python Hardware and Printed Parts 45.99 Python Hardware / Enclosure Hardware and printed parts (Everything!) 129.99
It works the same as the standard AMS units do. Each unit is 4 feeders. So they would pair together up to 4 AMS units (16 total feeders). Let me know if you have any more questions!
I have an X1C that I haven't used yet so I'm not familiar with the various parts. I don't understand the comment about bypassing the feeder to use abrasive filaments; if the feeders aren't necessary, why are they there?
Hey no problem at all! With that comment, what I mean is the AMS is not compatible with abrasive filaments. An example would be TPU will not work in the AMS, so if you wanted to use it you would have to use a external spool holder, disconnect the ptfe tube running from the AMS hub to the printer and feed the TPU straight into the printer. With the python you can run a separate ptfe tube and utilize the spool holder to run your filament. You’ll still need to split the connection but you can use one of bambu’s 4 to one connectors to run them together or print a 2 to 1 connection. Just makes it easier and makes it so you don’t need the external spool holder or another way to hold that spool.
@@ThePrintasaurus Okay thanks; I can see why an abrasive material might not be good to run through the feeder tubes, but why then do other filaments need feeder tubes?
So, one thing i dont really understand. Ive been making multi color dragons with glow included. Never had an issue really. Well over 1500 hours on my ams before I had to replace anything. Do people have lots of issues with that?
I have not had many problem with the standard AMS. Really the only thing I've had is filament breaking off in the PTFE tubes going out of the feeder motor. Which is usually because my filament was old, or wasn't as dry as it should of been. My AMS units probably have about 1500 hours on them as well. Just PTFE tube replacement, and I've done the rollers around 1000 hours I did the hydra upgrade to see what it was all about, and have had more spools recently that are wider than what the standard AMS supports. I've had issues with the larger spools and the rollers. The python has been much better with those spools, have not had a single issue with retraction or feeding of the filament. I wouldn't say it's issues with the AMS that would sway people to doing either the Hydra or Python mod. More so the ability to tinker and the filament options in regards to spool sizes. That would be the advantage.
That would be great to allow all features of the standard AMS for those that still want to run bambu spools from time to time. I'm looking forward to the option to run up to 3kg spools that is currently in development.
That is true. Without the enclosure you are limited I would say to PLA and PETG in most cases. If you do the enclosure you could add the silica gel box's, but it's not a fully sealed unit. makerworld.com/en/models/515125?from=search#profileId-435416 This is the gel box. The polymaker filament dryers are expensive. It's nice to have some options depending on what you are trying to do. Thanks for watching!
Enjoyed the video, would have liked to see more of the Python in action but you are easy to listen to with the calming voice. Thanks for the TPU gear tip. Keep the channel going.
Thanks for watching. I’m playing around with the enclosure that I didn’t actually show in this video. So I’m going to do a “part 2” with the enclosure assembly and the python in action. Have time this weekend so I’ll try and get that up by tomorrow. Thanks for the suggestions and the support!
Hey, thanks for the review, that was awesome. Btw, RFID support IS coming with the next update in a few days, it can in fact be downloaded in the Discord server already as a beta test (it's actually the final model).
Oh I forgot to mention, I've linked to the video from Printables and MakerWorld, I hope you don't mind.
Also coming soon is a simplified (and non-modular) version with a smaller footprint matching the width of the X1/P1 printers so 389 mm wide, it's limited to spool widths of around 75-76 mm so not quite as capable. It is also RFID compatible.
Finally, Mega Python is coming as well, supporting spools up to 3 Kg (as well as small sample spools and everything in between). It's a few weeks away, approximately.
That is fantastic. I will do an updated video with the additional functions added. Glad you like the video, really enjoy all you are engineering and producing! As I get more setup, I hope to expand on these to provide a higher level of detail based on the feedback I've gotten so far with these videos / reviews. Appreciate your work!
No problem at all with sharing. I'm glad my video is helpful! I also did a video on the hydra pro if you'd like to share that as well - no problem! Sounds like quite a few new updates coming, can't wait to print and share them with everyone. Thanks again for all your hard work.
@humebeam Just wanted to point out you have my name as Printosaurus, it's actually Printasaurus! Pumped to be featured with your stuff!
@@ThePrintasaurus Ouch will fix immediately 😆
any plans on doing this for the CFS..
I saw your Python 1.02 video before this one, but I think it's worth commenting that everything you mentioned that you liked about the Python is exactly why I like the Python so much. Also, I love printing out functional parts that I can use, and not just play around with. It's a bit of a cathartic experience for me to watch the gears moving. I'm getting ready to build the enclosure soon. I've got all the parts, just waiting for the time and motivation.
I just finished getting the enclosure together and have been working on a video for it. I went the passive route, didn't want to spend the money on the polydryer at this time. Should be finishing up soon with that video!
Thank you my friend for your content
Very welcome, thank you for watching and supporting!
Just ordered mine from voxel a couple weeks ago. Now it comes with rfid also can't wait till it arrives to build it myself.
Awesome! Let me know how the build goes. Did you opt for the enclosure as well?
3D printing would be so much nicer if all filament producers would just agree on spool dimensions. Why do some still stick to such weird spool designs that don't fit in the normal AMS? Smart producers should have adapted already to not lose out on the market the AMS and similar systems offer, rather than requiring users to apply mods like this.
I agree 100%. A universal standard would be welcomed. I think it would increase business for a large majority because you'd be able to freely run whatever you want in your multi material systems instead of skipping to one that you know works. It would be good for everyone! Thanks for watching, and I appreciate the support!
I built mine yesterday after printing parts over the weekend. My thoughts: It could probably be done to use more of the dovetail-joint style connections and a few less screws overall. If you're doing screws only (no heatset inserts) then a lot of the screws should be about 2-4mm longer than the official guide suggests. The TPU sleeve/gears are a very good choice to print. It's quiet with them and they operate smoothly.
Those are good inputs if your doing screws only. Having the extra length keeps from pulling threads, not over tightening is a big one too! The TPU sleeve for the gears was a noticeable improvement and has really made the engagement smooth! Thanks for watching, and providing some inputs!
can you add more then 4 together?
You can, I have played around with my second AMS in line with this one with it being a modular design. It takes up a bit of space but is doable.
Yes you could add another AMS, makes for a large setup but you could wall mount this setup and center your printer under if you wanted!
Will there be a update to use the bigger and heaver 2KG spools ?
From the discord it looks like Humebeam is working on that. Once those files are available would be happy to print and share those inputs and how it all goes together. Not sure how long before that design is released.
Can’t seem to find the price or links for the parts I have to order, where do I find it?
Non-printable parts
Hey! Sorry for that, looks like when I posted links I didn't get that one copied over! That's a big one! Here's that info below. Thanks for the support and let me know if you need any help!
Printed Parts from Voxel PLA
voxelpla.com/products/python-bambu-lab-ams-upgrade
Python Hardware only 19.99
Python and enclosure hardware only 74.99
Python Hardware and Printed Parts 45.99
Python Hardware / Enclosure Hardware and printed parts (Everything!) 129.99
Can this be used with the Babu A1?
X series and P series printers. The A1 and A1mini currently only support the AMS Lite.
can you have more than 4 materials?
It works the same as the standard AMS units do. Each unit is 4 feeders. So they would pair together up to 4 AMS units (16 total feeders). Let me know if you have any more questions!
I have an X1C that I haven't used yet so I'm not familiar with the various parts.
I don't understand the comment about bypassing the feeder to use abrasive filaments; if the feeders aren't necessary, why are they there?
Hey no problem at all! With that comment, what I mean is the AMS is not compatible with abrasive filaments. An example would be TPU will not work in the AMS, so if you wanted to use it you would have to use a external spool holder, disconnect the ptfe tube running from the AMS hub to the printer and feed the TPU straight into the printer. With the python you can run a separate ptfe tube and utilize the spool holder to run your filament. You’ll still need to split the connection but you can use one of bambu’s 4 to one connectors to run them together or print a 2 to 1 connection. Just makes it easier and makes it so you don’t need the external spool holder or another way to hold that spool.
@@ThePrintasaurus Okay thanks; I can see why an abrasive material might not be good to run through the feeder tubes, but why then do other filaments need feeder tubes?
So, one thing i dont really understand. Ive been making multi color dragons with glow included. Never had an issue really. Well over 1500 hours on my ams before I had to replace anything. Do people have lots of issues with that?
I have not had many problem with the standard AMS. Really the only thing I've had is filament breaking off in the PTFE tubes going out of the feeder motor. Which is usually because my filament was old, or wasn't as dry as it should of been. My AMS units probably have about 1500 hours on them as well. Just PTFE tube replacement, and I've done the rollers around 1000 hours
I did the hydra upgrade to see what it was all about, and have had more spools recently that are wider than what the standard AMS supports. I've had issues with the larger spools and the rollers. The python has been much better with those spools, have not had a single issue with retraction or feeding of the filament.
I wouldn't say it's issues with the AMS that would sway people to doing either the Hydra or Python mod. More so the ability to tinker and the filament options in regards to spool sizes. That would be the advantage.
RFID support is coming I believe.
That would be great to allow all features of the standard AMS for those that still want to run bambu spools from time to time. I'm looking forward to the option to run up to 3kg spools that is currently in development.
Not a dry box anymore :(
That is true. Without the enclosure you are limited I would say to PLA and PETG in most cases. If you do the enclosure you could add the silica gel box's, but it's not a fully sealed unit. makerworld.com/en/models/515125?from=search#profileId-435416 This is the gel box. The polymaker filament dryers are expensive. It's nice to have some options depending on what you are trying to do. Thanks for watching!
Too much time talking not enough time showing the actual thing
Thank you for watching and the input.