Exclusive: Microsoft CEO Nadella on the promise and problems of A.I.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ม.ค. 2024
  • In an exclusive interview with Lester Holt, Microsoft's CEO Satya Nadella discusses the company's move into the world of artificial intelligence, the promises and risks, and whether A.I. will displace workers.
    » Subscribe to NBC News: / nbcnews
    NBC News Digital is a collection of innovative and powerful news brands that deliver compelling, diverse and engaging news stories. NBC News Digital features NBCNews.com, MSNBC.com, TODAY.com, Nightly News, Meet the Press, Dateline, and the existing apps and digital extensions of these respective properties. We deliver the best in breaking news, live video coverage, original journalism and segments from your favorite NBC News Shows.
    Connect with NBC News Online!
    Breaking News Alerts: link.nbcnews.com/join/5cj/bre...
    Visit NBCNews.Com: www.nbcnews.com/
    Find NBC News on Facebook: / nbcnews
    Follow NBC News on Twitter: / nbcnews
    Get more of NBC News delivered to your inbox: nbcnews.com/newsletters
    #Microsoft #AI #SatyaNadella

ความคิดเห็น • 61

  • @realnapster1522
    @realnapster1522 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    It’s not the AI but tech CEOs and their owners who are problem!

  • @DeltaSierra181
    @DeltaSierra181 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Linux > Windows

    • @hackintosh3899
      @hackintosh3899 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just make sure you aren't using a CIA/Mossad distro that is as infested as PRISM program OS's like Windows. Also TPM was always about this. It's why companies like Germany called out Trusted Platform module lunacy years ago and MS repeatedly tried to implement it in all their newer failed OS's. First with 8 now with 11.

  • @Anarchy-Is-Liberty
    @Anarchy-Is-Liberty 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    AI is an assistant with an WEF mindset!

  • @kristinalillieneke7859
    @kristinalillieneke7859 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Why is Microsoft involving itself in politics?

  • @Onlytest2754
    @Onlytest2754 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Since it says "train the AI", it already implies that it will have a configuration in favor of something, that is, that it will not be impartial and will have preference to something, so it will do what the trainers tell it 🤷‍♂️

  • @Billy420-69
    @Billy420-69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Disable my computers and I'll disable you. FAFO

    • @iamdrunker
      @iamdrunker 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      i watched the entire 4:38 video. I didn't see any mention of Microsoft disabling PCs at all. If I missed it someone, please point it out. TY

    • @hackintosh3899
      @hackintosh3899 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you running a Trusted Platform Module enabled PC with a Trusted Platform module OS like Windows 11? You already lost.

    • @Billy420-69
      @Billy420-69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@hackintosh3899 nice try fbi

    • @hackintosh3899
      @hackintosh3899 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Billy420-69 Look up the PRISM program Billy. MS makes a CIA OS. If you want any security, privacy or want to actually own the PC you have you should be running Linux.

    • @Billy420-69
      @Billy420-69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      youre right. I was wondering if I had a stroke or it was implied. I've seen it reported elsewhere MS wants to disable browsers if newsgaurd doesnt like what youre looking at @@iamdrunker

  • @ambition112
    @ambition112 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    0:11: ⚠ Potential and risks of A.I. in upcoming election and beyond, from cancer detection to disinformation.
    1:03: ⚙ Exploring the potential and risks of artificial intelligence in addressing election interference and disinformation.
    2:10: 🤖 Microsoft CEO discusses the role of A.I. technology as an assistant, not a replacement for humans, and the need for industry regulation.
    2:58: 💡 Insights on labor market dynamics, AI training using NYT content, and ethical considerations.
    3:55: ⚠ Microsoft CEO discusses cybersecurity concerns over Russian state-sponsored cyberattacks.
    Recapped using Tammy AI

  • @Bozojimmy
    @Bozojimmy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Im so so bored of this mundane world that i want AI to take over 😎

    • @dsoprano13
      @dsoprano13 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You need to watch more Black Mirror

  • @anthgrind
    @anthgrind 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    BILL GATES THE DICTATOR

  • @cloudstrife7083
    @cloudstrife7083 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    OF COURSE theses copyright laws will need to adapt to neeeew technology like AI BECAUSE AI is trans-formative it's new world... but in the 90's and the early 2000's theses same copyright laws would allow you to install Windows on 1 and ONLY 1 COMPUTER to profit Microsoft (especially in the AntiTrust case) BUT TODAY they will need to adapt a little bit ... what a beautiful 2 standard world we are living in ...

  • @blackieblack
    @blackieblack 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Why is this man even in the USA, let alone head of one of it's most valuable companies?

    • @thomasryan7561
      @thomasryan7561 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Because he is a pawn and a yes man... the company serves itself and the interests of profit and power. They don't give a flying fore truck about you.

    • @alienware2149
      @alienware2149 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Lol you have no idea what you are saying😂😂busy in tiktok and insta ,how would you ever know that this Indian man saved Microsoft's a*ss after Steve Ballmer crippled it (Satya literally tripled the stock price)

    • @thomasryan7561
      @thomasryan7561 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He is also be a very smart man, no doubt. But he serves Microsoft and its shareholders first. Of course the goal is to make more profit, but they've also move more r + d to israel and have started manufacturing their own AI chips which will give them and apple the duopoly outright if it is not already. But nah mate, keep on keeping on.

    • @realnapster1522
      @realnapster1522 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He is very smart and they need him to run largest software company. That’s why!

  • @normanoro206
    @normanoro206 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was a thought-provoking interview on many fronts because so much was broached. In terms of artificial intelligence and work, the ideal of course is for it to bolster (not replace) people. However, with each new technology of consequence, jobs that didn't exist before get created while others disappear. This is an unpleasant fact in many ways (especially for those who unfortunately aren't well-positioned for the resulting changes), but a fact nonetheless. With AI, I think the level of government intervention needed to prevent displacements that society can't adapt to in time is an important question. It's still early days and this isn't an immediate threat, but given the astonishing speed of AI innovation, I don't think anyone can completely discount the need for some kind of intervention down the road. As for the AI business model as it stands, a lot does hinge on what constitutes fair use and what a copyright means in this increasingly digital age. Of course, it's hard not to sympathize with artists, newspapers and other content creators, many of whom struggle financially to begin with because of the nature of their work. Although I'm not a legal expert, intuitively it seems content creators should get some level of compensation if their work is being monetized via a technology company's AI-related products and services. On the other hand, the notion of fair use is a cornerstone of our society. It allows people to use copyrighted works for (among other things) commentary, criticism, research and scholarship. Hopefully, whatever solution emerges keeps this important concept alive while being fair to artists, newspapers, etc and not hurting incentives to create high-quality content. As for identifying content that is AI-generated in order to stifle misinformation and disinformation, it sounds like that effort is further along that I thought based on what I've been reading. That's a crucial first step, but (as Satya Nadella notes) this year's elections won't be the first with disinformation and misinformation; and more will need to be done outside of tracking AI content to protect their integrity. As for state-supported hackers targeting private companies like Microsoft, that is obviously chilling. It's heartening to know that Microsoft was able to detect what had happened, but it's very easy to imagine (because the world unfortunately has no shortage of experience with cybercrime over the past several years) conflict intensifying on the cyber-front between nation-states, with an expanding ring of private companies and individuals getting caught in the crossfire. I think Satya Nadella is right in stating that some kind of agreement akin to the Geneva Convention would be ideal to keep attacks from spiraling out of control.

  • @masteryoda2183
    @masteryoda2183 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank god Microsoft has privatized truth now. Know I know to simply believe what ever this giant mega corporation tells me to. Isn't that right, ChatGPT?

  • @hilariousgas
    @hilariousgas 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    it's like no one saw terminator or the matrix

  • @moniquegonzalez9276
    @moniquegonzalez9276 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Adversaries!!??!!!!
    Well that’s a clear delineation.

  • @DouglasBoyce3
    @DouglasBoyce3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I think it's interesting that Lester Hold references The New Times in a question about using the Times content. Lester just used the NYT content in the question. How is AI suppose to NOT use the content to train AI models with the reporters are using to create their stories, essential a Reporting AI Model ?

  • @freestylefranc2653
    @freestylefranc2653 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    going to be the straw that broke the camels back!

  • @alcodie1558
    @alcodie1558 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did Terminator not teach us anything !!

  • @valboolin3538
    @valboolin3538 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Очень умная статья много шума в прессе, / всё дело в зип-компрессе

  • @cmiguel268
    @cmiguel268 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I only wish Nutella will fix Microsoft in Android. Buggy is an understatement, is more like a swarm.

  • @mgread51
    @mgread51 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE AGREES, WE WILL REMOVE EVERYONE WHO DOESN'T!"
    this is why the 2nd amendment exists

  • @user-qu8lt3hf7e
    @user-qu8lt3hf7e 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Get rid of ai

    • @kushking949
      @kushking949 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      we have a lot more issues than AI karen

    • @user-qu8lt3hf7e
      @user-qu8lt3hf7e 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kushking949 ur moma stupid

    • @xalspaero
      @xalspaero 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ok troll

    • @user-qu8lt3hf7e
      @user-qu8lt3hf7e 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@xalspaero stupid

    • @2CSST2
      @2CSST2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Should not and will not happen. Get lost

  • @ofio
    @ofio หลายเดือนก่อน

    dont trust this guy

  • @Buy_YT_Views_381
    @Buy_YT_Views_381 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is a mood lifter.

  • @ArtMo71
    @ArtMo71 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What are we gonna do when someone hacks AI and changes the protocols?

  • @YouTubeAreCommunistScum
    @YouTubeAreCommunistScum 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The worms need bill gates, looks like this guy as well