Love your vids you are doing such a good job Anton you post every day and your content is awesome that's why you are my favorite youtuber happy early 100k ❤️
It's just incredible that our Sun can have an influence on so many objects that are so far away. This is what boggles my mind about so called "gravitational force." How our Sun holds these objects in orbit yet does not stop their rotation.
There's also that unexpected gap at the verge of the Kuiper Belt: statisticaly, the number of objects should increase, however it appears that the number of objects beyond a certain point in the Kuiper Belt dramaticaly dicreases, which could be explained by the presence of a ninth planet.
Working from the assumption that these weirdly inclined orbits are due to “Planet Nine” is there any way to work backwards and roughly guess where P9 would have had to have been to influence the orbits in the way observed and maybe narrow down the area where it would now be? Great vids btw!
Richje C For navigation you always need a time. With this little to go on, not knowing exactly (galactically speaking) when the planets were influenced you cannot know how they were influenced and where they were when they were influenced. This makes it pretty much guessing.
Day Z Hamburgler no I said “what” to the comment about “them knowing where it is it’s just invisible”, because nobody know where it is nor is it possible for it to be invisible.. Dumb comment
5:50 It’s NOT surprising that Earth’s orbit “doesn’t have much” inclination, since orbital inclinations are measured relative to the plane of Earth’s orbit! Earth could be the planet with the weird inclination and it wouldn’t show up if you assume zero inclination means “normal”.
@@misshap100 You might think orbital inclinations would be measured relative to the Sun’s axis of rotation, since that is the way other orbital inclinations are typically measured, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. Inclinations are measured relative to the “ecliptic”, which is the plane of Earth’s orbit. The Sun’s rotation is tipped at 7.25 degrees relative to the ecliptic. (And, the mean orbit of the gas giants is inclined about 6 degrees relative to the Sun’s equator.) Measuring relative to the Sun might be more logical, but measuring relative to the Earth’s orbit is much easier at a practical level, and this was especially true in the early days of astronomy.
The nearest star is somewhere around 268000 AU away from our sun. When you think about it if planet 9 as hypothesized to be between 780 to 1000 AU away from our sun is very close by comparison. Technology is continually evolving, and it is just a matter of a few years or months till Planet 9 is discovered. Basically speaking, Planet 9 is right in our solar system's neighborhood, a close relative as you will.
Planet 9 does likely exist, but it's so far from the Sun even compared to dim Pluto and so little sunlight falls upon it to reflect back to Earth that it will be very difficult to actually observe and confirm it. Maybe we'll get lucky and just enough infrared is emitted by this planet for the JWST to discover it.
Or there is another less exciting possibility: Planet 9 is responsible for all of this but it was ejected from solar system long time ago. And that's why we can't find it, even though now we can locate even smallest objects on the outskirts of solar system.
I feel that what more likely exists out in that region of our solar system is a brown dwarf companion star to our sun. I don't think anything as small as a planet (even Jupiter sized) could have the effect on Kuiper Belt objects. It would need to be much larger, like a brown dwarf that orbits about our sun where at some points, it gets closer to our system, therefore disrupting it at those times.
yes. or a rogue planbet or even a galaxy or something yet to be discovered. so many possibilities. seeems like the scientific process no longer in use. they all guess something and they try to find a way to prove it hahaha
@@richardjones3308 Other possibilities don't preclude the possibility that there's an undiscovered planet in our solar system though. By definition what they're doing is attempting to prove a hypothesis, which is part of the scientific method. Likewise with the planet X theory, unless it's found it's just a theory and doesn't preclude other possibilities. Now say in looking for Planet X they find a wandering star of the correct mass and can trace it's trajectory backwards to a point where it was close enough to the sun to have caused the planet's orbits to shift. But, being true believers in Planet X, they hide all the evidence so they can keep cashing the grant checks in the search for a planet. That would be abandoning the scientific method.
According to the scientists who are studying this, Planet 9 has an orbit of 17,000 years with an inclination of either 18 or 48 degrees, unless there is more recent evidence indicating otherwise. I've also heard that this object may be responsible for the Kuiper Belt's existence...
When Scholz's star passed approximately at the distance of this alleged 9th planet's apogee around 70,000 years ago... it could explain all the things I've seen if it passed in the right spot
Well if it’s further then Pluto then it’s orbit would be much more unpredictable so theoretically it could come relatively close to earth at a certain time in its orbit and mess up the tides ETC causing the so called great flood or wtvr
your work is so real and i hope you are so blessed by all of your discoveries. i LOVED the ring intro although the volume was down, I had no problem with its interesting factorization.
The cases that you put forward seem to suggest a foregone conclusion but we are discovering that the Universe is far more bizarre than we can imagine. If there is a planet nine is it a gas giant or a rocky planet? Did it form as part of the Solar System or is a captured object? Following that line of thought what if all the anomalous cases that you cited are due to a passing object? Even the theory that the Sun had a twin that has long since moved away could answer some of the questions.
Anton Petrov, Perhaps instead of a planet nine or in addition to it, the passing of Scholz’s star 70,000 years ago within just 8/10ths of a light year, could explain the perturbations and inclinations in the orbits of these Oort Cloud objects.
The evidence points to the existence of Planet X. I remember watching a video about this a couple of years ago, and even after making complicated orbital projections and determining where it should be, it's still insanely difficult to find it. Technology needs to advance for a few more years or decades before it's found. Cheers
@@mysticnomad3577 Scholz's Star, and any biological texts printed after 2005 has a chapter about the genetic bottle neck reading is fun my friend give it a try.
Small thing: it's perihelion rather than perigee when it's about the closest approach to the sun rather than approach to a planet of its moon. Thanks for the informative video!
so basically, the objects going in an opposite direction of the rotation is an object that 'whipped' around planet 9 sent in the opposite direction?! that kinda makes a lot of sense!
Good video WTM , not biased in either direction just facts and possibilities. It's an old story but like most legends it has some origin of truth. I'd be delighted if it was discovered to be Nibiru.
Wouldn't it be cool if the next probe we send out to a planet like Uranus, Neptune, Saturn- was able to take a photo of the entire planet in the background of an image of itself. A selfie. I think it would be awesome to see one of these planets contrasted with something we've sent out to it. I think seeing images of the planets themselves, although amazing; is somewhat underwhelming because of all of the similar artist impressions etc that we see
It was a story made up to see how many people would be gullible enough to believe it,there is a ninth planet,it's called Uranus,and that's where people have their head shoved up
Calculus is such a wonderful thing. Gave me an edge when i took the math placement exam. all of the questions in less then 30 minutes and the last one was the final exam for math `151 advanced calculus. No work just the answers. They know this due to having the test tested at a lab for pressure and erasure marks. Blew their minds. But then i did not really think about it but by 10 years old i was at a 200 inch telescope plotting locations with the PhDs. I knew the math already.
Hi Anton, have you done any research into why the Kuiper cliff exists? I recall there was some speculation about an earth sized planet but it was only speculation (planet 10 assuming planet 9 is discovered) and if it did, wouldn't it of been big enough and close enough to have been picked up in the survey?
Anton, Planets moving "against the flow" use the English word, *Retrograde* Titan is the main example, i know you know what I'm talking about, but you seem to be able to remember the English word for it, so I thought I'd help you out! :D EDIT: After I paused the video, 2 seconds later you said "retrograde"...well...that was anti-climatic haha
Planet # doesn't amaze me as much as the fact we've gotten to the point of understanding the orbit of an object we can't see by disturbances in orbits of other objects we basically can't see or can just barely see.
Pluto is still commonly referred to as "planet". It doesn't matter how scientists like to define words. They don't get to dictate language. They call it a "dwarf planet" which would actually make it a planet by the rules of the English language.
Great video. Since we know nothing about planet nine, I wonder what the odds are of it being an interstellar black hole with 10 times the mass of the earth. That would be a cool simulation to see the affects of.
That would mean theres hundreds of other planets too Ceres, Haumea, Sedna, Eris, etc. ...Do you want your planet memorization in school to be that hard?
Black Hole yeah seriously and there's so many that aren't even named yet (shoutout to my boy 2007 OR₁₀) that'd be a pain in the ass to memorize for school
Idea for an epic sci-fi thriller: We can't see planet 9 because from our vantage point it isn't moving, except in one direction...straight for Earth! Keanu Reeves can play the hero, loosely based on me, of course.
Planet nine is a dwarf planet. There may be four of them beyond Pluto. I know currently planetary scientist may claim more, but officially and eventually it may come down to four. This will give the solar system a total of 12 potentially inhabitable planets (4 rocky, 4 gas and 4 dwarf). But could not the inclinations of the planets be a result of the late heavy bombardment. Maybe those 5 subjects of evidence could be caused by different planetary phenomena or movements. Oh, I just heard, ad you said five separate solutions. Your video reports never fail to be informative and impressive! Thank you!
The two outer gass giants were predicted before they were actualy found. Could be the same situation, except that finding something at 800 AU is a hella lot more difficult.
According to latest Research Our Solar System rotates on a plane that is perpendicular (90°) to that of the Galaxy... However, it still orbits the Galaxy on same plane as all other bodies... This research describes this motion of the Solar System as a Cork Screw effect while orbiting around the galaxy... This would cause a slight angle in Planetary Orbits around the Sun...
If it exists, we should be able to find it the same way we fine a lot of other extra-solar planets: “star wobble”. By carefully observing the movement of the sun, we should be able to determine exactly where to look, and just how much mass to look for.
It seems that the common 'Lay' person often confuses the size of a planet with its density. It could WELL be a very small - yet quite DENSE object that is quite influential - but too small to easily visually detect.
Could someone please explain to me why a super dense mass rotating inside the sun itself wouldn't accomplish the same effects as a planet 9? Thank you.
We can only "see" what emit's or reflects light. The moon for instance does not emit light of it's own , it reflects light from the sun. So we can see it. Moving to the stars they are suns and emit light even from millions and millions of light years away. BUT we can "see" those star's planets by the periodic dimming of those stars light as the planets cross the line between us and those stars.If you are out late at night and there is a light down the road and the light dims for a second it would not be unreasonable to guess that something moved across the path of that light , like a deer or a person. We can also infer the existence of remote objects by the deviance of celestial bodies motions from the expected motions. Hope this makes sense coming from a non scientist like me. If anyone can explain this better please do so and I will delete this.
For a moment in the beginning, I thought you sounded exactly like The Yamiks… Anyway, good review of the currently known evidence. But that still doesn’t acknowledge if NASA or other institutions are onboard, or to what degree they think it is possible.
And the only reason why the moon is considered a "moon", is because it is a satellite of a planet. Ganymede, the largest moon in our solar system is bigger then Mercury. But we have not reclassified it... Just saying.
Well, Ceres, the largest planet in the asteroid belt, was considered a planet between 1801 and the 1850s, along with other asteroids, Juno, Pallas and Vesta. Pluto had not yet been discovered, and Neptune (the only planet discovered by mathematical prediction rather than direct observance--Planet Nine could be the second one) so textbooks back then may have said that we had ten planets. By comparison, Pluto was officially classified as a planet for 75 years or so, so we're not tipping that much bigger of a sacred cow by re-classifying it. If we were to classify Pluto as a planet, then our solar system today might be considered to have fourteen planets if you include the other dwarf planets (include Ceres, the only asteroid dwarf planet). Eris, discovered in 2005, has greater mass than Pluto and has only a slightly smaller diameter, Plus, there are at least six more objects that have been discovered that could end up being classified as dwarf planets, so if we count those as planets, that could bring us to twenty. It just shows how fluid our classification of solar system objects are and as we learn more about them, these classifications might change again.
Personally, I think it would be amazing to see an earth(ish) sized moon orbiting around a Jupiter+ sized planet similar to the Avatar movie. I think that would throw our definition of planet into complete disarray. Unfortunately, I doubt I will every glimpse that in my lifetime. I also would have no problem stating that we had 20+ planets in the solar system.
Travis Ladegast Yeah and i would totally like to call the sun a cow and the earth “planet c-farth568” just because” But the facts are facts and we can’t discuss on them just because we like that way or the other. And the fact that pluto like many other dwarf planets is not a planet it’s irrefutable. Yeah many things were said between 1801 and 1850 but now we’re in 2017 and we are a much advanced society, i can’t believe that there is still people who disagree with science.
By you saying that planet nine is probably exists is scaring the heck out of me because conspiracy theories that says on October 16th planet nine would absorb earth.
*naked eyes Also, the chances of Planet 9 coming in that close are smaller than that of being hit by a falling satelite, being struck by lightning, being killed by a fire tornado, and winning the lottery all at the same time.
Don't let this distract you from the solid fact that Red Lobsters Ultimate Feast price went up $4 and the portions got noticeably smaller. You only get 4 biscuits instead of 5 for a table of 2!!! Not fooling me!!
I wonder if Pluto knows that millions of people on the other side of the solar system are pissed off on behalf of Pluto and fighting for Pluto to once again be named a planet? Wholesome
Anton, love your work,uneven if I have told you off in the past. 😁 Planet 9 has already been found, or perhaps it's planet "stellar core". Go to Planet X News YT channel and see for yourself. There is a huge "something" in close orbit of the sun on a 28 day, eccentric cycle. Please take a look and do a video. I'm sure that Scott, who runs the channel would welcome the help.
9:25 It ISN'T "Like" looking for a tiny tiny tiny dark spot in the sky from really really far away distance. ... IT IS looking for a tiny tiny tiny dark spot at a really really far away distance.
looking for pluto rage comments
Well, at least Pluto is more than "PROBABLY" real.
Much like the Cake, Pluto is not a lie, but a real thing.
Travis Thompson Says some geek in a lab. They lie to keep us in the dark, Pluto is a planet.
9th planet confirmed.
Pluto is my puppy dog planet..such a cute 9th planet. Mickey would be proud.
If a dwarf planet isn't a planet, then by the same logic a dwarf person isnt a person.
If it is ever discovered: It needs to be called Vulcan (Roman god cast away from Olympus)
It probably won't be. It will be something stupid and socio political and trendy. As well as gender neutral.
"Vulcan" is the name of a now-discredited hypothetical planet between Mercury and the Sun. It would be confusing to reuse the name.
@@ethank.6602 bruh the solar system planet are named after Romans and Greeks gods
Do you think they will going to change that?
@@ethank.6602 Like?
@@uhh-8445 Greta Thunberg
May Anton live for ever,damn mate since i am watching you i learned so many things.thank you!
Love your vids you are doing such a good job Anton you post every day and your content is awesome that's why you are my favorite youtuber happy early 100k ❤️
DarKshAdoW Gaming I saw Messi. Have my like.
So funny and Anton's accent and his Cadence seems to have changed over the last 2 years
Did you say candice
yes, and he's thankfully dropped that "what da math"
@@da_poopoo_dealer3152 no dont
It's "Planet Nine from Outer Space."
Planet 9 is currently searching for Planet X, it will call you back as soon as it can, now leave a message. Hee hee
Love the comment by the way. Yours not mine. Will Somebody else post my previous comment, please! I thought it was pretty cool.
SHAME. SHAME. SHAME.
And then there was none. 9 ain’t there. It was only because we surveyed one section of the sky than the others
Aquabats rock!
It's just incredible that our Sun can have an influence on so many objects that are so far away. This is what boggles my mind about so called "gravitational force." How our Sun holds these objects in orbit yet does not stop their rotation.
Great video. It caused a bit of a Mandela Effect on me, as I believed this was a established fact for years Planet Nine existed.
Pluto is a dwarf planet as it hasn’t cleared its surrounding area of objects yet. Pluto is also literally smaller than our moon.
Still Not established Fact.......
There's also that unexpected gap at the verge of the Kuiper Belt: statisticaly, the number of objects should increase, however it appears that the number of objects beyond a certain point in the Kuiper Belt dramaticaly dicreases, which could be explained by the presence of a ninth planet.
Very true didn't think of that. It makes a lot of sense since a planet must have a cleared orbital region
@@siiera1177 im a child care to explain? if you dont have time i totally get it
@@thatonezeldafan5275 it means that it doesn't have any celestial bodies in its orbital region like as in the path it follows
It smashed all the shit out of the way already so when it orbits there is nothing in its path
PLUTO is the 9th planet, it's a dwarf planet but still a planet.
Working from the assumption that these weirdly inclined orbits are due to “Planet Nine” is there any way to work backwards and roughly guess where P9 would have had to have been to influence the orbits in the way observed and maybe narrow down the area where it would now be?
Great vids btw!
Richje C
For navigation you always need a time. With this little to go on, not knowing exactly (galactically speaking) when the planets were influenced you cannot know how they were influenced and where they were when they were influenced. This makes it pretty much guessing.
Yes they know where it is it's just that it's invisible
Maree McGlashan what .-.
@@radradishradiator not enough light present to see it is my guess
Day Z Hamburgler no I said “what” to the comment about “them knowing where it is it’s just invisible”, because nobody know where it is nor is it possible for it to be invisible.. Dumb comment
Been on a binge since I discovered your content... great work, mate! Love your stuff, you have earned a sub!
That’s planet 10, the IAU has no authority to demote Pluto!
A dumb
5:50 It’s NOT surprising that Earth’s orbit “doesn’t have much” inclination, since orbital inclinations are measured relative to the plane of Earth’s orbit! Earth could be the planet with the weird inclination and it wouldn’t show up if you assume zero inclination means “normal”.
are you sure, isn't inclination measured relative to the spin of the sun?
@@misshap100 You might think orbital inclinations would be measured relative to the Sun’s axis of rotation, since that is the way other orbital inclinations are typically measured, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. Inclinations are measured relative to the “ecliptic”, which is the plane of Earth’s orbit. The Sun’s rotation is tipped at 7.25 degrees relative to the ecliptic. (And, the mean orbit of the gas giants is inclined about 6 degrees relative to the Sun’s equator.) Measuring relative to the Sun might be more logical, but measuring relative to the Earth’s orbit is much easier at a practical level, and this was especially true in the early days of astronomy.
Congrats on 100k! I've been here for a long time getting all my information from you, thanks😄
Hello Anton
Hi eris is very late late by 30 years.
You lonely
Hello wonderful person
I am not Anton but hello sedna
The nearest star is somewhere around 268000 AU away from our sun. When you think about it if planet 9 as hypothesized to be between 780 to 1000 AU away from our sun is very close by comparison. Technology is continually evolving, and it is just a matter of a few years or months till Planet 9 is discovered. Basically speaking, Planet 9 is right in our solar system's neighborhood, a close relative as you will.
Planet 9 does likely exist, but it's so far from the Sun even compared to dim Pluto and so little sunlight falls upon it to reflect back to Earth that it will be very difficult to actually observe and confirm it. Maybe we'll get lucky and just enough infrared is emitted by this planet for the JWST to discover it.
I've been looking forward to your coverage of Planet Nine, thank you!
"So whether Planet Nine exists or not . . . time will tell"
*AHEM*
Pluto what
Everyone forgets about Pluto ;-;
Pluto Goteem
You're just a midge- I-I-I mean dwarf planet.
Pluto Sorry Pluto you are a dwarf planet
Or there is another less exciting possibility: Planet 9 is responsible for all of this but it was ejected from solar system long time ago. And that's why we can't find it, even though now we can locate even smallest objects on the outskirts of solar system.
Well this is the first time I have ever watched one of Anton’s videos the day they came out
I feel that what more likely exists out in that region of our solar system is a brown dwarf companion star to our sun. I don't think anything as small as a planet (even Jupiter sized) could have the effect on Kuiper Belt objects. It would need to be much larger, like a brown dwarf that orbits about our sun where at some points, it gets closer to our system, therefore disrupting it at those times.
Could a close pass by with another star, however long ago, also explained it?
yes. or a rogue planbet or even a galaxy or something yet to be discovered. so many possibilities. seeems like the scientific process no longer in use. they all guess something and they try to find a way to prove it hahaha
@@richardjones3308 Other possibilities don't preclude the possibility that there's an undiscovered planet in our solar system though. By definition what they're doing is attempting to prove a hypothesis, which is part of the scientific method. Likewise with the planet X theory, unless it's found it's just a theory and doesn't preclude other possibilities. Now say in looking for Planet X they find a wandering star of the correct mass and can trace it's trajectory backwards to a point where it was close enough to the sun to have caused the planet's orbits to shift. But, being true believers in Planet X, they hide all the evidence so they can keep cashing the grant checks in the search for a planet. That would be abandoning the scientific method.
According to the scientists who are studying this, Planet 9 has an orbit of 17,000 years with an inclination of either 18 or 48 degrees, unless there is more recent evidence indicating otherwise. I've also heard that this object may be responsible for the Kuiper Belt's existence...
Theres should be 9 reasons, since it planet 9 -or a reason with NEIN hitler joke-
-NEIN NEIN NEIN-
+Comяade Sans
wheres papyrus?
-Also megalovania is [name] theme-
When Scholz's star passed approximately at the distance of this alleged 9th planet's apogee around 70,000 years ago... it could explain all the things I've seen if it passed in the right spot
Could planet 9 be Niburu (with all the wild effects some believe every 3600 years)?
Bruce G yes
No.
Yes it can be. If yes, it will answer a lot of questions particularly about religion...
@@mrskye08 Smoke another one. No, it cannot be.
Well if it’s further then Pluto then it’s orbit would be much more unpredictable so theoretically it could come relatively close to earth at a certain time in its orbit and mess up the tides ETC causing the so called great flood or wtvr
your work is so real and i hope you are so blessed by all of your discoveries. i LOVED the ring intro although the volume was down, I had no problem with its interesting factorization.
I am janna Stevens. Like Venus
Excellent channel so glad to find it. Thanks
The cases that you put forward seem to suggest a foregone conclusion but we are discovering that the Universe is far more bizarre than we can imagine. If there is a planet nine is it a gas giant or a rocky planet? Did it form as part of the Solar System or is a captured object? Following that line of thought what if all the anomalous cases that you cited are due to a passing object? Even the theory that the Sun had a twin that has long since moved away could answer some of the questions.
That’s no planet. It’s a Death Star piloted by Darth Jesus.
ARMEGGEDON
Roflmao
Anton Petrov, Perhaps instead of a planet nine or in addition to it, the passing of Scholz’s star 70,000 years ago within just 8/10ths of a light year, could explain the perturbations and inclinations in the orbits of these Oort Cloud objects.
This is awesome! Thanks!
The evidence points to the existence of Planet X. I remember watching a video about this a couple of years ago, and even after making complicated orbital projections and determining where it should be, it's still insanely difficult to find it. Technology needs to advance for a few more years or decades before it's found. Cheers
Just so we all agree, we're going to name it Yuggoth right?
Been an avid watcher of your content but with this video you just gained yourself a new follower.. Great work dude..
75 thousand years ago a star passed through our solar system. "Genetic bottle neck" could that account for the inclination?
Oh please.
You got proof of that B.S.?
@@mysticnomad3577 Scholz's Star, and any biological texts printed after 2005 has a chapter about the genetic bottle neck reading is fun my friend give it a try.
@@thomasmackie922 Oh, SNAP!!
@@thomasmackie922 I'm well read.
More than you know.
Oh, double snap.
@David Renton they can hypothesize all they want.
Until it can be proved by the scientific method it is science fiction.
But now the question is, how did/could have planet 9 formed?
Small thing: it's perihelion rather than perigee when it's about the closest approach to the sun rather than approach to a planet of its moon. Thanks for the informative video!
so basically, the objects going in an opposite direction of the rotation is an object that 'whipped' around planet 9 sent in the opposite direction?! that kinda makes a lot of sense!
Hello...
Goodbye...
Original comment, donut steel.
Aww
I love you
Good talk. Lets do it again sometime.
There are more planets floating between systems than there are orbiting stars. I would take a close look at this as a possiblity.
It would be fun to insert planet 10 into the inner solar system :P
Aight who wants to kick the moon out into interplanetary space
If you like utter chaos and deaths of animals and people.
Good video WTM , not biased in either direction just facts and possibilities.
It's an old story but like most legends it has some origin of truth.
I'd be delighted if it was discovered to be Nibiru.
Planet X is now Planet IX.
It was demoted with pluto.
Wouldn't it be cool if the next probe we send out to a planet like Uranus, Neptune, Saturn- was able to take a photo of the entire planet in the background of an image of itself. A selfie. I think it would be awesome to see one of these planets contrasted with something we've sent out to it. I think seeing images of the planets themselves, although amazing; is somewhat underwhelming because of all of the similar artist impressions etc that we see
Planet 9 should be named after Goddess Hecate (Roman name Hekate), Queen of the Night.
Why? Beyond that all the other planets are named for their appearance except for earth
@@austinbryan6759 i mean planet 9 could possibly be a very dark blue/gray, which could be tied to the night.
Planet 9 is actually the astroid belt. Planet 10 is known as Marduk.
I can kinda tell that Anton isnt really believing in planet 9 😅
Simon 2810 ikr
Simon 2810
We need something to replace pluto.
It was a story made up to see how many people would be gullible enough to believe it,there is a ninth planet,it's called Uranus,and that's where people have their head shoved up
@@jeffdunnell508 uranus is the seventh planet, no matter if you count Pluto or not
@@tspoon772 Exactly. Neptune is the eighth planet.
Calculus is such a wonderful thing. Gave me an edge when i took the math placement exam. all of the questions in less then 30 minutes and the last one was the final exam for math `151 advanced calculus.
No work just the answers. They know this due to having the test tested at a lab for pressure and erasure marks. Blew their minds. But then i did not really think about it but by 10 years old i was at a 200 inch telescope plotting locations with the PhDs. I knew the math already.
PLuTo iS StIL A pLANet In mY heART
Vertically challenged planets rise up!
Only in your heart
It's probably even further out than they postulate. It would probably be very dark, also. When they find it--they should name it Remus. (Star Trek)
"...A number nine large.."
Hi Anton, have you done any research into why the Kuiper cliff exists? I recall there was some speculation about an earth sized planet but it was only speculation (planet 10 assuming planet 9 is discovered) and if it did, wouldn't it of been big enough and close enough to have been picked up in the survey?
Anton, Planets moving "against the flow" use the English word, *Retrograde*
Titan is the main example, i know you know what I'm talking about, but you seem to be able to remember the English word for it, so I thought I'd help you out! :D
EDIT: After I paused the video, 2 seconds later you said "retrograde"...well...that was anti-climatic haha
Titan doesn't orbit retrograde. Triton does.
S.A. Smith Anti-climaCtic. It's not like it was against the environment or something, as in "anti-climatic"
I guess you people don't have auto-correct do you?
Planet # doesn't amaze me as much as the fact we've gotten to the point of understanding the orbit of an object we can't see by disturbances in orbits of other objects we basically can't see or can just barely see.
Is planet 9 what people call Nibiru? Also, someone told me 'Nibiru' was near Neptune's orbit, which I thought was absolutely absurd.
Neptune is closer to you, than Planet 9 would be to Neptune even at it's closest approach.
Nibiru is just an old name for Jupiter. Planet 9 is Pluto, which actually passes through Neptune's orbit once in a long while.
TaiFerret no.
Pluto
is
not
a
*P L A N E T*
Pluto is still commonly referred to as "planet". It doesn't matter how scientists like to define words. They don't get to dictate language. They call it a "dwarf planet" which would actually make it a planet by the rules of the English language.
TaiFerret by the rules of the english language dwarf planet =\= planet
so pluto no planet.
bye
This video helped. Excellent pictorial. Thanks
Great video. Since we know nothing about planet nine, I wonder what the odds are of it being an interstellar black hole with 10 times the mass of the earth. That would be a cool simulation to see the affects of.
But a black hol radiates Hawkings radiations that we should be ably to measure, and x- rays.
the gravity doesnt lie, follow the kuiperbelt!
There already is a planet Nine it's called Pluto.
I've read some hypotheses that Planet 9 could be a small black hole but I am not aware that any evidence exists for this.
I live for "in other words."
1:14 Listen to yourself. Samuraizing? Planet Ninja?
Of course NASA knows it's real.
They took a picture of it in 2015.
And it's called *Pluto.*
Yeee
L T HORNING: 😱👍
That would mean theres hundreds of other planets too
Ceres, Haumea, Sedna, Eris, etc.
...Do you want your planet memorization in school to be that hard?
Black Hole yeah seriously and there's so many that aren't even named yet (shoutout to my boy 2007 OR₁₀) that'd be a pain in the ass to memorize for school
If you say pluto isnt a planet you have to fight me in irl. prepare yoursel
Simplest solution is that solar system rearranged recently and catastrophically.
Thank you for saying Uranus correctly.
Idea for an epic sci-fi thriller: We can't see planet 9 because from our vantage point it isn't moving, except in one direction...straight for Earth!
Keanu Reeves can play the hero, loosely based on me, of course.
Planet nine is my brother
Get him now
wait a second Planet 9 said he doesn't have a Brother!
A solar system planet is an exoplanet brother ? 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
English translation of Yingyang is alternator/motor. Alternator is the positive side motor is the negative side
"Planet Nine" DOES exist, and it already has a name.
It is called, "Pluto".
Not a planet
Planet nine is a dwarf planet. There may be four of them beyond Pluto. I know currently planetary scientist may claim more, but officially and eventually it may come down to four. This will give the solar system a total of 12 potentially inhabitable planets (4 rocky, 4 gas and 4 dwarf). But could not the inclinations of the planets be a result of the late heavy bombardment.
Maybe those 5 subjects of evidence could be caused by different planetary phenomena or movements. Oh, I just heard, ad you said five separate solutions.
Your video reports never fail to be informative and impressive! Thank you!
"NASA says its real!" Clickbait or they actually said it?
They actually did. They didn't confirm it's existence, but did say that it was highly likely.
Rahul Samal so its in a state on yes and no, like schroringers cat.
The two outer gass giants were predicted before they were actualy found. Could be the same situation, except that finding something at 800 AU is a hella lot more difficult.
Nah, you said that
According to latest Research Our Solar System rotates on a plane that is perpendicular (90°) to that of the Galaxy... However, it still orbits the Galaxy on same plane as all other bodies...
This research describes this motion of the Solar System as a Cork Screw effect while orbiting around the galaxy... This would cause a slight angle in Planetary Orbits around the Sun...
Is this where xur is at?
Don't even bother, he's selling the fighting lion.
King of Finesse fighting lion needs to be nerfed ^^
He better sell that gun i want
If it exists, we should be able to find it the same way we fine a lot of other extra-solar planets: “star wobble”. By carefully observing the movement of the sun, we should be able to determine exactly where to look, and just how much mass to look for.
I DONT WANT PLANET 9 I WANT PLUTO BACK AHHHH
It's still there, it being a dwarf planet doesn't stop it from being an object in space.
Calm down pluto is not destroyed
If we have seen hundreds of other solar systems you’d think we could have noticed a planet 1000x closer to us
If it hasn't been named yet, why hasn't 4chan claimed it as planet Kek?
It seems that the common 'Lay' person often confuses the size of a planet with its density. It could WELL be a very small - yet quite DENSE object that is quite influential - but too small to easily visually detect.
Could someone please explain to me why a super dense mass rotating inside the sun itself wouldn't accomplish the same effects as a planet 9? Thank you.
i really enjoy your channel, thank you.
So Theia could have been a moon in the orbit of planet 9?
EVEN IF IT IS REAL IT WON'T HIT EARTH!!!
Only if our luck changes.
How can they see to almost the edge of the universe, yet we need to rely on orbits of some object to guess if we have more planets?
We can only "see" what emit's or reflects light. The moon for instance does not emit light of it's own , it reflects light from the sun. So we can see it. Moving to the stars they are suns and emit light even from millions and millions of light years away. BUT we can "see" those star's planets by the periodic dimming of those stars light as the planets cross the line between us and those stars.If you are out late at night and there is a light down the road and the light dims for a second it would not be unreasonable to guess that something moved across the path of that light , like a deer or a person. We can also infer the existence of remote objects by the deviance of celestial bodies motions from the expected motions. Hope this makes sense coming from a non scientist like me. If anyone can explain this better please do so and I will delete this.
Could Planet 9 be the reason for near earth asteroids?
no but it may be why comets are continually stirred up from the ort cloud
For a moment in the beginning, I thought you sounded exactly like The Yamiks…
Anyway, good review of the currently known evidence. But that still doesn’t acknowledge if NASA or other institutions are onboard, or to what degree they think it is possible.
Planet 9 does exist. It is called Pluto... I'm sorry... I just grew up when planets were planets, and moons were moons.
Travis Ladegast Yeah to bad that the moon is bigger than pluto.
And the only reason why the moon is considered a "moon", is because it is a satellite of a planet. Ganymede, the largest moon in our solar system is bigger then Mercury. But we have not reclassified it... Just saying.
Well, Ceres, the largest planet in the asteroid belt, was considered a planet between 1801 and the 1850s, along with other asteroids, Juno, Pallas and Vesta. Pluto had not yet been discovered, and Neptune (the only planet discovered by mathematical prediction rather than direct observance--Planet Nine could be the second one) so textbooks back then may have said that we had ten planets.
By comparison, Pluto was officially classified as a planet for 75 years or so, so we're not tipping that much bigger of a sacred cow by re-classifying it.
If we were to classify Pluto as a planet, then our solar system today might be considered to have fourteen planets if you include the other dwarf planets (include Ceres, the only asteroid dwarf planet). Eris, discovered in 2005, has greater mass than Pluto and has only a slightly smaller diameter, Plus, there are at least six more objects that have been discovered that could end up being classified as dwarf planets, so if we count those as planets, that could bring us to twenty.
It just shows how fluid our classification of solar system objects are and as we learn more about them, these classifications might change again.
Personally, I think it would be amazing to see an earth(ish) sized moon orbiting around a Jupiter+ sized planet similar to the Avatar movie. I think that would throw our definition of planet into complete disarray. Unfortunately, I doubt I will every glimpse that in my lifetime.
I also would have no problem stating that we had 20+ planets in the solar system.
Travis Ladegast Yeah and i would totally like to call the sun a cow and the earth “planet c-farth568” just because”
But the facts are facts and we can’t discuss on them just because we like that way or the other.
And the fact that pluto like many other dwarf planets is not a planet it’s irrefutable.
Yeah many things were said between 1801 and 1850 but now we’re in 2017 and we are a much advanced society, i can’t believe that there is still people who disagree with science.
Whenever the article say maybe or probably, it means they are guessing
By you saying that planet nine is probably exists is scaring the heck out of me because conspiracy theories that says on October 16th planet nine would absorb earth.
if there would be anything that big near earth, you could see it with your blank eyes.
*naked eyes
Also, the chances of Planet 9 coming in that close are smaller than that of being hit by a falling satelite, being struck by lightning, being killed by a fire tornado, and winning the lottery all at the same time.
It's almost October 17 and the earth is still here.
its october 18th =)
Don't let this distract you from the solid fact that Red Lobsters Ultimate Feast price went up $4 and the portions got noticeably smaller. You only get 4 biscuits instead of 5 for a table of 2!!! Not fooling me!!
You made a random asteroid called "Nustasci" and in a system I have in US2 I have a gas giant called Nustasci. Cool
There is a ninth planet; it is called PLUTO!
Desert Punk75 It is a dwarf planet
The planet formally known as Pluto will eventually be reclassified as a planet again. Give it time, it changes every decade or so.
Dwarf PLANET
pluto is actually a DWARF planet
Dwarf planet :(
Great video Anton
Pluto isn't a planet.
it is its a dwarf planet
THE EARTH IS FLAT, SPACE IS SCIENCE FICTION
Are you saying dwarf people aren’t real people?
Mr.Dr.Professor Toaster lol roasted him
@@TheGdp the earth is a planet so it is not flat
I wonder if Pluto knows that millions of people on the other side of the solar system are pissed off on behalf of Pluto and fighting for Pluto to once again be named a planet? Wholesome
Anton, love your work,uneven if I have told you off in the past. 😁 Planet 9 has already been found, or perhaps it's planet "stellar core". Go to Planet X News YT channel and see for yourself. There is a huge "something" in close orbit of the sun on a 28 day, eccentric cycle. Please take a look and do a video. I'm sure that Scott, who runs the channel would welcome the help.
Funny how the Summarians knew about this planet thousands of years ago. Must have had really good Telescopes in those days.
Watch out for Plan Nine from Planet Nine coming to a cemetary near you. (Just couldn't resist it. Yeah, I know. I should have resisted.) ;-)
9:25 It ISN'T "Like" looking for a tiny tiny tiny dark spot in the sky from really really far away distance. ... IT IS looking for a tiny tiny tiny dark spot at a really really far away distance.
Always informative