Thank you for this informative presentation. I'll admit that I paused the video and took notes from the presentation itself, but it was very informative nonetheless. I finally understand some concepts that my Professor failed to explain properly in class. Thank you!
Derrida's deconstruction of language appears to be his interpretation of the conditioning power of language. There may not be any rational connection between the word and its meaning, but the connection is deeply conditioned in our psyche.
syntagmatic is cleared but the pardigmatic is not...provide 2-3 examples to make the viewers understand...instead of just reading the notes ma'am please elaborate it to make us more clear...THANK YOU
When you simply read, so many errors. Casual for 'causal'. Mechanical reading without understanding, so no correction of text too? French 'critique', instead of French CRITIC Jacques Derrida
Thank you for this informative presentation. I'll admit that I paused the video and took notes from the presentation itself, but it was very informative nonetheless. I finally understand some concepts that my Professor failed to explain properly in class. Thank you!
This presentation takes complex ideas and presents them in a very clear manner.
Thank you sir for this informative presentation.
Superb. If I only could figure out how to get cognitive linguists to pay attention...
Derrida's deconstruction of language appears to be his interpretation of the conditioning power of language. There may not be any rational connection between the word and its meaning, but the connection is deeply conditioned in our psyche.
explaining should be here along with reading
You should have provided us a pdf file rather toiling so hard in making this video.
Your accent and explanation are awesome
Is it teaching or reading competition?
Can you please explain things rather than just reading them?
we want more such videos of sociology thank you
Explanation should be more simple. It is just a reading.
good video
syntagmatic is cleared but the pardigmatic is not...provide 2-3 examples to make the viewers understand...instead of just reading the notes ma'am please elaborate it to make us more clear...THANK YOU
Ma'm padh tou hum khud bhi saktay hn aph plz explain kijiye
I have to make this speed as you respected maam
check out, Bock Saga - 8 Powers, Part 1 (by Jim Chesnar) origins of words.
nice
lack of cohesion
i could've read that too,
What is linguistics theory?
🤦🏻♂️ pdh to khud bhi skte the
When you simply read, so many errors.
Casual for 'causal'.
Mechanical reading without understanding, so no correction of text too?
French 'critique', instead of French CRITIC Jacques Derrida
Too fast comprehend.
Hi
You are just doing your task but without making it sure that the viewers understand what you are saying. Very poor performance!!!
Speak slowly miss! Or recite slow!
Simply teaching not explainning anything clearly.
Not even teaching. Just reading from a text prepared by someone else.
Don't depend too much on these courses