Hazrat Ali (ra) aur Ameer Muawiya (ra) Ka Ikhtilaf - Part 1 - Javed Ahmed Ghamidi
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2024
- Hazrat Ali (ra) aur Ameer Muawiya (ra) Ka Ikhtilaf - Part 1 - Javed Ahmad Ghamidi
Waqia e Karbala Saniha e Karbala ka tareekhi pasmanzar,
حضرت علی ؓ اور امیر معاویہ ؓ، اختلافات کو سمجھنے کا ایک منفرد زاویہ
▶ Watch Complete Series:
• Hazrat Ali (ra) aur Am...
🔴 SUBSCRIBE 🔔: www.youtube.co...
▶ About Javed Ahmed Ghamidi:
Javed Ahmed Ghamidi is a Pakistani Muslim theologian, a Quran scholar, and an educationist. Mr. Ghamidi is a student of Maulana Amin Ahsan Islahi and Maulana Abul A’la Maududi. Mr. Ghamidi has authored several books, including the bestseller ‘Meezan’, in which he presents a comprehensive treatise on the entire content of Islam. Mr. Ghamidi is a researcher and a critical thinker who has challenged many aspects of the traditional Muslim schools of thought on the basis of evidence from Quran and sunnah.
▶ About Ghamidi Center Of Islamic Learning:
"Ghamidi Center of Islamic Learning", an initiative of Al-Mawrid US, is established with a single purpose, to educate people of all ages about moral, ethical, and humane values as taught in Islam. Our aim is to separate history and culture from Islam and teach it in its purest form as a field of knowledge and not enforce it as a creed. We base our instruction method on argument and logic and encourage healthy criticism. An institute where traditional and historical knowledge can be understood as well as challenged with reason.
▶ DONATIONS: www.ghamidi.or...
▶ CONNECT with us:
◼ WEBSITE: www.ghamidi.org
◼ FACEBOOK: / ghamidicil
◼ TH-cam: / ghamidicil
#GCIL #JavedAhmedGhamidi #FromGhamidiDesk #AlMawrid
حق علی کے ساتھ اور علی حق کے ساتھ ۔
یا اللہ جو علی سے محبت رکھے تو بھی اس سے محبت رکھ ۔
سیدنا علی نے نبی پاک کے حکم کے مطابق تحریر محمد رسول اللہ نہیں مٹایا حق کس کے ساتھ؟
سیدہ فاطمہ اور علی المرتضی کا اختلاف ہوا کہ علی نے شادی کا اردہ کیا حق کس کے ساتھ؟
علی و عباس کا اختلاف ہوا حق کس کے ساتھ؟
حسن و علی اختلاف میں حق کس کے ساتھ؟
Hazart Ali he 4 sal hokomat Chali hu. kysy hukomat kaim nhe hue?
bachon wali batain
Beshak
Ameen
Proof?
Nabi Pak (saww) ne farmaya!
"Ali Haq ke sath aur Haq Ali ke sath hy!"
Ab Haq ke samne jo bhi aye wo Batil hy.
احادیث کی رو سے تو واضح بات یہ ہے کی حضرت علی رضی اللہ عنہ حق پر تھے۔
Hume yah baat pata hai par 1400 phlae Muslamno ko yah baat nahi pata thi.
Hamari lslam ki samag too Sahabh sae bhi bhar gi.
JazakAllah
Faisla qayamat me Allah karein ge
Sary Pakistani have no mind 😂😂😂😂😂
Usman RA ko Shahid kia GIA Kyu? qatil kon wo ik khalifa the
روزِ قیامت سب فیصلہ ھو جاۓ گا,معاویہؓ اور علی کرم اللہ وجہہ الکریم دونوں ھمارے سر کے تاج
Haq hamesha Ali (a.s) k sath hai.
I am a sunni muslim. I understand from what i have read (mostly english and western authors), that Imam Ali (A.S), was never a man of this world. He lived simply, and only kept the bare minimum essentials on his person. He was never charmed by the world, and never felt any real attraction for what was within it. For the time that he was elected amir ul momieen, he focused himself towards following the true teachings of Prophet Muhammed (Upon whom be peace), in strictness and purity. Some people weren’t happy with his interpretation of things, including the khawarijites who accused him of not being as strict as they wanted him to be. He had to deal with a kahwarijite revolt, since they were attacking other muslims. The other wars that he had to fight, he was unhappy with. After the battles of jamal and siffeen, he wept over the shuhdaa from both sides, and led the funeral prayers for the martyred on both sides.
A man, whose kingdom is not of this world, is indeed hard to understand.
Truly written brother. God bless you....!!
We are not sunni we are muslim of our caliph abu bakr umar usman Ali muwaviya hasan (ra)
you're right
सही
I am also Sunni
But hazrat ali r a par hum quraban jaye wo hamare imaan ka hissa hai
ALI IS WITH HAQ AND HAQ IS WITH ALI. RADIYALLAHO ANHO. I AM AN INDIAN SUNNI MUSLIM.
Ghamidi sab ke lye dono mauqif thik hai logical hain inki raye asi he hoti jiski wjh se tum inko sunte ho
Beshak!
Mashallah May Allaha blesing you bro forum Pakistan
@@hasnainabbas51 me
Haq hamesha Ali ke sath hai..
قالَ رسول اللہ صل اللہ علیہ و آلہ و سلم ؛ منکنتم مولا فھذا علی مولا....جس جس کا میں مولا ہوں علی علیہ سلام اُس کے مولا ہیں
غامدی صاحب کے لیکچر شوق سے سنتا ہوں پہلی دفعہ لگا ہے کہ غامدی صاحب کی باتوں میں دم نہیں ہے
سرکار دوعالم صلی اللّٰہ علیہ وآلہ وسلم کا فرمان ہے کہ جس کا میں مولا ہوں اسکا علی مولا ہے اور فرمان عالیشان ہے کہ علی حق کے ساتھ ہے اور حق علی کے ساتھ ہے
Jeo
Wo sirf ikhtalaf tha Hazrat Muawiya b Sahabi e Rasool thay
Beshak hq sach
بھائ مولا کا کیا مطلب ہے
Mashallah
مولا علی علیہ سلام حق ہیں اور حق مولا علی علیہ سلام کے ساتھ ھے ❤
I AM CHRISTIAN BUT Hazart Ali on right side and there follower
یزید سے بھی مراسم، حسین کو بھی سلام۔۔۔ غامدی ہے میرا نام،
Ali Haq hai Ali haq h❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
,Haq, was and is..... always with Hazrat Ali RA
See Face of program evil agenda against Sahaba inshallah.
Dear sahaba ka maqam koye nhi chuh sakta but Jo ustime hua wo bayaan karna kounsi Galt baat hai
Hazrat Ali alehi salam
Ahadees Mai likha hai alahi salam
Baad k molvi kha Gaye hain
@@rizwanhabib3491 kisne bola aisa wahi aayi thi ya time travel kar ke muhadaseen se mil kar aaye ho tum ya kisi ke aandhe muqalid jisne bol diya ki maulvi kha gaye aur tumne man liya
@@danish_mohammedjab darood me AS parhty Hain sab to naam k sath AS q nahi?
Is se Bari bhi koi daleel Chahiye mery Bhai ko?
I pray i be resurrected with Ahlul Bait at the day of judgement. Aameen
اعتدال کا ہرگز یہ مطلب نہیں ہوتا کہ سب مساوی ہوں بلکہ معتدل نقطہ نظر حق بات کو قرآن و حدیث کی روشنی میں دیکھنا ہوتا ہے
yahan motadil ka matlab hy k dono ko sahe kaha jaey aur sb khush rahen
ashra mubashra k hoty, aur umr (ra) jnka boht kehty hein jo keh gaey k mei apny bad en 6 k ilawa kisi ko ehl nahe pata
abu bakr (ra) tu munkreen e zakat k khilaf bhe alam buland karen aur jaiz rahen aur ali (as) baghyo ko maren aur MOTADiL view ki bat ki jaey
yani just WAH
Seedha seedha sahih hadees ki mukhalifat men tareekh ki zaeef riwayaat ka sahara lekar bani ummayah ko protect kar raha hai, unke jaraim par parda daal raha hai. Yeh shaks jab bhi ahlebait ki baat aati hai hadees ko chor kar Taarikh ki baat karta hai. Mene aik video men suna tha k yeh imam Mahdi (as) ka bhi munkir hai jis ke baarey takreeban Abu Daood men 12 sahih ahadees mojood hen. How he just manage to throw all the ahadees in the bin so easily and leave people in wah wah. Just wow!
@@mjasyed So Allah SWT made a mistake and forgot to mention about Imam Mehdi in Quran. Also kindly give one authentic hadeeth where Huzoor Paak SAW named Imam Mehdi and said he will come back. For god sake stop following kesay khani or stories and make them religion.
بہت خوب۔
@@mjasyed mje ye baten ap k yahan kn c tareekh biyan ki gai or ap kis sahih hadees ki bat kar ry hn ap paish kren phr karty hn debate
I love Imam Ali ❤️
Ali ka muqaam bohot hi zyada ooncha hai
اور قرآن میں ہے مسلمانوں کا مولا اللہ ہے
سبحان اللہ
Prophet Muhammad (saww) says;
"Haq Ali k sath ha aur Ali haq k sath"
This hadees (alongside many other ahadees) is sufficient to declare all those as culprits/wrongdoers/sinners who ever stood against Ali.
However, yes, our favouritism can declare anyone innocent even if he is Pharaoh or Namrood or Yazeed
Being sahaba, hamaray liay dono hastiyan mohtaram hain. Laiken aik baat tu 100% true hay. Dono haq pay nahi thay, dono baatil nahi thay. Aik hi haq pay thay , aur Hazrat Ali (r.a) (baab-ul-ilm, shair-e-khuda, Ahl-e-bait, fateh-e-Khaibar, Haroon a.s aur moosa a.s ki tashbeeh kay musdaaq, Muhammad (pbuh) kay sab say qareeb) ki opinion kay saamnay , koi doosra haq pay kaisay ho sakta hay.
Baaqi, Allah hi anjaam janta hay, hamari opinion say kisi ka rutba kam nahi hona. Laiken haqeeqat ko jhutlaya nahi ja sakta.
Wah
It wasn’t the sword only that lead to Janab e Muawai’s government. Hazrat Ali (AS) won the battle of Safeen until the opposite side played deception and politics. They could not defeat Sher e Khuda in the battle ground. Sachi aur seedi baat kerni chahiye.
he said Muawiya won during the face off, when Imam Hasan out of not wanting war and his love for Ummah decided to step aside as Khalifa. He never said Muawiya won from Sayyiduna Ali.
Hassan withdrew in best interest of Muslims. Is Only this sentence not enough that who was thinking about Muslims welfare and who for personal gains.
Haha ap sawal chana ka jawaaab gandum de rhy o
So if hazrat Ali ( rA) could be decieved then atleast we should not called mushkil kasha .
so u dont know the reason behind that war after watching this vedio aswell
کون حق پر تھا اور کون نہیں ، اس کا عام مسلمان سے مرنے کے بعد کوئی سوال نہیں ہوگا اور اور نا اس معلومات سے کسی کو کوئی فائدہ حاصل ہیں ہوگا، ہر شخص مرنے کے بعد اپنے اعمال کا خود ذمہ دار ہوگا، نا باپ سے اس کے بارے میں سوال ہوگا اور نا بیٹے سے اس کے باپ کے بارے میں ، 1400 سال کے بعد ہم میں کسی کو یہ حق نہیں کے ہم کسی کے بارے میں رائے زنی یا فیصلے صادر کرتے پھریں ، یہ وہ ہستیاں ہیں جن سے حبیب خدا صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم سے براہ راست ان سے تعلقات اور یہ دونوں حضراتِ صحابہ کرام رضوان اللہ علیہم اجمعین جید صحابی رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم تھے، ہمیں اپنے اعمال و افعال کی فکر کرنی ہے کے جو دین کے قوانین اور ضابطے ہم پر لازم ہیں کیا ہم وہ پورا کررہے ہیں ؟؟؟ بس یہ فکر ہی ہم کو ان غیر ضروری سوالات اور تنقیدی جائزوں سے دور رکھ سکتی ہے
True word's ❤
اللہ تعالی آپکو امیر شام کی جنت نصیب کرے
Ameen
Jab muaviya ko Hukumat mil gayi tab inhone Hazrat Usman ra ke Qatilon ki Saja Ke Liye zid kyun bhula di. Yani Maula Ali shuru se akhir tak sahi they. Aur muaviya ko sirf Maula Ali ki mukhalfat, khud ki hukumat ke liye karni thi aur bahana Hz Usman ra ke qisas ko banaya.
Haan bhai yahi to khn rhn ghamidhi sahab....Ali Sa ko logon ne chuna or yahi sahi tha
...
Hazret Hussain ko katel karney ki Swedish kid nay ki .
سیدنا علی چوتھے خلیفہ راشد تھے اور اسکا انکار کوئی بھی نہیں کر سکتا ہے۔
جہاں تک بات قاتلین عثمان کی ہے تو ان سے اکثر جنگوں میں ہی مارے گئے اور ان میں سے ایک یعنی محمد بن ابی بکر کو بھی مصر جاتے ہوئے قتل کر دیا گیا۔
لہذا تقریبا وہ سب لوگ مارے جا چکے تھے جنہوں نے سیدنا عثمان کو قتل کیا۔
اے مسلمانوں
آپ کے نبی کریم صلی اللّٰہ علیہ والہ وسلم نے فرمایا
جس جس کا میں مولا اس اس کا علی مولا
I am sorry can't agree completely, let's say as you said sword decide the faith of government then Hazrat Ali RA rulled almost 2 years, he could have killed many more people just to established his government but he didn't rather Hazrat Muawiyha RA still opposed him even after his Shahadat. 🤔
Yes karbala is one of the consequences
Who cares if you don't agree. Listen to him again you'll find your answer
Jab musalman kaum ke sar mein khota lag jaye tou unki assiciate krne ku quaat kho jaati hai aur in ke brain free ghoomna shuru kr dete hein.
Ya phir aisi suspenseful cheezein ejaad kr ke woh apne dil ko sukoon dete hein.
صرف اور صرف علی علیہ السلام حق ہیں
Ap k is 22 episode ko m pehlay 5 minutes m hi smj gya, shukeria ghamidi sahb, allah ap ko is ka ajr day
An excellent scholar with an excellent analysis. May Allah bless you and your family and your team Javed Ahmad Ghamidi Sahab
There's no mistake in ijetehad , who ever came in opposition of Hazrat Ali Karm Allah Wajho was mistaken and batil in opposition to Haq , Haq hamesha Ali R.A ke Saath , May Allah's curse be upon the enemies of Ameer ul Momineen , who ever they were
Sir you were an intellectual in my opinion, but after watching this video I totally changed my point of view. You are an islamic scholar not any critic. You are sitting on a chair where you jast have to explain islamic point of view about the situation and condition. Being a muslim,it is your duty to elaborate the incidents honestly, Hazrat Ali was appointed as a khalif of the Muslims, he was elected by those people who selected Former 3 khalifa. Once Hazrat Ali was elected it had become obligatory for Hazrat Mauviya to obey him. And secondly many predictions were present about Hazrat Ali that .He would always be right against all the Muslims.
Gamdi Sir you are giving your opinion like a non-Muslim critic who examine the circumstances and then explain the solution. Whatever the circumstances were. Hazrat Ali was right.
YOU ARE QUITE WRONG,HE HAS TO TELL THE FACTS AND NOT HIDE THE FACTS,SAY THE UNSAID,TELL THE UNTOLD AND,Was Ali elected or selected by some 200 or 400 as blamed by Javed Ahmed Ghamadi and Ameer Muawiya had millions of people who wanted to have him the caliph but according to which rules of business.He did not reply the answer but defended his like minded like a funded project and did not tell the nation why he selected the most corrupt boy on buying and forced initiatives and the same did with the Hussain and his family. How long our religious leaders and the scholars would lie and hide the facts and who are the ultimate beneficiaries of such projects?
Al-Quran
Surah 2 - Al-Baqara - Ayah 134
أَعـوذُ بِاللهِ مِنَ الشَّيْـطانِ الرَّجيـم
بِسْمِ اللّٰهِ الرَّحْمٰنِ الرَّحِيْمِ
تِلۡكَ اُمَّةٌ قَدۡ خَلَتۡۚ لَهَا مَا كَسَبَتۡ وَلَـكُمۡ مَّا كَسَبۡتُمۡۚ وَلَا تُسۡئَـلُوۡنَ عَمَّا كَانُوۡا يَعۡمَلُوۡنَ ۞
Translation:
They were a people who passed away; they shall receive the reward of what they earned and you shall have the reward of what you will earn; and you will not be questioned as to what they did.
He is not here to convince you but to state how it was.
Bro.
Those time were tough .
Both parties point of view was right.
One wanted speedy justice other wanted to delay for stability reasons.
Syeeduna Muavia was ready to took oath of allegiance of Syeeduna Ali but after taking revange of blood of Syeeduna Ustman
But brother, Ghamdi is denying khilafat of Maula Ali a.s saying that Ali a.s khilafat was not prevailed and penetrated in the area but by his virtues he is khalifa just like first one and 2nd one. I have said in my comments that ghamdi is a scholar just like those ones who were living with Yazid lanti.
Mohsin beg sb zabardast Allah pak slamat rakhay Apko or javed chohdri sb ko
Able sunat wal jama.....hazrat Ali r.a haq p hain ❤❤
حق علی علیہ السلام کے ساتھ اور علی علیہ السلام حق کے ساتھ ۔
Ji bilkul 25 Saal tk ❤❤❤❤
Prophet Mohammad saww said : Lahmo hum lahmi wa damo hum dami....Ali's flesh is my flesh, Ali's blood is my blood, Ana hurbun liman harabahum wa silmun liman sa'alahum....I'm at peace with those who are at peace with Ali a.s and I'm at war with those who are at war with Ali'
Muawiya was a staunch enemy of Ahlulbait a.s he was not just enemy of Imam Ali a.s but also Imam Hasan a.s & Imam Husain a.s.
I ask muslims who killed Hazrat Ammar Yasir r.a....???
Muawiya!
Prophet saww said Ammar the rebels would kill you and the leader of these rebels would be inviting muslims to the hell!
yahan baat kiya ho rae or tum kiya keh rahay ya sari jo apnay bayan ke kiya HAZRAT HASSAN AS ko nai pata tha 1400 saal pechay jakar socho 21 saadi nai the
Sdo I think 🤔 😕 😅 😌
Right
@@videogamerzworld6468 hazrat hassan ny sula hi ki thi ba sir....sula allah k nabi ny kafiro k sath b ki hui ha us pr kia kahygy aaap???
@@masoodshuja5479 sula nhi baait kar li thi
I am surprised that how these so called scholars defend bani umaya. While there are countless ahadess in the favor of Hazrat Ali(AS).
Sach kia hay arabic history
yeah and sahaba dont remember those hadith ?
Tmare dilo se mirza nikly ga to kitab ki baat smaj ay gi na
بَغیر عِشقِ علیؑ زِنْدَگیِ فَنا ھَستَم🥰
Waao sir g behtreen andaaz me samjaya hai Allah apko salamat rakhy
♥️اَللّٰھُمَّ صَلِّ عَلٰی مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلٰی آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ کَماصَلَّيتَ عَلٰی اِبْراھِيمَ وَعَلٰی آلِ اِبْراھِيمَ اِنَّكَ حَمِيدُ مَّجِيدُُ
♥️اَللَّھُمَّ بَارِك عَلٰی مُحَمَّدٍوَّعَلٰی آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ کَمَا بَارکتَ عَلٰی اِبراھِيمَ وَعَلٰی آلِ اِبراھيمَ اِنَّك حَمِيدُ مَّجِيد\
Allah give Muslim Ummah leadership like Hazrat Umer Bin Abdul Aziz RA
Ameen
Ahlebet ke dushmano par Allah ki lanat
اللہ آپ کی بصیرت سے اُمت کو فائدہ پہنچائے، اور آپ کی خطاؤں سے اُمت کو محفوظ رکھے،
As usual ghamidi saab forsake and put aside all the clear sahih ahadees about the issue. I don't understand his problem. Why he gives his understanding of issues priority over the verdict we can derive from the word of the prophet (s).
I mean he's trying to defend ameer e shaam making excuse of distance. It was made very clear to him by Ali (ra) before any war occurred between them! There was a constant exchange of letters between Ali and Muawiyah.
And shame on you for saying Ali was chosen by the rebels. Madina had only rebels in it??? Madina had thousands of sahaba who fought in badr, uhad, Ahzab, khyber and hunain. Didn't they pledged their allegiance to Ali (ra)?? Along with them Makkah didn't have problem with it, Kufa, basra, Egypt and all along the islamic states pledged. In war of siffeen have you ever seen the people with Ali (ra)? Who were they?? Were they sahaba or were they rebels?? Why Muawiyah couldn't see thousands of sahaba with Ali?? Why he went against the jaamat of Muhajireen wal Ansaar?
*The only reason was the old hatred of Bani Hashim!
*He couldn't stand the fact that the man who killed their kafir forefathers in badr and Uhad to become khalifa.
*He didn't wanted Ali in power who he had to answer for all the plundering of bait ul maal they've been doing for years under Hazrat Usman's nose.
Who is ghamidi to tell me I can't call Muawiyah a baghi when my prophet called him baghi in the hadees of Martyrdom of Ammar bin Yasir???
I have a question: ok for instance Muawiyah was not clear as he claims. Didn't the hadees about Ammar made clear to him that he was wrong. Why didn't he stopped fighting and give his bayyah when everything became crystal clear. Instead he chose to fool his army by saying Ali brought Ammar in war so Ali is responsible for his martyrdom! What?! If prophet brought Hamza in Uhad so will you hold account prophet for killing of Hamza?
What a twisting of truth?
Muawiyah made it clear in the hadees of Abdullah ibn Umar (ra) that he had nothing to do with shahadat e Usman but he wanted power because he thought he deserved it. Allah knows on what grounds!
So ghamidi saab stop making your own theories. Everything is very clear in books of ahadees. It's your old habit to jump to your conclusions without considering the account of clear ahadees on any issue. This makes you a 'Munkar e Hadees' blatantly.
bahut achi dua hai
Zaberdst jawab
صدق رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وآلہ وسلم
Bhala Ho Aap Ka,Allah Pak Sehat o Tan Darusti Ata Farma ay,Aap K Rasa Fikr o Shu oor Ki Zaroorat Hai Hamain,Tamam Tareefain Allah Pak K Liyay Hein Jo Qoumon Ko Urooj o Zawal Say Ham Kinar Farmata Hai
سب بڑا گناہ یہ ہے کہ مولا علی ابن ابی طالب علیہ السلام کا نام اس شخص کیساتھ لیا جائے۔۔۔۔۔
غامدی کے عقائد امت مسلمہ سے مختلف ہیں، اللہ تعالیٰ اس کے شر سے محفوظ فرمائیں
آمین یا رب العالمین
Hazrat Ali (R.T.A)or hazrat Ameer mouavia R.T.A.zindabad
Ali haq par haq Ali ke sath
ماشا اللہ بہت عمدہ انداز ھے آپکا
رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وآلہ وسلم نے فرمایا ، حق علی ع کے ساتھ ، ،، جہاں علی ع وہاں حق
کسی بھی لڑائی میں ایک گروپ حق پر ہوتا ہے اور دوسرا ناحق
بات ختم
Saahaabaa kee list bataaeñ jinho ne sayadana ali r.a. par be,at kee+sayadana maawiyaa ke haath par be,at karne waale saahaabaa kiraam kee bhee list bataen,kioñ ke hizbullah kee central commettee ko hee khalifaa banaane kaa akhtiar thaa naa ke baghioñ ko?!!!
Achi Taaweel Aur achy andaz se ikhtelaf ko wazeh kia.
بغضِ علی میں کان ایسے پکڑیں یا ویسے کوئی فرق نہیں پڑتا!!!!
Agr hm jazbat ko ak trf rakh kr inki bat pr gor krain to... To ye sara waqya smjh ny main boht asani ho gi... JazakAllah
jazbat ko side per rakhen
munkreen e zakat tu muslim thy phr kesy unky khialf abu bakar (ra) ny jang ki ? agar uss amal ko ye kaha jaey k vo maal k gharz sy the tu ??
حدیث رسول ص ہے کہ علی ع ہمیشہ قرآن کے ساتھ رہیں گے اور قرآن علی ع کی ساتھ رہے گا یہاں تک روز قیامت مجھے حوض کوثر پہ آکر ملیں
Shia ki jhooti hadith
🖐️🖐️
HAQ ALI KARAM ALLAHO WAJHO K SAATH HAY ❤❤❤❤
مولا علی ع حق پر ھیں قابضوں نے قبضہ کیا
لفظ مطغلط کا جواب نھیں نہایت بافھم اور تجربہ کار شخصیت ھم کو میسر ھے الحمدللہ
Jo log muawia or yazeed ko haq pr samajhtay allha un ka hashr bhi un hi k sath kraga.
عشقِ علی(ع) میں روشن ہوسکتی ہیں آنکھیں کافر کی-
اور بغضِ علی(ع) میں حافظِ قرآں اندھا بھی ہوسکتا ہے-
deene islam poetry se samjh nahi aata , facts neutral ho kar research karni parti ha emotions k saat nahi
Jahil log quran se hat kr poetry wgera se logic dhondty hain
Speak Truth r the Truth will Speak.Diference between H.Ali and Muaawia.?
بے بنیاد کہانی سنا رہا ہے یہ جیدا غامدی
Beshak ❤️
We always stand with hazrat ali a.s r.a they are on truth Haq but we never disrespect any shabi with hazrat maviya r.a
❤️❤️
Jazakallah Dr. Javed sahab. Bahot kuch seekhne ko milta hai.
دعوت ذوالعشرہ مین اور غدیر مین حضور نے کیا کھا تھا
علی میرے بعد میرا جانشین ھے اور میرا خلیفہ ھے
رحلۃ حضور کے ٹائیم نبی نے کھا تھا مجھ کاغذ اور قلم لا دو تاکہ میرے بعد امت اختلاف مین نا جائے
باقی بات بعد مین ھے
MashaAllah very informative
As usual ghamidi saab forsake and put aside all the clear sahih ahadees about the issue. I don't understand his problem. Why he gives his understanding of issues priority over the verdict we can derive from the word of the prophet (s).
I mean he's trying to defend ameer e shaam making excuse of distance. It was made very clear to him by Ali (ra) before any war occurred between them! There was a constant exchange of letters between Ali and Muawiyah.
And shame on you for saying Ali was chosen by the rebels. Madina had only rebels in it??? Madina had thousands of sahaba who fought in badr, uhad, Ahzab, khyber and hunain. Didn't they pledged their allegiance to Ali (ra)?? Along with them Makkah didn't have problem with it, Kufa, basra, Egypt and all along the islamic states pledged. In war of siffeen have you ever seen the people with Ali (ra)? Who were they?? Were they sahaba or were they rebels?? Why Muawiyah couldn't see thousands of sahaba with Ali?? Why he went against the jaamat of Muhajireen wal Ansaar?
*The only reason was the old hatred of Bani Hashim!
*He couldn't stand the fact that the man who killed their kafir forefathers in badr and Uhad to become khalifa.
*He didn't wanted Ali in power who he had to answer for all the plundering of bait ul maal they've been doing for years under Hazrat Usman's nose.
Who is ghamidi to tell me I can't call Muawiyah a baghi when my prophet called him baghi in the hadees of Martyrdom of Ammar bin Yasir???
I have a question: ok for instance Muawiyah was not clear as he claims. Didn't the hadees about Ammar made clear to him that he was wrong. Why didn't he stopped fighting and give his bayyah when everything became crystal clear. Instead he chose to fool his army by saying Ali brought Ammar in war so Ali is responsible for his martyrdom! What?! If prophet brought Hamza in Uhad so will you hold account prophet for killing of Hamza?
What a twisting of truth?
Muawiyah made it clear in the hadees of Abdullah ibn Umar (ra) that he had nothing to do with shahadat e Usman but he wanted power because he thought he deserved it. Allah knows on what grounds!
So ghamidi saab stop making your own theories. Everything is very clear in books of ahadees. It's your old habit to jump to your conclusions without considering the account of clear ahadees on any issue. This makes you a 'Munkar e Hadees' blatantly.
Distinguished historian Taha Hussain has rightly pointed out that political history of that era should be viewed from an objective p.o.v rather than emotions, only then we shall understand that it were the conditions that made some decisions inevitable
It was all a power struggle between tribes ... like it happens today as well in tribal areas .... kon samjhaye in logon ko ... they don't think and use their minds ... just believe what baba sitting on the mimbar is blabbering....just do research from non-religious sources and you will find the truth.
Emotions k bghr to janwar b nae HOTA .. Khuda gharat kry so-called truth phailany walon ko ..
@@rajaaliahmadhussain6591 Kya baat hai Ali Ahmad bhai !!!
لوگوں کے لئے یہ اہم تھا کہ علی کیسے حُکمران تھے۔
سیدنا عمر کی شہادت، سیدنا عثمان کی شہادت، سیدنا علی کی خلافت، جمل، صفین، نہروان، سیدنا حسن کی صلح اور سیدنا معاویہ کا دور حکومت، کربلا اور یزید کی نامزدگی و حکومت سے متعلق آج سے پہلے میرے جتنے بھی کٹر عقائد تھے، ختم ہو گئے۔ میرا قلب مطمئین ہو گیا۔
اللہ تعالٰی غامدی صاحب کو عمر دراز عطا فرمائے، آمین۔
bht achi tarah biyan kia ak muslman ki trah sb ko jorne k liye na k fasad machnae k liye , isliye ghamdi shb is waqt best muslim scholar hen pakistan k
Bohy khobsort Andaaz m biyan frmaya Mudlll ghuftghoo thee Subhan Allah Ali RZ r Muavia Hamry Sroo k Taaj hn Ali b hmary Miavia b hmary
Not that simple. What is the reason of Revolt against Hazrat Usman RA ?
Why did not Muaviya bin Abusufiqn in his 20 years of rule, captured murderers of Hazrat Usman RA ?
and he intentionally skipped Hadith about Ammar to save Muavia
O bhai jinhn ny katal kia tha ap ksi rawayat sy sabit kar do k wo kn kn log thy or ameer muavia k door mn wo zinda thy or unhn ny bdla ni lia unhn ny to sb sy ziada dunia mn islam ka ghalba kia jihad k zariye to usman k katilo ko kahan chorna tha unhn
Most of them was already killed in previous 3 wars and after sullah of hassan(ra) there was no need for capturing murderers
بھائی جان حضرت امیر معاویہ رض نے خلافت سنبھالنے کے بعد قاتلین عثمان کو چن چن کر قتل کیا۔ بعض کو تو حضرت علی رض کی خلافت کے دوران ہی مارا گیا ۔ کسی تاریخی کتاب کا مطالعہ کرنے کے بعد ہی کمنٹ کیا کریں
@@Richlifestyle1098 agar pehle 3 jango main zadatar quatilin e usman(as) mare jachuke the aur sulah Hasan k bad unhe capture karne ki zarurat nahi thi, to fir muawiya(ra) ne hazrat Hasan(as) ki bait kiu nahi kiya? Muawiya to usman(as) ki quatal ka kisas chahate the our agar quatilin mar chuka tha to hazrat Hasan(as) ke khilaf kyu Gaye? Iske piche maqsad kay tha? Thora aqal ka use v krlo.
Ghamidi qayamat me apka hasher hazrat umer o usman k sath ho, ameen summa ameen.
Can you please tell us about ammar ibn i yasir's hadees?
And many other ahadees
It's explicitly said in hadith of bukhari and Muslim that Ammar will be martyred by transgressing group. Ghamdi intentionally skipped this Hadith to save Muavia. This isn't first time that so called scholars hide historical facts
jo uss daur ko behtreen keh gaey un sy ap kuch aur tawqu na rakhen
Bukhari 4108, Muslim 4776 behtreen daur k bary hy - lakin esko be zaeef kahen gy ye mohtram
Kia ap ye bata skty ammar ibin yasirra ko jb shaheed kia gya to mugheera bin suba b mojod thy wo baityrizwan waly sahabi hn jin ki shan mn allah ka quran utra to mugheera bin shuba ko jahanumi kho nauzubiilah or quran ki ayat k munkir hojao
Very good question… I would suggest you to do your own research because if you ask sunnies they will put it on Saba’iyyah rebels who also killed hazrat Usman ra and the other side will claim group that had support of hazrat ayesha ra to be responsible for his murder…
اتنی لمبی بات کی یہ مولا علی علیہ السلام کی شخصیت سے نا واقفی اور بغض کی وجہ ھے اور یہ قیامت تک اس طرح ھوتا رھے گا
آپ نےبہت خوبصورت انداز میں اس صورت_ حال کو بیان کیا ھے۔
آپ کے مطابق تلوار کے زور پر اگر کوئی حکومت جائز یا ناجائز قائم ہو گئی تو اسے مان لینا چاہیے۔ جبکہ قرآن کی صریح آیت کے مطابق حکومت صرف اور صرف باہمی مشورہ سے قائم ہو گی تو کیا قرآن کی صریح آیت کی موجودگی میں اجتہاد ہو سکتا ہے؟
Most wonderful reasoning,
مشورہ ہوا مشورے میں اختلاف ہوا
پھر ایک گروہ بر سر اقتدار آئےتو اسکی حکومت جائز ہو گئ
Bilkul bhi jaaiz nahi
We have every right to judge as we are searching the truth.
Yes
You cannot judge history.. we can only learn from History..
You should first become better than people you are judging.
One the best discussion i hv ever heard about this senstive topic... JazakAllah Ghamdi sahib.
Ghamidi saab maybe not among the terrorist kind of ulema but certainly he is one of those who give priority to their own thoughts and opinion over the hukum and words of holy Prophet of Allah. Clearly he's a rejector of hadees. I have seen him many many times, he forms his opinion looking at history traditions which are weak ignoring sahih hadees regarding that topic specifically topics which involve the family of the prophet of Allah specially about Ali, Fatima, Hasan and Hussain or anyone from their lineage.
As usual ghamidi saab forsake and put aside all the clear sahih ahadees about the issue. I don't understand his problem. Why he gives his understanding of issues priority over the verdict we can derive from the word of the prophet (s).
I mean he's trying to defend ameer e shaam making excuse of distance. It was made very clear to him by Ali (ra) before any war occurred between them! There was a constant exchange of letters between Ali and Muawiyah.
And shame on you for saying Ali was chosen by the rebels. Madina had only rebels in it??? Madina had thousands of sahaba who fought in badr, uhad, Ahzab, khyber and hunain. Didn't they pledged their allegiance to Ali (ra)?? Along with them Makkah didn't have problem with it, Kufa, basra, Egypt and all along the islamic states pledged. In war of siffeen have you ever seen the people with Ali (ra)? Who were they?? Were they sahaba or were they rebels?? Why Muawiyah couldn't see thousands of sahaba with Ali?? Why he went against the jaamat of Muhajireen wal Ansaar?
*The only reason was the old hatred of Bani Hashim!
*He couldn't stand the fact that the man who killed their kafir forefathers in badr and Uhad to become khalifa.
*He didn't wanted Ali in power who he had to answer for all the plundering of bait ul maal they've been doing for years under Hazrat Usman's nose.
Who is ghamidi to tell me I can't call Muawiyah a baghi when my prophet called him baghi in the hadees of Martyrdom of Ammar bin Yasir???
I have a question: ok for instance Muawiyah was not clear as he claims. Didn't the hadees about Ammar made clear to him that he was wrong. Why didn't he stopped fighting and give his bayyah when everything became crystal clear. Instead he chose to fool his army by saying Ali brought Ammar in war so Ali is responsible for his martyrdom! What?! If prophet brought Hamza in Uhad so will you hold account prophet for killing of Hamza?
What a twisting of truth?
Muawiyah made it clear in the hadees of Abdullah ibn Umar (ra) that he had nothing to do with shahadat e Usman but he wanted power because he thought he deserved it. Allah knows on what grounds!
So ghamidi saab stop making your own theories. Everything is very clear in books of ahadees. It's your old habit to jump to your conclusions without considering the account of clear ahadees on any issue. This makes you a 'Munkar e Hadees' blatantly.
JazakAllah
Har aik zaawiya se Imaam Ali A.S Haq per hain,,,
شکریہ بھائی آپ کا سوال کرنے کا انداز بہت کمال بہت خوب ہے جواب تو لا جواب ہے ہی کوئی شک نہیں
Contradiction in his own points
First Quran ayats quoted are not in the context of representation
People in Madina representation for all Muslim ?
Further all 4 kaliphs were elected in different ways
Many other points
So we need to read ourselves and will understand
Bukhari ki hadees amar ko aik baghi jamat katal kare gi ya sawal zroor pochna ghamdi sshib sa
Sahi Bukhari 2812
Wait for next episode
Ghamdi haramzada hai
no hadees is bigger than Quran
Imam Hassan do Musalmaan groho k darmiyaan sulaah kaim kary gy (mafhoom of Hadith)
Ali aleh Salam is haque and haque is Ali aleh salam
Mene bahut si video dekhi lekin jitna mutmain me aapki video se howa aur kisi se nahi❤
Moula Ali R.A Haq hain.
As per the Words of Prophet According to the words of Prophet Muhammad (SAWW) "ALI (AS) HUQ KE SATH, HUQ ALI (AS) KE SATH", a person having any dispute with Maula Ali (AS) would be at fault.
💯 percent true
Yes, but fault on basis of unjust reasons.
Wanting the revange of Syeeduna Ustman was their just right
Proof?
@@whiteholeeducationcenter why muawia didnt take revenge in his rule? 🤨😂
@@meeretalk Because he already took it during Ali's rule. Muawiyah killed Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr, Malik Al Ashtat and Abdur rahman ibn uwais who were perpetrators in killing of usman.
Those who defend Al-Abu sufiyaan against Ahlubait a.s or stay neutral to both saying both correct... is on the wrong side of history!
That's it.
Thank You God
Coz u r shea, out of total Muslims shea r not more than 10,15 percent, so the rest don't agree to ur argument
There is no parallels to Hazrat Ali (AS) so when you belittle Rasul Allah's blood then you know who's side are you on and shame on anyone that appreciates Moaviya by praising him
In Islam people decide who they want to choose and give there opinion. It’s a not about Blood. It’s about what Allah and his prophet (PBUH) has told us. Blood has nothing to do with Islam. As ghamdi said Muslims will know on day of judgement the truth. I hope all good Muslims no matter what there sect be granted Jannah.
@Mohsin Abbas..... belittle karna to aapka shak-o-shubah he, kaun kissika parallel hosakta he ?
Rashidoon ka parallel kahin mila he aapko ? Bughz-e-Muawiyyah mein aap extremism ka parallel
hosakte hein...! Khuda-na -Khuwastah.
Hazrat Moaviya Razi Allah Anho was a great Sahabi. Nobody can degrade him. Let shia say anything against him, they will ultimately know on the Day of Judgement.
Mohsin sb only blood line is elegibility ? .... Please recall about PBUH uncles.
Interviewer is excellent and skilled . Good questions are asked.
ہر صحابہ نبی ﷺ جنتی جنتی
What has been done by the destiny in the past, we can not change it , but we have to accept the past as it is and leave it for Allah to decide on judgement day.
U r weekest at eman if u don't have courage to say right ... Right and a wrong be wrong
Brother what u want will make muslims enemy of each other
Best opinion but some people always want to create fuss between two groups of Muslims
بہت اعلیٰ، مدلل گفتگو،
غامدی صاحب کے گفتگو سے بات تو صاف واضح ہوگئی کہ خلافت اور واقعہ کربلا کے آڑ میں چند شر پسند عناصر (یہودیوں کے مراعات یافتہ) غیر انسانی اور اسلام دشمن سرگرمیاں یعنی محرم کے با برکت مہینے میں فضول قسم کے جلسے جلوس وغیرہ کرکے یہودیوں کے خواہش کے مطابق مسلمانوں میں انتشار پھیلارھے ھیں۔
You're not concluding everything
Engineer Ali Mirza is absolutely right on this topic
Wait for next episode..... engineer moha ali mirza is a wrong rafzi nr
سب سے بہتر تعلیم قرآن میں اللہ نے دی ہے کہ۔ وہ ایک جماعت تھی جو گذر چکی، تم سے نہیں پوچھا جائے گا کہ وہ کیا کرتے تھے، تمہارے اعمال تمہارے ساتھ اور ان کے اعمال ان کے ساتھ۔ القرآن
Say Hazrat Ali (a.s)
I have read most replies etc.
My suggestion is please do further research on characters of both Imam Ali and Imam Ali's children characters (from Islamic Values) and also equally do a research on Muawia's and Muawia's children characters (again also from Islamic Values) and then come to your own conclusion. PLEASE MAKE SURE WHEN YOU EMBARK ON YOUR RESEARCH YOU NEED TO FIND UNBIASED SOURCES.
Best of luck future researchers.
Dear Ibrahim, majority of us are so hard-wired to our biases, mental-conditioning and old beliefs that it has become extremely difficult to accept new truths. Only the wise can do that not the masses. But hope slow and steady, truth will find its own ways to reveal upon all.
جناب کی بات سن کر ایسا لگتا ہے جیسے مرا نہیں زندہ ہے، بہت افسوس کی بات ہے
بہترین گفتگو۔ اپنے تعصبات کو سائیڈ پر رکھ کر سنیں تو سمجھ آئیگی اور اگر تاریخ آپ کیلئے دین ہے تو پھر شاید مایوسی ہو سن کر۔
Janab ap tasub ki ainak utar kar pehly hazrat Ali aur Ameer e sham ki zindgio ka motala Karyn phir nabi saww aur sahaba Karam ki taleemat ka motala Karyn phir osky tanazur Mai iss tanazay ko dekhyn apko sub clear Nazar aye ga.agar Allah ny haq ap ky naseeb Mai rakha hoga tu.aur yeh ghamdi sb pay par ki urra rahy hain.jin logon ka gehra motala nahi hota unko yeh bohat Pasand ata hy
کیا بات ہے بہت اچھا دفاع کیا جناب نے معاویہ اینڈ کمپنی کا
جب ایک معتبر حدیث موجود ہو جس پر سبکا اتفاق ہے کہ عمار بن یاسر کو ایک باغی گروہ قتل کرے گا۔ تو پھر باقی یہ تاویلیں اور دلیلیں کیوں ڈھونڈھی جارہی ہیں ۔ حدیث کے بعد کسی دوسری دلیل کی ضرورت باقی نہیں رہتی
Long live Imam Ali AS
Hazrat Usman ke Qatal ka qisas to aik bahana tha. Ghamidi sb, ye bhi bata dejiayay ke jab Muavia ki hakoomat qaaem ho gaee to phir unho ne Hazrat Usman ko qatal kernay waalo se koee qisaas Liya. Unn ko koee saza hoowi.