The four pillars of a decentralized society | Johann Gevers | TEDxZug
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ค. 2014
- This talk was given at a local TEDx event, produced independently of the TED Conferences. What if we could rebuild our society in a way that works for everyone? Epochal changes are now underway that are radically transforming how society operates.
Johann will describe this revolution, and how it will create vast new economic opportunities and unprecedented social freedom.
Johann Gevers is Co-Founder and CEO of Monetas in Zug. Monetas is building the world's first universal transaction platform-an essential infrastructure for the society of the future. Johann's lifelong driving passion is to help create a better life and world for everyone, through personal, organizational, and social transformation. It has inspired him to develop a pioneering new legal system for a free society, based on a new Golden Rule. His thirty-year journey searching for better methods and tools-and for freedom and joy for humanity-has profoundly enriched his and others' lives.
About TEDx, x = independently organized event In the spirit of ideas worth spreading, TEDx is a program of local, self-organized events that bring people together to share a TED-like experience. At a TEDx event, TEDTalks video and live speakers combine to spark deep discussion and connection in a small group. These local, self-organized events are branded TEDx, where x = independently organized TED event. The TED Conference provides general guidance for the TEDx program, but individual TEDx events are self-organized.* (*Subject to certain rules and regulations)
We need this now more than ever!
I have been trying to advocate for decentralization for about a year now, nobody seems to comprehend it. Glad I found this video, might help others understand.
yup ive recently realized that it IS the answer also... let's stop trying to fix their broken systems and instead build our own parallel advanced societies that renders their insanity obsolete
I'm not convinced decentralization is the answer to everything.Some things need to be centralized or nationalized such as the NHS or the Railways social housing etc .As private decentralized companies may have different policies that infringe human rights where there is no ability for local decision making within that private decentralized corporation.
@@EIKLURAMI don't see the problem. Let the marginized people create their own decentralized groups as well. That's the whole point of decentralization. If I don't want to to work with certain individuals than I shouldn't have to, and no one should tell me or force me to. And so too, people who feel like their "human rights" are infringed upon can also form their own decentralized organizations.
Quickly:
The Pillars of Decentralization.
1. Decentralized Communication; Communication without censorship, through the internet and cryptography(The latter to make sure it stays uncensored).
2. Decentralized Law; The choice of our law, judge, and our enforcer.
3. Decentralized Production; Anyone allowed to make products(Like 3d print things and using solar panels to get your own energy).
4. Decentralized Finance; Decentralization over currency and legal contracting platforms.
💯 write my manager regarding making millions in B..T..C.+1...2...3....1...4...0...3...4...1...4...5
Thanks - much appreciated!
Decentralisation is a system of advancing humanity and valued all human knowledge with out discrimination....
Decentralization of communication is the master key and foundation for all the others pillars to work effectively.
Yeah as long as you pay taxes on cashing it in. That means the government and the fed still control it.
Wow, I'm just a few minutes into this and he's hitting the nail right on the head. I have always done a good job of arguing for this sort of free society and winning debates against statists. But he's finding some great ways of articulating certain concepts better than I had before. This talk is going to be very helpful to me in spreading the message. I love the opening about Dunbar's number and how people based trust can't scale but technology based ones can scale infinitely. As a software engineer this really strikes a chord with me! Thanks so much for posting this!
The completeness and fundamentality of the concepts in this video are so awesome.
@jesseparker85 Ahem, dont forget the actuals accomplishments inspired by Africans to the greeks, especially Egypt
💯 write my manager regarding making millions in B..T..C.+1...2...3....1...4...0...3...4...1...4...5
Live life Voluntarily
Yessir, yes ma'am!
Excellent talk, I 100% agree with this direction. Love to support this further.
This is SO great. My heart has been in this place for such a long time! Not a pyramid, but a gigantic, interlaced flower of many circles joined together!
this just describes a different pyramid. the value system is ultimately centralized when accruing wealth/excess is still the central purpose. Why should everyone live the same or value the same things? shallow thinking
💯 write my manager regarding making millions in B..T..C.+1...2...3....1...4...0...3...4...1...4...5
@@Jonny_Noname Because having wealth enabled us to have access to basically anything the world has to offer? And to fullfil the basic needs for us to survive in the modern world. As humans we have to strive for something that keep us moving so that we don't fall into existential crisis. So it's pretty much one of the best value system you can get. Without it you'll just be a nihilist and live a life full of pain and suffering and I can guarantee that you don't want that. But, it doesn't mean that you can't get fullfiled by other things, If you have a better value system that suits yourself then go ahead, no one stopping you.
@@Jonny_Noname I wanna hear your take on this though. I'm interested, what sort of a future do you want? What do you propose?
@@ranguy1379 Eh... that's difficult to summarize since there is no one size fits all solution... ultimately a world where power isn't totally centralized in such a way where individuals are required to appeal to a central power before an individual may meet one's individual needs... a world in which we make social/economic choices voluntarily without coercion... a complex multiplicity of diverse competing systems which we are able to opt-in or out if we want to... a world which preserves free-will... which allows people to make either bad or good decisions with the opportunity to live and learn from those choices... I'm for open source solutions... open boarders... medical freedom... and ultimately the dissolution of governments and any other highly centralized power structures such as central banks, central power grids, and centralized inform systems (big tech, big media, big acedemia)
I am deeply touched about the goals - I have learned something very important today -Thank you !
TED these days seems like so much Info Lite. Thank goodness for TEDx!
We are building ALDEA in Latin America based on these principles. Thank you!
I wish to contribute
One of the most inspiring, practical and achievable vision of our future world - Get ready to embrace a de-centralized future built on trust and honesty embedded and enforced into the regulatory system which will enable honest transaction, production and communication free from monopoly, manipulation, abuse of power and conflict. Sounds idealistic but looks achievable!
Blockcain can only enforce integrity of digital information - that can be tested and validated by an algorithm, though.
I hold reservations about the timeline presented, but I like the intent and the concepts make sense at a very high level.
Thanks very for your professional presentation you've increased my knowledge horizon
Best TED talk.
I have agreed with this statement since this video was published.
Great proposal for a Better Society 3.0.
The world of the future can only be based on trust among people who can then build the world of humanity, social justice and ecological responsibility. And these are the true foundations of our future. We need to build a new better world, an ecohumanist world, an alternative world to this world.
The bypass of human trust requirement as enabled by blockchain and other digital systems are only for financial transactions. It doesn't say anything for instance about the genuine value of the product you are buying or the service you are ordering.
amazing TED TALK...great detail...thanks for the post.!
Very intelligent and well presented talk. Thank you very much Johann. 5*
Thank you very much for your professional presentation, you have told me many things.
Feel like I'm a decade late but still glad to have seen this. Goosebumps.
Thank you for this Vision of our Decentralized future where all share in peace, wealth, health, and prosperity. The New Earth is manifesting NOW
This is such an incredible video. Thank you!
Amazing presentation! Great to see people in the crypto currency space who have deep visions beyond quick monetization schemes! Decentralization is key for our future.
Thank's for this important information ❤
Amazing presentation! Thank you!
I appreciated this talk. I don't know if I think this is necessarily achievable or more of an ideal scenario. Still loved the thought process
💯 write my manager regarding making millions in B..T..C.+1...2...3....1...4...0...3...4...1...4...5
The biggest thing we can do as individuals is to begin the mindset shift away from "how can I get the government to solve my problems" to "how can I (or we) solve the problems ourselves?"
Magnificent and encouraging speech. Lot of that he spoke about is already happening
Exactly, it has come to the point where the world is at a turning point. The megalodon capitalist are clinging to a dying centralized system. The pandemic is their last hope to try and control everyone before they can not longer control everything. This is beautiful and I will spend the rest of my life helping the system improve.
Amazing... I have listened to a great thing after a very long time
Grear presentation, I'm currently deep-diving into decentralised energy. Big industry hijacked our "free-market" model. But smart hybrid systems, ie solar/battery & grid power could be the smart disruptor. Anyway, great initiative coming into its own.
I knew this was going to be EPIC!!!🔥🔥🔥
We are getting their BOIS!!!
I enjoyed the breakdown of concepts of a decentralised.
I started thinking about decentralization an hour, ago . I thought about mostly decentralization of information, entertainment, energy (renewable energy!), finance and other services and production. Here I am just watched this interesting presentation.
Not sure about the increased wealth creation, I would say it will and already causes a more balanced wealth distribution, as in a P2P network small entities get more and not only the giant corporations reap most of the rewards for their CEO's and shareholders.
I just realized decentralization addresses so many issues of capitalism (greedy unethical corporations manipulating media and politics) and socialism/communism (suppressing human competition, a centralized power forcing "equal distribution" lead by political elites).
Up 😂 decentralisation would bring capitalist problems to a greater scale. Since everyone participates. Decentralised communism = poverty
Power to the people!
This video is about voluntaryism. If you are not a fan of voluntaryism yet, you will be.
I can't wait. I have a feeling it's gonna be a bumpy ride along the way though.
To AnCapistan we will go
I agree with Roy Smith , once people see the potential of ethereum it will change the world.
Didn't they say the same about Bitcoin?
Cardano is the way
I've always been skeptical on Ethereum. Still am today despite the price around $700 per ETH. I have hope in EOS. It's taking on the same idea with a slightly different approach. And scaling looks to already be solved.
oh you actually meant to say EOS
after one year of your post i do strongly agree with it ;-)
This was an unusually insightful and educational talk. Not another one of those ‘me too’ ‘don’t you realize how great blockchain/bitcoin is’ talks.
brilliantly well versed
You are so ahead of your time!!
this is so beautiful...
Phenomenal!
Core Values Can BE . Please adapt if you all agree to usefulness of these.
1. One should always be
ready to accept truth and to renounce untruth.
2. All acts should be
performed after deliberating what is right and wrong.
3. The prime objective of
new Society is to do well to the world, that is, to promote physical, spiritual
and social good of everyone.
4. Our/Every one conduct
towards all should be guided by love, righteousness and justice.
5. We should dispel ignorance)
and promote (knowledge).
6. No one should be
content with promoting his/her good only; on the contrary, one should look for
his/her good in promoting the good of all.
7. One should regard
oneself under restriction to follow the rules of society calculated to promote
the well-being of all, while in following the rules of individual welfare all
should be free.
Decentralized contracting is ethereum - the biggest of all the changes to come.
My take from this talk is that we need to rid ourselves of all centralized power as they are the problem .
💯 write my manager regarding making millions in B..T..C.+1...2...3....1...4...0...3...4...1...4...5
There's an exploration of this in The Conquest of Bread
No. Centralised power brings equality and organisation, while decentralisation causes inegality ans differences.
The Future Will Not Be Centralized!
Gary Lachance people don't like their fat cash cows being taken away from them... especially people with armies, nukes, virtual monopoly over school systems that can propagandize a nation's worth of kids that the system is the only good and possible system, while simultaneously keeping most away from alternative viewpoints and possibilities.
That's the point of decentralized communication.
Once physcial cash is gone, central banks will take full control of all money and control it at will - including the ability to turn off your access to it in an instant for any reason. Blockchain will become the ultimate centralization tool since only central bankers will be allowed to control it. If you think 'they' are going to allow a system in which they don't have full control, you are sadly mistaken. People will merely be numbered assets on the blockchain, each with a unique token. If you don't comply with their wishes fully, your token will simply be turned off, and you will be excluded from the system. Enjoy your slavery.
The future is a state planned economy with an highly advanced democratic dispensation that accomodates all the workers of all races, sexes and genders. The future is strategic planning of the economy and common ownership of the means of production. The future is communism.
@@saffa321 😂😂😂😂😂😂
The Government and the banks work together to control the labour's wealth, this is a really good idea to protect the residents from being confiscated of their wealth. Hoping the blockchain plan itself really works well, not suddenly block or transaction datum get lost or any IT issue occurs when there is no electricity to charge phones. P.s. Really a good and understandable talk!
Exactly what i was looking for
This is a great start to where we need to go. However, the 'systems' are still controlled by a few..Aren't we just shifting power from Banks to Teleco companies etc? Can someone explain how this can be better delivered or protected?
Great stuff 🙂🙂🙂
Excellent
wow this is what I've been saying we need, law by consensus by the people for the people!
Well, he is speaking here about automatic consensus about a history of bits in a ledger.. Not quite deep democracy yet :)
This guy is a prophet!
SIck gameplay.U so pro bro , good work my man
Does anybody else finds it funny that he knows so much about how social organization and economy used to be in the "millions of years" of human history BEFORE the recording of human history?
It definitely will take some time. People will have to learn on their own, do their own research, etc, and there will be a lot of failures. I do think overall though winners will come through the cracks and their success will thus in turn lead to more people around them learning and having their own successes in the global economy. It will not happen overnight though.
Decentralization requires gentle guidance from above.
Great, You are doing service to God. God will enable success path for noble intentions
I enjoyed this presentation. The only criticism or question I have is when he appeared to diminish the importance of private property and substitute it with competition as the driving force in capitalism. I think one without the other is dead. If you don't have private property , you don't have competition and vice versa. I'm surprised TED let an An-Cap speak but he didn't exactly give the NAP a ringing endorsement either. He steered clear of that. The problem with avoiding the subject is that is without the NAP there will always be another emergency as a pretext that allows for the centralized model.
Competition is not the driving force of capitalism.
As the moral philosopher Adam Smith made clear, competition is the limiting force of capitalism. It is the thing that keeps capitalists from taking over the world.
-dlj.
Nice word salad.
Competition is the driving force of capitalism. It's what re-organizes production and distribution in increasingly efficient ways.
Arising-Tale
I don't think so. People reorganize the ways they make things. The act of reorganizing is what reorganizes.
If two people are trying to reorganize something, we may call that competition.
"Competition" is a word you and some other people apply to the number of people doing the reorganizing. It is not a force. It is a word you applied because there are more than one people doing the reorganizing.
You're the one with the word salad, seems to me.
Since you're a specialist in it, could you do some explaining, please? Is a "driving force" different from a force? Or is it just a decoration, meaning something like "good force" or "force that anonymous Arising-Tale likes"?
Do you agree with me (and Adam Smith) that the development of your increasingly efficient ways has the effect of keeping any one capitalist from taking over everything? And do you agree with us that if it ever didn't, that would be the end of capitalism?
-dlj.
David Lloyd-Jones
I know this thread is a year old, but can we agree that it is both the limiting and driving force of capitalism?
In the digital age local knowledge is value.
Very good present, decntralized is the dream of human.
Decentralized [ communication (space collapse), law-choice of law/adjucator/enforcer (hegemony collapse), production-material/energy (capitalism collapse), finance-fungibility/money/contract (exponential economy collapse) ].
So anarchy lmao. Back to the stone age.
Totally!!
Great presentation for what EOS will provide!
With great power comes great abuse. Powerful statement.
With great power comes great advancement.
With few power comes great crimes.
Noble words...but all those ideals flew out the window once Johann Gevers got his hands on the money.
awesome
Very good points
💯 write my manager regarding making millions in B..T..C.+1...2...3....1...4...0...3...4...1...4...5
Stellar Lumens.
Center of such new society should be based on some strong Moral principals . Please check if below Moral Principal can be useful to apply in core/soul of this transition for Good of Society
1.
One should always be
ready to accept truth and to renounce untruth.
2.
All acts should be
performed after deliberating what is right and wrong.
3.
The prime objective of
new Society is to do well to the world, that is, to promote physical, spiritual
and social good of everyone.
4.
Our/Every one conduct
towards all should be guided by love, righteousness and justice.
5.
We should dispel ignorance)
and promote (knowledge).
6.
No one should be
content with promoting his/her good only; on the contrary, one should look for
his/her good in promoting the good of all.
7.
One should regard
oneself under restriction to follow the rules of society calculated to promote
the well-being of all, while in following the rules of individual welfare all
should be free.
Nice info
Wonderful Presentation!
Wow, killer video 👍🏼
I have seen this long ago but back then I didn't know much about anarcho capitalism.
You've forgotten the most critical pillar, decentralized protection i.e. the local militia
This aged like a fine wine.
who are watching in 2020???
Exactly my question, I suspect that communication control will be the new banking....I wonder if this talk could be updated?
+1...2...3....1...4...0...3...4...1...4...5
5th pillar: decentralized protection is being worked on by the good people at defense distributed. Everyone needs a beofang radio and an AR. At that point we cannot be stopped
Are there differences or similarities between this, and what Free Private Cities do?
You are brilliant and taught me much. That being said I need to question premise around time 622min.
I am hearing alott about cognitive privacy. Including possible cognitive legislation
I believe we have a right to privacy...but I do not necessarily believe that it is essential and that without it we can not be free thinkers.
In order to protect cognitive privacy we simply need,laws that do not allow prosecution or persecution on strictly a cognitive action
The reason being this...we can not be punished for thought crimes we should only be punished for action crimes.
Punishing on perspective or projective crimes is a type of projective, or what I call "mirage law" a law that appears real yet is not.
We can not be punished or censored by surveillance. Surveillance in and of itself is not a punishment tool. It is the negative thoughts surrounding it and the psychol8gical warfare associated with negative emotions,such as fear, guilt,
Those who do not have conscience have less of these and pure sociopaths have virtually non not even for self preservation.
So we see that those who are in part afraid of surveillance fear potentially several things...shame, disapproval, pain, punishment, expresseion
That being said if these fears were addressed and removed, it legislation existed that protected us from prosecution of thought crimes, then we are less threatened by the big monster of transparency.
We have taken privacy 4 granted and used it as a tool for pur advantage and more importantly 4 disadvantage.
Privacy can still be had...the good old fashion way....without technology....1
Having no technological privacy is only one type of privacy. If you look at the different types you still have many...personal, written, verbal, meetings, you do not need to have technology in your home...it is optional...schools yes, buisnesses maybe, relationships that is,built by who you are and whom you are associating with.
So we see clearly that it is not surveillance that stops free thinking...it is,our fear of prosecution, or retribution, or punishment.
Babies and young children have no privacy at all....they are not harmed at all...
Just saying....current reality is we need surveillance not more fear
I Am only in favor if we centralize ecogreen protocols period
And intellectual / cognitive theft ? Powerful stupidity needs smart supply. Surveillance is theft.
Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay!
"These are the pillars to a decentralised society; and there is a logical order to them: First, we communicate what we want to do, then we agree the terms of our cooperation, then we produce the goods we've agreed, and finally we trade the goods and services that we've produced.
Together, these technologies form what I call the Technology of Trust. They will enable ordinary people to communicate, to come to legal agreements, to build products and services and to trade without interference from 3rd parties."
🙌🙌🙌
Cardano is the blockchain that's achieving this vision if you want to look further.
"So what does the world of the future look like? Imagine a Masai warrior on the plains of Africa who has no access to the banks, financial services and the whole infrasture that we take for granted in the developed world. He is cut off fron the global economy. He has no bank account, no lawyer, no financial services; this severely limits his ability to generate wealth. But, he has a mobile phone. And soon, using that mobile phone he can start with a business idea and within minutes he can incorporate a legal entity, and he connect to a global transaction platform that allows him to safetly and securely do business with anyone in the world, including people he's never met, people he cannot trust, and the integrity of the transactions are guaranteed by the technology. This dramatically improves his ability to generate wealth. Billions of people are going to be raised out of poverty, dramatically improving their standard of living"
@@williampardoe2091 yep absolutely. Most people are seduced into exchanging their personal freedoms for "security", basically too lazy to think for themselves and wanting easy and convenient above everything. Meanwhile the "Masai guys" are cashing in big time.
A very interesting talk, but I think the assertion that millions will be lifted out of poverty is a gross exaggeration. I cannot see how merely having access to a payment/money-receiving system, however good it may be in other regards, will give people what they need to start a business. I know it has to be a long, slow process, and that thinking about this in very immediate terms is not an appropriate or beneficial way to consider these ideas, but I cannot see it making that big a difference. I would be happy to have someone offer a simple explanation to me, though....
We have a system in place already, a Micro Loan. A small investment (loan) to purchase a means of some production via a sewing machine or perhaps seed for a garden.... can lift a person up enough to build a sustainable life. Crypto Blockchain offers a means of establishing a minimum amount of trust needed in all 4 pillars. Granted it may take some time yet, but look what we as a community could achieve. To be clear this is NOT aid but business on a small scale.
It isn't about the payment system on it's own. It is about each person thinking about their value, securing that value, and being able to use it in creative ways to solve societal needs with hopes that they receive some reward for it. At the heart of it is privacy. Whether this has come too late and the corporations already have too much data is anyone's guess.
You might not like to donate $2.... But you might 1 cent if you felt it was a good project. Or half of a cent, or a 1/4 of a cent. Something minuscule to you but to someone on a farm out there this means a tractor to speed up work on the fields and get product to the market.
It is a permeation of credit. It is almost impossible to have a basic understanding of economics and not come to this conclusion.
It is so much more than just a payment system. With applications like Ethereum, it is possible to build entire businesses with little more than a product, passion, and a smart phone. The crypto ecosystem will pave the way for people who have never seen real opportunity in their life a chance to truly make something of themselves. Once these deprived countries begin adopt this technology, it will explode, because unlike 1st world countries, third world countries WANT to work to make money, and once they see the way, it will absolutely explode.
I think it's good to also listen to Charles Hoskinsons tedtalk as well. Many don't have the ability to accumulate wealth and history which are the first 2 steps to starting a business. No one is arguing that this is a quick process, but without these fundamentals the process cannot even begin
Decentralized government can actually be practical. However we truely don't live in decentralized government rn. It has some central nature. But we can ofc gradually get to it.
This is our future. 2020
💯 write my manager regarding making millions in B..T..C.+1...2...3....1...4...0...3...4...1...4...5
Quite recently, Peter Joseph brought up this idea of decentralization in his Zeitgeist Movement, which is kinda cool. But I just wonder who is going to enforce the decentralized law thou? Will there be violence?
There has to be some sort of centralization, even in a decentralized society.
As an example, suppose that you are walking in the park one day, when you come across a human body with the blade of a knife in its chest. What happened? Well, you don't know. You are probably not trained in evidence gathering, so you can't conclude the murderer's identity with any degree of certainty. And you can't just accuse someone without evidence. So how do you make sure the murderer is identified? You'd have to contact someone who's trained to gather evidence.
OK, so the investigator claims to have found the murderer. Now who's qualified to argue that this person is a murderer? Who's going to listen to that person's side of the story, and the alleged murderer's side of the story, and from that evidence decide whether the alleged murderer is truly guilty and, if so, how to punish the murderer?
the big hope for sure is in the new technology, but the questions of how exactly to regulate the monopoly of force remain unanswered to me... decentralisation may be able to do it somehow i have to think about it...
In a decentralized society, there would be no government, because that is centralization. Therefore it would be anarchy, having no rulers. People would be accountable to not aggress against others, but aside from that, not really any laws would exist. With that, there wouldn't be this one big power having all the weapons. All military weapons would be universally for sale. Every person could own tanks and whatever else. A decentralized society would not be territory that another nation would want to invade, in other words.
Benjamin K Broderick
Everything you've said sounds right Broderick, but no laws?
It's a little tricky because the way we use the word "law" now entails that all within a certain jurisdiction would be required to abide by the bounds of certain laws. That's why my claim to no laws was ambiguous. Sure there would be rules of individual homes and establishments, and there would be a standard upheld universally throughout society of non-violence and non-aggression, but those would be implicit, as opposed to being written by one official authority and enforced by the same. The non-aggression standard would perhaps be what you might call common-law, or a societal norm and expectation, but not the type of law we are typically used to at this time, written by those who make laws, and imposed universally to all within a geographical region. Decentralized law would be a better term, as it could not remain a decentralized society and still be under centralized law.
The universal necessity of non-aggression is natural and innate in all humans for survival and development, and since all humans typically wish to remain in control of their lives, remain free from suffering, and so on, there is reasonable assurance that humans will continue to insist upon the absence of aggression inasmuch as we employ reason and rationality over the medieval, dark-age pitfalls of blind belief and obedience that we see in the unthinking, non-questioning statist and religious masses around the world.
The standard of non-aggression would surely be the closest and only thing we could compare to laws as we have them now, for no other expectation can be rightfully imposed onto others, and if it is to be a decentralized society, no centralized opinion of what precisely is classified as aggression could be made. This upholding of the non-aggression standard would be an organically flowing process of the collective human conscience, not a regime imposed by a set of law-makers. Third-party arbitrators would be making decentralized decisions, not by precedent or law books, but by their own methods of expertly assessing the disputes and assigning them with solutions.
Perhaps we might say that laws would be written on a case by case basis, applicable for only an individual, and with an expiration date, much like a prescription from a doctor. Furthermore, the offender would be voluntarily agreeing to the decision of those third-party resolving teams, or what we now call courts. The plaintiff and defendant may both agree to sign contract that gives the authority to a firm to assign law over their lives by way of a coin toss. They may instead choose an expert firm that assigns law based on their thorough and complex opinions and because of their reputation for fair judgement. They may choose a firm that legitimately rehabilitates criminality, and assigns law to individuals in need of this rehabilitation from violence, theft, and so forth. Either way, non-aggression would be the standard, and those violating that standard may be imprisoned till they seek to resolve the conflict and be assigned laws on the matter.
Felix Koschar The technological age will enable a decentralized society to work, and the ability to keep law and order. This is what real anarchy is, although decentralization does not carry the shock value, which is why you should use the word to spread this ideology, because most are biased against anarchy, because of the misinformation of it by those who favor centralization or Governments as most call it. I use it all the time to move people towards anarchy, and it works very well, although most do not know it is anarchy.
@@BenjaminKBroderick I don't see what would prevent a group within a decentralized society to collaborate to invade the ressources of another part of it, then share among them the latter - or betray the others and fight for it at last.
How is this in line with globalisation?
Are centralized systems, by the mere fact that they are centralized, undesirable? Conversely, are decentralized systems necessarily desirable? Centralization has efficiencies and allows for quick, unified reaction. Would the benefits of decentralized systems outweigh such benefits?
Thats the problem with centralization. It makes quick quick solutions but every one and every place has different effect to it and needs its own specific need.
If your country bans farming hoes because they are too sharp, the rich farmer in the city may celebrate since he does not even need it, the poor farmer in the country however will be devasted as he need that tool to provide for himself and his family.
@@shalyfemusic We may then theorize that desirability of centralization may have a corelation with how common the issue to be solved is within the affected population. The less generalized the issue, the less decentralization there should be. Question of tuning the thing.
@@MrCounselMmh good point
How can I get involved in this??
MrPisster eat your vegetables
Not in uni yet i suppose ?
future will be decentralized
but i really concerned about one thing
will there be police and judicial system in decentralized system? if yes then how will they work?
did you ever watch that movie called robo-cop?
I love your question. That is why decentralized transaction will never be good a idea. 😂
His idea is that if everyone is sacred, then only physical perturbations would be ban. But yeah it obviously lacks enforcement and commonality
@@juliusgalido2319😂😂😂😂 facts
im on board but how is the block chain decentralized if every transaction is recorded? how is it private if everything is recorded?
he's wrong. Digital IDs will be tied with CBDCs and then we'll be forced to signin to the internet everytime and crypto will be outlawed.
It's decentralised because there is no central authority in control of the block chain. I don't know what you mean by private. It's not completely anonymous, but pseudo anonymous (that might be the wrong way to put it)
очень интересно
I don't know if he is snob or not but gave us a good point- technology frees us.
+Markus Oh How can you think technology frees us ? Humans were born without technology, and free. Technology is just a tool. Either we use it to slave ourselves, or to remain free.
+skzap Free us from this planet. Free us from this solar system. Free us from this Galaxy. Free us from biologically imposed limitation.
But how do you ensure equality throughout all judicial systems? It's what precedes democracy.
You put the blindfold back on lady justice and leave it there.
@@countsolomon but lady justice isn't the same everywhere, when the judicial system is decentralized. Communities could decide to make special laws for minorities and such.
Why not moving forward and design a Resource Based Economy? We don't need Scarcity Based economic systems anymore...
gilbpaul
no one can define what a resource is. therefore it is very hard to create a resource based economy.
Nonsense. We're talking about natural resources which are used by humanity for direct consumption or manufacture.
so basically anything and everything?
Was oil a resource 200 years ago? Was Iron a resource 3000 years ago? Resources are always changing. Technology determines if something is a resource or not. What happens when something that is not considered a resource today becomes a resource tomorrow? Are you just going to confiscate it from the owners?
Luck and Technical advancements play a huge part in wealth disparity. 100 years ago you could have bought desert land in Arabia for a Penny. Today you cannot because they "struck" oil. This is something that people who favor the RBE simply do not understand. You either have to have a central authority own everything because everything can become a resource (after all everything is simply a form or energy) or you own nothing and let the private market work. What you CANNOT DO is confiscate land from people once it becomes valuable.
So I will ask you again. What is a resource?
Cheers
@@shake6321 as you yourself seem to point to, a ressource is simply anything that through a process is transformed into a service.. plus some more or less ambarrassing extra outputs called waste. And indeed, they are relative to technology.
We may not be able to control the direct consequence of an uneven distribution of ressources on the planet. But we can choose to invest into technologies that do not rely upon ressources owned by other states or private actors. And who knows: one day it may be that many of us will start to see the highest fulfillment one gets through sharing and collaboration rather than hoarding and competing. I m a dreamer, but i m not alone :)
Yan Eperon
I am a dreamer aa well. but the “natural order” may make our dreams impossible. thus, i rather have freedom and inequality than tyranny and equality.
we do not need that many more technological advancements to really raise the global standard of living.
One of the reasons the centralized government doesn't like hemp is because is because it is so effective for homesteaders as "food, fuel, fiber, clothe, construction materials, and medicine" that it is an all in one decentralizer. If you let homesteaders grow hemp, they will be able to make shift hundreds of additional products without needing to be a part of the central system. That isn't to say they could make their iphones from hemp for instance, but it is to say that they would become substantially less dependent on average with that ability. They wouldn't need to buy food, fuel, or clothes... That is a pretty big deal on its own...
💯 write my manager regarding making millions in B..T..C.+1...2...3....1...4...0...3...4...1...4...5
Main problem is that smart contracts involving real property can’t be enforced on chain
Buy Kleros(PNK) for decentralized law sirs!
May Father YAHweh bless your understanding.
💯 write my manager regarding making millions in B..T..C.+1...2...3....1...4...0...3...4...1...4...5