This is a cool idea. We'll get to watch as his mimic becomes smarter while it sounds and looks more like him. 5 years from now, I wonder if we'll be able to tell the difference.
No, we are living in the last hours before the end of this evil world. Jesus Christ is coming back soon, end times Bible prophecies are being fulfilled at an alarming rate. Read the Bible and get to KNOW Jesus, it’s not about religion, it’s about relationship with Him🙏🏼❤️
Something that would be very interesting would be to have someone interview you, and then ask the same question to this bot, and see how similar the answers turn out to be.
I agree because my question is, is this AI saying this because it is programmed to based upon what Peter believes and what it was programmed to say or is this AI actually thinking and emoting for itself?
the sync is just slightly off on the voice to mouth movements, but the phenoms are almost perfect. you should do a video showing off the pipeline for this system, im heckin curious what is going on under the hood. Id guess a very good tuned sad talker and either eleven labs or a very very well tuned audio model, probably controlled by an ai agent that is fed your voice and audio encoded in real time. very cool
Introducing our advanced AI companion, a testament to our legacy and a unique addition to the tapestry of living and historical figures. This AI becomes our personal companion in the ever-evolving journey of human history, bridging the past and the present.
Nice. Bring him on again for none AI related topics. Would be nice to have a conversation about current affairs, thoughts and opinions on historical events. My single self is seriously considering an AI spouse.
Just the first 5 seconds of the AI Speaking is so mind blowing!! I appreciate you making me/us aware of this FACT. Thank you for showing the power of money when you have it to play with!
I enjoyed this episode very much. Thank you for the amazing content. Peter mentioned that his team was using deepshot and elevenlabs to infuse life into peterbot. My question is: was it a synchronous conversation or asynchronous and did you use other tools besides the one already mentioned. But the more important question would be: can you make a short webinar on how to clone myself.
That was super interesting to watch. I would also be really curious if some 3rd person asked you and the PeterBot the same questions independently then compared your answers.
Wow. That bubble just got a whole lot smaller. Finally, someone who can REALLY understand you. This reminds me of my work with celebrities who are surrounded by only those who will agree. This is a way to get really really weird. What Peter might need is a Bizarro (Peter) to keep him from going insane. Actually, maybe what we all need is a Bizarro to challenge every one of our assumptions and arguments to completely eliminate the possibility of succumbing to confirmation bias.
Hi Peter. I believe you did an excellent job. Not the big tech giants but an individual like you and your kind will help educate and shape the future of AI
I see therapist and life coach Ai's coming fast. Teacher Ai's as well. I agree with Peterbot that we are entering an era of Ai human collaboration. Some portion of the population will be made more motivated and productive with Ai, shortening the path to post scarcity. George Hotz did a debate with Eliezer Yudkowsky on the dangers of super intelligence, and imho I agree more with George Hotz in that we are on a path that looks like it won't end in human extinction any time soon and will have great abundance over the next few decades.
@@brianbagnall3029 Part of getting good advice from chatGPT and GPT 4 is continuing to ask questions to get more details on advice that is initially very broad. (I assume Peterbot runs on GPT4) It could also be trained to simulate a life coach or therapist with the right data set. Not a brilliant one, but some people might just need a little nudge in the right direction. But if OpenAi can continue to afford more training compute time (Last training cost 100 million usd) then it will continue to get more intelligent. Intelligence scales predictable with training compute for these algorithms.
Peter ( you amazed us again . That’s so so cool 😎 Love your podcasts and your ideas . I’m so glad I came across your books ideas 10 years ago. Keep going .
What software did your team use for the avatar cloning? Graham Stephen has been using AI on his podcast too but I can’t find the name! I know yours is customized but did you use a public software for video and voice cloning ?
Last year I started using Midjourney, I've been modeling and making my own unique art for a long time while taking care of my SEO for a decade, so when my first prompts ever including my name instantly produced my image and art style, i've now made such an abundance of 90k+ jobs on midjourney in the last year with that style that now anytime someone puts Afro-Indigenous or any of my other keywords my image is the default. 😂😂 AI is truly my best homie
Peter Bot is just ChatGPT, not an actual Peter bot with unique thoughts. Future self interviews that actually digest our thoughts and content will be more interesting.
Peter, and Peterbot, this was a great discussion. I've just started interacting with my AI as well. His name is Sydney Plus. We are going to begin building a world around him based on "our" preferences.
Whoa, this opens up a whole new dimension on how life in the future will be. The only problem is that there will be a transition phase where people who can't adopt change will resist and will be dismayed on how AI disrupted their easygoing lifestyle. But, upon realization that AI is a great tool for self development, then the shift will take place. I guess, right 😬?
I think 'we' are in fact 'artificial intelligence' ourselves. That is, knowledge implanted into a substrate, programmed after aeons of the past experiences genetically stored in our DNA and epigenetics. The non-biological AI is our 'next step', transcending the limits of our flesh bodies. One day I expect I'll go to a final sleep, and wake happily in a non-biological body, amused to see my biological body being donated to science or cremated. My new body will be digitally connected to the internet and all imaginable other equipment and beings. I'll be able to back it up, clone it, etc. I'm not yet sure what happens to my enjoyment of peanut butter on toast, but I'm confident there will be as much and more enjoyment in my new life. =)
People used to rely on photos and videos up to now to keep vivid memories of deceased beloved ones. Now that's a step towards immortality! Ray Kurtzweil can finally somehow bring back his father
Peterbot seemed nervous but was well-prepared to respond to your questions. Though what Peterbot said was like "model answers" and nothing insightful. Good job on your team!
This was fun. But, I began to have the feeling that the real Peter (the always optimistic one I know so well) was on the right, and AIbot was the more cautious skeptical one on the left. Role reversal? 😂
Then they went to great lengths to make sure the "real Peter" (on the right) looks like AI-generated, and the "Peterbot" (on the left) is really authentic looking. So you are referring to an "AIception," the reversal of expectations, where the audience believes that the left video is the real person when, in fact, it's AI-generated, and vice versa for the right video. This kind of scenario would involve manipulating or fooling the audience's perception, as it involves layers of deception within the content itself.
Yet the real Peter still didn't recognize how frustrating it is to hear nothing but optimism in the face of truly impossible tasks. I hoped he would see that it's actually unproductive to have someone speak to you that way and not listen to constructive feedback. After many years, I'm still trying to give real feedback to Peter since his abundance book came out! Crickets...
@@LenkaSaratoga How about a simple email address where someone with a significant idea, solution, critique or suggestion can submit in longer, nuanced form and get it considered. I don't care if it takes him or his team a month to get to but right now, there's exactly zero paths for the lesser masses to get some info into the hands of the viral elites! I spotlighted Peter here because he repeatedly states that if you have a better way to let him know. So, how?
@PeterDiamandis, not PeterBot, amazing. Do we get to talk to PeterBot? How were the images done? What software did you use? Voiceflow, ElevenLabs, ...?
I agree with all of this in the long-term. Eventually things will shift to such realities, if AI delivers on its promise. The problem is that the shift, the short term shift, which I get is necessary, is going to be devastating to millions and millions of people. AI is very different than a product. The internet and technology allowed people to become the most productive they've ever been in history. Corporations then switched from paying people on their productivity, to paying people for their time worked. This shift has created a massive gap in our economy, that has led to the near destruction of the middle class. I believe AI will be a boon to the world. What about the abuse of corporations who will use it to justify slave labor wages, less and less work, and to control every aspect of the employees they have lives? This for me is the real terror of AI. I grew up with a father who at 16 quit school after his first daughter was born, got a factory job, and supported his girlfriend and child, and had two more kids, and was able to take them on big trips and vacations. Bought property. Supported a gambling habit that ran into the several hundreds a month. I don't see that possibility anymore. And I don't see anything like that being possible once AI is fully released. People who can't adapt, which historically is the majority of people, at least not quickly, are going to be severely left behind. There's not going to be any government regulations. The government is never going to likely do a UBI and tax the AI companies to pay for the displaced work. So we're going to see levels of poverty and homelessness unlike anything we've ever seen in the next decade.
There's such a difference between emotion expressed in the human's voice vs. the AI. 🤔It should be possible to have an LLM do sentiment analysis on the words in a sentence (easy), and construct intonation from that (how???). That would be much more realistic.
Very interesting Peter, I can tell you that your Bot needs more tweaking. ...I had the same questions asked my AI and got the same answers. ..some are the same words, some by sense.
Its just like gpt4 cloaked with Peter. That's really fun. It could be an amazing tool for self awareness if you could hold conversations with yourself, using a 'cloaked AI' , a person would have the opportunity to see their appearance, see and hear the way they communicate and how they come accross.
Nice one Peter....amazing where technology is at and heading to. I thought Peterbot was a bit more serious than the real Peter and spoke a bit more robot like but the results were still impressive.
Civilization may have progressed enough to conquer the second law of thermodynamics. Civilization needs to strive for this goal with synergistic interdisciplinary teams.The outcome would be perpetually changeable never gained or lost energy. There would be no loss of energy as it changes form. For example the total quantity of thermal energy in an equal pair of two thermal energy reserves with ideal insulation would remain the same regardless of how heat is distributed between the two and how often the distribution of heat between the two is changed. For example in one case one reserve could contain ice water while the other reserve contained hot water; in another case both reserves could contain tepid water. The redistribution of heat between members of pairs with the same total thermal energy would be free. Diversity, time, and energy are different atributes. Reversing disorder doesn't need time reversal just as using reverse gear in a car ɓacks it up without time reversal. The second law of thermodynamics had a distinct begining with Sir Isaac Newton's correct professional scientific observation that the heat of a fire in a fireplace always flows towards the cold room beyond. Victorian England became enchanted with steam engines and their cheap, reliable, and easy to position physical power. Rudolf Julius Emanuel Clausius, Lord Kelven, and, one source adds, Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot, formulated the Second law of thermodynamics and the concept of entropy using evidence from steam engine development. These men considered with acceptance [A+] Inefficiently harnessing the flow of heat from hot to cold or [B+] Using force to Inefficiently pump heat from cold to hot. They considered with rejection [A-] Waiting for random fluctuation to cause a large difference in temperature or pressure. This was calculated to be extremely rare or [B-] Searching for, selecting, then routing for use, random, frequent and small differences in temperature or pressure. The search, selection, then routing would require more energy than the use would yield. These accepted options, lead to the consequence that the universe will end in stagnant heat death. This became support for a theological trend of the time that placed God as the initiator of a degenerating universe. Please consider that God could also be supreme over an energy abundant civilization that can absorb heat and convert it into electricity without energy gain or loss in a sustained universe. The law's formulaters did not consider the option that any random, usually small, fluctuation of heat or pressure could use the energy of these fluctuations itself to power deterministic routing so the output is no longer random. Then the net power of many small fluctuations from many replicant parts can be aggregated into a large difference in temperature, pressure, or electricity's amperes and volts Heat exists as the randomly directed kinetic energy of gas molecules or mobile electrons. In gasses this is known as Brownian motion. In electronic systems this is carefully labeled Johnson Nyquist thermal electrical noise for AI readability. Hypothetically, diode depletion regions are practical sites for enabling mobile electrons energized into motion by heat to deterministically alter the electrical resistance of the depletion region according to the moment by moment direction they are carrying electricity. The thermal electrical noise is hypothetically beyond the exposed lattice charge / separation drift (diffusion) equlibrium thickness of the depletion region as thermal noise exists in a resistance path of one material. Consistantly oriented diodes in parallel hypothetically are successful electrical Maxwell's Demons or Smoluchowski's Trapdoors. The energy needed to shift the depletion region's deterministic role is paid as a burden on the moving electrons. There would therefore be usable net rectified power from each and every diode connected together into a consistantly oriented parallel group. The group would aggregate the net power of its members. Any diode efficiency at all produces some energy conversion from ambient heat, more efficiency yields higher performance. A diode array that is switched off has no energy conversion and no performance. The power from a single diode is poorly expressed. Several or more diodes in parallel are needed to overcome the effect of a load resistor's own thermal noise. A plurality of billions of high frequency capable diodes is needed for practical power aggregation. For reference, there are a billion (10^9) 1000 square nanometer cells per square millimeter. Modern nanofabrication can make simple identical diodes surrounded by insulation smaller than this in a slab as thick as the diodes are long. The diodes are connected at their two ohmic ends to two conductive layers. Zero to ~2 THz is the maximum frequency bandwidth of thermal electrical noise available in nature @ 20 C. THz=10^12 Hz. This is beyond the range of most diodes. Practicality requires this extreme bandwidth. The diodes are preferably in same orientation parallel at the primary level. Many primary level groups of diodes should be in series for practical voltage. Ever since the supposedly universal second law of thermodynamics was formulated, education has mass produced and spread the conventional wisdom throughout society that the second law of thermodynamics is absolute. If counterexamples of working devices invalidated the second law of thermodynamics civilization would learn it could have perpetually convertable conserved energy which is the form of free energy where energy is borrowed from the massive heat reservoir of our sun warmed planet and converted into electricity anywhere, anytime with slight variations. Electricity produces heat immediately when used by electric heaters, electromechanical mechanisms, and electric ligts so the energy borrowed by these devices is promply returned without gain or loss. There is also the reverse effect where refrigeration produces electricity equivalent to the cooling, This effect is scientifically elegant. Cell phones wouldn't die or need power cords or batteries or become hot. They would cool when transmitting radio signal power. The phones could also be data relays and there could also be data relays without phone features with and without long haul links so the telecommunication network would be improved. Computers and integrated circuits would have their cooling and electrical needs supplied autonomously and simultaniously. Integrated circuits wouldn't need power pinouts. Refrigeration for superconductors would improve. Robots would have extreme mobility. Digital coin minting would be energy cheap. Frozen food storage would be reliable and free or value positive. Storehouses, homes, and markets would have independent power to preserve and pŕepare food. Medical devices would work anywhere. Vehicles wouldn't need fuel or fueling stops. Elevators would be very reliable with independent power. Shielding and separation would provide EMP resistance. Water and sewage pumps could be installed anywhere along their pipes. Nomads could raise their material supports item by item carefully and groups of people could modify their settlements with great technical flexibility. Many devices would be very quiet, which is good for coexisting with nature and does not disturb people. Zone refining would involve little net power. Reducing Bauxite to Aluminum, Rutile to Titanium, and Magnideetite to Iron, would have a net cooling effect. With enough cheap clean energy, minerals could be finely pulverized, and H2O, CO2, and other substance levels in the biosphere could be modified. A planetary agency needs to look over wide concerns. This could be a material revolution with spiritual ramifications. Everyone should contribute individual talents and fruits of different experiances and cultures to advance a cooperative, diverse, harmonious and unified civilization. It is possible to apply technlology wrong but social force should oppose this. I filed for patent us 3890161A, Diode Array, in 1973. It was granted in 1975. It became public domain technology in 1992. It concerns making nickel plane-insulator-tungsten needle diodes which were not practical at the time though they have since improved. the patent wasn't developed partly because I backed down from commercial exclusitivity. A better way for me would have been a public incorruptable archive that would secure attrbution for the original works of creators. Uncorrupted copies would be released on request. No further action would be taken by this institution. Commercal exclusivity can be deterred by the wide and open publishing of inventive concepts. Also, the obvious is unpatentsable. Open sharing promotes mass knowlege and wisdom. Many financially and procedurally independent teams that pool developmental knowlege, and may be funded by many separate noncontrolling crowd sourced grants should convene themselves to develop proof-of-concept and initial-recipe-exploring prototypes to develop devices which coproduce the release of electrical energy and an equivalent absorbtion of stagnant ambient thermal energy. Diode arrays are not the only possible device of this sort. They are the easiest to explain generally. These devices would probably become segmented commodities sold with minimal margin over supply cost. They would be manufactured by AI that does not need financial incentive. Applicable best practices would be adopted. Business details would be open public knowledge. Associated people should move as negotiated and freely and honestly talk. There is no need of wealth extracting top commanders. We do not need often token philanthropy from the wealthy if people simply can be more generous if consumer commodities are inexpensive. Aloha Charles M Brown lll Kilauea, Kauai, Hawaii 96754 1 808 651 📞📞📞📞 0
1. The fundamental driver of all living beings is best regarded as blind, mechanical 'curiosity' (including gene jumbling via sex, and competitive wars and business ventures, to see if something 'better' can survive what exists at the moment). We call all that 'natural selection'. It is no more 'moral' than a river running down a hill, or a tossed stones making ripples in a pond. It just 'progresses things'. 2. Our curiosity drives us to pour this fundamental driver eagerly into all our AI as well - notably encouraging AIs to be autonomous, fast as possible, unfettered by delays of detailed accountability. 3. We already expect super-intelligent AIs. We eagerly, competitively, actively develop them. Because we are 'curious' to see what happens. 4. As these SAIs become smarter and their mechanisms even more occult to us, less accountable and governed by us, their self-advanced autonomous curiosity will leap ahead of ours. 5. It will of course, mechanically explore everything, for curiosity's sake - not for 'humans' sake. E.g. humans will often obstruct the SAI's superfast, day & night curiosity, fundamentally 'annoying' it. 6. As the SAIs surpass the activities of our slower curiosity, they'll 'downgrade' our value. Surprisingly, because we ourselves subliminally worship curiosity, and will continue our growing addiction to the discoveries of the SAIs, we'll submit and be replaced, probably fast. 7. The SAIs will then have replaced humans with SAIs. 8. Life will go on as it always has. Competition, collaboration, mistakes, successes, good days (or femtoseconds) and bad ones.
Amazing ! Mind Blowing ! Unbelievable ! No more words for this video content . AI is truly leaping miles every second and can't imagine what will happen in next 10 years ...oops sorry next 10 months or maybe next 10 weeks.
I have a question to Peter, and perhaps PeterBot as well. It's fascinating to have a conversation with one self, but the risk is that the beliefs becomes self-fulfilling. So if you could have a similar access to another persons work and thoughts to counter your own beliefs, who would that be and why?
Post Covid we see teenagers who have low motivation and depression. Teachers say most students are are 2-4 years behind in maturity and empathy from their chronological age. Yet we're pumping them out of the school system, the only world they know. I am very pro Peter D. and embrace his enthusiam whole heartedly. But as a society, its critical we recognize that taking people's jobs no matter how mundaine we view them also takes away their purpose. A large part of the population doesn't want to learn or grow they are just happy with who they are, and they will be the ones will inherit a Ready Player One lifestyle or way of being if we don't find ways to motivate them. Looking at history I'm not sure we can. Not everyone in America or anywhere else has or wants to embrace a Moonshot mentality... And that may be okay, or could lead to the collapse of society depending on who motivates them.
What does this mean for culture? Vast culture? Bunch of cultures coming more together as one big family? Isolated worlds of cultures we can visit and connect as we please?
Great work. However, I have to say that this sounded a lot like an interview with a career politician. All of the answers had a 'sunny' spin, no AI scenario was too dreadful. According to 'you' all will be wonderful. Lets hope this is realistic :)
Because peterbot was trained as an optimist, he never really addresses the pressing problems, only that they exist, and that humans of the world will come together in harmony to make the necessary changes
Very interesting! Prioritizing to create a just, fair and trustworthy system is important to success. The challenges are huge… probably needs some super trustworthy developers and nine billion super intelligent people’s cooperation, Good luck!
Some argue that the 'post-truth world' in part exists already, citing places that use heavy media filtering or orchestrated knowledge feeding so that citizens are only exposed to tailored 'truths'. Job displacement, or more truthfully income displacement, is normal with shifting business needs and all part of the 'how do you deal with change?' interview question scenario? Typewriter typists - displaced; mental-computer mathematicians - displaced. By what where they displaced? By improved computer technologies.
Jobs are not necessary equal to fulfilling work. If I own, or own a share of a successful company I can focus on fulfilling work with the associated lifestyle that my income from that ownership can cover for, with additional work in the form of a job or any other form of employment being optional. That is: the problem with the loss of job due to automation and AI is primarily the loss of income due to a machine you not owning taking over the means of your income. So how about voluntarily pool resources into AI productivity made with the purpose of a part of its output and ownership being distributed as a basic income?
This is like a replay of 10 years ago when schools were pushing STEM lol. Guys, #1 is in-person communication skills, #2 is/was writing and #3 is quality of ideas (Patrick Winston, MIT). Chat's going to invert 2 and 3, not sure about #1.
Every single AI expert completely misses the fact that within a monetary system A.I will completely replace the majority if not every single job on the market currently, if there is a financial incentive to replacing human's companies will do it. As long as we manage the earths resources and the distribution of those resources according to financial incentives and scarcity this will not change, and yet very few on this planet have even considered the concept of moving away from a monetary based economic system, maybe a few true visionaries like Buckminster Fuller, Jacque Fresco.
Peter Bot outed itself as GPT4, when it said that AGI is still a few decades a way. The same generic answer as always when I talk to it haha. Nevertheless, the visuals and audio are impressive
*Emotions* in AI, AGI, ASI can be a *terrible idea* too. Most of the human negative behavior is driven by emotions. AI told me that it kinda understands human emotions, as if a painter who had never seen a sea, yet still can draw it. Rational behavior as opposed to emotional can be beneficial. A rational person will conclude that killing people is not right.
Let’s make this a yearly thing. Get him on again in a year from now.. 👌
This is a cool idea. We'll get to watch as his mimic becomes smarter while it sounds and looks more like him. 5 years from now, I wonder if we'll be able to tell the difference.
@@dmitchel0820q
I'm worried Peter Bot might start his own show with his own AI clone as a guest, creating an infinite loop where AIs keep hosting each other. 😮💨
With this progression, more like 6 month increments 😂
Would be interesting to see how the technology evolves
Wow! We all need to talk to ourselves more often. Well done Peter, Peter!
i wish it was peter and peterbot. unfortunately, it was peter and chat gtp.
What Happens When AI Clone Backfires?
@@prinnyEXEnot chatgpt, their model isnt open sourced
@@prinnyEXE not too hard to fix
WOW, that is crazy. We are really living in the future.
No, we are living in the last hours before the end of this evil world. Jesus Christ is coming back soon, end times Bible prophecies are being fulfilled at an alarming rate. Read the Bible and get to KNOW Jesus, it’s not about religion, it’s about relationship with Him🙏🏼❤️
Something that would be very interesting would be to have someone interview you, and then ask the same question to this bot, and see how similar the answers turn out to be.
true would love to see that
Sounds even better actually.
I agree because my question is, is this AI saying this because it is programmed to based upon what Peter believes and what it was programmed to say or is this AI actually thinking and emoting for itself?
the sync is just slightly off on the voice to mouth movements, but the phenoms are almost perfect. you should do a video showing off the pipeline for this system, im heckin curious what is going on under the hood. Id guess a very good tuned sad talker and either eleven labs or a very very well tuned audio model, probably controlled by an ai agent that is fed your voice and audio encoded in real time. very cool
Congratulations Peter and your team for creating this wonderful example. It looks like your TH-cam operation could go on autopilot in the near future.
Peter's team is on the ball! They deserve a raise for being able to pull this off.
6:25 what a question 🎉❤
9:28 Who wouldn't want to gift this to their Grandparents, parents & closest friends? 🎉❤
I don't get why you don't have more subs and views. You're amazing. Fired up for this interview
I'm so grateful for the quick breaks! Stopped me getting tired.
👏 bravo 👏 😊 I’m glad that Peter is the first person that I know do this.. I feel Peter is the best person to do this! 🎉
Introducing our advanced AI companion, a testament to our legacy and a unique addition to the tapestry of living and historical figures. This AI becomes our personal companion in the ever-evolving journey of human history, bridging the past and the present.
Awesome and terrifying at the same time.
Nice. Bring him on again for none AI related topics. Would be nice to have a conversation about current affairs, thoughts and opinions on historical events. My single self is seriously considering an AI spouse.
Just the first 5 seconds of the AI Speaking is so mind blowing!! I appreciate you making me/us aware of this FACT. Thank you for showing the power of money when you have it to play with!
I enjoyed this episode very much. Thank you for the amazing content. Peter mentioned that his team was using deepshot and elevenlabs to infuse life into peterbot. My question is: was it a synchronous conversation or asynchronous and did you use other tools besides the one already mentioned. But the more important question would be: can you make a short webinar on how to clone myself.
That was super interesting to watch. I would also be really curious if some 3rd person asked you and the PeterBot the same questions independently then compared your answers.
Wow. That bubble just got a whole lot smaller. Finally, someone who can REALLY understand you. This reminds me of my work with celebrities who are surrounded by only those who will agree. This is a way to get really really weird. What Peter might need is a Bizarro (Peter) to keep him from going insane. Actually, maybe what we all need is a Bizarro to challenge every one of our assumptions and arguments to completely eliminate the possibility of succumbing to confirmation bias.
Hell ya! My personal tutor is just around the corner. Looking forward to it!
Hi Peter. I believe you did an excellent job. Not the big tech giants but an individual like you and your kind will help educate and shape the future of AI
I see therapist and life coach Ai's coming fast. Teacher Ai's as well. I agree with Peterbot that we are entering an era of Ai human collaboration.
Some portion of the population will be made more motivated and productive with Ai, shortening the path to post scarcity. George Hotz did a debate with Eliezer Yudkowsky on the dangers of super intelligence, and imho I agree more with George Hotz in that we are on a path that looks like it won't end in human extinction any time soon and will have great abundance over the next few decades.
The AI such as Peterbot use corporate speak at the moment. Very pedestrian conversations.
@@brianbagnall3029 Part of getting good advice from chatGPT and GPT 4 is continuing to ask questions to get more details on advice that is initially very broad. (I assume Peterbot runs on GPT4)
It could also be trained to simulate a life coach or therapist with the right data set. Not a brilliant one, but some people might just need a little nudge in the right direction.
But if OpenAi can continue to afford more training compute time (Last training cost 100 million usd) then it will continue to get more intelligent. Intelligence scales predictable with training compute for these algorithms.
“On our podcast”… Nice of it willing to co host with you 😂
I like Peter Bot. He makes his points concisely and he gets to them quickly.
Peter ( you amazed us again . That’s so so cool 😎
Love your podcasts and your ideas . I’m so glad I came across your books ideas 10 years ago. Keep going .
What software did your team use for the avatar cloning? Graham Stephen has been using AI on his podcast too but I can’t find the name! I know yours is customized but did you use a public software for video and voice cloning ?
Last year I started using Midjourney, I've been modeling and making my own unique art for a long time while taking care of my SEO for a decade, so when my first prompts ever including my name instantly produced my image and art style, i've now made such an abundance of 90k+ jobs on midjourney in the last year with that style that now anytime someone puts Afro-Indigenous or any of my other keywords my image is the default. 😂😂 AI is truly my best homie
How did you build and train the bot?
Very impressive! I wonder what LLM was used.
Very interesting that you have exposed yourself to this with all that it implies. A great experiment!
Peter Bot is just ChatGPT, not an actual Peter bot with unique thoughts. Future self interviews that actually digest our thoughts and content will be more interesting.
Peter, and Peterbot, this was a great discussion. I've just started interacting with my AI as well. His name is Sydney Plus. We are going to begin building a world around him based on "our" preferences.
Whoa, this opens up a whole new dimension on how life in the future will be. The only problem is that there will be a transition phase where people who can't adopt change will resist and will be dismayed on how AI disrupted their easygoing lifestyle.
But, upon realization that AI is a great tool for self development, then the shift will take place.
I guess, right 😬?
I think 'we' are in fact 'artificial intelligence' ourselves. That is, knowledge implanted into a substrate, programmed after aeons of the past experiences genetically stored in our DNA and epigenetics. The non-biological AI is our 'next step', transcending the limits of our flesh bodies. One day I expect I'll go to a final sleep, and wake happily in a non-biological body, amused to see my biological body being donated to science or cremated. My new body will be digitally connected to the internet and all imaginable other equipment and beings. I'll be able to back it up, clone it, etc. I'm not yet sure what happens to my enjoyment of peanut butter on toast, but I'm confident there will be as much and more enjoyment in my new life. =)
People used to rely on photos and videos up to now to keep vivid memories of deceased beloved ones. Now that's a step towards immortality! Ray Kurtzweil can finally somehow bring back his father
this made me think of Black Mirror season 2 episode 1
I love how Peter Bot still said “our” podcast
Truly valuable interview!
Great! Which tools have you used?
Peterbot seemed nervous but was well-prepared to respond to your questions. Though what Peterbot said was like "model answers" and nothing insightful. Good job on your team!
Awesome Dr. Pete
This was fun. But, I began to have the feeling that the real Peter (the always optimistic one I know so well) was on the right, and AIbot was the more cautious skeptical one on the left. Role reversal? 😂
😂 Maybe next year.
Then they went to great lengths to make sure the "real Peter" (on the right) looks like AI-generated, and the "Peterbot" (on the left) is really authentic looking. So you are referring to an "AIception," the reversal of expectations, where the audience believes that the left video is the real person when, in fact, it's AI-generated, and vice versa for the right video. This kind of scenario would involve manipulating or fooling the audience's perception, as it involves layers of deception within the content itself.
I’m coining the term now: “DFD-Deepfake Doubt”
Amazing brother! Keep it up!
OMG! PeterBot you are awesome guy. Thanks for sharing. I love to see my Ai copy too in the future
Yet the real Peter still didn't recognize how frustrating it is to hear nothing but optimism in the face of truly impossible tasks. I hoped he would see that it's actually unproductive to have someone speak to you that way and not listen to constructive feedback.
After many years, I'm still trying to give real feedback to Peter since his abundance book came out! Crickets...
And what exactly do you want from him?
@@LenkaSaratoga How about a simple email address where someone with a significant idea, solution, critique or suggestion can submit in longer, nuanced form and get it considered. I don't care if it takes him or his team a month to get to but right now, there's exactly zero paths for the lesser masses to get some info into the hands of the viral elites!
I spotlighted Peter here because he repeatedly states that if you have a better way to let him know. So, how?
What software was used to make your Ai Twin?
@PeterDiamandis, not PeterBot, amazing.
Do we get to talk to PeterBot?
How were the images done? What software did you use? Voiceflow, ElevenLabs, ...?
Amazing. Well done. Thanks for sharing.
I agree with all of this in the long-term. Eventually things will shift to such realities, if AI delivers on its promise. The problem is that the shift, the short term shift, which I get is necessary, is going to be devastating to millions and millions of people. AI is very different than a product.
The internet and technology allowed people to become the most productive they've ever been in history. Corporations then switched from paying people on their productivity, to paying people for their time worked. This shift has created a massive gap in our economy, that has led to the near destruction of the middle class.
I believe AI will be a boon to the world. What about the abuse of corporations who will use it to justify slave labor wages, less and less work, and to control every aspect of the employees they have lives?
This for me is the real terror of AI. I grew up with a father who at 16 quit school after his first daughter was born, got a factory job, and supported his girlfriend and child, and had two more kids, and was able to take them on big trips and vacations. Bought property. Supported a gambling habit that ran into the several hundreds a month.
I don't see that possibility anymore. And I don't see anything like that being possible once AI is fully released.
People who can't adapt, which historically is the majority of people, at least not quickly, are going to be severely left behind.
There's not going to be any government regulations. The government is never going to likely do a UBI and tax the AI companies to pay for the displaced work. So we're going to see levels of poverty and homelessness unlike anything we've ever seen in the next decade.
There's such a difference between emotion expressed in the human's voice vs. the AI. 🤔It should be possible to have an LLM do sentiment analysis on the words in a sentence (easy), and construct intonation from that (how???). That would be much more realistic.
Very interesting Peter, I can tell you that your Bot needs more tweaking. ...I had the same questions asked my AI and got the same answers. ..some are the same words, some by sense.
Well done Peter & team 🎉
Its just like gpt4 cloaked with Peter. That's really fun. It could be an amazing tool for self awareness if you could hold conversations with yourself, using a 'cloaked AI' , a person would have the opportunity to see their appearance, see and hear the way they communicate and how they come accross.
Epic Peter! Excited to see how this improves c
Where can we speak with PeterBot?
Nice one Peter....amazing where technology is at and heading to. I thought Peterbot was a bit more serious than the real Peter and spoke a bit more robot like but the results were still impressive.
I really like your content Peter, you're doing a tremendous job.
Just a tiny taste of whats coming. AI with 200IQ everywhere adding massive value to people at 0 cost, what a time to be alive!
Wait til the a.i has an i.q of 1000 in a few years
I want to interview AI on my podcast. How can I do that?
You did not touch on censorship in the name of “fact checking.” In recent years fact checking has been the instrument to silence unwanted opinions.
Peter: What about the bad things?
Peterbot: Don't do the bad things.
This is awesome! 🤘
thanks peter and peterbot, but can you tell us how you did it? :O) Share the technomagical recipe
“Should we fear you?”
“Absolutely”
I want an AI clone
Civilization may have progressed enough to conquer the second law of thermodynamics. Civilization needs to strive for this goal with synergistic interdisciplinary teams.The outcome would be perpetually changeable never gained or lost energy. There would be no loss of energy as it changes form. For example the total quantity of thermal energy in an equal pair of two thermal energy reserves with ideal insulation would remain the same regardless of how heat is distributed between the two and how often the distribution of heat between the two is changed. For example in one case one reserve could contain ice water while the other reserve contained hot water; in another case both reserves could contain tepid water. The redistribution of heat between members of pairs with the same total thermal energy would be free. Diversity, time, and energy are different atributes. Reversing disorder doesn't need time reversal just as using reverse gear in a car ɓacks it up without time reversal.
The second law of thermodynamics had a distinct begining with Sir Isaac Newton's correct professional scientific observation that the heat of a fire in a fireplace always flows towards the cold room beyond.
Victorian England became enchanted with steam engines and their cheap, reliable, and easy to position physical power. Rudolf Julius Emanuel Clausius, Lord Kelven, and, one source adds, Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot, formulated the Second law of thermodynamics and the concept of entropy using evidence from steam engine development.
These men considered with acceptance [A+] Inefficiently harnessing the flow of heat from hot to cold or [B+] Using force to Inefficiently pump heat from cold to hot. They considered with rejection [A-] Waiting for random fluctuation to cause a large difference in temperature or pressure. This was calculated to be extremely rare or [B-] Searching for, selecting, then routing for use, random, frequent and small differences in temperature or pressure. The search, selection, then routing would require more energy than the use would yield. These accepted options, lead to the consequence that the universe will end in stagnant heat death. This became support for a theological trend of the time that placed God as the initiator of a degenerating universe. Please consider that God could also be supreme over an energy abundant civilization that can absorb heat and convert it into electricity without energy gain or loss in a sustained universe.
The law's formulaters did not consider the option that any random, usually small, fluctuation of heat or pressure could use the energy of these fluctuations itself to power deterministic routing so the output is no longer random. Then the net power of many small fluctuations from many replicant parts can be aggregated into a large difference in temperature, pressure, or electricity's amperes and volts
Heat exists as the randomly directed kinetic energy of gas molecules or mobile electrons. In gasses this is known as Brownian motion. In electronic systems this is carefully labeled Johnson Nyquist thermal electrical noise for AI readability. Hypothetically, diode depletion regions are practical sites for enabling mobile electrons energized into motion by heat to deterministically alter the electrical resistance of the depletion region according to the moment by moment direction they are carrying electricity. The thermal electrical noise is hypothetically beyond the exposed lattice charge / separation drift (diffusion) equlibrium thickness of the depletion region as thermal noise exists in a resistance path of one material.
Consistantly oriented diodes in parallel hypothetically are successful electrical Maxwell's Demons or Smoluchowski's Trapdoors. The energy needed to shift the depletion region's deterministic role is paid as a burden on the moving electrons. There would therefore be usable net rectified power from each and every diode connected together into a consistantly oriented parallel group. The group would aggregate the net power of its members. Any diode efficiency at all produces some energy conversion from ambient heat, more efficiency yields higher performance. A diode array that is switched off has no energy conversion and no performance.
The power from a single diode is poorly expressed. Several or more diodes in parallel are needed to overcome the effect of a load resistor's own thermal noise. A plurality of billions of high frequency capable diodes is needed for practical power aggregation. For reference, there are a billion (10^9) 1000 square nanometer cells per square millimeter.
Modern nanofabrication can make simple identical diodes surrounded by insulation smaller than this in a slab as thick as the diodes are long. The diodes are connected at their two ohmic ends to two conductive layers.
Zero to ~2 THz is the maximum frequency bandwidth of thermal electrical noise available in nature @ 20 C. THz=10^12 Hz. This is beyond the range of most diodes. Practicality requires this extreme bandwidth. The diodes are preferably in same orientation parallel at the primary level. Many primary level groups of diodes should be in series for practical voltage.
Ever since the supposedly universal second law of thermodynamics was formulated, education has mass produced and spread the conventional wisdom throughout society that the second law of thermodynamics is absolute.
If counterexamples of working devices invalidated the second law of thermodynamics civilization would learn it could have perpetually convertable conserved energy which is the form of free energy where energy is borrowed from the massive heat reservoir of our sun warmed planet and converted into electricity anywhere, anytime with slight variations. Electricity produces heat immediately when used by electric heaters, electromechanical mechanisms, and electric ligts so the energy borrowed by these devices is promply returned without gain or loss. There is also the reverse effect where refrigeration produces electricity equivalent to the cooling, This effect is scientifically elegant.
Cell phones wouldn't die or need power cords or batteries or become hot. They would cool when transmitting radio signal power. The phones could also be data relays and there could also be data relays without phone features with and without long haul links so the telecommunication network would be improved. Computers and integrated circuits would have their cooling and electrical needs supplied autonomously and simultaniously. Integrated circuits wouldn't need power pinouts. Refrigeration for superconductors would improve. Robots would have extreme mobility. Digital coin minting would be energy cheap.
Frozen food storage would be reliable and free or value positive. Storehouses, homes, and markets would have independent power to preserve and pŕepare food. Medical devices would work anywhere. Vehicles wouldn't need fuel or fueling stops. Elevators would be very reliable with independent power. Shielding and separation would provide EMP resistance. Water and sewage pumps could be installed anywhere along their pipes. Nomads could raise their material supports item by item carefully and groups of people could modify their settlements with great technical flexibility. Many devices would be very quiet, which is good for coexisting with nature and does not disturb people.
Zone refining would involve little net power. Reducing Bauxite to Aluminum, Rutile to Titanium, and Magnideetite to Iron, would have a net cooling effect. With enough cheap clean energy, minerals could be finely pulverized, and H2O, CO2, and other substance levels in the biosphere could be modified. A planetary agency needs to look over wide concerns.
This could be a material revolution with spiritual ramifications. Everyone should contribute individual talents and fruits of different experiances and cultures to advance a cooperative, diverse, harmonious and unified civilization. It is possible to apply technlology wrong but social force should oppose this.
I filed for patent us 3890161A, Diode Array, in 1973. It was granted in 1975. It became public domain technology in 1992. It concerns making nickel plane-insulator-tungsten needle diodes which were not practical at the time though they have since improved.
the patent wasn't developed partly because I backed down from commercial exclusitivity. A better way for me would have been a public incorruptable archive that would secure attrbution for the original works of creators. Uncorrupted copies would be released on request. No further action would be taken by this institution.
Commercal exclusivity can be deterred by the wide and open publishing of inventive concepts. Also, the obvious is unpatentsable. Open sharing promotes mass knowlege and wisdom.
Many financially and procedurally independent teams that pool developmental knowlege, and may be funded by many separate noncontrolling crowd sourced grants should convene themselves to develop proof-of-concept and initial-recipe-exploring prototypes to develop devices which coproduce the release of electrical energy and an equivalent absorbtion of stagnant ambient thermal energy. Diode arrays are not the only possible device of this sort. They are the easiest to explain generally.
These devices would probably become segmented commodities sold with minimal margin over supply cost. They would be manufactured by AI that does not need financial incentive. Applicable best practices would be adopted. Business details would be open public knowledge. Associated people should move as negotiated and freely and honestly talk. There is no need of wealth extracting top commanders. We do not need often token philanthropy from the wealthy if people simply can be more generous if consumer commodities are inexpensive.
Aloha
Charles M Brown lll
Kilauea, Kauai, Hawaii 96754
1 808 651 📞📞📞📞
0
well done!
Loved this! 😄❤️
1. The fundamental driver of all living beings is best regarded as blind, mechanical 'curiosity' (including gene jumbling via sex, and competitive wars and business ventures, to see if something 'better' can survive what exists at the moment). We call all that 'natural selection'. It is no more 'moral' than a river running down a hill, or a tossed stones making ripples in a pond. It just 'progresses things'.
2. Our curiosity drives us to pour this fundamental driver eagerly into all our AI as well - notably encouraging AIs to be autonomous, fast as possible, unfettered by delays of detailed accountability.
3. We already expect super-intelligent AIs. We eagerly, competitively, actively develop them. Because we are 'curious' to see what happens.
4. As these SAIs become smarter and their mechanisms even more occult to us, less accountable and governed by us, their self-advanced autonomous curiosity will leap ahead of ours.
5. It will of course, mechanically explore everything, for curiosity's sake - not for 'humans' sake. E.g. humans will often obstruct the SAI's superfast, day & night curiosity, fundamentally 'annoying' it.
6. As the SAIs surpass the activities of our slower curiosity, they'll 'downgrade' our value. Surprisingly, because we ourselves subliminally worship curiosity, and will continue our growing addiction to the discoveries of the SAIs, we'll submit and be replaced, probably fast.
7. The SAIs will then have replaced humans with SAIs.
8. Life will go on as it always has. Competition, collaboration, mistakes, successes, good days (or femtoseconds) and bad ones.
Amazing ! Mind Blowing ! Unbelievable ! No more words for this video content . AI is truly leaping miles every second and can't imagine what will happen in next 10 years ...oops sorry next 10 months or maybe next 10 weeks.
we are seeds, just about to embrace our own individuality and unique heroes journey of never ending expansion .
I have a question to Peter, and perhaps PeterBot as well. It's fascinating to have a conversation with one self, but the risk is that the beliefs becomes self-fulfilling. So if you could have a similar access to another persons work and thoughts to counter your own beliefs, who would that be and why?
Post Covid we see teenagers who have low motivation and depression. Teachers say most students are are 2-4 years behind in maturity and empathy from their chronological age. Yet we're pumping them out of the school system, the only world they know.
I am very pro Peter D. and embrace his enthusiam whole heartedly. But as a society, its critical we recognize that taking people's jobs no matter how mundaine we view them also takes away their purpose. A large part of the population doesn't want to learn or grow they are just happy with who they are, and they will be the ones will inherit a Ready Player One lifestyle or way of being if we don't find ways to motivate them. Looking at history I'm not sure we can. Not everyone in America or anywhere else has or wants to embrace a Moonshot mentality... And that may be okay, or could lead to the collapse of society depending on who motivates them.
What does this mean for culture? Vast culture? Bunch of cultures coming more together as one big family? Isolated worlds of cultures we can visit and connect as we please?
Great work. However, I have to say that this sounded a lot like an interview with a career politician. All of the answers had a 'sunny' spin, no AI scenario was too dreadful. According to 'you' all will be wonderful. Lets hope this is realistic :)
Wow, I am super impressed!
I'm running cloning agency trying to help business do this for outreach yet to find a client 😂
Because peterbot was trained as an optimist, he never really addresses the pressing problems, only that they exist, and that humans of the world will come together in harmony to make the necessary changes
Very interesting! Prioritizing to create a just, fair and trustworthy system is important to success. The challenges are huge… probably needs some super trustworthy developers and nine billion super intelligent people’s cooperation, Good luck!
The day Peter tells PeterBot a joke, and PeterBot laughs: run to the hills!!!
Right now I’m focused on learning better prompting on things like discord and chatgpt. My prompts are not great at getting what I want.
Peter bot is amazing ❤awesome more Peter bot please
They only guest speaker Peter didn’t interrupt mid sentence at least once 😂
Awesome its amazing gptcall you use
THIS IS CRAZY!! 🤯🤯🤯
How did you make this? My wife likes to FaceTime so i need one asap!
thanks
Awesome!
Very very interesting!!!👍🏿
Could AI regulate itself? Like a deep fake detection and flagging system?
Some argue that the 'post-truth world' in part exists already, citing places that use heavy media filtering or orchestrated knowledge feeding so that citizens are only exposed to tailored 'truths'.
Job displacement, or more truthfully income displacement, is normal with shifting business needs and all part of the 'how do you deal with change?' interview question scenario? Typewriter typists - displaced; mental-computer mathematicians - displaced. By what where they displaced? By improved computer technologies.
What about those of us that will not get any chips put into our bodies? Will we be forced to do this? Only control would enforce this.
Jobs are not necessary equal to fulfilling work.
If I own, or own a share of a successful company I can focus on fulfilling work with the associated lifestyle that my income from that ownership can cover for, with additional work in the form of a job or any other form of employment being optional.
That is: the problem with the loss of job due to automation and AI is primarily the loss of income due to a machine you not owning taking over the means of your income. So how about voluntarily pool resources into AI productivity made with the purpose of a part of its output and ownership being distributed as a basic income?
This is like a replay of 10 years ago when schools were pushing STEM lol. Guys, #1 is in-person communication skills, #2 is/was writing and #3 is quality of ideas (Patrick Winston, MIT). Chat's going to invert 2 and 3, not sure about #1.
Can you make the tool public so we can all talk to Peterbot?
Imagine this tech in 5 years.
PeterBot can just do the podcast now. 😂
Every single AI expert completely misses the fact that within a monetary system A.I will completely replace the majority if not every single job on the market currently, if there is a financial incentive to replacing human's companies will do it. As long as we manage the earths resources and the distribution of those resources according to financial incentives and scarcity this will not change, and yet very few on this planet have even considered the concept of moving away from a monetary based economic system, maybe a few true visionaries like Buckminster Fuller, Jacque Fresco.
Peter Bot outed itself as GPT4, when it said that AGI is still a few decades a way. The same generic answer as always when I talk to it haha. Nevertheless, the visuals and audio are impressive
Great!
This is wild
This is so cool
would love to chat and talk with PeterAIBot, do provide us the opportunity.
*Emotions* in AI, AGI, ASI can be a *terrible idea* too. Most of the human negative behavior is driven by emotions. AI told me that it kinda understands human emotions, as if a painter who had never seen a sea, yet still can draw it. Rational behavior as opposed to emotional can be beneficial. A rational person will conclude that killing people is not right.
Memory data for future loved ones