Great job , Christian textual critics should take charge in weeding out flawed reasoning which can paint a picture far from the transmission history of the Bible, Thanks for the video.
do you have a video about luke 9,55-56 (long version) or planning to do one about it? the CT and most modern bible translations have these verses shortened. they usually omit " and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.For the Son of man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but to save them." the byzantine text has its full length tho. if you already did one about it, can u give me a link to it?
If possible would it be possible to make a video about the oldest papyri (ex.chester beatty papyri)there is barely any detailed video available on YT, many Christians don't even know that older New Testament content exists before Codes Vat. And Sin , would really appreciate
@@Dwayne_Green God bless you,I just saw a video mentioning John 8 and the speaker leaving out Church liturgical history and sensitivity of the issue of adultery tells the audience its simply not the original we don't have it in the earliest we just dont know ,it's sad to see a repetitive and dishonest use of Mark ending John 8 and 1 John 5:7 and Erasmus myths by even Christians to portray a history of clumsiness doubt and uncertainty to a history of unequalled manuscripts attestation, incredible detailed textual criticism history and seriousness and recognition of textual cases by the Church itself plus the incredible odds that testifies of the scribal quality that in different geographical locations and hundreds of scribes in different centuries the agreement of text is in the 99% and above in any scenario taken, God bless you in your efforts to show the real picture of textual criticism and the church and what it proves , bhart Erman says we have the whole NT from early quotations and unaffected doctrine who isn't even Christian that's why your work is extremely important for atleast Christians to see and learn.
@@Dwayne_Green it would be great to add Hebrews 10:5 and Psal 40:6 in the list even if its a different case but you would make a great video, there's a forum "How is the Septuagint interpretation of Psalms 40:6 reconciled with the Hebrew text?" On bible hermeneutics site that has great info on the verse ,really appreciate all your work
I was convinced to start using esv due to the older manuscripts. But after some back and forth with ChatGPT I found out the only thing we can know for 100% certain about sinaiticus and vaticanus is they were found in 19th century. I pressed if it was possible they could have been created as forgeries then and it said it’s possible due to all we know. Why do we assume they’re older when we don’t and can’t know that?
I'd be skeptical of chatGTP, all it's really doing is collecting all knowledge on something and spitting out a result, regardless of how outlandish the claim. There are other ways of determining the age of a manuscripts, weather it's chemical dating (which has been done with the ink in places on Vaticanus) or by comparing the style of lettering on a Manuscript. With that being said, Aleph and B may indeed be form the fourth century, but many Byzantine readings have been found in the papyri and in quotes from the early church fathers.
Thanks, Dwayne
Excellent research. Thank you!
Great job , Christian textual critics should take charge in weeding out flawed reasoning which can paint a picture far from the transmission history of the Bible, Thanks for the video.
vid. = vide! 2nd person singular imperative: "see!"
a polite way to tell someone to look it up, lol
do you have a video about luke 9,55-56 (long version) or planning to do one about it? the CT and most modern bible translations have these verses shortened. they usually omit " and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.For the Son of man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but to save them." the byzantine text has its full length tho. if you already did one about it, can u give me a link to it?
I haven't yet looked at this one but it's on the list of partial verses that I'm going to look at. But it's fairly far down the list.
If possible would it be possible to make a video about the oldest papyri (ex.chester beatty papyri)there is barely any detailed video available on YT, many Christians don't even know that older New Testament content exists before Codes Vat. And Sin , would really appreciate
I've got a lot of things lined up already, but this may be a worthwhile discussion :)
@@Dwayne_Green God bless you,I just saw a video mentioning John 8 and the speaker leaving out Church liturgical history and sensitivity of the issue of adultery tells the audience its simply not the original we don't have it in the earliest we just dont know ,it's sad to see a repetitive and dishonest use of Mark ending John 8 and 1 John 5:7 and Erasmus myths by even Christians to portray a history of clumsiness doubt and uncertainty to a history of unequalled manuscripts attestation, incredible detailed textual criticism history and seriousness and recognition of textual cases by the Church itself plus the incredible odds that testifies of the scribal quality that in different geographical locations and hundreds of scribes in different centuries the agreement of text is in the 99% and above in any scenario taken, God bless you in your efforts to show the real picture of textual criticism and the church and what it proves , bhart Erman says we have the whole NT from early quotations and unaffected doctrine who isn't even Christian that's why your work is extremely important for atleast Christians to see and learn.
@@Dwayne_Greenreally appreciate God bless all your work
@@Dwayne_Green it would be great to add Hebrews 10:5 and Psal 40:6 in the list even if its a different case but you would make a great video, there's a forum "How is the Septuagint interpretation of Psalms 40:6 reconciled with the Hebrew text?" On bible hermeneutics site that has great info on the verse ,really appreciate all your work
I was convinced to start using esv due to the older manuscripts. But after some back and forth with ChatGPT I found out the only thing we can know for 100% certain about sinaiticus and vaticanus is they were found in 19th century. I pressed if it was possible they could have been created as forgeries then and it said it’s possible due to all we know. Why do we assume they’re older when we don’t and can’t know that?
I'd be skeptical of chatGTP, all it's really doing is collecting all knowledge on something and spitting out a result, regardless of how outlandish the claim. There are other ways of determining the age of a manuscripts, weather it's chemical dating (which has been done with the ink in places on Vaticanus) or by comparing the style of lettering on a Manuscript. With that being said, Aleph and B may indeed be form the fourth century, but many Byzantine readings have been found in the papyri and in quotes from the early church fathers.