Avangard Hypersonic Missiles unveiled: Is Russia ready for WW3?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 มิ.ย. 2024
  • In a recent and seismic leap in military technology, Russia has unveiled the awe-inspiring Avangard Hypersonic Missiles, a revelation that has sent shockwaves reverberating across the global stage. Picture this: intercontinental ballistic missiles so swift and agile that they redefine the very notion of defense, capable of outmaneuvering any existing system with a precision and unpredictability that challenges the boundaries of conventional warfare. These hypersonic marvels, known for speeds that defy comprehension, are not just instruments of destruction; they represent a paradigm shift in the dynamics of modern conflict. As the world grapples with the implications of this groundbreaking revelation, the stage is set for a new era of military strategy. The Avangard Hypersonic Missiles introduce an unprecedented level of capability, raising a crucial question: Could the deployment of these cutting-edge weapons be a sign of World War 3?
    In this episode, we'll comprehensively explore the Avangard Hypersonic Missiles, examining their key features and unraveling the extent of their capabilities in intricate detail. Stay tuned!
    Subscribe Now :
    / @military-tv
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 642

  • @yanbemopatton
    @yanbemopatton 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +270

    The very fact that Russia military is built to fight NATO and its allies while NATO is built to fight single country ( Russia) says it all.

    • @muzikri4203
      @muzikri4203 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Precisely thats true

    • @brianwesley28
      @brianwesley28 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      But, but, but AEGIS ashore was being deployed in European countries because of Iran! Russia never fell for that.

    • @brianwesley28
      @brianwesley28 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FrancisWaterworth-dv4hu You should watch Military Summary channel each day on TH-cam. Russia is taking over Ukraine. 😳

    • @muzikri4203
      @muzikri4203 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@FrancisWaterworth-dv4hu Its just special military operation. Not take over whole country. Just reminder for Ukraine to not join NATO only.

    • @larsnystrom6698
      @larsnystrom6698 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @yanbemopatton
      When NATO is crowding Russia military, we shouldn't be surprised that Russia builds their military to defend against it.
      NATO was the organization preparing for a war against the Sovjet Union.
      But it were for some reason used in an attempt defeat Russia.
      Why?

  • @Testio26
    @Testio26 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    When Putin announced the development of hypersonic weapons in 2018 along with the Poseidon submarine NATO laughed! Well they re not laughing now!!

    • @wadopotato33
      @wadopotato33 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Russian Weapons are almost always overrated, that said there was never any laughing. The West has a tendency to overrate Russian weapons.

    • @Doonit_hard_way_since_65
      @Doonit_hard_way_since_65 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Like the massive failure the Kinzhal is? Intercepted by a USA design from the 1970's. It's fun to watch Ru throw money at a technology they can't produce in numbers, that costs them a fortune, then is a complete flop on the battlefield. (armada tank, looking at you too)

    • @Testio26
      @Testio26 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Doonit_hard_way_since_65 You really believe the parrot that can’t even shoot down a slower a supersonic eskaders shot down a kinzhal?? Is this mentality of western weapons are the best has let to the humiliation of all US weapons supplied to Ukraine! Three years ago the Saudis complained to the US that the patriots couldn’t even intercept one Iranian missile when 12 of them were launched by the Houthi’s at their oil refinery in Jeddah! Guess who were operating the patriot system, Yes US army. Stop believing the hype about US weapons. They are useless!! Ask yourself why the US hasn’t retaliated against the Iranian when they launched a missile attack against a secret military training facility in Jordan killing US citizens!! Because the US is worried about retaliation by Iran!! Yes Iran! And by the way, the patriot systems were no where to be seen against a supersonic weapons! So keep believing

    • @user-yg6zp4ry2l
      @user-yg6zp4ry2l 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Doonit_hard_way_since_65 when they tell you that 100 out of 100 Kunzhal are being shot down, listen to them, because 99 objects are already burning

    • @justinh2701
      @justinh2701 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You think Americans are shooting thousands of cellular satellites into space 🤣. Missiles are cute but you haven't seen anything

  • @mjk7505
    @mjk7505 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +154

    Russia displays military engineering genius. Why America keeps poking the bear is sheer madness.

    • @UNotSeeMe2024
      @UNotSeeMe2024 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s mad from both sides

    • @rthelionheart
      @rthelionheart 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Mother Russia has no beef with anyone in Central and South AMERICA. It isn't all that hard to say the US instead.

    • @RU_Aleks
      @RU_Aleks 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rthelionheart There are no claims against the United States, but there are questions for the government and especially for Grandpa Joe and his legal capacity. This is some kind of surrealism in the terminal stage. I am convinced that "this play" has no intermission and one cannot rely on adequacy and prudence. Now almost all possible international institutions of diplomacy have been compromised in one way or another thanks to the ruling elite of the United States, the UN has generally become something like a rest room where you can chat with dudes and have a little discussion about the fucked up world. and go about your business in different directions.))
      So it remains to watch this historical madness with wide-open eyes

    • @YahayaYusuf-nc3pb
      @YahayaYusuf-nc3pb 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      and interfering in other countries' affairs

    • @ISRAEL-CONTROL-AMERICA
      @ISRAEL-CONTROL-AMERICA 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Just say US and not all american continent are as mad as US especially their government.

  • @LordMarksman14
    @LordMarksman14 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +114

    Meanwhile, the US military is still debating who gets to use the toilet.

    • @cblawrence6468
      @cblawrence6468 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @dicksonsisya349
      @dicksonsisya349 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @tarinax7526
      @tarinax7526 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Meanwile the US military dont show off what they have and we dont know about ;)

    • @minhnguyen96
      @minhnguyen96 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@tarinax7526wym the US military is having problems recruiting new troops and current troops arnt re-enlisting… LOL all advance weapons with no one to use it 😂😂

    • @mighty8
      @mighty8 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@tarinax7526 🤡🤡😂😂

  • @yudhihartadi6636
    @yudhihartadi6636 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +170

    Russia has right to defend itself ❤ 🇷🇺

    • @mosheshekelsteinspanbergbl5624
      @mosheshekelsteinspanbergbl5624 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@boobooasmr4391against the antichrist usgay.

    • @wanderingindigomanticore4920
      @wanderingindigomanticore4920 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@boobooasmr4391nato

    • @yudhihartadi6636
      @yudhihartadi6636 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@boobooasmr4391 against z3lnsk1 sadistic and barbaric regime my friend

    • @Orbital_Inclination
      @Orbital_Inclination 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@yudhihartadi6636when did Ukraine invade Russia? Your victim blaming mentality is pathetic

    • @jackboy288
      @jackboy288 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@boobooasmr4391agents you the wicked wast

  • @jaimemartinez8971
    @jaimemartinez8971 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +101

    34,000 miles per hour!! Damn dude!!!

    • @Feechurd
      @Feechurd 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Thats 60,000 kmph or 17 km per second

    • @jaimemartinez8971
      @jaimemartinez8971 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Feechurd I don’t know what could possibly stop this!!!

    • @bruswain9158
      @bruswain9158 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      It said 34000 kph not mph

    • @doriangray6633
      @doriangray6633 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I couldn't think that slow if I tried!

    • @serbianforestman
      @serbianforestman 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jaimemartinez8971 Its unposiblle.

  • @nyashachimwara6352
    @nyashachimwara6352 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +215

    It feels like one side is prepared for ww3 whilst the other side thinks they are bluffing, it's gonna be lit

    • @nosebleedd3820
      @nosebleedd3820 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      Lit? We are all going to die 😂 it’s not about fighting, it’s all about the money being made.

    • @yougetaspear7799
      @yougetaspear7799 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      😲🤔

    • @14k46
      @14k46 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      we will be fkd

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The problem I think is that Russia thinks that by building these advanced nuclear weapons, they will be held in respect and fear. The reality is, they are held in disgust, contempt and anger.. All this escalation will provoke is a western response in kind. Is Putin, so stupid to think that Western Nations can’t or won’t develop advanced nuclear weapons and rocket boosters and other innovations. In fact, the United States has already displaying a new intermediate range ballistic missile due to rushes breaking of the treaty. Putin Now began to escalate in an attempt to bully and threaten the small nations around the Russian federation imperial borders. Pin really looks like a fool and he will look more of a fool. He will soon be the most hated man in Russia by Russians.

    • @sixphilly1841
      @sixphilly1841 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@RedClipsYT
      ? That’s like telling a fish to not fear air.

  • @Katze.auf.Wassermelone
    @Katze.auf.Wassermelone 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    Ok politics are fine but nobody is gonna talk about that speed? Mach 27 is crazy, most fighter jets go between mach 1 and mach 3, the technology required for that speed while still being maneouvrable is insane

    • @moodogco
      @moodogco 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yh reentry speed from a ballistic maneuver etc it's no different from the reentry speed of the space shuttle or trident 2 ballistic missile etc

    • @ireallyreallyreallylikethisimg
      @ireallyreallyreallylikethisimg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I'll believe it when I see it

    • @moodogco
      @moodogco 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ireallyreallyreallylikethisimg fair enough

    • @IcarosImmortal
      @IcarosImmortal 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      High spped mouvering = maintaining same track for long distance, probably driven by an algorythm

    • @DimbweMazala
      @DimbweMazala 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      There is no fighter that has ever gone past Mach 3. The Mig25 and Mig31 are respectively the fastest fighters ever build capable of Mach 3 and mach 2.83

  • @richardtibbetts574
    @richardtibbetts574 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    But Sean Penn has said that we shouldn’t fear a nuclear war. 😳

    • @LB-mo1dp
      @LB-mo1dp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      CINE ESTE Sean Penn UN ACTOR , CE SPUNE REPLICI INVATATE DE LA ALTIII

  • @skll1822
    @skll1822 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    we created and tested this rocket and began to create a new one. This is the arms race. You cannot defeat Russia in a war, only peace.

    • @wadopotato33
      @wadopotato33 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because theyvhave nukes. In a conventional war Russia would be smashed by NATO...no contest.

  • @TodKopfstein
    @TodKopfstein 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    this thing changed everything. only time I've seen the vainglorious western mask slip is when they talk about the advancements of hypersonic Russian missiles... and also their thermobaric weaponry

  • @fredhampton321
    @fredhampton321 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +97

    Russia unveiled the Avangard hypersonic missile, a cutting-edge weapon capable of traveling at unprecedented speeds, evading conventional defenses. With the ability to maneuver during flight, this advanced technology enhances Russia's strategic capabilities, posing a significant development in the global arms race and reshaping military dynamics.

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, in Russia will still get completely destroyed by nuclear response if she dares use it. Obnoxious leadership runs Russia It uses these weapons to try and impress and bully, the small nations around it. All that will happen now is that the number and quality of weapons in the west will increase to respond to Russia, provocations and escalation. How stupid is this of Russia? Do you think we’re not capable of building impressive bed nuclear weapons and rocket boosters?

    • @grzegorzkowalski9413
      @grzegorzkowalski9413 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Russia is the best

    • @ninetysnano6071
      @ninetysnano6071 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do some research, Putin launched these off in 2018 when Trump visited to show off their capabilities. There’s a reason Trump said building the USS Gerald Ford was a waste of money.
      This is old news.

    • @Joel-pi2tt
      @Joel-pi2tt 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      More like a nuclear disaster in 2017 that was never perfected. Does it hit its target? Ehhhhh some times. Is it reliable? Absolutely not. Are their countermeasures not disclosed to the public? Yes. America only lets the public know of technology that is at least a decade or two old. Radars were upgraded decades ago to spot them. Also America has used hypersonic projectiles for a long time. Besides a single stealth bomber could knock out the launch site. Also new satellite weapons use directed dense EMP and other Directed Energy. Just like the Poseidon Putin will show this to the world not because it is awesome. But because he knows it isn’t and wants to impress idiots. Reminds me of the T-14 that uses a shit engine and manual reactive defences.

    • @wasswagodfrey915
      @wasswagodfrey915 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for reporting. The way you organize your report and the style of presenting is so good that it's hard to get tired of listening to the news

  • @lantanonlesiba6556
    @lantanonlesiba6556 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    USA has started farting with fear

    • @frozenlama23
      @frozenlama23 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ya we're shaking 😂 us has a new nucular weapon

    • @bocko159
      @bocko159 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@frozenlama23yea US have hypersonic missiles but they are still not operational yet 😂

    • @chimeremezelove1041
      @chimeremezelove1041 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@bocko159no they don't 😂

    • @sdinim8695
      @sdinim8695 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@bocko159they tested and failed miserably 😂

  • @ziauddin7948
    @ziauddin7948 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Russia's military technology is not what it was in 2nd world war # Russia has developed enormously its military weapons technology & has long range missiles capable of carrying nuclear weapons with capability to hit entire US & european cities # 🇵🇰

  • @benmartin6476
    @benmartin6476 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    We’ve only seen partial capability of the former Soviet Union
    Think about that

    • @wadopotato33
      @wadopotato33 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      AND Russians only had tobsteal the wealth of 140 million people to be that powerful. Let's be honest most of the countries wanted no part of the Soviet Union, but were forced to give up both their wealth and intellectual property to something they did not believe in.
      You think Poles like Russians...Czechs? Nah. Russians had to steal wealth to gain power.

  • @user-qd2np3cl8t
    @user-qd2np3cl8t 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    Russian Czar is the world's most powerful and destructive Hydrogen bomb ever made

    • @888Jt88
      @888Jt88 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Actually, the Tsar Bomba was the most powerful ever "tested" at 50MT. Russia has a Tsar Bomba II @ 100MT they decided not to test because of the environmental destruction it would cause. It's my understanding Russia now has a 200MT bomb as,well.

    • @knowledge3563
      @knowledge3563 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Gen. Mark Milley say ukriane lost two hundred thousand soldiers 200000
      russia have taken about 27%of ukraine in a year
      publish data on Ukrainian losses during the current conflict on January 14, 2023:
      - 1,157,000 dead
      - 234,000 injured
      - 27,230 in captivity,
      - 934 dead NATO instructors (USA and Great Britain),
      - 32,458 dead NATO servicemen (Germany, Poland, Lithuania, etc.)
      - 15,360 dead mercenaries.
      A message to the future generations never make russia feel threatened
      the difference between "looking dangerous" and "being dangerous".Russia
      describes military doctrine as defensive military doctrine. With regard
      to nuclear weapons specifically, Russia reserves the right to use
      nuclear weapons: in response to the use of nuclear and other types of
      weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies,in case of
      aggression against Russia with the use of conventional weapons when the
      very existence of the state is threatened
      How do Russian nuclear weapons compare to the rest of the world?
      Russia - 6,257
      America 5,550
      UK - 225
      France - 290
      China - 350
      Israel - 90
      Pakistan - 165
      India - 156
      North Korea - 40

    • @augustusomega4708
      @augustusomega4708 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@888Jt88 Russia has 6 GT devices loitering off both US coasts...1000 megatons each

    • @WringtonGamer
      @WringtonGamer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@augustusomega4708 and you know this how?

    • @augustusomega4708
      @augustusomega4708 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@WringtonGamer Trajectory estimation and putting a few known facts together.

  • @cedricjoseph5504
    @cedricjoseph5504 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    That's 9.4 KM per second.. 34,000km / hr divided by 3600 seconds.

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh so not as bad as I thought, so most of the US defence systems can take it out, sweat.

  • @michaelgoldman3812
    @michaelgoldman3812 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I understand that the Hypersonic Missile is capable of Speeds up to Mach 22, which NATO and the US have no defense for!

    • @Orbital_Inclination
      @Orbital_Inclination 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yes they do. The countermeasures for hypersonic missiles are exactly the same ones used for other types of missiles. The only change is that the defender needs to react faster.
      The Russian propaganda about them being unstoppable is bs.

    • @TheGrindcorps
      @TheGrindcorps 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No, not at all. Russia would not have developed this if that was the case because they have had Mach 20+ missiles deployed since late 1950’s. Boost glide maneuvering vehicles are very different from traditional reentry vehicles.

    • @bocko159
      @bocko159 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@Orbital_Inclinationyou are wrong and you know that

    • @rontobungoluciano7298
      @rontobungoluciano7298 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@Orbital_Inclination nope. specification says that the warhead is moving so fast that it is traveling in a cloud of plasma, which doesn't reflect radio waves, and which makes it a true stealth weapon, giving invisibility against any missile defense system. As far as I remember the design of that type of weapons started when US started to deploy a new missile defense system around russia, lying as usual, that it is not being built against russia, rather agains iran. but russians didn't buy that bullshit anymore, so they tried to oppose the deployment, then gave up and have built a new concept for the nuclear charge delivery to restore the parity, no matter what missile defense system is built. they simply don't care anymore.

    • @gautheuil6210
      @gautheuil6210 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@rontobungoluciano7298 The whole "plasma based stealth" is bullshit, NASA had that problem with their spacecraft re-entering the atmosphere and they developped better radars to fix it.

  • @user-hd8ys7tk6g
    @user-hd8ys7tk6g 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    We would do well not to provoke Russia, even if we are capable of defending ourselves. If there is a WW3 between NATO and Russia, nobody knows what might happen. Let's not forget that Russia is the world's leading nuclear power (and the USA not far behind).

  • @abuubaydullah1
    @abuubaydullah1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    When we consider that US and Russa are at the close's point less than 4 kilometres a part Although the countries are divided by the Bering Strait,that is 53 kilometres wide at its narrowest point it wouldn't take many bombs/rockets to distroy each other along with the rest of the world .

    • @axiondarion4899
      @axiondarion4899 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Maybe but Alaska is weak compared with Russia. Canada is between the rest of the USA and thats a big problem.. Russia could take Alaska easy., and from there they are very close to the USA and the USA far away from Russia.

    • @neilread9464
      @neilread9464 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@axiondarion4899 Russia would never invade USA, it would take 10m or 20m troops. And your going to send everything through the Bearing Sea. Whilst leaving Russia open to European invasion.

    • @chillwill5080
      @chillwill5080 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@axiondarion4899 Nothing about taking Alaska would be "easy" for Russia. They would never get air or sea control, and there is no transportation infrastructure, how they gonna get there? Where they gonna go if they do get there? How they gonna resupply without the element of surprise?

    • @axiondarion4899
      @axiondarion4899 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@chillwill5080 Sea control is not that hard with the hypersonic anti ship missles. If Russia downs a few ships with thse missles the US navy will fall back. Because the US can not make hypersonics ;-)

    • @chillwill5080
      @chillwill5080 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@axiondarion4899 LOL, you got to stop watching so much tv man. I dealt with Russia during the Cold War, they are much poorer now than they were then, you being hoodwinked.

  • @marcelodearaujoeliseu3113
    @marcelodearaujoeliseu3113 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Excellent explanation!

  • @ironhorse6688
    @ironhorse6688 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    The Avangard hypersonic missile will bring the United States to the negotiation table to cut a deal

    • @denchar1741
      @denchar1741 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @tu1469
      @tu1469 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      And this time Russia will do what america did and not want to negotiate anymore and say “you had your many chances son Sam”

    • @ninetysnano6071
      @ninetysnano6071 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      These missiles are not new……..Putin showed them off to Trump in 2018 when he visited Russia. You all just live under a rock.

    • @lascm5237
      @lascm5237 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      … a deal on what exactly? Everyone else was minding their own business before Russia started their 3 day Special Operation in an independent sovereign country 😂

    • @perrycarditi5
      @perrycarditi5 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ⁠@@lascm5237what kind of black hole do you live in? You seriously think Russia just woke up one day and decided to go into ukrain? By the way that 3 day BS was all from the US government and their simps. The US installed a puppet government in Ukraine back in 2014 then started arming it. Both sides, Dems and precious little Donald J Trump as well. Our current cackling VP went to Ukraine and said we want Ukraine Nato. This has long been a red line for Russia. Consider for a minute if Russia had one the same with Mexico or Canada and installed a hostile puppet government to build arms on the US border. Get educated. US is the trouble maker, we are the baddies.

  • @AntiNazi1945
    @AntiNazi1945 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Advice, don't be fools, don't provoke Russia, better think thrice,

    • @TheBlackwater200
      @TheBlackwater200 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      They won't listen to warnings

    • @darkslaerdark
      @darkslaerdark 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@FrancisWaterworth-dv4hu Russia is not weak.

    • @ashantethomas6356
      @ashantethomas6356 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      U don’t provoke the USA

    • @TheBlackwater200
      @TheBlackwater200 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ashantethomas6356 The US is not what it used to be it's a lot different now.

    • @polycarpmukemi5277
      @polycarpmukemi5277 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The us has weapons you've never heard of ,

  • @PERSIANstranger12
    @PERSIANstranger12 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    We are living in end times

    • @young749Au
      @young749Au 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Got about 10 years and maybe a few months before Jesus returns.

  • @derryjones1029
    @derryjones1029 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It kills me is they actually spent years preparing for this war instead of trying to stop it

  • @gouravmisra2317
    @gouravmisra2317 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Excellent 👌👌

    • @fathead1343
      @fathead1343 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You an orphan, hi look for a daddy instead of this little missy!

  • @Juan-md6go
    @Juan-md6go 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    Russia must double its efforts to achieve their goals. Russian rights must be recognised by the west .

    • @borali26
      @borali26 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Khinzal was also called "hipersonic" but patriot ADF destroyed them. After that Putin started to persecute scientists and in response CIA decided to invite them to US.
      Nothing that Russia does should be trusted until checked at least twice.

    • @denchar1741
      @denchar1741 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @ungijazapranje
      @ungijazapranje 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@johnregan6323bc the world oustide US does exist

    • @franskuijs3556
      @franskuijs3556 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which are ?

  • @centralmediachannel-cmc3219
    @centralmediachannel-cmc3219 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Russia must be the greatest power among all.

  • @angelrapallo-gz4sh
    @angelrapallo-gz4sh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Well that's how Flash defeats his enemies .flash controls the time .

  • @benmartin6476
    @benmartin6476 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We haven’t seen Russias capability yet
    I hope we never do

    • @mapachoshaman4859
      @mapachoshaman4859 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      All they have is powerful psychological war techniques ( propaganda ) to make you think they are superpower. Unfortunately for them, they are not. Ukraine conflict is a proof of that.

  • @adisusanto3127
    @adisusanto3127 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Everything have their own protection for loving things

  • @jzubav2971
    @jzubav2971 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice stuff😮

  • @omkardhange2310
    @omkardhange2310 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I nvr thought a missile will be this big..

  • @diegoflores9237
    @diegoflores9237 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    There should be buffer countries between nato and Russia. These countries would be demilitarized and neutral. And this should be demanded by every country because in case of nuclear war every country is going to be affected.

    • @michaelillingworth6433
      @michaelillingworth6433 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You do realise that there are no countries between East Russia and Alaska. Just a few miles of ocean.

    • @user-ls9lz5dt1q
      @user-ls9lz5dt1q 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@michaelillingworth6433
      Аляске пора вернуться в родную гавань :)

    • @dairyman7983
      @dairyman7983 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nope. 120 million people don’t want to be Russian slaves.

    • @Orbital_Inclination
      @Orbital_Inclination 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There used to be neutral nations between them, and then Russia invaded Ukraine

    • @Really250
      @Really250 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Orbital_Inclinationreally pretty sure the US over threw the government of Ukraine.

  • @jasoncrouzat7509
    @jasoncrouzat7509 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Does anybody remember that movie 19 that was released in 1984 war games that's what World War III is going to look like

  • @bretingebritson7684
    @bretingebritson7684 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I ask questions on here obviously just the same of does communications go up to satellite from pole with airways airwaves airwaste? And bounce old own to the antennas? Or do the go through the ground ccp and to devices for you folks?

  • @rusty90272
    @rusty90272 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes, they are.

  • @ghullammohiyuddin1940
    @ghullammohiyuddin1940 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Informative..Enjoy

  • @centralmediachannel-cmc3219
    @centralmediachannel-cmc3219 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    you are right and good to show all true .

  • @MuhammadYusuf-zz4di
    @MuhammadYusuf-zz4di 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Lets do it

  • @MenBehavingBadly.
    @MenBehavingBadly. 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hyped up super sonic 😅

  • @daudifungo5521
    @daudifungo5521 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Let Us Move the Operation
    Now Is the Time

  • @avisaviss3245
    @avisaviss3245 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This pipeline missle is very accurate 😂

  • @MrCrobee
    @MrCrobee 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice

  • @paulroberts7429
    @paulroberts7429 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You have to give it to Russia they are 20yrs ahead of America on science, nuclear-powered Hypersonic glide missile with nuclear warhead with unlimited range, Russia also have a nuclear powered doomsday torpedo called Poseidon, Poseidon as a yield of 100mt and is built to create tsunamis 1000ft high to flood Nato's coastal nukes, its is deployed on the 700ft titanium submarine k-329 Belgorod.

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio หลายเดือนก่อน

      This missile in particular the Avanguard (I don’t care to get the spelling right) it does not meet the criteria to be a hypersonic missile.

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio หลายเดือนก่อน

      It can also be intercepted by the AEGIS system deployed by the United States.

  • @steveabdelkoui5663
    @steveabdelkoui5663 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It can also glide without fuel. Says enough.

  • @northok2601
    @northok2601 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    RUSIA: El impacto avisara su éxito o no … quien quiere ser el primero?

  • @mtx_go5391
    @mtx_go5391 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If this is what they show. Then what power are they hiding

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nothing, that’s why for the past 40 years Russia was painfully behind in the airforce department trying to hold up to the F-22. America prepared for what Russia said they had and because Russia was lying they ended up way behind America.

  • @user-to5ib7bo8j
    @user-to5ib7bo8j 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing!

  • @user-po3dh2fy4g
    @user-po3dh2fy4g 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Авангард это страшное оружие! Континенты раскалывает на части

  • @dwayneroberts6616
    @dwayneroberts6616 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    There are hypersonic anti missile's already being armed on Japanese subs😂

  • @user-kw8en6jc6gffuhgikawwmwns
    @user-kw8en6jc6gffuhgikawwmwns 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    TRAZ CAMINHÃO QUE VOU FAZER SOLDAS

  • @mattmugno6277
    @mattmugno6277 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think it is bs. It cant out run a laser. Speed of light wins. As long as you can achieve radar lock you can lead it.

  • @user-ss4fs1eu5l
    @user-ss4fs1eu5l 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    27 macth😮

  • @darkdata5510
    @darkdata5510 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Light can be a wave or a particle... lasers waves = solution ..??.

    • @gabegaram6047
      @gabegaram6047 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you ever try to flashlight a buzzing fly in the kitchen in the dark....? I'm just asking ..

  • @Skander-M
    @Skander-M 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Joga essa porra em kiev😂

    • @brianwesley28
      @brianwesley28 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Won't need to.

  • @ogloc8405
    @ogloc8405 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Even if Russia has this weapon we still gonna all die if Russia ever thinks to fw the US

  • @AlbertoRossi-rs5dl
    @AlbertoRossi-rs5dl 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I sistemi missilistici RUSSI, sono FENOMENALI!

  • @Am-vo5cu
    @Am-vo5cu 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Watch out

  • @hj.maryatimaryati7181
    @hj.maryatimaryati7181 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    💪

  • @kostyafedorov8597
    @kostyafedorov8597 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good rocket science

  • @user-ds2el6kx1h
    @user-ds2el6kx1h 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Цаным Руссия адалати барпа ет дунйаны дагыт

  • @Hoyllandgeorge-qc5uz
    @Hoyllandgeorge-qc5uz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    May be not but they wouldn’t take any chances !!!

  • @Exodus000191
    @Exodus000191 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If it even exists.

    • @user-nl9hx2hd3b
      @user-nl9hx2hd3b 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ты сомневаешься🤔

  • @sadatzaman3511
    @sadatzaman3511 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This" Nudol" not "Avanguard".

    • @r0mi44
      @r0mi44 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don’t understand what’s going on anymore, they crossed a bulldog with a rhinoceros 😆😅

    • @r0mi44
      @r0mi44 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      may have accelerated the launch into orbit hypersound

  • @retroconsole_
    @retroconsole_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I thought the Patriot missiles used by the Ukrainians shot down some hypersonic missiles launched by Russia?

    • @user-yx3pq6mp4t
      @user-yx3pq6mp4t 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂

    • @gautheuil6210
      @gautheuil6210 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes and no, they did shoot down the Kinzhals, however it is not an "hypersonic" missile in the modern sense of the term.

    • @user-nl9hx2hd3b
      @user-nl9hx2hd3b 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂 Это пыль по сравнению с царь бомбой посмотри что это.🫵😎🇷🇺

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gautheuil6210yeah, and this thing isn’t a hypersonic either, by definition.

    • @gautheuil6210
      @gautheuil6210 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BoiStudio The Avangard? If what the russians say about it is true (big "if", I know) then it's an hypersonic glide vehicle.

  • @apakansaja8505
    @apakansaja8505 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    *No more silo... everything moves with all the art of deceptions being used.*

    • @r0mi44
      @r0mi44 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      he's not showing you comics

  • @HanabangIrawan-nu7uo
    @HanabangIrawan-nu7uo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Which country can stop this weapon ?!

    • @user-nl9hx2hd3b
      @user-nl9hx2hd3b 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Украина валенком 😆

    • @nabawi7
      @nabawi7 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      None

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio หลายเดือนก่อน

      The United States and most of its partners.

  • @Gumiho-34
    @Gumiho-34 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They couldn’t even intercept what more of avangard 🤦‍♂️

  • @user-hv7kt9zc3m
    @user-hv7kt9zc3m 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Okay the. Why do all the missiles you keep showing us are soviet era so they were cutting edge in the 1960s

  • @alalbatross6549
    @alalbatross6549 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ideal weapon.

  • @petrovich0437
    @petrovich0437 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Почему ракету Сармат (Сатана-2) называют Авангардом?

    • @alexanderchepak2009
      @alexanderchepak2009 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Никто ее так не называет.

    • @petrovich0437
      @petrovich0437 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alexanderchepak2009 Сармат никто не называет Сарматом? Отсыпь, а?😂

    • @alexanderchepak2009
      @alexanderchepak2009 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@petrovich0437 сармат и авангард - два РАЗНЫХ комплекса.

    • @petrovich0437
      @petrovich0437 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alexanderchepak2009 и в чём их отличие?😂

    • @alexanderchepak2009
      @alexanderchepak2009 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@petrovich0437 ракеты совершено разные. Абсолютно разные. Авангард на основе Стилета, Сармат новая тяжелая ракета.

  • @HanabangIrawan-nu7uo
    @HanabangIrawan-nu7uo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Avangard is the best nuke weapon from russia , the hyper in more than 27 mach

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio หลายเดือนก่อน

      27 was the cap, as in it can’t go faster

  • @centralmediachannel-cmc3219
    @centralmediachannel-cmc3219 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the west must see it and be careful dealing with Russia

  • @backbrown3366
    @backbrown3366 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Reshaping military dynamics. Must be because they made it pointy 😂.

  • @serbianforestman
    @serbianforestman 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This can only safe The World of western madnees.

  • @simonworthington-eyre3525
    @simonworthington-eyre3525 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Russia is at least 2 decades ahead of the US in terms of missile technology!

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are 40 years behind………

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia is 40 years behind

  • @Doonit_hard_way_since_65
    @Doonit_hard_way_since_65 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ya, we hear about the Ru super weapons all the time... except they don't ever work right, never live up to the billing, and generally fail miserably on the battlefield

  • @TonyL-gw4qx
    @TonyL-gw4qx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    You don’t see the USA or any Western Country deploying weapons like this anywhere!!!

    • @glennhearn401
      @glennhearn401 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      if only you knew lol

    • @tu1469
      @tu1469 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@glennhearn401knew what? Please tell me

    • @user-ff1wv8ti5d
      @user-ff1wv8ti5d 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Hirosima, Nagasaki

    • @silveriorebelo2920
      @silveriorebelo2920 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      because they don't have anything remotely similar

    • @TonyL-gw4qx
      @TonyL-gw4qx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@silveriorebelo2920 correct!!!!!!

  • @Lexios_iForcer
    @Lexios_iForcer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    so what? you not scarry anymore, suchechki

  • @darrenluck2612
    @darrenluck2612 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    USA need to treat Russia and China with a bit more respect

    • @gabegaram6047
      @gabegaram6047 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In the end they will. China can repopulate Usa about 4x and still have people left at home to make diner .

  • @Paul-th9es
    @Paul-th9es 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I dont think anything beyond set speed can re-direct. The acting forces at mach 10 plus. It doesnt make sense. A drag car thats going 120 mph, and loses control, though its off course, its still tumbling in set direction, now speed that up 5000 percent, there is no re direct. The data collected, if possible can perdict its target. Mach 20 is insane, but with the right tools may be more predictable.

  • @ahmadsaleh2819
    @ahmadsaleh2819 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does these have radiation?

    • @user-nl9hx2hd3b
      @user-nl9hx2hd3b 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Да

    • @nabawi7
      @nabawi7 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if it has a nuclear warhead then yeah

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nabawi7but nuclear weapons don’t have the same effect as reactor explosions so it’s far less catastrophic to the area hit. The worst part about the explosion is the blast itself.

  • @dawkdog666
    @dawkdog666 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can't remember voting for this a revolution is so well needed

    • @Indigo947
      @Indigo947 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you ever truly think your vote mattered?

  • @CesitarLabarthe
    @CesitarLabarthe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why don’t you say that the United States broke the two other treatments about short and medium distance nuclear weapons??? you

  • @duanebarton2424
    @duanebarton2424 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Still you never learn

  • @user-hs2pv9sy8h
    @user-hs2pv9sy8h 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The US won’t show its cards until it needs to.

    • @qwertqwerty5764
      @qwertqwerty5764 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Конечно, какой смысл, когда нет козырей.

    • @bhekindlovu6823
      @bhekindlovu6823 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They don't have cards papa
      Russia knows them more than you think

    • @chimeremezelove1041
      @chimeremezelove1041 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@bhekindlovu6823 I swear, Vladimir Putin is the most informed president in the whole world

    • @nabawi7
      @nabawi7 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not when the DoD admitted it doesnt have a defence for this missile.

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nabawi7they do, it’s called the AEGIS missile defence system.

  • @electronicsmotovlog
    @electronicsmotovlog 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bravo Russia💪💪💪❤️

  • @tonygee3284
    @tonygee3284 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    its something from world war 2 hahaha

  • @Joel-pi2tt
    @Joel-pi2tt 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The window passed already. Radar has been upgraded, and it is likely there are countermeasures not disclosed to the public.

    • @northok2601
      @northok2601 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Consuelo de los fans de Disney & Marvel

  • @fast_harmonic_psychedelic
    @fast_harmonic_psychedelic 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Also never mind the fact that even the standard ICBMs were beyond US ability to defend against. The US can't shoot ICBMs down. Maybe 1, or 2. Thats it.. let that sink in...

  • @OhYeah-qx9qn
    @OhYeah-qx9qn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just like their other hypersonic missile joke that keeps getting taken out by Patriots 🤣🤣🤣

  • @EstebanSerra-sc8tq
    @EstebanSerra-sc8tq 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Russia the Mother of Rockets

    • @alexxxXXXrus
      @alexxxXXXrus 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China makes first ever military rockets almost 500 years ago

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alexxxXXXrusand then the United States proceeded to lead in missile tech after that.

  • @chatsoon6802
    @chatsoon6802 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    this still a joke for west, untill Russian provided the test report with english language for them to verify.

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio หลายเดือนก่อน

      You do realise that this missile was Russia copying the US sprint missile and other US designs made in the 70s right?

  • @vladimirm7622
    @vladimirm7622 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The USSR was extremely strong militarily, but it was destroyed from the inside, technology is not a guarantee of victory

  • @muhammadnaimbahaman8413
    @muhammadnaimbahaman8413 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤❤❤

  • @e.s.5529
    @e.s.5529 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    yes, but is it reliable and can it be manufactured consistently where it can affect the geo-political battlefield, Russia has been known very publically to say one thing and the reality is completely different. Time will tell.

    • @northok2601
      @northok2601 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      El impacto avisara

    • @user-nl9hx2hd3b
      @user-nl9hx2hd3b 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      А что Россия говорила не так?

  • @djxhakaza1827
    @djxhakaza1827 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Rothschilds left the chat

  • @ambrogiogatti3429
    @ambrogiogatti3429 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NO NATO = NO WAR
    NO USA= NO WAR

  • @mohammedkuthubudeen9777
    @mohammedkuthubudeen9777 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Humans racing to kill their own self