Just How Powerful is Russia Zircon Hypersonic Missile
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ก.พ. 2023
- Zircon anti-ship hypersonic cruise missile is designed to attack ships at sea and targets on land at speeds of up to Mach 9, giving enemy missile defenses little time to prepare. Zircon missile is designed to use speed to penetrate enemy air defense systems. Depending on the missile’s flight profile a U.S. Navy carrier battle group defended by the Aegis Combat System would have between two minutes and 20 seconds to detect, track, and shoot down the missile.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![[TH] VCT Pacific Stage 2 - Week 2 Day 1 // RRQ vs TLN | DRX vs PRX](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_OWt_-Lu3AE/mqdefault.jpg)
Zirkon 9mah
Kinzal 10mah
Avangard ~20mah
Sarmat~25mah
and Russia is shit pure country,
more conlusions?
1.7 miles per second thats crazy speeds 👀
@@orbetobe more like 10m, based on the hypersonic strikes the Russians have done in Ukraine!
@@orbetobe Then you are deaf because tehy wouldnt be developing a weapon that is useless
@@orbetobe 🤣🤡
@@orbetobe Gotta say I love people like you. What did you say, 50km accuracy, hah? It's an anti ship missile and can hit precisely target on 1000km range. Tested billion times and it's already in the ships. But there must be people who would spread anti Russian' propaganda, right?
@@orbetobe aad a neuclear warhead. that error is good enough🤣 throw five of them error gonna reduce too😉
Beautiful Missiles!
Russian Frigate Admiral Gorshkov, carrying Zircon Hypersonic Missiles entered the Port of Durban, South Africa today
Joint exercises with ships from South Africa & China.
We will build a better world. Bye US you are truly hated.
They destroy everything,How?
Look at to my beautiful weapon. moving carefully.
@@johnhamilton7762 Don't talk nonsense you fool.
@@hobbyman47 Scud Launcher - C&C Generals
Imagen the panic in US navy😂😂😂😂
vladbot@gregvoight8616 imagine if you could spell, the dictionary manufacturers would be in a panic. Btw, is the Moskva still at the bottom of the Black Sea?
They sweating like a mofo
Russia leads many fields in the arms industry and the US doesn't want the world to know it. Russian defense investment is $45 billion, while the US is $705.39 billion., Russian military has the best nuclear weapon -Russian SS-18, best conventional weapon -Russian FOAB, most advanced tank in the world, the best air defense the Russian S-500, and The best hypersonic missiles in the world. and all this with an investment of $45 billion.
vladbot@SoydeCubaCompay You know today 2023/05/05 that the Ukrainians shot down a hypersonic missile, you know today Wagner is planning to leave Bakhmut?
In fact US invest less than Russia in new weapons. Because of those 705B usd 95% goes for salaries of soldiers and mercenary worldwide maintaining 800 military bases around the world, Colour Revolutions and bribes, only fraction goes for new weapons development.
@@surdzo this is what i wanted to say too 800 Military bases around the world has an insane cost too
@@surdzoyou forgot that weapon manufacturers put massive prices for pathetic things like fail35. While the Russians don't have to deal with that since arms manufacturing is state owned.
@@ruzziasht349🤡
It’s unstoppable, no navy has the technology to stop such a missile, even if zircon is not loaded with a warhead just the kinetic energy can sink a warship,
Or if they put dense material as head, it has great power at such speeds
@@spicesmuggler2452 they do have a very dense material at its head, because normal material cannot be used for such high speeds
valdbot@raymondsarvarian9074 Ukraine today shot down a hypersonic missile 2023/05/05 how does that make you feel?
But ukraine just claimed it downed several hypersonic missiles with patriot rockets that failed to down antique scud missiles in the Iraq war. .
@@wildtatz I saw the videos - did you?
This is the Real Game Changer
vladbot@rajahmohan but 468 days later, they still didn't beat Ukraine - they said 3 days hahahahaha
This is why Western Allies aircraft carriers are “sitting ducks” floating targets. At this time there is NO anti missile defense systems for Russian or Chinese hypersonic missiles.
Submarines are still out the primary deterrent!
I suppose TH-camrs have inside information about secret air defense systems of the US lol
Multiple sources have stated there presently is no air defense for Mach (5-10) hypersonic missiles. Hopefully your correct and there is Top Secret air defense systems that work??
If not, the surface naval fleets are all sitting ducks.
2099: Saw the same report initial testing both Russian and Chinese missiles were off target. However, now they are deadly accurate. Scary thought if your on a US Carrier off the coast of China.
@@TimeTheory2099 yep, we all saw it when Kinzal took out patriot battery last week in Kiev 😊
@@atillasari9232 Of course they have :) That is why the U.S. bought 122 RD-180 engines in Russia for US rockets.
and classified this information) 😊
There's no defence from zirkon, it's invisible
Is the F35 invincible or almost invincible?
Whatever is your answer apply to zircon!
@@vickclash7955 INVISIBLE 💯💯💯
@@vickclash7955 it is bit different than F-35 regarding stealth, F-35 stealth is based on shape + radar absorbent materials. Zirkon as well as all hypersonic missiles create a plasma cloud around because of their insane speeds..same as any space vehicle which enters the atmosphere from space at hypersonic speeds but at much higher altitudes compared to Zirkon, and no radio, radar or whatsoever signal cannot reach the vehicle during its hypersonic phase when entering the thicker atmosphere, difference between Zirkon and any other space vehicle is that Zirkon goes hypersonic even at denser atmosphere or at lower altitudes..so with the current anti-air defense technology it is practically impossible to intercept it
Ukraine just shot one down using the Patriot system - not totally invisible - no wonder USA spent a lot less effort in developing their own hypersonic missile - they have the real truth of what hypersonic offers or not offers ---- not the putler propaganda
@@iviciaableyou would need IR tracking to hit it when it's going hypersonic
300 Nato officers killed in 120m depth bunker ( mostly brits and poles ) in the beginning of february is quite nice result for Zirkon i think
Khinzal did that and it also hit an 60m reinforce concrete bunker back in February 120m dept with 60m reinforce concrete hit an ammunition dump where the Ukrainians fire the Tocha U that killed civilians in Donetsk.
have you got that information from russian tv ? :D
vladbot@hobbyman47
Ukraine today shot down a hypersonic missile 2023/05/05 how does that make you feel?
Very talented nation.
about what? povetry, mess and no civilisation ? What did they give to others ?
@@BoogieBMWE34 they gave us airliners, AC transformers, radio receivers, television, artificial satellites, ICBMs Vladimir Kosma Zworykin (1888/1889 - July 29, 1982) was a Russian-American inventor, engineer, and pioneer of television technology. He was Russian by birth American by trading his for a pack of noodle soup.
@@BoogieBMWE34 or are you a hater that we watch tv because of a Russian we have artificial rubber thanks to them.
People were questioning kinzhal, so it turned out to be seriously formidable weapon.
Russia after WW2 was always ahead wester technologies regarding materials, consequently engines... so they was ahead in space program (Russia was first in every single aspect of space exploration except from putting "man on the moon") and also was ahead of hypersonic flight.
After fall of USSR, Russians start to work together with USA on hypersonic missiles so I do believe that Americans take as much as they can from Russian side (just like Americans starts using Russians RD-180 engines in their larges space rockets or how that bought Yak 141 plans that later was incorporated in F-35 or how they took MIR2 technology and "together" build ISS Internation Space Station...).
Western are only good in propaganda - they even manage to associate word "Propaganda" with USSR although it is a western word (look for Edward Bernays book "Propaganda")...
That's why the US is successful and not such a piece of crap of failed state that Russia is nowadays: they are open minded and flexible and smart enough to adopt everything that makes sense and advances their cause while at the same time not compromising the life quality of their citizens. USSR essentially collapsed because it spent all its resources to build fancy military technology while treating its citizens like slaves. Meanwhile, the West did they same but with a fraction of the total available resources compared to the USSR. Basically, that's the difference between a free Society and a enslaved Society.
You just proved it yourself...
@@anbo8200 Bullshit. You are not from USA when you can write something like this...
@@anbo8200 fail state lol
@Zar this is USA stealing Russia technology.
@@anbo8200 A man who thinks he knows a lot about something he knows nothing about - looks very foolish.
It is 60/40 chance to know exactly the effectiveness of Mach 9 missiles. There is no navy in this world that have a perfect air cover so Mach 9 is really a something. From the russian side, this is a psychological effect. It will tell you that no one will radical enough to put their fleet to threaten the Russian soil.
no one is threatening russian soil currently, only vice versa
Navy wont really have to worry since hypersonic missiles can not maneuver, I can post the math and even Russias own patent stating so. They are only good for hitting static targets and even then have a large CEP do to their speed making them best suited for first strike scenarios this way even if they miss they still damage something.
@@ThatCarGuy Also the B-1B Bomber can theoretically hold 31 AGM183 Hypersonic cruise missiles INSIDE of its internal bay and external pylons.
@@ThatCarGuy sure it is. Navy now more worry about the social media than a mach 9 missile even thou the data says this is scary than a tomahawk. I'm technical man so i'm not saying which ideology wins.
The reality is, if the Russians really want to attack a battle carrier group they can make it hundreds km away without come any closer. I think many people really aware about this fact.
By the way i dont want see evil in everything. So how is mama's cooking today?
@@battletacticsgaming9384 Hypersonic missiles wont be used on ships do to their lack of maneuverability, Russia patent below stating they can't maneuver, need to shut their engines off, can lose stability and even self destruct coming back down to it's target. But first lets do some math. Zircons top speed is mach 9 right? Converting to km/s that is about 3km/s. Say you wanted to move a single degree for 5 seconds at 3km/s you would be off course 15km... Almost as much as the Chinese test missed by.
"Russian patent number 2579409 relates to the field of rocket technology, and more specifically to hypersonic cruise missiles equipped with a hypersonic ramjet engine. The invention describes a method of application and device hypersonic cruise missile, allowing to solve the problem of performing a combat mission to destroy ground and surface targets of such a missile. The described invention is designed to maximize the combat potential of the combat module with the scramjet.
The design mode for the scramjet are high-altitude cruise conditions while maintaining the estimated cruise speed, and the need to reduce the altitude and flight speed creates difficult technical problems due to the fact that:
an engine designed to perform a hypersonic mid-flight at high altitude is not able to continue to work at low-altitude trajectory sections associated with a decrease in the flight number M, hence, the rocket must approach the ground or surface target with an inactive engine;
characteristics of sustainability and controllability of the combat module with inactive scramjet significantly deteriorate, loss of stability becomes possible;
there is also a danger of destruction of the scramjet design due to the increase in pressure in the flow part of the engine while reducing the Combat module from the march height before hitting the target."
Very informative good job
Targets don't need to waste time targeting zircon because it is covered in plasma cloud preventing radar detection.
10000% TRUTH!!
True
@kingdomgateway7677 but 468 days later, they still didn't beat Ukraine - they said 3 days hahahahaha
Se convirtió en una guerra desgaste ya que no es solo contra Ucrania tienes que ver la montaña de dólares y armas que enviaron a Ucrania.
If it's covered in plasma, it's sensors will be blind so it won't hit it's target😅
Haters: noo thats not true 😭😭🤣🤣💪🏻
Ikr, 🤣 that side has the control over the media, a slight amount of info about Russ weapon they would get a stroke..
They think they're untouchable lol
Lol as if the US does not have the same capabilities the only question is which is cheaper or who make it faster production in war time scenario
@@joemango9782 they dont , it is what it is
And it ist: I worked in the zircon project zircon hits the target at mach 20, 10 faster than a typical bullet. Thank you
Russia is bless with intelligent and patriotic people
Go Russia
valdbot@hamrass9123 they planned to take Ukraine in 3 days, how intelligent was that? that was 468 days ago hahahahahahahaha
@@ruzziasht349why are you jealous 😂😂
@@ruzziasht349did you ever hear a Russian OFFICIAL say 3 days? It's something your media cane up with.
Most intelligent people are purged or jailed, the country is led by idiots for idiots
Joe Biden won't even have time to say, "Hey Man"
This could be true. As khinzai hypersonic has already proven to exist and work perfectly
They are already being used in Ukraine
@@user-hy4jt8sr6y good I hope they wipe Ukraine off the map
Kinzhal missile already downed by patriot
@@hernanielegaste2777😂
Holiwood : Russia has shovels...
I don't know! Just ask Putin to send you one and see by yourself! 🤣
Soon india will have similar hypersonic cruise missile "Brahmos 2-K" ❤️ which is being in development jointly by India and Russia. And one more missile which will be known as Brahmos NG.
And separately India also developing hypersonic weapons under "Project Vishnu"
Doesn't matter. China will copy and make them better :)
Brahma--Moscow!
@@stanislavt6376 that's bullsh*t. Ruski army is so poor that China must send you weapons and ammo!
@@mosnicolae1678 🤣 it's not a toy brother it's called missile.
@@mosnicolae1678 I`m not Russian you idiot! And America is so poor because one little country from Europa sends American army shells for a howitzer 155mm!?? Did you see how that stupid sounds? But Russia is poor so much that every country in the world wants its resources?
In summary, in terms of the shipping/conveying vessels, the USA remains ahead. However, in terms of the delivery systems and projectiles, Russia's way ahead. Which all means that the Russian vessels are likely to get sunk but these would likely have released their hypersonic loads by then. Which again means that Russia will lose comparatively (much?) smaller in effect than on the receiving end. Sunak especially, to take note of this.
Bullshit 💩
Vladbot@sjv9147s in 468 days and Russia still didn't take Ukraine, they said it would take 3 days. The Moskva is still at the bottom of the Black Sea - the Russians are clowns.
You forgot about impossibility of detection of object covered in plasma by radar. So detected can be only initial stage , immediately after launch.
@masakeris but 468 days later, they still didn't beat Ukraine - they said 3 days hahahahaha
@@ruzziasht349 *Russians have enough time to grill NATO!*
@@bori3604 The combined defence expenditure for members of NATO was approximately 1.26 trillion U.S. dollars. Russia spends only 80 million U.S. dollars - so tiny in comparison it's laughable.
@@ruzziasht349 if zelensky and his masters of 40 nato countries fight russia in a media war then they would have already won...acording to them ukraine is already annexed moscow...(BTW where did they said its going to be 3 days war?...no body belives all those BBC and CNN propaganda )but this is a real war... they (ukraine and 40 most developed countires) still couldnt beat russia... feel sory for your media propaganda..
@@ruzziasht349 so nato spends approximately 1.26 trilion... and compared to russia its huge right? Why they couldnt bear russia yet? ha haha haa haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
0:47 Russia Zircon Missile Speed Mach 9
US Tomahawk Missile 0.75 Mach
🇷🇺
AMERICAN LRHW.....4,000 mile range ...top speed Mach 10, so they say and its DEPLOYED....Watch out world, The Americans have caught up..😮😮😮
Trump sad mi have rocket ,no rocket only but smart and in Siria from ,10 one comes on target.
This comparison of U.S. Tomahawk missile and Russia Zircon missile, like comparison between of any U.S. presidents, especially Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin 😊
@@willwozniak2826 je just from bam frrrrrrr .
@@willwozniak2826 oh you mean the same weapon Ukraine tried to use and got demolished?
3:37 Russia Powerfull Fastest Missile
Sarmat
Avangard
Kinzhal
Poseidon
Burevestnik
🇷🇺
These missiles theoretically can be intercepted only by same hypersonic antimissle or laser impulses from several directions. That type defense is still at least decade away
А что делать, если на небе появиться тучка или вдруг пойдёт дождь? Попросите отложить запуск "Циркона"?
valdbot@victorotvertchenko2665 they shoot them down when they slow down - happened today 2023/05/05 in Ukraine by a patriot system
@@ruzziasht349😅 ypu are again jealous
Zircon is not used yet
KINZHAL is hypersonic but ballistic
Cruise missiles have high maneaurability and Accuracy
KINZHAL is a cruise missile
😅I was first used in Syria 7 years ago with precision strike and USA was stunned and not able to detect it
@@pathaktech8577 7 years is a long time bro, the Americanies and the Israelis can now kill these soviet weapons with ease.
No, you just need an intercept course with a lead and a normal missile would do just fine. As far as I know, the only anti-air system with hypersonic interceptors is the Arrow III/IV, but those levels of speed are typically not needed for the same reason that a football receiver doesn't need to be moving faster than the thrown ball to catch it. If you know where the missile is, where it's aimed, and how fast its going, it's easy to calculate a location where you can send a slower projectile to create an interception course.
The argument based on reaction time is missing a couple of points: the missiles fly faster than the interceptors and they can manoeuver.
India & Russia Joint Parteneship Development Skyfall Missile & Avanguard Missile
Two evil doing evil things together
Arming invading forces
@@mdhasiburrahman8806 🤡🤡🤡
@@mdhasiburrahman8806 who did you refer to as evil? India and Russia?
@@paolorossi784 In their opinion, everyone who does not obey the United States is evil. In reality, the US is the real evil empire.
Powerful and pretty fast actually at-least in *Modern Warships* 🎮 📱
Or the Admiral Kuznetsov?
It’s like a van racing a formula one car 😅
*BYE BYE US CARRIERS U RE OBSOLETE AND EXPENSIVE PILE OF SH1T HAHA*
For fact it's already tested in Syria
And attack was damn successful 😊
Just imagine if Russia has same or similar military budget as usa..
More better comparison between Russian Zircon missile and American Tomahawk missile like this >>> Russian President Vladimir Putin relaxed sitting in luxury Aurus 🚗 and speeding 90 miles/hour and like Irish😄, oh sorry... American citizen Joe Biden🏃running 0.75 miles/hour 😄 I love Russia 🇷🇺 Greetings from Lithuania 🇱🇹
@nalsenai but, but Russia still can't beat Ukraine, I wonder why? - also, my neighbours are Lithuania I will make sure to give the Russian loving MoFos some serious headaches.
@@ruzziasht349😂🤡
Except, on lower altitude it won't go as fast or have such range. Today we're talking about either "high and obscenely fast" or "very low and very slow".
😂😂 Did US have faster 🤫😁😁☺️
Salve sicuramente e un arma al a avanguardia molto veloce ma se gli stati uniti e i loro alleati non progetteranno altrettanti sistemi di difesa in grado di superare queste armi tecnologicamente avanzate 😮
if short distance this would be like asniper on high end targets due to short response time detection etc
what about the phalanx guns on ships? are they not automated?
A few years ago at a military parade, the Russians showed their new military ware; Kalibr and Iskandar cruise missiles, and Sarmat ICBM. We had many haters saying it was fake. These same people are saying the same thing. Lol.
This missile is seriously dangerous. As per western experts, it's a formidable weapon that really can't be shot down.
Mach 0.75 😂😂 really my mother walks faster on a bad day😂😂 well done us😂you really topped this one off 😂😂😂😂😂
Tomahawk is not hypersonic, it's another category, same as Russian Kalibr, it is also subsonic
Aircraft carriers have big problems.
Deadly gadget, no doubt.
Bravo Ruussiiaa 🇷🇺 🎖️ 🇷🇺
Simply ...
LIGHT YEARS AHEAD !
UUURRRAA 🙏💖
Avante
Realy I like it they are so powerful
2:17 Zircon
100,000 feet to 130,000 feet
It's just about their toy,have capability to destroy any Target in sea or on Earth 😎
I thought the kinetic energy in of itself was plenty enough to make it several times more destructive than traditional cruise munitions therefore offsetting production cost. But this guy just said this thing carries a weapons payload. I'm confused, does the kinetic energy alone inflict sufficient damage to cause a vessel? Or is the payload needed? Bc if it needs explosives thej isn't this just a r ally fast version of what we have currently? The only real advantage I can see from achieving these hypersonic speeds is that the projectile is virtually immune to any sort of countermeasures currently on the market. I just realized something else. For this new projectile to be deadly to a ship, especially something as large as a carrier. It would need more than hypersonic speed. It would need to be super dense and heavy as hell in order to transfer an immense amount of kinetic energy to destroy it's intended targets, primarily huge warships.
trust me one zicron missile is enough to destroy the biggest amiercan ship.
@@Khalid_Looby gozd enxlind lmao 😃🤣 zicron? amiercan? Where are u from? Alibaba? Wet backs?
@@borislavkrstic6366Where's the link to confirm what you're saying? I'm not calling you a liar, I just actually want to read up on what and where
Ово је само један од озбиљних извора за оно што тврдим. Ради се о Српском добровољцу снајперисти са великим угледом у Русији, који има поуздане информације. Овај коментар пишем на Српском језику који изгледа не бришу за сада.
@@VlD3adly You will never be told in the Western media. This will cause irreparable damage to the reputation and shares of American companies. But the information still leaks. Dig into the archives at "Redacted" . He compiled all the information. On March 2 or 9, in response to planned terrorist attacks in the Belgorod region, the Russians destroyed the NATO headquarters located 120 meters underground and the entire European-made air defense system guarding this object with 6 Kinzhal missiles. 300 soldiers were killed, including 200 high-ranking NATO military.
You can also get confirmation from the Western media. Winning headlines before and complete silence after. And consider our mentality :) It is not customary for us, like the Americans, to praise ourselves and overestimate tactical and technical data. Bad sign :)
the declared speed of the Kinzhal missile is Mach 9. Real up to Mach 25. "Zircon" the same rocket only ship :)
The Hindus want to break the contract for the supply of "Shadow" missiles because they only overcome the air defense system in two cases. If the missiles in the S300 run out or when it is not there :)
From the latest news. The Patriot air defense complex guarding the military airfield near Kiev was destroyed. Shares of the company producing these complexes fell by 10%. This news has not yet been checked.
Yeah, zircons are a game changer for sure. What wasn't mentioned is that a plasma surrounds the missile and absorbs all radar radiation, making it practically undetectable. It's shocking to see how much more advanced Russia's missile technology is than the US missile technology. The US should have been devoting research dollars to this earlier, instead of just letting Russia get so far ahead. If Russia fielded this technology in a war with the US, they could completely take out all US naval ships, leaving us without a navy. It's frightening to think about it.
Very detectable 😂
Do not poke the bear.
But is it real??
I worked in the project. The wepon is worst than they are telling you here, for example is not mach 9 but mach 20, the more speed it has the more autopropulsion it gets.I cant explain how it works here
@@robertokandal you really expect me to believe it.
Or are you really doing sarcasm in here, if the latter then I'm sorry.
@@robertokandal 🤡🤡
What about China’s DF hypersonic missiles and their newly launched hypersonic cruise missiles from submarines ?
All these to end human lives, those already considered weak , none capable of facing none earthly threats ...
where is the missle? you didn't show anything.
It's in balloon
Russian Frigate Admiral Gorshkov, carrying Zircon Hypersonic Missiles entered the Port of Durban, South Africa today
Joint exercises with ships from South Africa & China.
We will build a better world. Bye US no1 needs you anymore
I would like to add something. There is no defense. Циркон is hypersonic and manuverable on the whole trajectory. THE WHOLE trajectory. It is not true that radar will see it in a managable way. It gives only one ping, if you are the target, there is no second ping it is that FAST. The only way of defense is to launch defense missiles and to hope that somehow it comes in the way of the incoming projectile. Just like somebody is shooting a gun on you, and you throw a rock and hope that bullet will hit the rock. It will not.
Laser technology will be developed to counter Mach speeds,but laser tech needs to be effective for longer range!
@@kennethchong2813 there is no defense. Or maybe those diabolical monsters from cnncbsabc and such should thry to squirt lies in hypersonic speed, while zircon is comming in catarzic path of glooory!
Lets say Mach 9 is an exaggeration and the real speed is half that. Mach 4 or 5 still Fvcking fast. 😳
Bet they all have some beam weapons no one talks about! No matter how fast your missile cant beat the speed of light 😅
Chek this state please !
Best thing to do in the 20 seconds after missile detection is, abandon ship.😊
7:33 I love to hear about the Russian Navy - with their famous Flagship Moskva sitting at the bottom of the Black Sea hahahaha
Weston can't stop hypersonic. They don't have hypersonic technology. What a pools. 😂😂😂
I developed a missile that does Mach 11... see, my missile is better. That is about what we're looking at here.
You even don't have made car made by you:))))
It Means nothing.. we intercepted the kinzhal too😊😊😊
I dont think zircon is working as expected
700km ins less than 8 minutes. Hit the SBU hq without an warning my guy
good info 👏👍 Cant wait for the invasion anniversary...
Thats why the US Aircraft Carrier Battle Groups lost it Balls against Russia they are just sitting Ducks in the open sea😂😂😂😂
However is Kinjal not kinzahl
Then China has more fast supersonic missile about Mach 12 😳
I think it must be a gigantic problem to get a lock on those systems.
Simply because at those high speeds you probably get a plasma field around the missile.
For those who do not know: Plasma does not reflect but absorbs radar signals, making it hard if not impossible to detect using radar.
On the infrared spectrum on the other hand it will probably be very visible.
But it is a lot harder to do a long range track on infrared.
Also it think it would be very hard for a missile to fly very fast at the low altitudes a tomahawk can fly. (due to winds, high waves,....)
This is because it would give the missile not enough time to correct it's course to avoid it from crashing into the sea/ground.
ps: I am not claiming to be an expert in this field. Just using the things I remember from the time I studied physics in college.
Как называется ракета которая должна сбить "Циркон"? У капитана корабля всегда найдется время помолиться.
It's called "Oh My God")
Usually everyone remembers its name as soon as they see Cirkon)
What is the proof that it can travel at mach 9 ?? They said it and u accepted it
I don’t know Russian have built hypersonic missal capable of maneuverability
💪🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺👍
And to think Zircon is basically second generation over Kenzhal
😅 KINZHAL is Ballistic missile
Zircon is cruise missile 😅
Браво Русия👏👏🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺👊👊👊
How tf does America not have the same technology?
Too busy with LGBTQ+ BLM rights 😅
Just how powerful is OTAN.
Russia are definitely are the best at making amazing military weapons no doubt about it
Beautiful
This is a game changer. These missiles. can take out the US navy.
Pff russia wouldn't have the balls . They can't even take over ukraine .
Ukraine is tougher than America
@@tall8743 Sure they can. Ukraine and NATO together takes some more time.
@@BigHogg lmao , u really have no idea what kind of people we have in America lol.
@@sowhat8995 America shouldn't give them anything at all . Fight your own war .
Holy sh1t, that's sci-fi material
Thats f*cking some kind of news, USA can't handle...
So whats whats up yankie boys...??
And yet Russia says they do not have imperialistic desires. Why the develop such aggressive missiles?
ONLY ONE WAY TO FIND OUT TRY IT OUT 💀
F- around and find out!!!
Well done Russia, you are the greatest !💪🏻🇷🇺💪🏻
valdbot@troxxa8 Ukraine today shot down a hypersonic missile 2023/05/05 how does that make you feel?
Russian missiles are like a Ford Granada. Big engine, bad breakes and bad road capabilities. 😂 they vant afford this program and dont have the tech
Go 🇷🇺💪✌️👍!
Claudia gp leave
These are just fantasies. 9 times sp of sound ?? The material of the fuselage at that speed don’t exist. Propulsion not possible
Russia is the world new superpower.
you mean the UNDERWORLD new superpower!
second best army in ukraine
@@glennhearn401 second best army in Ukraine is Wagner. Ruski regular troops are third!
It CANT fly at Mach 5 at 300ft
no need to play with Russia
bereh tat russia
All these naval weapons and a country with no navy is sinking Russian ships.
Love u Putin ❤❤ from Gujarat India
It's no good putting an advance hypersonic zircon on a battleship that can be blown out the sea with a drone from the pound shop cos then it would be known as a circus.
THE RUSSIAN HAS A MISSILES WHICH MAKE MACH 12 .
STRANGE THAT YOU DID NOT MANTIONED.
Strange that you did not mention the Avangard missile, which have a speed up to ~25 Mah :)
To see how powerful it is, try to drop it in front of your lawn...😂😂
Uses latest Ukraine toaster oven circuit board for guidance.. 😉😁😂😂
Also uses ukrainian washing machine components for targeting :)
the patriot system becomes obsolete in ukraine because kinjar and Zircon become very fast for him and his missiles very very expensive to fire in the void in addition it can be destroyed which would cost a fortune !!!
Stop the cap 😂
I remember when Putin said it the west opposed him
URAAAA 😁
It is what it is good iob putin