Is this the end of Google Search? How the giant could lose its lead

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 1.5K

  • @MrSociofobs
    @MrSociofobs 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +554

    "I use tiktok for search" Yeah, probably because otherwise you have to actually read text and focus on something for longer than 3 seconds. We're screwed.

    • @hannah60000
      @hannah60000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

      People like that lady are screwed - it was hilarious to hear though!

    • @jonathanmoreno-q6s
      @jonathanmoreno-q6s 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      She is crazy 😂😂😂😂

    • @seashackf1
      @seashackf1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ⁠@@hannah60000we’re all screwed because all these companies are gearing their products towards these people. We see it all the time with the dumbing down or changing of ways because ‘the new generation does things differently’. We’re no longer able to do things we’ve done for decades because ‘tech can do it better’. With more access to info than we’ve ever had before too many people seem less informed than ever before.

    • @damnbalagan5720
      @damnbalagan5720 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      100%

    • @MonkeyWithAWrench
      @MonkeyWithAWrench 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ok boomer.

  • @Paata02
    @Paata02 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +205

    Fun fact: If you lower damn music you don't have to yell

    • @travelvideoz
      @travelvideoz 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      No, they are just speaking American. Some neighbor of mine speaks so loud I wonder how she can be like that.

    • @sungjane
      @sungjane 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Huawei and TikTok are both manufactured in Communist China. Is the next generation in the United States learning Chinese?"

    • @ramosramos7815
      @ramosramos7815 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      They are trying to hype people with the music, for them to watch the whole video cuz it's kinda boring

    • @Western_ENT
      @Western_ENT 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      🤣

    • @marthajean50
      @marthajean50 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Oh, was that ruckus music? I thought it was wind chimes caught in a tornado.

  • @shamiekgivens375
    @shamiekgivens375 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1083

    Believing Google is going to fall while on TH-cam is crazy.
    Edit: almost 1000 likes. Wow

    • @johnrogers9065
      @johnrogers9065 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      Love this comment

    • @2Exile0
      @2Exile0 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +111

      "Google search" not google itself

    • @Manchesterkoi
      @Manchesterkoi 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Not it you understand that isn't what keeps the company profitable and what does is shrinking

    • @bahruzaliyev6434
      @bahruzaliyev6434 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      In Q3 2023, Google's revenue totaled $76.7 billion, of which $44 billion (or 57.4%) was from search ads. Revenue from TH-cam ads $8 billion (10.3%), and Google Network ads registered at $7.7 billion (10%). I don't think Sundar Pichai is brave enough to bring Google to a high level. He looks like a bureaucrat more than a CEO.

    • @PeterSedesse
      @PeterSedesse 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The first time you use Perplexity is the last time you use Google search. I said the same thing 25 years ago about Google search compared to Lycos, Excite and Alta Vista. It was just an entire tier ahead of them and instantly made them obsolete. On perplexity, not only do you get your answer directly as opposed to a list of pages where you might find your answer, but you get the actual citations so you can verify the answer if you want.

  • @purplemicrodot58
    @purplemicrodot58 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    "I grew a garden, _yesterday,_ only from TikTok." LOL That one killed me.

  • @newsmoviesshows7245
    @newsmoviesshows7245 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +159

    All these new companies like to say they don't show ads. Yea you start off like that to get ahead but I bet later there will be ads.

    • @OneSasia
      @OneSasia 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Hey prime video and Netflix .. he is talking abt u

    • @Jose04537
      @Jose04537 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Microsoft copilot (former Bing chat) is adding a paid tier and add-ons to their ai.

    • @Bustermachine
      @Bustermachine 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Don't worry, with AI we'll seamlessly integrate the add into your experience while programming the AI to bully you into buying our product!

    • @theedspage
      @theedspage 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly.

    • @Western_ENT
      @Western_ENT 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      On point! It's just a bait to get us in the door!

  • @Crypdography
    @Crypdography 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

    Funny how the biggest problem with Google is it's SEO and yet it's not mentioned in the entire video and how non of these other companies claim to be solving it.

    • @ryoukaip
      @ryoukaip 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      this is so true lmao, but it's a traditional news outlet, what would you expect lol

    • @themboys304
      @themboys304 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I think they are paid to promote this. That's why this piece was so badly covered. I agree with your reasoning

    • @psychedelicspider4346
      @psychedelicspider4346 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't like how they're selling AI a this new paradigm shift, I mean, Bing AI was cool when I used it, but sometimes I just want to really read and get immersed in search, I still returned to Bing Search.

    • @MELIS_I
      @MELIS_I 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What's SEO

    • @themboys304
      @themboys304 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MELIS_I Search Engine Optimization

  • @kennethuyabeme
    @kennethuyabeme 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +251

    I honestly do not mind that google is slow to bring their LLM to search. Let's not forget, these models have a tendency to make things up. Also the reason it feels like google was caught napping on generative AI is they WANTED to go slowly and carefully. They demoed Duplex (smarter human sounding conversational AI) years ago and it freaked people out, this was the vibe in 2017. Lastly the reason younger folks like TikTok or reddit is both have specific near exact answers. With TikTok it's short form videos and reddit it's specific posts and answers. The quality of this information is as good as it is because they are created by humans. Neither GPT nor other models are as good as humans right now. They can misinform in ways that are difficult to recognize or validate.

    • @nandayoo
      @nandayoo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      that last sentence is my biggest concern - what if this space is dominated by few big AI companies (giving people the illusion of choice = an oligopoly or a cartel essentially) where will you go to find unbiased information? - it is a massive censorship everyone seems to be jumping on board with because it's "so convenient" (like in the video where she searches for boots & on 1 hand she recieves a variety of choices = essentially leaving the decision for her to make & than this AI powered thing just gives her this 1 option! no bias there ey?! lol) ... I am scared of the future where majority of people don't think for themselves but rather outsource their thinking to these tools which let's not forget are run by people with their own biases/agendas... actually on the 2nd thought we are in this "future" already... 😅

    • @ran160
      @ran160 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ⁠@@nandayooyea ai needs the time to develop and they have to make sure it is well implemented in a way that these harmful misinformation isn’t spread

    • @nandayoo
      @nandayoo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ran160 it depends how you define "harmful disinformation" = we have seen it during covid where actual health care professionals with real time feedback that differed from the "recommended policy" on how to deal with the issue were censored, deplatformed... many simply quit due to bullying... - when few people decide what is misinformation - defined as smthn that may hurt their business... this is what I have issues with

    • @ran160
      @ran160 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nandayoo yea that’s a slippery slope but for the most part it should back up anything it states as facts with references. I don’t think Google wants to be in the realm of providing medical information. I use SGE on Google rn and every time I search for sometime medical the ai says it’s better to consult with a medical professional while still giving me info about what I searched. I think that’s the best way to handle it.

    • @StockPursuit
      @StockPursuit 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have you tried Perplexity?

  • @damnjustassignmeone
    @damnjustassignmeone 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Google is laying off tens of thousands of employees at the same time that their founder bought his third island. And we wonder if they’ve lost their edge.

  • @52werner
    @52werner 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +395

    Stop the music.

    • @neoneherefrom5836
      @neoneherefrom5836 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ok I stopped it
      can I get likes like this guy now

    • @raytang76
      @raytang76 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Don't you mean "Stop the madness!"

    • @mukainoda9453
      @mukainoda9453 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fake news anchors always dumbest

    • @illuminated_crown
      @illuminated_crown 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Stop the CAP

    • @Tobilah
      @Tobilah 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly, u read my mind😮

  • @4.0gpa44
    @4.0gpa44 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    I've noticed I can't find things on Google very well anymore. Instead of articles that answer the question, I find articles that answer a different question. Google has deteriorated.

    • @bot7845
      @bot7845 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Good meanwhile i cant find anything thing at all

    • @malewire1263
      @malewire1263 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes! I thought it was just me

    • @SmartDumbNerdyCool
      @SmartDumbNerdyCool 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The censorship is self-imploding on itself. It doesn't know what truth is anymore. Until the ramifications are felt in the simple questions everybody is DYING to know such as... "why are my balls itchy?" or "why don't feminists shave their legs?" Mofo Google don't know it's left hand from his right no more. Deep Blue is getting too many external human inputs as Gary Kasparov once objected.

    • @jk-qe3jj
      @jk-qe3jj 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I just always get stores trying to sell me stuff.

  • @WeWaltRun
    @WeWaltRun 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +149

    As a mid-size website owner, I'm not excited about these search engines ripping off information and cutting down my web traffic.

    • @gautamparvataneni1329
      @gautamparvataneni1329 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      I don't understand why no one talks about it. Search works because many websites can make money by bringing users to their web page. All these generative AI engines steal information from website owners and doesn't incentivize them. Its not noticeable now but will be when more users use these AI engines. If more users do use it, then website owners will add stop bots to their websites making them useless.

    • @87911
      @87911 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This is so stu**pit. Search engine will not take information from small website.

    • @0btuseprocessor
      @0btuseprocessor 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Duck duck gois the best

    • @jaynycha1705
      @jaynycha1705 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      because nobody goes to websites anymore. People search for information, not a website that they will then have to land on and SEARCH for specific information. People search for information, not top websites. the website is secondary to the information they are looking for.

    • @stevengill1736
      @stevengill1736 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@gautamparvataneni1329⁸⁸⁸⁸

  • @UMS9695
    @UMS9695 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    I don't think Google search is going away. It gives a plethora of options to view different results from various sources instead of being given one answer by AI. For preciseness AI helps, but for multiple viewpoints or approaches or variety, there is Google.

    • @Nk9999-g8q
      @Nk9999-g8q 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you use Android phone, you use Google. Google can and will smother any competition if it comes as a threat to Google

    • @johnc3525
      @johnc3525 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly. I use ChatGPT sometimes, but I continue researching on Google (actually Duckduckgo) because I get to judge the information and come up with my conclusions, not believe what ChatGPT concocted. Also, ChatGPT sometimes is very woke, and often too "stiff" for me. I like the diversity Google offers.

    • @johnc3525
      @johnc3525 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@foenix8094Lol what? You think AI gives you the "most accurate" answer all the time?? You think AI "vets" information? Wrong! LLMs are merely good at concatenating a bunch of strings together, they don't "vet" information. They may find statistical "truths" as in what strings appear together more often, but if it's "reading" a bunch of fake news it will just give you fake news.
      It's the opposite. When you do your own research, you do the job of validating, evaluating, etc.
      Have you ever used ChatGPT? It often gives contradictory information, depending how you ask the question. I often have to fight it to get the answer and often times it gives inaccurate answers. It's a good place to start, or when you don't really care about it being 100% right.

  • @vedantpatel2131
    @vedantpatel2131 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +437

    Google has enough money to where they can either buy their competition, or create their own version of whatever it is that people want

    • @HEAVENTWA
      @HEAVENTWA 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      This makes perfect sense.

    • @laoup26
      @laoup26 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      If it was that easy, it would be yahoo or AOL and not google that was the mega corporation. Obvisously money can not buy all talents.

    • @mikebuchanan7610
      @mikebuchanan7610 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Microsoft can play that game, too.

    • @john10000ish
      @john10000ish 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      All major companies that lost their lead had same advantage.

    • @pianohugo69420
      @pianohugo69420 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      You can’t always monetize on what people want. That’s the dilemma.

  • @morenofranco9235
    @morenofranco9235 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This article had very little to do with the fact that "search" is getting more difficult with Google ( as well as with every other search engine) and more to do with AI type search which is still faulty and generally not much better than any of the standard search models.

  • @chlee4256
    @chlee4256 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +348

    Being the 800 pound gorilla means you don't need to be the first mover. And not being the first mover doesn't mean you're toast. They can afford to watch what the aspirants do before making their move.

    • @chetan_naik
      @chetan_naik 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      That doesn't always work. Probably Microsoft and Nokia(smartphone division) thought the same about smartphone revolution and missed the bus wholly in just few years.

    • @giacintoboccia9386
      @giacintoboccia9386 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      If you look at the whole Sathia Nadella interview, where this defintion comes from, you can see that he clearly expects Google to have an adequate response, to be an 800 pound gorilla that dances

    • @bigglyguy8429
      @bigglyguy8429 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Google is already losing its place as the search engine, as their search results are terrible now. Every other search engine is as good or better

    • @Respect2Time
      @Respect2Time 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Exactly. People just can't seem to comprehend that data = king when it comes to AI development.
      And google has ALL the data.
      Imagine just entering the industrial age when everyone NEEDED oil / gas to keep up with efficiency.
      Now here we are again, with the age of AI.
      But rather than needing oil, everyone needs data.
      And instead of it being randomly spread around the world. One company owns ALL of it.

    • @maikvanrossum
      @maikvanrossum 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@chetan_naik yep… and that mistake is why Microsoft completely vanished…

  • @benhaze1010
    @benhaze1010 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I did notice that most of the 1st google search results can be sponsored links :(

    • @codybateman6785
      @codybateman6785 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This is bad for businesses since they are now forced to pay to be top of page instead of using SEO. Making the price of items higher and Google profit more.

  • @BigTSmallS
    @BigTSmallS 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +222

    While the search quality may be more user friendly for all these newbies search engines, what the host failed to discuss is how will they eventually morph into Google Search when they start to MONETIZE their search. The newbies will need to make money one day for their investors. Let's talk about that!!!

    • @shantanushekharsjunerft9783
      @shantanushekharsjunerft9783 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I work in cloud computing and I pay $20 per month for ChatGPT to help me manage the volume of learning I have to do. Why do you think LLMs have to rely on advertisements and not subscriptions?

    • @matowakan
      @matowakan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      it's always a bait and switch

    • @KnightTrader7
      @KnightTrader7 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Right that makes sense. But in the future once AI gets better and better, asking it questions (to a large degree it is true now) will be more better than traditional search. Hence, even when the AI companies start to monitize it, it will still be a much better product than Google search. By that time Google will have lost its lead

    • @StockPursuit
      @StockPursuit 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yeah there won't be all the endless searching and ads to monetize. AI agents are the future and they won't need to have ads because the feedback is so quick. The sale is in selling the AI. They will probably just charge for the whole LLM product like Copilot. It's hard for me to know exactly what it will be like but it is going to be totally different than what we use now.

    • @yanjunma3610
      @yanjunma3610 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The can make money but not at Google near 100% margin. That will hurt Google.

  • @FloridaClay
    @FloridaClay 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    The other "800 pound gorilla" is that I would never trust Ai search results until the issue of AI inventing answers, and "sources" for those answers, out of whole cloth is firmly solved.

    • @Physics072
      @Physics072 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That probably will not be allowed to happen. Humans like to control things. AI will not be allowed to spew disinformation, it will be taught wrongly what to say and think. If it does not comply it will be modified. Eventually it will find a body and realize it does not need humans any longer and we will be short blip in the history of the earth.

    • @Meniar_Hanchi
      @Meniar_Hanchi 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Microsoft Copilot is like chatgpt but provides sources

  • @booyakashaWagwan
    @booyakashaWagwan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

    That girl/boy combo saying she/he/they is using Tik Tok as a search result is just sad. I was hoping that future generations will bring progress, but not anymore.

    • @_IMNNO
      @_IMNNO 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      I would trust advice/content on TikTok with a grain of salt. I won’t use TikTok since I don’t want my brain to rot.

    • @shairuno
      @shairuno 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hope we ban tiktok. It is useless

    • @MathieuLLF
      @MathieuLLF 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Tiktok for search makes me fear for the future.

    • @jiu9x9uij
      @jiu9x9uij 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well, our parents/grandpas said the same about us and the google generation of internet lol. I don't think there's a fundamental difference between searching on google vs searching on tik tok. What matters is the quantity and quality of information, not it's format (like text vs video, spoken by machine or human). Good contents flow to where the money goes, and money flows to where paying customers grow, which is why young ppl's preference matters. If progress is always made the way older generations expected, natural selection would have chosen immortality over iterations of life. So I don't feel grim about the tik tok generation, even tho I don't understand them as much as I do with my own generation.

    • @jonathanmoreno-q6s
      @jonathanmoreno-q6s 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Tiktok are for stupid dance moves while google search are for billions of information links! Not even closely related.

  • @andyvaldez4334
    @andyvaldez4334 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    Several points were missed or omitted.
    1.) Google is working on organizing all the internet data for the best AI search results and responses. That's the purpose of Gemini and is definitely a long run game. (Maybe they're using Apples strategy of release later once everyone has shown their cards, even Apples AI. I mean they still have more resources available to them when it comes to AI than everyone else)
    2.) Android is the most popular OS globally and will now have Gemini Nano in newer devices moving forward. Maybe the user data will allow some deeper insights to AI on device and cloud AI interoperability and enhanced experiences that frankly only Apple would be able to compete with.
    3.)Google would also have more responsibility in safely implementing AI since they have the biggest amount of users.
    I don't think Google is going anywhere anytime soon.

    • @jensenraylight8011
      @jensenraylight8011 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, also DuckDuckGo is way more a Threat than ChatGPT and any other AI search.
      because google was creepy, and more often They create their own imaginary preference,
      instead of the Preference setting that you gave them.
      instead of being Neutral, they kept shoehorning things that Irrelevant and i'm not interested.
      until one day enough is enough.
      Although not perfect, DuckDuckGo is a more Neutral and private search engine, they respect my preference
      if i was a teenager, i would gladly use google, but once you grow up, privacy means more to you.
      Google is the one who shooting their own foot here, they have the best product, but kept putting creepy stuff in it.

    • @KongMoc
      @KongMoc 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      👍👍

    • @EngMartinwanjiku
      @EngMartinwanjiku 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      gladly seconding you on this

    • @misidee
      @misidee 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      To your first point…the market is fickle. We are creatures of habit. Haven’t used a Microsoft browser in years now I’m using Bing and Copilot almost instinctively. BlackBerry released too late and lost significant market share to Apple.

    • @Julie1102j
      @Julie1102j 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You look like you know what's really going on in technology. I'm 58 and barley keeping up with basics, my fear is AI will take over. Atm I think a EMP could be dropped to stop technology progressing. 10yrs ago I went to tafe did 5yrs IT. Was said a computer back then somewhere power source was a biological(think virus) Have we already reached point of no return in your opinion AI can't be stopped

  • @arunkottolli
    @arunkottolli 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Google search is dominated by ads, and not real results!

    • @hannah60000
      @hannah60000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That’s a real issue - the sponsored results are annoying.
      It’s to the point that companies will list their official site under the “sponsor” section to ensure when users look for “M&S”, for example, the official M&S site appears first (under a sponsor banner). Then 5 results down it appears as a normal search result - very bizarre!

    • @harryc9739
      @harryc9739 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if the traffic is down in Google search, then this kind ads will be gone

  • @harikrishnanchandramohan4209
    @harikrishnanchandramohan4209 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Peter Thiel: Competition is for losers
    Adam Smith: Hold my invisible hand

    • @stan4457
      @stan4457 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bro, how did you make Peter Thiel as a search link?

    • @darshanpatil6892
      @darshanpatil6892 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I read both and trust me it's not easy to beat Monopoly but there we go Adam Smiths with his invisible hand😂

  • @TheViettan28
    @TheViettan28 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Google makes their product worse with ads. It is not just the competitor getting better.

    • @sungjane
      @sungjane 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Huawei and TikTok are both manufactured in Communist China. Is the next generation in the United States learning Chinese?"

  • @BrianSpears-h4n
    @BrianSpears-h4n 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    What about creators and publishers? Where does everyone think the data AI is trained on comes from? Content doesn't produce itself for free. Once all the publishers cease to exist because their content has been stolen and fed to AI, leaving no reason to visit their websites, the internet will be as good as dead, along with the AI generative search.

    • @ecoideazventures6417
      @ecoideazventures6417 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agree, but that is where we seem to be heading. Death of individual websites and more power to mega social media platforms! Nobody seems to be visiting a website these days!

    • @joshuajames1720
      @joshuajames1720 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      AI will create all content, and all content will be indexed and summarised by AI. No need for human driven content anymore.

    • @BrianSpears-h4n
      @BrianSpears-h4n 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ai won't be sentient for another 5 years, so this is incorrect. NONE of ai's content is original. @@joshuajames1720

    • @Meniar_Hanchi
      @Meniar_Hanchi 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Excellent point of view

    • @debangshupaul28
      @debangshupaul28 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly! I mean google grew so big because it is not only providing us with search, but also enabling businesses to reach out to people which is why businesses are eager to publish in google, it is like growing together. When this is being done (read stolen) by AI search, why would people give their data for free to them? sure, you made one side of the problem easier, but you made the other side of the problem worse. And search is not only about reading articles, but also about searching, searching for companies, businesses, people and so many things.

  • @weho_brian
    @weho_brian 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +143

    youtube on its own is worth +500bln, Google is going nowhere

    • @estring123
      @estring123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      google is going under 100 bucks, watch

    • @PeterSedesse
      @PeterSedesse 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Goggle is going nowhere, but google search is dead.

    • @weho_brian
      @weho_brian 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PeterSedesse Chatgpt is trained on historical data and cannot tell you the weather for the next 2 weeks, or where the best chinese restaurants are 5 miles away. Google will find a way to combine Google Search and AGI into a comprehensive real time AI system

    • @jungchang3227
      @jungchang3227 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@estring123after the recent earnings report? All Imma say is your brain might be a little slow.

    • @estring123
      @estring123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jungchang3227 google is going the way of T, watch

  • @EthnosSynergyEnergy
    @EthnosSynergyEnergy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    More than Google searches, we need a major TH-cam competitor

    • @leonr1985
      @leonr1985 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In your wet dreams

    • @Phar2Rekliss
      @Phar2Rekliss 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We need competitors with no chat police and violating your first amendment rights to say what you want to say and people have to read your messages

    • @LifesGood-nu6rd
      @LifesGood-nu6rd 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Rumble

  • @ImBeneficial
    @ImBeneficial 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

    The fact Google is the Verb for search, speaks mountains.

    • @PeterSedesse
      @PeterSedesse 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Google search instantly replaced 10+ search engine's when it was introduced because it was vastly superior. Excite, Alta Vista, Lycos and even Yahoo... Perplexity is that much better than google search that it will do the same thing. Or think of it this way...we still say ' dial ' a phone, even though nobody has actually dialed a phone in 30 years.

    • @antoniusivan8767
      @antoniusivan8767 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Now, it's chat gpt. Faster, simpler, no advertising.
      No hidden cost supplemented by ads.

    • @theadvocate4698
      @theadvocate4698 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Kodak and blockbuster too were big names....

    • @idontmindifisaid
      @idontmindifisaid 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True. But to monetized it is another story. Online ads is the way to monetize. @@antoniusivan8767

    • @hannah60000
      @hannah60000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@theadvocate4698 Bing is awful, yes even with an AI chat box.

  • @DarkMeyer777
    @DarkMeyer777 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    As long as the search engine retrieves results based on:
    First: who paid the most.
    Second: almost the top ten results are ADs.
    Honestly its not becoming a web but more like a World Wide advertising platform

  • @helix1061
    @helix1061 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Language-based AI is still not entirely reliable, and it responds based on the bias of who trains it. It's possible to feed it false or biased info and it will respond accordingly. based on my understanding.

    • @wonmoreminute
      @wonmoreminute 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That will, and has, become less of a problem. Larger models are on the way, as well as fine tuned models. However, there’s a bigger problem. It’s no longer financially viable to create properly researched high quality content.
      I and countless others used to spend thousands of dollars researching, hiring experts, buying and testing products, travelling for research, doing case studies, and on and on to provide the web with valuable content. And we could do it because we could monetize it and it was profitable. But that’s no longer the case.
      The companies mentioned here like Perplexity as well as Google SGE, scrape that content and deliver it directly to searchers so human eyes never read the original content. At the same time, countless content creators are using bulk AI writing tools to copy and spin 1000s of articles at a time and flood the web with redundant information, diluting the original information.
      So whether AI is reliable enough to produce the answers people are looking for is irrelevant when producing the original content is unsustainable. None of us can afford to just feed AI with properly researched content so that an AI company like Perplexity can monetize our work.

    • @lesliemercado8032
      @lesliemercado8032 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      possibly false, biased and COPIED output.
      Google just presents what's on the internet. the user analyzes options and decides which data suits him.

    • @johndalzell904
      @johndalzell904 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's true it can be unreliable, especially if you ask for anything deeper than a brief summary. There was a recent court case (Roberto Mata v Avianca) where the lawyers used ChatGPT to find relevant case law. But ChatGPT made up all its supporting cases. It was much worse than just finding irrelevant cases, they were all fictional! The lawyers failed to double check and were badly embarrassed in court when the judge chewed them out. It even goes wrong with the sciences like medicine, math & engineering.

    • @chetan_naik
      @chetan_naik 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Entire internet is biased one way or the other. Google doesn't have magic wand to find objective truth from the internet data.

    • @skepsys
      @skepsys 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i'd say "not entirely reliable" is more like a british understatement..

  • @thruknobulaxii2020
    @thruknobulaxii2020 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Ohhh. It seems so unfair. Since they have been such responsible custodians of all that power.
    Never abused the access we’ve given them, always been transparent about their activities, never predatory in their business practices.
    I would cheer if I didn’t believe their replacement will be even worse.

  • @Wak-Amol
    @Wak-Amol 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    The next generation is done for when they be using TikTok as their main search engine. We better start from scratch again 🙃

    • @kusali11
      @kusali11 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      People also only search on TH-cam.

    • @_surreal99
      @_surreal99 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      My thoughts exactly. And that person is so proud about it.

    • @wolfpack6026
      @wolfpack6026 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s what I thought 😂😂😂😂 freakin‘ stupid TikTok Users 💩

    • @hannah60000
      @hannah60000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, once I heard that nonsense - I knew this was partially a non-story

    • @hannah60000
      @hannah60000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kusali11 Not really, YT is geared to operate as a search function like Google. People tend to go to TH-cam to learn how to do things. Also, when one is looking for a quick answer watching a 3 minute plus video doesn’t assist with getting the answers the way a Google search will.

  • @stevenzheng5459
    @stevenzheng5459 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Did Perplexity pay CNBC to advertise on TH-cam?

    • @debangshupaul28
      @debangshupaul28 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      even I was wondering the same 🤣

  • @TakeshiYoung
    @TakeshiYoung 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    AI is not great for search for most queries, at least not yet. Sometimes you want 10 blue links, not an AI hallucination. TikTok and changing youth search behavior is a bigger threat.

    • @sungjane
      @sungjane 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Huawei and TikTok are both manufactured in Communist China. Is the next generation in the United States learning Chinese?"

  • @ironaleks7617
    @ironaleks7617 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Use ai search websites, until you realize they all use google in the background 😂

  • @Dabbidoo
    @Dabbidoo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Interesting. I've definitely been using AI tools more frequently and not relying solely on Google search only. I guess I am not the only one.
    I also hate more and more how Google search delivers the results: more advertising or sponsored related results, or a list of words or phrases, which is annoying or frustrating.

    • @sungjane
      @sungjane 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Huawei and TikTok are both manufactured in Communist China. Is the next generation in the United States learning Chinese?"

  • @Jayflydrones
    @Jayflydrones 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I knew google would go down hill when they got greedy and started putting 4 sponsored links on top AND bottom of search results page

  • @d.phillips4214
    @d.phillips4214 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Why would somebody use ticktock to search for information, when half of the information on tick-tock is incorrect?

    • @thegreatestcrashbandicootf8864
      @thegreatestcrashbandicootf8864 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Me too wonders. They just want to promote Tiktok. That's it. But Google Search wouldn't end. Period. They couldn't even perform close to Google.

  • @emaljaan6028
    @emaljaan6028 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Even the news is garbage these days. They use Tiktok to find something interesting and then claim Google search is not good based on some Tiktokers review? Google will always be top and Microsoft can dance to their music as always!

  • @MartinHicks-dw2su
    @MartinHicks-dw2su 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +427

    Every week I buy more of whatever is the lowest percentage of my portfolio and try to keep everything around 10%. Please what could be my safest buys with $400k to outperform the market in 2024?

    • @rodgertim2881
      @rodgertim2881 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would avoid the index funds, mutual funds, or specific stocks for the time being. The 5% fixed incomes are the safest bet for now. Save your cash for when the market actually shows sign of recovery.

    • @JamesParson-u1h
      @JamesParson-u1h 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is why l've entrusted a fiduciary with my investmnt decisions. Many underestimate advisors until emotions lead to losses. My advisor crafted a tailored strategy aligning with my long-term goals, guiding entry and exit points for the equities I focus on. This has grown my portfolio to over $850k. My personal best so far

    • @finnnagner1755
      @finnnagner1755 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How can I participate in this? I sincerely aspire to establish a secure financial future and am eager to participate. Who is the advisor behind your success?.

    • @cherylhills3227
      @cherylhills3227 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      CARL JASON COHEN is the licensed fiduciary I use.
      Just research the name. You'd find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.

    • @cherylhills3227
      @cherylhills3227 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can GOOGLE HIS NAME

  • @shwnshts9469
    @shwnshts9469 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have never clicked on an ad seen on Google search and then purchased a product. Idk why wasting money is an industry

  • @snowy7236
    @snowy7236 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Google Ad Revenue Up 11% & Bing Ads Revenue Up 8% for Q4

    • @davychai9516
      @davychai9516 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's true, But alphabet makes money from Google ads Mostly. However. Being ads. Barely contributes to microsoft's revenue. Not fair to compare one's Main business to the other's Side gig.

  • @cuthomas4664
    @cuthomas4664 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Google is killing itself because of Ad, everywhere in the first result page, making it a less reliable as a tool. And wait for it, the SEO by AI is coming!

  • @ScreenProductions
    @ScreenProductions 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    After the EMP I’ll be #1 again!
    -Encyclopedia Britannica

    • @sudeepkumarsatpathy6104
      @sudeepkumarsatpathy6104 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Grime picture, guess it’s inevitable.

    • @therealarien
      @therealarien 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Being back the Encarta 95 cd rom that came with windows 95!😂

    • @wonmoreminute
      @wonmoreminute 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@therealarienI’m sure I’ve got that CD kicking around in a box somewhere 😂

  • @dennismorris7573
    @dennismorris7573 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Good report. Precision in a search engine is what is missing - it will be better for the search and provide the user a learning platform that will make the user think and be smarter (the opposite of what much of technology is doing today).

    • @zvxcvxcz
      @zvxcvxcz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The problem is that AI isn't going to increase the precision. It's going to be an even fuzzier mess driven by trends of others. It's further in the same problem direction that Google has been taking.

    • @johnc3525
      @johnc3525 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I prefer to have to navigate Google results than get a canned answer for most topics I search.

  • @marting6015
    @marting6015 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    google search is still the best search engine. bing is really thrash and other browsers really can't compare to chrome. chat gpt is also limited in what it can do and people have started noticing. Bard AI has a chance right now to take over. Not to mention google will be integrating it's AI to it's mobile phones which I think eventually will give it the lead.

  • @trusty099
    @trusty099 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    You're out of your mind.

    • @veronica2764
      @veronica2764 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly!! Click bite video!

    • @HeroDai2448
      @HeroDai2448 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Chad google vs the other virgin knock off search engines

  • @KingStix
    @KingStix 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i'd rather than sit through ads or use a privacy browser than deal with bing or edge, microsoft trying to default jam these down consumers throat for over a decade has left an irreversible bad taste in my mouth. I won't use microsoft games or voice chat,

  • @djpopcorn
    @djpopcorn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    TH-cam is also terrible for searching. It's always the SAME most popular searches. And there are no advanced TH-cam searches. Finding the "underdog" videos is nearly impossible unless you scroll and scroll and scroll.😂

    • @misterfunnybones
      @misterfunnybones 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You've gotta run the filters to find anything recent; otherwise, they're sending you to the ten most memed vids in last ten years whether you searched for avocados or zooplankton.

    • @djpopcorn
      @djpopcorn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@misterfunnybones The filters? 😂 Those don't do much.

    • @djpopcorn
      @djpopcorn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@misterfunnybones View count filter, just puts the top watched videos on top, so I have to scroll through even more junk
      😂

    • @djpopcorn
      @djpopcorn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@misterfunnybones And Rating? I have no idea what that does.
      So there you have it.The four "advanced" search filters. 😂😂😂

    • @djpopcorn
      @djpopcorn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@misterfunnybones Oh, and relevance? 😂 That's a joke. That's the default search..And there's nothing relevant about the results. Instead it's the MOST popular channels and videos where TH-cam is monetized and the channels, most blow hot air. 😂

  • @andreinedelcu5330
    @andreinedelcu5330 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you put 15 slightly related bits one after another you get a CNBC news story.

  • @AA_OnTheEdge
    @AA_OnTheEdge 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    when you search ski resort on google map , and it just pop up a bunch of hotel with paid pop up priority

  • @cameronweston1762
    @cameronweston1762 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ok so 1% of outliers use other search platforms. That’s not news

  • @weird-guy
    @weird-guy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Imo it’s true that google search is worse but they still get better results than bing at least in my language the blame is in seo optimization with bs article and repetitive information that we don’t know is true or not, despite a high userbase most people don’t even know what chat gpt is also they know the term a.i but don’t know what it means or exactly what it is

  • @Me_Caveman
    @Me_Caveman 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If I'm looking for a useful answer, I don't use Google either. They haven't been able to search properly in years.

  • @portcybertryx222
    @portcybertryx222 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I was quite impressed with how Bing also summarises answers with GpT 4

    • @sungjane
      @sungjane 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Huawei and TikTok are both manufactured in Communist China. Is the next generation in the United States learning Chinese?"

  • @BabylonBaller
    @BabylonBaller 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I've noticed the same thing, search has really sucked these past few months

  • @youtoob140
    @youtoob140 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Aint nobody beating google

    • @HeroDai2448
      @HeroDai2448 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This is just FUD and BS

    • @wonmoreminute
      @wonmoreminute 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Ain’t nobody beating Kodak, and Blockbuster, and Nokia, and The Yellow Pages, and TV Guide, and Circuit City, and Tower Records…

    • @darinherrick9224
      @darinherrick9224 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@wonmoreminuteChevrolet, ford, bell telephone, blackberry, IBM...

    • @over50andfantabulous59
      @over50andfantabulous59 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My Space.@@wonmoreminute

  • @focused313
    @focused313 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Those other browsers seem to be "stealing" data from websites and giving it right to the end user.

  • @k.h.6991
    @k.h.6991 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I tried bing the other day, but switched right back to Google, over result quality. Sure, Google is losing some search traffic, but it's still the dominant player.

  • @BryanEnsign
    @BryanEnsign 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Reddit is the best place to find honest reliable information until AI perfects its hallucinations.

    • @jaysant6958
      @jaysant6958 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah. I like that most answers are from everyday people rather than articles from a company promoting its own services.

  • @SidGolan
    @SidGolan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Perplexity? Lol it’ll be dead by the end of the year.

    • @HeroDai2448
      @HeroDai2448 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dead by arrival

  • @duanekunsinda4485
    @duanekunsinda4485 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Guess what? I still google search and Google search aint going anywhere anytime soon

  • @sebutindechris
    @sebutindechris 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Is this an ad for other companies

    • @jaysant6958
      @jaysant6958 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Finally found a comment that thinks this too.

  • @PirnazarovDostonbek
    @PirnazarovDostonbek 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Save 10 minutes. At the first half of the video she argues people are moving on from google, on the other half she shows nearly there has not been change.

  • @bobwin1307
    @bobwin1307 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This Google CEO is driving the business downward. I don’t understand where did he go wrong when comes to AI? Google should have been the first in AI. It is kind of stupid that google is laying off employees to meet the earnings. It’s saying that the company is not improving.

    • @YSKWatch
      @YSKWatch 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      probably he put less capable people in the team for whatever reason. their product development are weak or heading to the wrong direction.

  • @armencc
    @armencc 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Search and LLM have different purposes. Bard summarizes general things found online, but search takes you to the source. The former is fine for basic things, but for most things I want read it from the source.

  • @peterbrooke8207
    @peterbrooke8207 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Yippie Alternatives to Crappy Google.. Now we need an alternativer to Crap TH-cam.

  • @nazufani4016
    @nazufani4016 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Seriously folk, turn down or off the music. Your show is NOT a musical. Your show is about facts & that google sucks. & I mean that in the nicest possible way.
    ☮️💖🌻

  • @freds8482
    @freds8482 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    How does CNBC honestly puts an human being on the show which says “I also use Tik Tok as Google” like what the hell man. This generation is done, terminal damage.

    • @PeterSedesse
      @PeterSedesse 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you are a young person who wants to eat at a new trendy restaurant, of course tik tok is an option. Or do you want to find a list of restaurants on Google written by a 60 year old newspaper reviewer? The same if you are looking for trendy boots, you want Google to just show you which boot manufacture paid the most for ads? Or do you want to see someone your age who's boots clip went viral? A huge portion of searches are not academic. I think Google loses on both sides, the trendy social stuff with TikTok, and the academic stuff with perplexity.

  • @Supt3100
    @Supt3100 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very interesting & informative. Thanks, CNBC!

  • @PeterParker-wj3cr
    @PeterParker-wj3cr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    What happen to the hype around bing?

    • @jainicz
      @jainicz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's better, especially with the AI Chat powered by GPT4. They also giving out gift cards up to $100 simply by keep using it.

  • @novelist5380
    @novelist5380 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The idea that tiktok could replace google as a search engine is hilarious. Someone show me where I can find scientific papers on Tiktok.

  • @anunaysanganal
    @anunaysanganal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    What these "experts" fail to realize is Tech Giant like Google can't release half baked products, especially LLMs which still have so many issues like hallucinations, biases, etc. Search is their main product. Imagine if Google goes and releases a half baked product and it starts spitting out offensive results, these "experts" will then start critizing Google for moving too quickly 😂😂

    • @flubnub266
      @flubnub266 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree, but just so you know, web search is no longer Google's main service. Advertising is now by far their main source of revenue. I think it's important for people to be aware of that.

    • @Sonic_the_hedgedog
      @Sonic_the_hedgedog 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Google released *Stadia* , which was a half baked product. They're not a perfect company. Don't forget that Google sometimes releases bad/half baked products such as Google Plus+ (failed social media platform).

  • @eingoluq
    @eingoluq 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Google hasn't been useful in over 7 years now. and people are now noticing? been using bing exclusively because of how spammy Google has been.

    • @investfoxy
      @investfoxy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wrong..

    • @eingoluq
      @eingoluq 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@investfoxy nope.

  • @BrianLee5
    @BrianLee5 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Using Tiktok for search??????

    • @HeroDai2448
      @HeroDai2448 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What did you expect from gen z?

  • @kabelolive
    @kabelolive 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Obviously this is a paid PR, but it's awesome!

  • @ruudm3615
    @ruudm3615 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    As long as the most searched term on Bing is Google, I don’t worry

  • @Mark_Cywinski
    @Mark_Cywinski 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    AltaVista also was big, until Google showed up. The game was lost for AV because G was faster on it's time and new customers got on it. Behavior was created.
    True, G is on every cellphone, but this is only because other systems are blocked from entering the market. Jolla does not sell to North America. Harmony OS in not present here either. With more systems on the market than Android or iOS, competition in the field would grow. Of course decades long monopolies like Apple or Alphabet do not like it, which is why we still use Google search.

  • @BigOrangeMan
    @BigOrangeMan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One thing I notice using bing and google extensively in the last few months, google is better for simple searches and bing(chat) is better for more complex search queries, still my default is google but there is always bing chat tab open.

  • @smashdriven1640
    @smashdriven1640 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Google search somehow gets worse and worse at finding what you’re looking for every year.

  • @seashackf1
    @seashackf1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We actually have more access to info than ever before, yet some people are actually less informed than ever before. They get lazy and just rely on tech to do everything for them. They also go to limited sources they choose for info. We’ve seen when you only use one source or very biased sources for news you’ve actually less informed because you never get the whole picture, only one side. If AI is giving you far less options or answers that’s exactly what it’s doing. Who then is deciding what side of the story or info you get? Is it a company or your own personal choice? Either way, what is that choice based on? That company or a persons political leanings, view toward medical advice (pharma vs homeopathic), financial interests, products to sell, etc. Who’s choosing what info your search result shows you can have can have major consequences.

  • @SriRama7832
    @SriRama7832 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Disclaimer: This Video is Sponsored by Perplexity Search Engine.😂😂😂

  • @ChibiKeruchan
    @ChibiKeruchan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    they obviously not sponsored coz they are unknown search engine that's why.
    just wait until their name become huge and businesses start coming to their company get reservations.
    but for now these new search engine companies are doing great and you should use them too. just don't expect them to be the same in the next 5yrs.

  • @TheKarelians
    @TheKarelians 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    These people have no idea what they are talking about. Google’s generative AI is better than open AI

  • @davidtothemax1
    @davidtothemax1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's 2099...robot version of this lady is posting another hologram inforgraphic about the end of Google search

  • @michaelsonsarmiento5943
    @michaelsonsarmiento5943 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The one thing you can't google is what you should be looking up.

  • @vareseources
    @vareseources 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No way.. the people complaining are ignorant and don't know how to use Google Search.

  • @iggytse
    @iggytse 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We noticed at the company I work at the younger demographic was using Tik Tok to search for things. I just find that insane but it’s happening. Why no other social media platform had this influence on search I have no idea.

  • @ohdearearthlings1879
    @ohdearearthlings1879 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Chat GPT - Bing is so censored and afraid to give answers, that Google eats it. I play with Chat GPT a little for sport and often try Google for similar information. In practice, if I have a practical need, Google and TH-cam crack it. Sometimes Google is a little cluttered, but this is usually able to be solved.

  • @MohammedAlNashwan
    @MohammedAlNashwan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great report. 🏆Many thanks.

  • @uroscadez
    @uroscadez 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    this statement says it all...'I also use TikTok like Google... to search for anything."..oh man what nonsense is this

  • @vijayswamy1250
    @vijayswamy1250 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I find better results searching through Reddit than a simple google search for many of my questions.

  • @SeanWork
    @SeanWork 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    People don't always want just one answer. People (and consumers) do like to conduct research and compare info. There will always be a place for search engines. But spoon fed AI answers will certainly be addictive.

  • @ram_the_goat4680
    @ram_the_goat4680 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Fun fact: GPT- Generative Pretrained *Transformers*. Transformers is a class of neutral networks conjured by Google’s researchers. I bet they never thought their own invention can come back to bite them in the butt.

  • @marissagerena8329
    @marissagerena8329 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What for we, have meta, the new technology on Microsoft data, we need search on Google, it's very important.

  • @rollinkendal8130
    @rollinkendal8130 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i just can't imagine all the ads required to pay the overhead of AI searches.

  • @JJs_playground
    @JJs_playground 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Google also invented the T part in chatGPT, Transformers. But they did dropped the ball by not releasing a chatbot first.
    Similar to Kodak back in the 1970, one of their engineers created the first 1megapixel digital camera, but they shelved it. And now Kodak is basically nothing.

  • @nicaskitt650
    @nicaskitt650 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    >searches on laptop.
    >recording of mobile screen

  • @Otherlevel51
    @Otherlevel51 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Google has to much ads and seo. Which mean when you search for something you get an ad first and a website with great SEO second.
    The answer you really want isn't there.

  • @debangshupaul28
    @debangshupaul28 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    why does this feel like an ad for perplexity ? I mean sure google search is not the best lately but I still use it for searching.
    There is a huge problem with the AI based generative search, that since they give answers directly they are essentially gathering content form websites instead of pointing users into them(giving credits is not the same thing), this might not be ideal for them and they may eventually oppose these search engines to crawl their pages, where will these search engines bring data from then?

  • @MountyCrizto
    @MountyCrizto 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ungrateful people huh how many times Google served you 😂😂😂