Some years ago, my Dad was friends with a 'retired' gunsmith. When this gunsmith ran a shop, he had a customer come in with a Mauser 712 that was shooting poorly. Upon being asked what ammo he was shooting, the customer presented a box of domestic 9X19; his pistol was 7.63... Apparently, the customer had fed two successive clips of 9X19 through the Mauser before deciding that there was a problem. Our gunsmith, familiar with the C96 series of pistols, could find no damage. I think that we can conclude that these are TOUGH pistols! I'm very glad that You didn't have a catastrophic failure / injury!
One of the advantages of good old fashioned design from the late 1800's and early 1900's; it was made to last. A modern pistol would have exploded but this old boy just yeeted the bullet straight thru the barrel flattening it in the process. This is kind of a meme but not really seeing as they really did emphasize the durability and ruggedness of their products back then. This thing was called a box-cannon in China and in many ways, it really is a miniature hand-held cannon machined out of a solid block of steel. I'm currently waiting for a C96 that I bought online to arrive, though I must say I won't be trying your little experiment myself. :D
Ennen muinoin tehtiin kaikki kestämään, nämä ovat sotatyökaluja ei riisikuppi peltotyökaluja. Hieno sivusto kaikenkaikkiaan, ei turhaa paskanjauhantaa, asiaa niin kuin liukuhihnalta, korvat lepää ilman omg bullsihittiä. Kiitos!
The barrel will have been severely stressed and I would have suggested getting it proof tested before using again.. You have been using it since so I guess you were lucky and the Mauser is a tough pistol...
I am German, but an American friend of mine got a 7.63mm Mauser as a present from a friend of his. He didn’t know it was 7.63mm and started shooting it with 9 mil. He complained about poor accuracy a couple of times, but proceeded shooting it with 9x19mm for another month or two without ever checking the gun itself. (don’t ask me why though. When I ask him, he always rolls his eyes and starts talking about having been an idiot.) Some day he finally went to a gunsmith that could immediately tell him what the issue was. He also checked the on the gun and couldn’t find anything. He (the gunsmith) then allegedly mumbled: „You could probably shoot it with 9 millimeter Parabellum for as long as you want. That gun is a fucking beast!“ So basically, does that mean you can shoot 9mm through a 7.63mm pistol without damaging it? Would be worth an endurance test…
Typically "proof testing" is just firing a round loaded to a specifically higher chamber pressure that the firearm was designed for. I would say that the owner in this case "proof tested" his chamber just fine, as I'm sure the pressure generated by extruding a 9mm into 7.63mm causes some seriously high pressures.
Glad to hear that you're safe and the gun wasn't damaged in the process! You have a nice Mauser C96 in beautiful condition. Is the shoulder stock original and matching numbers to the gun by any chance? Thank you.
The pistol functioned like an sPzB 41 anti-tank gun, the projectile is 28mm in the chamber, and 20mm at the muzzle, there was a Belgian prototype rifle called Gerlich XPL, and chambered in .505 Gibbs, functioning the same way, the projectile is .505 caliber in the chamber, and .323 like an 8mm Mauser at the muzzle.
Several years ago I read an interesting discussion on one of the forums about the mysterious "experimental" Mausers C96 in caliber 8.15 mm, which sometimes appear on sale. In the discussion, the opinion was justified that these 8.15 mm Mausers are actually 7.63mm pistols from which 9mm cartridges were fired. Here's a quote from that discussion: "I have come to the conclusion that when a 9mm parabellum round is fired through a 7.63mm C96, the residual barrel diameter will be right around 8.15mm. I have had this theory for several years and believe it to be correct. Whenever I have examined an 8.15mm C96, there has always been a very slight bulge near the chamber, and it can be very, very slight, so as to be un-noticeable to the untrained eye. ... I have thought about conducting an experiment myself to verify my hypothesis, but have not been able to get around to it. WWI era lead rounds would be the desired ammunition for such an experiment rather than modern day copper-jacketed ones." .
I bought a Mauser C96 7.63 pistol from a company called Oyster Bay that was converting these into the more popular 9 mm back in the mid-eighties, by reaming out the barrel and rifling it to the slightly larger 9 mm. It did not function correctly, constantly jamming when feeding, showing how closely these gun's action tolerances must be. The gun shop owner I bought it from refunded me after the company accepted a return, kept it for two weeks, then shipped it back out, still jamming. He recommended i just buy a proper 9 mm newer version, which were twice as expensive.
In the Belford and Dunlap book on the Mauser C96 there is a picture of a C96 with a Luger barrel in 7.65 Parabellum, with "SA" markings - a Finnish contract pistol. I know Finnish contracts included both 7.63 and 9mm, but I wonder how many 7.65 Parabellum ones were made. Probably very few!
Kannattaisi varmaan käyttää mauseria pyssysepällä tarkastettavana, ennen kuin jatkaa sillä ampumista. On ihan hyvin voinut tulla mikroskooppisia murtumia, jotka heikentää piippua huomattavasti.
Hämmästyttävää, että Mauser kesti. C96 ei ole rakenteellisesti tukevimmasta päästä. Mutta papukaija merkki Mauserille ja Jussille ympäri korvia huolimattomuudesta. Toisaalta pointsit rehellisyydestä, kun myönsit mokasi.
On siinä sulku ollut kovilla, kun hylsynkanta tuuppaa lukkoa taaksepäin ja piippuun tunkeva luoti piippu-luisti -pakettia eteenpäin. Melkein luulisin että vaurioita tulisi ennemmin kytkinkappaleeseen tai lukon sulkuolakkeeseen kuin piippuun.
Just to remind everyone. A German P08 Luger fires 30 cal bottleneck known as 7.65 ( Five) a round as long as a 9mm parabellum. A Mauser fires a longer bottleneck round 7.63 (three) which will allow the short 9mm to load and seat in the breech chamber area below the chamber bottleneck.
Is there a way to tell if your C96 is chambered for 7.63 or 9mm? There are some 1930s commercial versions of the C96 out there that are chambered for 9mm but there's no markings to tell unlike a Red 9 version.
But how can you be sure what caliber it is? Can you fit the 9mm trough the barrel or something, if you have one reassembled and you don't know who the previous owner was how can I know, There is written on it so shitty
honestly it gets to the point where you wouldn't want to, similar to how 9mm p++ shouldn't be shot out of a luger or something using very low ww2 based powered loadings vs 9mm modern revamped loadings. Basic metallurgy becomes the problem i'd guess.
Olisin kuvitellut että pyssy hajoaa heti. Ehkä mieto lataus pelasti paljon ja onneakin oli mukana. Silloin tällöin kuulee tarinoita vääristä patruunoista ja läheltäpiti tilanteista joissa vanhatkin aseet ovat kestäneet kunnialla.
That's a myth that has been long debunked. It came from the Bulgarian early 70's made 7.62 ammo that was made too hot for even the CZ52 pistols. The ammo powder was also sub par and as it got about 10 years old the surplus ammo would get hotter after the chemical breakdown of the powder. There were several other countries in the Com Bloc that this happened to so it is advised not to shoot it in the Mauser unless you know the manufacturer and years made. The Bulgarian ammo is also known as "Pink Ammo" because the separating paper in the box is pink distinguishing from other manufacturers and no matter year made should be avoided at all costs in your Mauser. The original specs on the 7.63 Mauser is Bullet weight 86 Gr FMJ with factory load, Muzzle Velocity 1,410 fps, Muzzle Energy 375 FP's. The 7.62 Tokarev specs are Bullet weight 87 Gr FMJ with factory load, Muzzle Velocity 1,390 fps, Muzzle Energy 365 FP's. There is a whole book out now about this myth. My source is "Cartridges of The World" Page 222, 30 (7.63x25mm) mauser and page 221, 7.62x25mm Russian Tokarev.
@@bad74maverick1 so what I am reading is that I can shoot 7.62 tokorev in my c96 if I know where and when the ammo was manufactured. My c96 was made in 1910 with 6 groves of rifling instead of 4.
@@hunters36forgingwoodworkin73 Yes that is correct. You have to be SURE of your ammo. I still err on the side of caution and generally don't shoot it in mine because I have so much of it. If I have good production ammo like Chech ammo I will use it. What I am saying is that myth has been busted. There was a run of Yugo ammo that is a bit warmer. I would shoot NO, ABSOLUTELY NO Bulgarian ammo in mine. Pink wrapper or not!!!!!!! Another problem the C96 has isn't necessarily the ammo, its the wear on the pistols themselves. If it has excessive wear then any ammo can "Batter" the gun until failure, that's why I swapped all my springs for new made ones. I still suggest Sellier and Bellot ammo designated for the 7.63 Mauser. But yes, if confident and after research and education if you have com bloc ammo with a good reputation, it will shoot just fine. Just do your research. That ammo was designed to be shot out of a 4.7" barrel so the longer barrel of the C96 which is 5.5" is going to be negligible where pressure is concerned. the 6 groove rifling should actually help with accuracy with some of the com bloc stuff with bullet stabilization. You MUST be sure of your ammo!!! I am posting this merely to dispel the myth of the 7.62 being different than the 7.63. Originally they were designed the same. There were certain blocs of mis-manufactured ammo which caused this debate to start.
Siinä kohtaa insinöörityö on pettänyt ja pahasti, syyteoikeus lienee kuitenkin jo vanhentunut. Vaikka sattuu sitä paremmissakin piireissä, 9mm panoksen voi ladata .40 kaliberin puoliautomaattiin sekä lippaaseen että aseeseen ja se laukeaa, tosin siinä tilanne on luodin koon kanssa toisinpäin.
mottee Tuli kerran vahingossa testattua tämä, kun omistan CZ TS:n kaliiberissa 9mm ja .40S&W. 9mm hylsy pullistui, muttei revennyt. 9mm luoti falskaa niin paljon .40 piipussa, että paineet eivät juurikaan pääse nousemaan.
Mä olen kanssa kerran ampunut .40 STI Edgestä 9mm patruunan. Epäilisin, että poimin väärän patruunan edelliseltä stagelta, luullen sitä omakseni ja laitoin sen päälle lippaasen lisää oikeita patruunoita. Kaikeksi onneksi ko. laukaus oli seuraavan stagen viimeinen, ja sekin (turha) paikko, joten pesään jääneestä hylsystä ei ollut suurempaa haittaa. Ulosvetäjä ei siis saanut hylsyn reunasta kiinni, vaan paisunut hylsy jäi pesään. Luoti oli poistunut luonnollista reittiä, muttei tainnut osua n 10m päässä olleeseen SRA-tauluun.
Meanwhile people are telling me I can't fire 7.62 Tokarev 😝 Not that I would, but this is hilarious. I've never even heard of a bullet simply flattening out to the right dimensions after being forced through an undersized bore, conventional wisdom says your gun would blow up or at least stovepipe catastrophically.
what was all that stuff that flew out the first shot? looks like extra rounds but somehow it chambered another! you are lucky i'd never have thought a 9mm would squeeze through a 7.62 chambered barrel.
He said it wasn’t hitting like it should, also it was ejecting weird and sounded much different than it did with the proper ammunition. I would assume the recoil would be different, too.
Some years ago, my Dad was friends with a 'retired' gunsmith. When this gunsmith ran a shop, he had a customer come in with a Mauser 712 that was shooting poorly. Upon being asked what ammo he was shooting, the customer presented a box of domestic 9X19; his pistol was 7.63... Apparently, the customer had fed two successive clips of 9X19 through the Mauser before deciding that there was a problem. Our gunsmith, familiar with the C96 series of pistols, could find no damage. I think that we can conclude that these are TOUGH pistols! I'm very glad that You didn't have a catastrophic failure / injury!
Now you know what happens when a LUCKY man shot 9 mm bullet through 7.63 hole.
You dont want to know what happens when UNLUCKY man does the same.
Thank you Master!
One of the advantages of good old fashioned design from the late 1800's and early 1900's; it was made to last. A modern pistol would have exploded but this old boy just yeeted the bullet straight thru the barrel flattening it in the process. This is kind of a meme but not really seeing as they really did emphasize the durability and ruggedness of their products back then. This thing was called a box-cannon in China and in many ways, it really is a miniature hand-held cannon machined out of a solid block of steel. I'm currently waiting for a C96 that I bought online to arrive, though I must say I won't be trying your little experiment myself. :D
"Aahh ... A choice of an Avid gun collector.
Its a nice gun stranger..."
Thank you for your honesty!
A true squeeze bore weapon. There is a moral to this story. When under enough pressure we all will conform to the situation.
I've watched this a couple of times and wanted to thank you for posting the warning.
Upea pistooli. Se on Mies joka virheensä myöntää, ja niistä oppii. Opettavaisia videoita
Ennen muinoin tehtiin kaikki kestämään, nämä ovat sotatyökaluja ei riisikuppi peltotyökaluja. Hieno sivusto kaikenkaikkiaan, ei turhaa paskanjauhantaa, asiaa niin kuin liukuhihnalta, korvat lepää ilman omg bullsihittiä. Kiitos!
1:58 is it just me or it ejected two cases at the same time (one extracted from the chamber and a full round from the magazine)?
I noticed that as well.
wow. That shows everyone that c96 is a very safe handgun. Even when shooting a more powerfull and bigger bullet it still handled it no problem.
The barrel will have been severely stressed and I would have suggested getting it proof tested before using again.. You have been using it since so I guess you were lucky and the Mauser is a tough pistol...
It was afterwards thoroughly and microscopically inspected by a competent gunsmith. Nada.
I am German, but an American friend of mine got a 7.63mm Mauser as a present from a friend of his. He didn’t know it was 7.63mm and started shooting it with 9 mil. He complained about poor accuracy a couple of times, but proceeded shooting it with 9x19mm for another month or two without ever checking the gun itself. (don’t ask me why though. When I ask him, he always rolls his eyes and starts talking about having been an idiot.) Some day he finally went to a gunsmith that could immediately tell him what the issue was. He also checked the on the gun and couldn’t find anything. He (the gunsmith) then allegedly mumbled: „You could probably shoot it with 9 millimeter Parabellum for as long as you want. That gun is a fucking beast!“
So basically, does that mean you can shoot 9mm through a 7.63mm pistol without damaging it? Would be worth an endurance test…
Typically "proof testing" is just firing a round loaded to a specifically higher chamber pressure that the firearm was designed for. I would say that the owner in this case "proof tested" his chamber just fine, as I'm sure the pressure generated by extruding a 9mm into 7.63mm causes some seriously high pressures.
@@vintagereloading8669 That's incredible 😯
I am glad that you are ok. Thank you for sharing this.
paras kohta oli se missä setä ampui 9mm pateja 7.63 pyssystä.
Ja naurattihan se :D
Kaksoisviivadeedee
Kantsii kattoo äkkii
Kiitos Mestari
Thanks be to God that you are ok and the weapon is unharmed.
Glad to hear that you're safe and the gun wasn't damaged in the process!
You have a nice Mauser C96 in beautiful condition. Is the shoulder stock original and matching numbers to the gun by any chance?
Thank you.
Whoooooo.... thanks for the info and so glad that did not have a catastrophic failure!
Holy FUCK! Thank GOD the Mauser was fine!
The pistol functioned like an sPzB 41 anti-tank gun, the projectile is 28mm in the chamber, and 20mm at the muzzle, there was a Belgian prototype rifle called Gerlich XPL, and chambered in .505 Gibbs, functioning the same way, the projectile is .505 caliber in the chamber, and .323 like an 8mm Mauser at the muzzle.
Several years ago I read an interesting discussion on one of the forums about the mysterious "experimental" Mausers C96 in caliber 8.15 mm, which sometimes appear on sale. In the discussion, the opinion was justified that these 8.15 mm Mausers are actually 7.63mm pistols from which 9mm cartridges were fired. Here's a quote from that discussion:
"I have come to the conclusion that when a 9mm parabellum round is fired through a 7.63mm C96, the residual barrel diameter will be right around 8.15mm. I have had this theory for several years and believe it to be correct. Whenever I have examined an 8.15mm C96, there has always been a very slight bulge near the chamber, and it can be very, very slight, so as to be un-noticeable to the untrained eye. ... I have thought about conducting an experiment myself to verify my hypothesis, but have not been able to get around to it. WWI era lead rounds would be the desired ammunition for such an experiment rather than modern day copper-jacketed ones." .
I bought a Mauser C96 7.63 pistol from a company called Oyster Bay that was converting these into the more popular 9 mm back in the mid-eighties, by reaming out the barrel and rifling it to the slightly larger 9 mm. It did not function correctly, constantly jamming when feeding, showing how closely these gun's action tolerances must be. The gun shop owner I bought it from refunded me after the company accepted a return, kept it for two weeks, then shipped it back out, still jamming. He recommended i just buy a proper 9 mm newer version, which were twice as expensive.
Kiitos mestari!
Oikea mies tunnustaa myös virheensä. Arvostan. Voisin kirjoittaa vielä muutaman rivin politiikasta ja vastakkaisista esimerkeistä, mutta olkoon...
In the Belford and Dunlap book on the Mauser C96 there is a picture of a C96 with a Luger barrel in 7.65 Parabellum, with "SA" markings - a Finnish contract pistol. I know Finnish contracts included both 7.63 and 9mm, but I wonder how many 7.65 Parabellum ones were made. Probably very few!
Gunshop, armory made. 7,65/30 Luger is not Mauser correct kaliber
Kannattaisi varmaan käyttää mauseria pyssysepällä tarkastettavana, ennen kuin jatkaa sillä ampumista. On ihan hyvin voinut tulla mikroskooppisia murtumia, jotka heikentää piippua huomattavasti.
Näin pitää tehdä.
Purin pyssyn kotona atomeiksi. Ei-aseseppä ei kyllä löydä siitä mitään näkyviä vaurioita, mitä voidaan pitää ihmeellisenä.
Hämmästyttävää, että Mauser kesti. C96 ei ole rakenteellisesti tukevimmasta päästä. Mutta papukaija merkki Mauserille ja Jussille ympäri korvia huolimattomuudesta. Toisaalta pointsit rehellisyydestä, kun myönsit mokasi.
On siinä sulku ollut kovilla, kun hylsynkanta tuuppaa lukkoa taaksepäin ja piippuun tunkeva luoti piippu-luisti -pakettia eteenpäin. Melkein luulisin että vaurioita tulisi ennemmin kytkinkappaleeseen tai lukon sulkuolakkeeseen kuin piippuun.
@@mottee Sulkukappale ja sen vastinpinnat ovat voineet kärsiä ylipaineesta. Ei ehkä murtua, mutta venyä. Kannattaa tutkia...
@@vintagereloading8669 Ammuitko kevytlatauksia vai täysitehoisia?
Some say older gun are more resistant but for the price of a c96 back then you could have a premium pistol now.
Just to remind everyone. A German P08 Luger fires 30 cal bottleneck known as 7.65 ( Five) a round as long as a 9mm parabellum. A Mauser fires a longer bottleneck round 7.63 (three) which will allow the short 9mm to load and seat in the breech chamber area below the chamber bottleneck.
Lucky man !!! You were not injured and the gun didn’t explode. Deutsche Qualität !
A compliment to the mauser, stands up to that abuse
Thank dome long dead mauser employee for making a strong g7n.
Olipa hyvä että mies selvisi säikähdyksellä ja ase rikkoutumattomana..👍
Made in Germany, it will never break!
Unless is Chinese copy
Is there a way to tell if your C96 is chambered for 7.63 or 9mm? There are some 1930s commercial versions of the C96 out there that are chambered for 9mm but there's no markings to tell unlike a Red 9 version.
Hole in the barrel 1.st
on ase sitten vanha mauser, ekat 10/22, tai ekat S&W model 29:t, ne on tehty kestämään :D
But how can you be sure what caliber it is?
Can you fit the 9mm trough the barrel or something, if you have one reassembled and you don't know who the previous owner was how can I know,
There is written on it so shitty
Jesus christ could've walked away with a face like Freddy Krueger.
Wow man;> Thanks for showing us.
Yeap I got pistol ammo
What caliber?
Pistol.
Ammo.
Is it possible fo fire 9 Luger using a CZ52 or a T33 so safely?
mauser quality lol incredible that the barrel is not damaged
So, there is no need to load russian 7,62 x 25 brass with weaker loads to use on a C96? Will the Mauser handle the russian round OK?
honestly it gets to the point where you wouldn't want to, similar to how 9mm p++ shouldn't be shot out of a luger or something using very low ww2 based powered loadings vs 9mm modern revamped loadings. Basic metallurgy becomes the problem i'd guess.
My brother-in-law tried the same thing with a 9mm into a 9mmkurz .. His good luck was it didn’t chamber properly, so gun didn’t fire!
next mistake to be made , load 7.62 tokarev into red 9 ; we wonder what will happen
Olisin kuvitellut että pyssy hajoaa heti. Ehkä mieto lataus pelasti paljon ja onneakin oli mukana.
Silloin tällöin kuulee tarinoita vääristä patruunoista ja läheltäpiti tilanteista joissa vanhatkin aseet ovat kestäneet kunnialla.
For sure no Khyber pass copy but real old German craftmanswork, but you are very lucky nothing happend....
Sattuu paremmissakin piireissä.
wait, is that the projectile I see shooting so slowly out the front?
Löysikö hylsyä? Olin huomaavani että aseesta lentää kerralla pari kappaletta yhden hylsyn sijasta, tai sitten näin väärin.
Ei löytynyt. Sieltä lensi sekä hylsy että makasiinissa päällimmäisenä ollut patruuna.
You were lucky that you used commercial 9mm Para, not steel cored military ones..
other than the incident with the nine in the mauser I laughed my ass off, some hiarious comentary
Aslo, I thought that the red 9 mousers were the 9mm ones and not the other way arround
I though this was a video about why you don’t shoot 7.62x 25 in a 7.63 x 25
That's a myth that has been long debunked. It came from the Bulgarian early 70's made 7.62 ammo that was made too hot for even the CZ52 pistols. The ammo powder was also sub par and as it got about 10 years old the surplus ammo would get hotter after the chemical breakdown of the powder. There were several other countries in the Com Bloc that this happened to so it is advised not to shoot it in the Mauser unless you know the manufacturer and years made. The Bulgarian ammo is also known as "Pink Ammo" because the separating paper in the box is pink distinguishing from other manufacturers and no matter year made should be avoided at all costs in your Mauser.
The original specs on the 7.63 Mauser is Bullet weight 86 Gr FMJ with factory load, Muzzle Velocity 1,410 fps, Muzzle Energy 375 FP's. The 7.62 Tokarev specs are Bullet weight 87 Gr FMJ with factory load, Muzzle Velocity 1,390 fps, Muzzle Energy 365 FP's. There is a whole book out now about this myth.
My source is "Cartridges of The World" Page 222, 30 (7.63x25mm) mauser and page 221, 7.62x25mm Russian Tokarev.
@@bad74maverick1 so what I am reading is that I can shoot 7.62 tokorev in my c96 if I know where and when the ammo was manufactured. My c96 was made in 1910 with 6 groves of rifling instead of 4.
@@hunters36forgingwoodworkin73 Yes that is correct. You have to be SURE of your ammo. I still err on the side of caution and generally don't shoot it in mine because I have so much of it. If I have good production ammo like Chech ammo I will use it. What I am saying is that myth has been busted. There was a run of Yugo ammo that is a bit warmer. I would shoot NO, ABSOLUTELY NO Bulgarian ammo in mine. Pink wrapper or not!!!!!!! Another problem the C96 has isn't necessarily the ammo, its the wear on the pistols themselves. If it has excessive wear then any ammo can "Batter" the gun until failure, that's why I swapped all my springs for new made ones. I still suggest Sellier and Bellot ammo designated for the 7.63 Mauser. But yes, if confident and after research and education if you have com bloc ammo with a good reputation, it will shoot just fine. Just do your research. That ammo was designed to be shot out of a 4.7" barrel so the longer barrel of the C96 which is 5.5" is going to be negligible where pressure is concerned. the 6 groove rifling should actually help with accuracy with some of the com bloc stuff with bullet stabilization.
You MUST be sure of your ammo!!! I am posting this merely to dispel the myth of the 7.62 being different than the 7.63. Originally they were designed the same. There were certain blocs of mis-manufactured ammo which caused this debate to start.
@@bad74maverick1 thank you. I have been shooting some non decescriped 7.62 made In god knows where
@@bad74maverick1 Also where did you get the new springs
Siinä kohtaa insinöörityö on pettänyt ja pahasti, syyteoikeus lienee kuitenkin jo vanhentunut. Vaikka sattuu sitä paremmissakin piireissä, 9mm panoksen voi ladata .40 kaliberin puoliautomaattiin sekä lippaaseen että aseeseen ja se laukeaa, tosin siinä tilanne on luodin koon kanssa toisinpäin.
Joo, noin päin siitä ei taida olla suurta vaaraa.
@@vintagereloading8669 On sikäli että jos ja kun hylsy repeää, voi tulla ruutikaasut silmille koska hylsyn kantakaan ei tiivistä.
mottee Tuli kerran vahingossa testattua tämä, kun omistan CZ TS:n kaliiberissa 9mm ja .40S&W. 9mm hylsy pullistui, muttei revennyt. 9mm luoti falskaa niin paljon .40 piipussa, että paineet eivät juurikaan pääse nousemaan.
Mä olen kanssa kerran ampunut .40 STI Edgestä 9mm patruunan. Epäilisin, että poimin väärän patruunan edelliseltä stagelta, luullen sitä omakseni ja laitoin sen päälle lippaasen lisää oikeita patruunoita.
Kaikeksi onneksi ko. laukaus oli seuraavan stagen viimeinen, ja sekin (turha) paikko, joten pesään jääneestä hylsystä ei ollut suurempaa haittaa.
Ulosvetäjä ei siis saanut hylsyn reunasta kiinni, vaan paisunut hylsy jäi pesään. Luoti oli poistunut luonnollista reittiä, muttei tainnut osua n 10m päässä olleeseen SRA-tauluun.
Meanwhile people are telling me I can't fire 7.62 Tokarev 😝 Not that I would, but this is hilarious. I've never even heard of a bullet simply flattening out to the right dimensions after being forced through an undersized bore, conventional wisdom says your gun would blow up or at least stovepipe catastrophically.
Tok. Is just +P+ Mauser. 7,63 and Soviet’s had only Mosin 7,62 drill
what was all that stuff that flew out the first shot? looks like extra rounds but somehow it chambered another! you are lucky i'd never have thought a 9mm would squeeze through a 7.62 chambered barrel.
9mm Para is 9,01mm
7,65 Mauser is 7,86mm.
So the difference is "only" 1,15mm.
Ist gut!
iha hyvä ettei keksintö räjähtäny
Onneksi ei sattunu mitään 🤕
What made you think that things weren't as they were supposed to be?
He said it wasn’t hitting like it should, also it was ejecting weird and sounded much different than it did with the proper ammunition. I would assume the recoil would be different, too.
Pahemminkin olisi voinut käydä. Irvistelin hermostuneesti kun ensimmäinen laukeamaton panos lensi makasiinista.
Easy schnelenfeuer conversion!
We all have are moments 🤷🏿
Täysipotkuisen tehdaspaukun jälkeen olisi voinut hyvinkin olla tapaturma-asemalle asiaa.
好枪
Get a good bore scope and examine the rifling for damage.
Voi Jussi tekevälle sattuu! Onneksi ei sattunut pahempaa vahinkoa!
Now that is what I call German engineering
Как же они в патронник-то влезли??
no damage? my god. that's truly robust.
hahahahah thats wild!
Onneksi kaikki ok. Oppia elämä kaikki.
Are you Finn?
Mistä idea ampua 9mm patruunaa?
Ai. Se olikin sekaannus. Hurja juttu.
Lol
@@gordistador Ajattelin, että se olisi tosi hyvä idea.
Youre lucky you didnt eat the bolt
Made in germany
:)
Tuo on paljon vahinkoa.