The Bible Reveals the TRUTH About Dragons

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
  • Were dragons real? If so, what were they? How do dragons fit in to the biblical framework? Discover the answers to these questions in an interactive workshop designed for the entire family and led by Buddy Davis. Buddy is a paleo-artist and has sculpted many of the dinosaurs here at the Creation Museum. In this workshop, he will teach you how to sculpt your own dragon head: a duckbill dinosaur named Lambeosaurus. Come join the adventure because here, there be dragons.
    Watch Answers.tv
    Answers in Genesis videos, live streaming, and more-all in one place.
    Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenes...

ความคิดเห็น • 2.9K

  • @aldito7586
    @aldito7586 2 ปีที่แล้ว +346

    I know in the Old Testament one book speaks about "The Behemoth". And the Old Testament also says that "His tail was like a tree". There is only one animal who has a tail like a tree. A Dinosaur !

    • @homevalueglass3809
      @homevalueglass3809 2 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      Yeah, my first time reading Job, my mind was blown.🤯 Had to re-read several times. Also Leviathan, which was a huge sea serpent that has flames spraying out of it's mouth. Why would the Lord be comparing Himself to these creatures that He created if they were just fictional?

    • @Bigchickens
      @Bigchickens 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      No go look up what ancient cultures believed about sea monsters and stuff along those lines.

    • @agnewb2302
      @agnewb2302 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      It was an elephant, do your research. I cant believe people in the 21st century believe that humans lived with dinosaurs. Absolutely no evidence of this but because some creationists staying so

    • @albclean
      @albclean 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@agnewb2302
      And you are here?

    • @fallenseraphdragongod-king5015
      @fallenseraphdragongod-king5015 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Behemoth is still a weakling to Dragon's

  • @stevepeterson4596
    @stevepeterson4596 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    They were called dragons cos the word dinosaurs wasn't invinted till about the 1700's I do believe

    • @mrfuzzy2954
      @mrfuzzy2954 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      1841 he said in the video

  • @bradleysmith9431
    @bradleysmith9431 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    People don't realize the word "dinosaur" was invented recently in history, about 150 years ago. So before that time, they weren't called dinosaur...

  • @jimmurihiku8009
    @jimmurihiku8009 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Everything in learned in school just went out the window.

  • @Petequinn741
    @Petequinn741 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dragons were dinosaurs . Imagine digging a field a thousand years and finding a raptor skull. Dragon

  • @Littleking1985
    @Littleking1985 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    How do we know the velociraptor walked on 2 legs? I was watching these little brown lizards we have here in Florida that came from Spain with the first explorer's but their back legs are almost twice as long as their front legs yet they walk on all fours they also have the same body shape just much much smaller. We only find the sedimentary copy of the original bone and some times the bones are so fragmented with less then 50% of a whole fossil yet they can tell exactly what it looked like and how it walked.

    • @overconfidentmegthatgetstu9120
      @overconfidentmegthatgetstu9120 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Well thats just it, it's just speculation for the most part. Take a dino like the spinosaurus, it's design has been changed around 4 to 5 times since 2000. Because every few years they find a new fossil that changes the way the dino was viewed.
      Even if we had a 100 percent complete fossil we still wouldn't know exactly how it looked like. I mean just look at a hippos bones, you wouldn't know it was a hippo if you'd never seen one.

    • @tristantimothy1004
      @tristantimothy1004 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Look up collard lizards. Native to the S/W. They stand up & run on their back legs. HARD to catch & fast. My brother & i used to catch em & sell them to pet shops. Made great pets once they got used to people. Smart too. We used long fishing poles with a slipknot snare on the end to slip over their heads. BIG heads. Fed ours raw hamburger. Normally they run down & eat other smaller lizards, bugs. The frilled lizards in Australia run upright on their back legs too. Both use their ling tails for balance when upright.

    • @Jordan-vr7ip
      @Jordan-vr7ip 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@overconfidentmegthatgetstu9120 that’s because spinosauras only has partial fragments, velociraptor in the other hand we complete fossils

    • @overconfidentmegthatgetstu9120
      @overconfidentmegthatgetstu9120 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@Jordan-vr7ip yes but even then the fossils have not been completely studied, for example in 2007 scientist ran a chemical test on velociraptor teeth as well as Deinonychus's teeth. They found out that the food the dinos ate changed as it age leading some to speculate they were not pack hunters like originally thought.
      Another study in 2007 found small bumps along some of the bones of the raptor, most likely for feathers. Even thought we know it has feathers we still don't know if they were fully covered or not. And on top of that we don't know how the feathers looked. Even in modern birds a parrots feathers are very different compared to say an Eagles.
      Yes we can speculate on how these animals looked. And even recreate them with some ammount of accuracy. But we will never know how they looked like with 100 percent accuracy. Especially not with more discoveries and tests changing how the dinosaur is viewed.
      The changes might be less drastic due to a more complete fossil being there but most dinosaurs that have existed never left fossils. And even those that did it is extremely rare to find a complete fossil in the grand scheme of things.

    • @Jordan-vr7ip
      @Jordan-vr7ip 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@overconfidentmegthatgetstu9120 most of your questions can be answered with phylogenetic bracketing. Yes we won’t know 100% but phylogenetic bracketing gives us the best accuracy.

  • @MrJimWinter
    @MrJimWinter ปีที่แล้ว

    I reckon it was just the tail end of some big lizards that freaked our ancestors out.

  • @demonology2629
    @demonology2629 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I didn't believe in dragons until I seen one in Indianapolis Indiana June 1st 2014 it was Flying high in the Cloudy Skies of Indianapolis Indiana on the west side and had long neck huge Wings on its back little arms and legs and long tail I wasn't the only one who saw that day my ex-girlfriend saw it first she pointed up in the sky and said look and I looked up and I said that's a dragon I would never lie about this ever!!!!
    Asked her what did she thought when she saw it she thought it was the end of the world I had a different perspective I thought it was the beginning of everything of a new chapter it Rewritten everything that was in my head of the possibilities of what else is real.🙏☯️🐲

    • @cetus835
      @cetus835 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      C
      L
      O
      W
      N

    • @demonology2629
      @demonology2629 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@cetus835 I would never lie about what I said and I don't care who believes me or not go seek the truth for yourself

    • @merrittfallis6544
      @merrittfallis6544 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cetus835 Well, Cetus, the guy believes in other fictional things... like god

  • @paulpetty9338
    @paulpetty9338 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very well spoken 👏👌

  • @angelinamaria1081
    @angelinamaria1081 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Scientists say dinosaurs are more related to birds

  • @new.Creation.In.Christ
    @new.Creation.In.Christ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +367

    Our native history here in New Zealand have many stories and carvings of dragons that Maori called Taniwha and they usually lived in rivers or lakes and often were pets of great cheifs who feed captured slaves to them. Really interesting

    • @truthhunterhawk3932
      @truthhunterhawk3932 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      That is interesting.

    • @calmingcrist4515
      @calmingcrist4515 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Credulous people are always interested in mythological stories

    • @jerroldjackson9827
      @jerroldjackson9827 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@truthhunterhawk3932 Lol no it's not Id would look into the Hebraic view on this 1st

    • @new.Creation.In.Christ
      @new.Creation.In.Christ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@jerroldjackson9827 We didn't have Hebrews here in Aotearoa there is a world before religion and that is told in carvings into rock art etc

    • @ThePinkBinks
      @ThePinkBinks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@calmingcrist4515 And the incredulous have no credibility.

  • @CornerTalker
    @CornerTalker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    In the Mandarin Chinese language, "dragon" and "dinosaur" are the same word.

    • @Holmesson
      @Holmesson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No, they're not. Dinosaur is 恐龙 , Dragon is 龙. Similar, not the same.

    • @titodelacerda6405
      @titodelacerda6405 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      When I lived there I showed people pictures of a Chinese dragon (like the one in Mulan, the cartoon) asking them if it was a dragon ir an old snake, the answer was always, "yes." Go figure! For them it's the same

    • @CornerTalker
      @CornerTalker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Holmesson I was misinformed.

  • @followersoflightministrypa7411
    @followersoflightministrypa7411 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Isaiah 43:20 - The beast of the field shall honour me, the dragons and the owls: because I give waters in the wilderness, and rivers in the desert, to give drink to my people, my chosen.
    This is spot on. Ive debated this many times. Great video, thank you.

  • @Tsiri09
    @Tsiri09 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    When I was stationed in England, I got the 'bug' to hunt down old tapestries and paintings of St George and the Dragon. The older pictures I found, the more the creature resembled a raptor. It could jump 20 feet, keep up with a 1200 pound horse and take one down. A man in armor, fighting that with a sword, no wonder a soldier was made a saint for killing one.

    • @bbgun061
      @bbgun061 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Probably in the hundreds of years since they were hunted to extinction, the descriptions and drawings morphed into the mythical dragons of today.

    • @darylhudson777
      @darylhudson777 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Here in America the Smithsonian has apparently accumulated a lot of Bones and other artifacts to try to keep people from knowing about them and I'm wondering where the bones of those beasts you're talkin about call the dragon in Old England where are they and are they already dug them up and said hush hush and destroyed them or stored them away.

    • @amyunick5674
      @amyunick5674 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      My favorite part of St George is he told that village the gospel!

  • @scottwooldridge8946
    @scottwooldridge8946 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    They recently found a prehistoric bird in antarctic with a wing spand of 16 to 25 feet.

  • @carenhughan4760
    @carenhughan4760 2 ปีที่แล้ว +169

    Very interesting video. There are so many creatures that we are ignorant about. It makes sense that dragons could have been dinosaurs or big reptilians. The Komodo dragon is an example of this

    • @julianjulian2957
      @julianjulian2957 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      komodo is a lizard. I don't know why you guys are so eager to call it a dragon. It's a native species in our country and we call it komodo, but you guys come in and so proudly announce to the world that it's name is komodo dragon

    • @jiwbink
      @jiwbink 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ????
      DID I MISS SOMETHING??
      KOMODO
      KOMODO.

    • @markuse3472
      @markuse3472 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@julianjulian2957 Komodo Dragons are reptiles. A lizard, yes, that, too. It's just a name, due to its size its affiliated to whatever it was ancients called dragons. Why call a turtle dove a turtle when it has nothing to do with being a reptile? It has to do with the look of its neck. Its just name, affiliated to the look of a retracting neck like a turtle. Going back to the head comment, it is without question many animals have gone extinct, some even more recent than what scientists care to admit. So, why are there dragon stories all over the planet from ancient peoples? That usually turns out to be that it's based on true accounts.

    • @_patontheback_
      @_patontheback_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@julianjulian2957 Uhhh... Dragons are also lizards?🤷‍♂

    • @iamthelaw2828
      @iamthelaw2828 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@julianjulian2957 We're eager to call it a dragon because it IS a dragon, which is also a reptile or lizard. Is English not your first language?

  • @jacobhenderson354
    @jacobhenderson354 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    What an eye opener! Dinosaurs as dragons makes total sense to me.

    • @michaelszczys8316
      @michaelszczys8316 ปีที่แล้ว

      If I was on an island and saw animal that looked like that I would not call it a dragon.
      I would call it a MONSTER !

    • @cjp1599
      @cjp1599 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And Santa Claus is real....

    • @michaelszczys8316
      @michaelszczys8316 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Santa Claus is not real, but there really was a St. Nicholas

    • @MyawMyaw01
      @MyawMyaw01 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes and the dragon eggs mentioned by the ancient people/literature were just dinosaur eggs

    • @letmetranslate4249
      @letmetranslate4249 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@cjp1599 Santa=Satan don't want you to believe he is real

  • @TeaPourSixFour
    @TeaPourSixFour 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    I love this already. It’s an answer to a prayer this morning. Even before I’ve watched it [and I will comment back once I’ve watched it ] I thank you for this because I’m deeply interested in dragons.
    •> Before I was fully a saved baptized Christ-lover/follower, Bible reader as I am now as an adult as I was as a child, for 25 years of adult life I had a multi-faceted pagan spiritual path.
    •> Interestingly, dragons are everywhere in my life, in art, school mascots, books, my studies, bearded dragon pets, and I even have a big tattoo.
    •> Today I understand the energetic meaning of them as an earthly life force and Biblically as the powerful fallen one. Today I would never knowingly worship the evil one as a Saved Christian! •> The Lion of Judah and the shepherd are my icons.
    •>In all major people groups worldwide dragons exists culturally as winged serpents, rainbow serpents, magical, majestic, either malevolent or benevolent creatures.

    • @katinthekno7
      @katinthekno7 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are a gifted writer. Thank you for your comments

  • @ThePinkBinks
    @ThePinkBinks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Considering dinosaur means “terrible lizard” yes I’d say that means dragons.

    • @giljesusseraspe9225
      @giljesusseraspe9225 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But they don't breath fire!
      And how about explaining why BATS are descibed as BIRDS OF PREY, a d lastly, the UNICORN in the bible...😅

    • @ThePinkBinks
      @ThePinkBinks 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@giljesusseraspe9225 Yes dear. I’ve seen the fossils of unicorns. Petite two-toed horse-like creatures that were technically a type of deer. Very cute. 🙂
      Have you heard of something called a Bombardier Beetle? They spit acid that bursts into flame. Dragons were the same with an electrical ignition. You can find this info if you really look.

    • @ThePinkBinks
      @ThePinkBinks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@giljesusseraspe9225 Wait, sorry. Were you under the impression that every species of dragon breathed fire? It wasn’t every species - only certain ones. Triceratops didn’t but instead sang using his whole crown to vibrate as an amplifier. Feel free to look it up. Behemoth (usually called brontosaurus although there’s an argument over that) didn’t breathe fire but was one of God’s first and most beautiful creations, peaceful and loving.

    • @ThePinkBinks
      @ThePinkBinks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@giljesusseraspe9225 The etymology of “bird” of “prey” just means warm-blooded creature with wings that hunts. To answer your question: lingual shift. That’s why bats are called birds of prey. Aeroplanes are called birds too. Is that accurate? I suppose they’re usually warm and have wings.

    • @hisnameisiam808
      @hisnameisiam808 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ThePinkBinks nice.

  • @craftingmamaberne3776
    @craftingmamaberne3776 2 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    I’ve always been fascinated with dinosaurs and I loved that you said God’s word never has changed and he told Job about something looking like one. I found this awesome to watch, and had many chuckles listening to you. Thanks so much for this I loved it. God Bless you

    • @guidedmeditation2396
      @guidedmeditation2396 ปีที่แล้ว

      I tend to believe that some Pterodactyls just may have survived until Biblical times but they don't look quite like a dragon. The dragons seen inso much Chyneze and European Lore are spiritual dragons. The Chyneze actually being a snake with wings, signifying its spiritual nature and not actual wings. Just like biblical angels in artwork signify their spiritual existence otherwise they might also have bird feet so they could land in trees like Pigeons?
      I cannot express strongly enough that there is a huge body of Occult (hidden) information about the flying snake dragons of Chynah and the European romanticized versions of dragons. It can best be simplified as a human seeking spiritual enlightenment having to slay the dragons of their personal desires and they are directly related to the snakes on the Caduceus that the medical community uses as a logo. In today's terms it may be someone with a drug or alcohol addiction, or sexual addiction. Slaying the dragon or nailing the snake to a cross has religious and alchemical connotations. For what its worth I would say that 90% of the dragon lore is symbolic of spiritual concepts and perhaps 10% being anecdotal sightings and retelling of stories of sightings throughout time which all lead to the Pterodactyl IMO.

    • @cjp1599
      @cjp1599 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gotta love confirmation bias instead of facts....

    • @fighterjetsteve
      @fighterjetsteve ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That would be Job 40:17. It also goes on to describe leviathans or large sea creatures and fire spitting reptiles or dragons.

    • @cjp1599
      @cjp1599 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fighterjetsteve and in the 2nd book of game of thrones they talk about dragons... your idea of facts is wrong....

    • @chambrick22
      @chambrick22 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dragon is a metaphorical term for the devil in the Bible

  • @anthonycorboy5122
    @anthonycorboy5122 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Everything we are told outside of God's word is a lie,its from the devil

    • @genome616
      @genome616 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Except we can demonstrably prove it and the devil is actually only a construct of the very religion you believe in, the fact you are able to instantly respond to this video that could be made and posted many thousands of miles away is a good indicator the technology works based on the same sciences that expose the false claims within the bible, nothing in the bible can be proven, our modern technology proves the science.

    • @genome616
      @genome616 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@theviperman1947 give example and evidence, PS using the bible to prove the bible is a logical fallacy therefore you need other means to show it is the truth.
      If I can categorically show several demonstrable falsities in the bible would you not agree it questions the very substance of the bible itself as the words of a infallible deity thus questioning the exitance at all.

    • @genome616
      @genome616 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@theviperman1947
      -Where is the Firmament and how do you explain what it is in relation to our blue skies and space itself, where is the large body of water above it is dividing?
      -We live on a planet in a heliocentric solar system, please remind me what the bible actually says about the Earth and it relative position in the universe.
      You see the bible was written by man in times this knowledge was not known, something we can show does not follow the bibles ideas, it is a repeat and rinse with religion over many thousands of yrs, they didn't know what the sun was so made it a god, they didn't know what volcano's were so sacrificed to the angry mountain god, as we have learnt what these are the religions disappear, this is what is happening now to yours, a massive rise in non believers and churches struggling to attract new blood as our scientific understanding exposes more inconsistences in the bible.
      The bible claims the we cannot be any older than 6,000 yrs as experts have worked out from its scriptures, yet through highly accurate radio carbon dating we can debunk that straight away and several other dating methods all lend support to each other to reinforce the methods we use.

    • @genome616
      @genome616 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theviperman1947 Again I repeat you cannot use the bible to prove the bible, what part of a logical fallacy do you not get, try prove it without referring to other passages, you cannot prove Jesus existed in the same sense you cannot prove any of the witnesses existed, entertain this for 1 minute, what if the real authors of the book made it up, added the extras in to make it seem plausible like any fiction writer does to form a convincing story and add thousands of yrs so none of it can be verified and you have a religion.
      The fact the bible makes so many claims that to that era were plausible because of the lack of scientific knowledge and to ours are easily shown to be wrong makes this scenario all the more real otherwise the words of god could not have been wrong and science would support the bible all the way but it clearly doesn't.
      If you take all the holy scriptures that exist and destroy them so nothing exists for new generations then new religions will evolve with very different versions that is proven when we discover ancient text from lost civilisations, you can see the lack of understanding of nature and how they imagined it worked, this is repeated over and over again, new religions, new versions and very different gods.
      New take all physics, biology or chemistry book and destroy all we know about them, then jump forward thousands of yrs, the same physics, chemistry and biology will be discovered over time and will remain exactly the same because the fundamental laws of the universe will not have changed, this is the biggest problem theists have, the constant reinvention of religion none of which are the same and the fact that science does remain the same shows you are backing the wrong horse here.
      You fail to answer any question I pose or provide anything I ask for for evidence, you are doing what I see all the time, refusing to acknowledge what I put forward then play misdirection, that does not do any favours for your position.

    • @genome616
      @genome616 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theviperman1947
      What I mean by using the bible to prove the bible is been misinterpreted, now the bible claims Jesus can produce miracles, there exists no evidence of this other than another part of the bible saying so, if you need to prove something then you need to find an alternative way to do so, agreeably the majority of the bible cannot be proven in this way, too much time has passed and lack of evidence so we have to concentrate on other claims of the bible that can be verified today, claims about the heavens and earth, claims about certain places, global floods etc which all should leave some very distinctive markers or agreeable scientific evidence to support them and that is where the bible starts to falter, when we look at the age of the earth, date rocks and fossils, understand how mountains are formed and the fossils of sea creatures got up into the heights of mountains and we can demonstrate the science behind it then it shows the claims of the bible are clearly wrong.
      Take the supposed global flood, where did the water come from, there is nowhere near enough locked up in the ice caps to flood all the land and where did it go? You do understand rain comes mainly from the sea in a cycle that's why the sea does not get deeper the more it rains, how come we have evidence of Chinese dynasties living right through the flood centuries before and after yet no mentions in their historic writings and paintings, you see when we start applying the real observations and geography, geology, astronomy etc to the bible it exposes its false claims.

  • @Caleb-r3s
    @Caleb-r3s 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Rest in peace to a real legend I still can't believe he's really gone. I can't wait to see you in heaven Buddy✝️

  • @gabrielverwys7183
    @gabrielverwys7183 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    14:27 The quote possibly was describing a dilophosaurus, don't let the one in Jurassic Park fool you. A full-grown Dilophosaurus grew up to 10ft tall and 23ft in length. It had a crest on its head also.

    • @marcussmith4913
      @marcussmith4913 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ever train Karate in your garage while watching Jurassic park??? probably not bro so careful who you call a Jurassic Park fool.

  • @emilydale7512
    @emilydale7512 2 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    As a adult from Australia I thank you for explaining this topic that had a question mark in the Bible for me ,( a young 81 yrs)👍🇦🇺🇺🇸👵

    • @toy5965
      @toy5965 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      God bless you old woman

    • @imapoetnuknoitthorough7568
      @imapoetnuknoitthorough7568 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Why would you say that like that 😂

    • @gottaluvlinda
      @gottaluvlinda ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m an Aussie too! But a young 47 😊

    • @zachsheffield1325
      @zachsheffield1325 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe you live to be in 81 year old or older woman!
      Then someone can say the same to you!

  • @RamrodAI
    @RamrodAI 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    In Africa deep in the Congo there is a creature the natives called Mkele Mbembe. It's supposedly a small sauropod. And other parts of Africa are also said to have pterodacytls still flying around.

    • @cetus835
      @cetus835 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah and the loch ness monster 🤡

    • @loganluck8415
      @loganluck8415 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@cetus835 nah it’s true about Mokele m’bembe, and also there are creatures in Africa that fit the description of pterosaurs. They’re called Kongamato & I believe Ropen. Also Nessie as been talked about for nearly 1,500 years.

    • @theprophetez1838
      @theprophetez1838 ปีที่แล้ว

      Merely legends with no proof.

    • @loganluck8415
      @loganluck8415 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@theprophetez1838 footprints aren’t proof? Petroglyphs & written descriptions of the beast aren’t proof?

    • @theprophetez1838
      @theprophetez1838 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@loganluck8415 No.

  • @EvaderGuy
    @EvaderGuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    Well, I’m 65 years old and I enjoyed this as if I were a five-year-old. Thank you so very much and God bless

    • @Lili-Benovent
      @Lili-Benovent 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Maybe you're in your second childhood.

    • @EvaderGuy
      @EvaderGuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Now if I could only convince my joints…@@Lili-Benovent

    • @EvaderGuy
      @EvaderGuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Deb.-. I think his presentation was intended for kids.

    • @AngieMck
      @AngieMck 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Good for you David! A kid at heart does not equate to a childlike mind. It’s okay to be light-hearted and enjoy the simple things in life. 👏🏽 I enjoyed it too and will share it with my grandchildren. May the Good LORD continue to bless you!😊

    • @EvaderGuy
      @EvaderGuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@AngieMck My thoughts exactly. Our great Grenad children and grand children need to know the truth!

  • @RAMROD1847
    @RAMROD1847 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I think this is absolutely plausible. I've often thought about this myself. Thanks for this video
    Also humans lived alongside species like the giant moa bird and the dodo which only went extinct quite recently. So have an open mind guys.
    Also I want to add that seamen back in the day used to talk about giant waves that come out of nowhere to devour a schooner. And it's only recently been scientifically proved that rougue waves are a very real existence. But back then people were skeptical or put it down to powers of a sea god.

  • @NotAnotherTheory
    @NotAnotherTheory ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I like this man, he seems so warm and nice.

  • @jimmyrox8835
    @jimmyrox8835 2 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    I've always thought everything thing in this video about dragons being renamed as dinosaur's to be true. Or close to it. Common sense. This would also explain why the ancients built megalithic structure's out of huge stone. And to some extent why they built under ground cities that were fortified .

    • @thealphanoid6160
      @thealphanoid6160 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you know God told us to eat them in genesis 9. They translate it as moving things but in Hebrew it mean reptiles. The word is Ramash.
      Genesis 9:3
      [3]Every moving thing(reptile) H7431 that liveth H2416 shall be meat H402 for you; even as the green H3418 herb H6212 have I given H5414 you all things.

    • @ticket2space621
      @ticket2space621 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      They also built regular homes too. You can't look at our skyscrapers and say we built them to protect against a giant monster. You're neglecting to consider all the suburban homes and townhouse and everything else we built.

    • @SvensktTroll
      @SvensktTroll 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ticket2space621 Yes and some live under open sky?
      What's your point ?

    • @powerofgod2232
      @powerofgod2232 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ticket2space621 Different situations this was long time ago closer to dinosaur time.

    • @matthewblasco2730
      @matthewblasco2730 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Common sense would say thus guy is wrong all the way through no evidence of dragons dinosaurs are not dragons they're dinosaurs an ppl built stone homes so they wouldn't catch on fire not for fictional creatures

  • @ultramaga81
    @ultramaga81 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Dragons are dinosaurs. Dinosaurs were called dragons. They are one in the same.

  • @kalebgonzales4009
    @kalebgonzales4009 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    For me I think the pterodactyl you speak of as a dragon is just a minor flying serpent. I believe the first depiction of the dragons you showed also existed.

    • @huskygold5319
      @huskygold5319 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think they were probably very spiritual creatures like the watchers and left before God flooded the earth.

    • @Katch.22
      @Katch.22 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@huskygold5319
      What's "the watchers?"

  • @dancingfirefly7761
    @dancingfirefly7761 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    I'm so glad you made this video!! I've been interested in dragons for some time, and was convinced they were actual creatures. As you stated, dragons are reported in cultures around the world for millennia. It can't be coincidence. Again, thank you for sharing this!

    • @richardsherman2092
      @richardsherman2092 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Płoo we qw we qwe qwe witherr !!!

    • @Gary-fq8cx
      @Gary-fq8cx ปีที่แล้ว

      Dragons are mythology. The bible is mythology. You have absolutely no evidence that these creatures existed. Not one fossil or bone. Just myths and religious stories. This guy is not good at making stuff up.

    • @syta657
      @syta657 ปีที่แล้ว

      Humans killed them.

    • @eprd313
      @eprd313 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, dinosaur bones are all around the world. Doesn't mean people co-lived with them

  • @jimmywhitlow2012
    @jimmywhitlow2012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    Legends of dragons are found among most people groups. For example, there are the stories of Bel and the dragon, the Kulta of Australian aborigines, St. George and the dragon, and of course many Chinese legends. Often, the anatomical descriptions given are consistent, even though they come from separate continents and various times. These depictions match what we know from the fossil evidence of certain dinosaurs. Thus, dinosaurs are known directly from their fossils, and indirectly from cave drawings, tapestries, textiles, figurines, carvings, bas reliefs, and many oral and written eyewitness accounts, most of which are quite old.

    • @StalkedByLosers
      @StalkedByLosers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed. I also believe this is circumstantial evidence that 'modern humans', human consciousness and civilizations are much much older than we think. I do not believe that humans are only 150k years old, and definitely do not believe that human civilization is only 5000years old. The fact that these stories might actually be memories suggests that humans go back half million years or more. In fact Hinduism says humans are 1mil+ years old.

    • @ronygomezi8480
      @ronygomezi8480 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@StalkedByLosers
      Nah, religion is all made up.

    • @StalkedByLosers
      @StalkedByLosers 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ronygomezi8480 I don't believe that anymore. Religion is just primitive. It dumbs down things and eventually scammers come in and twist it to their benefit.

    • @nickolasphillips3776
      @nickolasphillips3776 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@StalkedByLosers i believe modern humans could be extremely older than science tries to tell us, but evidence of dinosaurs living less than 1000 years ago is everywhere. But remember mainstream science says they are a myth I personally don't believe that at all I believe dragons were real and the zoologist that went through great effort in the past were depicting animals they saw or at least knew were real animals.

    • @nickolasphillips3776
      @nickolasphillips3776 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@StalkedByLosers the ideas that these are memories tho I don't believe but it's true history and that is disregarded as myth

  • @mattmccullough1093
    @mattmccullough1093 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The dragons are actually the dinosaurs they were never called Dinosaurs until they were found on American soil they were always called dragons.

  • @janwheeler87
    @janwheeler87 2 ปีที่แล้ว +265

    I'm 65 and I thoroughly enjoyed your video, I only wish my grandkids (who are young adults now) could have grown up listening to you! Very interesting and entertaining plus the best part is how you work God's creation and the Bible into all you teach AND share the plan of salvation at the end! Bravo sir, and thank you!!

    • @christianleeperrr7641
      @christianleeperrr7641 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I hope your grandkids were far removed from this lunacy

    • @Bunny-ns5ni
      @Bunny-ns5ni 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Your grandkids didn't listen to this stuff? Consider them very lucky.

    • @yoshimizudo
      @yoshimizudo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      this was a nice well put video. may the LORD JESUS CHRIST BLESS YOU ❤️‍🔥✝️🕊
      THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND EFFORT.

    • @jimmycricket5366
      @jimmycricket5366 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The Lord confounds the wise by using what the world system might call "foolish"..."Wise" here does not denote Godly wisdom but rather the conceited wisdom of the world system where there is a willful ignorance of intelligent design and thus a willful attempt to exclude a creator.
      Why exclude a creator you might ask? Well, simply because if I deny a God then I can deceive myself into not needing to be accountable to a higher power. --A Power who sees all my immoral filth that I do in private and in my mind.
      Let me tell you I know of professors at universities who are exceedingly careful to *look good* in public but behind the scenes they do the most embarrassingly filthy stuff often with the proverbial "plausible deniability."
      Science, when treated objectively, is an awesome thing. But usually those who shout loudest about how they are objective, are usually those who really take a subjective approach and have turned science into their own religion we call "Scientism".

    • @hopLight2322
      @hopLight2322 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@jimmycricket5366 has nothing to do with accountability. It literally has to do with the overwhelming evidence contrary to the Bible’s narrative of creation and geologic history. That and their are much better philosophies to live by.

  • @Drike6923
    @Drike6923 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Excellent video. I loved this guy's energy and the great information. Thanks for sharing.

    • @TrentsPolitical
      @TrentsPolitical ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Was thinking the same thing! He made it so fun to watch the Video!

  • @deborahwinston1627
    @deborahwinston1627 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I really like the show and the fun way you teach. Thankyou

  • @litigioussociety4249
    @litigioussociety4249 2 ปีที่แล้ว +209

    I liked how DreamWorks Dragons depicted several of the dragons as dinosaur like; obviously, the writers felt dragons and dinosaurs being the same thing made sense.

    • @paularosemark
      @paularosemark 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Iiiiiiiii

    • @honestchris7472
      @honestchris7472 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      The dinosaurs were long gone before man evolved, no man has ever seen a dinosaur alive.

    • @pvdiiioab
      @pvdiiioab 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      @@honestchris7472 wrong.

    • @Helelsonofdawn
      @Helelsonofdawn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@honestchris7472 ok demokkkrat

    • @jayh9529
      @jayh9529 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@honestchris7472 Eric dubay was right

  • @FerreiraDePassos
    @FerreiraDePassos 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Very nice presentation!! And thumbs up to this gentleman for the way he presented it. Super entertaining and informative! Thank you so much.

    • @oculusgounlocked
      @oculusgounlocked ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're right. This is clearly for entertainment purposes only and should not be considered factual in any way shape or manor. It's disgusting and disgraceful that such garbage is still being spread

  • @alansegger6199
    @alansegger6199 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    I have always thought Dragons were real and God confirms it as written in the book of Job for God cannot lie.

    • @lance9249
      @lance9249 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dragons are real man calls them dinosaurs now and distorts the truth about them. We don't even need the bible to tell us history tells us dragons existed so much so in Chinese culture man and dragon walked the earth together.

    • @ellenl.5581
      @ellenl.5581 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There are more reports of Dragons than there are of Caesar.

    • @wilektonyfishtanks3308
      @wilektonyfishtanks3308 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But what if that’s a lie?

    • @samiam619
      @samiam619 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But what if the person who reads the original text got it wrong? Then put it into English, wrongfully.

    • @stupidd6513
      @stupidd6513 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Circular logic

  • @tadpitre2652
    @tadpitre2652 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Jesus Christ is the only way

  • @JAYFLOPROBEATS
    @JAYFLOPROBEATS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I love this mans energy. I'm absorbing all of everything he's talking about.

  • @chriswampler1
    @chriswampler1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Dinosaurs are most definitely dinosaurs.
    The English translation of unicorn is actually a misnomer. The Hebrew word for unicorn is actually wild ox. Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance is an invaluable tool for Bible Study.

    • @pictlandpickers1171
      @pictlandpickers1171 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Unicorn could have been rhino.

    • @Lee-xn8by
      @Lee-xn8by 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Wild ox is not the original translation, beast with a horn or wild horned animal is more accurate.

    • @GEES44DC
      @GEES44DC 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@pictlandpickers1171 No. In the cultural context it was a large horned animal that was close to a wild ox; It's now extinct.

    • @ThePinkBinks
      @ThePinkBinks 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can’t remember where but I did see fossils of small horse shaped creatures with horns (or a horn) but they had two toes rather than a hoof. Unicorns used to always be depicted with two toes as well. So unicorns were real.
      I’m fairly sure if I look into the meaning of “ox” I’ll find it covers that classification of creature.
      Can’t remember where I saw it but it was in the 90’s on TV.

    • @ThePinkBinks
      @ThePinkBinks 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ah yes here we go. Ox - looks like it means two toed creatures. A bifurcated foot. That would include unicorns.

  • @twiceborn_by_grace
    @twiceborn_by_grace 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    I saw a full grown iguana on TH-cam last night and I immediately thought of how someone from biblical times would think of dragons. I had no clue that iguanas got that big.

  • @daisyl1627
    @daisyl1627 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    It is quite possible that during the ancient Grecian era, whenever people came upon these beast bones, they began calling them the word dragōn; meaning serpent. Which as everyone is knows also a reptiles.

    • @bradleysmith9431
      @bradleysmith9431 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The word "dinosaur" was invented about 150 years ago, so yes you're exactly right! Same animals but just called different names.

    • @mauricematla8379
      @mauricematla8379 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But Dinosaurs are not lizzards

    • @walter1383
      @walter1383 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mauricematla8379 No they are not, that said the name does mean 'terrible lizard'. Alligators also are not lizards as well, yet the word comes from a garbled corruption of 'el largarto' when Spanish explorers first saw them and simply referred to them as big lizards. Really the lizard shape is just the most common form for reptiles or even tetrapods in general, so not much big deal that common folks don't distinguish as much as scholars do between all those different creatures.

  • @mlindamccarthy-boley914
    @mlindamccarthy-boley914 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    What a wonderful explanation of dinosaurs 🦕 👏

    • @hackman669
      @hackman669 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Let's bring back these dragons, dinosars!!

  • @Standinginthedayinthebattle
    @Standinginthedayinthebattle 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I just love "Answers in Genesis " maybe in Heaven we can ride a dragon and play guitar for Jesus

  • @michaellauderback3470
    @michaellauderback3470 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Thank you Mr. Davis, excellent presentation I hope to see more of you. God bless you, let it be so.

  • @Wallmart5
    @Wallmart5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It makes sense if dragons were seen by so many cultures because they can fly and theoretically travel across the world.

  • @DaRealOFGDEAN
    @DaRealOFGDEAN ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Was the dragon an animal or a symbol of a nations power 🤔

  • @markporter-thechurchhistor6784
    @markporter-thechurchhistor6784 2 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    Early palaeontologists used the term dragon to refer to dinosaur like creatures before the word dinosaur was invented.For example,sir Richard Owen was an anatomist,a biologist,and also a palaeontologist(it was owen who termed the word dinosaur,meaning,”terrible lizard”,in about 1841). Some marine reptiles called “Ichthyosaurs”are displayed in the natural history museum,built by Owen,Owen was the first superintendent of the museum.Several specimens were procured for the museum in 1834 and 1838,before the word dinosaur was invented.Stamped on these specimens is”sea-drag”,which is of course short for sea-dragon.The early geologist Thomas Hawkings wrote a book in 1840 (before the term dinosaur was coined),the title was “book of the great sea-dragons.Ichtyosauri and plesiosaurs….” All the sea creatures were created on day 5 of the creation week-Genesis 1:20-23.

    • @Nehner
      @Nehner 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dinosaurs did not exist until the 1820ies
      Sources:
      David Wozney
      Wayne Grady
      Robbin Koefoed

    • @dav1djac0b
      @dav1djac0b 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dinosaurs aren’t even real. Use your brain.

    • @cetus835
      @cetus835 ปีที่แล้ว

      All of that was good onfo... until that last line of rubbish

    • @Replies.Delete.SometimesIDKy
      @Replies.Delete.SometimesIDKy ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Only a fooI says in his heart, "there is no Lord". Nuff said.

    • @justinfair5216
      @justinfair5216 ปีที่แล้ว

      What happens to all the sea dinosaurs? There are none living. But the fish survived...those obedient were preserved by God in harbouring area amid the turmoil....the dinosaurs weren't created by God, they were formed (breed-engineered) later by man to serve violent war-sport purposes...thus the whole earth was spread with violence. All dinos died in the flood, none were obedient to God's call into the ark...2x T.Rexes 2x brachioasurus and others....don't think so. There was no design in the ark to hold them. They will possibly/ probably be resurrected in the 2nd ressurection.
      Roman 8: 28-21. JB Philips version.
      18-21 In my opinion whatever we may have to go through now is less than nothing compared with the magnificent future God has planned for us. The whole creation is on tiptoe to see the wonderful sight of the sons of God coming into their own. The world of creation cannot as yet see reality, not because it chooses to be blind, but because in God’s purpose it has been so limited-yet it has been given hope. And the hope is that in the end the whole of created life will be rescued from the tyranny of change and decay, and have its share in that magnificent liberty which can only belong to the children of God!
      Amen.

  • @bengoolie5197
    @bengoolie5197 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    There is a saying that mentions that the world is constantly playing catch-up to the Church. Well, the Church has for many years (maybe centuries) celebrated the feast day of St. George the Dragon Slayer. Now, perhaps the world is starting to "catch-up" on this subject.

  • @jordanrichards7627
    @jordanrichards7627 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This was really interesting. The intelligentsia likes to obscure old ideas with Greek and Latin and call them new ideas. I think that's the case with dinosaurs/dragons, as with lots of other things.

  • @KimberlyWard-Evans717
    @KimberlyWard-Evans717 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This was wonderful, Holy Spirit filled confirmation for what Yah has been revealing to me. Thank you. Yah bless you and all who view this information. Maranatha

  • @kf9233
    @kf9233 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Never take the Bible out of context.

    • @kevin0012
      @kevin0012 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry I forgot to say it's on TH-cam

    • @jubjub8028
      @jubjub8028 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Always take the Bible literally, and out of context,

    • @iamthelaw2828
      @iamthelaw2828 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And they didn't.

  • @treasuresunderfoot7876
    @treasuresunderfoot7876 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    I always believed that Pterodactyls have the thin, flat growth on their heads is so it can act as a rudder of sorts because they lack tails like birds.

    • @nvstewart
      @nvstewart 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But they do have tails, sort of. It's connected between the legs. Moving the legs will adjust flight characteristics (just like a bird can move it's tail). It's very similar to the wingsuits people use when jumping out of aircraft where they adjust, not only their arms, but their legs as a means of control. Some Female Pterosaurs don't have a large crest like the males do.

    • @root1657
      @root1657 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aerodynamically it doesn't make much sense to put the rudder there, cause it wouldn't be very effective, and besides the females didn't have them, nor did other species, so, probably not something needed to fly. Might be more likely it's more for showing off in front of the girls.

    • @nvstewart
      @nvstewart 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@root1657 it's not a rudder, just a stabilizer, birds don't have rudders either. I never mentioned anything about a rudder...

    • @root1657
      @root1657 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@nvstewart well I was replying to the comment above that did call it a rudder, but TH-cam notifies everyone that has been in the reply chain, so it's easy to get turned around in here.... But, since you mention it, do we have a word for a vertical-ish stabilizer that turns? Cause the rear horizontal stabilizers that move are often called stabilators because they also act as an elevator.... But I don't see that head ornament being very effective at much of anything really, or I might expect to see a stronger neck to deal with the forces it would bring.

    • @nvstewart
      @nvstewart 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@root1657 the only word for vertical-ish stabilizer is rudder, doesn't matter if it is vertical, or at an angle like some aircraft have it.
      As far as the long crest effecting flight, I could see that it would effect it to a degree, especially higher speed, but I have no clue how fast these things would be able to fly. I would imagine they would be pretty slow, more like a glider, so the crest effecting flight would be minimal at best.

  • @ruthjames6138
    @ruthjames6138 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    In Australia in the 1940 lived a very old aboriginal man who remembered when dragons flew in the sky

    • @genome616
      @genome616 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Funny how there are no recent remains then of any such creature, and the ones he references from above like dinosaur era are proven to be millions to billons of yrs old. Maybe in reflection been 1940 he sees a plane flying over and been an aboriginal many of which were pretty well isolated in them days didn't understand technology of the day so they apply their own ideas of what they saw?
      Reminds me a lot of the authors of the bible misinterpreting what they observed and inventing stories, hence the sciences can now demonstrably prove the bible wrong in many key areas.

    • @ClaytonFTW
      @ClaytonFTW 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@genome616 they are proven to have radioactive atoms and interpreted to decay over millions of years.
      Remains are all over the world in the form of fossils.
      Flapping wins and stagnant plane look very different in the air.

    • @genome616
      @genome616 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ClaytonFTW so cite your evidence then and also cite where the term flapping wings were used, I am well aware of using the half life of key elements to determine the age of a rock or fossil where possible, I am well knowledged in the pros and cons of other dating methods so I will have no issue confirming your cited evidence once you present it.

    • @sethlikes2lift
      @sethlikes2lift 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@genome616 are you an atheist?

    • @genome616
      @genome616 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sethlikes2lift I am a man of science, God does not come into any conclusions nor is it an answer when we don't know, if you can produce any evidence for the existence of God that is irefutable then submit it in a paper for peer revue and see the response, so far the billions of people of different religious ideologies have not been able to do this, until then yes you may call me an atheist but the term isn't fluid yet I'm not agnostic because I move with science which is not trying to prove or disprove a God.... work that out.

  • @unarammer2003
    @unarammer2003 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dinosaur??? No such thing...there is no such thing as pre historic...IN THE BEGINNING....

  • @deniseanderson7822
    @deniseanderson7822 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Thank you Buddy, I really enjoyed your presentation❤️

    • @Caleb-r3s
      @Caleb-r3s 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rest in peace 🕊️ Buddy Davis

  • @tannergoodman8029
    @tannergoodman8029 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    this has brought me back to the faith.

  • @rjwintl
    @rjwintl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I believe the Vikings in the 7th century found a thawed-out frozen plesiosaur in one of the glaciers that probably scared the hell out of them , and they probably drew what they saw on the inside of deerskin and thought that it would make an excellent recreated carving for the bow and stern of the longships they were building !!!

    • @Mr55330
      @Mr55330 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      they saw them alive this plesiosauroids.

    • @spiralmoment
      @spiralmoment 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I believe they were probably just doing drugs.

    • @iamthelaw2828
      @iamthelaw2828 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Absolutely ridiculous. Why do multiple ancient cultures that never met, over the course of centuries and across the globe, recount hunting, fighting or being killed by dragons? But the Vikings imagined one? C'mon, man!!

    • @NaNa-qi1gn
      @NaNa-qi1gn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@spiralmoment
      😂

    • @ratha8799
      @ratha8799 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@iamthelaw2828 If you did your history you'd know that people just LOVE telling their stories. There's no doubt that bones have been found and with bones so big they need a story. It's the same with other cultural monsters like skin walkers, mermaids (those have been proven to be manatee), bigfoot, unicorns, .ect
      Humans have been great story tellers for as back as we know it.

  • @justinfair5216
    @justinfair5216 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sorry folks, but God was talking about the elephant and the whale in Job...just using descriptive poetic license. Now about salvation....

  • @onehumanity9059
    @onehumanity9059 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WE are living ON and around the bodies of great dragons NOW!
    Look in Morocco...the entire top of Africa is a dragon...Tennessee is a dragon, Canada is a dragon...CHINA is a VASTLY HUGE DRAGON

  • @aaejaebrown5889
    @aaejaebrown5889 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    There were dragons much bigger than that. You can see a petrified dragon on google earth. Check out what Roger shows on mud fossil university on youtube.he also confirms ancient writings, from the Bible & more.

    • @karamac4847
      @karamac4847 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      YesRoger is amazing!

    • @michaelcunningham8273
      @michaelcunningham8273 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I was looking to see if anyone else were MUDFOSSIL UNIVERSITY SUBSCRIBERS ON HERE! LOL HIS WORK IS EXCEPTIONAL!

    • @DavidClark-dkc
      @DavidClark-dkc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He points pictures of rocks with a feather and says it looks bit like a foot so its a giants foot. No its a rock not something biological. His whole research is pareidolia to the extreme.

    • @aaejaebrown5889
      @aaejaebrown5889 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DavidClark-dkc chemistry doesn't matter either. It's all subject to change. Boys aren't necessarily boys. Recession is not a recession as someone decided they wanted it different. And we don't really see what we see, because someone else doesn't like what is there. It's all good.

    • @iamthelaw2828
      @iamthelaw2828 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry but he is off the charts crazy. Like the other guy said, he will point to similarities in appearance and then make tremendous leaps. I believe the Bible is true but organisms the size of small countries? C'mon man!!

  • @stephensmith3708
    @stephensmith3708 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    If I remember right there are a species of Beatles that spits fire, just when I was making a commentary, then by the Creator, I do believe that there were dragons spit fire.
    Amazing isn't it?!!!!!

    • @ThePinkBinks
      @ThePinkBinks 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Was it a mix of acids that chemically combust by any chance? Never heard of the beetle but I’ll look into it.

    • @johnbrownlee5213
      @johnbrownlee5213 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ThePinkBinks it's called the bombardier beetle

    • @gracekelehar4014
      @gracekelehar4014 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      My kids just learned about a beetle that's about a half an inch that shoots fire steam if a sort out of it butt up to 65'. I think thats almost as impressive as a dinosaur.

    • @gracekelehar4014
      @gracekelehar4014 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnbrownlee5213 lol
      I didn't see this until I commented. That's the beetle I was talking about.

    • @stephensmith3708
      @stephensmith3708 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ThePinkBinks again God is an AMAZING AWESOME GOD, OORAH AND AMEN!
      Starship Troopers wasn't wrong, except the size, lol!

  • @robertslimm9319
    @robertslimm9319 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Yes, there are many stories, pictures, and accounts of dinosaurs throughout history.

    • @lance9249
      @lance9249 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Exactly dinosaurs are just dragons and they lived with men not billions of years ago the fantasy made up by men.

    • @lsmith992
      @lsmith992 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@lance9249 Thats exactly it.
      And as this gentleman says, the term dinosaur was invented in 1841 to describe the bones dug up all around the world. So what were people seeing that they described as dragons?
      My problem is that reptiles are cold blooded ie they don't do well in cold climates. They need a warm climate in order to function. I'm in the UK and the only reptiles here are small, they hibernate and are not particularly common. Sure there are some small snakes and lizards but that's all. Yet we have all these dragon stories. And they persist until the 1800s. There are stories of small pterasaurs in a Welsh village that ate the chickens and they were a damn nuisance . So they were killed off.
      I came across the Congo stories of giant long necked lizards and the bipedal creatures seen running (not jumping) across the Aussie northern territories. All current as in the last 100 or so years.There are others too.

    • @ramonbenitez1323
      @ramonbenitez1323 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I find it funny you say that since pretty much all of this is invention by men, dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago before and ape or human showed up and let’s say for the sake of argument that dinosaurs lived along side man and were as numerous as any other animal of the time, you really don’t think that at least a handful of species would’ve survived??? Either in remote areas or on islands? Don’t you think they would’ve survived until relatively recently? I mean I’m sure the romans would’ve loved to capture Trex’s, ankylosaurs or triceratops in their colosseum, or royalty and nobility would’ve kept some in their menagerie and we’d find their remains along side their other pets like elephants, lions, or dogs kept in their palace, someone somewhere would’ve tamed some and used them for labor or in wars the same way people tamed elephants to be used in wars and labor

    • @honestchris7472
      @honestchris7472 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@lance9249 dinosaurs were long extinct before man ever evolved, no man or ape has ever seen a live dinosaur.

    • @Helelsonofdawn
      @Helelsonofdawn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@honestchris7472 ok demokkkrat

  • @PortmanRd
    @PortmanRd ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No fire breathing dragons just dinosaurs. No George and the dragon or Smaug from the Hobbit. Fable, fantasy, and fiction.

  • @crazysquirrel9425
    @crazysquirrel9425 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pretty sure that those 'dragons' would eat humans and animals.
    Sea monsters would not have died during the flood.
    It is possible that some dinosaurs survived.
    I do not think that the Ark can hold all of those animals AND those big dinosaurs.
    Unless it was a DNA bank.

  • @joseph.bittick
    @joseph.bittick 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Also, the 6 winged beings flying above the Lord in Isaiah 6 are called seraphim. Which means fire serpent. And when they spoke smoke filled the temple.

    • @knightowl5512
      @knightowl5512 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I always thought those beings are so cool

    • @massoverride478
      @massoverride478 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Solomons testament

    • @bonysminiatures3123
      @bonysminiatures3123 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      6 winged beings where aliens

    • @notarized1
      @notarized1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wow yes fire serpent.. I needed to hear this....❤ Isaiah 6

  • @pamwren6866
    @pamwren6866 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Thank you, Buddy Davis!

    • @Caleb-r3s
      @Caleb-r3s 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for my childhood Buddy Davis. rest in peace 🕊️

  • @patriciathomas1252
    @patriciathomas1252 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Jesus called Satan: "That ole dragon."

    • @randyallen7318
      @randyallen7318 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Amen you got that right on the money you're absolutely 100% correct God bless you

    • @cedriceric9730
      @cedriceric9730 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      calling satan a dragon is in reference to his great pride.
      the dragon is the only animal God created proud.
      satans physical appearance is rather unimpressive.

    • @odiesclips7621
      @odiesclips7621 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh really? You heard him say that?

    • @cedriceric9730
      @cedriceric9730 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@odiesclips7621 oh? so you must have been there or else it didnt happen , no wonder atheists dont know what a woman is🤦
      no wonder!

    • @jasonlazenby8120
      @jasonlazenby8120 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are correct

  • @kaosofthe4horsemen-Redhorse
    @kaosofthe4horsemen-Redhorse 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm going to add my 2 cents in here and share.
    In revaluation. (12, verse 7)
    (And there war in heaven, Michael) (and his Angel's fought against the Dragon and the Dragon fought and his angels)
    (But prevailed not)
    (Water creature you mention) was (the great Leviathan) (READ ALL OF CHAPTER 12) This one in chapter 3
    (Great red Dragon, 7 heads, 10 horns 7 crowns) that cast 1/3 part of the stars out of heaven unto the to Earth and set to 《devour the man child》 But the woman had a place prepared for her.on Earth.
    《What it does not say here is when the women went out unto the graden) (the red Dragon followed out after her) to continually cause her (anguish and pain)
    This one still lives!!! (The great Leviathan) (a water Dragon)
    (And is (Female) (She is sleeping) but still here and (full of much evil)
    Other than this one there is another.
    (Right here in (Revaluations chapter) (12 verse 9) this is continued below.
    (I can not show you this passage because I do not remember where it is in the Bible) It's say this: ' for i do continually (breath a consuming flaming fire) as a (river of myth flows from my mouth continually). I have (scales layered) upon me as if (Dragon's Armor)
    The Bible does not mention dinosaurs anywhere. (:chapter 12 verse 9 says.) And, the (great dragon) was cast out. That old serpent, (called the Devil, and, Satan), which (deceiveth
    the whole world). He was cast out.
    This also is true:
    (The earth is so old not even the Lord can tell you the age of it, for it is so old it's age has been forgotten). Lord says:
    :(I have formed the earth for man and he shall always be upon it)
    (And besides here there is no other life anywhere in all the heavens)
    It's hard to explain and you my not want to know what I do of how thing's where. [Chapter 12 is making reference to 3 individuals presents). in this chapter besides the Captain of all angles Michael.
    You have the woman who is with child! You have the great red Dragon ten horns, 7 crowns who cast out 1/3 of the stars and followed out (after her) > (Zion) but a battle is to set forth between Michael and his Angel's fought against the Dragon
    (And the great Dragon was cast out
    Yea that old serpent called the devil and Satin) Trust me you really do not want to know::
    the more you know the heavier your soul shall become. ((You are better off not knowing the truth and believing than you are to know the truth and not keeping the law)) ( I am going to add this: [Then I shall not speak no more for a while]
    Isaiah chapter 47 verse 3
    When I visit the for thy sins, transgressions, and thy iniquity
    [ I WILL NOT MEET THE AS MAN ]
    [This is why God ask why does man wish for me to come in such a hurry.]
    Mankind expects to see a man
    [but he shall not see a man.[
    [But he shall be full of fear for what he sees.]
    [He shall be faint and shall not be able to get up from off the ground for what he has seen.] [The Woman with the] [Moon at her feet and crown of 12 stars around her head. Is 1 individual]
    [great red Dragon having 7 heads and 10 horns] is 2 individuals
    [Great Dragon yea that old serpent Devil and Satin 3 individuals.]
    [Remember this has deceive the whole world]]
    two of these are lying one speaks the truth,or perhaps two speak the truth. It does say let us create man in our image!!!
    God bless.
    A friend:

  • @ReBible180
    @ReBible180 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    (My comment is meant to be a joke.. so please pardon me).. I believe in dragons… because some days I’m so tired that I’m just draggin’ (LOL…corny dad joke!)

  • @barbarakuhn3239
    @barbarakuhn3239 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Same thing with the flood every single culture in the world has the story of the flood

  • @lizziesangi1602
    @lizziesangi1602 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    From a child the Pterodactyl has been my very favorite dragon !

    • @shinobi1kenobi75
      @shinobi1kenobi75 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Did you know that you can't hear a pterodactyl take a leak? The P is silent :)

    • @bonysminiatures3123
      @bonysminiatures3123 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      it was a flying lizard its not a dragon

    • @lizziesangi1602
      @lizziesangi1602 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@shinobi1kenobi75
      😅 A man went to a gas station and the attendant said we're all out of gas but wait right here. The attendant came back with a bee hive and the bees flew into the gas tank.
      Start her up, said the attendant. The car started. How did you do that, asked the man.
      The attendant said,
      BP

    • @lizziesangi1602
      @lizziesangi1602 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bonysminiatures3123
      And a flying lizard of tonnage is a dragon.

  • @ptonfire1
    @ptonfire1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Any thing that's talked about was real at some point,I just found out there's werewolves along with many dogmen & bugfoot in all woods. Good grief.

  • @lomax117
    @lomax117 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Leviticus chapter 11, God tells Moses what he can eat and not eat. You shall not eat the flesh of birds that walk on 4 legs. How many nerds walk on 4 legs? Pterodactyl?

  • @hybridxane
    @hybridxane 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It still seems so strange to me that these giant lizards roamed the earth. If anything, I always assumed they lived outside the Garden of Eden and died out before the fall of man. This video shoots down that theory lol

    • @spindoggytheexplorer2915
      @spindoggytheexplorer2915 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Accourding to The Bible death entered the world at the fall of man when sin entered. I find it interesting that dragons are said to have been able to fly and the punishment of the serpent was to crawl on its belly almost as though it lost its ability to fly maybe becoming dinosaurs. Pterodactyls like he said aren’t dinosaurs so it still kinda fits. Inconclusive food for thought.

    • @VoidCraftGaming
      @VoidCraftGaming 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@spindoggytheexplorer2915 Imaging the T rex with wings.... its absolutely terrifying.

    • @jasonparra5383
      @jasonparra5383 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VoidCraftGamingThe T-Rex never had wings tho…

  • @melissaparker7336
    @melissaparker7336 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I am absolutely fascinated by reptiles. I own snakes and lizards. I own my own dragon.. a bearded dragon.

    • @CJFCarlsson
      @CJFCarlsson 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      come back when you have a behemoth or an abomination.

    • @TejasGirl
      @TejasGirl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nice! Ever considered a Chinese water dragon?

    • @Lili-Benovent
      @Lili-Benovent 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Have you got one that weighs a ton, flies through the air and breathes fire?

    • @CJFCarlsson
      @CJFCarlsson 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Lili-Benovent No. I am buying. Not selling.

    • @melissaparker7336
      @melissaparker7336 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TejasGirl I would but I really don't have the space or money at the moment.

  • @tarakinsey7059
    @tarakinsey7059 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I totally enjoyed this. It was very educational and informative. Awesome!

    • @cjp1599
      @cjp1599 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Educational? Do you know the meaning of the word educational?

  • @hawklord100
    @hawklord100 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Every Church built before Victorian times in Britain is built on an ancient Dragon line, this is why when you go to Chuch in England you can feel God with you, Dragons channel the ONE Spirit.

  • @garywatson5617
    @garywatson5617 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Job 41 talks about 'Leviathan' clearly describing a Dragon.

  • @muddyboots7753
    @muddyboots7753 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Here is a guy who loves his job. Love the presentation.

    • @Caleb-r3s
      @Caleb-r3s 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Rest in peace Buddy. I can't wait to see you in Heaven

  • @rosstemple7617
    @rosstemple7617 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Your energy and love of the subject kept me interested and glad I watched. Thank you all who helped put this together

  • @HappyHermitt
    @HappyHermitt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This has crossed my mind many times.
    Thanks for bringing attention to this. It makes too much sense.

  • @jenniferturner9012
    @jenniferturner9012 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Large Giant Dragons/ fire breathing dragons do still exist, alive now. They discovered it.

  • @ptonfire1
    @ptonfire1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sorry Papa ,great vid but the animal that has best scent cell nose is crytid werewolfs & dogmen. One smell they can track u for life.

  • @kaylee8869
    @kaylee8869 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    23 years old here you did such a great job at teaching had my attention the whole time. You were very excited and I could tell you really enjoyed this very much and made me enthusiastic as well. Thank you. Kind sweet soul. Thank you.

  • @ColonelEmpire
    @ColonelEmpire 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Dragons are dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are dragons.

  • @AwTickStick
    @AwTickStick 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    “The Bible says so” is basically all I got from the title and thumbnail.

    • @bensongriff2493
      @bensongriff2493 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The Bible is God's word and it is the truth.

    • @AwTickStick
      @AwTickStick 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bensongriff2493 According to the Bible.

  • @onehumanity9059
    @onehumanity9059 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    SORRY, BUT YOU ARE MISTAKEN.
    DRAGONS WERE AVIAN...
    AND THE VIPERS AND SERPENTS ARE SO HUGE....CHECK THE WEST COAST OF SOUTH AMERICA IS A HUGE SERPENT!

  • @johngurvan8279
    @johngurvan8279 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A lizard is a lizard. A dragon is fiction. You need to be able to tell the difference by now, its 2022. There are many ways to get info nowadays, no excuse for ignorance

  • @spitflamez
    @spitflamez 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Unicorns are real too, it’s the Rhino

    • @spitflamez
      @spitflamez 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@iveseen1 They are one and the same, Europeans thought it was a made up animal.
      SCIENTIFIC NAME: Rhinoceros unicornis

    • @michelelindseth8250
      @michelelindseth8250 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Unicorns died in the great flood because " they were playing silly games" and didn't board Jonah's
      Ark. ( per Irish Rover song " the Unicorns.")

    • @michelelindseth8250
      @michelelindseth8250 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That should be Noah's Ark. Autocorrect

    • @iveseen1
      @iveseen1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Spits. I think you would need an optometrist report before that deduction. l am sure we could definately circumvent any DNA test by direct observation,being definately equine in appearance.cheers Mick.

    • @iveseen1
      @iveseen1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michelelindseth8250 l really dont think it makes much difference l think it's a story not a theory.

  • @1newearth
    @1newearth 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If I claim I have converted, but still have idols in my heart, take the name of the Lord Jesus in vain or blaspheme, forget the blessed, sanctified, hallowed seventh day sabbath of the Creator God, hate my brethren in Christ, lust after women, defraud people, covet, lie every day; have I truly converted? Should I expect to be healed? If I am healed and made whole, would not worse come upon me for willingly sinning against our Lord Jesus Christ?

    • @Spark_Iskra_z_Polski
      @Spark_Iskra_z_Polski 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lie every day?! Does God lie? The New Covenamt makes a born again have a mind of Christ so let us say: Never lie! So if you lie, you deceive yourself.
      As for the Shabat, you must read the Bible more carefully.
      And I do hope you really do not lust not only after a woman, but also do not gossip, speak evil ab your neighbour and do not envy what is his.

    • @MergedElement
      @MergedElement 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You forget no matter converted or not, you still will be judge in the end for your sins. By converting will you have a chance to be forgiven and enter the kingdom of god. Good luck buddy.

    • @ColonelEmpire
      @ColonelEmpire 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Sabbath was ceremonial Law. The ceremonial Laws were nailed to the cross. No need for keeping the Sabbath during the Church age. Jesus has FIRST place (first day of the week: Sunday) not that last place (last day of the week: Sabbath)

    • @Spark_Iskra_z_Polski
      @Spark_Iskra_z_Polski 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MergedElement You are wrong acc to the New Covenant for IF you ARE born of the Spirit, you have ALREADY been judged, shown mercy, transformed unto the likeness of Christ
      (tho you may still be a baby that needs to grow and show its true colours, just like Christ did and gave us an example, BUT since people love to DECEIVE themselves, many that CLAIM to be born of God, ARE NOT, hence the chaos),
      you were found dead but had been made alive, free from lust, etc and ARE fit to do the WILL of the father.
      One that is TRULY born of God does NOT willfully SIN, IS obedient and PROVES himself to be who he claims he is for God IS with him and blesses him through thick and thin, everywhere he goes, no matter what little errors he does. God cooperates with those that are His, and live and love the Truth.
      A bornagain person has ALREADY ENTERED the kingdom of God because he is in it, lives it and is its ambassador, for this kingdom is Christ, not flesh or blood, but righteousness, love, joy IN THE HOLY Spirit.
      The GOOD NEWS is good to those that are sinners and accept this fact, repent and await God's mercy, ie. New birth from God. Otherwise it is bad news to them for sin leads to death. Unless they are born again, they are already dead, have no life, no peace, and are SLAVES to SIN, PRIDE, LUST. Therefore, if sb professes to be born of God but watches porn or lies or cheats or steals or envies, he only lies to himself that he is alive.
      If you see a PROFESSING Christian that is not like that: you are not blessed, you are not of the mindset of Christ (which means knowing who you are and living it by bringing the fruit of the Holy Spirit. The list of this fruit is provided. It is not that hard to tick off the list, do the checkout and run for joy ... or shame.), you have judged yourself. Christ needs not judge you. You are like the pharisees of his times. Outwardly good guys, celebrating the holy days, customs, traditions, laws, but vipers inside.
      Anyone that judges other people by a different standard than God's and than himself is a liar and a spiritual perpetrator.
      I do NOT celebrate ANY PARTICULAR day, but EVERY day for every day I cherish being able to live for, with and in God. I need no more power for I grow from power to power, from grace to grace, from faith to faith, by the very NATURE of my NEW nature granted to me by God. So why should I crave anything I am not yet ready for?
      I do not celebrate the cross anymore for I celebrate RESURRECTION LIFE, not death. This is why I cannot be in any religion because most of them are anchored to death, at the bottomless sea :) I live in a Catholic country. I know the pain of religion well. It put its anathema on me :D ha ha ha.
      I see Christ reigning past the cross through resurrection, confirmation of his elevation by subjugating HIS enemies esp in 70AD, and do NOT expect ANY more new kingdoms to come for I already am in one. I do NOT expect anyone to save me, solve my problems, lead me, set goals, help me reach them, keep me fit and healthy. I already have all that in Christ and must grow up to learn how to manage what I have been born with, spirituallywise. I simply enjoy living for God with God and doing me, but because I am born of Him I am de facto doing Him according to my new natural God-given potential. I will not grow bigger than I am and have been designed to.
      And there is no need to remind myself that all the above is possible not of human, ie my, will, but of God. Because my spirit has been made one with the Spirit of Christ, I am a conqueror, a Victor, a blessed one, a beloved in Christ, through Christ, and thanks to Christ. Is there any place for ME there? Of course. The New Covenant is not a UNION of a nobody with God. It is a someone that is resurrected by God, born again, made anew. This is why I oppose those that impose their ideas on me that result from some man made doctrines that usually result from the misinformation of God's Word.
      Bless you'll from Poland 🇵🇱
      (You might now watch The Unconquered on utube)

    • @Spark_Iskra_z_Polski
      @Spark_Iskra_z_Polski 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ColonelEmpire I love your reply, esp the last sentence. Will post it on fb with your name. Thank you!

  • @shadricklarge1167
    @shadricklarge1167 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    back in 2018 right before my father passed, my sister kept seeing a pterosaur like 2 sightings , well one evening we were sitting outside when I saw something flying that looked just like a dragon, what caught my attention was the way it moved, the sound also was like gusts of winds swooshing each time the wings flapped the body moved just like a snake would in the grass, however this was in the sky, with a huge swoop of the wings and the bodys serpentine motion I would see the mass of this creature as it covered a great distance in one stride (maybe 125yards) because when it lifted it wings again it was just outside our small town limits, and with another it was a mile out by the creek. the whole time I was hollering " Is that the pterosaur? Is that the pterosaur and my sister was actually getting in her car but her oldest son was able to observe the creature with me. I haven't talked about it much because I didn't want people to think I was crazy but it just so happens that we have creation stories of these creatures and that year in particular our tribe was honoring that story. which I found to be very eerie, in hindsight, that night me and my father sat up, most of the night I made us traditional weapons he had a spear and I a bow. I thought to myself maybe the time is coming again that these things are coming back, and we are in a way warriors that fought with such beings long ago, we just wanted to share this Im Comanche Shoshone and this happened in Indiahoma, Oklahoma near the Wichita Mountains which are supposed to be one of the oldest mountain ranges here in the North Americas, oh and we have many Mopits sightings otherwise known as Bigfoot

    • @markford4127
      @markford4127 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is this JK Rowling writing this reply? Like the bible a great big fairytale

    • @Replies.Delete.SometimesIDKy
      @Replies.Delete.SometimesIDKy ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Only a fooI says in his heart, "there is no Lord". Nuff said.

    • @jaylebron777
      @jaylebron777 ปีที่แล้ว

      A prophetic vision by a boy said we will see dragons in the end of days.. along with other creatures and monsters.

  • @lightfoxv8197
    @lightfoxv8197 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    if dragons werent real the bible wouldnt have predicted one with 7 heads

  • @sebastianwallin9014
    @sebastianwallin9014 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:31, how can people not understand the definition of a saying, they wasn't talking about a Literal dragon, they are literally talking about the devil here- wich is suposed to be a evil creature, they call satan Lion, many times not just in the bible, just for y'all out there. this is different names they called the devil. to descripe him

  • @McAbee
    @McAbee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Alligators and crocodiles could be considered dragons as some can grow up to 23 feet long and weigh 2200 lbs

    • @eijentwun5509
      @eijentwun5509 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We have tamed Crocs. The Leviathan is something massive no one dares to. and they had DEADLY weapons back then..Big ones.

  • @dragonsaxophonist9082
    @dragonsaxophonist9082 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is neat. I love this explanation and it makes a lot of sense when you tie everything else together

  • @elatuscredo3880
    @elatuscredo3880 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    If you read psalm 74 it says "the dragons were given as meat to the people of the wilderness." Those are dinosaurs. Also in Job, leviathan is a dragon. It is not a water creature.

    • @homevalueglass3809
      @homevalueglass3809 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      My understanding when reading Job was that Leviathan IS a dragon because the Lord describes it as having fire spraying from it's mouth but also a sea dwelling creature because of these verses:
      It makes the depths churn like a boiling caldron and stirs up the sea like a pot of ointment. It leaves a glistening wake behind it; one would think the deep had white hair

    • @elatuscredo3880
      @elatuscredo3880 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@homevalueglass3809 in verse 25 in the original Hebrew this refers to taking flight and landing. But reading those verses altogether leads to two outcomes. 1, leviathan spewed out of it's mouth oil so hot when it hit the air it burst into flames. Highly possible. That would mean when the oil rested on the water, the deep, it would stay on fire and boil to some degree. That would have to be some hot hot hot oil. 2, God is saying leviathan as the title of species and not one in particular. Possible as well. And when He addresses leviathan as him, He's referring to the first of them all.

    • @jagdtiger9287
      @jagdtiger9287 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Leviathan could also be a very large sea alligator.

    • @elatuscredo3880
      @elatuscredo3880 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jagdtiger9287 when you read the whole chapter he can't be. Vs 25 talks about taking flight and landing down with a crash. The best conclusion is that because of the wings, leviathan would be able to swim extremely well.

    • @bonysminiatures3123
      @bonysminiatures3123 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      people of the wilderness where bigfoot