Trying to speak in Kazakh with Kyrgyz | Is it hard to understand each other?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ค. 2024
- #kazakhstan #kyrgyzstan
I met kyrgyz sister nation in Bali by accident and invited her to the interview. In this interview we talked about similarities and differences of Kyrgyz and Kazakh nations. According to my experience talking to her in Kazakh and getting answers in Kyrgyz language I could understand her for almost 98%.
If you are interested in the full Kazakh-Kyrgyz language interview, I suggest you to check out our first video on my Kazakh channel:
• Қырғыз әпкемізбен қаза...
Interviewing TURKISH people in KAZAKH: • Trying to speak in Kaz...
How to support me and my channel:
Buy me a coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/balnurbaltk
Patreon: / balnurkz
Paypal: paypal.me/balnurkazakhstan
instagram - / balnurbaltabayeva
Telegram channel: t.me/hellokazakhstan
My second channel - / @livetrip7886
00:00 - Introduction
03:55 - Kyrgyz girl travelled to Turkiye
05:20 - Similarities between Turkish and Kyrgyz culture
07:25 - Similarities between Kyrgyz and Kazakh culture
15:07 - Kyrgyz girl travelled to Kazakhstan
16:39 - Is Russian Language lingua-franca in Kyrgyzstan?
17:50 - Is Kyrgyz nation less nomad that Kazakh nation?
21:05 - Do Foreigners know about Kyrgyzstan?
22:11 - Some foreigners know about Kazakhstan because of Borat
24:37 - Talking in Kazakh-Kyrgyz languages, can we understand each other?
00:00 - Introduction
03:55 - Kyrgyz girl travelled to Turkiye
05:20 - Similarities between Turkish and Kyrgyz culture
07:25 - Similarities between Kyrgyz and Kazakh culture
15:07 - Kyrgyz girl travelled to Kazakhstan
16:39 - Is Russian Language lingua-franca in Kyrgyzstan?
17:50 - Is Kyrgyz nation less nomad that Kazakh nation?
21:05 - Do Foreigners know about Kyrgyzstan?
22:11 - Some foreigners know about Kazakhstan because of Borat
24:37 - Talking in Kazakh-Kyrgyz languages, can we understand each other?
Love from Turkie❤
Sizi izlerken hem çok mutlu oluyorum hem de çok üzülüyorum. Mutlu oluyorum çünkü biz kardeşiz. Üzülüyorum çünkü birbirimizden ayrı düşmüşüz. Ama ne olursa olsun oralarda kardeşlerimiz olduğunu bilmek beni mutlu ediyor. Siz de her zaman Türkiye'de kardeşleriniz olduğunu ve sevildiğinizi bilin. Bir gün mutlaka çok daha yakın bağlar kuracağız kardeşlerim. Türkiye'den selam ve sevgiler.
Tebrizden selamlar ❤️🇦🇿🇹🇷❤️
Aynı duyguları paylaşıyoruz😥💔
I am Turkish but understand almost everything also,we are one family 🇹🇷🇰🇿🇰🇬🇹🇲🇦🇿🇺🇿❤
Great content! I am from Turkey and it is interesting I could understand Kyrgyz better than Kazakh even though Kyrgyzstan is further away from us geographically.
That's because the Aralo-Caspian Kypchak (a.k.a. Kypchak-Nogai) dialect continuum which includes Kazakh, Nogai, Karakalpak is phonetically innovative (possibly due to the Golden Horde era Mongolic influence), whereas both Turkish and Kyrgyz are phonetically and accent-wise are more archaic and conservative.
In Aralo-Caspian Kypchak, the Proto-Turkic word-initial Y and B sounds became the word-initial Zh and M sounds respectively, and the Proto-Turkic Ch and Sh sounds became Sh and S respectively.
@@ertuncdelikaya8237The Kazakh language is a pure Turkic language, there are no Mongolian words in the Kazakh language, and there are Kazakh words in the Mongolian language. Your Turkish language is poorly understood by Kazakhs, Kyrgyz and Karakalpaks. Because you are Turks by origin, not Turkic-Oghuz, such peoples as Persians, Arabs, Kurds, Greeks, Slavs took part in the ethnogenesis of the Turks.
@NaciDilekli you should visit here really, no offense , the food is so much better than yours , your food is just shxt , and people are much kinder to be honest
my mother, having worked in Turkey, said that the Turks use the Word to denote Dust while the Kyrgyz stopped using it. This word was spoken by her grandmother, when she heard this word she remembered that moments from her childhood
@@user-ve2xl8vn6qой бл да да да
Türkiye den Kazak ve Kırgız eline selam olsun.
It is so surprising that your Kyrgyz guest has never been to the US, because she speaks perfect idiomatic English with an American accent!
Turk balasi kurt olur
Bastigi yer yurt olur
Selam bolsun mete hanin torunlarina🧿🐺☪️
Ama kurt denmez, börü derler!
I'm always fascinated with Turkic language & central asian culture. Interesting channel. Keep it up!❤❤❤
Бир бирин түшүнгөнүнө таң калышатго😂, а мен булар таң калганына таң калып отурам.
айтпаңыз, аспаннан түскендей болып отыр)
Hepimiz Türk'üz ancak çok geniş bir coğrafyaya dağılmış ve çok eski bir milletiz. Bir uçtan bir uca gidildikçe aksan farkı artıyor. Tüm Türk ülkelerinde kendi bölgesel lehçelerimizin yanında ortak lehçe ortak şive de öğretilmeli. Almanlar o küçücük coğrafyalarında bunu yaptılar. Biz de yapmalıyız. Bir Kazak Türkü ile Bir Türkiye Türkü kusursuz anlaşabilmeli
Onlar ne yaptı.nasıl merak ettim.
@@asyasuuu Almanlar küçük bir coğrafyada yaşamalarına rağmen çok farklı lehçelere sahip. Kız çoçuğu için bile çoğu farklı kelime kullanıyor. Bir ilçeden 300km ötedeki bir köye gitseniz anlaşamazsınız. Bu yüzden okullarda ortak lehçe kullanarak bunu öğreniyorlar. Biraz İstanbul Türkçesi olayı gibi düşünebilirsiniz ama olay çok daha ilerisi. Bizde ki bir kelimenin Azerbaycan Türkçesinde farklı anlama gelmesi gibi. Bunu çözdüklerinde henüz merkezi birleşik bir almanya yoktu.Yani Kazak Kırgız Türkü kardeşlerimizle bu projeyi yapmak için tek deevlet olmaya ihtiyacımız yok
@@orkunagactan178 sözcüğü sözcüğüne doğru.Katılıyorum size ve keşke ortak lehçe olsa.Eskiden Çağatayca varmış.
@@asyasuuu Çağatayca yada proto Turkic ortak lehçe olabilir.
100% kelisemin / I agree with you
Interesting video. Of course I suspected about the similarities between our culture, traditions and cuisine with Kyrgyzstan, but I did not expect it to be so similar to Kazakhstan. Қазақ and Қырғыз are truly бір тұған! ✊
Hello, I'm from Peru, Latin America! This video is such a Marvelous thing, showcasing cultures, language, traditions, similarities and differences, etc. Moreover, this involves the two Great Nations. I'm currently interested in Central Asia and Middle East. Furthermore, my Profesor of Turkish Language is living in Kyrgyzstan now, so I'll investigating about that country! Would you be my Profesor Kazakh Language, Please? 🙏🏻👏🏻✨
Hi ladies, the pronunciation of numbers in Kyrgyz is the same as the pronunciation of Turkish, with a slight difference. We hope to see you in Antalya Turkey. Meanwhile, enjoy your visit to Bali.
Hello Ayjan, so nice to meet you. I am looking forward to learning about your country. I thought that after I retired at the end of 2021 I would study chess. I think God laughed and said, "Not chess, geography." Things happened in the world and now I know about many countries. TH-cam is so much better for learning about far away places. By the way I am proud to say I have never watched any Borat movie.
Kırgız numbers is %99 like in Turkish.
Согласен
I read somewhere that Ertugrul served the Yenisei Kyrgyz But it not shure of course
I really love those meetings between turkic people.
Watching Borat, even I was offended as a Turkish person. I went in expecting something about Kazakh culture but it was obvious they didn't speak Kazakh or shoot in Kazakhstan (I guessed it was Eastern Europe/Balkans, and turns out it was in Romania.) And other things were disrespectful. Sure, it's to make fun of ignorant Americans but they could have made up a fictional country imo instead of using a real country
He is British
@joebidet2050 yes but the main goal of the movie was to make fun of the Americans. He already made fun of the British with his tv-series
He is a moron. Has no acting skills nor humor. But he is an Ashknazi so he will make it. So did David Schwimmer. No talent.
Assalam Aleykum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh
Greetings from Maçaristan to my Sisters. 😇❤👍💐💐
We aren't arabs. No need to greet us in arabic
🇺🇿🇰🇿🇦🇿🇹🇷🇹🇲🇰🇬🇲🇳🇭🇺 ve Aleyküm Selam ve Rahmatullahi ve Berakatu. Greetings to our honorable Hungarian brothers and sisters. Şu bir hakikatir; dünyadaki 270 Million Türk'ün %90'dan fazlası Müslüman. Fakat biz Müslüman Türkleri başka dine sahib olan Türk kardeşlerimizi dışlamiyoruz ve dışlanmasınada karşıyız. Ayrıyetten arap kardeşlerimize yönelik ırkçılık yapılmasında karşıyız. Din ve ırk ayrımı yapanlar ya cahil yada başka kafalara hizmet eden hayinler. Siz tuzaklarınızı kurun ama bilinki Allah'ta size tuzak kuruyor. Allah tuzak kuranların en hayırlısı ❤
Buradan 2,2 Milliyar müslüman ve 270 Million Türk kardeşlerime selamlar. Yaşasın Göktürklerin, Cengizhanın, Oğuzhanların, Alperenlerin, Selçukluların, Osmanlıların torunları.
🇺🇿🇰🇿🇦🇿🇹🇷🇹🇲🇰🇬🇲🇳🇭🇺💪👍
Great Kyrgyz girls are smart and strong.
Thank you beautiful girls!👍🇰🇬🇰🇿👏
So amazing to watch!as a Kazakh speaker I proud of our similarities with Kyrgyz brothers and more Turkic brothers!
Love ♥️ 🇰🇿🇰🇬 from 🇮🇩
🇺🇿🇦🇿🇰🇿🇹🇷🇹🇲🇰🇬🇲🇳🇭🇺 𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰰
Selam to our brothers and sisters in 🇮🇩 Indonesia. We love you ❤
Thank you for sharing!
Hello from Bashkortostan❤
İ was actually in Bali in the end of February. Perhaps we even crossed paths there. 🤩
Wonderful video!
İ feel like Kazakh has a more "Mongol" sound to it. Just the sounds, not the words.
I'd be really interested in seeing a comparison with Sakha language too.
Love your videos your channel is so useful and educating keep up the good work .
Love from Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦 💚
Great video. Learnt some interesting info here. Looking forward to my next trip to both countries in May 🇰🇿 🇰🇬
Interesting. I will be visiting your countries in the near future and trying the ashlan fu.
Beautiful countries, beautiful languages, beautiful girls.
Very interesting ❤❤❤
Hi Balnur, nice video, thank you. I am a turkish girl who lives in Spain, If you ever come to Spain one day, I would like to meet you :)
We are planning go to Spain in Autumn , you can massage me @balnurbaltabayeva - my inst
Fascinating. Know Kazaks and Kyrgyz.
Başarılar dilerim, yolunuz ve bahtınız açık olsun.
Super !
Till 1936 kyrgyz and kazakh counted as one language called kyrgyz-kazakh. There can be found old grammar books for it.
No
Kazakh and kyrgyz never been same nation
@@kazakh170he wrote one language , not one nation. Also it has been one country, atleast according to the national museum in Almaty
@@Felixxxxxxxxx language also not same
Türk Birliğine, Turan'a ihtiyacımız var.
Ottoman empire was our last Turkic empire, it was the peak of empires. We need something close to that but better.
@@TehAbdullah Turkic Union?
great report, balnur
but i'm very surprised you have the photos of the javanese sultan from indonesia and his wife, in the wall background 😮
i'm javanese myself and i recognize my people's royalties
Pakubuwono X, Raja Surakarta Hadiningrat.
i like your videos
10:30 hahahha BASED girl she said everything i wanted to hear 🤣 a proof that kazakhs steal even food names
Заметил😅
🇰🇿❤️🇰🇬
Altyn Kyrgyz baurym♥!!
I like the picture of javanese King there..are you in bali ?
Bizim özenti Türkler bile İngilizce konuşurken Türkiye'yi "turkey" diye telâffuz ederken, Kazak kızın diğerini bu konuda uyarması çok güzeldi. Kendisini kutlamak lâzım.
Brothers ❤️
Hey Balnur, we can do a similar video about Turkmen language one day if you want :)
Hello, sure. Exactly now I’m looking for many turkic nations for videos. Can you direct me on Instagram: @balnurbaltabayeva
Nice information video love from Pakistan ❤️🇵🇰
🇺🇿🇦🇿🇰🇿🇹🇷🇹🇲🇰🇬🇲🇳🇭🇺 𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰰
Selam to our brothers and sisters in 🇵🇰 Pakistan. We love you too ❤
Is that correct if I said that Kazakhstani and Kyrgyz are more Mongol-looked, while Uzbeks, Turkmens and Tajiks are more Turkish/Persian-looked?
You are right
I dont know but both was beautiful..
❤❤❤❤
Would be funny if there was a Krim Tatar also vacationing there, and you guys chatted with her.
Kırım Tatar can understand them but they speak a mix of Kıpçak and Oğuz!
Boz mean also Grey in Turkish in Turkey
Hi evryone. I am uzbek and I can understand both language. Especially nubers are similar in uzbek language. Good luck!
Я вообще русский) просто знаю английский очень хорошо. Было очень интересно. Вы наверно так же как мы с Сербским или с Украинским языком. Очень похоже) Круто и интересно. Ката Рахмат! ( Научила Узбекская подруга )
Я бы даже сказал Русский с Белорусским. Потому что Украинский он не совсем похож ра русский по сравнению в белорусским. Поэтому Казахский и Кыргызский языки они ровно также близки и похожи как русский с белорусским.
@@virtualtravellingvideosне нихуя.Со славянскими не сравнить
@@virtualtravellingvideos Бред. Настоящий белорусский и украинский похожи. Дело в том, что беларусы не говорят на своем родном языке. Только подавляющее меньшинство.
This is very random but the Kyrgyz woman looks a lot like Native American in terms of her appearance. There is a theory that the Native Americans and Eskimos are originally migrate from Central Asia so they may technically be Turkic long lost distant cousin.
Oh My God, His Majesty Pakubuwana X from Surakarta Hadiningrat, Central Java, Indonesia
Love from Azerbaijan ❤️
❤
Here is a link to Turkish music from big part of the world!
th-cam.com/play/PLxIXD0B4yfWffmgPrrMa3MvrxH0H_Ihr8.html
Bir Tugan 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇺🇿🇰🇬🇹🇲🇰🇿
Both my parents grew up in China and both speak Kyrgyz and Uyguur
in the 1990's I noticed a lady selling smany things from Uzbekistan, I asked what is this in the bawl, she said ''kurt'', now in our Turkman dialect and in Türkiye ''kurt'' means either wolf or worm, then I said what is it made from, she said yogurt, o, I said thats ''kurut'', we also make it and take with us specially in journeys.. the word should be pronounced as Qurut, because of drying it, the verb is kurumak, kuruttu.. as for Kazak and Kyrgyz, similarities are more than differences, except unfortunately for the loan words which can be avoided, when we have the equivalent ..despite of being in Middle East for 1200 years yet we have managed to speak a Turkic language.. much close to Azerbaijani, then Turkman, Uzbek, Tatar and then Uigur, finally Kyrgyz and Kazak, face to face we manage to communicate
5:32 I also think central asians eat even more meat. Coming from the aegean part of Turkiye, we eat sooo many legumes and vegetables. Meat is kinda secondary tbh.
👍
Umarım bir gün tüm Türkistan'daki devletler Türk özlerini fark edip ona dönecekler ve birleşeceğiz. Sevgiler.
Бул Казак Менен Кыргыз кыздары кыйын болушат
Men özim Tatarmın, Qazaq äytilişi bizgä bek yaqın, lâkin Qırğızlarda kibik tilibizdä Ç/Ş/S häm C/J awazlarınıñ ayırması saqlanğan. Tilläribiz Qıpçaq türkiminä kirä häm köp yaqın özinçäliklär taba. Videoğız bek uşadı, keläçäktä ekigizgä dä oñışlar tiläp qalamın.
formation sanskrit language part2 The Sanskrit word canani, which means 'mother', is also derived from Farça ole (see picture for the right alphabet/symbol) canan (beloved). This word, on the other hand, was translated into Persian from the word Turkish can (Old Turkish bell). Considering that Persian was a literary language created from a mixture of old Turkish and Arabic in the palace of the Turkish Ghaznavids in the 11th century and 12th century, the fact that Sanskrit completed its formation after the 13th century, when the Muslim Turks began to rule India, emerges. ATA tata, a Sanskrit word meaning 'father', is a conversion from Turkish ata and Pelasg ärra átta. The Sanskrit word api bhratr, which means 'brother', is derived from the word ppárpa frátra, which means 'brother' in Sanskrit; The word bala has been transformed from the Turkish word bala which means 'child', and the word am gav which means 'cow' has been transformed from the Turkish word kuv (bulk, large, fat). , ko (Scandinavian).]. There are many words like these that have been converted from Turkish to Sanskrit. I give a small part of these conversions as an appendix at the end of this book. European linguists who argue that Sanskrit emerged in the 5th century BC, edited Sanskrit They claim that the person was Panini, an epic personality. However, the century in which Panini lived is uncertain. It is debatable whether he even lived. Although it is debatable whether Panini's "work" is dated between the 6th and 4th centuries BC. Although it is claimed that he wrote it in the period, there is no document proving this. The oldest Sanskrit script that exists today is from 1663, unearthed in Kashmir and written on birch bark.
It is an ancient manuscript. Thus, the existence of a person named Panini goes no further than epic. Prest PLEARS There is a great deal of falsification regarding the manuscript Panini from 1663 found in Kashmir. There is a grammar book written by a person whose period is unknown. However, there is no such ending. There is also no document proving that Panini is alive. The claim reads: "Since the nineteenth European scholars found and published Panini's work, Panini has been affirmed as the first linguist and father of linguistics." It is claimed that Panini wrote this book around 500 BC. However, there is no text or writing left from that period. There is only one manuscript dating from AD 1663. From this, it is understood that the oral hymn, which is claimed to be the epic person named Panini, was first written down in 1663. Hence, this written language is 17th century Sanskrit. Panini is an epic person like our Korkut Ata (Dede Korkut). Korkut Ata, in the ancient epics of the Oghuz Turks (page 31)
He is a wise person who was glorified and sanctified and a poet who is supposed to tell the ancient epics of the Turks. It is unclear whether he ever lived or not. There is no information about his life. The oldest source that mentions Korkut Ata is the ending Câmi el Tevârih of the Ilkhanid prime minister (vizier) Reşidüddin Fazullah Hamedani (1247 - 1318). The epic of Korkut Ata was written down several times by unknown authors in the 14th or 15th century. The name of the manuscript in Dresden is "Kitab-ı Dedem Korkud Ala Lisan-1 Täife-i Oğuzân", the name of the manuscript in the Vatican is "Hikayet-i Oğuznâme, Kazan Beğ ve Gayri". Now, if we say that Korkut Ata is the oldest linguist or the father of linguistics, we would be bogus. However, Mahmud of Kashgar is the oldest known linguist on earth and the true father of linguistics. Because he wrote the oldest known dictionary between 1072-1074. With extensive explanations and grammatical explanations. This dictionary named "Divan-1 Lugat el Türk" is Turkish-Arabic. European scientists engage in genealogy (racism). This is a fascist understanding of science. The so-called European linguists, who put forward the fabricated "Indo-European language" thesis, try to make a manuscript that is about four hundred years old look like it is thousands of years old in order to cover it up. Because, according to European linguists, Sanskrit "is a classical language spoken in South Asia from the Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-European languages, and originated by spreading from the north to South Asia in the late Bronze Age." The Late Bronze Age is the name given to the period between 1500 BC and 1200 BC. The north of India is Central Asia, the homeland of the Turks. In short, the dimensions of falsification are that wide. The hymn called segurft astadhyayi (eighth chapter), allegedly written by Panini, is the argued to be oldest surviving hymn Sanskrit grammar writings. However, there is no written document. There are hyms that have been handed down only orally from generation to generation, not a written document. Those who try to deceive them as if they are written documents are only committing fraud. There is also no documented script in Sanskrit. It is claimed to have been first written in various Brahmi scripts in the late 1st millennium AD, but there is no evidence or documentation. Sanskrit was written in the Devanagari script in the contemporary period. There is no written document remaining from this language, which is called "Vedic Sanskrit" and is claimed to cover the period between 1500 BC and 500 BC. The Vedas have been orally transmitted from generation to generation for centuries. The oldest written farewells found today are manuscripts written in the Devangari script of the early 19th century, called 'Rigveda' (Sanskrit: Rigvidy). However, European scholars argue that the Rigveda is the oldest known Sanskrit script. However, the Rigveda was also transmitted orally until the beginning of the 19th century. Devangari script, which is claimed to have emerged in the 7th century, is the script known today as Indian script. However, it is not known exactly when the Devangari script was formed. Duismeism (fraud) in the field of "written documents" does not end there, either. It is claimed that Kalidasa, who is said to be the greatest Sanskrit playwright, wrote in classical Sanskrit and laid the foundations of modern sang (arithmetic) in this language. However, it is not known in which age he lived, and there is no information about his life. The exact period of his "writing" is also unknown, but it is suggested that it was probably written before the 5th century AD. But again, there is no written document. There are only küğs (hymns). The two great Sanskrit epics, the Mahabarat and the Ramayana, are also a series of oral hymns. (Page 33)
European pseudo-linguists and inspired by Indian linguists refer to the local languages spoken in the Indian subcontinent from the 3rd century BC to the 8th century AD as Prakrit. He also defines Sanskrit as a standardized language used by ancient Indian khanates for literary, official and religious purposes. Prakrit is a word taken from Sanskrit. The Sanskrit word ri prakrit means 'rough', 'primitive', 'low', 'natural'. This word has been transformed into Sanskrit from the Old Turkic word birg, which means 'dirty', 'not pure', 'stool', 'dirt'. However, there is no written document between the 3rd century BC and the 8th century AD. Existing "Prakrit" manuscripts date from between 1300 AD and 1800 AD. It is assumed that these manuscripts were copied from earlier manuscripts. To make such a claim without any written documents dating from the 3rd century BC to the 8th century AD is unscientific and fraudulent. Linguistics cannot be built on assumptions, and anyone who tries to do so is at odds with science. The formation of Hindi and its dialects took quite a long time. The formation of Sanskrit, a divine language, took place in parallel with this. This formation process, which started with the influence of Turkish from Daravidian, then continued with the influence of Pelasg and finally completed its formation with the influence of Arabic and Persian. The first Muslim Turkish rule, the Delhi Sultanate, included present-day Northern India, Pakistan, Nepal, and Bangladesh. During the Delhi Sultanate, the Hindustani language, which was spoken as a lingua franca, emerged in Northern India, which consisted of these lands. Present-day Hindi, Nepali, Bengali, Urdu and other Indian languages are variants of the Hindustani language. These languages are close to each other and are generally mutually intelligible. page 34
Part 3 of Transformation/Reset Of Tatars To Indians.
Linguist Researcher Arif Cengiz Erman's book North Indian peoples origin.
Küzey Hint Toplukların Kökeni
Türkiye den Türkiye kazaklarından çok selamlar maşallah çok güzel vido olmuş emeginize Allah a emanet olunuz yaşasın Türkiye türk birligi kazakistan Kırgızistan Özbekistan Türkmenistan dogu. Türkistan yakutistan altay tataristan Kırım azerbaycan tüm türk dünyasına selam olsun Allah a emanet olunuz ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
🇰🇿💓🇹🇷🇦🇿💓🇹🇷🇭🇺💓🇹🇷🇺🇿💓🇹🇷🇹🇲💓🇹🇷🇰🇬💓🇹🇷
*I speak Kazakh
I speak Uzbek
I speak Russian
I speak English REMEMBER THE RULE PLS
i didn't understand about beshbarmak! Beshbarmak not Kyrgyz's national food but also Bashkir's and Kazakh's even they use 'besh' 😃
Тогда чей?
@@Cmu777 I said beshmark not only kyrgyz's traditional food but also bashkir's and kazakh's. Tatar people also have bishbarmak but they don't consider as traditional just authentic food like 'dolma', 'plov'.
Вот и ваше блюда долма!?
Не бишбармак" а Бешбармак"
Кыргызы, из древности готов ли бешбармак.
@@Cmu777 bishbarmak in Bashkort and Tatar language
@@Cmu777 translate properly
Türk kardeşlerme selam!
Balnur ou are still on thailand come and visit me on koh tao, I am Turkish Cypriot brother living here for many years (27). I can take yiy freediving and yiy can stay at my place (Baan talay koh tao ) hope to meet you soon 🙏🏻
Hello thank you for reaching me ) can you direct me on Instagram: balnurbaltabayeva. We arrived back to Kazakhstan but planning to travel to Thailand this winter 😊
🇹🇷🇰🇬🇰🇿🇸🇩🇺🇿🇹🇲🇦🇿♥️♥️♥️
Türkçe biliyorsun. Ger i İngilizce de yazacağım. Lütfen Orta Asya'daki Türk soyundan gelenler, şu Ruscayı unutun artık. Malasef hızlı konuşunca Kırgızcayı ve Kazakları anlamadım. Ama Bişkek ve Alma-Ata'da 6 ay kalsam anlamaya başlarım. Sayılar hemen hemen Türkçedekinin aynısı. Ama sözcükleri öğrenmek gerek. Dilbilgisi aynı. Duyduğum kadarı ile Kazaklar pek Türklerden hoşlanmıyorlarmış. Neden bilmiyorum. Tatar ve Azerbaycanlıları daha çok anlıyoruz. "You know Turkish spoken in Türkiye Balnur. Please start forgetting Russian. Unfortunately, both of you spoke very fast and I did not understand both of you. If I come and stay in Bishkek or Alma-Ata about 6 months, I will learn these languages. The numbers are very easy and same as in Turkish. Kırgız pronunciation is closer to Turkish. However, I need to learn the words. The gramercy is the same. I heard that Kazaks do not like Turks. I do not know why? We understand Azerbaycanis and Tatar more than Kazaks, Kırgız, and Ozbeks.
after listening to them count, while they sound almost the same.. it seems Kyrgyz might be easier to pronounce for an English speaker.
Banket 😊
Can a Kyrgyz understand a Kazakh when they speak English to each other?
It turned out they can.
photo di background nya Mirip Indonesia? 🤔
bizde surat yüz beniz deniyor hepsi türk dünyasından
Okay this video is not for vegans! 🙂 horses are like dogs for me but at least central Asia treats horses better than in many other countries where horses are considered to be pets.
борат же крутая комедия вы че !)))) балнур а вэа а ю фром?
I understand Turkish 😅
How about Uyghur language?
Renaicance part2) The word fortuna, which we have translated as "fortune" here and mentioned twice, actually corresponds to the old and noble meaning of the word "state", which is used only in terms such as "state bird" in Turkish today, and is equivalent to the concepts of "welfare", "happiness" and "blessing". Used twice with Fortuna, obbedienza, or obedience, gives the two keys to the success of the Turks, as well as the axis of similarity and continuity between the Roman and Turkish empires. However, the "state", which is a divine blessing, was achieved through the obedience of the Turks to their chiefs and the military discipline used as an equivalent.In his introduction to Annali Turcheschi, which was first published in 1571 and contains a chronological breakdown of Turkish history as an appendix to the Historia Universale, Sansovino further clarifies this issue:
I have always argued that the greatness and strength of the Turkish nation deserves great respect, because when looking at the army and civilian orders that have existed for a long time, it seems that they are not rude in their situation, but precious people. In terms of the army, I cannot see who of ours could be more disciplined than the Turks and closer to the Roman order. As the inheritors of the aforementioned Romans, they settle for little during the expedition, are very patient in hard work, obey their chiefs, follow the goals of conquest stubbornly, are masters of war tricks, and as a result carry out military affairs with such steadfastness that they do not give up any difficulty to win and dominate. As for the things of the peace order, they please their people with this form of absolute justice, by breaking all the tricks of the case that arise from the confused minds of the quarrelsome people and by quickly resolving the conflicts of others in their own interests. Therefore, a few years ago, I gathered what they had done in a fairly accurate book called The Universal History of the Origin and Empire of the Turks. My goal is for the world to learn the basis of their power by seeing and reading them, and therefore to find a cure to their unbridled chaos that advances like a steppe fire and will henceforth bring calamities to us and burn the last remnants of Christianity.
At the same time, in this text published in the third year of a new Ottoman-Venetian war, the year of the Battle of Inebahti, Sansovino could not be expected to be a "Turkish friend"; And what could "Turkish friendship" mean in 16th century Venice? Sansovino is a Renaissance intellectual who believes only in the necessity of a good and correct recognition of his adversary, but when this effort for recognition reaches a level of admiration, this admiration was expressed openly even during the days when two nations fought on a frontier from the Dalmatian coast to Cyprus. is not an obstacle. Likewise, the Venetian sledgehammer Marcantonio Barbaro, who would spend most of his time as an ambassador in Istanbul, was sent to the senate upon his return to his hometown after the Ottoman-Venetian peace in 1573, which left Cyprus and a significant part of the Dalmatian coast to the Turks. He concludes in his report:
Great prince and unique seers, since by God's will, the Ottoman emperor conquered so many provinces through constant victories, bound so many kingdoms to himself, and thus earned him a dreadful reputation all over the world, it would not be foolish to consider the possibility of his eventually reaching the universal kingdom. .
The second edition of Historia Universale is published in 1564 and the third edition in 1568. Now it has become a classic about Turks and its effects are beginning to be seen. The French philosopher Jean Bodin, who published his The Method of History in 1566, handles the same theme:
How can the ruler of Germany attempt to compete with the sultan of the Turks, and who can claim more absolute royal titles than this last? ... Indeed, if there is a power somewhere that can bear the name empire or a true absolute kingdom, that power is in the hands of the sultan ... It is best to consider the sultan of the Turks as the heir to the Roman Empire; Because, after capturing Byzantium, the capital of the empire, from the Christians, he conquered the Babylon region from the Persians and added the countries beyond the Danube to the Dniester river to the former provinces of Rome, and all these regions today constitute the largest part of the lands in his possession.
The aim of the French writer, whose hometown is far from the Turkish danger and whose main enemy is the German emperor, is more political. The main benefit of declaring the Ottoman sultan as the heir of Rome, who had been the ally of France against Germany for thirty years, was to withhold that title, which was the basis of his power, from the German emperor. However, this behavior of the author is proof that the Ottoman state has been a part of European policy ever since.
Taking advantage of the Ottoman-Venetian peace in 1573, Sansovino Historia Universale published the fourth edition and the second edition of Annali Turcheschi.
The seventh and final edition is published more than half a century later in 1654, in the midst of a new and long Ottoman-Venetian war. Its volume is divided into two, as it can no longer fit in a single volume. The first volume consists of 471 pages, the second consists of 522 pages, and this is added Annali Turcheschi, or Ottoman history, brought to the end of the reign of Sultan Ibrahim (1648).
The 25-year Ottoman-Venetian war, which resulted in the conquest of Crete, will also end the comparison of Romans-Turks developed by Renaissance thinkers and spread by Sansovino. Venetian sledgehammers, who came to Istanbul after the peace signed in 1669, will persistently embroider the motif of "Eastern despotism" and this theme will quickly spread across Europe. The reasons for this change of view are complex: On the one hand, the development of the concept of freedom in Europe with the Enlightenment, and on the other hand, the distance between the Ottoman Empire and the deterioration of the order gradually widened. However, at the same time, to the extent that the Ottoman state, which fascinated Renaissance intellectuals with its power, lost its power, the admiration of the West turned into disdain and even hatred.
As a result, Renaissance intellectuals trying to get rid of religious schemes did not only look at Turks in terms of Christianity and Islam. Going back to our example, "The Life of Muhammad", which forms the introduction to the first edition of Sansovino's Historia Universale, is omitted in the third edition, after being re-added in the fourth edition, it disappears in the next editions. Thus, instead of marginalizing the Turks within the framework of an insurmountable opposition, the way of examining them by introducing them into the historical and ideological patterns of the West was preferred. Therefore, the Roman model, which represents absolutism together with military and administrative power, was easily adapted to the Ottoman state. Geopolitics also played an important role in this, because the Ottoman was the product of the same geography, especially the East Roman Empire.
However, by doing this, the West reaches the point of renouncing the Roman heritage, which it regards as the origin of its culture and history, especially in the Renaissance period, and risks losing this legacy to the most important adversary of the period, the Turks. In the Enlightenment period, starting from the second half of the 17th century, when the state and power model based on military and purely political power, whose most important representative was Machiavelli, gradually began to give place to the concepts of freedom and human rights, the concept expressing the Ottoman order was admired. He left the Roman "as a force, to the Eastern despotism, which would be presented as a counter-model by thinkers like Montesquieu."
As can be seen, what has happened since that day is not that the "West" "recognizes" Turks or "fails to recognize them", but its interpretation according to the models it has produced.
As for the Turks, before their time of Westernization, they could have remained unaware or at least indifferent to these debates and comments. However, since the process of Westernization starting from Tanzimat until today expresses the integration with the Western way of thinking in the final analysis, it also brings the necessity of adapting to the way the West perceives Turks.
Prof. Dr. Stefanos Yerasimos
Social History Journal, Issue 118, October 2003
Notes:
1 “Chronica per extensum descripta”, published by E. Pastorello Rerum italicarum scriptores, Bologna, 1932, c. XII.
2 Andanças e viajes de Pero Tafur por diversas partes del mundo avidos, Madrid, 1874, p. 168.
3 History of Mehmed the Conqueror by Kritovoulos, trans. Charles T. Riggs, Princeton, 1934, p. 181-182.
4 The manuscript was purchased by the French ambassador Girardin in 1687 and is today in the French National Library; see. Julian Raby, "Mehmed the Conqueror's Greek Scriptorium", Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 37/1983, p. 20-21.
5 La Cronica dell'anno 1400 all'anno 1500, Florence, 1984, p. 127-128.
6 Discorsi sulla prima Deca di Tito Livio, first edition 1531. The quote is from the French edition (La Pl’iade, 1974, p. 511).
7 Eugenio Alberi, Le relazioni degli ambasciatori veneti al Senate durante il secolo decimosesto, III. serial, Florence, 1840, c. 1 second
1-22
U ladies look like korean super models get korean citizenship and do the miss universe contest and represent korea both of you hands down will win love the strong Russian accent
Wow, thanks dear 😊
40 kız
🇦🇿💓🤝
Central Asians must change countries name. Qazaqeli and Kyrgyzeli is better. Also Borat filmed at Gypsy village in Romania. Wearing national flag like underwear is also no go in Türkiye, it's very disrespectful. You can get cancelled or death threats for doing that. Also Kyrgyz numbers are more similar to Turkish.
etruscans romans part 3) Roman Empire.
Caesar's heir Octavian and Lieutenant Mark Antoni defeated Caesar's assassins Brutus and Cassius in 42 BC. Then they fell for each other. Mark Antoni and his allies Cleopatra were defeated at the Battle of Actium in 31 BC. In 27 BC, Octavian formally sought to relinquish all his powers to the Roman senate. Octavian's proposal to withdraw from the consulship caused riots among the plebs in Rome. Because the plebs loved Octavian. The senators, most of whom were Octavian's own supporters, rejected Octavian's proposal to withdraw from the consulship, for the sake of the Roman Republic and its people. A treaty known as the "First Compromise" was reached between the Senate and Octavian, and the Senate named Octavian Augustus. This treaty legitimized Augustus as a people's autocrat and assured him that he would not be seen as a Tyrant. Thus, the Republic disappeared. The first two centuries of the empire experienced an unprecedented period of stability and prosperity known as the "Pax Romana" (Roman Peace). Rome reached its greatest territorial extent during the Trajan period (AD 98-117). With the administration of Commodus, increasing problems and a period of decline began. (177-192). When the Roman provinces were briefly separated in the 3rd century under the names of the Gallic Empire and the Palmyrene Empire, the empire suffered a crisis that threatened its very existence. Under Aurelian, the empire was reunited (270-275). Major attacks by the Sak (ScythianTurk) Khaganate and then the (Turk) Kun Khanate led to the decline of the Western Roman Empire. Emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four regions, each with a separate emperor. The empire was reorganized by Constantine the Great, the first Christian emperor, who established Constantinople as the new capital of the Eastern Empire. page 66
During the Constantine and Valentinian dynasties, the empire was divided into East and West, between the two power centers in Constantinople and Rome. Theodosius I, the last emperor to rule over both the East and the West, died in AD 395 after making Christianity the official religion of the empire. The Western Roman Empire began to disintegrate in the early 5th century, as Turkish migrations and invasions exceeded the empire's capacity to absorb immigrants and fight off invaders. In 476, Odoacer ended the Western Empire by giving imperial authority to the Eastern Emperor Zeno, rather than calling himself emperor. Constantinople, the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire, which was later called the Byzantine Empire by historians, II. It was conquered by Mehmet (Fatih Sultan Mehmet) and II. Mehmet declared himself the Kayser-i Rum (Roman Emperor).
Kazakh language and Karakalpak language in Uzbekistan. I am sure you will understand Karakalpak even more, than Kyrgyz.
from facebookgroup Origins Of The Russians. And Their (Turkish Roots) Real History (ORIGIN OF SLAVES part 1)
Arif Cengiz Erman
The word Slav was used to describe the Northern European slaves. Today it is used to mean 'slave' in all European languages. However, the real meaning of this word is 'selling slave'. It is a name given to this ring of northern Europeans engaged in the slave trade.
The word 'Slavic' comes from the Western Roman language Sclavus called "Latin" and the Eastern Roman language Sklabos called "Ancient Greek". This word, which emerged in the Roman language in the 6th century during the medieval Latin period, was also referred to as Sakaliba in Arabic.
The Turks living in the Black Sea steppes and dealing with the slave trade were called Sclavus/Sklabos by the Romans. Because these lands are the former lands of Saklar (Scythians) and other ethnic Turks.
As it can be understood, the word Sclavus/Sklabus has been transformed from the word from Saka/Saklar (Sakalar/Scythians) are an ancient Turkish people and their place of residence is today's Russia and Ukraine. The Slavs are a people who emerged in these lands in the 6th century and are the successors of the Turks.
However, the Slavic ethno emerged from the mixture of Turks and Ugors. The Slavic language is basically a mixture of the Turkish language and the Ugor language. There was also interaction from Latin to this language, and with the spread of this people, who were the last to form in Europe, to Eastern Europe and the Balkans, different Slavic languages emerged.
In fact, Saklar (Sakas-Scythians) had already migrated from the Black Sea steppes at that time. The Saks, who displaced the Cimmerians in the Black Sea steppes, came from the east, as Herodotus wrote, and are the successors of the early Turkic cultures of Oxus, Andronovo, and Afanesyevo in Central Asia. The area of the Sak Empire is the region in the east of Europe, the Crimea and the Black Sea Steppes, and the region in Central Asia, including the Tien Shan Mountains and the Fergana Valley.
In this wide geography, BC. 8th century BC The names Skythai in Byzantine sources, Ashguzai in Assyrian sources, and Sa in Chinese sources were used for Saklar, who established a powerful empire between the 3rd century BC. After the Sarmatians, the successors of the Cimmerians, defeated the Saks and recaptured the Black Sea steppes, the Sak Empire was dissolved.
According to Herodotus, who lived in the 5th century BC, the Cimmerians were a people who lived in the north of the Caucasus and the Black Sea in the 8th century BC, that is, in today's Ukraine and Russia. Assyrian records show that the Cimmerian country extended to the Caucasus.
According to the history of Herodotus, the Cimmerians were expelled from the Black Sea steppes by the Saklar (Scythians). The Cimmerians, who remained in the Black Sea steppes, called themselves Saruma (Sarmat) after the 3rd century BC.
According to Herodotus, the Cimmerians are close relatives of the Thracians (Turks/) and while these two peoples lived in the north of the Black Sea, they were displaced by invaders from the east in the 8th century BC. In fact, a single people, the Cimmerians/Thracs, have lived since ancient times in a wide area stretching from the İdil River to the north of the Black Sea and the Balkans.
After the Sak (Scythian) invasion in the 8th century BC, a large part of the Cimmerians spread to Eastern Europe and began to be called Thracian. Cimmerian/Thracian civilization Bug-Dniester (5000 BC), Samara (4000 BC), Kvalynsk (4000 BC), Sredny Stog (4000 BC), Dnieper-Donets (4000 BC), Usatovo (3000 BC), Maikop-Dereivka (4000 BC) It is the successor of early Turkic cultures such as 3000 BC and Yamna (3000 BC).
European historians claim that the Sarmatians, who replaced the Saks in the Black Sea steppes, were also a people of "Indo-European" origin and spoke an Iranian language. However, there is no document to prove these claims. The Sarmatians are the successors of the Cimmerians. The Cimmerians, who lived under the rule of Sak for about 500 years, rebelled against the Saks in the 3rd century BC and dominated the Black Sea steppes again.
In the 3rd century AD, after the collapse of the Asian Hun Empire, the Sarmatians united with the Asian Huns, a small part of which migrated here, and ended the Gothic invasion and established the European Hun Empire. Some of the Sak tribes, who did not retreat to Central Asia after being defeated by the Sarmatians, were Alans and later settled in the Caucasus.
The Roman Historian Tacitus (56-117) refers to the Huns in Europe as the Hunnoi. He states that in 91 BC the Huns lived between the north of the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea. The Alexandrian geographer and historian Ptolemy (90-168) also says that the Huns, whom he called Chunnoi, lived in the Roxolani (today's south of Romania) and the region from the north of the Black Sea to the Caucasus.
As it can be understood, although the Saklar had already left the region, their names lived on and the Turks living in the region were also called Saklar by the Romans. The emergence of the Slavs as an ethnos coincides with the Avars period.
A small part of the Avars, the successors of the Asian Huns who migrated to the Black Sea steppes after being defeated by the Yiwu ("Gökturks") in Central Asia, united with the Yiwu tribes here in 562, and Bayan Han was the front line.
A small part of the Avars, the successors of the Asian Huns who migrated to the Black Sea steppes after being defeated by the Yigits ("Gökturks") in Central Asia, united with the Yiwu tribes here in 562, under the leadership of Bayan Han, in the region from Central Europe to Idil, from the Balkans to the Baltic. They founded the European Avar Empire (558-805).
Slavs, consisting of a mixture of Turkish and Ugor tribes, actively appeared on the stage of history during the Avars period. During this period, they spread to eastern Europe and the Balkans and established their first political organization. Changes in their ethnic structure also emerged in this period.
🇺🇿🇦🇿🇰🇿🇹🇷🇹🇲🇰🇬🇲🇳🇭🇺 𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰰
Selam. Emeğine sağlık Bu bir gerçek. Bunu "slavların" kendi tarihlerini araştırdıklârı yerlerde yolla, okusunlar bilmeyenler öğrensinler.
@@user-ws1tz4zu3l Maalesef bir tane slavı bile ikna edemedim. Hristiyanlık ve komünizm ile beyin yıkama öylesine kemiklerine işlemişler ki imkanı yok araya giremiyorsun. hint avrupa tezi nin bilimsel hiç bir dayanağı yok desem de gruplar formlar açsam avrupalı biri 'The making of Slavs' yani Türklerden resmen slav türetilmesi diye bedava googdan indirilebilecek bir kıtap yazmış acın bakın diye suratlarına vuruyorum.. adam hala osmanlı da takılıp kalıyor.. türk sünüz türk düşmanı olarak yetiştiriyorlar sizleri desem de acınacak hallerine benimle dalga gecmeyi gülmeyi yeğliyorlar..
part2) Origins Of The Slavs And Their (Turkish Roots) Real History (facebookgroup) origin of slavs For example, Eastern Slavs (Russians, Ukrainians and White Russians) completed their ethnic transformation in the 9th century as a result of the Swedish Vikings, Varyags, who settled in the region and mixed with the Salvs. The Varyags are descendants of European Hun commanders who founded the first kingdoms in Scandinavia.
Starting from the second half of the 9th century, the Russians, by capturing the great trade route going down to the Black Sea via the Ozi (Dnieper) River, put an end to the Caspian domination in this region and gathered the scattered Slavic tribes and established the Russian state.
The Eastern and Southern Claims, on the other hand, emerged with the mixing of Turkish tribes such as Avars, Bulgars, Pechenegs, Kipchaks with the first Slavs. In 803-804, the Bulgarian Kağan Kurum captured all the Avar lands in the Danube region, and after this date, some of the Avars mixed with the Hungarians and some of them formed the Croatian people by mixing with the Slavs.
In 632, Kubrat Khan established the Bulgarian Khaganate. After Kubrat Khan's death in 665, as a result of the pressure of the Khazars, the Great Bulgarian Khanate was destroyed in 681 and the Bulgarians were divided. Batbayan, the eldest son of Kubrat, joined the Khazars, the same people as the Bulgarians, and a large part of the people migrated to the north and founded the Idil Bulgars State. The part settled in the southwest under the rule of Kubrat's younger son Asparuh, on the other hand, founded the Danube Bulgarian State in 678 and laid the foundation of today's Bulgaria.
The Pechenegs, an Oghuz tribe, moved from the north of the Black Sea to the west in the 10th century and became an important power in the north of the Black Sea and the Balkans until the end of the 11th century. In 915, they were organized as khanates for about 150 years (916-1065) in the Ozi-Kubat region. As a result of the Byzantine agreement with the Cumans who had come to the Balkans, the Pechenegs, who fought with the Cumans on the coast of Maritsa, suffered a heavy defeat.
After this event, some of the Pechenegs settled in Anatolia against the Seljuks at the request of the Byzantine State. Another part of the Pechenegs retreated to Hungary and mixed with the Hungarians, some of them settled in the Balkans and continued their existence for a while, and then mixed with the Slavs and formed the Bosnian people.
The first Bosnian principality was established in 1250 under Hungary and became an independent kingdom in 1377. This kingdom later became a kingdom including Croats and Serbs, and came under Ottoman rule in 1463. The history of the Serbs, who emerged as an ethnic identity with the establishment of the Serbian Church in 1219, is intertwined with Bosnians and Croats.
The Khazar State, which was the direct successor of the European Hun Khaganate and continued its existence between the years 469-1048, formed the western branch of the khanate during the Turkish Khaganate, and became a khanate on its own after the disintegration of the Turkish Khaganate.
The Khazar Khaganate is an Oghuz/Turkmen Khaganate. There has never been a Turkish tribe called "Caspian" in history. In summary, the lands of the Khazar Khaganate are the historical lands of the Turkmens. At that time, the most populous Turkish tribe was the Oghuzs. It is so today. Oghuzs are Turks; they called themselves Turk or Turkmen (who is Turkish).
According to Mahmud of Kashgar, Turkmens are actually twenty-four tribes, twenty-two of them call themselves Oghuz, and the other two tribes are Kipchaks and Halachs. The Kipchaks (aka Cumans), who came to the scene of history in the 11th century, are the Turkmens who stayed in the Black Sea steppes after the Oghuzs left the region.
The Black Sea steppes, formerly known as the Oghuz steppes, later became known as the Kipchak steppes, and the Kipchaks were a decisive force in the Black Sea steppes until the end of the 13th century. This existence of the Kipchaks continued until the Balkans after a series of victories against the Russian principalities in the 11th century.
A part of the Kipchak branch, which migrated to the Balkans, later accepted Christianity and became the Gagauz; some of them formed Croats and Serbs by mixing with Avars and Slavs. Some of them joined the Hungarians.
Some of the Kipchaks who remained in the Black Sea steppes became one of the ancestors of peoples such as Kazakhs, Tatars and Bulgarians by mixing with other Turkish tribes in the following centuries. The Kozaks (Ukrainians), who are today's Slavic Cossacks, are the direct descendants of the Kipchaks who remained in the Black Sea steppes.
Source:
Erman, Arif Cengiz. The Real History of the Turks / Theses on Turkish Language and History. Urzeni Publications. 2019
Erman, Arif Cengiz. The Origin Dictionary of the Turkish Language. Urzeni Publications. 2019
Slavların Kökeni, İNUSAM'da yayımlandı. Dünle yazı yazmak kısaydı. Altta daha geniş olanını.
SLAVLARIN KÖKENİ
Arif Cengiz Erman
central asians have high defined cheek bones
akıllısın, bi kere japonsun
Transformation Of The Etruscan/Turks inTo Romans from facebook group etruscan and their turkish origin
Etruscan Civilization. part 1)
Turkish-Turanian tribe that came to Europe from Central Asia with the great migration thousands of years ago settled in Italy over time and established civilizations such as Etruscan, Rae, Ligur, Lepon, Umbri, Oscan, and Venete. Etruscans, one of these civilizations, created a brilliant culture and over time dominated the entire Italian peninsula. European historians today make various claims about the origin of the Etruscans. There are those who claim that they are a branch of the Latins, that they are of Anatolian origin, that they came to Italy around 1600 BC or 700 BC. There are also arguments that the Etruscans are the native people of Italy, that they are relatives of the Lydians, that they are a branch of the Pelasgians who migrated to Italy. All of these claims are speculation. The Etruscans are a Thracian (Yüyik) branch that settled in Italy in the 2nd millennium BC. The number of Etruscan words whose meanings are known today is quite limited, and about 700 of these words that I have identified match Turkish in terms of meaning and phonetics. I explained these Etruscan words, which match with Turkish, in my book The True History of the Turks. Introduction to Turan History/Arif Cengiz Erman page 57
Etruscans called themselves Turan in ethnic sense, and their own people and other peoples as Rashana in the sense of community. Turan means power, command, independence, sovereignty, administration and state in Etruscan and means 'emerging/'. The word Rashana, which means Etruscan people, means 'living'. The word turuk or turk in Etruscan means given, dedicated, great and superior. In this respect, the Etruscans, besides calling themselves Turan, also called themselves Turuk or Turk. The Etruscans were at a much more advanced level of civilization than the other Turanian peoples in Italy. From religion to art, from law to architecture, it is now proven that Roman Civilization is completely rooted in Etruscan civilization. After all, the Roman Civilization is the continuation of the Etruscan Civilization. Those who used the first architectural techniques in Europe such as domes and arches, who did urban planning, who settled the bath culture, who were engaged in iron, bronze, gold and silver craftsmanship, were the Etruscans who brought this culture from Central Asia. This people also introduced horses and chariots to Europe, practiced an advanced agriculture, made inventions such as the calendar, alphabet and sexagesimal number system, and deeply influenced Europe with its language and culture. For example, numbers known as "Roman numerals" are actually Etruscan numbers, and the alphabet known as "Latin alphabet" is actually Etruscan alphabet. The Etruscans brought this alphabet from the Eurasian steppes. Even the famous "Roman Law" derives from the Etruscan Tengrism religion, in which rituals occupied an important place. Therefore, the Roman civilization is the continuation of the Etruscan Civilization. Legend has it that there was a period between 600 BC and 500 BC when an alliance was formed between twelve Etruscan settlements known today as the Etruscan League, the Etruscan Federation, or "Dodecapolis". page 58 The Etruscan union of the twelve cities is founded by Tarchon and his brother Tyrrhenus. The name of the city of Tarchna or Tarquinnii, as it is known, comes from Tarchon. The name Tyrrhenus is another name for the Etruscans, the Turanians. Although there is no consensus among European historians about which cities were together, it is claimed that the cities of Arretium, Caisra, Clevsin, Curtun, Perusna, Pupluna, Veii, Tarchna, Vetluna, Volterra, Velzna and Velch were together. However, for some reason, Rome, which has always been the central city of the Etruscans, is not shown in this unity. The reason for this is the effort to show the Etruscans as a separate people from the Romans. The Etruscan union was mostly an economic and religious union or a loose confederation. The twelve city-states met once a year and chose one to represent the union. Apart from this, there were two other Etruscan troops. These were Campania, with the central city of Capua, and the Po Plain city-states in northern Italy, which included Bologna, Spina, and Adria. After the Welsh invasion in the 4th century BC, the Etruscans lost their influence on the Po Plain and the Adriatic coast. However, the later Etruscan expansion was both northward beyond the Apennine Mountains and into Campania. Some small cities in the 6th century BC disappeared during this time, and were taken over by larger, more powerful Etruscan city-states. The mining and trade of metal, especially copper and iron, led to the enrichment of the Etruscans and the expansion of their influence in the Italian peninsula and the western Mediterranean. At this point, his interests began to clash with the Pelasgians. This led the Etruscans to ally with Carthage, whose interests also conflicted with the Pelasgians. Around 540 BC, the Battle of Alalia caused a new distribution of power in the western Mediterranean. page 59 Despite the war having no clear winner, Carthage managed to expand its influence at the expense of the Pelasgians, and the Etruscans took control of Corsica and the northern Tyrrhenian Sea. After losing the southern provinces from the first half of the 5th century BC, the power of the Etruscans began to wane. In 480 BC, the Etruscan allies were defeated by a contingent led by Carthage, Syracuse, and Sicily. A few years later, in 474 BC, Hiero, the leader of Syracuse, defeated the Etruscans in Cumae Campania. The influence of the Etruscans on Lazio and ........ weakened.
Roman Kingdom.
Ancient historians date 753 BC as the beginning of the Roman Kingdom. While the Etruscans united the "Latin" villages they had dominated and founded the city of Rome, they forced the local "Latin people" to work in the establishment of the city. This situation created a gap between the two communities. (translator İlyas Şimşek's note: It's Remarkable that he does not talk about the elite Rich Jews who had power to appoint A Ceasar and when they infiltrated ) _____________________________ In the book, I specifically wrote the word "kral(king)" as "(kiral)king". This word has passed into Turkish from the Hungarian word "király". Therefore, it should be used as "Kıral" in Turkish as well. page 60
The Latins revolted, expelled the Etruscan king and established the Roman Republic. Thus, the "Latins" overthrew the Roman Kingship of the Etruscans and replaced it with a government headed by two consuls elected annually by the people and advised by a senate, and entered the republican era established by the "Latins". But this history has nothing to do with reality. It is nothing but an attempt by European historians to write a Roman history. It was entirely fabricated by European historians. Because there is no proper historical record. Little is known about the history of the Roman Kingship, because the few records describing the time of the Chirality date from the Republican and Imperial periods, and their accuracy is highly questionable. According to these legends, the Roman Kingdom began with the establishment of the city around 753 BC, with settlements around the Palatine Hill along the Tiber River in central Italy. The period of hiring ends with the founding of the republic around 509 BC. According to the information obtained from Roman history, especially from Livy (64 BC - 12 AD), Dionysius of Halicarnassus (60 BC - 7 AD) and Plutarch (46-120), it is told that seven kings ruled Rome in succession in the first centuries. When the Gauls captured the city after the Battle of Allia in 390 BC, they destroyed most of the historical records of Rome. In this respect, all of the records claimed to have survived to the present day should be carefully questioned. Also, these ancient writers never mentioned a people called "Latin". Except for Romulus, the legendary founder of the city of Rome during the Etruscan Kingdom, all kings were chosen by the Roman people for lifelong service, and no chiral could rely on military force to gain or maintain the throne. insignia of Etruscan Roman chirals; twelve "lictors" with ax fascias, "right to sit on Curule (throne), purple "Toga Picta" (ornate cape), red shoes, and white diadem (crown) around the head. Among all these insignia, the most important was the purple cape, because it was a symbol of nobility.
Астана очень странный город вроде к Европе тянутся, а на самом деле Азия
Лепежка-май токоч