The Bible Reveals What REALLY Killed the Dinosaurs
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2024
- The Bible gives us a framework for explaining dinosaurs in terms of thousands of years of history, including the mystery of when they lived and what happened to them. Find out more at answersingenes....
![ถามตรงๆ กับ อาจตุพร ทำไม ประเทศไทย ใครเป็นนายก ก็โดนด่า พอออกเเล้วคนคิดถึง!!?? l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3YFLMXxBGAs/mqdefault.jpg)
Fantastic video but please do something about the obnoxious, overly loud music
Yes. It's not suppose to be a music video or a musical. Lectures don't need music. Those of us who are truly interested in this topic don't need any kind of music to hold our attention. Turn off the music so we can actually apreciate an absorb the content!
Cut out the music. It's distracting.
Totally agree
I find quite peaceful
Manners?
Eve: Amen 🙏
What about the asteroid craters??
It happens nowadays too bro.. maybe the asteroids did hit and helped with the flood story.
Noah: Amen 🙏
The earth is electrically scarred. Check out the thunderbolts project video titled “symbols of an alien sky”.
The “Flintstones” proves that humans domesticated dinosaurs.
@MajorSkepticism. I was thinking the same thing. I loved the Flintstones. Now I know why.
Good one
The Flintstones is more accurate than a textbook
Ha! Well said 😄
@@Konstuce
Way more accurate than the bible.
Imagine Adam and Eve chilling in the garden of Eden and a T-Rex starts chasing them.
Maybe that's why they were hiding 😁
According to this guy they didn't eat meat
There were no dinosaurs, they came later after humans were taught by fallen angels how to manipulate genes and create monsters. That’s why the flood came not only to destroy people but animals, too, because they all become corrupted. Today we see again happening, that’s why scripture says, as it was in the days of Noah …
Yabadabadoo
@@bloodwyvern7876 because these scientists were in the past and they saw it eating meat right?? you actually love believing w.e they tell us 🤣
This is the issue of taking the Bible, specifically Genesis, as literal history. Genesis is a poetic story with many truths, but you must be careful on how you interpret those truths. We don’t know for sure the earth was made in 6 days. And even if we take your logic here explain the stars? If God made the stars which he absolutely did, then how are there stars that are millions of light years away, meaning the light would need take talk at least millions of years to reach earth, insinuating that it’s more then a million years old at least
What is your proof that God created the stars?
@gregirwin6791 first if all there is a ton of verse in the Bible that say it😂 example: Colossians 1:16
“For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities-all things were created through him and for him”
God created everything dude😂
@@Riversandfish Scripture isn't proof, especially when humans made up the whole story to begin with.
If God "created everything", which God are you referring to? There have been millions of made up God's, and science has buried them.
@@Riversandfish Scripture isn't proof, or evidence that God created stars, or anything for that matter.
Also, which God created everything? How do you know it was your God? So you're an atheist to all other religions, is that correct?
Ok, let me take a step back here, what do you believe? I know it was my God because He is the only God
Cut the music out! The kind of people who watch this kind of content are genuinely interested in the subject matter, and we don't need any kind of music to hold our attention. It is distracting, annoying, and mind-numbing, and it interferes with our understanding and thinking about the information.
I understand that innocence and naivety are more important then the truth, so as not to scandalized the smallest of us.
Can't get pass the music
No one realistically knows KNOWS how old the earth is.
Not a soul....
Yes we do it’s apparently 4.54 billion years old.
@@jonasg.bisgaard1086agree.
Most estimates at that age.
Hmm... I got it why that atheist so much against the christian....
The atheist have a lot more sense.
Can they explain smth without the Bible? And then compare both without forcing the Bible is correct? 🙏🙏
@@jonasg.bisgaard1086 And how do you know that? Where you there when it happened 😂
@@CosmicPotato740 bro, please try and actually use at least one of your two brain cells for once, we know trough different Radiometric datings which measure the amount of radioactive isotopes in a given sample to determine it’s rough age, and radiation has been extensively studied and have proven that it decays at a constant rate meaning that it’s by far the most reliable method of dating things older than 50,000to a 100,000 years. We know the age of the earth by using this method on the moon, meteorites, and rocks on earth to come up with the most accurate estimates of the earths age to be around 4,54 billion years old with a error range of around 50 million years.
You don’t need to have been there to know what happened or how old something is, you use the environment and context clues to figure out the rough estimate of its age or what happened.
Hey, just wanted to add, can you prove anything without science and encyclopedias? And second thing, I believe he also refered to dragons. No human was here in the very begining, and the oldest ones are long dead. Nobody knows for sure. Only thing we can do is believe. Either scientists or religion
Eventually, we didn't find out what killed the dinousaurs.
A asteroid killed the dinosaurs
@@mrdirtslife2688 I mean in the video.
We Christians shouldn't have our own alt-science. Why? Because science is on our side. Moreover, this kind of hyper-literal interpretation is not "taking God at his word." It is "teaching as doctrines the precepts of men" - Matthew 15:9. It is also presenting an enormous stumbling block to any young mind who wants to know what Christianity is all about. How do we know what parts of the Bible are literal and what parts are symbolic/ allegorical? It takes a little common sense.
I hear people talk about the problem with dinosaurs being extinct now like it's a one off. And I was concerned with the same thing until I did some research (that was well hidden). It turns out they find regular skeletons of "modern" animals all the time and they discard them or put them in a crate in a warehouse and never speak of them again. And remember, after the flood we were starting back to just a few of each kind, not hundreds of different types of the same kind. So after the flood we started over with literally a handful of dinosaurs. And when animals that can get large and aggressive (not to mention a good food source), what do we as humans tend to do about them? Remember, we killed millions of bison and almost wiped them out in a very short time. Dinosaurs were slow to grow and breed and that doesn't work well around humans.
So it's gods fault then for letting them go extinct because he failed to account for that despite being all-knowing?
Jokes aside tho, genetic bottlenecks are easy to detect. A genetic bottleneck is when a population is shrunk down to near extinction. For humans that mark is in the low tens of thousands. We know that happened for some species. We know that it never happened for all species at the same time, and especially not down to 2 individuals.
the american bison wasn't targeted for destruction because they were a threat to anyone... they were killed only at the behest of the u.s. government for the purpose of gaining control over the natives who relied on them for food.
Tf are you on about? Have you even considered the geological layer those skeletons found in? Have you looked at when do scientists think x kind of animal started to exist? Because we know some animals have existed quite a long time before others. Also we killed all the dinosaurs but elephants, hippos, crocodiles and many others are still around, sounds legit
@@elalto3492 yes, our position is based on not trusting the scientific opinion on the carbon dating (which is an open system), the true interpretation of geology shows the biblical narrative true. and he already addressed your second point when he said they are big, slow, and don't fare well in a post-flood environment.
@@LordMallen1 Ok, what about other animals that lived before the dinosaurs? The bible talks about one massive extinction, which was a supposed flood, but the geological evidence shows there was 5 massive extinctions, and none of them was a flood. Also you know carbon dating is not the only dating method existing right? Oh, and where is the mammoth, or the sabertooth, who started to exist long after the dinosaurs were gone? Apparently God was still creating animals after the flood? And they were not even adapted to the "post flood environment", since they still ended up extinct. Oh, and what about the thoudands of small animals that also went extinct? They were not "big and slow", yet I don't see any archeopterix around, for example
Then there’s Nessie and Mkele Mbembe in the Congo River.
And "Champy"
in Lake Champlain
@@nickroberts-xf7oq
And Ogopogo in Lake Okanagan.
Jesus: Amen 🙏
If the dinosaurs were consumed by the flood along with all the people not on the ark, why don't we find fossils of people in the same sedimentary layers as the dinosaurs are found. That would prove your point beyond all reasonable doubt. Can you please help me understand that? Thanks.
My understanding is the flood naturally sorts out all kinds of debris by density, so the heavier debri/fossils are found in the lower layers while the lighter/less dense materials are found at the top. Kent Hovind talks about this in this 7part creation seminar, not sure which video it is but the whole seminar is worth checking out on TH-cam
@@kyle777 Ok. Then where are the human fossils in the upper layers? I appreciate your referral to another video series. However, the answer to this question should be on the tip of every creationist's tongue. I'm not trying to dispute the flood story. I simply want to point out if creationists are criticizing the dating of dinosaur fossils, they should also be discussing the dating of human remains, as well. But it does not appear there are any. Further, if creationists claim the dinosaurs walked the earth along with Noah's family, then fossil remains must exist. But none of the creationists are discussing this simple, but critically important, conclusion. They argue that dating is erroneous. They argue that the Bible proves dinosaurs walked on the young earth. But what they cannot explain, they never mention. Do you see the problem I have with this?
O because this is total nonsense.
Because dinosaurs didn't exist.
The flood made ALL of the sedimentary layers. Who knows what the world looked like when it all began? Exactly where the corpses would have ended up being buried in the same global maelstrom could have depended on numerous things. Like exactly what part of the earth began to break up first and where different species lived at the time when the Continents began to submerge, collapse and collide. If you dont believe in Catastrophic plate tectonics, then please explain how evidence of absolutely gargantuan Earthquakes and subduction jibes with the uniformitarian mantra. ?? The reality of subduction and Continental break up are not even questions, they are demonstrable facts. Facts that remain unexplained by the deep time "Theory". But very clearly defined by CPT.
Revelations 3:8 says that "one day is with the Lord AS a thousand years..." this shouldn't be interpreted as literal, only that one day to God is a huge amount of time in relation to us, not just one thousand years; do not put limitations on God. Geology and scanning the rocks around fossils we have found with radiometric dating has proven the earth to be over 4 billion years old. This is not to say that the Bible is in any means wrong, but this interpretation of scripture conflicts with my prior knowledge of dinosaurs and the earth. This also conflicts with the process of fossilization, as the bone must be completely preserved, while water decomposes the bone, leaving only a cast fossil, an imprint made by the creature that is filled up with sediment. These conditions would not be possible to form a fossil as we typically picture it. The short amount of time allowed in this scenario would not make it possible for the earth to form and bring fossils to the surface via erosion. Also, the proposition that dinosaurs simply died out of natural causes, massive creatures that basically ruled the earth in their time, just doesn't make sense to me. Thank you for your work in putting out this video, and I appreciate you trying to explain one of the greatest mysteries in Earth's history. However, I cannot agree with this.
old earth creation is most probable.
@@marcusmuse4787
How so? The same tests that date rock to 500 million years of age are dating sediment layers on 10 year old lava flows to be 250K - one million years of age.
But ask the animals, and they will teach you, or the birds in the sky, and they will tell you; or speak to the earth, and it will teach you, or let the fish in the sea inform you. Which of all these does not know that the hand of the Lord has done this? In his hand is the life of every creature and the breath of all mankind. Does not the ear test word as the tongue tastes food? Is not wisdom found among the aged? Does not long life bring understanding? Job 12: 7-12
You’re trying to explain creation yet you deny the truth written out for you simply because ‘It’s not logical’. Newsflash the Bible Dosent care about our opinion because humanity is flawed but God is perfection. So I would expect God to provide the accurate definition of the world HE created and take his word for it as he was there when it happened. Neither of us were there so we can’t try to make up our own fantasy truths about the world being billions of years.
Ken Ham never studied formal theology and therefore doesn’t know the original language and multiple meanings a Semitic language like Hebrew can carry.
Actually nobody knows the original meanings of Semitic languages. Everybody is using Hebrew of 1000CE.
Dont buy a secondhand car of this man.
Yes. I'll take it for free, just the same. Mine broke down last week.
@@brunobernardsimon dont go to the garage, pray and it will drive. 😇
I will buy his used god for the right price.
If this is all i knew about dinosaurs, i would know -1 things about dinosaurs.
Giants ate them and said... hey Taste like chicken.
Well I rode the back of a trex once…. In ark survival
I read a hypothesis, based on Biblical creationism, that the myths of "fighting dragons," might actually be based on a truth that dinosaurs were still around here and there, but eventually were wiped out. None actually breathed fire, that is a story enhancement. Air pressure was different before the flood, according to Creationists. Denser. So life forms grew larger. After the flood, air pressure was less dense, because the dense cloud cover of the "firmiment of the air" was gone, so subsequent dinosaurs who survived on the ark (perhaps Moses only took juveniles), didn't grow larger then an elephant. (Of course, all bones post-flood were not preserved) Natives deep in the Democratic Republic of the Congo identified, from pictures shown them of both dinosaur pictures in books and modern mammal pictures in books by a Creationist tea, that they'd seen a Triceratops & Brontosaurus in the depths of the jungle. The team from the Institute of Creation were hopeful of finding and filming them, but the jungle was super, super dense and something happened to force them to have to leave without finding them (it was either political or weather reasons) But remembering air pressure after the flood became less dense, the Triceratops they described was about the size of a Rhino. I was disappointed they didn't succeed when I read the report. You can look such info up at the Institute for Creation online.
Noah took animals onto the Ark. Not Moses.
If you believe this nonsense then you would also believe the novel 'Alice in Wonderland' is a true story, some people never grow up.
I'll do you one better, the serpent curse was to crawl the ground on his belly and eat dust. And he was cursed above all cattle. In the book of Genesis the serpent is described as a type of cattle. Taking a look at the Hebrew, it's referring to a large 4 legged animal. I'm not saying it is gigantic. I'm not sure the size but it's labeled a type of cattle and it had legs.
In the prophetic language of revelation a dragon is used to describe Satan, and he's also called the "serpent of old" a throw back to Genesis. I think the serpent-like creature Satan used as a medium was a dragon. Which is why he is referred to as a dragon.
And outside of the Bible, writings by Ellen G White. She is considered to be a prophet by some because she passed the prophet test. According to her, the serpent in the garden of Eden also had wings. If you've ever heard about the serpent having wings, that's who it came from originally.
But I believe the Bible is telling us that the serpent in the garden of Eden was a dragon.
1:51 *The Tyrannosaurid,The Dromaeosaurid and the Sauropod.
Good job on telling the last name properly.
Exactly. Dude is a joke
No
They were big cuddly, vegetarians, despite the horrible big dagger teeth... then the serpent came along..
Great video!
The biggest problem with mainstream Christianity is the literal interpretation of everything in the Bible. It creates all kinds of problems. You can believe in the Bible and still understand that lots of symbolism is used.
The biggest problem w/ mainstream liberalism is the symbolism interpretation of the Bible. It creates all sorts of problems.U can believe in the Bible & still understand that lots of literalism is used.
Like stars falling from the sky. No surprise that shepherds, farm hands, and even scholars of the time thought meteors were falling stars, even today plenty of people think “shooting stars” are actual stars. But the Bible does say the stars will fall from the sky. You’d think the Son of God would know better.
Jesus is the visible manifestation of the eternal glory of God < Jesus saves ) yes I take the Bible literally 🥖 the bread of life ❤️
@@houstondante777 Stars are millions of times bigger than Earth, unfathomable distances away, yet, somehow they are going to fall from the sky. According to the Bible.
@@houstondante777 Not all of it was even meant to be taken literally in the first place. That's not even up fit for debate.
There were also pictures of helicopters
There were 4 major catastrophic events over time. We also need to acknowledge the asteroic which was the size of mount everest
Ok, what about the other four massive extincions?
ken ham you are great! You are telling the truth. God bless you!
He's not teaching anything. He's spreading lies off interpretations of a 2000 year old book that isn't even fully complete. The Dead Sea scrolls show that it is a work of fiction. Just another ancient religion trying to explain away the unexplainable. Grow up..
The truth of the delusional....
I thought Job's time was before the flood, not after.
Job is the oldest book in the Bible, but I'm not sure there is any evidence it happened before or after the flood...
@@blessedwithchallenges9917
Which flood? The one that never happened?
@@JB-yb4wn so confident because a 50yr old told you to think they know what happened 1.2 Billion years ago - and you had faith to believe.
I think they might have been seacreatures,since they never have found any feet or leg bones😛
I think humans rather have evolved from some kind if frogspecies,than fish.Frogs have an amazing skill
transforming themselves to adjust to the environment.They can even evolve lungs as an example....
Dinosaurs are real. I just saw a pet dinosaur on "The Flintstones."
This is satire right? If not, I am genuinely concerned for your mental health, and you would need to seek help.
Did he say men was living in caves couple 100 years ago fml
Some still do for example......you and amazonians, veddahs, aboriginals etc
@@vmag1552 wow, we have a comedian in the comments.
It’s still people living in caves….
@@Tyrannosaurus_rex. Google it
there have always been people living in caves both in the past and now, but there have never been half human-half gorilla hybrid cave creatures, that is entirely made-up,
Fred flintstone had a bbq for all his friends t rex burgers all round
I dont know. I have my reservations. So much just doesn't make sense, anymore; especially when you break it down to its infinitesimal levels, including sin itself. Science tells us that we are not all created equal. Some of us are born intelligent, dyslexic, mentally retarded, deformed, psychopathic, schizophrenic, with both male and female genitalia (transvestite), narcoleptic, athletically gifted, with dwarfism, tourette syndrome, tall, short, strong, weak, with autism, compulsive disorders, diabetic, compromised immune systems faulty organs..... list goes on. Instincts and hormones, self preservation, and superficial preferences also play a significant role.
If our brains are hard wire to "sin", and the irrational, undeveloped or less intelligent parts of our minds lead us astray, one could agrue that our tendency to "sin" is not of our own doing, but rather the doing of the one that claims we were created in his image. What's more, why would such a superior being concern itself with the actions and habits of mankind, as well as our fate? If God is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent, what's the point in all of this if He already knows the outcome? A test to find out if we are worthy to the exclusive rights and entry into His kingdom? Really?
If the devil/lucifer, being a master deceiver and a highly intelligent being only 2nd to god himself, how can he hold Adam and Eve's disobedience against not only them, but all of their descendants as well? Did the original sin make us even more flawed beings or did he purposely dangle temptation in front of our monkey/ape like brains knowing we'd fall if ever confronted by a far superior being he also created, with a cunningly intellect only 2nd to his own? Why would he even allow this to happen? Many christian apologist have offered clarifications but as stated in the aforementioned, they still make no sense.
One could argue humans dont have a "sin" problem as much as they do a stupidity problem.
Amen! This was a great summary. Thank you!
And wrong
@@Tyrannosaurus_rex.how
@@Thatmarvelnerd353
Start learning how to read and maybe look into some books on paleoethology. Then you wouldn't have to ask so many inane questions.
thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The way I look at this & other dating controversies, especially geology is, the evidence is the same for both creationists & evolutionists, the difference is their individual World views. An evolutionary scientist looks at dinosaur bones or rock formations, & they automatically know that what they're looking at HAS to be 10s of million of years old, same with creationist scientists (yes there are many) they automatically "Know" that what they're looking at cannot be millions of years old. So, the evidence is the same for both, its a TIME problem!
The flood never happened. 24,000 animals that would’ve made it on the ark so that’s 48,000 total animals roughly. The larger predators would’ve eaten up to 10 pounds of meat a day. There was not enough food to sustain any animal on that boat for a full year
Answers in Genesis is comedy gold.
No...that title belongs to you...but it's fool's gold!
fr. It is so bad it is funny.
Perhaps the concept of time was quite different than how we measure time?!
Absolutely. A human day is measured by the rotation of the earth. A day to God could be 4 billion years. God is beyond space and time.
Perhaps you should reread Genesis 1:3-31
Ur telling me they put a t-rex on a boat and it was just chilling w some chickens and a mouse and a butterfly.
If you ever wanted to listen to a man who never mentally grew up from the age he was when he first heard these fables he was taught in Sunday school. Listen to Ken Ham explain what killed the dinosaurs.
He is a stunningly vibrant example of the Dunning Kruger effect.
Well done Ken ham and answers in Genesis! Spreading truth as always!
The trex was a vegan …..
It was not.
it might have been before the fall of man.Before the fall of man, men may have lived beside the dinosaurs, but the bible timeline only speaks of the world after the fall and that's when death entered the picture and the bible is mainly concerned with Jesus' bloodline beginning with Adam. In the beginning of day 6 all the animals were created and then humans were created 2nd. the animals, sea creatures and man kind were told to be fruitful and multiply. (answers are in genesis.) After the fall the bible begins its timeline which is more than 6,000 years according to the early hebrew translation.
Bless his heart. So desperate to prove the Bible that he explains away the reality.
Most were entirely made up during a period in 1800's coined the "dinosaur wars"!
Absolutely garbage.
Hey hey I know your probably disagreeing with this topic and that's ok, just maybe give a real reason why you don't agree with this. Also please don't bomb me with a huge angry response I'm sure your not that kind of person.
Why?
Why are you on this channel in the first place?
@@blackknightghost902 I wonder if it stands out to you that the man in the video only accepts the "evidence" that confirms his theory (cave paintings, flood legends ...) but rejects evidence that would disprove it (radiometric dating which is a technique to determine the age of the fossils)
these people are delusional lunatics
Wonderful and Biblically true answers to world wide curiosity of this dinosaur question!!!
The dinosaurs are the reptilians that were on earth before mankind … crazy theory hahahaha
You state that meat was not eaten until after the flood, but in Genesis 4: 3-5 ,it says God was pleased with Abels sacrifice of fatty portions of first born of his flock, . Does that not indicate that Abel killed the first born, which would seem a strange thing to do in the Garden?
They were not in the Garden of Eden at that point. Caine and Able was after they were kicked out. Animals were used for working the fields and for harvesting wool and things like that.
Adam and Eve were not created on day six. Adam was, Eve didn't come on the scene until sometime later after Adam named the animals.
According to some Bible First was adam and Lilith. But Lilith didn't like obeying Adam so God cast her out and I think folklore has her getting with the devil. Then that's when God sees that Adam is lonely and makes eve.
@@roylovett4052 No Adam was lonely already that's when God made women
@@Cogic thats a good assumption. But think about it . Adam wouldn't have known lonley. According to the bible God was there with Adam along with four angels and a snake that walked on four legs. In the bible God specifically mentions creating woman two times. The first both were made out of clay. The second he puts Adam to sleep and takes a rib.....yes I know I know alot about the bible, each and every one of them
@@roylovett4052 Lilith is not in the holy Bible its more like a lost book
@@Cogic I'm not trying to discourage you or your faith but look up when and were your bible was written.....just assuming it's the king James version...am I right.. then see where that bible came from...oh yeah. It's from the Roman.. then check from there....all the way back to where it originated from in Japan. Were they believe brahma who is the name of there God was born from an egg.....and about them lost books..... there's a reason why they never made it to the bible....do some research....its because if they put them books into the bible it would have discredited the Roman church and they wouldn't have had all the power they needed...did you know that even one of our president made his own bible...check it out....I'm not here to discourage or argue.....I just state facts from every position....I do believe in God but not the bible...the bible is an honorable legend. Nothing more nothing less
Dinasaur is wipe out because of the great flood
Then what happened to the sea dinosaurs they drown? And whales still with us , no logic
@@glenwatson5055 climate change
@@glenwatson5055 there are no "sea dinosaurs", dinosauria is fully terrestrial, you are thinking of marine reptiles, they likely went extinct because of the asteroid as well, as it would have created enormous tsunamis. The ash cloud that covered the earth would have cooled the oceans, killing the marine reptiles, which I might add cannot breath underwater, so they very much could drown, same with whales, which are mammals. Whales evolved from small mammalian creatures that adapted to live in the water. The "first whale", Pakicetus, evolved 50 mya, after the kt extinction that killed the dinosaurs, it was small about the size of a wolf and was also terrestrial. And one of the first true marine whales, Basilosaurus, lived 34 mya. So at the time of the extinction event that wiped out the dinosaurs, the ancestors of whales would have been small mammalian rodent creatures, that could burrow and hide underground.
And that is why I am right and you are WRONG!
And what about the other 4 mass extinctions?
Megalodon probably died from the millions of pounds of pressure and cold temperatures from the water rising really fast! Thats how!
It was not two of every kind
How much was it then?
I have pet dinossurs, no cap, they cluck, have little red crowns, and lay eggs everyday.
They are chivkens, birds are the last dinosaurs!!
You more-on! You could've said Iguana or some other type of lizard/ reptile but you chose chickens ! ...? ? ?
@@DefendersOfWomen birds are more closely related to dinosaurs than the extant reptiles
@@booqueefious2230 you know the old saying, "You learn something wrong every day!"
@@DefendersOfWomen birds ARE dinosaurs, the last dinosaurs. Birds are dinosaurs, dinosaurs are retiles, birds are reptiles.
@@Tyrannosaurus_rex. What else do you believe in thats not true? Bigfoot? Space aliens? Global warming? Grandpa was a monkey? Big bang? Earth created itself? Toothfairy? Santa? Earth is billions of yrs old? Atheism?
Spongebob is smarter than this. I was just brainwashed
I learned more from SpongeBob then I have from Ken Ham
Humans ate them, because they tasted like chickens, and you only had to catch one a year. You could put them in your giant refrigerator.
Man ate Meat because the Nephilim started eating Man and each other...
Old earther: These bones are 65 million years old.
Why?
OE: Because the dirt they are in is 65 million years old
Why?
OE: Because the bones are 65 million years old
😣
You know what Carbon Dating is?
@@alexminsky1 we have carbon dating since 1946, what makes you think that the radioactive decay of carbon 14 always was the same?
@@alexminsky1 also carbon dating only works for 60 thousand year, so no we cant even determine the age of dinosaur bones with it
Because they're found in rocks that are that old.
@@alexminsky1 Yeah, I know
Was fish an exception to the 'vegetarian' message of scripture?
With the fossil discovery of a fish eating another fish, is this an example that illustrates underwater creatures were not vegetarian and possibly mankind ate fish prior to the flood...?
I've considered that also and if you read the genesis account only humans, animals and birds ate from the land that's the description it gives of what we ate Gen.1:29,30
When God created this world, it was perfect without sin or death. God didn't create meat eater animals. Adam and Eve, also all the animals were on plant based diet. When sin came to this world, then everything changed.
The 200 Watchers, when they left their habitation and saw the daughters of the men, were beautiful they bore children to them.
"that the sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves of all whom they chose." Genesis 6:2
The leader of the Watchers was Samyaza. The Watchers taught the mankind many things.
Azazel was one of the leaders of the rebellious Watchers in the time preceding the Flood; he taught men the art of warfare, of making swords, knives, shields, and coats of mail, and taught women the art of deception by ornamenting the body, dyeing the hair, and painting the face and the eyebrows.
The whole earth became so corrupt that I can imagine they did experiments on different species of animals, so they became corrupt as well. (Meat eaters and violent) When God saw this wickedness, He decided that it must be ended.
“And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.” Genesis 6:5
Then we know the story of Noah and the Flood.
Sin entered the world and was already a fallen evil world way before the flood.happened.
People do not understand that one day from the perspective of God, is not the same as what we humans understand. 24 hours is one Day. So we need the Sun the Earth and the rotation of the Earth to understand what one day means. So when God created the sun on day 4 (Genesis 1:14-19) and Earth he created on Day 1 (Genesis 1:1-2) So... one day in front of God is not 24 Hours.
Its means something else.
What about saline and salt water fish?
answersingenesis.org/the-flood/how-could-fish-survive-the-genesis-flood/
euryhaline species can exist in all different waters including salmon,eels, flounder,striped bass etc so those would survive in any water
Noah's crazed god opened the springs of the Earth to flood the world.
All that fresh water killed the fish that relied upon salt.
Crazed god then had to recreate salt water fish, and then go upon the
land recreate all the creatures species that died in the flood - eg pigs and elephants.
@@howdydoodey3872 That's a strawman if I've ever seen one.
Thank you Ken Ham. Blessings to you n yours and ….take care of our Martyn Isles.
If Ken Ham was an atheist.
Well the Bible doest have a label on it saying hey I'm 2000 years old. So if we weren't there to see it being written then how do we even know it's older than our great grandparents?
so all the world history was invented to fool you??
The video maker is a living dinosaur.
In the beginning God enjoyed the aroma of meat cooking. God respected Abel because Abel burned animals as offerings to God. God disrespected Cain because Cain burned plant matter as offerings to God
T-Rex was a vegan? I remember seeing one of these quacks claiming T-Rex had sharp teeth just so it could bite into watermelons!
A T-Rex had enough bite force to crunch a motor vehicle and yet Creationists are claiming it was using those powerful choppers to eat watermelons???
Yeah. their bite force was 6 tons
The t. rex might’ve used them to chop down trees…
Scientists run test on t-rex fossils and it shows that they ate meat.
Creationist saying trex was vegan is downright the dumbest thing I’ve heard, Tyrannosaurus is litterly built to be the apex predator and almost perfect carnivore
@@bloodwyvern7876 Everything was vegan before the fall.
I don’t think dinosaurs are fully extinct.
birds
At first I thought this was a silly remark. But it is actually true. The "Dinosaurs" that survived are Whales, Sharks, etc. Basically all Sea life, and possibly a few others like Crocodiles. All old world creatures that endured.
Hey bees toes, I just need you to know that most ocean animals are not related to dinosaurs and Alligators/Crocodiles being dinosaurs is a outdated claim
@@bloodwyvern7876 "related" has nothing to do with it Mr. Darwin.
Fully extinct ? No. You'll find dozen of them in you closest supermarket. Check the toys department store. Especially at Xmas time.
Why do you all have so much hate, dang. 😟
Because it's bull crap and ignoring basic facts about dinosaurs without doing research
Why the music while you are talking? It's so annoying. Have to skip over those videos.
I know I wont turn anyones mind around in the comments as everyone is a devote Christan as I can see, but saying Humanity is only 6000 years old cuts our culture down in half.
We have finds that put humanity as we know it with agraculture and literally culture with a believe in a god or protective spirit above us to around 12000 years at the youngest.
Around 2000 years from the creation week to Abraham. Another 2000 or so from Abraham to Jesus and of course around another 2000 from Jesus to now, according to the Bible.
@@vampirehunter533 Yes according to a Book that has been rewritten a lot of times. Meanwhile in the mordern age humanity has found a temple that is 12.000 years old
@@dragonlord4194
Everyone's got their own interpretations and beliefs on things.
@@vampirehunter533 That isn't really an interpretation. That is exactly the opposite of scientific discoveries. They are fact checked with other sources, given to colleagues of those fields to control the claims and so on. Most scientific papers are turned down. But here the evidence is real.
@@dragonlord4194
Alright, then sure thing.
All so called evidence though for me just doesn't seem to cut it when it comes to areas such as evolution apposed to God making every species and they bringing forth continuously according too their kinds, wether one accepts the universe as being billions as apposed to thousands of years old.
Look in a layer, that we can agree is thousands of years old for their remains, you can ask God to guide with this.
Guess again. The great flood created nearly all of the "layers" in a very short amount of time. Dinosaur fossils exist for only one reason. Rapid burial. Otherwise their carcasses would have rotted to dust in the sun.
thanks
What I think is most disturbing are the lies told...the book of Job is the first book ever written and that is knowledge. If people actually read the Bible they wouldn't believe the lies told today. Very specifically God questions Job saying, "who is this who darkens counsel with words without knowledge, now prepare yourself like a man, I will question you and you shall answer me." He specifically says to Job..."where were you, when I created these things?" We weren't there! We can't say how old the Earth is without God's word...He did these things, not us. We are mortal beings that God breathed life into. We can't take a thing like carbon dating and accurately get a reading, it's already been proven and it's flawed like us. This is what happens when people believe the Devils lies. We need to understand something and that is that fact that God's word is Historical evidence and our relationship with Him is most important and when we leave that relationship, we believe lies. Our relationship with Him in the Beginning was so pure...all we knew was God. The first thing Adam and Eve saw was God a beautiful relationship and then the enemy came in and we started listening to someone else's voice, just like we do today instead of listening to Our Father's Voice. Simply put, we weren't there when HE created everything, so, we cannot say when or how long ago...unless you listen to Him.
I love all the secularists in the comments who live by faith acting like they're experts lol
That's funny coming from a non-secularist. We are fans of science and evidence based claims. You are a follower of supernatural claims backed by ZERO evidence. You don't have to be an expert to smell bullshit. Does someone need to he an expert on unicorns to NOT believe in unicorns?
@The Fading Frontier
"In the case of understanding the facts of Evolution and how it's a fact that dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago, this is because there is evidence to believe so."
This is not fact, neither can be observed, and you believe it by faith.
"If you had been born somewhere else in the world, you would have been brought up with a totally different creation myth."
This is a very poor argument. I could say to you that if you were born in the middle east you would believe Allah created the world and not the big bang myth. Even if that were true, would it logically follow that the big bang is untrue? No, it wouldn't. Bad argument.
"through radiometric dating paleontologists find out when the dinosaurs went extinct."
I know you believe this by faith.
@The Fading Frontier Ou, big words for someone who lives by faith.
Darwinian Macro-Evolution (no one really disputes micro-evolution), nor the dating of the dinosaurs, have "empirical evidence" because neither of those things can be observed. They're theoretical science. If you educated yourself, my friend, you wouldn't make a foolish comment like the Bible has "no evidence" to support it. This shows your ignorance on the subject.
"Facts do not care about feelings", is true, but facts also don't speak for themselves. All facts are subject to interpretation, there are no "brute facts". You have an atheistic worldview, you presuppose the non-existence of God, and therefore interpret all evidence in light of that pre-commitment. Any evidence for the super-natural you will dismiss as it doesn't fit the anti-supernatural worldview you came to the evidence with.
You're like the man who believes he is dead, so his family brings him to the doctor to convince him. The doctor asks "do dead men bleed?" and the man responds "no", so the doctor takes a needle and pricks his finger and he starts to bleed. The doctor says "look, you bleed". The man says "wow! I guess dead men do bleed!"
Your claim that there's "zero-evidence" for the Bible is laughably absurd, but the reason you say it is because you have a pre-commitment, like the man who believes he is dead, to an atheistic conclusion.
The Christian, of course, is no different, presupposing God in his interpretations of the evidences.
Both the Christian and the secularist live by faith, the only difference if you have convinced yourself that you are neutral and simply "follow the facts".
I am doubtful this wont go over your head, though.
@The Fading Frontier "There’s zero evidence that God exists"
It is hard to take serious someone who makes such a foolish claim. My last reply went over your head. I see no point in continuing this.
@@michaelmannucci8585 evolutionists just cant accept the fact that the geological layer time line is just made up
Haha this is awesome. We can explain dinosaurs quite easily. It’s not hard to understand. Well maybe for you but not for the rest of the rational thinking people in the world.
One problem i’ve heard with the idea that dinosaur fossils are from the flood is that the fossils would end up close to the surface, rather than deep underground. I am a Christian, by the way. Also, the person who said this was one of my professors at a Christian college I attended.
All is speculation.
@@blessedwithchallenges9917 very true! To be honest, sometimes I feel like genuine faith involves being willing to take a step back and allowing something to be a mystery.
U hv 2 be filled with the Spirit of God 2 understand the creation God is eternal He is in no rush if u look at the whole universe then u hv to admit becoz God could hv created on any planet but the earth is the only planet that can't support life so God created first huge animals to c if the earth would support humans not that God does know what He is doing but 2 learn us a lesson we should be careful what we dig out and burn out from the earth God made humans in His own image u can't see how humans invented stuff everything starts from large 2 small look at thus vast universe we couldn't even reach our own stars in our lifetime that said it all learn 4rm God an the only way is 2 knows Christ 4 He is the Word an are the reason why everything were created
I started smelling burnt toast halfway through reading this
@@retepniffirg3250 then u a slow reader 🍔🍟
If God made us in his own image, he must be as ugly as handsome, and as evil as good. This is the definition of Multiple Personality Disorder. Gosh, it is scary to think of such a powerful super-human suffering from psychological disease. Maybe he will really ends humankind with his global warming device. A pretty cool and efficient weapon, compared to Zeus who only had lightning bolts and Thor a magical hammer. Are we doomed ? Before we die, if you found out for sure that earth is the sole planet that can support life, you should send a notification to the NSF or publish your research in Nature.
And all the sea dinosaurs drowned did they but somehow we still have whales and dolphins but no megladonn but great white sharks still live ,and then their bones turned to stone but human bones don’t
There are no "sea dinosaurs", dinosauria is fully terrestrial, you are thinking of marine reptiles, they likely went extinct because of the asteroid as well, as it would have created enormous tsunamis. The ash cloud that covered the earth would have cooled the oceans, killing the marine reptiles, which I might add cannot breath underwater, so they very much could drown, same with whales, which are mammals. Whales evolved from small mammalian creatures that adapted to live in the water. The "first whale", Pakicetus, evolved 50 mya, after the kt extinction that killed the dinosaurs, it was small about the size of a wolf and was also terrestrial. And one of the first true marine whales, Basilosaurus, lived 34 mya. So at the time of the extinction event that wiped out the dinosaurs, the ancestors of whales would have been small mammalian rodent creatures, that could burrow and hide underground.
And that is why I am right and you are WRONG!
Megalodon died because orey moved and seas changed temperature
The bone to stone thing is based on how old they are.
Sharks don't have bones, they have cartilage, the only thing that isn't cartilage is the teeth.
Not sure I buy that dinosaurs were on the ark and then magically disappeared, however, I can accept that whatever land animal God himself brought to the ark - those are what he intended to save
If you can believe in a magical arc you should be able to believe in almost anything....
@@cjp1599 it took over a year to build so it's not so hard to believe, now how does the inorganic create the organic bill nye says it's a mystery so if it's a mystery then it's quite possible that God made everything but he's an atheist. Nothing from nothing leaves nothing.
baby dinosaurs possibly and the world after the flood was very different, they might have been hunted to extinction, died from disease or other possibilities.
@@marcusmuse4787 pretty sure according to the Bible man came from mud.
And the arc being all wood and that size would leak water like a sieve. Wood boats can only be so big before the wood fails...
And if God was needed to create you, then who created that god?
At some point the origin cannot be explained, why add a layer on top with zero evidence...
There are an estimated 7 million different species of terrestrial animals in the world. Granted that includes a lot of invertebrates but I’d like an explanation of how the ark held 14 million animals and all the food to feed them. Wait the ark is actually the TARDIS and Noah was the Doctor!!!
If the animals were all vegetarian why are the teeth made to tear meat or did the teeth evolved over 40 days of flood.
Sharp teeth doesn't prove it was made to eat meat. There are many other animals with sharp teeth that are herbivores like the hippo
Yeah but animals with sharp teeth eat mostly meat and hippos are omnivores@@timmycheng92
The years of the finds are WAYYYYY off according to Bible.
I absolutely love ken ham. He’s such a great man
if you got nothing nice to say, don't say it. leave him alone and believe your own garbage
@@skywarsdanielpiue if you are replying to me then I have no idea what you are talking. Ken ham is great
@@Curly4000 sorry, I don't get why it does that. I wasn't replying to you, and yes, I agree.
@@bloodwyvern7876 and don't get me wrong, my goal is not to "judge you", but by how you said that you've studied dinosaurs "all your life" it is almost like you want me to believe it
@@bloodwyvern7876 Your first statement is completely irrelevant. I don't know your age, so I'm not even able to calculate it. Listen, all you're doing is saying Ken Ham is wrong because you have different beliefs. That alone makes your argument *baseless and ignorant*. Just saying, I never stated if Ken Ham is right or wrong, and I also never stated that I believe in "religion". Don't classify it as a "religion", that is different. We're talking about the history of the world here. Also, try to think of this: Is there any evidence available to the present time in which we live in that *proves* that evolution theories of any sort are right? For example, if you were attempting to figure out if walls in your house exist, it would be pretty simple. Obviously, you can see walls, touch and feel them, break them, and more. But when you're trying to figure something out that *potentially* happened in the past, you need to make sure your methods of testing are good enough to give you accurate answers. So how do we do that? *We can't*. This is how it works: if you want to make sure something happened in the past, *you can't*. People nowadays (scientists) use machines and tools to figure out what had happened before, but you need to have *faith* in the methods and tools that you use to make sure they give you the right answer. So to put that fact in this argument, you said how you have studied dinosaurs your whole life (and I don't even know how old you are but that's besides the point) and that Ken Ham is wrong and you are right. The tools that scientists use are man-made, and not even humans know everything. We are having *faith* in the methods and tools we use to discovery things about any topic related to science, but in this case, this is where you need to have the most faith.
Carbon dating is somewhat accurate because we are able to determine what the ratio was in the unobservable past to a certain extent. However, carbon dating is not always reliable because it can be influenced by several factors such as contamination by outside sources of carbon or other isotopes, changes in the Earth’s magnetic field, and even the amount of carbon in the atmosphere at any given time.
Once they tested a old rusted nail and says it was 7 million years old🙂🙂
@@jajabozz6128 When, where, who? You have to support such claims by giving the source of this information.
@@georg7120 I saw an interview where they tested 6 different items to see how accurate the carbon dating is….they also tested one ww1 food can and says it’s 4 million years🙃😐🤣🤣🤣
@@jajabozz6128 ,,People tell a lot, you should not believe everything.
Like I would believe you
Great content however the music is distracting and makes it hard to focus please get rid of the music its way too loud and frustrating.
Great joke about The 'Flintstones' are proof we domesticated dinosaurs. 😂
Wasn't a joke, Ken actually believes this.
Whare does the idea come from that nothing died before adam sinned?
The Book of Genesis.
@@beestoe993 But where does it say that?
@@klouis1886 it is inferred, they were with God in the garden, and were made to be eternal. Even after the fall when God told them "lest ye will surely die", Adam still lived for nearly 1000 years before he died.
@@beestoe993 Inferred? Couldn't you do that with many Biblical concepts. Isn't that been a serious issue in our history?
@@klouis1886 It seems to me that when a thing in the Bible is not cut and dry that many people may have varying opinions of the actual meaning. All I can do is give you my view. I tried to explain that Adam and Eve were NOT told they would die, except that if they took of the forbidden fruit. And even after doing so they still lived for hundreds of years afterwards before succumbing to old age. To me that seems pretty clear. If they had not sinned they quite possibly may have gone on indefinitely. Does the Bible clearly state that? No, but it seems seems quite logical "in my opinion" considering what it DOES say. What do you think?
does this guy.......think?
Just, no.
the dinosaurs had to have become extinct before the flood and that's why they are not in the same strata as humans if they became extinct after the flood, we would find them in the same strata as humans are found.
There was no "flood".
Spot on! Great to hear THE TRUTH instead of all the nonsense around the earth being millions of years old....if it was that old it would be a cold empty landscape same as the Moon as the core would have cooled down before now.
I am speechless after reading this.
Who's gonna tell him?
@@elalto3492i reeaaally don't want to and i dont think one of you wants it either... let his parents do the job when he grows up
@@no494el6
Just numbed, I thought people like this were destroyed along with the dinosaurs.
One really has to go through some mental castration gymnastics to believe what Ken is saying.
Luckily we don’t need to since everything he said is fact
Well, so do we if we want to believe that everything happened by chance and natural selection.
@@rightousliving Oh no... it was a mythical fairy tale being with magical powers, there's at least a couple of hundred of them, take your pick.
@@OldMusicGuy99 The lie has many faces, the truth has only one. The proof is in the pudding, you won’t know what it tastes like until you eat it. You won’t know if the statement Jesus made about Himself is true until you accept Him into your life as Lord and Saviour. You have my word and that of millions others , the testimony of thousands who saw Him during their lifetime before and after His resurrection, the millions of healings and deliverances that still happen today in His Name, but all these won’t be able to fully convince you unless you take the step and find out for yourself.
@@rightousliving So all of the over 4,000 christian denominations around the world believe exactly the same, so they all have one face? I want to make sure because if I join the wrong denomination then I will go to hell forever. At least that's what a number of them have told me already.
The Muzak is a hindrance to the message not a help.
before the flood man was instructed to be vegetarian?!? that makes no sense,. Cain was a farmer and Adam a hunter. Cain was jealous because God liked Adam's offerings (burnt animal flesh) more than Cain's burned grains. That's why he killed him. Your premiss is wonky.
This is LOONEY TUNES - Flintstones Arecheology at its finest. It would be really funny if was not so tragic that people actually beleive this nonsense.
they are wrong about when the dinosaurs lived. There are worse things to be wrong about. like atheists - wrong in much worse way.
Explain the tragedy?
@@vmag1552 Tragedy is to have no scientific background or culture and teaching irrational things to credulous people. Religion says "this book says the truth" and nothing can be refuted. Science says "this is a theory, let's see if it can be refuted". See the difference ? No ? Of course.
It's tragic that people give all of God's well deserved credit to a crazy idea that complex and intelligent beings such as humans (God's greatest creation) once came from one cell that came from nothing and then randomly evolved into what we are today. I can't believe people think all this was an accident.
@@xo_coco_xo471 actually this was not an accident, it was an inevitability, because the Universe is infinite, so their must be infinite possibilities. And bugs for example are complex organism, that are hugely successful, but not intelligent. An organism does not have to be intelligint to be good. Humans downfall is their intelligence. Humans have evolved for along time, not by accident, but from experience and probability. Over millions of years, organisms have adapted to an enviroment and then passed their successful traits on to their offspring. This is no accident, this is evolution, but the organisms are not controlling these changes. You are wrong, there is no god.
A young kid asks the teacher: What happens to the dinosaurs?
Teacher: You stupid humans kill the dinosaurs and you have the cheek to blame the sin of killing the dinosaurs to millions of years ago.
A giant asteroid struck the Yucatán Peninsula 65-66 million years ago and caused a massive nuclear winter that blocked out sunlight which led to the collapse of the food chain, but small species were able to scrape by in the aftermath until the ejecta cloud dispersed enough to allow some photosynthesis to occur
@@Charlie94781 I don’t think I’d call it “nuclear,” but same result.
It was way more powerfull thank nukes
Hmm sounds like Mokele Mbembe in Job 40:15 KJB who Adventurer Jobe Hovkind Fortift investigates Behold Now "BEHEMOTH!": STRONGEST ALIVE! - SUPERB ACTION UNIVERSE HEROIC!
It makes sense that many of the dinosaurs died in the flood. I don't know why I hadn't thought about that before now. I wonder if some of the dinosaurs were not included on the ark purposefully because of their size and the fact that they would eat everyone. Maybe God hand selected some creatures that wouldn't join them on the ark? Only God knows, I guess. It's nice that when I have doubts about events in the bible I can look to people like Ken Ham and get that knowledge needed to understand truth better. Thank you for the video friend.
Eggs would have been taken. A lot of birds and reptiles bury eggs in compost, which heats up like an incubator. The largest egg to date is only half a meter long. That we have pix of them, carvings and casting around the world shows they were around after the flood. Soft tissues is a major proof. No carnivore till after the flood.
He couldn't explain how kangaroos, koalas & wallabies exist. He should avoid the dinosaur topic.
He studies religion. He doesn’t study science. Notice that those are 2 different things.