Michael Douglas Explores The Causes Of Our Political Polarization In “America’s Burning”
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ค. 2024
- Legendary actor, writer and producer Michael Douglas tells Stephen what motivated him to get involved in a documentary project that looks at the root causes of this country’s political polarization. “America’s Burning” hits theaters this Friday.
#Colbert #MichaelDouglas #AmericasBurning #Documentary
Subscribe To "The Late Show" Channel: bit.ly/ColbertTH-cam
Watch full episodes of "The Late Show": bit.ly/1Puei40
Listen to "The Late Show Pod Show" podcast: link.chtbl.com/Awagtx95?sid=yt
Like "The Late Show" on Facebook: on. 1df139Y
Follow "The Late Show" on X: bit.ly/1dMzZzG
Follow "The Late Show" on Instagram: bit.ly/29wfREj
Watch The Late Show with Stephen Colbert weeknights at 11:35 PM ET/10:35 PM CT. Only on CBS.
---
Stephen Colbert brings his signature satire and comedy to THE LATE SHOW with STEPHEN COLBERT, the #1 show in late night, where he talks with an eclectic mix of guests about what is new and relevant in the worlds of politics, entertainment, business, music, technology and more. Featuring bandleader Louis Cato and “THE LATE SHOW band,” the Peabody Award-winning and Emmy Award-nominated show is broadcast from the historic Ed Sullivan Theater. Stephen Colbert took over as host, executive producer and writer of THE LATE SHOW on Sept. 8, 2015. - บันเทิง
I purchased a copy of Ben Franklin’s “Fart Proudly” book in Philadelphia while visiting the Liberty Bell. It was a gift to my husband😊
@@VDash-Slesinski Michael douglas is good in everything he does
😂
At the age of 63 I have discovered what a "proud fart" is. It lasts a full two seconds and crescendos at the end.
@mcpbaa3000
And has killer smell!
And??
Cool! I grew up w Micahel in Westport, CT. Glad he's producing these important works & still kickin' it! Thanks Stephen
he looks so much like his dad
I thought it was him when I saw the thumbnail
It's time for you to visit your optometrist!
Like your Dad now, or your Dad always?
@@rohieram724😮. I saw it too. Looks like you're a minority.
Ehh, think he looks like his son... just me I guess.
Good morning stephen colbert fans
All equestrians know that “bottom burps” are a desirable sign of good digestion!
Yes, they are! And, the smellier, the better!
Amazing star amazing bravo Michael fan
He looks almost exactly like his dad did at this age.
No one does a better impersonation of Kirk than Michael!
Voice so similar, too !
Looks a little older than his actual age though
not at all. He looks like his dad did at more than 100
@@AdamKing-ir4xc He's almost 80. I think he looks pretty good! ;)
I can not even talk to my Cousins back east anymore because of politics. So sad. As he says we all need to discuss.
I can't talk to my sister because she's a real bitch if that's any consolation.
Dealing with extreme polarization? Engage respectfully and avoid hostile confrontations. Set boundaries and protect your mental health. Stay informed and share credible info. Find common ground on shared values. Join inclusive communities. Practice self-care and mindfulness. Advocate peacefully for justice and equality. Small steps can make a big difference!
What you are advocating won't make any difference if Trump wins in November. Which now seems likely. Do you really think these MAGA types won't try and lord it over everyone? You're foolish if you do.
@Progressive_Canadian (🚗 Canadians sell auto insurance? Just kidding 🙂)
One of the best comments on the entire Internet right there! 👏👏👏
I'm mad that this didn't have replies before me, and VERY mad that it will probably never be seen by the people who need to take this advice the most. ✝️☮️🇺🇲 --J
Where is the Colbert Questionnaire?
I love Mr. Michael Douglas. What an actor! By the way, Mr. Douglas. Could you please run for president? You would do so great!!
And therein lies America's stupidity problem
@@swapshots4427🤣🤣🤣
He is younger than Biden, but he is older than trump!!
My grandchildren deserve someone at least 30 years younger than both trump and Biden!!
@@swapshots4427 (🥃Sure. Take my whiskey, I'll take your vodka... unless it's spiked. 😉)
Jokes aside, I hope you're not implying that Americans are stupid because of individual presidential endorsements for some celebrities, rhetoric that is almost certainly just kidding, light flattery, and/or not-so-stealth dissatisfaction with current candidates in most cases? --J
@@jeyruff429
American's are obsessed with celebrity and wealth. They continually endorse/call for Celebrities wholly unqualified.
Stephen Colbert is great with his humor. No one can beat him, Kimmel or Conan obrien
You forgot Seth Meyers.
@@DuelScreen yes I did love him. Funny guy
@@Buffykc62 (🧛 Slay it 😉)
I guess Fallon and pre-retirement Corden don't really count as political late-night? They're quite fun and appeal more broadly, so maybe they must stay more neutral. --J
@@jeyruff429 OMG
@@Buffykc62 (🏈 Slay it... Chiefs? 😁)
Whaaaaaat?? You don't like Fallon or Corden? If it's my username joke, search these comments for @vegardyrnes1793. You'll see @kevinmcconnell3641 got it _way_ worse. 😆 --J
I Wish Stephen had asked Douglas 'if He Could 'Call DeNiro??'..
I THINK 'DeNiro' Could-Have Explained:
"WHAT THE PROBLEM IS?!?"..
Michael setting the "tone" on set.
I loved this Franklin series. Good job M.D.!!
Love M.D. Nothing like REAL experience (remember this Trump supporters…you’re in big trouble if you vote for him. 😡)
If you watch any political TH-cam vids of past presidents, there was extreme division back then as well. Do you think the 60’s riots were fun & games?
Favourite President go! Mine is number 10
There was a lot of division, but I don't think many 60's protestors were calling for the complete end of democracy and the instatement of an authoritarian Christian government. Yes you had some of the extreme radical left calling for revolution, Maoism, etc., but they were a marginal number of the broad coalition protesting (i) for civil rights and (ii) against the war in Vietnam. MAGA is huge in numbers, and fundamentally against American democracy. Frankly, it's very worrying. But every society has its downfall; France went authoritarian several times after their revolution, in the big picture of history America may just be an experiment in human governance. The blatantly political Supreme Court, and the blatantly political executive, and the division of Congress into a polarized party bloc and the electoral college into an unrepresentative body - none of the checks and balances are functioning.
I was there, in the '60s. Yes, there was great conflict about the Vietnam war and civil rights. But we have never faced as massive an internal movement, blatantly fascist - and with the Supreme Court as an ally - as D.T.'s MAGA, and the stated ideals of "Project 25." We had American Nazis in the '30s, of course, but it wasn't as pervasive.
I declare my independence. I'll be voting for RFK Jr. The best of both worlds.
@@darlacox Cool. And I'll be the next Minister of Prime Justin Trudeau to Jon Tyler JT to JT and I'll do what Biden should have done, and fake a heart attack after being sworn in and allow my big breasted, full figured Vice President (shut up Americans don't tell me Canada doesn't have Vice Pres... Just shut up!) to take over.
really enjoyed Ben Franklin it was the first time I enjoyed Michael Douglas acting/ it was the role of a lifetime he was great in every corner of it
I need a first edition of that. Need it.
lol...lightning in a bottle.
@@swampy6194 First addition of lightning in a bottle?
Good greif, Trump must be a MEGA Franklin fan with his hot air wind and all :-(
Franklin the Turtle?
Gosh, good grief (m/s greif), I haven’t heard that term since Charlie Brown. Golly, gee is next!
@@ToddDouglasFox Poor Charlie Brown, he just couldn't find Christmas. Or Black Santa.
Trump's new book "Shitting yourself with Confidence" is coming out soon. He doesn't believe in Farting, he is actually shitting his pants.
It's disturbing when you see youtubers (usually born yesterday) making videos about how his character in Falling Down 'was good actually'. Stupid people often take what they want from art ignoring what the artist is actually trying to convey.
@Jakeurb8ty82 (😯 If your real name was anything close to "Jakurbate" in grade school, I feel bad for you.)
I don't know what you mean with that first sentence, but on your second: it's the artist's responsibility to get his/her message across more than any audience/partaker to fully understand it. Also, I'm just wondering: if there are "stupid" people who can't "get it" out there, how does your comment help? I'm really asking, I'm not trying to mock you or anything. --J
Slow but sure polarization began with the loss of the Fairness Doctrine as FCC policy. Beginning in 1987, there were no longer requirements to air counterpoints to one-way speech in radio and TV venues. Rush Limbaugh became the template. He could dump callers while talking, overriding anything they said. By never admitting error, and by having the last word, it left the impression that his views were unassailable. This quashing and silencing of opposing views continues in talk radio and TV today.
Trump introduced his lawyer(liar) Ray Cohn to rupert murdoch who then had access to Reagan...
@islandpalm148 (🌴 such a relaxing username)
I would need to research your claims, but if true, I agree with your comment, except to give a caution against your comment's implied conclusion: bringing the Fairness Doctrine back or something similar. I can easily see problems with defining "counterpoint", AND with loopholes around the "fairness" goal, esp. since "fair" is apparently _very_ debatable.
True or false, I agree with you that opposing views shouldn't be quashed. The problem is opposing views _about opposing views_ and definitions! Will we ever agree on the line between reasonable disagreement and language that is hateful, slanderous/libelous, dangerously inciteful, etc.? --J
Michael Douglas is so hot I love him
Please. Make a The Final Countdown Remake. Charlie Sheen could come back.
*Martin.
Though Charlie could play the Nimitz's CAG I reckon. :)
“What’s worth doing is worth doing for money.” ~ Gordon Gekko
I notice Stephen didn't ask him during this segment why he recently travelled to Israel to endorse its genocide. There's quite a polarisation over that issue too, although as with many other issues the polarisation is not so much Democrats vs. Republicans, but rather the majority of the public vs. the political and economic elite.
Fart Proudly...........my bro 😂💨
part 2
Our society has totally degraded.
Doesn't have two
@@tylercaffin3776😮.Yes, if we vote for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, we can keep up the good work done by them. Anything else would be undermining all of the efforts by our forefathers. We're not perfect but our country has never had a dictator and never will.😊
@@tylercaffin3776, you misspelled to. Hope that was a typo. 😊
@@amyreynolds3619 Never had a dictator? Are you like a former Drumpf supporter who's jumping ship? Cause it only works if the women and children go first and the lifeboats are filled to capacity, not just the capacity they could take of rich white person on the Titanic's ego.
@@amyreynolds3619 Quite spotted, and indeed I did because it's a zzzzzz/ed/. but gold star you
Aging finely
Damn youtube reported he had died it good to see he is still around
Wow, his voice really changed (I mean of course but still)
Is Colbert acting or having a real conversation with his guests when they come back from commercials? I’d like to see clips of that - not staged or scripted, tho.
The fix is for Fox News to start providing it's viewers a balanced view of the real world. The alternative is what we have today, where many of it's viewers sound stupid when they repeat what they heard on Fox.
Political polarization is the natural result of democracies' use of primitive voting methods to elect public offices. Primitive voting methods count only one majority (or plurality) and ignore most voters' preferences. Here's an example to illustrate: Suppose there are 3 candidates, named Left, Center and Right. Suppose the voters have the following orders of preference:
35%: Left Center Right
13%: Center Left Right
12%: Center Right Left
40%: Right Center Left
Although the percentages may vary, the orders of preference are plausible: voters who favor Left also prefer Center over Right, and voters who favor Right also prefer Center over Left. If Center doesn't compete, voters who favor Center are called swing voters... some of them prefer Left over Right and the others prefer Right over Left.
Primitive voting methods count 25% for Center (13%+12%), and because 25% is smaller than Left's 35% and Right's 40%, this creates the impression that Center is less popular than Right or Left. This deters Center from competing, and the choice between Left & Right creates the appearance of polarization. The result in the example is that Right picks up about half (12%) of the voters who favor Center, and in the example Right defeats Left with a narrow 52% majority (40%+12%).
But if all of the voters' preferences are counted, Center is discovered to be the most popular candidate. A 65% landslide majority (13%+12%+40%) prefer Center over Left, and a 60% landslide majority (13%+12%+35%) prefer Center over Right. There are in fact three head-to-head majorities: 65%, 60%, and 52%. The order of finish should be constructed by processing the head-to-head majorities one at a time, from largest to smallest: First Center should be placed ahead of Left in the order of finish, because 65% rank Center over Left. Next Center should be placed ahead of Right, because 60% rank Center over Right. Next Right should be placed ahead of Left because 52% rank Right over Left. The completed order of finish is "Center Right Left" and Center is elected.
The example shows that the candidate in second place (Left, with 35%) can be a spoiler who prevents the election of the candidate in third place (Center, with 25%). By competing, Left causes the election of his/her supporters' "greater evil" Right. It's a myth that candidates of the two "largest" parties can't be spoilers.
When only one majority (or plurality) is counted, that majority (or plurality) can often be a coalition of minorities on different issues. For example, a minority who want to ban abortion, plus a minority who want to deport immigrants of color, plus a minority who oppose gun regulations, plus a minority who want to cut capital gains taxes, plus a minority who oppose environmental protection regulations, etc. This undermines majority rule and weakens politicians' incentive to support majority-preferred policies, prevents government policies from being stable, and empowers extremists because the rest of their coalition depend on their supporters' votes. But if all of the head-to-head majorities are counted, all of the coalitions are counted, and this would create a strong incentive for politicians to support majority-preferred policies. That incentive would quickly eliminate political polarization.
Whatever
This is TH-cam. Nobody is reading that. Get a job & if you have one get another 😂
>lsdiesel8025 : How arrogant you sound, to pretend you can speak on behalf of other youtube viewers. Is that because you're embarrassed about your lack of knowledge about a subject as important to the world as the very different properties of different voting methods?
It's your choice to remain uninformed. There's an old saying: You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. But if you want to learn, I suggest you begin by googling 'condorcet voting'.
>lsdiesel8025 : Whatever.
@@brendaboudinot6431 (😢 If you don't like it, you can go "Brend" aboud it.... not. .....Meh, not my best username joke, but I hope I made you smile at least 🙂)
That was a VERY well done statement by @brothermine2292! I can see a few problems with it, and I still think more common forms of Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) will ease polarization better AND reduce voting unfairness. HOWEVER, don't be disheartened that so many here are to impatient to read, unable to understand, or express their right to _not_ post even if they do patiently understand. --J
Simple one party wants Democracy the other party wants Autocracy!
3 minutes... c'mon.
imagine every conflict to be settled by farts 💨
👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑
Stick to doing Hank Pym, Mike.
Somebody profits from the divide. And, they have the money to deliver propaganda... ... through addictive technology and social media... ... using advanced marketing techniques... ... that include cult indoctrination techniques... ... to ensure that regular people can't come together... ... to do the collaboration necessary... ... to achieve the strength... ... to achieve anything... ... that is for the people. (Excessive ellipsis use intentional, with all due apologies) And, Machiavelli would be impressed. In short: somebody profits from the divide, and it's not regular people.
@TesserId (🦹Careful, Marvel villains may come after you, depending on how TesserId-acts. [Get it? The Tesseract? 😁])
What you're saying should _not_ be ignored. Neither should another possibility: that many of these competing, divided forces, too often in such a dishonest and negative fight, _honestly_ believe their side is correct/right and the other is incorrect/wrong, and are actually _not_ trying to profit in a way that they _believe_ to be immoral. That's the biggest problem; getting people to *_agree on right and wrong._* --J
@@jeyruff429 Get it? Hell, the name is meant to be the "Id" of the "Tesseract". Thanks for noticing the similarity.
@@jeyruff429 "many of these competing, divided forces, too often in such a dishonest and negative fight, honestly believe their side is correct/right and the other is incorrect/wrong, and are actually not trying to profit" Yes, this is a true statement and a worthy observation. My focus is on how marketing/propaganda is used to create that condition in which those that are in the divide have been programmed to believe they are right and that the other-side is wrong. The notion that there are those who work to divide people in this way specifically so that they can be more easily controlled. It's a historic fact that racism has been used in such a way to divide and weaken unions.
1 day later, 84,035 views, 201 comments... and the top comment is an investment bot scam. (chef's kiss)
Why ? Donald Trump
Because he's the mess under a black suit with a red pee pee tie...
Newt G. Launched a Richie Rich balloon called Donald Trump. Ruined everything. Ruined the whole damn parade.
It's actually Reagan for dismantling the Fairness Doctrine, and allowing media like Fox to spew lies unchecked....but yea, Trump too. 😂🤦🏻♂️
The polarisation is mostly a mirage, people still love their neighbours and want the same things.
I love Colbert, but have become so bored with his takes for the last few years. In fact, I used to agree with him but his obsession has turned me away. His obvious mischaracterizations have made me seek out full clips and I've seen how dishonest he is. He's exactly the same as those he criticises.
Are you comparing a comedian and satirist making fun of the nightmare world around us to the people who are supposed to be informing you of the news? Do you see how the whole premise breaks if you're stuck relying on comedians to have a more accurate picture of the world than the news?
It'd be like commenting on video of a clown performance and asking why he wasn't doing more for hard hitting journalism, while giving a pass to the news for reporting opinions of the owners of their network exclusively.
@@sebastianchambers9295 I think your comment was in reply to something else, it doesn't resemble anything like a response to what I said.
(🧐 These opinions are taken so@@saernst -iously. 🙂)
I think @sebastianchambers9295 was replying to your OP, and was as insightful and respectful as you, in my opinion. Colbert _is_ a clown in a good way, and all the big news networks have at least _some_ self-preservation bias. Perhaps some worse than others. I'm sure full clips show more context, but it's hard to blame him _as being as bad as news critics_ and giving less-than-full truth *when that's expected of a comedian,* and accurate news reporting *is not* expected.
That's why it's such a shame those rare times when comedians DO give more accurate & honest reporting!
(🧐 These opinions are taken so @@saernst -iously. 🙂)
I think @sebastianchambers9295 was replying to your OP, and was as insightful and respectful as you, in my opinion. Colbert _is_ a clown in a good way, and all the big news networks have at least _some_ self-preservation bias. Perhaps some worse than others. Furthermore, I'm sure full clips show more context, but it's hard to blame Colbert _as being as bad as news critics_ and giving less-than-full truth *when that's expected of a comedian,* and accurate news reporting *is not* expected.
That's why it's such a shame, although rare, when comedians DO give more accurate & honest reporting! --J
He has sold his soul so forget him!!!!
Our God indeed is a covenant keeping God. Has he said a thing and not perform it? I watch how things unfold in my life, from penury to $356,000 every three months and I can only praise him and trust him more. Hallelujah 🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻
Hello how do you make such monthly??
I'm a born Christian and sometimes I feel so down🤦🏼♂️ of myself because of low finance but I still believe in God🙏
But then, how do you get all that in that period of time? What is it you do please, mind sharing?
It is the digital market. That's been the secret to this wealth transfer. A lot of folks in the US and abroad are getting so much from it, God has been good to my household Thank you Jesus
Big thanks to Ms. Chisty Fiore❤️✨💯May God bless Christy Fiore services,she have changed thousands of lives globally
How can I start this digital market, any guidelines and how can I reach out to her?
I want it on the record, I should have been comment 22. It's missing. Chicken!
I totally get why my #22 comment didn't show up as number twenty two. All this just to fly to Mount Doom on a Sheryl Crowe.
@@tylercaffin3776 what is wrong with you...does it really matter? Or are you so petty you have to be starting something??
@@bonnirhr3580 All I'm trying to say is; how can we really know if Orcs go to the halls of Mandos when they die?
Thank you gay actor Michael Douglas.
Vote for decency, the rule of law and democracy VOTE BLUE! 💙💙💙
BIDEN/HARRIS 2024!!!! 👍
👍🏻🌊🌊🌊🌊
Oh I hope this gets to be the 69th comment. Ok I'm going to sleep because it's about dawn in our province's capital, but last thing just occurred to me; so one of those times I NEVER signed an NDA was when they were doing reshoots and neither Mark Sinclair or Dwayne formerly the rock johnson wouldn't come out of their trailers if the other guy was out of his. That's literally the kind of b.s. I had to turn a blind eye to because Dwayne Johnson may be a (roided up) physical presence (way more than Vin Diesel's characters wish they could be), but I could still easily kick in that door and bitch slap him around; it's his name and lawyers that made that more or less impossible... Until now.
Also, please forgive me, that was not me trying to be all Markie Mark; /oh 911 would have never.../ kind of thing here. oh man, what a dumba..s...s though; of all the things to pick, he chose /that/ to try and manifest into existence. Markie Markie buddy, even if that were true, no one ever needed to hear it.
Ant Man
I’m not competing with these people what a joke!
Not sure I understand your opinion...
Wunderbarr! Comment 22 my kid's favourite number. Ok so I'm done watching America cosplay for reals with the Handmade's Tail, and while getting my US citizenship was sooooooooo easy, you just have to be crazy Patriotic in only the way the Romans were, and technically could be a surprise candidate in November, running as an Independent, and trust me the numbers weren't difficult with who is currently running. However, what was difficult was justifying running for /"Leader of the Free World"/ (indeed) when I can just sneak win to be the next Minister of Prime of Kanada (crazy easier to rig (legally) than even the jerry rigging crap with voter lines Republicans do) and regardless of who sits behind the Revolute Desk come November, we'll either have a trade partner because a lot of our exports cum from other countries, or we'll build a wall... Also, we can actually do that, check out a map.
Ramble ramble
@@sevendegrees th-cam.com/video/Wa4DCp6cl2U/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=AllmanBrosBandVEVO
@@sevendegrees Annnnnnnd th-cam.com/video/U-cDbeI2Slg/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=MenofLettersReports
@@sevendegrees P.S. Greta Van Fleet is (and will always be) better than Led (balloon) Zeppelin.
@@sevendegrees Whoa is this one of those like internet fights I've heard sooooo much about, but thank f...u...c...k I don't use social media, I've never had the pleasure. Ok buddy, before we even begin, just know you've already cum here unarmed.
My mom told me only fisherman fart so I can never fart unless I’m fishing ps #NOCOLLUSION
He is an actor. Who lives and works in a fantasy world. His words mean nothing to hard working tax paying American citizens.
Yeah, just like Ronald Reagan, or that despicable Creep from The Apperentice.
Most people are not going to change their opinion.
Sheep dip for a Hollywood legend bring back those great talk shows...Parkinson,Carson...etc.
I actually thought Carson letterman and Jay leno weren't funny, lame comedy... now Stephen Colbert makes me laugh out loud
Yes I agree he's funny if only he'd give his guesseds more time on show.,👍🇬🇧
Am I wrong, or has his voice turned into a clone of Michael J Fox?
He had cancer.
"Why are things so polarizing".
Ill give you a hint. You've made movies for some of the people most responsible.
Huh?
That's a piss a$$ poor excuse for tRump indignant behavior.
@@sevendegreesI’m pretty sure it’s just antisemitism. Neanderthal thinking.
What are you saying? People are polarized by others opinions? Are you so shallow you can't distinguish lies from truth?
@@bonnirhr3580 You need to learn to read the full sentence. It says "people are so polarizing", that doesn't mention the source of the polarization specifically. So when you say "polarized by others opinions", you're adding context that doesn't exist to the sentence.
If you had included what I said after, yes, absolutely. Hollywood, news media, what you see around you shapes your opinion. You shouldn't let it happen, and should always question everything, but it's inevitable, and Hollywood has done this since the start, and been part of the problem and solution, depending on the situation.
And please, just stop insulting people after disagreeing with them. You can just say you don't agree, don't have to immediately take out the sledge hammer.
I don't know if I could possibly criticized a man that Married Catherine Zeta-Jones!
Re-electing Biden is like the Titanic backing up to hit the iceberg again.
Stephen Colbert is starting to be garbage in his questioning his guests. Headings are deceptively labeled.
He's still left of right.
All of Stephen's celebrities are left-wing...that's why they want to be on his show, to show their allegiance to Democrats.
@@swampy6194, that's awesome. Left is where England and France are heading. Left is correct while right is wrong 😊.
@@billyabbas I have to disagree
He has nothing to do with the headings, that's down to someone else working on the show.
Just say no to zionism
Why is everyone trying to prove their beliefs are better than someone else's when everyone knows, it's only capable of surviving when acceptance of difference is the only alternative to peace on earth...no one is GOD and no one is king..
And this is relevant here, how exactly?
I wish we could go back to the 1930s. Great memories much better than now.
Another kind of Depression.
No
Oh, yeah, grinding poverty and unemployment, the rise of fascism, impending war... so much better. 🙄
@@chezmoi42don't forget the oppression of women & minorities! The 1930s sure sounded swell.
@@overseastom Project 2025 - oops, 1935...
Who cares what he thinks. Stop listening celebrities
Slightly more than ten minutes for a legend, barely enough time to speak about his work! Colbert: hey everyone we’re going to bum rush Michael out the door. Make sure he doesn’t trip!
That's what happens when you have multiple celebrities who WANT to be on Colbert's show...
I wish we could go back to the 1930s. Great memories much better than now.