The WILDEST INFINITE COMBO In Premodern!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 46

  • @MG-yp1zw
    @MG-yp1zw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    premodern is so much fun! thanks for another video!

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes it is!

  • @85mcarnold
    @85mcarnold 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I was never so excited to register a deck for MOS as this deck once I discovered that Volrath’s Shapeshifter worked in the combo.

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It certainly was a really exciting piece of news!

  • @dionisisstefanitsis6497
    @dionisisstefanitsis6497 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Against landstill the uktabi is very good for answering the furnace.

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      100%, it was just a complete oversight

  • @IPlayMagic
    @IPlayMagic 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I got smashed by this 2 months ago in the monthly, I can confirm its super sweet but explaining the combo takes almost as long as the games do, super sweet video as always

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Never has a deck tech in the beginning been so necessary xD

    • @IPlayMagic
      @IPlayMagic 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@fpawluszmtg yeah 😂 it’s really intense, especially if you have removal and you’re trying to figure out if you can break it up half way through or not😂

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@IPlayMagic Were you able to figure it out on the fly?! If so then kudos to you, my friend! I had to read through the loop like 15 times before I finally understood how it worked. And I still made mistakes!

    • @IPlayMagic
      @IPlayMagic 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@fpawluszmtg no I wasn’t, I got destroyed by it and when it got to the point of being super complicated I just asked my opponent if there was ever any way out of it and he said no and then explained why. The infinitely recurring loop of the karmic guides / shifter is pretty straightforward to understand once you’ve seen it once but all of the other parts and triggers/ responses are still a total blur in my mind 😂

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@IPlayMagic It is a lot... Took me a while to comprehend all the priority holding spots, but once you go through the loop a couple of times it makes sense. I had to actually go through it physically, though. Reading it wasn't enough for me to fully understand what was actually going on.

  • @3o7Mian
    @3o7Mian 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Been playing this and Coco Ichi a bunch. Very fun. I think I prefer Coco Ichi but Pattern is a blast too!

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I don't even know what Coco Ichi is, but it is even as half as fun as this one then I'm in!

  • @issmoul931
    @issmoul931 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    58:00 you get specter and dark rit and withered and you don't side in stp... you keep cabal therapy vs a bottomless pit. Please I need helpv

  • @MrCrazycarlwinter
    @MrCrazycarlwinter 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you're looking for a Rectorable Oath hoser, perhaps Ivory Mask?

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lanny suggested that, but it simply doesn't do enough unfortunately...

    • @MrCrazycarlwinter
      @MrCrazycarlwinter 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@fpawluszmtggood against burn as well, though!

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MrCrazycarlwinter Mask is not as close to gg against Oath decks for me to want to include it. I'd rather have Tsabo's, which is much better there while having value against Landstill and other control decks. I do think I'd run a Sphere of Law, which doubles as Burn and Gobs hate, and it's quite strong against both.

  • @CallMekwech
    @CallMekwech 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've always heard Shapeshifter is bugged on Magic Online, does it not happen to effect this combo? was that info just wrong?

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Shapeshifter is bugged specifically alongside Phyrexian Devourer, which makes it impossible to play FEB variants. But fortunately it doesn't affect this deck at all!

  • @dionisisstefanitsis6497
    @dionisisstefanitsis6497 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    At the end of match 2 you would bring akroma right? You cant instant win from this spot.

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That was going to be the plan. My opponent simply figured out that they wouldn't win from there with me at 11 and their only card in hand being an Incinerate.

  • @issmoul931
    @issmoul931 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing deck, thanks for the show

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks, glad you liked it!

  • @brianontiveros-kersch2412
    @brianontiveros-kersch2412 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sphere of law only reduces damage to YOU, it reduced all red damage goblin bombardment would be turned off.

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Right, but that's kind of what I'm looking for since I don't really care that much about my creatures dying. Also it only prevents damage to me, so the Bombardment kill wouldn't be affected.

  • @nate417
    @nate417 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is Phage the Untouchable too cute as a SB card?

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I don't think it really solves any problems the deck has, and this deck doesn't want to be casting Shapeshifter if it can avoid it.

  • @issmoul931
    @issmoul931 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Premodern comment + like

  • @seanswerdan7639
    @seanswerdan7639 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can pandemonium go in this deck?

    • @3o7Mian
      @3o7Mian 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, and it normally does! It combos with saproling burst to have a pure enchantment based win.

  • @Gerard-z5m
    @Gerard-z5m 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Let’s go!

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Fuck yeah!

  • @benjones1717
    @benjones1717 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is black necessary? Is blue necessary?

    • @85mcarnold
      @85mcarnold 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Black is absolutely necessary.

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Black definitely is because being able to Survival for a 1 mana sac outlet is very good, and Therapy is a great enabler for your "B Plan" of putting a Symbiotic Wurm into play. Whether Blue is is one of the many things that I want to test and explore about this deck.

  • @Wishfigurecollector
    @Wishfigurecollector 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    🤩

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Este mazo es una locura, papá!

  • @CarloGoiff666
    @CarloGoiff666 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    omg dude YOU NEED THERAPY TO SACRIFICE CREATURES AND YOU KEEP SIDEBOARDING THEM OUT!

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I have other sac outlets... Which are better, and tutorable. Therapy seems like the worst "enabler" by a considerable amount. As I said multiple times during the video, I am not familiar enough with the deck to know whether you can do stuff like sideboard the 2nd Goblin Bombardment and other things like that, what I know is that I don't really want to go below 23 creatures in a Survival deck with no cantrips.

  • @issmoul931
    @issmoul931 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    51:00 you instant concede in front of a main deck physician furnace... then u proceed to side and you don't side in uktabi and naturalize. Anyone can explain please? Am going to shoot my self otherwise. I have head hache since I saw this

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's called "making a mistake", I tend to do that quite often :P

    • @issmoul931
      @issmoul931 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@fpawluszmtg i don't play mtgo, is there a timer for the sb? That's why you rush for the sb plan each time

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@issmoul931 There's a 3 minute timer, which is often enough. I do cut all the time that I spend thinking, for the purpose of the video.