Why is the Kh-22 the Real Beast in Russia's Missile Arsenal?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 626

  • @SenorTucano
    @SenorTucano 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +113

    Can we just pause for a moment to admire just how badass the Tu-22 Backfire is 😎

    • @capt.fedez.2184
      @capt.fedez.2184 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Absolutely

    • @luvanime1986
      @luvanime1986 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      My wife owns the flat she grew up in which used to be base housing at Dyagilevo Air Base in Ryazan, Russia which has been a bomber training base and officer academy for many years. The husband of my son's godmother (my wife's niece) just completed or has almost completed officer training their. Whenever I get to go, I sit on the balcony and in the afternoon until evening I watch the bombers fly overead. I especially like the sound of the turboprop bomber TU-95 (Bear) as occasionally one would stop by the base. I don't like war, but understand it happens, but there is something about seeing these big aircraft flying overhead and landing a half mile (from one end of strip) from your flat just gets your blood pumping. Due to health reasons I haven't been back in a few years, but hope to go next summer as flights are expensive for us and we just had an expensive roof repair done. But hopefully I can go next year and tour the museum they have next to the air base, the pics looks interesting.

    • @RU_Aleks
      @RU_Aleks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Если вы говорите о самолете, в начале то это Ту-160. Хотя носитель кинжалов - это МИГ-31БМ. Но стоит согласиться, что Ту-160 (Белый лебедь) - это настоящее произведение искусства.

    • @RU_Aleks
      @RU_Aleks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      If you are talking about an airplane, at the beginning it is a Tu-160. Although the carrier of the kinzhal is the MIG-31BM. But we have to agree that the Tu-160 (White Swan) is a real work of art.

    • @RU_Aleks
      @RU_Aleks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I'm sorry, but the Tu-22 and Tu-22M have significant differences. The Tu-22M is a bomber that can also carry the Kinzhal missile. And the Tu-22 is just a supersonic Soviet aircraft that was discontinued.

  • @RecluseRR
    @RecluseRR 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +810

    They can't shoot down a Kh-22, but can a Kinzhal. If anyone believes this, you need help.

    • @MegaEdward39
      @MegaEdward39 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +89

      Exactly 👍

    • @Mr.Brownstain-xf2ne
      @Mr.Brownstain-xf2ne 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +82

      Did the ukrops claim they shot down khinzal lol

    • @JAnx01
      @JAnx01 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +141

      The whole anti-Kinzhal campaign that happened in the media after the "Patriot incident" was obviously pre-planned in advanced. For a start, 2 explosions were seen on the Patriot site, they completely ignored this and continued claiming that all Kinzhals had been shot down by the Patriot.
      Secondly, the intensity with which they mocked and downplayed the Kinzhal missile didn't make any sense. Defending itself, is the easiest job for any SAM system because even when facing a maneuvering hypersonic missile, in the last stage it has to fly along a predictable path in order to hit. We saw the Patriot system lob 32 interceptor in the air, seconds before the explosions occured. Even if there were no explosions and all Kinzhals were shot down, that doesn't mean the Patriot has an easy time dealing with them. The primary purpose of a SAM system is to provide a protection umbrella over high value targets and this is where the Patriot fails because the Kinzhal missile reduces its effective range significantly. Thus, when you have SAM system intercept any ballistic missiles successfully, you cannot simply draw the conclusion that the ballistic missile is useless. The whole thing was a US military industrial complex directed psychological operation created to promote the Patriot systemand and downplay Russian weapons in general.

    • @trevorsutherland5263
      @trevorsutherland5263 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

      @@Mr.Brownstain-xf2ne CNN has run several articles with AFU members showing "Kinzhal parts" and saying they shot it down. 😂😂😂

    • @GeorgeKelmeris
      @GeorgeKelmeris 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@trevorsutherland5263
      C N N ? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @bobbymartin5220
    @bobbymartin5220 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +307

    remember, the Khinzel flies at 11 mach. Its punch is not just its explosives; it is its kinetic energy. the faster a missile goes, the more important kinetic explosiveness is, rather than the explosive it carries. the Kinetic energy alone of a 10 Mach missile can break a ship in half.

    • @Vrey662
      @Vrey662 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      remember, they re not hypersonic when they reach their target

    • @ObeyNoLies
      @ObeyNoLies 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Vrey662 That would mean less than half as slow, though.

    • @F.O.U.N.D.E.R
      @F.O.U.N.D.E.R 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      ​@@Vrey662
      You are hopeless

    • @LJC370
      @LJC370 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      ​@@Vrey662Of course not, this is why their flight speed phases exist. A tungsten tipped shell would slice an aircraft carrier in half!😂

    • @virginccyy7645
      @virginccyy7645 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's like Mach 3 to Msch 3.9 once it hits its target. It's a short range ballistic missile. The larger the ballistic missile, the higher and faster it comes down during terminal speed. An Icbm comes down around Mach 4-5.5

  • @Mephistopheles99
    @Mephistopheles99 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +119

    In a way they are right in saying they manged to intercept a Kinzhal with Patriot when the Kinzhall struck the Patriot battery on the ground.

    • @nakedsnake2669
      @nakedsnake2669 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Dude, you made my day :)

    • @ZwerChannel
      @ZwerChannel 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Infrastructural AA defence🙃

    • @richardallen9710
      @richardallen9710 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂

  • @GeorgeCunni
    @GeorgeCunni 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +217

    funny. Ukraine cannot shoot down significantly slower missiles, but has shot down 10 hypersonic ones)

    • @FindanDandy
      @FindanDandy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      it is indeed magical thinking by drug consumption.

    • @mmazourov
      @mmazourov 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      They also have 1:10 kill ratio and apparently Russian soldiers are stealing UKR washing machines for the missile navigation modules...

    • @GeorgeCunni
      @GeorgeCunni 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Moreover, we steal Ukrainian toilets because we don’t have our own + we ate all the hedgehogs because our store shelves are empty@@mmazourov

    • @carlosipec2270
      @carlosipec2270 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GeorgeCunni - LOL 🙂
      And Putin already died 50 times of cancers and several other health issues... Oh! And the shovels, people always forget the shovels. ;-)

    • @wintersnow3339
      @wintersnow3339 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Украина много чего говорит. Сбила 10 гиперзвуковые ракеты.. Цирк ! Не верьте слухам. Это невозможно физически.

  • @jean-marcducommun8185
    @jean-marcducommun8185 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +211

    For a secondary nation and gas station to the World the technological level of its arms is astonishing. May be the Russians were slightly underestimated. 😊

    • @MrSummerbreeze01
      @MrSummerbreeze01 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      RIP Johnny

    • @jean-marcducommun8185
      @jean-marcducommun8185 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-sd9dp7pw4z Well, wait t‘il you see the new Oldsmobile!

    • @TMHYAH7
      @TMHYAH7 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Can you imagine when Satan told John McCain that Russia is destroying the entire Western world, that they weren't really a gas station masquerading as a country 😅😅

    • @jean-marcducommun8185
      @jean-marcducommun8185 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Harmless responses get deleted here on YT so much on freedom of speach. Watch out!

    • @nogayvulf
      @nogayvulf 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Россию всегда недооценивают.А она живёт,и по многим параметрам превосходит страны Запада.

  • @robendert7617
    @robendert7617 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +236

    The speed and agility of the Kh-22 make it invincible in the face of the Ukrainian air defense, according to the Ukrainians themselves. The Kinzhal is agile, hypersonic, and due to the plasma layer formed by the friction around it, invisible for radar. Still, some want us to believe that the same systems that fail to down even one out of 300 Kh-22's manages to score a 10 out of 10 on the Kinzhal?

    • @trevorsutherland5263
      @trevorsutherland5263 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only CNN people believe that. No serious observer believes that.

    • @GeorgeCunni
      @GeorgeCunni 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      It is Ukraine. In 22, after one of the attacks, they officially announced that they shot down 110 missiles out of 100😁

    • @Vrey662
      @Vrey662 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      nothing especial about this missile yet acording to russia, its another super hyper weapon, sure

    • @mrwpg
      @mrwpg 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is nothing special about it, they have multiple hypersonic missiles and China just created a hypersonic smart shell weapon...@@Vrey662

    • @GeorgeCunni
      @GeorgeCunni 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      nothing special - it’s an American tamahawk, which was never able to hit the Syrian airfield, getting lost in the desert@@Vrey662

  • @dodoslovensko
    @dodoslovensko 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +144

    15 out of 10 kindzals were shot down by Ghost of Kiev .

    • @cepexxa
      @cepexxa 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      And he hasn't boarded the plane yet

    • @laughingbuddha1926
      @laughingbuddha1926 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂.. who told this figure that joker 🤡 and beggar zelensky. I think he personally visited to your home to share this information😂😂😂😂😂

    • @jackwhitetron
      @jackwhitetron 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Are they still fighting in Ukraine? I haven't been paying attention. I'm SURE Russia is near Kiev by now.

    • @ronaldedilbertoona1146
      @ronaldedilbertoona1146 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Maybe they already called up the Avengers. 😅😊😂

    • @ronaldedilbertoona1146
      @ronaldedilbertoona1146 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ukrainian propaganda will tell you that they are almost near victory against Russia

  • @gigie555
    @gigie555 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    Ukraine claims 10 out of 10m hypersonic Kinzals intercepted? If you believe that I've got a bridge to sell you. Actually all 10 Kinzals were intercepted...by their targets

    • @coldguy4926
      @coldguy4926 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      May I buy that bridge? I qualify for a 30% discount. I brought down this missile last week by hand sling

    • @miltonchadwick
      @miltonchadwick 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂😂The Whitehouse and pentagon are for sale. I own them.

  • @charlesachilefu
    @charlesachilefu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    10 out of 10 only confirms zero interception.

  • @mmazourov
    @mmazourov 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    RU has some incredible washing machines powering these things...

    • @AliMohamed-wd4wp
      @AliMohamed-wd4wp 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What western says 😳 🤔

    • @alsm974
      @alsm974 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@AliMohamed-wd4wpYou forgot shovels. 😂

  • @40over86
    @40over86 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +77

    Make peace you fools.

    • @TheRVSN
      @TheRVSN 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, like Dempsey and Makepeace.
      Russia has to stop Kiev junta - an irregular army of US state "elites" under command of the Pentagon.

    • @МорсМолин-с4ч
      @МорсМолин-с4ч 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Господь бог вы очень умный. Иди покушай и попей.

    • @garfield4530
      @garfield4530 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Whit peace the military industrial complex don't make money 💰.

    • @spudwesth
      @spudwesth 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nato wants to kill

    • @GarWhittaker
      @GarWhittaker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Go home russian aggressor..then all is good.

  • @wanchikibrahim3647
    @wanchikibrahim3647 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    From Ukrains report, Russia has already surrendered to Ukrain's forces!

  • @leofabbro456
    @leofabbro456 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    It's true that Ukraine shot down 10 of 10 Kinzhal. Here the detail : 5 with slingshot, 3 with bow and 1 with hand thrown stones, the last one goes back himself because he was scared.

    • @NDR-hn3ue
      @NDR-hn3ue 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Fell out of my seat

  • @Roruoni
    @Roruoni 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    So a couple things about the Kinzhal, It flies it's path at high altitude during it's hypersonic phase to avoid dense air resistance. It also uses EW features that present RADAR afterimages and "decoy signitures" that can be difficult to distinguish rapidly from the real missile, and for a period of it's flight it can not easily maneuver and is covered in a RADAR absorbing plasma cloud. The fact that it closes the distance so rapidly is one of the biggest challenges to shooting it down. You need a density of air defense to have a launch in the correct placement for when you can a fire solution that will intercept it. The missile will drop from hypersonic speeds to super sonic and begin maneuvers and use satellite guidance and possibly some form of seeker. It simply isn't plausible to shoot down this missile with a small number of launchers reliably. Rumors are from supposed inside sources, that in the best case the likelihood of a successful interception is about 15% for 2 Interceptors. Ukraine may have shot down a couple when pairing the MIM-104 launchers with Israel's advanced rapid response Iron dome RADARs and telemetry systems. The true difficulty of intercepting the missiles is due to the shortness of time available for a firing solution and the current placement of launchers. You can't get around this fact. It is also confounded by the fact that the original RADAR systems paired with the Patriot systems were confounded by the decoys which is why Ukraine also got the number of missiles fired wrong. Truth be told, if it wasn't for Space based reconnaissance of Russian air fields and E-3 sentry patrols/AWACs. The on the ground RADAR units would be lit-up by their RADAR signatures and have far more limited coverage. NATO is very creative in trying to fight a "not-war" with Russia. Any bystanders can see that these are, in fact, acts off war regardless of whether Ukrainians fingers push the final button. the real problem for NATO going forward is the lack of availability of interceptors. 10/10 Kinzhals shot down is such as exaggerated joke of a claim to make anyway.

    • @John-hu9qg
      @John-hu9qg 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Absolutely well said.

    • @Noblepilot_abrahamvwi_aeroplan
      @Noblepilot_abrahamvwi_aeroplan 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't even believe that any ever was. The Ukrainian general staff lies about everything! Not even inaccurate information but outright lies. Nothing in the Ukrainian skies can achieve the speed of a kinzhal or the Maneuvering Gs to intercept it. They can't intercept a Kh-22, they can't even intercept an Iskander M just yet but they have intercepted a couple of Kinzhals already. Wow! Great feat. What's left is improving on their lying capability because this is not even good enough propaganda.

    • @vanjamenadzer
      @vanjamenadzer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Also, the fact that the Earth is curved, these missiles could fly above the ocean and by the time any navy registers it's coming, it's coming in too fast and there is little to no time to react. USA invested all it's might into NAVY based superiority while Russians simply developed a missile to counter this. What good is a three carrier group hosting hundreds of raptors and lightnings when one missile can remove them from the playing field.

  • @recobozzor628
    @recobozzor628 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    There is only one country that can shot down hypersonic cruise missiles : Russia.
    Simply because they are the only one who have hypersonic cruise missiles.
    Shooting down hypersonic ballistic missiles (multiple countries have them) is very difficult, close to impossible...unless it's Russia, because ballistic hypersonic missiles are far easier to down compared to hypersonic cruise missiles...and Russia already have the AD able to do it.
    Nobody else have this AD systems.

    • @ViTeK9
      @ViTeK9 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Да С500 могут сбивать гиперзвуковую ракету ,но они ещё не поступили в серию

    • @qsfrankfurt9513
      @qsfrankfurt9513 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@ViTeK9The S500 is already in production and was already deployed more than a year ago

    • @rigorocks23
      @rigorocks23 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@ViTeK9 the s500 is already doing work. It was rumoured a couple years ago through back channels and a slip up from a russian oligarch that the s700 was being or was completed

    • @ViTeK9
      @ViTeK9 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@rigorocks23 то что разработка новых систем ведётся нет не каких сомнений, никто не остановится на достигнутом,это вопрос времени когда они поступят на вооружение

    • @guytech7310
      @guytech7310 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Depends on how much time between when the missile is detected, & an AA missile can travel to it before it reaches target. the US has THAAD for ICBM which are also hypersonic (up to mach 17). But very unlike able to shoot down short range hypersonic missiles.

  • @wasswagodfrey915
    @wasswagodfrey915 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    I thank you so much to reports you give us. The way you report , giving details leaves no stone unturned. Surely thank you . At least now we know that American weapons are not superior . Russia has more superior weapons. May God be with Putin and Russia at large

  • @Noblepilot_abrahamvwi_aeroplan
    @Noblepilot_abrahamvwi_aeroplan 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Intercept a kinzhal? That's simply untrue.

  • @zumbaman9377
    @zumbaman9377 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    FROM THE NETHERLANDS.
    PUTIN, WE LOVE YOU AND WE LOVE RUSSIA.

    • @lolkevandewitte1713
      @lolkevandewitte1713 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Maybe you should change ‘we’ in ‘I’, and just speak for yourself?

    • @seven7ns
      @seven7ns 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lolkevandewitte1713 Looking at the likes.....it is "we"....

    • @lolkevandewitte1713
      @lolkevandewitte1713 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@seven7ns wow, all 41 of you (not necessarily all being Dutch…) on a population of 17.7 million people! Impressive!

    • @dentt739
      @dentt739 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Uraaaa,,love you from Indonesia bro😂

  • @александрневский-ч1у
    @александрневский-ч1у 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +97

    Вообще ни "патриот" ни "ириска" не одной ракеты ни сбили In general, neither the “patriot” nor the “toffee” shot down a single missile

    • @markedgette5463
      @markedgette5463 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The Patriot is a old missile system.

    • @davidrickwood5924
      @davidrickwood5924 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most of Russian missiles and drones are destroyed by excellent air defences

    • @borbouhbi8649
      @borbouhbi8649 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@davidrickwood5924 этой ракете х22 60 лет!!! не смогли сбить не одну!!! а новые сбивают?

    • @Аллигатор-р8е
      @Аллигатор-р8е 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@borbouhbi8649 они модернизацию прошли

    • @borbouhbi8649
      @borbouhbi8649 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Аллигатор-р8е ну и? все проходит модернизацию, новые они как сбивают?

  • @trevorsutherland5263
    @trevorsutherland5263 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    Probably because they are much cheaper, therefore a lot more of them, and while they can be shot down, you need a high end AA system to do it, MANPADs or point defense not enough. They move at supersonic speed and pack a wallop when they hit. Doesn't have the "street cred" of the Kinzhal or Iskander, but probably accounts for most of the dirty necessary work. Also, I had no idea the Kh-32 can withstand hits from 20mm shells and AA missile fragments. That is flat out incredible.

    • @ObeyNoLies
      @ObeyNoLies 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That... is not a good explanation. I'm sorry but that falls completely flat. kh-22 is also important and no one is going "the Russian bombers are coming, get the MANPADS".

    • @Nitroat-xo4tj
      @Nitroat-xo4tj 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yep.. it cant be shot down.. it has self defense capabilities and even 2 atomic bombs on its shell cant bring her down.. She flies mach 378 and ukraines air defense got killed in the first week because of that. it can even hack in your iphone to call you.

    • @virginccyy7645
      @virginccyy7645 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm sure a large Pac2 Gem C missile could knock it out of sky especially when 2 are fired at each missile. That's 100kgs of explosives each missile hitting near the explosive part of the kh22.
      It is a huge missile, but US has been shooting these missiles in real target for 4 decades!

    • @guytech7310
      @guytech7310 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Also, I had no idea the Kh-32 can withstand hits from 20mm shells and AA missile fragments."
      Likely because the missiles do not fly in a predicable flight path. They alter the path of travel. AA only works if the missile follows a straight path.

    • @dekik.979
      @dekik.979 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nothing is invincible. You can shoot down a hypersonic missile but you'll probably need 20 missiles with the same price as hyper one.
      The math is clear. Defending this way will have you bankrupt in few months because each one costs $15 million @ least

  • @dalvinderbasi3495
    @dalvinderbasi3495 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Ukraine has never shot down a kinzhal missile. They have stated they have but there is no evidence they have. It is beyond Ukraine's ability to do so. Please get your facts right before making these videos.

    • @dalvinderbasi3495
      @dalvinderbasi3495 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Not a single word coming from Ukraine can be taken seriously.

    • @plotonapolonich5513
      @plotonapolonich5513 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Azerbaijan has with Barak system over Baku in 2020, November 9. Kinzhal is an air-to-land version of Iskander missile.

    • @dalvinderbasi3495
      @dalvinderbasi3495 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@plotonapolonich5513
      Okay very interesting.

  • @markhartman5029
    @markhartman5029 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    An "oldie", but a "goodie"! Congratulations Comrades!😂😂😅❤❤❤

    • @Аллигатор-р8е
      @Аллигатор-р8е 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Старый конь борозды не испортит" 😅 надеюсь гугл переводчик справится правильно с переводом

    • @goodnota
      @goodnota 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why fix it if it ain't broken ?

    • @shahwazirafridi7911
      @shahwazirafridi7911 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Russians have been beaten badly on air sea and ground.thwir weapons are outdated

  • @reginaldlagrone5082
    @reginaldlagrone5082 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    The U.S and NATO will come up with there own versions of the Kh-22, give it a new name, then claim they created the missile.

    • @recobozzor628
      @recobozzor628 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Sorry, but the NATO engineers and scientists are a joke. They can't even design something better then the crappy 40+ years old Tomahawk...and you believe they can do what Russians do?
      Please...

    • @alangunningham5667
      @alangunningham5667 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      or perhaps make one that actually works unlike all Russian myths so far

    • @aleksandrpulnikov684
      @aleksandrpulnikov684 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@alangunningham5667
      tell it to 60 French servicemen who intercepted one of such myths in Kharkov lately

    • @romantsoy2561
      @romantsoy2561 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@alangunningham5667 Oh they work my friend, they certainly do work! Just because you see a pic of one "fallen off" the airplane missile, completely intact, it doesn't mean that they all like that! Usually it means that the jet that was carrying it wasn't serviced for ages or had a prob with a pylon, or the rocket itself was taken from an old ass stock which had a 1974 use by date! But most of them do pound Ukraine and hit it very precisely, so yeah, they do work and very well of that!! 😉🇷🇺👌 What, you've never heard of American JDAMS not hitting their targets due to malfunctions and stuff like that? Cmon man, it's war my friend, everything happens here!!! 😜🇷🇺👍🇷🇺💪🇷🇺👏

    • @alangunningham5667
      @alangunningham5667 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aleksandrpulnikov684 do you actually believe that ?? if the missile was as good as it is claimed this would have already happened and been publicly displayed ... funny that hasn't happened ??? lol ...as I stated it's all Russian propaganda like most of the Russian claims ... if some were truthful we might believe some of the lies, but every claim made by the Russians about equipment is proved to be fake!

  • @pederschultz3283
    @pederschultz3283 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Russia has been the the first country to give missiles capabilities for "swarm attacks". Already the Granite anti-ship missile from the 80's has this capabilty. Here one high flying Granite might track the targets, and relay the information to several other low flying Granite missiles. If the high flying missile is shot down, another Granite will take over its place. The high flying missiles might all get shot down, but they might still guide a number of the low flying missiles to hit one or more targets.

  • @JaimeSalazar-wm6dh
    @JaimeSalazar-wm6dh 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    It's another super weapon uniquely improved.

  • @Desire123ification
    @Desire123ification 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Soviet relics updated. hundreds, thousands, or tens of thousands, depending on what's on hand.

    • @ViTeK9
      @ViTeK9 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      С советских времён остались сотни тысяч боеприпасов,их сейчас модернизируют и отправляют на Украину

    • @Zato4ka
      @Zato4ka 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      это ту 22 м3

  • @ssaini5028
    @ssaini5028 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Ukraine has shot down 20 out of 12 missiles 😂

    • @wst8340
      @wst8340 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Wrong,they shot down 100 of the 10 launched😮

    • @Kotov48
      @Kotov48 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      🤣🤣🤣🤝🇷🇺

    • @wanchikibrahim3647
      @wanchikibrahim3647 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Advert war but even then people can see through thei lies!

  • @AngelAngel-pc5mc
    @AngelAngel-pc5mc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Most important is the US, currently doesn't have active serving similar type of such missles.

    • @steve.schatz
      @steve.schatz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But the US has a secret weapon: Adm. Rachel Levine protecting us from climate change.

  • @SilverforceX
    @SilverforceX 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Ukraine air-defense is invincible, Patriot system destroys 110% of Kinzhals fired. Who cares if its Mach 10 or 11, big deal, its easy to shoot down. But the Kh-22 at Mach 4? That's an impossible task.

  • @rosszografov614
    @rosszografov614 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    The Russian Hypersonic Kinzhals missiles are almost impossible to being down, especially by Patriot airdefence systems, which were designed in the 70s...and periodicly updated but retained all their original limitations. This is why western airdefences can't shoot down Russian Hypersonics:
    First, Hypersonics have faster speeds.
    Second, Hypersonics have changing trajectories on route to targets.
    Third, Hypersonics detect launched airdefence missiles, and avoid collusion with these missiles.
    Forth, Hypersonics act in groups, like wolf packs, with decoys, and can change targets at anytime. Every missiles hasan assigned 'role' in the pack. This is nothing new in Russian technology. It existed since the late 70s in the Soviet Airforce. I served with it, as a radar operator and s300 missile system launcher... henceforth I saw first hand why these Soviet weapons work so well, and are very reliable. The s300 was also used as an artillery..vertually devastating all enemy sides.
    From all the Zelensky Nato claims that I have seen about bringing down Russian Hypersonics, I concluded only political and propaganda value...as Zelensky tried ao hard to please US donors, and show some achievement for all the investments the west poured into his bank account.
    However, in reality, everything he said was just comedy joke... from someone who has no clue about military technology... especially by the Russian Federation side.
    But sooner or later, all liers get found out.

  • @GeorgeKelmeris
    @GeorgeKelmeris 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    But...But, Ukraine is winning...
    Ukraine is advancing...To the Polak border, that is 🤣🤣🤣
    Remember in March - April 2022 ? Our Western Propaganda Outlets ( M S M ) plastered all over the news, " Russia is running out of missiles " 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.......Do you also remember in the early - to mid 2023, Russia wascusing shovels to defeat the Ukronazis ? Apparently those shovels went hypersonic 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @GeorgeCunni
      @GeorgeCunni 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We used up all the washing machines on these rockets, simultaneously eating the last of the hedgehogs😂

    • @lolkevandewitte1713
      @lolkevandewitte1713 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But but but…. It did take Putin’s special operation only three days to reach Kiev! Or didn’t it….🤔

    • @GeorgeKelmeris
      @GeorgeKelmeris 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @lolkevandewitte1713
      Putin said that " 3 days "
      Dude that was the western propaganda outlets ( M S M ) that splattered that worldwide
      Do some research research, get educated...
      Do you know when this Senseless Bloodshed in Ukraine began

    • @Tigr_Rus
      @Tigr_Rus 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@lolkevandewitte1713 Российские солдаты стояли под Киевом спустя 1 сутки после начала СВО, но приказ о штурме - не последовал, в Кремле решили, что будет слишком много жертв среди гражданского населения! Оборонять Киев было некому - практически все украинские войска были на Донбассе, поэтому на улицах Киева раздавали оружие всем подряд не спрашивая документов. Позднее украинцы расстреливали друг-друга из него принимая за "русских диверсантов"!😉

    • @lolkevandewitte1713
      @lolkevandewitte1713 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Tigr_Rus sorry, can’t read your language

  • @Phil-D83
    @Phil-D83 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Crude but effective

  • @remigiopalamini8378
    @remigiopalamini8378 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Complimenti alla grande federazione Russa
    Complimenti al grande Esercito Rosso Z
    Complimenti alla grande Marina Russa
    Complimenti al grande Presidente Putin il numero uno su questa terra il Dio del mondo intero

  • @jozefhorvat3625
    @jozefhorvat3625 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Absolutely brilliant 👌👌👌👍👌👍

  • @speedypete9694
    @speedypete9694 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    That’s crazy , they pay them in 386 missiles and 24 years later they are all shot at them .

    • @BadWolf762
      @BadWolf762 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Russians are just giving them back.

    • @robendert7617
      @robendert7617 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That was when the relation between the two countries was cordial. It all changed with the coup in 2014 and the Bandera worshippers came to power. Then the mass murder of Russians started and the interdictions on even the use of Russian. This led to the armed insurrection of the Russians living in the historic Russian regions annexed by the Ukraine at the independence. In 2022, Russia interfered in this civil war as guarantor of the Russian population in accordance with the Minsk agreements. Now the missiles are flying.

    • @GeorgeCunni
      @GeorgeCunni 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      all year 22 and even now Ukraine is fighting with Soviet weapons, which it received along with the secession, huge reserves of weapons that were never dreamed of by all NATO supplies in 2 years

  • @honahwikeepa2115
    @honahwikeepa2115 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Khinzal renders Carrier Battle Groups obsolete. US Colonel Douglas McGregor.

  • @selvathea5589
    @selvathea5589 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Ukrainian dictionary 2022: WORDS are louder than ACTIONS. 😂😂 self satisfaction of ukranian forces. Poor guys.

  • @jozefhorvat3625
    @jozefhorvat3625 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent video...
    Pleasure to watch it 😀😀😀👌👌👌👍👍👍

  • @Gort-zs5ph
    @Gort-zs5ph 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Too bad this site quotes western news reports, which have a 2% probability of being correct. Otherwise technical info is good.

  • @garynew9637
    @garynew9637 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Aussie here, ive always thought russians have a pragmatic and outside the box strategy and tech.

  • @carlosipec2270
    @carlosipec2270 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Ukraine was able to shot down all 10 KH47 Kinsall missiles... All 10, of the 8 (eight) Russia launched! The levels of efficiency are always trough the roof. LOL 🙂
    Next is Ghost of Kiev, again!
    And the shovels, jeez the damned shovels!!

  • @bonaanayaga
    @bonaanayaga 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thats a good looking plane

    • @RU_Aleks
      @RU_Aleks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you are talking about an airplane, at the beginning it is a Tu-160. Although the carrier of the kinzhal is the MIG-31BM. But we have to agree that the Tu-160 (White Swan) is a real work of art.

  • @Лукич-о1в
    @Лукич-о1в 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Советские дети, стали взрослыми.

  • @luvanime1986
    @luvanime1986 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Even the ukrainian generals came out later and admitted they had not been able to shoot down a single Kinzhal missile.

  • @AvidAfrican
    @AvidAfrican วันที่ผ่านมา

    The US lauged when Ukr said they shot it down 😂😂😂

  • @NitoKuvell
    @NitoKuvell 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Isnt the KH22 and Kinzal the same thing?? Like one is its factory/production line name? And the other is the popular name??

  • @KorbenDalasCZ
    @KorbenDalasCZ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The X-22 that is in service with the Russian army is not the same as the X-22 that was introduced into service in the 1960s. The original X-22 missiles were upgraded to the X-22M variant after a few years, the original inaccurate X-22s were not produced for very long. All used in Ukraine are M variants with improved accuracy and X-32 deeply upgraded variants produced after 1990. The original X-22 could only carry the Tu-22, the Tu-22M3 could only carry the upgraded variants and the original could not.

    • @Юрий-и2ж2в
      @Юрий-и2ж2в 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Как противокорабельная ракета может быть не точной? Там стояла радиолокационная головка наведения.

    • @KorbenDalasCZ
      @KorbenDalasCZ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Юрий-и2ж2в It was inaccurate in that the first X-22 only recognized a ship above the surface, for attacks on land targets the circular deviation was very large. There was also a relatively large inaccuracy in ship targets. The inertial navigation system was not perfect. Radar guidance had great inaccuracies.
      Inertial system (autopilot) of the APK-22 type with radio-command correction and active radar homing warhead (guidance based on the reflection of electromagnetic radiation of the homing warhead from the target)
      Therefore, only X-22M variants were produced for the TU-22M2 aircraft from 1974, and all modifications were then based on this improved variant.
      the inaccuracy of radar guidance given by frequency, repetition rate, signal modulation, signal processing and its delay in the autopilot apparatus. It is the same as with anti-aircraft missiles, for higher accuracy, high frequencies must be used, the lower the frequency, the higher the inaccuracy.

    • @Юрий-и2ж2в
      @Юрий-и2ж2в 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@KorbenDalasCZПочему вы решили, что на этих ракетах не ставят новые системы наведения, также как на ФАБ-500 с умпк.

    • @KorbenDalasCZ
      @KorbenDalasCZ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Юрий-и2ж2в all current x-22s are better than the original variant.

  • @iliyaehrenburg2374
    @iliyaehrenburg2374 33 นาทีที่ผ่านมา

    A Ucrânia admitiu que mentiu e nunca interceptou nenhum Khinzal.

  • @ismaelangula6705
    @ismaelangula6705 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The modern periodic table arranged a Russian scientist

  • @АлексейПолегенько-г5х
    @АлексейПолегенько-г5х 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Великая Россиюшка я безконечно безвозмездно и безкорыстно и всецело люблю ❤😘тебя советую заговорщикам украины и сша молиться чтобы наше командование не сделало из вас Хиросиму и Нагасаки

  • @FactsMythsofLife-dx4yz
    @FactsMythsofLife-dx4yz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Surprisingly the Patriot has not shot down the KH22 but has shot down the Kinzhals???

  • @lh1690
    @lh1690 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Can withstand hits from SAMs? I'd like to see proof of that.

    • @Awaken2067833758
      @Awaken2067833758 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You won't, that video is 5 years in a Ukrainian prison or a trip to the meatgrinder

    • @lh1690
      @lh1690 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Awaken2067833758 Surely Russia can provide proof of this obtained during testing.

  • @ivanivkovic573
    @ivanivkovic573 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Imagine that UA say: we cant intercept Kinzhal...ofc they gonna say we got them all...

  • @jozefhorvat3625
    @jozefhorvat3625 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bravooo Russia 👍👍👍

  • @michaelbriggs4029
    @michaelbriggs4029 7 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    As far as I'm concerned whatever Ukraine says is just a bunch of hot air😂

  • @jonestelmond6177
    @jonestelmond6177 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I couldn't believe that you said that missile causing trouble to ukrainian,s defense system but not USA and EU😮

  • @mktoracle
    @mktoracle 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is a beauty.

  • @ilyaginsburg1888
    @ilyaginsburg1888 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What? What had intercepted 10 Kinzhals? The old women throwing cans with cucumbers? :)

  • @Sadbuttrue12345
    @Sadbuttrue12345 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Я не сомневаюсь, что сейчас есть окно возможностей, пока нато не имеет сверхзвука, надо добивать этих разжигателей войн!

  • @zumbaman9377
    @zumbaman9377 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    EVERY DAY I LOVE RUSSIA EVEN MORE!

  • @bryanwilsonpannie1604
    @bryanwilsonpannie1604 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not necessarily, they they employ those missiles on critical targets they believe will endanger their forces

  • @solomon3845
    @solomon3845 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Russian hardware stand up and effective against the Western Hatdware...One Nation against many...In the war Russian material is impressive....at the start of the war Russia was using old hardware but now especially their artillery have really impressed me...any country buying Russian hardware are in good hands🥇

  • @steve.schatz
    @steve.schatz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Does this mean that US aircraft carrier battle groups are obsolete?

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes. American Colonel McGregor said that.

    • @안안승익
      @안안승익 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      미 항모는 러시아 미사일의 사정거리안에 들러오지 않아요 무섭기 때문

  • @mamdouh-Tawadros
    @mamdouh-Tawadros 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am no expert in any military subject, but I heard that Ukrainian alleged downing Kinzal, were none other than the much older versions of kinzel I.e Eskandar Rockets. Which naturally Russia would use it a lot. But who knows ?

  • @JulioHernandez-zs5pb
    @JulioHernandez-zs5pb 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For sure these missiles are not cheap.

  • @АнтоДив
    @АнтоДив 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Мало кто знает, но еще Российская Империя вела передовые разработки ракетного вооружения.
    И противники этого были.. собственные генералы..😢

  • @SjjsjEmdmsjsjans-jh6pe
    @SjjsjEmdmsjsjans-jh6pe 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No a single kh 22 has been brought down...but they killed the kinhzal...?

  • @pavelborisik174
    @pavelborisik174 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's impressive how cold War Era weapons are sufficient for today's battle

  • @dremad7512
    @dremad7512 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kh22/32 was created for attack fighter carriers. So they was created for penetrating SAM systems

  • @empirecyclops
    @empirecyclops 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Then how to defeat that missile if it enablles to communicate with other missiles, that would be braking nerves of defence operators to counter the treat..make Peace is the way to stop the missile

  • @chrisbryden8102
    @chrisbryden8102 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Oh gawd! Ukraine shot down 10 out of 10 Kinzhal’s. With what???? Patriots???? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @hankcester
    @hankcester 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bravo

  • @zero1breaker
    @zero1breaker 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    kh-22 able to withstand hit from air defenses? is this an armored missile?

  • @StefanMilosevic-m2v
    @StefanMilosevic-m2v 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I don't get it why Russia do not use tochka-u missiles? I know they are retired, but they have it in large numbers.

    • @sebastianconstantin5176
      @sebastianconstantin5176 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      i think they are short range.

    • @pmue437
      @pmue437 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Tochka-u are outdated 2019 from the Russian army and replaced with Iskander Models.

    • @СергейГоворухин-й7о
      @СергейГоворухин-й7о 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Украина било по мирным точкой - у. Если бы мы ее использовали, то нас бы обвинили и в атаке кассетным боеприпасом донецка и вокзала краматорска

  • @rogerhudson9732
    @rogerhudson9732 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    But it doesn't have a big enough warhead. It looks like a strategic weapon being used with a small conventional warhead.

    • @guytech7310
      @guytech7310 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I am sure it can accept a nuclear warhead if needed just like the Kinzhal missile.

    • @Zato4ka
      @Zato4ka 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      может быть ядерной это точно

    • @Awaken2067833758
      @Awaken2067833758 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The kh-32 conventional warhead is the same size as the one in the tomahawk, the one in the kh-22 is two times that

    • @belliduradespicio8009
      @belliduradespicio8009 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      In the 90ies US Intel was shocked to find out just how big it's warhead really was when they finally managed to get solid information on it, it's over 1,000kg, a single one could cripple or sink a supercarrier.

  • @constantinradu6354
    @constantinradu6354 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This guy is on Ukrainian weed.

  • @Parisian71
    @Parisian71 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Слава нашему любимому товарищу Владимиру Путину, который вернул нашу «гордость» и военную «силу» перед лицом «угрозы», исходящей от США и их союзников по НАТО!! Мы не сомневаемся в достижении ПОБЕДЫ на Украине и ПОРАЖЕНИИ западной агрессии.

  • @consciousmachine6246
    @consciousmachine6246 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When it comes to Russian Missiles...there is absolutely no match for them, these missiles have the speed of bullet...

  • @umyawin2262
    @umyawin2262 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Too much superb this oldie beautifully formidable Tu-22 for a ragtag army, its lethal radius is the whole continent .

  • @zeeforhad
    @zeeforhad 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Ukraine will send satellite to Mars soon with the help of Poland.

  • @marcelogartner9450
    @marcelogartner9450 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The missile is manufacutred for a compex WW III scenario,so there is a need for more sofisticated anti missile ,systems.

  • @kofi9834
    @kofi9834 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That's my Russia

  • @Jwalker0075
    @Jwalker0075 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wonderful weapon

  • @kanyamagaraabdallah8300
    @kanyamagaraabdallah8300 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    oui la russie va milplie ces missle de missile se l´KH 32 ou KH 22

  • @zazu9117
    @zazu9117 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So as of making this video, Ukraine is still hit by it's own kh-22 they paid gas with.

  • @wolfgangpollersnr5259
    @wolfgangpollersnr5259 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    At 24 : 1 ,one missile just might hit the target and it might have happened ( no concrete prove available) . That is a tremendous success rate for the Patriot.

    • @F.O.U.N.D.E.R
      @F.O.U.N.D.E.R 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ????, like its time in saudi

  • @velimirkolundzija4451
    @velimirkolundzija4451 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The only problem is that western air defense systems as soon as they apply mig 31 or TU 22 immediately know what to expect. But the more planes there are enough to carry these missiles, the more difficult it will be.

    • @RU_Aleks
      @RU_Aleks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you are talking about an airplane, at the beginning it is a Tu-160. Although the carrier of the kinzhal is the MIG-31BM. But we have to agree that the Tu-160 (White Swan) is a real work of art. ту-22.. ты уже второй кто спутал ))))

    • @RU_Aleks
      @RU_Aleks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm sorry, but the Tu-22 and Tu-22M have significant differences. The Tu-22M is a bomber that can also carry the Kinzhal missile. And the Tu-22 is just a supersonic Soviet aircraft that was discontinued.

    • @velimirkolundzija4451
      @velimirkolundzija4451 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RU_Aleks Many thanks for the explanation but it's really not necessary, whether I added one letter or a number that you omitted absolutely does not matter for what I wanted to say! Kinđal can carry both TU 160 and SU 34 and some versions of SU 35, what is most important is exactly what I said, the more Russian aircraft can be a carrier not only for Kindjal but also for other cruise missiles, the greater the West will have to shoot them down, in essence it is much better To launch missiles from the air than from the ground, which is logical given that the missile has a greater range and speed, it would be best for Russia if it managed to produce a number of MiG-35s that could carry cruise missiles because it is the cheapest and fastest solution for Russia.

    • @RU_Aleks
      @RU_Aleks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@velimirkolundzija4451 Нет, только два самолета являются носителями ракеты "кинжал", это бомбардировщики миг-31 и ту-22м так как эти два самолета имеют наибольшую скорость палета 2800км/ч и 2300км/ч

    • @RU_Aleks
      @RU_Aleks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@velimirkolundzija4451 No, the Kinzhal missile is carried by only two aircraft, these are Mig-31 and Tu-22m bombers, since these two aircraft have a maximum flight speed of 2800 km/h and 2300 km/h.

  • @killman369547
    @killman369547 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It's a big F U missile with a big F U warhead. Plus they've been upgrading them. They're may look like 1950's missiles, but under the hood they are not 1950's missiles.

  • @MacDonaldkachala-cm5gc
    @MacDonaldkachala-cm5gc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Long time we have been hearing stories, we have this, we have developed this e t c, from the same people, so they thought their friends were sleeping, praising them

  • @SphericalShades
    @SphericalShades 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So Kitchen/kh22 unstoppable
    While Kinzhal Misserable they said
    These guys Logic mustve been Rigged by EU monetary Aid

  • @zirkon-jq8tn
    @zirkon-jq8tn 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Kinzhal ist niemals abgeschossen wurden.

  • @Hugo_Furst
    @Hugo_Furst 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Those 10 Kinzhal missiles Ukraine claims to have intercepted, were intercepted by buildings and ammo warehouses.. 😂

  • @tedpro9652
    @tedpro9652 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    🇷🇺🇧🇾🇵🇱❤

  • @quazars236
    @quazars236 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    of course they can shoot down the Kinzhal. in fact out of three that was launched they've managed to shoot down seven! - and they did it without igniting the booster of the Patriot.

  • @akcobra5418
    @akcobra5418 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I bet Putin has the best washing machines on earth 😅😊

  • @hankcester
    @hankcester 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The patriot cannot shoot down hypersonic misiles

  • @johndewey6358
    @johndewey6358 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    KH-22 is highy inaccurate and has landed on many civilian targets in Ukraine.

  • @diyed.5515
    @diyed.5515 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In short, every flight of white swans causes NATO hysteria.

  • @guns4liberty
    @guns4liberty 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    of course they will