The Problem With Spider-Man Across the Spider-Verse
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
- Behold the irony of Spider-Man Across the Spider Verse a plot that rests on NOT breaking canon whilst simultaneously breaking it beyond repair.
#spidermanmilesmorales #spiderverse #acrossthespiderverse
DISCORD - / discord
MY OTHER PLATFORMS
ODYSEE: odysee.com/@An...
BITCHUTE: www.bitchute.c....
OTHER STUFF
SUBSCRIBE To the Podcast ARCHIVE Channel - www.youtube.co....
Check The Secondary (Gaming) Channel NOMZ
www.youtube.co....
Become A Channel Member -www.youtube.co....
Support The Channel on PATREON - / anomalyinc
FOLLOW UP VIDEO - th-cam.com/video/w9PNFFg6WfM/w-d-xo.html
Your content never shows up in my feed.
What if Miguel is wrong, and it’s a different thing entirely? That’s what I was thinking during this movie while he was explaining it. What if Miguel is completely wrong, and it’s something else entirely?
@@turtlesrprettycool3379 Feels like that's exactly what the movie is hencing at
@@kingj9664 so then this video just contributes to the movie
@@turtlesrprettycool3379 I guess but the way he puts it he makes it seem like that's a negative thing or something
If what Miguel said was verifiably true then Earth 1610 should’ve torn itself to shreds the second Miles got bitten
Also Miguel own reality should've been destroyed with all the Spidermen from different realities he invited.
@@rayvonvelez3129 well he's got the bullshit McGuffin wristband that prevents them from glitching
@@madambutterfly1997 I know. But it's still pretty funny he took such a big risk of his own reality inviting all these guys. Shows he didn't learn nothing. 😂
He's the villain, why would what he say be true? The whole conflict is about whether or not he's right.
Which is why Miguel's position is wrong. When you think about Miguel's position based on everything that's happened, it doesn't make sense. You even start to see the cracks in his position show emotionally-speaking after Miles escapes in the Go Home Machine.
The craziest part to me is how none of the spidermen besides Miguel werent actually able to keep up with Miles and they all were shown as being unskilled heroes. Seriously no way in hell should it be that easy for someone to shake all those spidermen and then Miles later saying he beat all of them when he ran from them☠️
That sh!t legit took me out of the movie. They are making Miles as some god almighty spider man who can do anything. Miles escape from spider society HQ was just ridiculous
You know why he succeeds and everyone else fails to catch him? Because he is Batman! I-I mean, because he is the chosen one in this movie. He is the protagonist, and I agree as well, they should have wrote this bit differently, they would easily catch him, and then later, while he is in prison, someone sympathetic to him, like I dunno, GWEN, breaks him out. That is believable, all the other plot armor that saved him is stupid
He is MC
He had a small head-start.
Plus, he knew where he was, whereas the other Spider-people had to spend time trying to find him.
And they might not have been as invested in catching him as he was in getting away.
His plot armor is made out of vibranium
Well glad I wasn't going crazy when I felt like 2099 was being used as some hit piece on fans
I feel like the multiverse in general is one giant clusterfuck, cause there’s a lot of threads that need to be tied together in order for it to make sense. This “canon” stuff definitely fits the bill for why I can’t get into it.
What?
You could argue that Uncle Ben’s death is the only actual Canon Event that matters in the context of what it means to be Spider-Man
I prefer how it was addressed in ITSV where the death of a family member was simply something they all had dealt with, not that it was a fated event. It's just something that thematically ties them together rather than something predestined by fate itself or else the multiverse will collapse.
@@coolman229 not thematically and not exactly predestined, but Uncle Ben’s death is actually necessary in the conception of Spider-Man. It was his fault: his selfish inaction caused his uncle’s death; therefore he must help when he can *because* he can, i.e. defin. Spider-Man, n. He who has both power, responsibility. Without that event the character does unravel.
But it's not always uncle Ben.
Miles didn't have an Uncle Ben moment in the comics, unless you count his Mom dying.
@@jeggsonvohees2201 You could see his uncle ben moment was with Aaron Davis.
I wouldn’t be surprised the proverbial spider spinning these webs that make up the “canon events” shows up in the next movie and says something like “Miguel, there’s no such thing as a canon event. The only reason that universe collapse was because you prioritized your own personal happiness over being Spider-Man”
So sayeth the spider...
Something like that probably, it will be interesting to see how they will wrap that plot point up.
Because you know... by color.
@@VITAS874 Pretty sure it's more than just the colors but whatever dude just keep hating on the movie
i think this comment is going to age very well
the sequel really has it's work cut out for it. gonna be really hard to pull things together in a satisfying way without being overly contrived. could see them playing it safe by outright ignoring some of the major holes you pointed out
I never thought I'd see you commenting under an Anomaly Inc vid of all places
@@xx_v_xx4373 well the man has taste obviously
I’m calling it right now that the sequel to this will divide fans like they did with TLA. There’s too many issues that can be resolved in one movie. Let’s remind ourselves the creators never really cared about Stan Lees vision of Spider-Man.
@@anomalyinc3239 oh for sure I dont doubt the taste. It's the differing communities that has me suprised, that's all
@@mrconroy4672creators? Do you mean Phil lord and Chris Miller, the creators of this movie, or are you referring to stan lee and steve ditko, the creators of the spider- man himself? If it's the former, than how do the creators not care about stan lees vision for Spider-Man? Can you even explain what "Stan Lee's vision for Spider-Man" is? This comment is making my head spin.
Also since Miguel just being in another reality broke that reality, how does he think inviting thousands of spidermen from different realities to his own reality is a good idea? Like why is he risking his own reality just to have a slumber party with a bunch of Spiderman. They really made Miguel a clown that is super hypocritical.
Which is a shame because he is one of my favorite Spider-Men
It kinda adds into the theory that this isn't Miguel but Morlun disguised as Miguel.
@@legofan370 I actually thought spiderman 2099 got turned into an inheritor when I first saw the trailers, only to remember that he has fangs naturally. I don't think the movie would've let miguel have an internal monologue if he was fake though. And if he was lyinf he trigger everyones spider sense.
@@GreaterGrievobeast55 But the thing is, that's what he injecting into his system. It's not Rapture but Miguel's DNA so nobody suspects him. As well as the fact that in the comics, I don't think he was ever a vampire.
It's entirely possible that his vampirism is just a reference to the original comic story, but I feel like there's something more there.
He’s find a way to contain people from being in alternate realities that’s the whole reason for the multiverse watch, slumber party ? it’s an hq they don’t stay there that’s implied when hobie said Gwen stayed at his house
Did anyone else notice how Miguel’s background was a bit of a middle finger to Doctor Strange 2?, that Miguel did what people were saying Wanda should have done in Doctor Strange 2, which was replace a version of herself in the multiverse that recently died.
Yep😅
I mean, it didn't work and resulted in a world dying so if anything it kinda showed why it wouldn't work. Plus, Mr. Fanstastic said there would be consequences for a person from the wrong dimension to stay too long.
To me it felt more like a middle finger to NWH. In that movie the directors completely retconned TH's spiderman just cause Raimi cannon crybaby fans wanted their version where Peter is unhappy and has no friends or family. Meanwhile, Accross the Spiderverse is saying with Miles "no, fuck you, it doesn't have to be that way!". Felt quite liberating. TH Peter Parker did not have to lose aunt May the way he did, the people he loves didn't need to forget him in that super contrived spell. Idk Accross The Spiderverse feels done right to me.
@@kayleee4065 Honestly, I would say it's more accurate to say it was a middle finger to Modern Spider-Man comics in general. How Peter constantly has to suffer, not grow, and never be happy.
@@kayleee4065that's not raimi, that's just what the character has always been
Another things to note is that miles isnt the original spiderman from his universe, his peter parker died so i just assumed he already went through the canon event, and why would miles need to fufill that canon if hes not canon? Also Peter B Parker's baby is actually an anomaly becuase she wouldn't have been born without the events of the original movie. Like what if Peter Parker had to kill his baby to save his universe, would he do it?
And miles uncle also died so that's 2 "canon deaths". This movie is so stupid lmao
@@elpeluca7780Peter wasn't meant to die in his universe, it's not a Canon event
these are great questions, but unfortunately people seem to forget the possibility that these questions are purposefully left unanswered and open-ended by the writers and are meant to be clarified in the next film as this is a two-part movie.
of course miguel is wrong about the canon, but that doesn't mean the film has plot holes, it means that miguel himself is either wrong or withholding information for his own personal reasons
@@bulliam Yah of course Miguel is wrong but that ends up making literally every spiderman retarded for listening to him. No one else in the whole multiverse could figure out he's wrong? Thats what makes this a film that can't be fixed, either Miguel is right which makes lots of plot holes, or everyone is extremely retarded.
Well, Peter B has experienced his canon events already.
Just got back home from watching Across the Spider-verse and honestly, I agree with you. The most damning thing about the plot is what an uncritical eye all the characters take to "canon events" when nearly every continuity of Spider-Man media has vastly different events that are not shared across the entire franchise. The only thing that is even remotely close to a "canon event" is the death of uncle Ben, but even that is not a constant.
Heck, in Spider-Man: The Animated Series Peter actually finds an alternate universe uncle Ben to convince Spider-Carnage to stop his madness of destroying all realities. Considering how much liberty the writers have taken in tying up all Spider-Man continuities into these films, this also means that the story can be fully critiqued based on what happens in those other stories. So in the case of TAS it in fact directly contradicts the very idea of "canon" by having versions of Peter Parker that are successful with living, breathing relatives.
Finally, I find the whole "canon event" talk in the movie to be a very hamfisted way of criticising fans for not accepting certain aspects of Spider-Man such as Miles Morales and other types of disliked Spider-Man media. It is pretty blatant what the movie is talking about and it is such a poor commentary at that, especially when it does a disservice to the first movie that successfully made Miles Morales a likeable character. Ripping into fans despite the first movie being overall very liked by fans of Spider-Man is just in such poor taste and comes off as petty.
I mean besides the overly angry spider man fans Laura's majority of people who saw this movie are Sparta and fans and didn't really have a problem with this plus this movie doesn't go completely outright attacking fans like people said it is it feels more like purities over reacting
I think Miguel is bulshiting the Spider people because of it, we can see multiple flaws in his plan, i think his plan is flawed because he can't accept that he might be at fault for the universe he destroyed (after all, that universe might had a super collider aswell)
This fits the narrative of how "oh this guy is not Spider-Man because he never had a uncle ben" because multiple universe didn't have an uncle ben, if the next movie we see Spider-ma'm (aunt may) then it will confirm that Miguel's logic is wrong as she never lost anything
Resuming: Miguel's logic is flawed on porpuse to criticize how nitpicking fans of the series also make flawed points aswell, how not all Spider-Man stories need the same events to happen.
@@indie_gamer7 The issue with that line of thinking is that it makes basically every single variation of Spider-Man who followed Miguel a moron. Not a single one points out any flaw in the "canon events" theory, yet all of them are supposed to be geniuses. They just straight up accept the premise without actually debating it thoroughly, even when Miles brings up some fairly legitimate points.
I've been a fan of Spider-Man since childhood from 90's and onward. Not a single show or movie of Spider-Man would have accepted "destiny" as an excuse not to save people. Using pre-destined events, "canon events", for a Spider-Man story and having practically all of them accept it as a fact is a massive betrayal of who Spider-Man is supposed to be. The story of his uncle's death hinges upon Peter Parker having the ability to have prevented it. He misused his powers and indirectly got Ben Parker killed because of his unwillingness to take responsibility for his gifts. If an event like uncle Ben's death is just destiny, then it robs Spider-Man of his own agency.
That's why Miguel being wrong makes the story even worse, since that makes practically all of the other Spiders complicit in preventing events that did not need to happen. It's just a cop-out excuse and the writers wrote themselves into a corner with a very anti-Spider-Man story.
@@Frozen_Death_Knight I don't know about all of that but it feels like a lot of over thinking and taking stuff too seriously. Cause doesn't really seem to make the story worse and doesn't really make all the Spartans morons because they did see what happened to that universe Miguel went to.
@@Frozen_Death_Knight thing is, Miguel more or less has a source to privide, if any asks why should they actually follow him he could bring up the fact he saw a universe and billions of people die because of it, this is something i doubt Spider-Man would risk, having their entire universe wiped because they thought "that's no way that is true"
We also see in the central there seems to be alot of people who don't trust what Miguel says, and there isn't Spider-leople who would prove his ligic is bullshit like Spider-ma'm
So again, would you be willing to risk your entire universe being destroyed to test to see if that logic is actually true?
Also we have to remember one thing, I don't think 616 or the movie Spider-man are there, with (repeting my last point) makes me believe he did not call any Spider-people who would prove that his logic is bullshit to his universe.
This movie sums up all my problems with multiverse storylines. The concept of a multiverse constant is one of the dumbest things ever conceived when in concept the multiverse is infinite.
It just becomes a mess
EDIT: also since the PS4 game is included that means it also goes against the "canon" because Peter and Miles are both active and Miles' uncle is still alive
I only accept at best an alternate dark time line where the heroes failed or turned evil, but not a whole Multiverse though because they always get too big, too complicated and then the questions always come "Why don't all the heroes team and stop big threat if one of them needs helps".
I think a general constant can work fine, more so when said "constant" is more a general tendency/isn't something overly specific and isn't an absolute occurrence. I guess in that same line of thought, that "universal constant" I would say is not the same as the trope of a "time-locked event" since I feel those tend to apply more to one specific timeline versus all timelines. Then again, those two concepts do tend to be used interchangeably.
I don’t get the appeal of multiverse storylines to be honest. Too big. Too complicated. They break story consistency and they always are about the worlds shattering. We as people get more invested about the story of a few people we get to see develop in their conflicts vs seeing universes of people we’ve never seen get obliterated.
@blumace22 I think when it is a more "limited" multiverse, things are far more interesting. That said, even if well written, a lot of multiverse stories far too often go with the general blanket statements of it being an "infinite" multiverse or that it is a multiverse where "every" possibility that could happen can and did happen.
In that same vein, and perhaps more importantly than it being an infinite or limited multiverse, is writers making it too easy, all things considered, to travel to other realities. Though, I guess it being hard to traverse the multiverse falls into the idea of a limited multiverse.
Time to boycott beyond the spiderverse. This is only going to be the ultimate disaster.
12:51 To preserve the newly established “canon event”, these Spider-people forgot about the classic establishment that is “With great power, comes great responsibility.”
What now?
If Miguel doesn't want to break canon, maybe he shouldn't have created Spider Society in the first place? Why would he clump all Spidermen from every universe in one place?
Maybe he knows a way to add all those spider people without breaking cannon.
Well he can't do all this shit alone and he needs all the help he can get but I imagine canon events are still destined to happen regardless if these Spider-Men aren't in their universes at the moment an event is supposed to take place.
@@BlueBlur2003 Yeah but Miguel destroyed his universe just by living in it. Imagine that x1,000,000,000 or something and you got a recipe for disaster. Even if they think they have a good understanding on how the multiverse works it's still a risk to both him, the universe he is in and everybody living in it, and every spider-person within the society.
The fact Miguel is ok poking the hornets nest seems a little off since he wasn't gonna take any chances letting Miles save his dad.
Yeah exactly it's like saying "oh the timeline is super fragile and we need to keep people from disrupting it.... So anyway I gave 100,000 spider men time machine bracelets 👍"
@@cleverballoon6535 Yeah, that's another thing I Just noticed. Did it ever occour to Miguel that some spidermen might be evil? Then again they can't be evil because if they become evil then certain canon events won't play out and their universe will die which means we can't have interesting stories with Evil spidermen or something as cool as that.
I have no issue with the concept of canon events as while they have changed the details in different continuities the end result is the same as they’re important for Spider-Man to grow as a character, however the movie should have done with a few changes in order to make Miguel’s argument for keeping anomalies in check better:
1) Instead of a police captain it should be someone else that particular Spider-Man cares about, within most continuities regarding Miles Morales along with his uncle dying it’s then followed some time later by either his father who is killed in the line of duty saving innocent civilians or it’s his mother who died by the hands of his main nemesis. (As it was Venom: 1610 who ended up killing his mom before the Ultimate Universe was destroyed.) So with that in mind Miles should be able to save his dad but also it comes at a heavy price, Spider-Man should on principle try to save everyone as much as he can but there also must be some losses as well.
2) Since it was established that Peter Parker: 1610 was never supposed to have died in the first place, Miles own universe should be glitching randomly within subtle instances in the background so that we know something is wrong but the characters themselves are oblivious to it at first. Shutting off the collider in the first film should have been like putting a small bandaid on a gaping wound, as the universe itself hasn’t recovered from the loss of the original Spider-Man. So with the revelation that the unraveling of said universe is getting much worse as time goes on because of his absence, aside from the existence of the Spot being an issue there also has to be a significant canon event set in place for Miles to go through to stabilize the unraveling or Peter Parker: 1610 would need to be revived in order to get the story back on track so to speak.
3) They should’ve had at least two more instances of canon events being broken and shown to us so that we have a bit more to work with on understanding them, as there was nothing to indicate of why Miguel taking the place of his alternate self would cause the canon of that universe to be disrupted.
Also regarding Peter Parker himself the Spider-Verse films often do him dirty with his portrayal, (with the exception of the original Blond Peter, but of course he had to be killed off early in the first film) not one version of Peter Parker besides Peter B. Parker (And believe me I have my own grievances with him) try to side with Miles Morales but also the fact that they were all stupid enough to follow him and leave the base undefended tells you all you need to know about what they think of him.
2099 TIENE LA RAZON!
There is a cult worship going on to Miles, an active character assassination going against Peter Parker too.
I have been here before with other stories, believe me, not with Peter Parker, do not touch Spider Man.
because most of the spidermen are just going after miles but they dont know why... they just trust miguel, use your brain
@@cunningflop Even if they trust Miguel they should all be smart enough to not leave the damn base undefended especially just for one rogue Spider-Variant, that’s just lazy writing given what we know of Spider-Man in general.
On the third point, it's fair to note that most of the peter parkers in the second movie haven't interacted with miles. I'd also vouch for Spiderman Noir since he's teamed up in gwens team at the end and was never shown chasing miles. It's likely that he wasn't a member of the spider society of course but That's still worth something
The worst part about it is that the writers said they specifically went with the "canon" plot and used that specific word because they wanted to stick it to the fans and say that Miles is Spiderman and not Peter Parker.
yep
They kill off and replace Spider-Man, and repeat over and over how anyone can wear the mask, and they disguise the whole thing as a loving tribute to the character, sprinkle a couple of memes and easter eggs on top that people recognize, but it’s more like JJ Abrams take on Star Wars. Anything that’s not a copy paste of the original trilogy is bad, so ignoring that the prequels happened is to begin to make things ”right”. But that’s not Star Wars. Star Wars is George Lucas. The Lord of the Rings is Tolkien. Spider-Man is Peter Parker.
@@anomalyinc3239 You're not taking into account that perhaps the cop in Mumbatan was going to die THAT day anyway! And that Miles and The Spot's existence changed the outcome of what was pre-planned.
Meaning, if Miles never existed, the cop would have still died that day anyway from some other accident. You're not taking that into account.
Cry harder lmao. You have 50 plus years of Peter Parker in comics, TV Shows, Movies, and video games to fallback on Mr. Fragile.
They are both Spiderman in the movie, as well as hundreds more Peters, what's the problem?
Here's the thing that fixes nearly every complaint you have with the movie. Miguel is wrong. Full stop. He's wrong. He thinks he knows that there are these things called canon events that have to happen or the universe gets wrecked, but there are literally only two data points that we have to draw on: Miguel's foster universe that he chose after he found an alternate family, and Mumbattan. The first we have no context for, and the second was just playing host to someone who's abilities involve breaking walls between dimensions. It's maybe implied that there have been more, but there's no other evidence for it.
Miguel's only been at this for a year and a half, tops. He has a way that he thinks the world works, and it's one that he's convinced himself he has to follow to make the multiverse function as normal, but he's wrong. We actually see Gwen stop a canon event in her world too: when she convinces her father to stop being a captain, which means that a police captain "close to spider-man" would not die, because she probably wouldn't be that close to the next police captain.
Your meta read is right: (11:50 in the video) "Any scenario can exist. Yes, there are some similarities, sure, but they aren't binding the fabric of the multiverse together." This is part of the point of the movie. The movie knows that. It tells you that before we see a single portal to another dimension, when Miles tells his councilor it's gross that he needs to have "a story" in order to get into college, and how she insists that their family are struggling immigrants when they are neither struggling nor immigrants. He also doesn't need "a story" to be Spider-Man. That is the message of the movie. (also, as a side note, we know that not all spider-people have had all their canon events happen yet, so that would be Miguel's explanation, which would be incorrect, for why Tom Holland's and Toby McGuire's Spider-Men haven't had their police captain moments yet.
Thank you people have forgotten characters can be wrong
When I first heard about “canon” events I actually thought that was a joke made by fans of the movie
Also hate how the fans of this movie are acting like it’s perfect and then go and say spider man 2 is overrated
It was a cool concept until I thought about it.
@@creedecriswell634 yeah it would be cool if it wasn’t called “canon”
@@thatoneroyalguard7060 I agree and they are using this to attack nerds who care.
@@creedecriswell634 so tired of fans getting attacked
I feel like many people are not aware of Miguel character in Spider Man Edge of Time Video Game.
When I saw the trailer I wasn't shocked because that game showed us how much he is more of a order comes first guy and not to mess with the timeline.
He like the parent telling to not do stupid things.
Heck even in the game I want to see MJ at first because it will mess with the timeline. But Peter questioned his worth of being a real Spiderman.
So that was when he decided to save her.
correct, he didn’t know the real meaning of being spider-man. also, this is unrelated but I love that the voice actors of both Spider-Man in that game where from spectacular Spider-Man and also the animated series from the late 90s.
Also the writer of Edge of Time was Peter David, the creator of Spider-Man 2099.
FINALLY, someone who’s not just uncritically praising this movie, I was shocked when no one was calling out how dumb it was.
"Spider verse is overrated" videos
I've seen NO ONE uncritically praise the movie. And it's not dumb.
I fell asleep during this snoozefest.
This guy didn’t pay attention to the movie and nether did you
Because it’s intentional
If this movie was more focused on TIMELINES and TIME TRAVEL, then emphasis on "constant" events being integral to the plot would make (a TINY BIT) more sense.
Yep but the writers are anti-canon.
Yeah I knew I wasn’t the only one that didn’t like the movie. It was one of the first times in awhile where I walked out of the theater and felt nothing. I didn’t love it or hate it. I felt nothing for it.
i bet youre fun at parties
@@cunningflop if your gonna insult me at least try to be original
@@spectre1004 you’re *
@@cunningflop grammar Nazi
@@cunningflopthese people are tripping lol
damn
The interview at the end. It's like they used every inch of willpower they had in them to not call people disliking miles "racists"
You can just feel that this is what they think and want to say but they know it would be seen badly (justifiably so)
Here is also an idea why doesn’t Tobey and Andrew glitch in no way home? They broke their own canon in this movie. 😂😂
It's possible that magic is a better way to allow multiverse travel than technology unless it Kang level technology.
its because those universes are similiar enough, im pretty sure in Dr Strange and no way home they said that each universe as a distinct energy signature, so the signature of their universes and the mcu are probably really similar.
Also they didn't break the canon, since the events of no way home would have had the same effect even if the other villains didn't come in this universe. Everyone would have forgot peter was spiderman and aunt may probably would have died from another villain
Or maybe those movies don't follow the same logic as the spider verse ones
@@kingj9664 they do, it’s the same multiverse
@@minerpvpgaming2160 Just saw your comment on the explanation and I think I like yours better
Thank you for pointing all of this out. While I enjoyed the movie, the problems borderline ruined it for me. Especially when the movie pulled a Loki. What’s the point of having a multiverse when the possibilities aren’t infinite, there’s no mystery to them now🤦♂️
You are in an endless cycle, the dork in you keeps going out and watching these meh movies, and you're disappointed every time. Your not the target audience, however you are a useless idiot to them. They can count on you giving them money in order to keep their message machine rolling.. it's sad because it will never end until you and your small group end it!!😅
the possibilities are infinite, but each universe is still separate and has certain events that will happen. This is because time is fixed. But some universes are identical to each other until a certain point where they appear to split. But if you travel to one of those universes at the time where they were identical, it would only affect one of them since they aren't actually splitting, but have been seperate the whole time
The possibilities are infinite, miguel is in the wrong. Thats why hes the villain. The entire point is to prove why hes wrong i dont understand what people don’t get🤦♂️
Well at least you said you enjoyed the movie
@@sauceenjoyer6511but why would a spiderman be the villain, especially since he seems to know a lot more than all the others? That's not who Spiderman is
Honestly, the idea of Canon Events is just bullshit. You made so much sense, I am completely convinced that you are correct. Also, Miguel and all the Spider-Men in the Spider-Society completely forgot about the biggest rule of being Spider-Man is not Stand By And Allow Others To Suffer Or Die Because You Do Absolutely Nothing. Miguel and the Spider-Society belief is bullshit. Also, it’s not Miles’ fault that he got bitten because he had no control of what happened and it’s not his fault that Peter died. It’s Wilson Fisk and Doc Ock fault for using the Collider and opening the multiverse.
Favorite part was when Miles went “I’m tired of people telling me how MY story is supposed to go!”
Like, bro is perfectly fine with destroying the multiverse just because he wants to be special. 💀
No it's because he wants to save his dad
that was not what he meant by that line at all lmao
Nigga thinks he's a superhero because he pressed a button
@@kingj9664 no, it's cause the writers want us to be that way cause that's how they themselves are.
@@williamturner6192 Pretty sure that's not the point Miles not always gonna try and save his day but also figure out how not to start these cannon events
Pizza Time
Tobey Maguire: 🍕⏲️
_"If I flip these cakes my parents will flip out!"_
"Nomz give me video"
"You'll get your video when you fix this DAMN DOOR"
You're not taking into account that perhaps the cop in Mumbatan was going to die THAT day anyway! And that Miles and The Spot's existence changed the outcome of what was pre-planned.
Meaning, if Miles never existed, the cop would have still died that day anyway from some other accident. You're not taking that into account.
This is basically the Spiderman equivalent of Loki.
There's no defending this movie lmao
Finally someone speaking the truth. Good to see another person who can critically think about a movie
I mean it's your truth not the truth. I can't help by critical you mean someone hating a movie you already didn't like
@@cyberpunklover161so what is your truth the truth
@@roadmaster9777 I don't know what do you think is the truth
@@user-uq9oe7sc5m No it's not, Yes the opinions of the movie are mixed but for the most part it was overwhelmingly positive reviews even most people don't really care for this and we said it was just okay. If you didn't like it fine that's you buddy
@Satan-is-gay-spread-the-word not really
Perhaps Miguel is a version of Kang the Conqueror who deceived other Spider-Men into accepting this supposed "canon." His goal might be to preserve the timeline. Miguel's similarities to Kang, such as having an assistant and coming from the future, are notable. It's possible that in Part 2, the Spider-Men will recognize this deception and unite to confront him.
Idk though, because in a post credit scene for the first movie, he was way happier and actually had humor.
"Canon event nonsense" The Movie heavily implies that 2099 is WRONG about how canon event's work. Try watching the movie again.
No, it does not no character in the movie ever challenges Miguel’s assertions not even the person who made the watch (Lyla) Miguel uses to travel the multiverse so this is obviously not just a Miguel is wrong thing its something that everyone in the movie supports because they have no critical thinking skills.
@@mahaajbradshawthelegendamo7631 I don't have the energy to explain this to you, try watching the movie again.
Remeber this and beyond were written as single film that Sony forced into two. You wouldn’t have the call out occured before the halfway point of a story
Does Miguel being wrong make the movie less dumb or what?
A lot of people are going to hate your video but I appreciate your honesty just like in Spider Man no way home.
Yeah. I definitely loved this film but Anomaly did have some good points in addition further proving how the multiverse concept is so stupid. But that’s not gonna stop me from enjoying the movie overall
@@perfectlybalanced8995same here this is a great Spider Verse sequel regardless of its massive flaws.
I'm just glad it wasn't a stupid strong female lead that took over the spotlight. Jessica Andrew's got on my nerves
i personaly hate the video because he thought that the cannon event thing was a plot hole even thought the movie has proven more than twise that it was infact wrong and is the main reason why miles tries to get home. from what i saw, he was just basicly saying when he is on mileses side and why miguel was wrong
@@perfectlybalanced8995 Same for me although I don't agree with this video period
I still like the movie in general. I agree with the point about Uncle Ben tho. What made it powerful was that it didn’t have to happen and could’ve been avoided. I never saw it as some prophetic type thing that was always destined no matter what
If Uncle Ben's death was completely unavoidable due to fate then that means that even if Peter made the morally right decision and stopped it from happening then someone else would just come up and shoot Uncle Ben, robbing the death of its entire purpose. Peter making a selfish decision and using his powers for personal gain indirectly led to his uncle's death which is why it impacts him so significantly and why he starts taking responsibility so seriously.
@@coolman229 and here you are saying more or less exactly what I just replied to you elsewhere. Cheers🥂
@@coolman229 yea exactly. Making it some canon prophetic event defeats the whole purpose of Spideys whole motive
time is fixed in general, so things that happen happen, its just that we don't know what will happen
I just think those "events" are ties to other universes. All Spiderverses are connected by the shared theme of "Spiderman". As long as Spiderman exists, even as a mere idea, the universes in question are part of the same net (which is why Spiderman can canonically meet the comic creator Stan Lee).
But let's say, someone time traveled to a Spiderman-comic verse and managed to alter the timeline to the point the comic is never written.
Once canonical event "Spiderman comic exist" gets erased, the spiderlink is gone. My guess is that it wouldn't matter that much it if weren't for Kingpin machine weakening reality thread, something like the universes are sort of sick and will die if cut out of the Spidernet.
So your main problem is that a character believes something that isn't true
Dawg miguel is obviously wrong canon events aren’t what miguel thinks and miles and gwens new band are going to prove that canon events can be changed its not a problem with the movie its just miguel who thinks hes right and will get proven wrong in the 3rd film
Predictable and probably thats gonna happen
My thoughts exactly.
@@tofu866
What?
@@dylansharp8471 Am saying the guys comments is probably whats gonna happen
.....Are people really not understanding that Miguel's interpretation of the multiverse is deliberately inconsistent to show that it's essentially a result of his trauma response and he's in the wrong? Like, that seemed pretty obvious to me.
Exactly, this bozo doesn’t understand that
I really didn't like ATSV which I'm sad about because I loved Into The Spiderverse. The mix between animation with live action elements was very jarring and I did not like it at all. I thought the hole was a terrible villain that wasn't funny and was really cringe. And the political flags and pins threw me off because it felt so forced. Plus the movies fan base on TikTok and Twitter is actually insufferable and makes me dislike it even more. Overall probably like a 3/10
Dude majority of the things you said doesn't even make the movie inherently bad. The cross between live action and animation happens like twice. The spot is a lame villain, and always was, but I feel like the directors made that the point of him in the movie as well, hence why he has a goal of becoming more powerful. And the political flags and pins you're talking about are rarely prevalent in the movie lol. I don't see how those alone make the entire movie a 3/10
The directors openly said they want to use Miquel to make fun of people who care about canon and will be more of a thing in the next movie.
indeed
And this will destroy any goodwill Miles may have had. No longer a liked character but now someone who tore down and replaced another character and that one people will resent. Heck last time this happened with the whole Parallax storyline with Hal Jordan and replaced with a new guy people were furious.
Well it backfired completely because we all know he is right and we are rallying behind him. Logical people that is, insecure people are drooling all over their new god Miles.
@@roboguy75 That was always the intent, they made Miles to kill Peter and they fucking know it. But nooo I have to smile be a good little goy smile for the new guy cus he is black and I dont wanna be le mean racist
Bullshit.
@@makutas-v261 Wait sorry if I’m confused but rallying behind Miguel?
I think youre pointing out the plot instead of pointing miguels logic because hes obviously wrong or lying and the first movie explains that the colliders are the real reason why the world collapses and not canon events but i hope that is the explanation in case of the third movie
My thoughts.
This dude is missing the entire point, just let him and everyone in the comments vent. They can’t be helped.
@officialzw2265 Yes cause that's the ONLY criticism right?
@@dr.feelgoodmalusphillips2475 Absolutely not, but the criticisms that actually exist in this movie don’t justify such a harsh rating and perceptive on an otherwise great film.
Sequel
Maybe time goes by faster in other universes which explains how Miguel’s time has gone by faster than Miles’
After watching the video and film twice, the only thing nagging me is how at the end of the film, a big moment of realization for Gwen and the audience is how her Dad chose to resign as police chief and nothing seemed to go wrong. Gwen even remarks during her final speech if I remember, that Miles showed her how anything is possible. No I still think its 100% possible that Miguel is simply misinformed (as opposed to being completely wrong) about the canon event thing. Even Miles himself tries to bring up how listening to an AI that determines "canon" is really messed up. So I still believe Miguel can simply be misinformed on the whole subject, as the purpose of the film itself is to challenge the whole "canon event" idea. They have to show examples that dhowcase why Miguel would believe such a thing, but its completely possible the real reason behind universal disruptions has not been revealed or is still being developed. Given how this is a Part 1 & 2 film, I think it is a little too trigger happy to conclude it makes absolutely no sense roght out of the gate. Wouldn't mind discussing bc thats always fun, and good or bad I'm always going to love this film so theres some bias there, but I do think it could all still work with a little more thought and patience. Even so, multiverse stuff is always tricky so I don't doubt that there is a mess here and there.
Finally someone with some sense
Finally someone with some sense
I really hope that's the case for the movie
The only comment that understands that the whole point of the movie was to argue against the idea of canon events
Or the next person who becomes captain dies :v
What Miguel doesn't know was that Peter Parker was already Spider-Man when Miles got bit.
11:49 That’s exactly what I’m saying! The idea of Canon Events is BS and it contradicts what a multiverse is about. The spider verse is clearly unlimited, in fact there was formerly a spiderman game called Spiderman Unlimited and the multiverse was brought to a universe and somehow all of those universes are intact. A multiverse with unlimited universes means that there are infinite possibilities like universes where Miles could still be bitten by the spider but Peter doesn’t die with various possibilities like him being able to stop the collider after saving Miles or even try teaching Miles how to be a spider-man awhile stopping the collider. There were unlimited possibilities of that situation where Peter lives or dies and maybe Miles could also die.
BECAUSE IT FUCKING INTENTIONAL
omg, this is 2 part movie, it’s intentional
@@dumflame Ok…
how do all the of spidermans have time to actually save their neighborhoods when theyre part of a multiversal society bent on making sure 9/11 happens (canon event).
I hate cinematic universes for yhis reason
They are never handled well
False.
I love an Anomaly rant… I geuss you were the original Anomaly…
That's the risk of doing a time travel/multiverse/parallel universe story, it will never make sense and there will always be contrived stuff for the plot to happen
Miguel is pissed that a random spider bite the wrong person. Like Miles has control over a spider biting him. Lol 😆
I would think he'd take more issue with Kingpin for making the collider in the first place which is what actually caused this
He's pissed miles is running amok despite the consequences. Like a kid trying to run around in traffic, there parents will probably yell at them afterwards. Like even before telling spiderman about the canon events he still basically hitchhiked across the multiverse and ignored the fact he wasn't invited
I also feel that even though I dislike this movie, I feel outnumbered by all the fans who love it. It’s like they’re forcing me to like it. Like they’re brainwashed by it. You ever feel forced to like something you don’t?
theyre gaslighting you by the sounds of it
You don't get WHY they like it do you?
The worst thing is if Miguel is right and there are canons. First of all, how can they be in the multiverse? Secondly, it significantly devalues the tragedy of the Spider, which was individual for each spider, and now it turns out that it's not Peter's fault that the criminal killed Uncle Ben, but the universe decided so
I understand your points but I feel like a lot of this could easily be explained in the next movie. Miguel is clearly suffering through trauma and he's not thinking straight. That or they show he was lying to Miles this whole time and he was doing all this for his own selfish reasons. It's inconsistent sure but it's the good type of inconsistency that leaves me wanting more. So I'm hoping they acknowledge these things in Beyond the Spider-Verse.
My thoughts exactly.
What I find funny is people priasing it whilst highlighting it's issues, issues that would typically make any other film bad. I also can't stand multiverses, it's just there to circumvent bad creative decisions and poor writing.
yeah 99% of reviewers pussed out on this one
@@anomalyinc3239 They certainly did.
@@TheAutistWhisperer Maybe because the issues in this movie aren't that big like how they are and other films. Even with the cannon event until that point the movie was Still pretty good plus it really does seem like the fact that there are so many inconsistencies with this it's kind of obvious that it makes a film Miguel is in the wrong with how cannon events work.
@@anomalyinc3239 huh, you have pretty low standards towards other Reviewers that doesn’t agree with you, huh?
@@kingj9664The issues are massive, but voice acting, action scenes, comedy character relationships, beautiful animation plus the first being a good movie make people blind to it.
I mean canon events likely aren't supposed to be a thing that makes sense, like I am absolutely sure Miguel is either lying or (hopefully) doesn't fully understand how they work but doesn't want all his suffering to be random and "meaningless" in some objective universal sense, or something along those lines.
obviously you're allowed to dislike the film the same way I'm allowed to like it, but I don't think the canon events being weird logically is an accident. Especially since these Spiderverse movies are really good at tying everything together
Miguel is so different physically and character wise that I honestly wonder if it's a different Miguel that took the place of the one we saw in ITS.
Honestly, the whole Spider-Verse in the first place makes Spider-Man feel like a meaningless disposable hero. Why? Because there’s trillions of him, there’s more of him than there’s power rangers lmao. It strips away all the cold-detailed elements that make Spider-Man what he always has been and a “universally grounded” character.
I was waiting on this🗿 finally a review thats not mindlessly giving this movie praise.
What?
wait this movie contridicts the 90's animated spider man show because in one episode it deals with the multiverse concept and we are shown a version of spider man that still has his uncle ben.
“If not for Uncle Ben, ‘MOST’ of us wouldn’t be here.Not literally all will suffer the same fate
The movie said the multiverse has canon events. So said events are supposed to happen in every universe. So spider man has to lose someone. Yet in the 90's animated spider man show in the multiverse arch we are shown a version of spider man that still has his uncle ben. This movie is contradicting it's self.
@@HopeReviews
False.
@@dylansharp8471 Why are you replying 9 months later, let it go
So... no mention of Uncle Ben, or any other death in the family being counted as a CANONICAL event that served as the CREATION of Spider-Man?
Oh my god, Uncle Ben's death is practically a joke at this point. 😑
Well that does explain the spicy memes of him as of late lol!
There is? We're shown that explicitly
What are you talking about? They absolutely mention uncle ben
Lol you go straight to hate videos without actually watching the movie yourself uncle ben was mentioned as one of the most important reasons spiderman becomes spiderman lmao😂😂😂
Affirmative Action: The Movie
Thank you for this video!! I’m so glad to finally see one actually criticizing this movie for its flaws and not just blindly praising it. I don’t hate Miles; he’s just a character that I’ve never connected with nor has he ever interested me. Honestly, the only reason I saw this movie is because of Miguel O’Hara. Spider-Man 2099 is my personal favorite, and they totally disrespected him. Spider-Man: Edge of Time did such a better job, but I guess that what happens when the creator, Peter David, is directly involved.
Also, it was also a huge turn off that they pushed the whole Miles is the best Spider-Man thing. I didn’t even know that they had that agenda, but I definitely felt it. You don’t put that in the actual movie. That undermines everything. You’re letting haters affect your art, which by the way has a negative effect on the people who already don’t like/care for Miles. And it didn’t helps that they made him seem like a spoiled brat in the process.
Not sure they're actually trying to put a gender that miles is the best spider person Seeing as Gwynn also had some time to shine and they highlighted a bunch of other spider people. Plus miles didn't come across as a spoiled Brad if anything he just comes across as a kid who cares way more about his family
Promoting Miles'dad our of nowhere? Dude what are you smoking thinking that's something unbelievable when facturing in his father personality?? If you wanna play it rhis way, than Peter getting bitten by the spider in the first place could be seen as a convenience for the plot since he was at the right place at the right time for the spider to be out just when Peter was in there. But yet you think Miles'father being promoted captain is absurd? Also the plot of the canon is supposed to be flawed! Jeez its not like Miguel is the ANTAGONIST! Maybe, maybe Miguel is just wrong about the thing he is saying too??
A few additions I would include is that it’s established that dimensions without spidermen collapse, yet in the spider society city we see spidermen driving cars and working jobs meaning they are unable to protect their own dimensions. Additionally with the Mumbatten canon event, the spider people tried to stop the activation of Alchemax and the destruction of that part of the city which would have itself saved Inspector Sindh.
they never established that at all have you seen the first film? and also the canon event comes at a random, random moment where a police captain dies, it's not a specific moment it just happens
@@tbrown5836 Your argument doesn't even make sense. The Police Captain event is a specific canon event in time.
Yeah this movie triggers me a lot, I'm like why would all these peter parker's agree with this random future spiderman? His comparison to what miles wants to do and what he did, makes no sense. Miles ain't going to another version of himselfs reality and steal their family. Miguel was very selfish at what he did, it was his fault what happened to that reality. But he wants to blame miles for everything. The thing that really pissed me off, is having spectacular Spider-Man my favorite version of Spidey, working with this clown. Spectacular Spider-Man would never agree with what Miguel wants to happen to miles, never. This version of Spiderman 2099 is very badly written. Atleast in video games version of 2099 he is actually a good guy so much that he wants to save the original Spiderman from dieing in Spiderman edge of time, this movie 2099 obviously wouldn't try to save peter but the game one would he does. That's the whole plot of the game, saving Spiderman from death. But movie 2099 is going around telling everyone that someone important to them will die and they should let them die cuz it is canon. No he shouldn't even be telling them that cuz whenever a character dies that is important to Spiderman they're never supposed to know this person is dieing wether it be uncle Ben or a police captain they're not supposed to know, that's why these Spidermen can never save them. But Miguel is over here spoiling it for them and making miles go against him. Here's the truth if Peter parker Spiderman knew uncle Ben was going to die he 100% would try to save him no matter what.
Miguel didn’t want miles to make the same mistakes he did. And yeah actualyl miguel is a prick In the comics and willing to kill so I thought it was pretty in character
I am at the point that I just do not care about multiverses in movies or series. It just reeks of laziness, either it be MCU, Spiderverse and so on. Just end this trend and get back to stand alone superhero stories again, like everything pre-MCU.
Wrong.
You know what Miles Morales and Static Shock from DC have in common? They both have dads that are cops and they have know clue that they're sons are superheroes.
You wanted to say black so bad.
They both also have electric powers
@@mcharlton67 how would u know
@@mcharlton67both their dads are black, there you happy now
@@stevenpina1983 How much did it kill you to have to mention black and dad in the same sentence 😂😂. Please don’t go and commit any mass shootings lil incel.
Not a plot thing, but one thing I wondered was, when did gwen and miles take the photo she has? And where were the other spider peeps in the photo, weren't they there too?
Why am I not remotely shocked that this movie decided to attack fans who (rightly) don't see Miles as the real Spiderman? Their logic to justify their views just proves how fans, like myself, are right about this. They used the terrible "muh representation" argument to justify his existence, which is literally why people like me don't see him as Spiderman. Miles was created primarily to tick boxes, thereby implying that the real Spiderman isn't good enough due to his race, which is obviously really racist. The idea of Spiderman being for everyone meaning that he has to "represent" everyone, is just ridiculous. By that logic, every black superhero should also have a white alternate version, because there are white people who like that character too and should be "represented" by them. Somehow, I don't think they would be ok with their logic being applied the other way around.
This is why derivative copy characters almost always suck, because just taking a character and arbitrarily changing their base characteristics, such as race, doesn't add anything of value to that character. It actually takes away from that character, by implying that anyone could be that hero and that the specific things that make that person a hero aren't important to that character. That hero is no longer a unique person, whose specific qualities caused them to become who they are, but instead merely a costume and power set, that can be adopted by anybody who vaguely meets the bill. It can be done well with good writing, such as with the Robin mantle being passed on when the previous Robin stops being Batman's sidekick and becomes their own independent hero, but it's very rare that this is the case.
The irony is that the first movie actually made me like Miles more, by making him more of his own character and not just "Spiderman, but he's black". This movie recons him to be the whole reason Peter died in his universe and tries to turn him into "the most special Spiderman, who's the key to everything!". They wanted to elevate him above Peter, which I always respected the first movie for not really doing, and made turned Peter into a clown in the process. I think this pretty much undoes all the good will they earned from me from how they handled Mile in the first movie.
They also demonised Spiderman 2099, who is probably the least derivative version of all the Spiderman clones, because he's much more of his own character, and not just a race swap, gender swap or some other arbitrary change. He is the Terry McGinnis to Peter's Bruce Wayne, who takes over as Spiderman in the far future, after Peter has died. That's already a lot better then just "What if somebody else was Spiderman in the present day, and did the exact same stuff as Peter would be doing, but their not a white guy!" Even so, he's still not the real Spiderman. Peter Parker will always be the real Spiderman.
I don't like Miles because originally he was just a race swap Peter parker.
He now get shoved into where he is not needed
Most of his fans only like him because he is a certain race and think it is the "right" thing to support because of his race
I just don't enjoy him
And I see they're slowly trying to wiggle up to making him into a MCU film character and if they could Marvel wants to ditch Peter for him.
Nobody denies that Peter is the real Spider-Man. Miles is just another one. It doesn't matter why he was created, in the movies he is a good character, that's all that matters.
@@Сайтамен Doesn't him being "another" Spiderman really just prove my point? If there can just be "another" Spiderman, then Spiderman isn't special anymore. To paraphrase Syndrome from The Incredibles: "And when everyone's Spiderman, no one is." I don't deny that they made him a better character in the movies, and I'm happy they did. I still will never see him (or any of the others) as Spiderman, because there can only be one true Spiderman. I don't care if people like him or not. I'm just calling out the filmmakers for attacking people who don't when it's an entirely valid position to hold.
@@RomanHistoryFan476AD Yeah that's pretty much my take away too. I'm so bored of him being shoved into everything for no reason, just because Spiderverse 1 was popular. The PS4 game now having 2 Spidermen active in the same place, at the same time, is just ridiculous and shows how pointless Miles really is. He's basically Peter's token Robin. Spiderman doesn't need any sidekicks or sidemen. Just have Spiderman stories be focused on the actual Spiderman.
@@JaimieSch Yes, everyone with Spiderman powers is Spider-Man, one per universe, and most stories are set in one universe. He is still unique as a person.
i think people are made to believe miguel's explanation of the multiverse and canon are true. But we have points where that is contradicted. Even mgiuel doesnt actually say the cannon is 100 percent correct. He just knows the chances of messing with it most likely will cause a catastrophe. The line " do you know what will actually happen if the the canon is broken" Miguel responds"do you want to find out?" Miguel isnt willing to roll the dice and destroy another universe. The guy is riddled by guilt over what he did and has made it his mission to stop the further damaging of the canon, whether if it's misguided or not. As an audience member i walked away realizing the canon events are fallible. They arent as hard wired as miguel and spider society want you to believe. Imagine the spiderverse and cannon events could be seen as emotional crutches for the spider people.
Imagine feeling guilty over letting someone you love die, having it seemingly be predetermined by fate can really ease that guilt. Imagine someone like miles comes in and proves canon events arent so stead fast. Well thats every spider person who had a major life defining loss being told, oh yeah that per-determined destiny stuff was a lie and you actually could have saved your loved one if you had done something differently. when you look it that way protecting the canon becomes more important whether its bullshit or not. Even on a level of meta-commentary this even works with how fans define cannon in fictional works that they like such as spider man. Something to think about.
I really dont see the issue with beginning of the movie (getting to the point) These scenes have great character moments that really define the tone of the film and set up mile's journey and where belongs as well what he thinks he needs as opposed to what he discovers about himself. In the beginning of the movie miles is so desperate to belong with his friends and spider society, and he has to realize that he defines his own path( you really get hints of this from Hobbie when he says "you can make your own fancy watch,you dont need this"} and realizes this and that speech he gives his mom at the end of the movie really defines that arc for him in the movie. I though it was great character writing that only left me feeling more endeared to the characters, as well just great scenes that to me balancd out the later half of the film which was pretty much an giant action scene on 11.
When Miguel calls Miles "the original anomaly" it's absolutely fair to assume that he's referring to the origin of this specific chain of events involving Spot and the India universe, rather than the first ever anomaly across the infinite multiverse, which is very obviously not true. It's just stupid that the writers cared more about the impact of their meta commentary BS than the clarity of their characters and plot. But to be really semantic, the "original anomaly" should be Spot activating the collider to bring the spider to this universe, since it predates Miles being bit.
Also, when and how did Spot find this other spider?! Watching the original film, it seems the incident with Peter Parker is the first time the collider is used, since 1. Kingpin has yet to achieve his goal of bringing back his family. 2. There hasn't been prior earthquakes or glitches across the city. 3. Kingpin is doubtful Olivia even has the collider working. 4. The collider is operated by a team under the command of Kingpin. Unless Spot SOMEHOW activates the thing in secret by himself, why would Kingpin approve the collider be used to give a random scientist spider powers?
Actually the collider was used one time before. At the beginning of the film while Miles is walking by his old school someone asks if Miles felt the earthquake last night. Harking to the fact the collider seemingly causes a earthquake everytime it’s used as people say the next time it happens. This refers to how Gwen also appeared in the universe before all the other Spider-Man. Granted, it’s a small line but it’s there to explain it
I guess Miguel doesn't know that is was Spot that causing the problem?
I don't know man "Into the spider-verse" is just better and had like more life in it. This one's just random shit thrown at you.
Does anyone really expect us to believe that the Spider Rex in the movie had a police captain in his world that had to die in order for it to stay in tact? Wtf?
This movie really just sets the standard for turn brain off and consume product. Point at things from other things and say “I remember that! This is awesome!”
But you are not questioning a trex having super powers to begin with 😂
@@BluEx22329 superpowered dinosaurs are actually relatively common in the marvel universe! Devil dinosaur, Stegron, Reptil, Sauron (if you count pterrosaurs, which comic writers seem to like doing even though it's inaccurate) etc
@@BluEx22329 there was a spiderman t Rex in the movie chasing after miles.
So if miles is as smart as they portray him to be then that whole “captain close to spiderman” canon rule is bs because I’m sure there were no police captains in the time of the dinosaurs. So then he would figure out that Miguel is lying, which is what a lot of people are saying in order to cover the movie’s plot hole.
@@bcroyceart if the spider Rex is a superhero, that probably means he fights crime. If he fights crime than the dinosaur world has a society that imposes laws, and like has dinosaur law keepers to impose it.
@@GreaterGrievobeast55 that is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard
Like NWH, I skipped this one and saw Transformers instead. Now that was a fun movie!
The biggest turn-off for me is when they made Miguel O’Hara, one of my personal favorite Spider-Men, act like the villain. From the second he appeared in the trailer attacking Miles for seemingly no reason, I knew something was up.
SpiderVerse at least felt unique but now, it’s a heavy multiverse film. Another turn-off.
the first itsv was a multiverse movie, it was just with not that much characters
That’s why it worked. It wasn’t overbloated. Here, it’s like nothing makes each Spider-Man universe interesting if they go through the exact same thing.
That’s why the concept of a multiverse is there, because different events can happen.
@@jw_gojifan19 I mean there was always gonna be more spiderpeople in the sequel
Spiderverse was a multiverse movie😂
@@Young_Wrath
One that did not need the crumbling MCU to be good. I am so sick of seeing MCU stuff
So correct me if I am wrong. Anomaly is a character that does not belong to s specific universe. Therefore, how can Miles be the original anomaly when Miguel broke the canon and officially became an anomaly first? Also the spider from earth 42 came into Mile's universe which in itself is an anomaly so shouldn't the canon be broken then and there and Mile's earth collapse as a result? I agree with you on this point there is no cohesion between the movies. Across the spiderverse feels like its own event.
Nomz. Posting this video breaks a canon event. You're destabilizing our universe we're all going to d-
It's got continuity problems, it's got plot holes, Miles has plot armor, it's got forced derived tension and a forced "representation" message. But the art style and music design are good and the screen play is sick. No one see's Miles Morales's story and thinks "he's just like me" "he just a regular guy" after seeing this movie, they think "He's at the center of whole spider verse it's all revolving around him" "I guess he's no regular guy".
All the visuals and lights always distract folks from the deeper issues. Like the woman with the big tits and the pretty face who's secretly a bitch in sheep's clothing. They'll always fall for it. It's depressing.
"It's got continuity problems, it's got plot holes, Miles has plot armor, it's got forced derived tension and a forced "representation" message"
What?
Maybe it's just me but 'Canon events' just cheapens every loss Spider-man has gone through in every iteration
And I've never understood why there's only one Miles in this movie
This is the Spiderman equivalent of Loki. There's no defending this movie.
False.
Anomaly this video is an example of being so focused on what was being SAID you neglected everything the film was communicating to you NON VERBALLY
Canon events don’t exist or at least not in the way Miguel describes them. Miguel states that any deviation from the timeline will result in the universe collapsing and all denizens from it dying. Except the film provides us three instances that show is Miguel misunderstood the situation. Miguel states that Gwen’s canon event was that father getting killed. Yet when Gwen returns home at the end of the film we learn that Gwen’s been gone for three months and that her father quit the force meaning his “canon event” is invalid. As Miguel specified a POLICE OFFICER close to a Spider-Person must die
I know what you’re thianking “the film never states WHEN Gwen’s father was supposed to die” and you’re correct which is why the film provides us with two BIGGER pieces of evidence of evidence that Miguel came to the wrong conclusion.
Miguel rants to Miles that he’s the “originally anomaly” and he wasn’t supposed to be Spider-Man and that Blond Peter should’ve lived. But the film also states Miles has been Spider-Man for over a year, if canon events were truely threats to the universe wouldn’t Miles’ universe have been destroyed by now? Furthermore if Miles was never “meant” to be Spider-Man why does he even have a “canon event”?
Finally the biggest piece of evidence that canon events are baloney (and the film is aware of this) Mayday. The fact it’s been long enough in Peter B’s dimension to rekindle his romance with MJ, get her pregnant and have a a kid a few months old (she can’t be newborn as otherwise MJ would’ve been on a maternity leave taking care of her) shows Miguel misunderstood the situation.
Remember, Peter B. only gained the courage to go back to his MJ and want kids because of his adventure with Miles. If Miles is truley an anomaly than Mayday should be an even bigger one given she only exists because of experiences that occured in another dimension.
Though you’re probably now wondering what caused the collapse of Miguels’ universe. I can’t say for sure but there’s multiple characters in the marvel universe that can destroy dimensions like The Time Variance Authority, Galactus or Unicron (the first piece of transformers media outside of the toys were comics by Marvel, with Spider-man guest starring in the third issue). Hell it could even have been spot as Gwen’s comment in the first film about “literally being knocked into the previous week” shows that different dimensions run on different time scales with some even able to take one back in time (keep in mind most of Gwen’s time running away was in non-Miles universes hence how Gwen could still be missing for months)
While writers can forget the rules they established that often happens with sequels contradicting prior installments, I doubt any film maker would be inept enough to establish these kind of rules and present several pieces of eveidence in the same film disproving these rules. Also keep in mind this is only half a film, Across and Beyond originated as a single script and this film’s it’s first trailer even had part 1 in the title.
Sony likley forced a title change out of fear of hurting the film’s box office after the dividing the book into two trend from the 2010s crashed an burned. I’d bet really money there will be a point where either Miguel realizes his hypothesis was wrong or somebody disproves the BS he spews. After all how hard would you scrutinize The Two Towers before Return of the King? This isn’t a case of a sequel being greenlit, this film is literally one half of a whole story and we just need to wait for the second half of the script.
The story is incomplete in the most literal sense, and these complains are details the film WANTS you to notice like forshadowing in any novel.
Making an antagonist stupid is terrible writing. Miguel O'Hara was made an idiot, with a flawed theory, just so the token characters can show how dumb he is.
this is the worst video ive ever seen. These points are coming out of a 3-year-old
You weren't paying attention to the movie and your not really thinking about it enough.
First, not every event that is supposed to happen is a canon event. Canon events are events that tie the universe together, so if they don't happen the universe will be destroyed. Thats why miguel was able to live as an alternate version of himself for a period of time
1. Miguel is probably wrong, he is the villain.
2. Singh would have died anyways, because it was a canon event and he was meant to die.
3. It could just be an alternate version of Donald Glover's prowler, they never said its the exact one from the mcu
4. They didn't say he needs to be crushed, Peter was the kid in amazing spiderman 1 that Captain stacy saved
5. They were setting up Miles's character and relationships, the plot isn't the only thing in a story
6. Your saying that If something didn't happen, then something else wouldn't happen. Thats not a complaint, thats just stating how the plot of a movie works.
7. Miguel is wrong, he hasn't been to every universe with spiderman, the next movie is beyond the spiderverse, so they will probably visit other universes that Miguel couldn't access where the police captain doesn't die
8. Captain Stacy probably died after spiderman 3 in a similar manner, the footage was just easter eggs. Tom Holland's captain stacy will probably die at some point as well.
9. There are more than one canon events in every universes, and its not the same event for every universe even if it might be similar (like the police captain)
10. Time is fixed, and they showed that in loki and avengers endgame, there are multiple universes but each universe is set. Any scenario can exist, but Miguel hasn't been to all of the infinite universes.
11. Miguel obviously brainwashed or lied to the other spidermen and they accepted it because it made them feel better about their traumatic experiences. He probably kicked out and got rid of all the ones that disagreed with him.
12. Peter B Parker was convinced by Miguel because Miguel told him it was for the greater good and that if uncle ben lived billions more would have died. He doesn't realize that Miguel might be wrong until the end of the movie.
13. Miles's spider gave him more powers which is why he is stronger and his powers are all probably stronger. The other spidermen weren't trying their hardest to catch him except Miguel. They also didn't expect him to endanger the entire multiverse which is why he escaped when they were surrounding him.
14. Miguel was able to access other universes but he would glitch without the watch, the watch prevents him from glitching and makes the technology to travel between universes smaller. His universe is in the future so time probably works differently, so for him it was probably a lot longer than 16 months even though it was only 16 months in the other universes. He didn't realize it was destabilizing until after that post credit scene. (this is the only good point you had though)
15. Its not people who cross into the wrong universe who are anomalies, its people that change the events that would have happened and the people that are changed.
16. Miguel either is placing guilt on Miles because he is wrong, or ITSV happened before he took over the alternate version of himself.
17. No way home was after ITSV, Miguel references it like it just happened in ATSV. Also his universe was almost destroyed but since everyone forgot the peter was spiderman the canon events that were going to be prevented were prevented from being prevented which stabilized the universe.
18.Loki took place outside of time so the events are happening simultaneously when it comes to people inside of time. Also he didn't destabilize the multiverse, he just allowed it to exist.
19. The mcu isn't completely dead yet, and even if it is, these were just easter eggs, its not going to actually affect this movie. This isn't an actual complaint of the movie.
20. After he wiped out a universe, he started making sure that it doesn't happen to any other universe.
21. the other supercolliders were prevented by their spidermen, just like kingpin's was supposed to be in ITSV. There are other universes where it happened but they are probably beyond Miguel's reach and will probably be explored in beyond the spdierverse.
22. That canon event would have happened anyways.
23. Not all events are canon events Canon events are events that tie the universe together, so if they don't happen the universe will be destroyed. Stopping the supercollider was just an event that was supposed to happen, not a canon event. Thats why also why miguel was able to live as an alternate version of himself for a period of time but when he accidently and eventually disrupted a canon event his universe was destroyed.
24. Everything with miles wasn't a canon event, only certain things are canon events. All the canon events that had to do with Miles's peter probably already happened so none of them were broken. Miguel thinks his dad has to die but because miles is an anomaly his dad's death probably isn't a canon event.
25. Spiderman existing wasn't a canon event in earth 42, however, the police captain dying was which is why earth 42 captain morales still died even though miles didnt actually become spiderman in that universe.
26. The themes of the movie is about free will and what has to happen and restrictions, and acceptance. That is reflected in real life by people who tried to restrict miles and didn't accept him. It still works in the story even if you have no knowledge about the real life events which is why it being meta isn't a problem.
Finally a good argument
So it goes against everything Spiderman is for the sake of making one the good guy and the other the bad guy, sacrificing character integrity to a story ,(and a dumb one at that). Shitass movie
26 is bad argument
@@yalovoyhznepomny I don’t remember what I was responding to
@@minerpvpgaming2160 26) Miles was not tried to subdue in any way. He was told that his father must die for the good of the universe. This does not fit the census of human history in any way. Miles was not controlled or manipulated by anyone- this phrase does not suit him very well
this movies plot feels like it was written by an 8 year old on scratch paper and its the biggest movie of the year its really depressing
not really. There are many opportunities to fix the "problems" that this movie has in the next one. That's not saying that this movie can only be fixed by its sequel, since this movie is good on its own, but the sequel can easily give more explanation and more characterization to characters, especially Miguel. Everyone is theorizing that he is infact wrong about the canon and the reason hes angry is because he's projecting his guilt onto Miles
That’s head canon bullshit. These writers literally made this plot just so they can attack fans for not liking shitty ass miles morales and using one of the only beloved alternate Spider-Man to do it
@@R1ck_Ryder Its not lmao. Its deadass what nearly every sequel does, especially if the previous movie ends on a cliff hanger. The next movie is gonna explain better explain the events of this movie and more, that's just common sense. What I said about Miguel being wrong is just theories, not being taken as actual fact. Hell you can even get hints of that from watching the movie lmao.
This isn't even an attack on fans, the only people who would see this as an attack are those who think Miles is just a race swapped Peter Parker. I can agree that Miles was originally written to be a black Peter Parker in the original comics, but that's not how he's written in these movies. He's not THE spider-man thats replacing Peter, hes a kid following his footsteps.
Tell me what you think is wrong with this movie besides "Miles isn't the real spider-man"
@@ajjones6682 see the 39 minute video we’re watching and I don’t have the time to write an essay on why these movies are ass. Sheep are gonna sheep and I’ll just skip them from now on. Enjoy your slop kid
@@ajjones6682There's literally an interview saying they did that to spite the critical folk.
This whole "canon event" is reminds me of a scene in Mortal Kombat 11. Raiden states that in every timeline him and Liu Kang fight and he always kills Liu Kang in every one of them.
That's also total bs because that never happened in the original timeline or in MK vs DCU (It was a separate continuity or timeline). It only ever happened in the rebooted timeline and the other made up timelines that were shown in Mortal Kombat 11.
Just wanna say, even though Miles’ universe wasn’t destroyed, it’s still in jeopardy because the canon still changed and the Spot is now a problem
I found this movie weird and never ending I couldn’t watch the flash animation and weird cut scenes. I walked out of the movie theatre finding this entire movie rather boring and weird.
I remember the movie got delayed by like a year, to me It seems like Sony saw how much of a hit no way home was, they probably wanted to try and replicate that with this film. It just doesn't end up working imo but because we get fan service, cool action scenes and visuals people over look its faults. I think they should have just focused more on the villain instead of doing the multiverse nonsense
Thank you for finally saying what needed to be said about this movie, I had the same problems you have with it. So thanks again for not falling in line with the rest of marvel and Sony dick riders 😂 keep doing what you’re doing brother 🍻
So you're saying because you didn't like it, no one can like it
@@mmm-fs4kb A gaslighting fan? Trademark of a bad movie.
@@user-uq9oe7sc5m So telling My opinion is gasligting now.
@@user-uq9oe7sc5m
That's not what they said.
Surely Gwen coming back to see her dad was breaking a "canon event" because he wouldn't have quit being captain if she hadn't come back
I'm pretty sure it was And whenever beyond comes out I'm sure they'll probably explain how to bring a can event without destroying the universe
That’s the point: that’s the film telling you Miguel’s hypothesis was incorrect. Why doesn’t anybody understand that characters within the story can be ill-informed?
@@skibot9974 my thoughts exactly.
@AtomicAsashi there are so many other things that could’ve destroyed his universe: the TVA, Galactus, Spot (the fact Gwen was “knocked into last week” in the first film shows sometimes dimensional travel and overlap with time travel)
On the subject of "canon events" I'm fine with it in concept, as it's a mix of fixed points in time and a "Constants&Variables" between universes.
But they should have just sent Miles back, let him try, let him fail to save his dad if that's really meant to happen, after all Indian Spidermans anomaly only happened because of multiversal intervention, on his own things would have played out as canon dictates.
Something I also hate about the movie is that every version of Spider-Man has to be in America. Like Peni Parker, a Japanese girl from America; hell, even India Spider-Man from Mumbattan, which is basically America X India, like Mumbai alone is not good enough???
huh, what are you talking about?
The fuck are you on about???
I loved Into The Spider-Verse because it tells a good story. Ironically, the character of Miles would be more accepted if the writers stopped trying so hard to force him down audiences throats, with their precious mEtA cOmMeNtArY, and instead just told a good story.
It's a shame cause ITSV had done good work to, at the very least, establish a good starting ground for Miles and even started to endear many people to his character while the comics version hadn't. Then the sequel goes back on all that and tries so hard to attack critics which will only cause resentment from them and cause them to reject Miles when many of them might have accepted the character if they just kept on developing his character.
@@coolman229but they are developing his character. It's crazy how people can accept other versions of a character as still that character bit once the race is changed it's a whole other story.
Also they did make a good story so that argument has no weight either, just admit to your bias.
@@HollowPurple-if2co
No bias on our part.
Miles's story is trash in the comics. They killed peter to insert a blackwashed version of Spider-Man.
ITSV made it make sense, gave it a sense of scale that made Miles distinct. Miles in ITSV isn't just the 'black Spider-Man'. In ITSV he was the 'rookie', the 'new guy', the 'inexperienced'. ITSV set up Miles as the Spider-Man that had to learn and grow into his role while being mentored by an older, crankier, but also wiser version of Peter (that being Peter B). There is also the fact that Peter from Miles's universe was designed (on the surface) to appear as perfect. And he kinda was. Miles's Peter was the version of Spider-Man which was meant to burn bright and quickly meaning that, as ITSV hinted, Peter was going to die *anyway!*
ATSV undid all of that and made Miles the 'black Spider-Man' again. In fact, they doubled down on it *hard* with the waste of time about the Spanish grade, the more egregious use of Spanish overall instead of letting it just be and have Miles just drop a couple words here and there, the political messaging that drove the Easter-Egg seekers mad when they saw Miles's backpack etc.
Like, I still like Miles because there was clearly a struggle on account of some of the writing team to give him something to do beyond his skin color and foreign language, which was in the form of him rejecting the idea that he's not meant to fit in. But that in and of itself reeks of woke and is also a lazy repeat of ITSV, where he didn't fit in because of his inexperience. in ATSV he doesn't fit in because the plot demands Miguel to be an asshole!
@@Wendeta-hq2cp ok you were doing good up till the atsv part.
the grade part wasn't a waist of time, that seen actually provided the main steeping stones to Miles's ark and his parent's ark in the story. the reason why they made the Spanish thing a big deal is because his parents expects him to get an A in that class because his mother knows fluid Spanish and she is of porter rican heritage. plus this is also a little connection to Gwen because she has a b in English just like miles has a b in Spanish. this also shows how much his parents wants him to succeed and want nothing bad to happen to him. this seen was the steeping stones to his parent's ark too which was to let miles chose his own path. but the main part was when the prinsible was righting miles story for him to make him seem like a desperate child wrong by society so he can get into this school he wanted to get into. this was the steeping stones to Miles's ark which was for miles to go down his own path and not letting anyone control his future.
how did i know you were going to bring up the stupid pen on his back pack. bro its just a pen, they were not trying to do anything political with that. all that did was show that he supported blm. there is nothing wrong with that. not only that but it actually shares another concretion to Gwen because she has a trans flag in her room. they both support social groups. also for the record i don't think she is trans just to get that straight. if that were the mcu or a Disney lar, they would make that the entire plot.
the plot didn't demand miles to not fit in just so Miguel can be a dickhead. he didn't fit in because what they believed in was straight up coltish. he also didn't fit in because people were telling him how his life is suppose to go. he doesn't believe in fate, the doesn't believe that our future has already been decided. plus sense he doesn't fit in that also gives him the power of unpredictability. sense everyone in the spider society thinks that miles doesn't know what he is doing end up giving miles the advantage. they never expected him to have a plan.
for me, i personally relate to miles so far out of all the other spider men/women just because of what this film did to him. and i'm white so that saying something. I like how rebellious he is and i love how in depended he is trying to be. I also like how he has more fun with his spider like abilities unlike the rest. I relate to him because that's how I am when it comes to certain topics. he stands behind his morals even when everyone he saw as friends or more try to stop him. even when he is told he wasn't suppose to be spider man, he doesn't let that change him and still says "ima do my own thing".
btw sorry for bad grammar or spelling if seen because i'm ass at those thing
@@jacknite625
Allow me to be more specific then:
The grade part was a waste of time. It's as useless as Gwen's B in English since it serves no function. One of the reasons for that is because we don't need to be told that Miles's parents want him to succeed. We know that since ITSV when, in the third act if I'm not mistaken, we had that beautiful scen where Miles's dad tells him how proud he is of Miles and how he pushes Miles because he sees his progression. That scene is so memorable and brought me to tears... Sorry, I teared up just thinking about it.
Point is, there is no new information. The movie shouldn't rehash stuff, especially considering the fact everyone and their mother has rewatched ITSV multiple times and will have all that information fresh in their minds for ATSV.
Of course, the movie does have that problem too. The writers had no idea how to fill up time, so they just rehashed old stuff.
The part with the principle is the only relevant part in terms of new information. I have nothing against that and yes, that part *does* contribute to Miles's ark since it indirectly tells us what he wants, how he wants to achieve it *and* that he is smart (this last part is again a rehash, but it's not too egregious, since we haven't seen Miles be excedingly smart all the time).
Also the pin isn't just a pin. Same with the flag in Gwen's room. The reason that this stuff being there makes the movie worse is because it makes us hyperfocused on the crappy pacing, the flat characterisation for people like Jessica, and it also makes us normal viewers aware of why they tried to bash Peter B.
Anything that woke touches turns to shit and just because it was put into the background it doesn't change it. Any writer that turns woke is embarging on a path that takes away their tallent. And that *is* a cannon event, no questions asked.
Finally, they did need to make Miguel a dick. Because Miguel doesn't normally believe in this cultish stuff. Like, I'd argue that they made him stupid on top of him being a dick and did so because they needed a more compelling villain than Spot, which wouldn't have been a problem in the first place if they had reworked Spot.
The example above is what I'm talking about when I said going woke means becoming talentless. When you try to cater to a specific demographic you tend to be less focused with stuff like story progression and characterization. And so when a talentless writer encounters a problem, their solution is to make things more complicated for themselves instead of trying to go back and change things there.
Finally, the 'imma do my own thing' with Miles isn't bad *in* *isolation.* It's because you have to tie it with Miguel's stupidity which makes it bad. Because I know Miles wouldn't have needed to go through all that if Miguel was smart. To put it simply, that moment isn't as earned as it could have been if it was handled in another way (I personally would have liked if Miles was rejected for still being green. It's a rehash, but unlike ITSV where he had to actually learn to use his powers, the conflict here would have been about him proving that he's not as green anymore. Of course I would have changed the timeline from 16 moths to at least 3 years since 16 months is way too much of a time crunch to make things work, this being another problem this movie has and from which I believe the bad pacing stems).
Also, you don't have to worry about grammar in a youtube comment section so long as you write something readable (which you did). Just make sure the bad grammar doesn't spill over in other parts of your live and you'll be good man.
Take care!
How did the Earth 42 Spider even get to Earth 1610??
In order to transport an alternate unvierse version of something you need to put it's DNA into the collider.
The only way it could have been transported is jf Kingpin and his team had a radioactive spider of their own, which I heavily doubt they did.
Maybe not the kingpin but I'm sure alchemics being a science lab has experimented Has experimented on spiders
I mean couldn't they just make their own new one? They have both spiders and radioactive materials so it doesn't feel that far fetched
The Spider could have been the one that bit 1610 Peter Parker
Can I just say that I hate multiverse angles? It's too confusing, too many plot holes, and it's basically the equivalent of kids playing and saying 'I got you! You're beat! No way, you can't beat me because now I have this power!' Why can't people just be happy with basic storytelling?
its not confusing, people just don't really think enough so they think its confusing
@@minerpvpgaming2160 Don't think enough? You're serious? Pretty certain it's the other way around. You're not thinking enough in that you want to insult people's intelligence. It's not confusing at first. It becomes confusing later due to almost guaranteed plot holes. Plot holes which never had to happen in the first place simply because greedy fans can never have enough, be happy with what they had, and creators say 'here you go. Maybe this will shut you up.'
@@jasonmaclean719 there aren’t any major plot holes, the small ones don’t effect anything it the actual story
Pretty much all of the points in the video were wrong and the only way he came to those conclusions is by not thinking about it enough or by not listening to the movie
@@minerpvpgaming2160 go back and rewatch it. And pay attention this time instead of posting to Twitter, playing COD, and having the video on as background noise. You'll understand his points are valid.
@@jasonmaclean719 I didn’t do any of those 3 thing lmao
I don’t even have Twitter
I have only one complaint about the idea of canons in the multiverse (well, okay, there is also the absolutely terrible Miles, who was completely ruined in part 2)...HOW THE FUCK CAN THERE BE CANONS IN THE MULTIVERSE?
I am so glad to see I am not the only person who walk out of the movie thinking some seriously dumb shit was put in front of my face. Also with all the Hobbie Brown dickridders out there did anyone else find him annoying as well as Spiderman India?
Hobie Brown existed purely to tick boxes. The Indian Spiderman was just annoying and a one, long racist portrayal of Indians.
Teenage white girls like them aka simps
People liked hobie cause he’s a likeable dude
32:43 Again, Miguel is wrong. We see hints of this in Gwen’s dad quitting as police captain, Peter B Parker getting back together with Mary Jane, and the universe Miles goes to at the end of the film with no spiderman. It’s part of the story because it is being set up for the next movie. WHICH, the writers of this one had already planned for in pre production before this movie ever started production.
Thanks for validating my feelings about this movie
Funnily enough, Miguel's rant is, at least partially, true. But more so for a meta reason. Marvel did killed off Ultimate universe's Peter Parker to be replaced by Miles Morales.
Just you wait, they'll try and do that with 616 Peter Parker sooner or later. Not that it matters anyway, cause Marvel comics are a fucking joke nowadays.
Don’t forget that they’re bringing the Ultimate Universe back soon, I have no doubt in my mind that they’ll do Ultimate Peter dirty in order to prop up Miles when they should be equal as characters.
@@RogueFox2185 Fortunately, I'm completely checked out when it comes to comics, especially Marvel. They can fill the pages of that upcoming series with nothing but endless drawings of Peter and Miles sucking each other off for all I care.
i didn't like that miguel was turn into a leader he felt more like a male version Madame Web but more of a stalker and was creepy at times. spider man edge of time gave spider man 2099 the character justice, this movie he felt out of character.
the love ark between gwen and miles got old and there was way too many spider man's it ruins the character of spider man character and made him be more less special i hated that. the cliffhanger was bad i feel like the movie went to the direction of miles spider man in the comics they had no clue what to do with him. for example, seeing future miles be Prowler gave me flashbacks of miles thor. it's like sony lost sight on why the first movie was successful.
Doesn't really seem like it's seen as this movie is doing pretty well
Worst part is.. the spot literally told him the same thing at the beginning of his side of the movie. But only seems to care or hurt when Miguel said it? Wow 😂
maybe he didn't believe the spot? i'm not sure why he didn't care before lol
@@danzstuff i was just like “huh, now he cares 😂?” But u could be right. Probably barely paid attention to what the spot was saying until he started goin OP lol