Greatly thanks for uploading. I find the lecture very interesting and very evocative. I have some objections to Dr.Khurana. I think Russian Formalism has few things to do with New Criticism. The more important origin of New Criticism was from William Empson, his book ''Seven Types of Ambiguity'' (1930). Technical terms of Cleanth Brookes ,including 'paradox','tension', originated form the book, I think. The lecturer should have mentioned Empson ( or his master Ivor Richards) instead of Russian Formalists.
Honestly , these literary theories are not that difficult..All we need is an excellent student friendly professor but you made it so complex by only quoting that too unnecessarily..
![แขกคนแรกร้านแจ๊ส [ซี - เอมมี่] | iJazzKhunJang](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XP6C9kulFfc/mqdefault.jpg)
![[UNCUT] ที่นี่ที่แรก ปู - หาญส์ พูดถึงมหากาพย์หนี้สิ้น I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 10 ก.ค.67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KDNA9DZ0p4U/mqdefault.jpg)
Great lecture 👌
Esp. the definition of 'literariness' that distinguishes the Russian formalist approach from former methods of viewing literature.
But good lecture.... Keep uploading topics which is important frm net point of view
Thank you Ma'am for the video.
Superb one. ♥️
Well explained
Thanks ma'am 🥰
🙏💕🌹
Worthless lecture
Why?
Greatly thanks for uploading. I find the lecture very interesting and very evocative. I have some objections to Dr.Khurana.
I think Russian Formalism has few things to do with New Criticism. The more important origin of New Criticism was
from William Empson, his book ''Seven Types of Ambiguity'' (1930). Technical terms of Cleanth Brookes ,including
'paradox','tension', originated form the book, I think. The lecturer should have mentioned Empson ( or his master Ivor
Richards) instead of Russian Formalists.
Thank you so much! That was informative.
She just keeps on reading the slides. She could have explained!
you should understand that the slides are based on her content and not the other way around.
thank you very very very much!
Thank u maam.... its really very helpful
Thanks u mam formalism Introduction
Great job
carry on!
but deir no explaination about anythg ???
Honestly , these literary theories are not that difficult..All we need is an excellent student friendly professor but you made it so complex by only quoting that too unnecessarily..
I honestly didn't like the way she taught in this lecture. Could've been better.
his last name is Brooks not BrookEs
حجه
She seems to know nothing about the topic. Shameful for a professor!
How much you know, please explain this topic in your words.