SHOCK VIDEO: Boeing Jet IN FLAMES As CEO Grilled
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 มิ.ย. 2024
- Krystal and Emily discuss another Boeing plane catching fire mid flight as their CEO is grilled in Congress.
To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show uncut and 1 hour early visit: breakingpoints.com/
For support connecting your locals account, contact support@locals.com and CC breakingpointspremium@gmail.com
Merch Store: shop.breakingpoints.com/
To listen to Breaking Points as a podcast, check them out on Apple and Spotify
Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/4Kbsy61...
#news #politics #youtube
![[Watch Party] APL 2024 ใครชนะเข้ารอบ Hydra 🆚 Flash Wolves Talon 🆚 GGLive](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BvuSgyLy4hA/mqdefault.jpg)
![ความรักของยักษ์เขียว (ทศกัณฐ์) - เดี่ยว ไออุ่น [OFFICIAL MUSICVIDEO 4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yCCy-QVHqK8/mqdefault.jpg)
It's almost like letting industries regulate themselves is a terrible idea
Yeah, no one could have seen it coming, and I am sure we will learn from this and take action in the federal government to correct it any day now!
It's as bad as letting Israel investigate itself.
Small government is the key! Let the corporations harm the public all they want, then stop supporting them, and maybe they’ll stop harming the public! I’m a genius.
But, but, but... Regulation is CoMmUNIsM!!!
@@HypocritesExposd the key you said above is "then stop supporting them", let me know when that happens!
Boeing's whistleblowers are DEAD. Just an unfortunate COINCIDENCE.
And not at all SUSPICIOUS
It's not coincidence. They have been "suicided."
They just got really depressed after exposing the horrifying lapses in manufacturing at their company. Depression leads to suicidal thoughts. Seems legit.
There are no coincidences.
2 dead whistle-blowers can't be wrong, can they?
Getting a 45% raise in pay while the company you are in charge of literally goes up in flames is 100% INSANITY!!!!!!!!
Most American thing ever
What is "INSANITY" is to blame Boeing for an engine that was made by GE. They are the same engines Airbus buys from GE. This plane was 17 years old. Engines sometimes fail. Nothing to blame Boeing for here.
A Boeing Shill has entered the chat....
@@nickv4073 Regardless of whether it is a GE engine or not is completely irrelevant. And only proves that there needs to be more corporation heads under the microscope.
It's Boeings plane. Anything they attach to it is their complete responsibility. Any failure is 100% on them. Trying to shield them from any responsibility is actually INSANE!
@@nickv4073what’s INSANITY is completely ignoring a 1 year 45% pay increase while workers hve gotten a 1% raise over the past 8 years and seem to constantly whistleblowing safety concerns. Keep shilling though
So he gets paid $750,000 a week.
What. The. Fuck.
His employees have gotten a 1% raise over the past 8 years to boot
No one is worth that much!
Wonder what his tax rate is
I would really enjoy making that much money tbh
The head of Boeing needs to be in jail.
Economy Class, at the very least.
Man if I am getting paid 33 mil I'll renovate the jail I am going into.
You need to grow a brain, Boeing does not make aircraft engines
@@hansgruber2509 It's not just engines fool.
We should begin investigating since previous CEO Dennis Muilenburg, who destroy 737 max line for profit over quality which causes 2 fatal crash due to MCAS. We should not make rules that taking CEO payout and leaving mess to next guy to fix is not ok. It should have consequences and the responsibility should follows ex-CEO even after they left company. Right now, the new CEO is doing the same thing, leaving mess to upcoming CEO to fix.
Say the line:
“We’ve investigated ourselves and found no credible evidence of wrongdoing.”
*pays fine ‘without admitting guilt’*
Sounds like ireal. It's the zinist way
Imagine what these politicians would do if Boeing were a Chinese company.
Or if they didn't all have private jets.
They’re behaving like one.
China is working on a competitive product. Which raises a whole new set of questions!
@@CherryCokeNixon
so then is China the enemy or our US corpratocracy..?
You know they always make everyone out our enemies🤷♀️✌️
China would've arrested the CEOs, and rightfully so
Privatize the profits, socialize the losses. Except losses will be people dying.
As a corporate CEO and board member, people dying is not a loss since heaven or hell would have gained a new resident. Losing profits on the other hand…. Worse than death!
You Communist!!!
People dying is a personal problem. Boeing never promised to protect human life, just to create giant metal tubes with wings and hundreds of gallons of explosive jet fuel. Are you not entertained? Buy more stock!
The Necropolitics of Neoliberalism continues to metastasize across the country, while struggling Americans are routinely sacrificed on the altar of insatiable greed.
Here's to "Nothing Fundamentally Changing."
It's well past time to ban companies from buying their stock back and self-certify safety.
Exactly
So how many times you VOTED?? 😂😂😂
Ending stock buy-backs is what ended the Gilded Age and ushered in an age of prosperity for Americans.
Life was truly the best in the USA, circa 1969.
If you weren't drafted, that is ;-).
@@jonathan7249 Which politicians are pushing to ban stock buybacks and self-certifications for essential systems?
@@SmallSpoonBrigade so you didn't know it's a super simple IQ test question?? 😄😄😄
CEO looks like a guy who would call in a hit on someone
you are not wrong...
Agent 747
@@jamesverner9132
Agent "86ed"
Well, now you mention it ….
So you didn't know being CEOs, BANKERS, politicians, etc.. are favorite jobs for narcissists/sociopaths/psychopaths?? 💯💯😄😄
Hard to believe this CEO isn't being arrested. He's a literal monster.
They only arrest the rich in extreme cases.... Remember the Wall Street crash that ruined millions of lives, but nobody goes to prison.....
Don't forget the entire board of directors/Trustees . CEO is just the figurehead of a group who make the decisions together.
"It's not personal. It's business."
He's probably got a lot of Generals and military friends, given how much they make military equipment. Also there was the East Palestine rail derailment and the Norfolk Southern CEO didn't face anything but some hearings he had to go to. American CEOs probably have god complexes now because we have NEVER punished any of them ever.
Arrested for what? Are you old enough to drive yet?
The plane isn't on fire. What you are seeing is a compressor stall. This happens more frequently than you'd imagine, but because the engine is mounted to a Boeing aircraft it is getting this attention. The engines aren't made by Boeing.
Shitty journalism from krystal
This.
Oof, BP is really coming down in the quality these days. Don't even talk to someone who might know whats going on on the plane. Fuck Boeing for sure but compressor stalls have been a thing for a very long time and just something you gotta deal with on jet engines.
Nikki Haley, this u sis?
Honestly, perception at a certain point is more important than reality. Boeing deserves the scrutiny.
Just so everyone knows, the airline companies are responsible for maintenance once they purchase the plane. They have agency too. The ENTIRE industry should be scrutinized, not just Boeing.
"Maintenance" implies keeping things in the same shape it was when it rolled out of the factory. They're coming out of the factory with substandard parts that are unreported and unrecorded, parts that aren't fitted correctly, as well as counterfeit titanium and other substandard materials. To fix that, you basically need to rebuild the entire plane from nose to tail. That shouldn't be airline's job when they paid god knows what for the plane and frankly I don't *want* them trying to do it. If this were any other industry, Boeing would have basically been forced to issue a nationwide recall on all its 737 Max and Dreamliners by now.
@@Libbathegreat you are right to a point. But the airplane shown in this video is a 777-300. That has 16 years of service under its wings. So should the manufacturer be responsible for everything that happens on an airplane that has thousands of cycles on it? If they were going to continue to smear the Boeing brand. Do it with reasonable and factual failures, like the 737 or 787. Not every Boeing model has been a failure.
@bradleybell3280 it just happens to be Boeing all the time. Just saying.
@@bradleybell3280 I'm not talking specifically about the plane in the video. Also some of the shoddy manufacturing practices means that parts of the plane that should be lasting 20 years or more may give out in less time than they might be scheduled to be replaced.
Pete B does not care
I’ve never checked what kind of plane I’m flying on before I fly. I do now! This is so insane!
How do you check that?
If it's Boeing, I ain't going.
@soniavejar1 Kayak let's you filter flights by the type of plane. You can filter out Boeing. But it's hard because their planes are on so many flights.
@@soniavejar1 The aircraft assigned can change right up to the last minute, so really the only way to avoid flying Boeing is to book with an airline that doesn't use Boeing jets. Offhand, I think JetBlue, Spirit and Frontier are all Airbus. Southwest is all Boeing. Alaska is mainly Boeing. The major carriers are mixed. Your app will show the aircraft type. The monitor by the gate will too.
There aren’t many alternatives.
Looks like a compressor stall. I’m sure they returned to the airport ok. Engine issues are not Boeings fault. Boeing buys them from another manufacturer. Boeing isn’t responsible for engines especially many years later. It’s the airlines responsibility to maintain them properly.
The Boeing 777-300ER have GE engines, for the most part the GE90 seems to be a good engine but s$%t happens, bird strikes, bad maintenance, etc
Exactly, this shows how little BP knows about issues outside their normal lane. Completely ignorant of compression stalls (which are not that uncommon) and yet they report it as a plane on fire. They need to do so much better: do your research before you sensationalise!
@@tsedge99Agreed. ... but I mean, the video is literally a plane with fire on it lol
@@rudeboyjohn3483 eh, that's a little bit of a misnomer. It's the exhaust coming out of a broken engine that's on fire, not the plane itself -- it's the turbofan equivalent of a car backfiring. When a car backfires there is a short burst of exhaust on fire, but that doesn't mean the car itself is on fire.
So, who do you work for????
So if your engine blows up in your Chevy, and engines are machined in Mexico (which they are), Chevy has no responsibility?
Nice gas lighting.... But some of us have a brain....
Profits over safety! It’s the American way.
Omg ITS THE WORLDS WAY!!! are kidding with that statement. Everytime there's an earthquake in Turkey or anywhere in the world NOT named America. You have the news their showing how awful the Apts and building were built by greedy contractors and the state let them. Yet so many die needlessly because of horrible construction standards, AND YOU JUST WANT TO BASH AMERICA AHHAHAHA there's a reason your country is actually worse off than America even though we have our problems ( liberals). We are far better than most crap cou tries around d the world
All i see is he took out a hit on a whistleblower and got a golden parachute for when it hits the fan.
Well open your eyes. Theres much more dirty details that dont need speculation
You think he needs to do it himself? The ruling class and CIA know what you do on their own
If it's Boeing I ain't going!
😅😅😅
Go Up ! 👆☝👍
Boeing doesn’t have a well trained workforce because they didn’t want to pay for that workforce. To be clear, they DID have that workforce 10-15 years ago
Makes you wonder if the whole 'diversity' thing was just so corporations could save money by being 'forced' to have representation of different ethnic groups. "Our hands are tied, we HAVE to hire these people!"
It suddenly makes sense...and it's disgusting that stupidity at the cost of lives is rewarded.
Boeing doesn't make the engines.
This is misleading, GE makes the engines that Air Canada uses.
I am by no means a Boeing apologist but engine issues are not the fault of the manufacturer of the airframe.
That was part of the questioning. They use suppliers or third party vendors without proper checking or care if they are up the standards they should be. The plane is their responsibility, all of it. It’s their decision to outsource the production of a particular piece of equipment.
@@bosnianlady10 the airline selects the engines. So is General Electric suss now? They have been in the business for decades.
The questioning was about Spirit Aerosystems.
@@bosnianlady10 this fire is a compressor stall that happens to all turbofan engines at some point pretty regularly and isnt actually dangerous. As was pointed out, Boeing does not make engines at all and those are chosen by the airlines among available options so showing this video here has no relation to the congressional hearing. Boeing has plenty plenty issues, but this is not one of them.
@timothybogle1461 this is true. GE is sus tho. That's where all these criminal CEOs got their start
@@clovis86 Further the airline maintains the engine. The media is so stupid when it comes to airplanes, these two are no exception/
Boeing doesn't manufacture engines. Boeing doesn't do maintenance on engines. What you're looking at is a compressor surge and it happens quite often. It has nothing to do with who made the airplane and has more to do with atmospheric conditions and maybe engine maintenance (by the airline or specialized shops).
My first thought as well was Boeing doesn’t make that lol
This.
Zero journalism @BreakingPoints…
You know, we USED to consider it to be the ethical thing to take responsibility for the workers, people, and machines under our care if we're in leadership. Even if we were in bed, asleep, and say, one of our workers caused a disaster in a warehouse. The right thing was always considered to step up and say that as the one ultimately in charge, you take responsibility. Now the modern american attitude is to avoid any responsibility at all costs and to shift blame if at all possible. And even when we're not part of that system we go our of our way to aid in the shifting of blame or responsibility through pedantry.
Nonsense. It’s a literal Boeing plane, they’re responsible for each part in it no matter where they sourced it from.
It isn’t just planes. Currently there are two astronauts on the space station, peeing their spacesuits wondering whether the Starliner capsule can safely return them to earth.
Doubtful
Would they be peeing their spacesuits if Lockheed built the capsule? Space travel isn't exactly low risk.
Exactly, I hope those two astronauts are not ending up dead like the whistleblowers !
@@lindafukuyu5767 Please take a long walk off a short pier.
@@ajohnson9630But why? She'll just fall into the water. This only works if she can't swim.
He gets 33M a year because he makes shareholders money hand over fist. It has nothing to do with quality and safety.
It has everything to do with quality and safety. You make profits the priority over quality and safety. Instead of spending money where an ethical and responsible company should, you give all the money to yourself and the stockholders. Corporate greed at it’s finest.
And this is a reason why we need to properly tax the wealthiest and need to stop rubber stamping mergers. A lot of this is happening because MD execs wound up bringing their diseased corporate culture over and infecting Boeing.
@@certifiedskeptic8408 that’s what I said. The reason he makes the big bucks like most CEOs has only to do with pamping the stock price and creating shareholder value. Not for safety, quality, being a member of your community, supporting your employees. Just about maximizing shareholder value. The better they can do that the more the CEO is valued. We’ve lost all sight of reason for corporations.
$66 dollars per second 24/7/365.
If Boeing self-certifies their own planes that also means they own ALL the blame. So sue them into oblivion.
You know that CEO only flies in an Airbus
if only, they got private jets
@@usun_politics1033 so Gulfstream then
The plane was NOT on fire. This is called an engine surge. If the air flowing into the engine is interrupted the engine with surge or backfire It can happen to any plane with jet engines which means Airbus experiences the exact same issue multiple times. When you have a news correspondent who is clueless and fixated on Boeing bashing and fear the public is exposed to this unprofessional news cast. I’m not dismissing Boeing horrendous actions but this particular incident has absolutely nothing to do with the plane manufacturer
Boeing deserves all the criticism it gets, its mismanagement has literally killed people, but the engine had a compressor stall which, while it looks scary, is not THAT uncommon and is a situation pilots are trained to handle. Boeing doesn't even manufacture the engines (it was probably either pratt and whitney or rolls royce) and there have been incidents recently with Airbus planes too, like the Spirit flight where they told passengers to brace for an emergency water landing over the ocean. The whistleblowers who were silenced, all the corruption and greed within management and the FAA, it deserves our all the criticism in the world, people should be in jail, it certainly contributed/caused door plug issue and MAX crashes, but it did not cause this compressor stall, and this is not a story that needs to be covered.
Right, but if they hadn't already blown their reputation for quality, they probably wouldn't be getting this kind of scrutiny over something like this.
@@SmallSpoonBrigade Right, I guess this comment is more directed towards Breaking Points. They should focus and spend time on the things that really matter.
Since compressor stalls are not unheard of, the real story is how Boeing handled it afterwards in the context of their ongoing negligence. Did they adequately secure any potential engine damage as a result of whatever caused the stall. On a separate note, if something is found to be faulty with an engine, just because Boeing didn't manufacture the engine doesn't mean that the public will hold them harmless....just as much as the public will not tolerate a Grocery Store stocking their shelves with expired or recalled food. Public expectation is that if Boeing is aware of engine issues that they do their due diligence in correcting the issue.
@@ACivilBeast If Boeing knowingly SOLD a plane with a faulty engine then that's a massive breach of ethics. Engine/plane MAINTENANCE is the responsibility of the airline. I don't know the details of this incident, but even engines that are manufactured and maintained properly can have compressor stalls, and they do not pose a serious safety risk as long as pilots are properly trained. As far as I know compressor stalls are not happening at a higher rate on Boeing planes than others.
Regardless of what kind of issue it is, I’m still not flying Boeing. Even if they didn’t manufacture the engine, they still bought and installed it… they’re putting profit over passenger safety.
Hey bud, these are the same engines that Airbus buys from GE. Nothing is 100% foolproof. Engines fail sometimes. Thats a fact. I'm not a Boeing fan but you can't blame Boeing for this one.
this is called a compressor stall. it has nothing to do with Boeing. engines on this plane are made by ge. edit: for all those still trying to blame this on Boeing.. this plane is 17 years old. no engine lasts on a plane that long, therefore this plane was flying with new engines that were not put on by Boeing. also, and very importantly, engine flame outs are not as rare as you may think and happen with all types of jet engines. no part is perfect, that is why planes have multiple redundancies.. in this case another engine to take the plane safely to the ground.
But they added it to their plane and with quality and safety problems it's obvious they selected a bad part, so it's their own fault and they are guilty .
They should have tested it. Plain and simple.
@@dbptwgit wasn’t a new engine, these things happen on all jets, even with proper maintenance. Not saying Boeing isn’t guilty and terrible quality (they are), this just isn’t an example of it
As a former pilot I can say that things break. There are massive checklists that pilots complete before leaving the gate and they continue during the taxi stage. Airliners have at least two engines for a reason. The plane kept flying as it was designed to do. It is impossible to test every component before takeoff.
Also, maintenance is up to the airline company. The airline companies also choose the engine package.
@peterjobalom206 It looked like a bird strike to me.
That engine fire is more than likely a maintenance issue and has nothing to do with Boeing. You should get your facts straight. Boeing has nothing to do with maintenance on an aircraft in service with an airline. Boeing doesn't have anything to do with the engines except installation on the aircraft
Flying to my moms Funeral next week, wish me luck boys.
I'm sorry for your loss 🪽
Hope you don't meet her ! Blessings
Hindenburg spox as it went up in flames. "A slight overheating in the rear of the dirigible is what we're looking at at the moment. It should be fine, should sort itself out shortly here."
"We are intent on acquiring our hydrogen supplier to ensure that this never happens again" 😂
Boeing doesn't build engines ! GE and Rolls Royce do tho
Does the military get the good parts and civilians get the crap? 😂
HAHAHA, if you only knew how bad the military parts are
Boeing is gonna contract Agent 47 for a few more it looks like.
That's a silly take on the engine failure. Given how jet engines work and where they are located it's pretty evident that's exactly what this is, even if you don't know about compressor stalls ahead of time. 2 seconds of Google would definitely reveal that jet engines are a whole separate industry. Screw Boeing in general, but this is meh.
But they added it to their planes, with their negligence in safety and quality inspections it's obvious why they selected a bad engine, it's their fault.
@@azzv.kuskatanBoeing doesn’t sell the plane with engines, manufacturer the engines or maintain the engines. Airlines buy the engines and are the ones responsible for them. Boeing sucks but so does your take on who’s responsible
4:25 "aquiring that company"... No he wants to shut that company up and have better cover ups in place.
I know Boeing are definitely cutting lots of corners and need to be held accountable, but the engines aren't made by Boeing and they are normally independently maintained by the engine manufacturer
"We have increased our quality inspectors significantly." Except for any ones who want to talk. Those suddenly decrease.
Corrections need to be made on this story… First, I am no Boeing boy but a compressor stall on a high bypass turbofan engine has nothing to do with Boeing… it’s either a General Electric, Pratt and Whitney, or Rolls-Royce engine.
In a BOEING plane! How hard is this to understand? It’s basic accountability.
@@WilkinsMichaela Michelin tire blows out on a Ford Focus. It’s clearly Ford’s fault.
@@WilkinsMichael just because you have a smart phone doesn’t mean you’re smart…
@@Smith000006 It’s the friggin engine, the main part of the plane. What insane logic is this? This is exactly the problem.
@@kortfreedrish6710 Not an argument. Lame insults are for stupid people with nothing to say but their ego can’t handle that fact.
No way you'd get me to fly on a Boeing plane. NO WAY
Same! When Krystal said she’d be uncomfortable, I was thinking, girl, why would you even tempt fate like that?! But she probably flies a lot for work, so it’s probably difficult to avoid.
@Chuckina_ I had final destination thoughts when I saw the footage. Oh,
hell nah. 🤣
Wussy Alert!.
For $33 million dollars, his sorry ass should be on the front line investigating each and every plane.
I'm Quality Certified for the auto industry. Someone, likely me, would be fired if there was one incident of a car leaving the plant, that ended up killing someone due to quality negligence. Shame on him and everyone that fosters this piss poor disregard to public safety. 😤
Boeing should get inspected on a regular basis, or the company should be closed for good. Every single family who has lost a family member on a plane crash on Boeing should sue the sht out of this company.
How many more of these Boeing issues need to happen before the FAA grounds all the Boeing planes???
Geez
FAA is in Bed with Boeing !
Personally, I think we can all sleep well, knowing that good 'ol Mayor Pete is gonna handle things.
.. and by "handle things," I mean .. umm .. you know .. uhh .. get your mind outta the gutter. * Sheesh *
Won’t happen because FAA is corrupted
Boeing does not make engines. They buy them from GE just like Airbus does. Same engines. You want to shut down Airbus and GE too?
@@darinsingleton3553to be fair my mind didn’t go in the gutter; I genuinely imagined him cutting a ribbon at a McDonald’s play place or something
Please don't comment on aviation if you don't know anything about aviation. Thanks.
I already struggle to get on a plane and absolutely hate flying. This is all nightmare fuel.
Boeing doesn’t make engines. Of all the things to blame them with, engines aren’t one
Every major CEO should be forced to go through the Jack Ma Experience.
Not to defend the guy… but dawn and cheesecloth are regularly used products in all sorts of production
Yea lol the soap trick is done everywhere, very normal
Ah, well, in that case..........🙃
To be fair, this looks like an engine problem. That would be on GE or Pratt & Whitney, Boeing doesn’t make engines.
that dude looks scared and guilty
The engine failed. Not the aircraft. Boeing doesn’t make aircraft engines- Rolls Royce does. Jesus Christ, basic knowledge.
But it's the company that selected the damage part due to lack of quality and safety measures, it's their own negligence.
They cut corners and didn't test the parts they installed. Average Joe is not this dumb, sorry Boeing.
I will add, knowing is only half the battle. You need to add "common sense" to your "basic knowledge" to get to where the rest of us are.
Also GE and Pratt and Whitney. Airbus also fly these engines. But Boeing is not excused from the other crap.
Who's responsibility is it to make sure the whole plane is working at point of sale? Basic knowledge
It's just a compressor stall. Take it easy with the hysterics.
1) They are straight up not as common as you're pretending.
2) It's up to them to make sure the engine and computer will play well together and prevent this
3) It's up to them to test the craft before it flies commercially
4) You're defending a billion dollar company literally ending lives because they cut corners
"Just a compressor stall" that could cause the engine to stall and ultimately lead to a possible crash but "stop with the hysterics". It's just the engine right it's not like it's a vital part required for the plane to fly or anything..... Oh wait 🙄🤦
Boeing damage control going hard in the comments today
Anyone who is familiar with or works in aerospace knows this is a non issue and one of the few things that Boeing actually does have no role in or control over. It's a maintenance issue on the engine manufacturer and the airline. Surges are a result of degraded airflow due to wear or buildup and although they are visually scary, they are totally safe and not a big deal. 9 times out of 10, they cause no damage and all that needs to be done is for the pilot to reduce thrust on the affected engine temporarily and then bring the power back up and continue on their way. Worst case scenario is they shut down the engine and make a totally routine and normal single engine landing and put everyone on a new plane. This is not an emergency and it's not dangerous, and happens to airbus as often as Boeing. The manufacturers have no control over it, have no way to prevent it, and have no way to anticipate it. Boeing and airbus don't even sell planes with engines at all - they sell the airframe and after the airline contracts with the engine manufacturer of their choice separately for engines, maintenance, monitoring, etc, and the same engines used on Boeing planes are used on airbus planes.
Boeing is a disaster and they are a prime example of what happens when you allow vast deregulation, monopoly ownership, and outright naked corporate greed to spread throughout an industry. The number of accidents and incidents that are directly attributable to the outright greed and corruption of the Boeing executives and their push to put maximum profits over everything are endless - they deserve 1000% of the scrutiny they are under and executives deserve jail time but this example simply isn't one of them.
@@GlutenEruption 💯 well articulated
I work for a large publicly traded pharma company. I often see new hires come from other local, US based pharma companies. They always tell us “if you think this is bad you should see (insert pharma/compounding/lyophilization Co here). It’s honestly terrifying and I question every aspirin I reluctantly take.
I have to say, given that I'm from Toronto, I really didn't need to see this video today. 😒
Why would you ever board a Boeing airplane today when you know after all that has happened that you might be the one that gets on a really bad plane that takes everyone out?
How many crashes have occurred recently on Boeing ? 0?
@@AverageJoe483 So you wanna be the one who's on the first crash because Boeing decided to save up a little money on the safety?
@Reese_Knight Sure, but when it's known that they are taking shortcuts when it comes to safety would you want to take the chance?
@@BassenGamingfunny thing is those money savings aren't being passed to the consumer, so they're still paying full price for less safety 😂
@@BassenGaming I’ll take my chances 🙄
It was an engine issue…
Is the engine not part of the plane that THEY added? If there are problems it's Boing's problems, safety inspections and quality inspections are their responsibility.
Did they test the engine? If so, why did it fly? If not, why not?
Get it? It's their fault. They installed garbage and sold us tickets to ride it.
@@azzv.kuskatan I’m not defending Boeing at all, I’m just saying that Emily was dismissive of Air Canada’s explanation that it was an engine problem, when in fact, it WAS an engine problem. Furthermore, engines flaming like that happen more than you might think. The bigger question to me is if the airplane was able land safely and the reasons it did flame. Was there a bird strike? None of that was covered in this segment.
@@dbptwg are you asking if the manufacturer of the engine tested it? Or did Boeing? Or more importantly did Air Canada and their maintenance people test and maintain the engine, which is how it works in reality.
Get it? It’s a nuanced issue. And the cause of the flame outs was not gone into in this segment.
Compressor stall. Aircraft is not on fire.
The plane is experiencing a compressor stall -- not very dangerous considering the aircraft will easily fly on the still-operating engine. It is indeed an engine issue and not the plane "on fire". This routine failure is to be expected from time to time, and has been for almost as long as jet engines have existed.
I hope he goes to prison.
You all are journalists and you should know better. Boeing doesn't build engines. The video shows a compressor stall that could happen to any airliner.
Boeing presents the perfect scenario to emphasize the importance of the profit motive as opposed to the value of human life and the fiscal welfare of the corporation.
This is what happens when you deregulate 🤷♂️
Boeing: That's just an engine issue
Everyone else: That's "we're all gonna die" issue!
I just booked a couple of flights for July and made sure it wasn't on any Boeing plane.
They don't make the engines
Because they are outsourcing. They are still responsible. What kind of negligent company sources defective engines? The two crashes were years ago and they STILL haven’t gotten their act together. Plus they are murdering whistleblowers.
CEO salaries are WILD. I’ll do it for 250k a year and do 1000x better.
As an old-school Boeing engineer once said “it’s a bad idea to have lawyers and accountants building things that fly“. Don’t forget that Boeing and the rest of the airline industry has had to be bailed out twice since 2000.
Big L on this take. An engine compressor stall is NOT a airframe manufacturing issue. It is an Engine issue. Boeing does not make engines. and that engine in particular exists on other aircraft not just Boeing. Also this plane was 16 years in service, so any engine issues would fall on the airline maintenance. Boeing deserves flak for its recent issues but in no way does that video represent that.
But they added it to their plane and didn't check it, it's their problem now.
@@azzv.kuskatanIf it's been in service that long it needs to be passing rigorous inspections from the operator, aka the airline. Not sure what model engine is on this plane but many of the engines are Rolls Royce and other ICE manufacturers. Boeing should have the hammer brought down on them but not sure this case falls under that
Boeing created this for themselves. They have planes galling out of the sky with "optional" features to keep them from crashing, faulty angle of attack sensors, and even fake titanium. Now people see every engine flame out as another example and wonder what whistleblower this criminal CEO will assassinate next. This man and his company does not deserve the defense of literally any one who had any contact with aviation.
First
everyone already knows there's criminal activity happening. That whistleblower dying was far too suspicious for there not to be some foul play and the longer it goes on the more people will get hurt and the worse the repercussions will be for both boeing and the perception of the justice system
The engines are always on fire. That's why it's called an internal combustion engine. Occasionally the combustion comes out, and the engine stalls. It's not a Boeing issue
Yeah my car engine exploded this morning. And not just once, but thousands of times per minute.
What's even more bothering to me about this incident is that my wife binges the CBC news (our national news network) every morning, and they had plenty of time to drone on about useless Canadian artists, the weather, and all sorts of other nonsense on repeat, but this is the first time we heard about this. Now we're feeling super gaslit, because we either somehow completely missed this or they deliberately underplayed it or didn't cover it....
"Those are just wing issues"
> "Ohhh, okay then; nevermind."
He hasn’t met with them because they’ve been expired
Boeing absolutely bears responsibility for the quality issues. However, the engine on fire incident is bad timing for the company. They don’t manufacture jet engines for their commercial planes. Most of the Boeing/Airbus commercial engines are manufactured by P&W and GE, who also design and build our military jet engines. I used to work for one of these jet engine companies, and I can say that engine safety and quality is always the #1 priority.
CEO getting paid even after such bad performance and deaths of people shows how rotten the system is.
The crazy thing about engine issues is if they happen in your car you on the ground, not too big of a deal. But if they happen in a plane, it’s a little bit more of an “Issue”
You guys know this kind of thing happens frequently. They probably hit a bird or something broke down in the engine, which is built by another company.
Populist Republican is the only one drilling this CEO with hard-hitting questions. My, my how the tables have turned.
Boeing doesn’t make the engines. They are usually made by Rolls Royce or GE.
Yes, it is an engine issue…. And the engine is made by GE. Please at least look up compressor stall. In the original video you can even hear one of the ground members reassure the person videoing that it was indeed compressor stall. Not saying Boeing is innocent but let’s not overreact to any minor problem saying it’s a Boeing issue, especially if these planes haven’t seen the inside of a Boeing facility in the past 20 years. Thank you.
I've worked for a certain monopolistic shipping company for 20 +years and it's happened there too.
We were an actual company, but now have evolved into a criminal filled cesspool, mainly due to poor management and service to the shareholders.
Decay is the inevitable result of corporations that are not maintained.
This is a bigger problem in America than they want to admit.
Sickening how Calhoun can be so smug when people have literally died and their loved ones are in attendance! 😡
Sociopath, this is why he got paid the big bucks.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. Please dont be alarmed by the deafening sound, the violent vibrations, and the fire blackening your windows. Protocol demands that we test the afterburners.
What about life sentences for those lawyers who helped assassinate that whistleblower?
1 million dollars a pay check! “What would you say you do for Boeing ” fracking roasted 🔥🔥🔥
Remeber obama giving speeches on Boeing behalf when it moved its headquarters to Chicago. Roll tape please
Make Engineers Run Boeing Again
Why is there no class action lawsuit against him and the company?
The plane wasn't on fire. It looks like the engine failed during takeoff (possible bird-strike). The engine was probably set to auto-restart during takeoff, but if it was damaged, it would just flame-out again. Repeated restart attempts would produce the 'pulsing' effect. Unlike other cases involving Boeing, both the plane and the pilot performed as they should and there was no accident, loss of life etc.
Flying is still the safest way to travel invest in Boeing they don't make engines and don't care to offer any solutions
Hes probably wondering why you'd light a man on fire before throwing him out of an airplane
Bane to the whistleblower
Called a compressor stall. Noone was in any danger what so ever...
You don't get a 45% raise without tying up loose ends. This man was paid for a job
Saying they’re goosing the stock price is misleading considering that Boeings stock is still down from March 2020. Other aerospace companies have recovered from a similar downturn during that time. Look at airbus, and Raytheon specifically. While I do agree they’re promoting profit over safety, that particular talking point isn’t the most valid imo. The stock is down over the entire period of Calhoun tenure.
The engines are leased from a separate company. Boeing doesn't build engines
If this were any other industry, Boeing would've been forced to issue a nationwide recall on all its 737 Max and Dreamliners at this point.
! There Should Be a Law enforced that All USA Government and Politicians and Families MUST FLY Using Boeing Planes. Please Enforce This!
The plane is not on fire. It's called a compressor stall. It happens and has nothing to do with Boeing
No prison time for the rich same ol same ol
Worth noting that the engines of Boeing planes aren't actually made by Boeing. Could still be a Boeing problem, but without more information, it's just as likely to be a GE or an Air Canada maintenance problem.
Boeing treats their planes like Air Canada treats their customers.