MAT 2017 | All questions | MAT Livestream Bonus

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ส.ค. 2024
  • All of the questions for MAT 2017. Do not watch all of this video, you've got better things to do! Click "show more" for links to jump to a particular question.
    ⏩ Jump to a question
    0:00 MAT 2017 Q1A
    2:09 MAT 2017 Q1B
    7:26 MAT 2017 Q1C
    12:21 MAT 2017 Q1D
    14:21 MAT 2017 Q1E
    19:40 MAT 2017 Q1F
    28:05 MAT 2017 Q1G
    35:50 MAT 2017 Q1H
    42:12 MAT 2017 Q1I
    47:43 MAT 2017 Q1J
    55:22 MAT 2017 Q2
    1:09:51 MAT 2017 Q3
    1:21:27 MAT 2017 Q4
    1:42:31 MAT 2017 Q5
    1:53:59 MAT 2017 Q6
    2:13:45 MAT 2017 Q7
    Errors in this video
    - None spotted yet!
    We're running a maths problem-solving livestream with a particular focus on Mathematics Admissions Test problems, live at www.maths.ox.ac.uk/r/matlive every Thursday.
    Download the questions in this video at www.maths.ox.ac.uk/system/fil...

ความคิดเห็น • 22

  • @puneetkumar2428
    @puneetkumar2428 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    thank u so much sir u r giving great content to uplift levels i m sure this channel going to be a rock !!! love from india

  • @fadysuis9382
    @fadysuis9382 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    aah i wish this year's mat will be like this one!

  • @neelagrawal2967
    @neelagrawal2967 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey James, for 1i could you solve this without factorising e.g. quadratic formula for roots or discriminant?

  • @user-co2nu5go9e
    @user-co2nu5go9e 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Merci beaucoup Jamés

  • @guillaumeatencia3185
    @guillaumeatencia3185 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video! Can someone explain at 3:18 how he "completes the square"? I have never heard of it, and its kinda essential to answer the question

    • @OxfordMathematicsPlus
      @OxfordMathematicsPlus  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "Complete the square" means to write ax^2+bx+c in the form (px+q)^2+r. It's helpful for solving quadratics, and things that look like quadratics. Here's a BBC bitesize revision article on completing the square www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/z3hb97h/revision/3 :) ^James

  • @markshekhtman4480
    @markshekhtman4480 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How much time would you recommend to spend on each section of the MAT?

    • @OxfordMathematicsPlus
      @OxfordMathematicsPlus  3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      As a first approximation, I usually say 60 mins on the short questions, 90 mins on the long questions, because that's a 40:60 split (like the marks). But you might personally find that a more nuanced approach is better for you (maybe you want to work on the long questions first, or maybe you want to spend more time on them) ^James

  • @alexpentland4501
    @alexpentland4501 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the vid, for question 4, 1:41:10, how do we know that we can we know that g and 1 join to make a straight line? Could they not meet at different angles?

    • @OxfordMathematicsPlus
      @OxfordMathematicsPlus  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sure, if the circles overlap, then the radii could meet at a different angle, but in the case that the circles are just touching, they have a common tangent at the point of contact, which means that the radii are aligned (both at right-angles to the shared tangent!). ^James

  • @LTY_CK_TS
    @LTY_CK_TS 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Why is Oxford uploading recent years question solutions? Will this year's test be extremely hard? xD

    • @OxfordMathematicsPlus
      @OxfordMathematicsPlus  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I've always thought it would be good to offer more support for people preparing for MAT, and this year we've been running a livestream covering MAT problems as part of our coronavirus response, over at www.maths.ox.ac.uk/r/matlive . No comment on MAT 2020! ^James

    • @LTY_CK_TS
      @LTY_CK_TS 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@OxfordMathematicsPlus Aha, I see. Thanks for reply!

  • @GaminglegendZak
    @GaminglegendZak 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi James, for Q3 part (iv), the final part asks you to find c. You said the way to do it was by guessing - was this what the examiners intended you to do? I don't know if this is mathematically correct, but I found c=0.5 using the point of inflection, as c is the point where the ratio of areas are equal (i.e. above and below this point the ratios cross 1, and hence the concavity of the curve of the ratios changes). Sorry if this doesn't make a lot of sense, I was just confused as guess work does not seem very elegant xD

    • @OxfordMathematicsPlus
      @OxfordMathematicsPlus  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Guessing a root is fine if we just want to find a value for c (I don't think I've proven that it's the only solution or anything like that). It might not be elegant, but it gets the job done! In your explanation, I'm not sure what you mean by "the curve of the ratios", sorry. ^James

  • @tas8050
    @tas8050 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    there's a mistake @48:35 where you drew the graph between 0 and 2pi, not between 0 and pi as shown in the integral. this doesnt affect the answer itself though

  • @epikrobert9589
    @epikrobert9589 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fot question 6ii and iii, must the swap be shown? Question states "even if a safe packing order exists" suggesting that it may or may not exist, would that mean that swapping it to show a safe order is optional
    Also for 6iv is it necessary to account for objects above i and j? Is answering the question based on just considering a packing order of just i and j in a vacuum good enough to secure all marks?

    • @GamerShortzzz
      @GamerShortzzz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      gravity still applies in a vacuum

    • @epikrobert9589
      @epikrobert9589 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GamerShortzzz that's neither the vacuum I was referring to, nor does it answer my question

  • @suphiaahmed6209
    @suphiaahmed6209 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not whole mat....xam...