completely correct, most AAA games nowadays are just graphics so dont bother playing them at low settings. Wait a year after they are out and all the bugs are fixed. Only problem is....the only thing that is expensive nowadays is graphics cards, even monitors and nvmes are cheaper.
Playing games at 90 FPS and then going to a game that runs at 244hz. I can't even tell there was a difference if it was not for a frame counter telling me.
That’s crazy, I notice a huge difference but I can also tell when something is running 240fps on 240hz but has abysmal 1% lows because then it still feels like I’m running more of a 90fps feel
Yea beyond 60fps it's all the same to me. I have a 144hz monitor and usually just leave it locked 60hz maybe things will change once I get more capable hardware.
@@JoseCOSTA-en4vtyeah it’s funny how we get caught up in pronunciations sometimes but most of the things we pronounce in English come from other languages that they pronounce completely differently
i was sitting on a i7 930 and GTX 650 for a while when i first started being able to play devil may cry V at the crunchiest of settings wasnt great on the eyes but it was enough so i could play since then i got a 1050 to 1650 to 1070 and now i have a comfortable ryzen 5 5600 and a 4060 and feel perfectly fine with my setup for another year or 2 and even then i'll probably just replace the 4060 for a better GPU mostly because i dont wanna build another pc for till that long of a time has passed
@darkpurpleshadow3240 probably but I'm still perfectly fine with a 100 fps and 1080p monitor I haven't really used anything higher than 1080p tbf so I'm perfectly comfortable with my current set up at the moment, sure monster hunter wilds says a 4060 is recommended but I wasn't gonna play that anyway so it shouldn't spook me at all.
High fps doesnt matter for single-player games. You just need around ~90-100fps to have a "smooth" experience. Of course, the more, the better. And it pretty much doesn't matter at all for some more chill games like Elden Ring where the game itself is capped at 60fps anyways. Would recommend playing Lies of P and checking out that buttery smooth higher framerate though lol.
There is what the hype says you need and then there is what you actually need. Nothing wrong with playing Cyberpunk at a locked 100fps at 1440p Medium without RT on a $1000 build with a $230 monitor. It is a super smooth experience with my 5700X3D. Ultra high framerates are overrated. Consistency is far better than having a wildly fluctuating framerate. Having more detail makes it easier to make hits in a competitive shooter. You see the enemy sooner. I'll never go back to 1080p. But I have also tried 4k and I just don't think it is worth it. Maybe in 5 years it will be the sweet spot just like 1440p is right now. And then I'll upgrade to 4k. It is not worth going into debt for a gaming PC. And I suspect that a lot of younger people building premium PCs today, in the middle of a recession, are buying their PC on high interest rate credit. This is a terrible purchasing decision.
completely correct, most AAA games nowadays are just graphics so dont bother playing them at low settings. Wait a year after they are out and all the bugs are fixed. Only problem is....the only thing that is expensive nowadays is graphics cards, even monitors and nvmes are cheaper.
Tbh even CPUs are pretty expensive.
Playing games at 90 FPS and then going to a game that runs at 244hz. I can't even tell there was a difference if it was not for a frame counter telling me.
That’s crazy, I notice a huge difference but I can also tell when something is running 240fps on 240hz but has abysmal 1% lows because then it still feels like I’m running more of a 90fps feel
Yea beyond 60fps it's all the same to me. I have a 144hz monitor and usually just leave it locked 60hz maybe things will change once I get more capable hardware.
Nice video, subbed.
Hades is pronounced Hay-dees btw mate.
My wife always corrects my pronunciation too. Old habits...
That’s a Greek name. Probably pronounced hah-des. So his 1st part of the word was nos that bad.
@@JoseCOSTA-en4vtyeah it’s funny how we get caught up in pronunciations sometimes but most of the things we pronounce in English come from other languages that they pronounce completely differently
i was sitting on a i7 930 and GTX 650 for a while when i first started being able to play devil may cry V at the crunchiest of settings wasnt great on the eyes but it was enough so i could play since then i got a 1050 to 1650 to 1070 and now i have a comfortable ryzen 5 5600 and a 4060 and feel perfectly fine with my setup for another year or 2 and even then i'll probably just replace the 4060 for a better GPU mostly because i dont wanna build another pc for till that long of a time has passed
4060 is still good enough for almost anything at 1080p, maybe even 1440p
@darkpurpleshadow3240 probably but I'm still perfectly fine with a 100 fps and 1080p monitor I haven't really used anything higher than 1080p tbf so I'm perfectly comfortable with my current set up at the moment, sure monster hunter wilds says a 4060 is recommended but I wasn't gonna play that anyway so it shouldn't spook me at all.
High fps doesnt matter for single-player games. You just need around ~90-100fps to have a "smooth" experience. Of course, the more, the better. And it pretty much doesn't matter at all for some more chill games like Elden Ring where the game itself is capped at 60fps anyways. Would recommend playing Lies of P and checking out that buttery smooth higher framerate though lol.
200 fps minimum or I vomit
tbh even games locked at 60 fps dont look bad to me, alot of the time its just getting that at a high res and detail thats difficult.
There is what the hype says you need and then there is what you actually need. Nothing wrong with playing Cyberpunk at a locked 100fps at 1440p Medium without RT on a $1000 build with a $230 monitor. It is a super smooth experience with my 5700X3D. Ultra high framerates are overrated. Consistency is far better than having a wildly fluctuating framerate. Having more detail makes it easier to make hits in a competitive shooter. You see the enemy sooner.
I'll never go back to 1080p. But I have also tried 4k and I just don't think it is worth it. Maybe in 5 years it will be the sweet spot just like 1440p is right now. And then I'll upgrade to 4k.
It is not worth going into debt for a gaming PC. And I suspect that a lot of younger people building premium PCs today, in the middle of a recession, are buying their PC on high interest rate credit. This is a terrible purchasing decision.
Very true, the hype is usually exaggerated