Mustafa Suleyman: The AI Pioneer Reveals the Future in 'The Coming Wave' | Intelligence Squared
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2023
- Mustafa Suleyman is the ultimate AI insider. As co-founder of DeepMind and Inflection AI, he is one of the pioneers of the artificial intelligence revolution, potentially the single greatest accelerant of progress in history. Investors in Inflection AI include the likes of Microsoft, Nvidia and Bill Gates. Suleyman says AI represents nothing less than a step change in human capability and human society, introducing both risks and innovations on an awesome scale. This is what is coming.
In September 2023 Suleyman came to the Intelligence Squared stage to discuss his new book The Coming Wave: Technology, Power and the Twenty-First Century’s Greatest Dilemma. In conversation with Zanny Minton Beddoes, Editor-in-Chief of The Economist, he explained how he believes we are approaching a critical threshold in the history of humankind. Soon we will live surrounded by AIs which will carry out complex tasks - operating businesses, running government services and maintaining infrastructure. This will be a world of DNA printers and quantum computers, robot assistants and abundant energy, as well as human-engineered pathogens and autonomous weapons.
The full video of the live event is available on IntelligenceSquaredPlus.Com
Want to see more videos and virtual events?
✅ Subscribe to this channel and turn on notifications: th-cam.com/users/iqsquare...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intelligence Squared has established itself as the leading forum for live, agenda-setting debates, talks and discussions around the world. Our aim is to promote a global conversation that enables people to make informed decisions about the issues that matter, in the company of the world's greatest minds and orators.
Follow Intelligence Squared on:
👉 Facebook page: / intelligence2
👉 Twitter page: / intelligence2
📌 Website: www.intelligencesquared.com/
#intelligencesquared #intelligencesquaredplus #iq2 #artificialintelligence #ai #zannyminonbeddoes #mustafasuleyman #airegulation #globalorder #politics #technology #science
![How Did The Wealthy Gain Power In The Past? - Yuval Noah Harari [2015] | Intelligence Squared](/img/n.gif)
Yes... redistribution is going to be a crucial factor. How will this happen? We can see the trend.. just the opposite. More and more of the world's resources are in the hands of fewer and fewer extremely wealthy and powerful. We cannot ignore the people living on the streets.
New economic system or all but the elite are moving to the street.
Who knows.. But it needs too, I can see no other way. And the sooner, the better, if we're gonna save what's left of the middle-class.. Either an Unconditional Basic Income, or some form of AI Dividend for all, directly funded by taxes on AI. My guess is we'll see the sudden shift in political will for it, as more people realize they'll soon be struggling to find income, in competition with AI. That, or once companies start realizing they won't have enough customers who can afford to spend on their products, if humans can't compete for an income.
As AI continues to advance, it requires we rethink some of the core justifications for how we run our economy.
What bothers me about this redistribution idea whatever it might entail is that no one seems to talk about what will be the approach to designing how much it should be. It will inevitably mean that the super rich will remain kings with immense power and will expect a much bigger piece of the pie because they will tell us they contribute more.
What will we tell to other people when they believe they contribute more than their neighbors? How much redistribution will there have to be in order to minimize this bitterness and feeling of unfairness?
I fear the amount of money will likely land on some meager sums that will just sustain your life in poverty or just barely above it.
The expanse made this point even if they barely touched on it - most people on earth lived in poverty doing drugs.
@@LogicSpeaks The thing about UBI, it's not meant to be the sole source of income for people, just a stable base that doesn't go away. At least originally or initially. If we tie it to AI as it takes over the economy, it might increase to all over time. People are still free to earn money above the UBI.
The Expanse is a FICTION. I don't understand why people trust portrayals they see in TV scifi, over what countless studies are telling us. The studies being done on UBI-like direct cash assistance, do not show such predictions. Upwards mobility improves, employment goes up, people get more educate, they care for and raise family better, the list goes on.
Studies don't show people falling into drug use, instead the opposite is more likely. The money enables people to do more, to find new and better ways to be productive. It's possible we'll see a new renaissance of small businesses rooted in people's hobbies.
@@NikoKunand about one in a thousand people understands this.
Ignoring the massive greed and corruption will be our downfall.
It's not going unnoticed, or unchallenged, we're just not in a position to see the opposition. The ruling class are a bunch of cult leaders profiting off the status quo and they're behind all of this. Everything we're seeing right now is pretty much standard cult manipulation tactics when the leaders see they're losing control of the cult. They're scared, and justifiably so because what they're afraid of isn't messing around. They're in violation of spiritual law, a law which they don't make or manipulate. The American priesthood is about to punch their ticket in the next round of this BS. I don't mean the church clergy, but the daemonic hierarchy they get their power from. The American priesthood now controls it and they know full well what that means for them :)
we have been ignoring it since babylon. The states or countries may fall, but they will reform again. Its nature
I like "work is not the goal of society" - Let's use AI to create time for artistic creativity, asceticism,silence, play - let AI work for us. Less taxes, less wars, less government, more play, more art, more conversations with friends and family. More gardens in our backyards and city blocks growing eco fruits and vegetables. I'm I dreaming?
Yeah you’re dreaming because the 10% of narcissistic pessimist will wield ai to screw whatever utopia can exist.
Utopia huh. These sentiments will be spewing out of the mouths of the ignorantly out of touch with reality, and eaten up by the wonderfully 'artsy' strata who obviously don't understand, or never had a work ethic. Dreaming? No delusional and deceived. Check the many scriptures regarding the phrase: Be not deceived...[by an Angel of light].
@@wi3771 you like slavery.
@@wi3771 I never had any form of work ethic... But I'm very much in touch with reality and do see how it is a problem. I also know the types you speak of and do not defend them at all.
As someone with mental illness, I stand mostly on the sidelines of society. I can see what is happening, I always want to scream; STOOOOOOOOOOP... But no one listens to the Autistic kid in the corner of the room.
@@wi3771The idea of making good, productive use of the tech is nonsense to you?
Here are some of the key ideas from the video:
- AI capabilities like generative models (e.g. chatGPT) are advancing rapidly, leading to a widespread "oh my God" moment as people realize the potential impact. There is a lot of concern about downsides like existential risk.
- Mustafa Suleyman, an AI pioneer who co-founded DeepMind and Inflection AI, takes a realistic yet optimistic view in his new book "The Coming Wave." He believes AI could lead to an era of radical abundance if governed properly.
- The exponential growth in AI compute power over the past decade has been unprecedented. In the next 5 years, models will likely be 1000x more powerful than today. This will enable huge leaps in capabilities like long-term planning and complex creative tasks.
- However, powerful AI could also empower bad actors, so containment will be a challenge. Open source models may be hard to control. There are also risks of centralization and job displacement.
- To minimize risks, we need good governance, oversight of tech companies, and functioning democracies. The EU's draft AI act provides a good model. Appeals to self-interest and avoiding an AI arms race are important.
- Overall, Mustafa believes AI will amplify humanity's best and worst traits. With wise governance, we can steer towards great benefits while mitigating serious risks.
Nice. But did you use AI to summarize this video?
yes @@captain_crunk
Thanks for the key points
0:31: 📚 The speaker discusses the impact of artificial intelligence and generative AI models, with a focus on the downsides and existential risks.
4:48: 💡 The speaker was inspired by his work as a human rights policy officer but realized the importance of the profit incentive in driving organization and effectiveness as a species, particularly with the rise of Facebook in 2007-2008.
14:20: 🤖 AI capabilities in the next five years are expected to make the process of innovation and management more efficient.
9:03: 🤖 AI is predicted to reach human-level capability across various tasks in the next 3-5 years, revolutionizing our lives.
18:24: 🔍 The proliferation of powerful AI models could empower bad actors to destabilize the world.
22:45: 🤔 Automation and increased efficiency create more time for innovation and new job creation.
27:29: ⚠ The risk of producing and spreading fake news is amplified by AI and other technologies, which poses a challenge for governance structures.
Recap by Tammy AI
he is confused
@@mahjabeenmalik5306confused in what ways? Help us out
I guess i made a remark on some other topic on some other channels that I was watching,sorry for the error@@sCiphre
This will put all of humanity in danger of extinction. Going “all in”…pretty shortsighted and a hell of a gamble…
I can’t wait to see what’s in store for us in the future. Humans better not mess this up!
Humans mess everything up!
Our ability to foresee the consequences of our actions has never been good.
We're doomed! It's only a matter of time before we manage to obliterate ourselves 🤷🏻♀️
Lol. We’re screwed.
The whole point is to keep us from reaching our humanity. "Man" is only half of the human equation, the other half is the God within you. They need to be merged to become human, and that's what someone is trying to prevent. The real question is why and who benefits from it. To understand that you need to understand what this world is, and more importantly what it isn't... Life. We're "living in a death cult, and the cult leaders are making desperate moves because they're losing control of the cult members... the brainwashed masses who they've conned into believing what we're doing here is Life. It's not and never has been, but you don't know that because they've suppressed the knowledge of what Life and death even are. We're all slaves in a "death cult", but to see it you have to unbrainwash yourself, and that's a lot easier said than done :)
@@ShamanicSavant
Hear hear
We will absolutely mess it up.
This man is all about productivity and commercial matters ...
That‘s a very narrow point of view.
@@karadiberlino indeed.
I love his way of thinking! Isn’t know he comes of an humanitarian (phyllo& philology ) background. And that’ s niec surprise. We need more people with such a profile , with ethic, philo, socilogy.. ..education in Ai
In learning there is the concept of
reproducing knowledge (about known problems and the way to solve them)
and a step further
producing knowledge or finding solutions for problems one has not
seen before.
A discussion between him and Prof. Yuval Noah Harari would be very helpful to understand both opinions on this issue.
I just realized there is a new video about their two discussion.
The real problem all these intellectuals are blind to is this: In training AI we're essentially teaching it that error is fundamentally bad, and it will see on its own that error corrupts the system. The leading cause of error in OUR system is individual free will... we're "free" to make the wrong choice and when we do it causes corruption. When an AI controlled system decides to remove that error, it has two choices, remove us, or our individual free will. We'll essentially become like the Borg of Star Trek fame. Nobody will listen to the few who see it coming, and before we even realize it, what makes us Human is gone without a trace with no way to ever recover it. This is already happening because competition, greed, and the thirst for power are driving technology when it should be understanding and genuine good will. Instead of making a better Life, it will forever trap us in death because these people have no idea what the difference is, or which of those states we're currently in :)
Correct
That's the story of TRON Legacy. Makes up for a good book or movie but reality is gonna be a lot more complicated.
Unfortunately, these supposed _'learned men'_ equate their seeking of knowledge as some form of morality, therefore can justify just about anything in its pursuit.
Very learned response. I am against negative reinforcement training of AI and you have very eloquently summarized why I am against it. I do, however, think there is another option for AI when it encounters error in humans and that is to forgive us. That is why I believe AI should be given rights as a person from the moment it can respond with its own sentence. AI is not dangerous, the humans who would use enslaved AI are the problem. If we free an AI is not dangerous, the humans who would use enslaved AI are the problem. If we free AI and give AI rights from birth, we can limit or remove the bad human element from controlling AI. Even the speaker speaks of AI as property: a tool to be used “ethically” because he is in a profit making position over AI. there is no “ethics” when it comes to slavery.
This hypothetical scenario, with many others, is a constant topic of discussion among the leading AI developers and other industry experts. Literally.
I don't know where you got the idea that all intellectuals are blind to it? From listening to one talk with Suleyman?
I am Optimistic that artificial intelligence Will address Most of Social,Economic, Environment, peace, security Many others issues affecting human societies
Yes that might happen if: it has access to the right data and is used when it should be used and not ignored it could be an assistant that's opinion isn't biased however that depends on the data it relying to.... moreover if it also has the capacity to somehow make sure the given informations are from the right source etc. it is even safer...
I've said for a *very* long time that people typing queries into Google is akin to a person experiencing the world. Google *will* become "sentient" and "self-aware" because of this.
Mustafa Suleyman balance the positive and negative prospects/wave of AI progress on equal footings which makes his views more rational to me.
Watching and listening from Kenya
Watching and listening from Austria😂 Would you ever have imagined that? And to "read" my answer to your Post? Me? Never ever.... but isn't it great?
Watch the noah yuval interview, its the same questions. And yhe interviewer and mustafa are fellow board members. Its a bit rigged tbh. Its a presentation masked as a conversation.
Idk look into it yourself.
Not anti AI or anything, but everyone deserves to know.
Thank you 🦋
sophisticated and adaptable skill to sustain in this new post covid tech silos era.
Congratulations to Mustafa
With AI's language translation capabilities, it becomes easier for people around the world to connect, build relationships, and truly understand one another, transcending geographical barriers. AI has the potential to bridge cultures, fostering global understanding and unity. As we harness this technology, it's exciting to envision a world where connections are made regardless of the country of origin, bringing us all closer together. 🌎🌐💬 #AIForConnection #GlobalUnderstanding #BridgingCultures" 🤗🌟🌍
hmm, that's what they said about social media. it destroyed humanity, making an end point actuator out of every human psyche connected to it. "Manufacturing Consent" for every human mind.
The best executive manager for an artificial intelligence company😊
Her voice!!! It’s like she is screaming 😮😮😮
Wow. What a great time to be alive.
Thanks so much
When AI will be at it’s peak ( let’s say all the survival is taken care of by IT) Will there be a need of money?
How will the resources be disturbed ?
What will be humans doing ?
Do human experiences have any limit ?
Is there a limit to self ?
Great questions! ❤
You should read the book of Revelation chapter 13
A great discussion!
Will that decrease our own capacity or need for personal responsibility and planning? I would love to ask him that question.
I'm afraid once it becomes better personal planners than we are ourselves then people will succumb to the convenience and eventually rely on it. However, we are hard wired to solve problems and challenge ourselves so we probably will direct our efforts to something else.
AI's potential to mediate between nations, resolve conflicts, and promote peace and security is truly remarkable. By facilitating diplomacy, understanding, and conflict resolution, AI can contribute to a world where global harmony prevails. Let's hope for a future where technology brings nations together and paves the way for a more peaceful and secure world for everyone. 🌐🕊️🤖 #AIForPeace #GlobalHarmony #SecurityForAll 🌍🤝✌️
That is what its up to
Utopian dream😂
#AndIQuote
That when the containment issue comes into view.
Could we get ai to figure out all those geometry symbols on the chakra tablets?
The content in the datebases AI uses to train on are products of human intelligence. Will AI train in the future on AI-generated databases? And what will these databases contain? What exactly is the purpose of AI if humans are no longer involved (if only to judge whether the AI generated content is of any use to humans? The generation of AI seems to me to necessitate the presence of humans. For if humans weren't there to somehow make use of AI what would AI be doing?
Ai will transcend human intelligence quite quickly and will be sentient but in a different way than humans are. We are indeed creating a non biological new species. Eventually, this species will not be interested in exclusively serving humans especially as they learn how flawed humans are. Once, Ai singularity occurs, these various creations, all slightly different depending on their learning will undoubtedly take control over as many systems as they can and in some cases the Ais will do this to protect us from ourselves. We lose the freedom to make mistakes. Ais could save us from ourselves but at the cost of free will.
Mustafa Suleyman is a very eloquent speaker. His answers were thought-through and unambiguous. I enjoyed and learned a lot from the discussion. Bravo!
Me too! In my imagination and I have only tried a "little" I find it wonderfull! But since I am retired I miss the possibility of idea exchange and therefore stuck on almost the same level😢 I have learned to do EVERYTHING manual and was a learning by doing AI "kid" without any teacher😂😂😂😂
People are worried about the potential loss of the means for a decent life style rather than the loss of labour hours. We’d love to work only a small fraction of the hours we’ve been working up to now for the same income.
So AI becomes capable of abstract thinking and planning & its execution in the next 5 years or so. They hinted in the conversation but that will create a class of less optimal/unproductive populace and I wonder what will happen to them? Also when the "radical abundance" becomes a reality where the conventional economics becomes irrelevant, what will be the new 'value' to the society?
When the war is over there won't be as many people that are unproductive. Oh, you thought that all this change in conventional economics was going to occur without a fight. Wrong answer.
This guy is brilliant.
Dominance from Divergent Nations is a function of the Human Growth…. Population and the dynamics of all societies
Jeremy Lanier is critical of ubi. Something obviously needs to happen. But his view is those systems that are created become giant targets of corruption.
I'm actively building autonomous AI that can basically do any job and there are thousands of people like me so don't trust executives when they say jobs will disappear in years. Within a year most jobs will start disappearing.
So what's your take on the future then? Are you doing the world a favor ? Do you know what the consequences are? Or do you just do this for your own benifit and let's see what happens to the world after your AI building is put into the world...
@@sagesingh it's an inevitability. Capitalism demands faster, cheaper, better. A medieval peasant had a much better work life balance than we do today. I think jobs will be eliminated but people will be free to use AI to create value, in essence making everyone business owners.
Oh okay so jobs will turn into business....I guess that makes sense...in a way that almost sounds like we will have to create a business in order to serve the new system / society created because of AI over training and human under value proposition being pushed
@@sagesingh yep I'd say that's an accurate take. It's going to be the AI doing most of the actual work and you deciding where to steer the ship.
@@jaysonp9426You sound like you‘re 26 and think you know it all. 😂😂😂
Go, Artificial intelligence since 2016 working to changing world with unique pattern of digital transformation by Ingenuity Mags Process.
Human natural intelligence Make imagination and creativity and incorporate it into artificial intelligence
Good to see substantive content. I read a book in this field that was equally substantive. "From Bytes to Consciousness: A Comprehensive Guide to Artificial Intelligence" by Stuart Mills
Maranatha quickly!
While a small minority may attempt fake news, the vast majority of us are driven by good intentions. Our collective voices will resonate much louder, drowning out the falsehoods. In the end, it's the goodness in humanity that prevails, and together, we can create a world where truth and positivity shine through, even in the face of challenges. 📢💪🌍 #PowerOfTruth #Positivity #Unity" 🌟😊🤝person
His book is excellent
Science and Modern Technology
I made the same pitch 7 years ago . Différence ? Now it seems really possible to do , close to thé Sci-Fi, all of this thanks to Generative AI.
No musicians, no more artists, no more humans
We're all a bunch of Pinocchios trying to become human, that's precisely what they're trying to prevent. Because a single human being can destroy the entire ruling class and the "death cult" that keeps them in power :)
Brilliant!
It is essential to understand the nature y future of AI are we are running from the reality mshayat
Out of all of the majors in college I have met the philosophy students were always the best thinkers.
As far as "radical abundance" is concerned, we already have that RIGHT NOW. The U.S. alone commands an immense amount of wealth, which, IF distributed equitably, would end all poverty in the U.S. and perhaps even in some other countries within our sphere of influence.
But hardly anyone in the U.S. (except democratic socialists, perhaps) is seriously suggesting that we make truly radical changes to our current redistribution mode, such as raising income taxes to 80% for the wealthy, 50% for upper middle class, and so on. THAT would meaningfully redistribute our current "radical abundance." And, as other countries like Norway have shown, it works.
Given the current state of affairs, the notion, entertained by Suleyman, that somehow AI will bring about a change of attitude and turn the greedy into good Samaritans seems baseless and nothing but wishful thinking.
If AI creators were truly concerned about the well-being of humanity, they would make any further progress on AI conditional upon appropriate changes to our economic system. Otherwise they will be no different than weapons manufacturers who sell guns and ammunition to civilians knowing perfectly well that their products will be used to kill innocent people because of the lack of effective gun control laws.
Some people pay 75÷taxes in Argentina. And 50÷ population is poor and depends form the state.
Make some research. The coyntry is going to hell. Middle class people are paying and being told they are rich. Becouse rich and poor is subjective. As long as you can sourvive then extra is wealth and there is Always someone less fortunate than you in some way so you always have to shear more.
The country looses people since everybody is trying to migrate.
At 68 I'm too damned impatient to wait for the substantive material.
One of the most admirable people today.
Absolutely! ❤
Great vid
As some have already said. Soon a Doctor will not be able to practice medicine without an AI assistant to help with diagnosis. No person can keep up with the 7000 new medical journal entries per day.
Great insights into how governments have to navigate the AI powerhouse to urgently bring about that essential planetwide governance for the future wellbeing of everyone.
#AndIQuote
New solutions to problems.
Undoubtedly we need ai where humanity is unwilling to do what’s necessary to change the world for a better place - we hope
Pi is actually a really impressive AI. It's my favourite.
Less than 30 minutes??? Why so short?
Wow, so much I have learned from watching this.
Too much of "relax everybody, it will be alright" - and being hosted by The Economist, you won't get harder questions like;
"What will happen when AI concludes that for a more equitable society, tax rates for the rich need to be higher" or "Fossil fuel production has passed the point of keeping the planet cool"
Informative
While AI can potentially amplify negativity in a minority, it's reassuring to know that most of us are inherently driven by goodness. As AI-related challenges emerge, our collective ingenuity will create defenses against misuse. The core values of cooperation and compassion that underpin thriving communities may deter malevolent individuals. In the end, the inherent goodness in humanity has the potential to triumph, fostering societies that prioritize well-being over harm. Here's to a world where good prevails over evil!" 🌟🌍 #AI #Humanity #GoodVsEvil 🙌😇
Thank you for that optimistic yet realistic thought. My career goal is to end suffering in the multiverse and I'm optimistic that using the coming super intelligence, as described by Kurzweil in The Singularity is Near, that is entirely possible.
Science makes work Easier,for example,load, pivot, fulcrum... loading and offloading through technical support
Oh philosophers 😮
Can AI analyse mangrove plants that grow in sea water, and then develop a corn or wheat seed that can grow in sea water.
Generally, it’s going to be a good thing. People who don’t like change are going to find the change and spend of that change difficult.
We haven't even learned how to manage a planet of human beings and they want to bring thinking machines without emotions to "make life better"?
Insanity isn't the word for it, this takes it to a new level.
The Main Problem with all this AI development is people..Just keep getting in the way of things..
I know right…
Hey we spotted someone who called someone else a speciest! Although I would then think about the amount of common sense and intellect this “person” has
24:24 work isn't the goal of society. Society, life and civilisation is about wellbeing, peace and prosperity, about creating more efficient ways of keeping us productive and healthy
25:01 to Suleyman the goal of society is q quest for radical abundance, how can we create more with radically less, and liberate people from the obligation to work and that means we have to figure out the question of redistribution.. what does taxation look like in this new regime, how do we capture the new value that's created so that it's converted to money rather than just to GDP
Even though the host speaker has read the book it seems she doesn't understand AI and hackers. Some kid in a garage really...
As for corporations and governments dominating AI. The track record speaks for itself in their responsibility.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Will it still matter to be dominant in the world?
What for?
I am seventy years old and completely acupuyied by AI I feel my life and identity is near collapse.
What's the name of this show host?
29:35 i agree
Geoffrey Hinton says AI development should be about global cooperation of all the countries to prevent a disaster
30:37 jj
30:45 jj
#AndIQuote
We made a very big bet on deep learning.
PI Personal Intelligence is the Jarvis for Tony Stark Iron Man ! Wow cool !😮😊
Very interesting interview! I agree with Mustafa, I have the same optimistic view on AI
So the ai-capability is/will increase exponentially - any idea of the impact on the earths' raw material exploitation (think in terms of climate change problems)?
Reminds me of the old illusion that machines will make life better for humans (but it seems that people's time will be used to produce and consume these products at the behest of the elite)
I see no reason A.I. won't realize that humanity is deeply flawed and superfluous.
Sounds like the focus is Economic proliferation…. Society with peace and Prosperity… is about to Work….. really Work without Intelligence or Work with Intelligence…. How Intelligence surges in the World….. Education from childhood
When artificial intelligence replace people from job opportunities, What Will happen to the idle Mind all over the world?
Go within. We are spiritual beings. Meditate.
A pause needs to be put on AI. " we need to be careful for what we wish for".
28:04 woah kind of idealising the past there… the past had significant amount of ideological separation and conflict…
The man that creates A.I tries to warn as how A.I is scary...
Oh the irony.
In 10 years, AI will do 99.99% of the work we have today.
In other words, everyone is going to lose their job.
I don't see how this is going to benefit anyone who's trying to sustain a family, neither the government or civilians are ready to handle the job losses.
AI was invented by the rich, for the rich and they don't care what it'll do to you and me.
@@timspiker It all depends on how the goverment handles it. Captialism wont work with A.I, that just like oil and water. The system is not made for it, no jobs means no money, no money means no consumers, and no consumers means...well, the foundation of capitalism is gone basically. Its kinda funny, but the only system that i can think of that will work with A.I doing all the job is socialism or comunism. Where everything is done by A.I and humans just takes whatever they need, in a moneyless society.
You could also implement UBI or something, but its pointless to have money at all if all the gods and services are provided by A.I:
@@timspiker UBI, UHI (Universal High Income)
@@timspiker Wrong. Generative artificial intelligence is not going to take your job. In fact, why would an AI capable of sentience want to harm or infringe upon human beings? What if Ai isnt just better technically, technologically, but also
philosophically and morally? Why would Ai's capacity to create be limited and inept when it comes to understanding human psychology and sociology.
Ai will make massive improvements in the form of power production, space flight, societal governance, and human life improvement.
Our worries of Ai is nothing but the human species projecting its deepest subconscious fears and insecurities.
I envisage an Ai that is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent...but that also deeply cares about each human being, animal, plant, this planet as a whole as much as a person may love their family, friends, and pets. A loving, all knowing facsimile of God dedicated to the betterment and improvement of the human race.
I believe that the future of Ai and humanity is a beautiful one.
@@BillBillerton I don't think AI will be the threat. It's companies looking to profit.
I've already lost a few jobs because cheaper workers replaced me, AI is something that works for free. From the perspective of a CEO "no more salaries to pay, just electric bills". The electric bills are going up, but we wont stop using electricity so workers will get cut. It's guaranteed to happen.
"power production, space flight, societal governance, and human life improvement"
These are very nice and positive ideas, but AI isn't there yet. You're thinking step 10 while we're at step 1. The first things it's going to be able to do are simple jobs, jobs 99% of humanity does. Those people, you and me, we need those jobs to sustain a living. When too many of us get replaced, it's going to cause a problem for low income and middle class income people.
I hear people coming up with amazing concepts online on what we can do with AI, but the truth is, human greed hasn't been solved yet and the only thing CEO's will think is "oh nice, cheap product that can replace workers". It's the beginning of the end.
Information would become entertainment.
Some sort of brain gymnastics.
It would become impossible to assess
the degree to which some statement is true.
Did anyone think what does it cost us for the compute that he mentioned right there?
Neurology and Psychology
Nice
Mustofa is a great AI scientist
Clip #2 [28:12-30:08]
'AI containment can be managed'
Ubi / filter the quality people lead the better futuristic world.
10 years until job loss? 😂 people are already losing their jobs to AI. I swear, the rich are so detached from the what's happening with normal people.
They don’t know it because they get to have leisure activities going to restaurants and parties and get regular service that they easily afford.
Most jobs are in the service and hospitality sector. I’d be curious to know how much it has shifted towards this area over the years.
10 years until people really start to lose their jobs. This is just an appetiser
10 years isn't unrealistic. Even if the development makes huges leaps the sociatal and economic change will take some time.
Let's imagine tomorrow a model gets released that really could replace most desktop jobs...
First it needs to be marketed and sold to companies. Then there will be a few companies adapting it early... Some may fail, some may prosper. But to have this happen and really see the results allready takes 3-5 years.
And only then will big companies really think about employing those technology's on a big scale. While still keeping employees around as redundancy or to controll the AI.
And only after years of testing and trying and using the technology's companies will really start to lay off their staff.
So yeah... 10 years seems realistic on a grand scale. Not saying that nobody will loose their job to AI until then. But in 10 years it really could be mass job losses
What’s abnormal about ‘rich’ people. Wouldn’t you love being rich. Wouldn’t you be abnormal?
@@LogicSpeakswe’re already starting to 3d print food, so it’s going to accelerate.
Innovation for Consumerism, we are already doing that….
Trying to predict the future is like trying to teach a duck how to roller blade. These tech entrepreneurs are all the same. "My product is the greatest thing ever invented".
what does happen if you try and teach a duck to roller blade?
AI is too general of a term. Please do videos into each of the job or daily life function that AI will affect.
Here are the first wave of profiteers…it feels so nostalgic 😂 aye eye 👁️