Canon EOS R7 Review: Best sports & wildlife mirrorless camera!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 มิ.ย. 2024
- Get all your photography gear from milfordphoto.com/tonyandchelsea & support small business!
Chelsea & Tony Northrup review the Canon EOS R7, a 32 megapixel APS-C mirrorless camera for $1,500 (or $2,000 with the 18-150 lens). The R7 proves to be a versatile camera that can do it all: travel, landscapes, portraits, sports, wildlife and 4k/60 video. However, it's pretty expensive, and photographers who don't shoot action might be happier with the Canon RP's full-frame sensor. Additionally, we uncovered some serious problems using the 30 FPS (frames per second) with the electronic shutter: rolling shutter! As a result, we recommend choosing the mechanical shutter for action, which is still quite fast at 15 FPS.
0:00 Introduction
0:41 Milford Photo Sponsorship
1:40 Travel & Landscapes
3:02 Video
3:44 2 Memory Cards
4:05 Canon R7 vs RP image quality
5:02 Canon RP Overview
5:59 Natural Light Portraits
8:34 Milford Photo Sponsorship 2
9:05 Sports
11:34 Buffering (raw & JPG)
13:39 Wildlife
16:41 Studio Portraits
17:30 Summary - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![🎮เกมยิงปืนใหม่ ภาพสวย และ สมจริงที่สุดในโลก [ BODYCAM ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/My3l1owRY9I/mqdefault.jpg)
Get all your photography gear from milfordphoto.com/tonyandchelsea & support small business!
Great video!
You always compared the AF to the R5, is it safe to assume the R6 is the same as R5? Id be more interested in an R6 to R7 comp personally.
@@alankirby3839 Yeah the R6's AF is about the same as the R5. They're really similar to the R7. It's all really good.
@@TonyAndChelsea NO, R7 is not similar, it's better than the R6 and R5, it's more similar to the R3 / it has another layer of tracking ability and stickier than the R5 or R6 Also, recapture that non of the Sony body has even the A1; i have them all.
@@TonyAndChelsea great! thanks.
I called them after the video posted...no stock but they took my info. Honestly never expected to hear from them...guess who called today?! YES! Should be getting my kit in time for the weekend! Woohoo!
LOVE you guys, TYSM for your balanced and unbiased assessments of new releases that matter, subscribed, liked and commented!
one of the best r7 videos so far. very unbiased, well done Tony and Chelsea.
Thank you for sharing. I upgraded from Canon EOS M6 (APSC), to Canon EOS RP with good quality Canon lenses, following some reviews you made in the past and I am so happy with this step.
Thanks! This isn’t the first of your videos I’ve watched and learned from, but it’s the first I’ve seen a “thanks” button on. High time! Looking forward to more of your comprehensive and useful videos.
7D mark II users who are complaining, please stick to the 7D mark II so those who care about performance and are waiting for delivery of the r7 can get theirs in time.
At first I was slightly disappointed with the robustness of R7. But there had been 0 occasions where my 7D mark2 robustness was put into tests. So it's not a big deal
Yes 🤣 I'm shooting with a Canon rebel t5 so this would be a huge upgrade
@@hubcityrez6058 T6 shooter here... I feel you Dude!
Same sensor dynamic range as M6ii (and better than 7Dii). Ibis is not a reason for me to sell my m6ii and pay thousands of dollars for much bulkier lenses. I wait for M7.
@@barkan86 I don't believe that's going to happen. I'm shooting on an m6ii for wildlife, and while I think it's decent for that, it really wasn't made for it. The r7 is going to be much better which is why I'm upgrading. If you're waiting for another M camera, you'll be waiting for an eternity since I don't believe they will be making any new M series cameras. Plus an "M7" would be worse. An "M5ii" would be the one to look for.
That's the first R7 review that I can trust! Thanks Chelsea and Tony! Are you considering to make a comparison of the R6 with a 1,4 teleconverter with the R7? I'm really curious to se this
If (as you noted) you had a better lens mounted on the RP, why not put that same lens on the R7 and compare its portrait results with the RP? It's hardly fair to test a camera with a cheapo kit lens against one with a mid-range lens. When you matched them with F/1.2 L lenses, the only real difference was the increased DOF of a crop sensor, which is to be expected.
I agree with you John, both bodies have the SAME lens mount.....(maybe Tony was thinking M and RF and not RF and RF ) these folks sometimes makes me want to double scratch my head. I put my R7 on the 800 f11... Whao!! and on my 400mm F2.8 WHOA!!!! R7 with R3 focus engine...amazing. awesome for 1,400 bucks.
They compared similarly priced set-ups, because people usually have a budget.
@@smaakjeks and yet they also put it on the 100-500, because people buying the R7 for wildlife want good images. The R7 is only $500 more than the RP, so not a huge leap. They were supposed to be comparing the sensors, but it was really a lens comparison.
No kit lens is going to compare with an L lens or even the midrange zooms. T&C should have made it clearer that they were comparing apples to oranges, and why.
@@JohnDrummondPhoto You're entitled to your opinion.
It's doesn't matter , she is switching soon :)
Thanks for a great comparison video. This is just what I have been looking for.
Thanks Tony and Chelsea for your accurate review. Unbiased and objective.
We got ours this week (my son is the primary user) and it’s awesome. His R6 is going away and I am half tempted as well (I use an R5). At least for him the autofocus system seems faster and he has to switch to spot autofocus less often.
Very nice of Milford Photo getting the R7 for you to do this review. Been waiting for this because I have a friend on the fence with this camera.
I love you you guys are promoting Milford photo. My favorite little Photo shop
100% agree on the misname - the body, ergonomics etc to me say it should be the R70, leaving room for a similarly spec’d, beefier body, R5/6 button layout, a true R7!
Still tempted to get one as my stationary backup wedding video camera as it goes beyond 30min without an external recorder!
So, if the body was beefier, but otherwise it had the same specs, it would be a "true" R7? Personally I think the smaller, lighter body is a huge plus. Why carry more weight than you have to? Especially if you are using this camera outdoors for wildlife, which is what a lot of photographers want it for. Vertical grip? Again, just added weight. Buy an R5 or R6 for all around photography. Or an R3 if you really need "beefy". For hiking over hill over dale, up the dusty trail, for shooting small birds, this camera is perfect.
Brilliant review as always! Thanks!
A lot of good information about the 2 cameras. I use Nikon personally, but it's always nice to get a different perspective. Nice to see Milford Photo mentioned. They have a lot of good online and in person classes, too.
You guys are awesome, thanks so much for sharing another wonderful video, I am still waiting for my r7 order 😢
Good and worthwhile video, as always. Thank you.
I live on a different continent, but you have my respect for working with local a camera store. They have become a rare sight.
I'm thinking of upgrading from my Fuji X-T2 for portraits and sports (track & field mainly). Is this a good move? Or should I be checking out something else? I get very few misses with the way I have the Fuji set up, but I feel that autofocus has improved since that model across the board. Not excluding Nikon either, if there's something out there.
nice video chaps! So basically the RAW Burst mode and the horizon level function isn't available in AI Servo? been looking at the R7 for a while, had a play with it at a recent Foto Fair but Im slowly beginning to have doubts even as a sports shooter. Question is, does the 1000€ difference of getting an R6 justify it?
Thank you for this review. It was very helpful. Is it possible for you to test how is overheating in 4K fine with the screen flipped out?
Love your videos, on the buffer time, the mechanical Raw buffer time, was it with CRaw or Raw? also, what was the write speed of the SD card?
Thank you chaps that was really interesting. Hope my pre ordered r7 comes soon to England 👍
I'm looking to get a body to go with a 100-500mm RF, for wildlife stills. Wondering - if the rolling shutter artefacts make the 30 frames/sec shooting not-very-usable for fast-moving subjects and you end up using mechanical at about 5fps, why not go with the RP which can shoot at that speed and has other advantages? Does R7 have better animal/bird auto focus?
Just a question generally for whole R cameras, do you use electronic 1st curtain most of the time? Does it affect bokeh quality / cut off bokeh in your use?
😊🙏 nice video, thanks for explaining and demonstration
Thank you for the great video. How would you compare it with Fujifilm XT-4 and Sony A6600 for video?
Hi, I have one question that is most important to me as an event photographer, is it with the EF-EFS lens adapter in video photography Decreases the number of frames from 50 to 25 as in the camera R ?
And thanks for the video, I really liked
The R7 did fantastic in the Christmas room. It had no lag time and AF was dead on.
Great video, you guys are awesome. I just ordered an R7 last night and I get it on Fri. Can't wait to use it! I had an 80D but it got ruined with a little water accident and I had to go back to using my super T6 that shoots at an amazing 3 fps, ha!
Hi, I have one question that is most important to me as an event photographer, is it with the EF-EFS lens adapter in video photography Decreases the number of frames from 50 to 25 as in the camera R ?
Your reviews are great, but please can you help me decide which camera to buy for wildlife, especially bird photography?How does the Canon R7 stack up against the R5? I have searched but cannot find anyone who has compared the two and yet they appear to compete with each other in many ways. The R5 can even use a crop mode that makes it have similar image size to the R7. Is it just a case of ‘you get what you pay for’?
For a serious amateur doing all around family photography (wild life, grandchildren sports, street, etc) would you recommend the R-7, Fugi XS-20, or OM 5 (or1)?
I love it when Pixel is in the videos.
Thanks for this review. Do the EF and EFS lenses work well with the IBIS on the R7 ? It is difficult to find anything about this on You Tube.
I now own a R7, thanks to you (Tony and Chelsea). Previously was in the works to purchase a professional Canon, until wife surprised me with a Rebel t6i. Took us on a cruise instead.😊
Great review guys. I think you have told a prety clear story.
The limited availability of RF-S lenses is not a pronlem if one ne plans to keep 2 bodies: I have an R , so I will be using all my RF glasses on still portraits landscapes, and use RF lenses + R7 for sport and wildlife .
My question is: withba similar cost , would you suggest to buy the R7 and keep the R or try to sell the R , not to buy the R7 and go for an R5 ?? Thanks !
Good review . Still waiting for a detailed examination of the R7 high iso noise performance in comparison to a 7Dmkii and an RP/R .
How well the Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM EF will perform in the R7? Do you have a way to test it?
The rp is seriously underrated. I bought it refurbished for $900 and it can no camera at $900 can touch it. And what shocked me was how much sharper the images were versus the 6d2 even with the exact same lens and same conditions. I thought it would be a mirrorless versus of the 6d2 but I was wrong.
Yeah the RP is an amazing camera. I recommend it constantly and we still use it for video in our podcast and news formats.
Yeah, I got the RP and 24-240 kit lens for under $1500 2 years ago. A heck of a bargain! I'm now running an R6 with 24-105 f/4 lens and am thrilled, but at well over double the price...
What if you use Live view with 6D II? Should be just the same then.
@@paparazzininja7897 unfortunately, no. no matter how you take the picture, the rp will take a sharper picture than the 6d2. even on tripod. live view. view finder. it doesn't matter. I used the exact same lens and same conditions and took photos of solid simple objects like soda cans, mugs, wall decorations, etc. I took more complex patterns such as couches, flowers. I used single point one shot and ai servo. Even when you set the rp to eye af and the 6d2 to single point, the eye af will win even on a stationary object like a mannequin. I don't know how they do it. maybe it's just built-in sharpening? i don't know but it's easy to notice. the only advantages the 6d2 has over the rp is frames per second and battery life. but because you won't get the same sharpness, that takes away from the frames per second and it has a lower hit rate. I take more shots but less are usable. I still have my 6d2 but more as a memento (and a camera I can lend to people without worry about what happens to it).
Finally the video I have been waiting for , mine got delivered Wednesday !
Congrats!
As an RP owner who was considering the R7, this was so helpful. Thank you!
Moving from full frame to crop sensor?😲😲😲😲 Nooo
Thank you for this guys. I was looking at upgrading to a R8 but started hearing about the R7 and I think that will be best for sports especially with the IBS.
hey guys if you could help im trying to choose between two cameras the nikon d7100 and the d5600 which is better in terms of image quality and low light performance
Thank you for the review and comparison - I've have been thinking about an M6 upgrade and have been looking at the same candidates
What kind of card and raw mode were you using for the buffer tests? You should be getting 150-180 shots before it buffers using CRAW at 15fps with the mechanical on a 300MB/s card. People on forums are confirming these speeds. Otherwise around 50-60 with standard RAW. This is for wildlife, people aren't going to skimp on any of this.
Do you think there will eventually be sigma lenses for the rf mount? I have M mount versions of the 16mm and 56mm. Beautiful lenses and sigma has their mount conversion option. Not sure, if due to the lesser flange distance of the rf mount, it will possible. Also not dure, even if it's possible, that Canon would care enough to make it a reality.
Nice review - thanks! However, I am interested in how the R7 with the 100-500mm lens compares to the Nikon D500 with the venerable 200-500mm when shooting wildlife, birds, and sports? After all, this was your previous recommended rig for wildlife. Further, you can get this previous recommended combo for way less than the Canon outfit?
Was wondering this exact thing myself.
Now that the R8 is out I think all your recommendations for the RP should now be the R8 instead. Is there anything I am missing here? Of coure the R7 and R8 are nearly identical in price so it makes the choice easier if that is your budget.
What do you think about speed-boosters for canon r7. I hear the canon has some purple fringing but the 2 viltrox s.boosters seem good? There aren’t any reviews for photo and none comparing the canon to the 2 viltrox. Now canon has good crop bodies but limited crop lenses. So it seems like a possible work around but I’d like to be sure before recommending to friends looking to get into photography. Reviews please? 🙏
Great review. I agree, the R7 must be appreciated for what it is, a great wildlife and sports camera for all of us who can't afford the R3 or the R5...
As a bonus it's a great all around travel/family camera. I just wish Canon could give us more APS-C lens.
I think the R7 will prove to be a commercial succes for Canon and it will likely boost the sales of wildlife lens like the very good 100-500mm... a win for Canon.
correct
Not only could I "afford an R5" but I had one for 14 months. Then I got the R7 and started killing it ! I shot with my R7 exclusively for 5 weeks, and LOVED it ! Then I tried to go back to the R5, and it was loud, bulky, heavy, and just didn't give me the reach I need for the small birds I usually shoot. Nor did it give me the keeper rate. So I sold my R5 to get another R7 + the 100-400 + some other cool peripherals.
Seeing the portrait lenses reminded me of a comment I saw for the R8. Someone was suggesting putting a large heavy lens on an R8 which is a much lighter body could lead to balance issues in that it moves the center of moss forward beyond the body of the camera. Did you find this at all with the RP?
Thank U for good reviews. This one and one for GH6 compared with other cameras. Your videos contain information often other reviewers do not cover.
Does the lock button actually lock the mode dial?
Very annoying when the Mode Dial spins on you and continue shooting in the wrong mode.
I tested out the T7i in Yosemite once, and dial will easily free spin on you if you don't monitor it.
If it's more advanced than the 7D then it's a worthy successor. With the pre-capture feature, focus bracketing, 15-30 frames per second and 32 megapixels it's better than the 7Dm2 and even the D500 in every way that matters to me and I have shot with both of those. You mentioned the grip and the lack of screen on top being reasons it's not an update from the 7D. I don't need the screen on top and I'm sure the grip will be fine. Thanks for the review!
I feel like this is the successor to the 7D line. Because its the first it the line perhaps it should be compared to the 7D rather than the 7D2! Lets wait to see what the R7Mrk2 brings.
I was really hoping to see a r5 equiv crop vs r7 wildlife comparison... Any chance?
Any suggestions for smoothing out the video footage on the R7 using the nifty fifty lens on a camera slider? The footage jumps a bit
This is my first review (now that I sort of know what I'm doing) that isn't a dream for me as I'm going to eventually buy a R7, along with either RP or a R6. This was really nice to watch. I have a question for you. You mention there are only 2 lenses made to go with the R7. How did other RF lenses perform on it? You didn't mention it during the portraits but it seemed great.
I have ADHd what lens are you filming this on? its fabulous
Once Canon release some strong APS-C primes for the RF mount, the R7 will be incredibly difficult for me to deny. This camera has just about everything I'd need in a secondary body already. My dream is a fast aperture prime in the 24, 50, and 135 equivalent ranges and I'll be set along with a high quality zoom (a 24-70/2.8 or 24-105/4 would be ideal.) Plus I wouldn't mind adapting any kind of FF glass to it in a pinch. Hopefully between now and then the price will settle and it will be easy to find a new or like new body for a bit below MSRP.
I got interested initially, but there seems to be s bunch of caveats. 4k 60 limitations is a dealbreaker for me.
There is already RF 85 mm f/2 and Canon will release the 32 mm f/1.4 for RF-S.
@@okaro6595 32 f1.4 sounds juicy ngl
@@okaro6595 That's EF-M, which would be adapted lens. It's not a bad lens but it is not RF mount. There's rumors of a 33mm f1 RF mount APS-C lens, which sounds great. Hopefully it's a killer lens to kick off their prime APS-size RF lenses.
Ultimately the drawbacks of crop sensor cameras do not bother me if the camera's actual performance is great, I just take issue with (quality) wide angle options being available, even just the 18mm to 28mm FF equivalent range is often enough for anything I do.
Sigma will do it if there is enough demand.
thank you for this, because of the wildlife features i was thinking about trading up...but am i actually trading down?
I like these "on location" type videos rather than the studio based ones. A mix is good I suppose but more of these please 😃.
Could you do the same compare With the R7 but against the 90D in a video? Both photo and video in mind?
Great work, Great Video.
And its Mil-Ford. Got it.
Can you tell me which camera and lens you use to shoot the video, thanks
After adjusting the dials so that in the "M" mode they work the same as in the "Av" mode, to have the aperture under the index finger and the shutter speed under the thumb - during exposure bracketing (AEB) in manual mode (M), the camera takes subsequent photos by changing the aperture value instead of exposure time value, which causes the depth of field to change in subsequent photos. In this case, all the photos are useless and there is nothing you can do with them. What should I do to make the camera change the exposure time and not the aperture value during exposure bracketing in manual mode, so as to have different exposures with the same depth of field? I would like to mention that this problem does not occur in another Canon camera that I have, so it is probably a software error.
Does the difference of the image qualities result from lenses or from bodies in the case when RP/24-240 and R7/18-150 are compared?
The lens mostly
i wouldnt say the rp is significantly better in low light, based on the samples you provided both are about equal and aren't impressive. so better go for r7 and apply noise reduction.
Awesome! Happy shooting! :)
Very nice review. Thank you.
Camera manufacturers spend huge resources to bring out products that are as good as they can make them, and it annoys me to see whiney self-appointed You-tubers nit-picking. Your review covered the limitations of the camera is a respectful way, and were happy to stress the strengths. A delight to watch.
Great presentation and comparison. Please make a video on how the camera works with S and non-S type lenses with the R-mount and how the camera works with the adapter and old EOS lenses.
very nice kit awesome camera
I love this because I just got the R7 as my second camera, and the first one is the RP 😁
Looking closely at the body designs, I think you may appreciate the similarity in the layout of the controls that are common between the two
Is it worth upgrading from a Lumix G9 to the Canon R7?
I found the RF14-35 and RF16 to be wide enough to shoot Horseshoe Bend, which is one of the wider landscapes shots one would need to take on an any camera. The shot would have been easier on my R5, no doubt. But the point is that, paired with the two lenses I mentioned, the R7 is wide enough for just about anything.
Hi Guys, great video. One thing I have noticed is that fine detail image resolution of the R7 (have had mine for 3 weeks) in full electronic shutter mode is not as good as it is in 1st curtain electronic. Bt comparison my R5 is equally good in both modes. It is possible that I have a faulty camera but I wondered if you have compared it to the R5? In theory the higher MP count when allowing for the crop factor should give better feather detail (I mainly shoot birds) but not really finding that in practice. I bought the R7 as a back-up to my R5 but this shutter mode 'issue' and the really noisy other shutter modes (at least compared with the R5) is dampening my enthusiasm. Noise is also very apparent at all ISO's. The AF is brilliant though!
Exceptional review..very nice. How bout de new Fuji s?
Wait at 4:51 you shot the rp with a better lens than the r7 and compared sharpness?
Can we compare R7 with R6 Mark 2? I need the reach R7 allows with a 1.6 crop factor. I will buy RF 24-105 F4 and EF 100-400 F 4.8 - 5.6.
Is it worth spending on R6 Mark2? I will do wildlife and Portrait. I am not a professional but I know photography for 30 years. I have your book 🙂
Sports photography, is not really for me a big concern. I am more for still photography not much for moving objects.
Very interesting review, I think if someone understands the limitations you have pointed out this is definitely a good option at the price. For me, 15 frames mechanical seems like it would be my go to, leaving me to never worry about rolling shutter in any situation which was pretty bad. 15 FPS should be pretty good for almost any hobbyist I would say. Interestingly, I recently started doing bird photography with the M6 Mk II for the sensor size and crop factor, that also having a fast FPS and though I got some good shots, I was never blown away by the image quality, for that particular genre, my RP quality was much better, though of course at the sacrifice of FPS. Thanks for the comprehensive review :)
15 fps should be fast enough for just about any pro. The R5 and R6 are only 12fps. The only holdup might be buffering, but it wasn't that long ago that $5,000.00 pro action cameras were shooting 10 fps. As for weatherproofing, I always protect my cameras from the weather, whether I'm shooting a Rebel or a 1d series. Camera covers are cheap, and it's not like this camera has no weatherproofing at all.
Still cant bring myself to it just yet. 5Dmk4 is just wonderful with all the Canon glass.
I totally understand, I also have the 5Dmk4 and have recently purchased an R6. The R6 has some great features but at the end of the day I still find myself grabbing the 5Dmk4, I just love that camera 👍😎
How much is the canon 100-500mm RF lens?
While I can't say I agree with all your findings, I was impressed that you compared the R7 with the RP when most people seem intent on pointing out that the R7 is not an R5. In my case, as a current RP user, the R7 will be an additional body to do best what the RP does worst and still cost the same as one R6 (or a small piece of an R3).
That's a great take. I agree with your reasoning.
What all lenses R7 does is work well? like telephoto lenses?
How about that expososure / joystick combo? DP had that as a big issue...
SO glad I found this video. It is time to upgrade my Canon T3I and I have been on the fence between the RP and the R7. I tend to do more landscape and night photography, then wild life, action or movies. Definitely leaning towards a fun frame sensor but I didn't think the R6 was a good choice and I don't have the budget to move to a Sony a7 IV, as replacing all my lenses at once is cost prohibitive. Definitely planning to get the RP now.
I think a side by side comparison with the 7D Mark II would make a great video. A lot a people have forgotten that it is about taking photos. Strange evaluation of the cameras with different lenses. The nifty 50 would still be in peoples budget.
The 7dii is too old. Theres no comparison
As always a great review. The Canon RP sensor is old and does not show the full capabilities. Also you tested the RP with a better lens. The conclusion is that for the same price APS-C give you better video, IBIS and speed. The R7 is showing some rolling shutter. It is time Canon upgrade the RP with a new sensor and processor.
I think the RP is dead. M series will be gone too. They will basically be converting the old DSLR numbers into Mirrorless R numbers, the rest will be gone
@@mozzman9030 Well... maybe not. It looks like while they may not do any more M-series development at the moment at least; according to a briefing from Canon, as reported on the 'thephoblographer' website, they were told that the M-series sells very well to a market that values small, compact cameras and interchangeable lenses for convenience, and travel. They obviously see no reason to kill a viable economic market segment - and there is some logic in that.
The market is a complex one, reflecting that people take photos for many different reasons and with different budgets and constraints; and with cell phones killing off point and shoot cameras with fixed lenses (in the main), for those who want to bridge the gap between that market and the more expensive and bulkier R-series MILC, an M-series camera makes sense. I contribute to the Canon North America user forum, that takes questions from Canon users with issues or wanting advice. From those submissions a lot of people are still buying and using the M-series gear.
@@mozzman9030 the RP is still a good little camera especially for the cost. The better comparison would be between the R7 and the R. The RP is more useful to me at this point given the cost. The R would seriously need to come down in price considering all the competition it has at that price point currently.
Hey Tony & Chelsea, I currently shoot with a 1Dx mkii, I shoot nature, Motorsport and fast jets mostly. Do you think the R7 is a sensible swap? Sure I lose FF but would the other improvements outweigh that? Consider the sale price of the 1dx covers a lot of the R7 purchase...
Should point out as a hobby, not professional
Can you review this high megapixel sensor with Sigma 18-35 f1.8 and Sigma 50-100 f1.8. Coz I believe both the lenses were made to resolve enough detail.
As R7 is a mirrorless camera so I don't think there should be any auto focus issues just like these lenses have with DSLR's.
Hmm that's an interesting idea....
you mean best apsc sports & wildlife mirrorless camera!, Yes.
It’s probably the best aps-c camera on the market, but could have been much better. The shutter roll problem has been a problem with this camera, and now shown right here in the video. When the R5 first came out, it also exhibited some shutter roll (wasn’t as bad as the stuff shown on the R7). And now, Canon fixed the R5 and it’s better than the more expensive Nikon Z9. Although Nikon claims it’s new firmware 2.1 will address those problems and bring it up to par with the R5. That means the Nortrups must retest the Z9 with the firmware update against the R5. I bet the lighter, more efficient R5 will still be the winner.
@@p3rrypm nah. the fuji autofocus is crap, it misses much which makes its 40fps useless. and basically both would be about the same usable images or canon even more usable images. plus the canon would do better in video autofocus as well.
@@ytr8989 I just wish canon made new wildlife lenses. Nikon has the 500pf and now the 400 4.5, also the 300pf. Canon has either the big whites or a 30 year old 400 5.6/300 4. It makes no sense. Its time to make something for normal people
Hey! That’s Harkness Park! I just did a photo shoot there a few weeks ago 😂. I love that park!
Very helpful. For a picture but not sport wildlife guy. I cancelled my order placed for a new r7 and think about rp
It's very tough to judge a camera by it's "kit lens"... I notice when you mounted the RF 50 1.2 it produced stunning results. Kit lenses are meant to get you hungry for better lenses, not a long term solution.
I think the problem is that there is not too much really good glass for the Canon mirrorless APS-C size... so, this might be why the kit lens was included in the review...
Generally, I agree. But the 18-150 was well reviewed for the M mount, where it was seen as superior to the "regular" 18-45 mm kit lens and able to resolve well enough for the 32 MP sensor on the M6 II. My experience with both the M6 II and now the R7 has been positive, too. It's a great "walk around" lens
My favorite thing is how well Chelsea can play baseball!!! :-))
"Even with this *_not so extreme athlete_* reaction is the best part of this video.
Hey guys! Where can I share shots from my R7 with you? I'm liking it.
While I appreciate say nice things about cheaper cameras when possible but did you notice that you can buy both the RP and the R7 for the price of an R6 (or an R7 and an R6 for the price of an R5 if you consider the extra cost of the CF-Express card). I don't know about you, but I have lost too many shots changing lenses when something came up unexpected so I like that option. Did you compare the two using the 24-240 on each. I have both the R7 and the RP and use each for what it is better for. To me IBIS and using the larger battery is worth the price difference but for tripod landscapes the RP does win.
what are your (or viewers) thoughts on the IQ using CRAW formation this body?